Accelerator Details: the Antiproton Source

Similar documents
Particle physics experiments

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

RUN II LUMINOSITY PROGRESS*

Run2 Problem List (Bold-faced items are those the BP Department can work on) October 4, 2002

The FAIR Accelerator Facility

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I

Advanced Design of the FAIR Storage Ring Complex

Large Hadron Collider at CERN

FY04 Luminosity Plan. SAG Meeting September 22, 2003 Dave McGinnis

Particles and Universe: Particle accelerators

Particle Accelerators. The Electrostatic Accelerators

Fermilab Collider Run II: Accelerator Status and Upgrades 1

Short Introduction to CLIC and CTF3, Technologies for Future Linear Colliders

Why do we accelerate particles?

Experimental Tests of the Standard Model. Precision Tests of the Standard Model

DESIGN OF A HIGH LUMINOSITY 100 TeV PROTON -ANTIPROTON COLLIDER

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. - Accelerator Techniques: Introduction and History -

Longitudinal Momentum Mining of Beam Particles in a Storage Ring

Beam Diagnostics Lecture 3. Measuring Complex Accelerator Parameters Uli Raich CERN AB-BI

Historical developments. of particle acceleration

Particle Acceleration

Simulations of HL-LHC Crab Cavity Noise using HEADTAIL

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

The FLUKA study of the secondary particles fluence in the AD-Antiproton Decelerator target area.

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Longitudinal stacking and electron cooling of ion beams in the ESR as a proof of principle for FAIR. C. Dimopoulou

Particle accelerators

TUNE SPREAD STUDIES AT INJECTION ENERGIES FOR THE CERN PROTON SYNCHROTRON BOOSTER

Introduction to Collider Physics

Experimental Storage Ring - ESR E max = 420 MeV/u, 10 Tm, electron-, stochastic- and laser cooling. Indian Institute of Technology Ropar

The discovery of W ± and Z 0 vector-bosons

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

Practical Lattice Design

Status of the ESR And Future Options

BEAM COOLING AT NICA COLLIDER

Physics at Accelerators

Introduction to accelerators for teachers (Korean program) Mariusz Sapiński CERN, Beams Department August 9 th, 2012

3. Particle accelerators

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Accelerators. Acceleration mechanism always electromagnetic Start with what s available: e - or p Significant differences between accelerators of

General Considerations

Theory English (Official)

LHC & ATLAS. The largest particle physics experiment in the world. Vincent Hedberg - Lund University 1

Accelerator Physics and Technologies for Linear Colliders University of Chicago, Physics 575

Engines of Discovery

Accelerators for Beginners and the CERN Complex

Transverse beam stability and Landau damping in hadron colliders

On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

The Luminosity Upgrade at RHIC. G. Robert-Demolaize, Brookhaven National Laboratory

The Relativistic Stern-Gerlach Interaction as a Tool for Attaining the Spin Separation

Lectures on accelerator physics

Beam Cooling. Beam Cooling. M. Steck, GSI, Darmstadt CERN Accelerator School Chios, Greece September 18 30, Introduction. 1.

Run II Status and Prospects

Proton. source. Antiproton CDF. source. Tevatron. Main Injector\ Recycler. CERN John Adams Lecture Shiltsev - December 13, 2010

Raising intensity of the LHC beam in the SPS - longitudinal plane

STORAGE RINGS FOR RADIO-ISOTOPE BEAMS

The CERN Accelerator School holds courses in all of the member states of CERN. 2013, Erice, Italy

EP228 Particle Physics

Discovery of the W and Z 0 Bosons

Physics at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. Darien Wood Northeastern University

ELECTRON COOLING OF PB54+ IONS IN LEIR

Introduction to Particle Accelerators & CESR-C

Accelerator Physics Weak Focusing. S. A. Bogacz, G. A. Krafft, S. DeSilva, R. Gamage Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 2

Section 4 : Accelerators

SPPC Study and R&D Planning. Jingyu Tang for the SPPC study group IAS Program for High Energy Physics January 18-21, 2016, HKUST

