Deuteron induced reactions, spin distributions and the surrogate method

Similar documents
Deuteron induced reactions

Inclusive deuteron induced reactions

Evaluation of inclusive breakup cross sections in reactions induced by weakly-bound nuclei within a three-body model

Two neutron transfer in Sn isotopes

Recent advances in nuclear reaction theories for weakly bound nuclei

Surrogate reactions: the Weisskopf-Ewing approximation and its limitations

SURROGATE REACTIONS. An overview of papers by Jason Burke from LLNL

Single-particle and cluster excitations

Crawling Towards a (more) complete description of deuteron-induced reactions

Status of deuteron stripping reaction theories

Dynamics of the scattering of 11 Li on 208 Pb at energies around the Coulomb barrier

Determining Compound-Nuclear Reaction Cross Sections via Surrogate Reactions: Approximation Schemes for (n,f) Reactions

Eikonal method for halo nuclei

Physic 492 Lecture 16

Problems in deuteron stripping reaction theories

Semi-Classical perturbation theory Coulomb only First-order most used

Inclusive breakup measurements of the 7 Li+ 119 Sn system.

Elastic scattering. Elastic scattering

R. P. Redwine. Bates Linear Accelerator Center Laboratory for Nuclear Science Department of Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Scattering theory I: single channel differential forms

Connecting fundamental models with nuclear reaction evaluations

(10%) (c) What other peaks can appear in the pulse-height spectrum if the detector were not small? Give a sketch and explain briefly.

NON-LOCAL OPTICAL POTENTIALS

New theoretical insights on the physics of compound nuclei from laser-nucleus reactions

Pairing Correlations in Nuclei on Neutron Drip Line

Theory and Calculation of Two-nucleon Transfer Reactions

Strengths and limitations of the surrogate reaction method to access neutron-induced cross sections of actinides

The many facets of breakup reactions with exotic beams

R-matrix Analysis (I)

Low-energy reactions involving halo nuclei: a microscopic version of CDCC

PHY982. Week Starting date Topic

Theory of Nuclear reactions. Scattering theory: multi-channel!

Investigation of the surrogate-reaction method via the simultaneous measurement of gamma-emission and fission probabilities

The surrogate-reaction method: status and perspectives. Beatriz Jurado, CENBG, France

Elastic, inelastic and inclusive alpha cross sections in 6 Li+ 112 Sn system

Exploring contributions from incomplete fusion in 6,7 Li+ 209 Bi and 6,7 Li+ 198 Pt reactions

Workshop on low-energy nuclear reaction dynamics

Cross sections for neutron capture and other compound reactions from Surrogate measurements

Asymmetry dependence of Gogny-based optical potential

FINAL-STATE INTERACTIONS IN QUASIELASTIC ELECTRON AND NEUTRINO-NUCLEUS SCATTERING: THE RELATIVISTIC GREEN S FUNCTION MODEL

Lecture 14 Krane Enge Cohen Williams Nuclear Reactions Ch 11 Ch 13 Ch /2 7.5 Reaction dynamics /4 Reaction cross sections 11.

Nuclear Direct Reactions to Continuum 4

Level density for reaction cross section calculations

Theoretical Analysis of Neutron Double-Differential Cross Section of n + 19 F at 14.2 MeV

Scattering theory II: continuation

Fusion of light halo nuclei

SOME ASPECTS OF TRANSFER REACTIONS IN LIGHT AND HEAVY ION COLLISIONS

Many-Body Theory of the Electroweak Nuclear Response

Coupled-channels Neutron Reactions on Nuclei

Calculations of Compound Nucleus Spin-Parity Distributions Populated via the (p,t) Reaction in Support of Surrogate Neutron Capture Measurements

Photonuclear Reaction Cross Sections for Gallium Isotopes. Serkan Akkoyun 1, Tuncay Bayram 2

Lecture 8 Feynman diagramms. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 24 Oct 2016

22.54 Neutron Interactions and Applications (Spring 2004) Chapter 1 (2/3/04) Overview -- Interactions, Distributions, Cross Sections, Applications