THE PS IN THE LHC INJECTOR CHAIN

Summary of lecture 1 and 2: Main ingredients in LHC success

PBL (Problem-Based Learning) scenario for Accelerator Physics Mats Lindroos and E. Métral (CERN, Switzerland) Lund University, Sweden, March 19-23,

Linear and circular accelerators

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Plans for ions in the injector complex D.Manglunki with the help of I-LHC and LIU-PT teams

Particle Physics Columbia Science Honors Program

Measurement and Compensation of Betatron Resonances at the CERN PS Booster Synchrotron

Unravelling the Mysteries of Matter with the CERN Large Hadron Collider An Introduction/Overview of Particle Physics

Accelerator Physics Weak Focussing. A. Bogacz, G. A. Krafft, and T. Zolkin Jefferson Lab Colorado State University Lecture 2

Electron acceleration behind self-modulating proton beam in plasma with a density gradient. Alexey Petrenko

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Synchrotron Radiation in IRAN

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

S.Y. Lee Bloomington, Indiana, U.S.A. June 10, 2011

Studies of trapped modes in the new extraction septum of the CERN Proton Synchrotron

Injection: Hadron Beams

The Big-Bang Machine. Stefan Spanier Physics and Astronomy University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 25 February 2017 Stefan Spanier, The Big Bang Machine

PARTICLE ACCELERATORS

Introduction to particle accelerators

Particle Accelerators

FAIR AT GSI. P. Spiller, GSI, Darmstadt, Germany

Introduction to Accelerators

Longitudinal dynamics Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN

There are 10 times more engineers and technicians at CERN than research physicists. Why?

The Electron-Ion Collider

Beam Cooling M. Steck, GSI Darmstadt CAS Advanced Accelerator Physics, Royal Holloway University of London, 3-15 September 2017

Lecture 1 and 2: Introduction Why do we accelerate? What are the important parameters for characterizing accelerators Lecture 3 and 4: Examples

Elementary Particle Physics Glossary. Course organiser: Dr Marcella Bona February 9, 2016

50 MeV 1.4 GeV 25GeV 450 GeV 8 TeV. Sources of emittance growth CAS 07 Liverpool. Sept D. Möhl, slide 1

BEAM TESTS OF THE LHC TRANSVERSE FEEDBACK SYSTEM

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

PY 482: Computation for particle physics. Professor Kevin Black

Transcription:

1 di 6 10/05/2006 9.23 Return to Fermilab's Chain of Accelerators (movie clip) Fermilab's Chain of Accelerators Return to Accelerator Details Main Page Why use antiprotons? A collider has an enormous advantage in energy over a fixed target machine (see relativity) To build a proton-proton collider requires two separate sets of magnets (or complicated 2 in 1 magnets) in the same tunnel. This is expensive. Since protons and antiprotons have equal and opposite electric charge, they will travel in opposite directions through the magnets. So an antiproton-proton collider can be built with one ring of magnets instead of two. At collision energies up to about 3 TeV, the production rate for some processes is higher for antiprotons colliding with protons than in head on collisions of two proton beams. At higher collision energies, such as the 14 TeV that will be available with CERN's LHC, this advantage disappears and an antiproton-proton collision is expected to exhibit the same behavior as a proton-proton collision. The disadvantage of antiproton-proton collisions is that one has to design and build an antiproton source, a difficult and expensive undertaking. The Anti-Proton Source consists of three major components:

2 di 6 10/05/2006 9.23 The Target Station The Debuncher, an 8 GeV synchrotron The Accumulator, an 8 GeV synchrotron The key to accumulating a large number of antiprotons is Stochastic Cooling The Target Station A beam of 120 GeV protons from the Main Injector is smashed on to a Nickel Target every 1.5 sec. In the collisions many particles are created. (remember E=mc 2 ). For every 1 million protons that hit the target, only about twenty 8 GeV pbars survive to make it into the Accumulator. The pbars come off the target at many different angles. They are focused into a beam line with a Lithium lens. The beam after the Lithium lens contains many different particles besides antiprotons. Many of these particles are filtered away by sending the beam through a pulsed magnet which acts as a charge-mass spectrometer.