Shells Orthogonality. Wave functions

Statistical Model Calculations for Neutron Radiative Capture Process

Nucleon Transfer within Distorted Wave Born Approximation

Decays and Scattering. Decay Rates Cross Sections Calculating Decays Scattering Lifetime of Particles

The role of core excitations in break-up reactions

Resonant Reactions direct reactions:

Description of (p, pn) reactions induced by Borromean nuclei

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

CENBG, Bordeaux, France 2. CEA/DAM-DIF, Arpajon,France 3. CEA/DEN, Saint Paul Lez Durance, France 4. IPN Orsay, Orsay France 5

Allowed beta decay May 18, 2017

Universidad de Sevilla

2 Give the compound nucleus resulting from 6-MeV protons bombarding a target of. my notes in the part 3 reading room or on the WEB.

Alpha decay, ssion, and nuclear reactions

Effective Field Theory for Nuclear Physics! Akshay Vaghani! Mississippi State University!

Statistical Theory for the Beta-Delayed Neutron and Gamma-Ray Emission

arxiv:nucl-ex/ v1 21 Jun 2001

Reassessing the Vibrational Nuclear Structure of 112 Cd

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 6

Results obtained with nuclear models of Geant4 in IAEA Benchmark of Spallation

Nuclear data evaluation of 206 Pb for proton- and neutron-induced reaction in energy region from 20 to 200 MeV

STATES. D. Mark Manley. February 1, Department of Physics Kent State University Kent, OH USA KL 0 P SCATTERING TO 2-BODY FINAL

Geant4 version 10.0.p01. Hadronic Physics I. Geant4 Tutorial: version 10.0.p01. Michael Kelsey, Wed 5 Mar 2014

Lecture 4: Nuclear Energy Generation

Radiative-capture reactions

Three- and four-particle scattering

Linking nuclear reactions and nuclear structure to on the way to the drip lines

Spectroscopy of light exotic nuclei using resonance scattering in inverse kinematics.

Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015)

Open quantum systems

Parity-Violating Asymmetry for 208 Pb

Neutron detection efficiency from the 7 Li(p,n) reaction (R405n)

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Assignment 10

Systematics of the α-decay fine structure in even-even nuclei

A Monte Carlo Simulation of Prompt Gamma Emission from Fission Fragments

Direct reactions methodologies for use at fragmentation beam energies

Towards a universal nuclear structure model. Xavier Roca-Maza Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Milano, June 28 29, 2017

Alpha inelastic scattering and cluster structures in 24 Mg. Takahiro KAWABATA Department of Physics, Kyoto University

Charge exchange reactions and photo-nuclear reactions

Scattering Processes. General Consideration. Kinematics of electron scattering Fermi Golden Rule Rutherford scattering cross section

Neutrino interactions and cross sections

Quantum Mechanics II Lecture 11 ( David Ritchie

Towards Faddeev-AGS equations in a Coulomb basis in momentum space

QUANTUM CHAOS IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS

Electromagnetic reactions from few to many-body systems Giuseppina Orlandini

Today, I will present the first of two lectures on neutron interactions.

Transcription:

Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 1/25 Deuteron induced reactions, spin distributions and the surrogate method Grégory Potel Aguilar (NSCL, LLNL) Filomena Nunes (NSCL) Ian Thompson (LLNL) Varenna, June 17th 215

Introduction arenna, June 17th 215 slide 2/25 We present a formalism for inclusive deuteron induced reactions. We thus want to describe within the same framework: elastic breakup compound nucleus direct transfer Direct neutron transfer: should be compatible with existing theories. Elastic deuteron breakup: transfer to continuum states. Non elastic breakup (direct transfer, inelastic excitation and compound nucleus formation): absorption above and below neutron emission threshold. Important application in surrogate reactions: obtain spin parity distributions, get rid of Weisskopf Ewing approximation.