3 di 6 10/05/2006 9.23 Debuncher Accumulator Debuncher Accumulator The beam line coming down from the top brings antiprotons from the target station to the Accumulator and sends them back from the Accumulator to the Main Injector The Debuncher The 120 GeV protons that arrive at the target station are bunched because RF is used to accelerate the beam in the Main Injector. Because the protons arriving on the target are bunched, the antiprotons [ sometimes called "pbars"] coming off the target will also be bunched. Because of the details of the collision process the antiprotons coming off the target will have a very large spread in energy. This large spread in energy of the pbars will be difficult for downstream accelerators to accept. The Debuncher accelerator is used to exchange the large energy spread and narrow time spread into a narrow energy spread and large time spread. [see relativity for the equations]

4 di 6 10/05/2006 9.23 The antiprotons have velocity very close to the velocity of light independent of their energy. The antiprotons with more energy have more mass so they travel on the outside of the Debuncher ring. The lower energy (lighter) ones will travel on the inside of the ring. Thus the lower energy antiprotonss arrive at the RF cavity before the higher energy ones because of the difference in path lengths around the accelerator. The low energy antiprotons will see a different phase of the RF than the high energy ones. This different RF phase will cause the low energy particles to be accelerated and the high energy particles to be decelerated. As this process happens over and over, eventually the energy spread will be reduced. The energy spread has been traded for a large time spread. The debunching process takes about 100 milliseconds. Antiprotons right after the target Antiprotons arriving at the RF cavity Antiprotons after many turns through the RF cavity Antiprotons at the end of debunching The Main Injector ramp rate is limited to once every 1.5 seconds. Therefore, the debunched beam can "hang around" in the Debuncher for almost 1.5 seconds before it needs to be transfered to the Accumulator and make room for a new batch of bunched antiprotons. This extra time is used to cool the pbars. The Accumulator The purpose of the Accumulator, as its name implies, is to accumulate antiprotons. This is accomplished by momentum stacking successive pulses of antiprotons from the Debuncher over several hours or days. Both RF and stochastic cooling systems are

5 di 6 10/05/2006 9.23 used in the momentum stacking process. The RF decelerates the recently injected pulses of antiprotons from the injection energy to the edge of the "stack tail." The stack tail momentum cooling system sweeps the beam deposited by the RF away from the edge of the tail and decelerates it towards the dense portion of the stack, known as the core. Additional cooling systems keep the antiprotons in the core at the desired momentum and minimize the transverse beam size. The Accumulator "ring" resembles a triangle with flattened corners. The lattice (arrangment of bending and focusing magnets) has designed to accomodate the requirements of the different stochastic cooling systems. The Accumulator must be capable of storing an antiproton beam over many hours. Stochastic Cooling The antiprotons leave the target at a wide range of energies, positions and angles. This randomness is equivalent to temperature so we say that the beam coming off the target is hot. This hot beam will have a difficult time fitting into a beam pipe of reasonable dimensions. Also, this hot beam is very diffuse and not very bright. Bright beams are needed in the collider in order to increase the probability that a rare particle might be created. Stochastic cooling is a technique that is used to remove the randomness of the hot beam on a particle by particle basis. Simone van der Meer won the Nobel prize for its invention. Stochastic Cooling systems are used in both the Debuncher and the Accumulator. Stochastic cooling uses feedback. A pickup electrode measures an error signal for a given particle. This error signal could be that particle's position or energy. The pickup signal can be extremely small, on the order of 2 trillionths of a Watt.

6 di 6 10/05/2006 9.23 Many of the pickups are cooled to liquid Nitrogen tempertures (-320 F) to reduce the effect of thermal noise. In the future, the temperature of some of the pickups will be reduced to liquid Helium temperatures (-452 F). This signal is processed and amplified. The gain of some systems is about 150 db (a factor of 10 15 ) The opposite of the error signal is applied to the antiproton at the kicker. The kicker signal can be as large as 1500 Watts. Circular machines, the Lorentz force and how synchrotrons work Link to Beams Division Antiproton Source Department Questions? Contact Ernie Malamud rev. August 16, 2000 Security, Privacy, Legal