Historical background arenna, June 17th 215 slide 3/25 breakup-fusionqreactions BrittQandQQuinton,QPhys.QRev.Q124Q819617Q877 protonsqandqαqyields bombardingq 29 BiQwithQ 12 CQandQ 16 OQ Kerman and McVoy, Ann. Phys. 122 (1979)197 Austern and Vincent, Phys. Rev. C23 (1981) 1847 Udagawa and Tamura, Phys. Rev. C24(1981) 1348 Last paper: Mastroleo, Udagawa, Mustafa Phys. Rev. C42 (199) 683 Controversy between Udagawa and Austern formalism left somehow unresolved.

Inclusive (d, p) reaction Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 4/25 let s concentrate in the reaction A+d B(=A+n)+p χ p χ n elastic breakup ϕ A ϕ d χ d ϕ A χ p χ p ϕ 1,ϕ 2,...,ϕ n B B B ϕ n+1,ϕ n+2,... B B direct transfer neutron capture inelastic excitation coumpound nucleus non elastic breakup we are interested in the inclusive cross section, i.e., we will sum over all final states φ c B.

Neutron states in nuclei Wx9MeV8 scatteringxandxresonances broadxsingle-particle scatteringxstates E-E F x9mev8 E F weaklyxboundxstates narrowxsingle-particle deeplyxboundxstates Imaginaryxpartxofxopticalxpotential neutronxstates Mahaux,xBortignon,xBrogliaxandxDassoxPhys.xRep.x12x919858x1x Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 5/25

Derivation of the differential cross section Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 6/25 the double differential cross section with respect to the proton energy and angle for the population of a specific final φ c B d 2 σ = 2π ρ(e p ) χ p φ c B dω p de p v V Ψ(+) 2. d Sum over all channels, with the approximation Ψ (+) χ d φ d φ A d 2 σ dω p de p = 2π v d ρ(e p ) c χ d φ d φ A V χ p φ c B δ(e E p E c B ) φc B χ p V φ A χ d φ d χ d deuteron incoming wave, φ d deuteron wavefunction, χ p proton outgoing wave φ A target core ground state.

Sum over final states Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 7/25 the imaginary part of the Green s function G is an operator representation of the δ function, πδ(e E p E c B ) = lim ɛ I c φ c B φc B E E p H B + iɛ = IG d 2 σ = 2 ρ(e p )I χ d φ d φ A V χ p G χ p V φ A χ d φ d dω p de p v d We got rid of the (infinite) sum over final states, but G is an extremely complex object! We still need to deal with that.

Optical reduction of G arenna, June 17th 215 slide 8/25 If the interaction V do not act on φ A χ d φ d φ A V χ p G χ p V φ A χ d φ d where G opt is the optical reduction of G = χ d φ d V χ p φ A G φ A χ p V χ d φ d = χ d φ d V χ p G opt χ p V χ d φ d, G opt = lim ɛ 1 E E p T n U An (r An ) + iɛ, now U An (r An ) = V An (r An ) + iw An (r An ) and thus G opt are single particle, tractable operators. The effective neutron target interaction U An (r An ), a.k.a. optical potential, a.k.a. self energy can be provided by structure calculations

Capture and elastic breakup cross sections Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 9/25 the imaginary part of G opt splits in two terms elastic breakup {}}{ IG opt = π neutron capture ( ) {}}{ χ n δ E E p k2 n χ n + G opt W An G opt, 2m n k n we define the neutron wavefunction ψ n = G opt χ p V χ d φ d cross sections for neutron capture and elastic breakup d 2 σ dω p de p ] capture = 2 v d ρ(e p ) ψ n W An ψ n, d 2 σ dω p de p ] breakup = 2 v d ρ(e p )ρ(e n ) χ n χ p V χ d φ d 2,

2 step process (post representation) Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 1/25 step1 breakup d p A n A step2 propagation of n in the field of A to detector p G n non elastic breakup B* p elastic breakup A n

Austern (post) Udagawa (prior) controversy Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 11/25 The interaction V can be taken either in the prior or the post representation, Austern (post) V V post V pn (r pn ) (recently revived by Moro and Lei, University of Sevilla) Udagawa (prior) V V prior V An (r An, ξ An ) in the prior representation, V can act on φ A the optical reduction gives rise to new terms: d 2 ] post σ = 2 ρ(e p ) [ I ψn prior W An ψ prior n dω p de p v d ] + 2R ψn NON W An ψn prior + ψn NON W An ψn NON, where ψ NON n = χ p χ d φ d. The nature of the 2 step process depends on the representation

neutron wavefunctions arenna, June 17th 215 slide 12/25 the neutron wavefunctions ψ n = G opt χ p V χ d φ d can be computed for any neutron energy 2 1 bound state E n =2.5 MeV E n =-7.5 MeV -1 scattering state transfer to resonant and non-resonant continuum well described -2 5 1 15 2 25 3 r Bn these wavefunctions are not eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian H An = T n + R(U An )

Breakup above neutron emission threshold Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 13/25 1 proton angular differential cross section dσ/dω (mb/sr,,mev) 1 1.1 93 Nb,(d,p),,E d =15,MeV L=1 L=2 L= L=3 L=4 L=5 total.1 E p =9,MeV E n =3.8,MeV.1 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 θ

neutron transfer limit (isolated resonance, first order approximation) Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 14/25 Let s consider the limit W An (single particle width Γ ). For an energy E such that E E n D, (isolated resonance) G opt φ n φ n lim W An E E p E n i φ n W An φ n ; with φ n eigenstate of H An = T n + R(U An ) d 2 σ lim dω p de χ dφ d V χ p p W An φ n φ n W An φ n φ n (E E p E n ) 2 + φ n W An φ n 2 χ p V χ d φ d, we get the direct transfer cross section: d 2 σ dω p de p χ p φ n V χ d φ d 2 δ(e E p E n )

Validity of first order approximation Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 15/25 For W An small, we can apply first order perturbation theory, d 2 ] capture σ (E, Ω) 1 ] φ n W An φ n dσ transfer n dω p de p π (E n E) 2 + φ n W An φ n 2 dω (Ω) σ (mb/mev) 12 1 8 6 4 completed calculation firstd order W An =.5dMeV σ (mb/mev) 2 15 1 W An =3dMeV σ (mb/mev) 8 6 4 W An =1dMeV 5 2 2-5 -4-3 -2-1 1 2 3 4 E n -5-5 -4-3 -2-1 1 2 3 4 E n -4-3 -2-1 1 2 3 4 E n we compare the complete calculation with the isolated resonance, first order approximation for W An =.5 MeV, W An = 3 MeV and W An = 1 MeV

Application to surrogate reactions Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 16/25 Surrogate for neutron capture Desired reaction: neutron induced fission, gamma emission and neutron emission. fission n A B* gamma emission neutron emission The surrogate method consists in producing the same compound nucleus B* by bombarding a deuteron target with a radio active beam of the nuclear species A. fission A d B* gamma emission neutron emission A theoretical reaction formalism that describes the production of all open channels B* is needed.

Disentangling elastic and non elastic breakup Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 17/25 We show some results for the 93 Nb(d, p) reaction with a 15 MeV deuteron beam (Mastroleo et al., Phys. Rev. C 42 (199) 683) 7 7 dσ/de)(mb/mev) 6 5 4 3 2 non)elastic)breakup elastic)breakup total)proton)singles dσ/de)(mb/mev) ))))shift)real)part of)optical)potential 6 5 4 3 2 93 Nb(d,p) E d =15)MeV 1 1 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 E p 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 E p we have used the Koning Delaroche (Koning and Delaroche, Nucl. Phys. A 713 (23) 231) optical potential the real part of the optical potential has been shifted to reproduce the position of the L = 3 resonance contributions from elastic and non elastic breakup disentangled.

Obtaining spin distributions Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 18/25 3 25 93 Nb(d,p) E d =15 MeV L=3 dσ/de (mb/mev) 2 15 1 5 L=1 L=2 L= 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 E p spin distribution of compound nucleus dσ l = 2π ρ(e p ) ϕlmlp de p v (r Bn; k p ) 2 W (r An) dr Bn. d l p,m

Getting rid of Weisskopf Ewing approximation Weisskopf Ewing approximation: P(d, nx) = σ(e)g(e, x) inaccurate for x = γ and for x = f in the low energy regime can be replaced by P(d, nx) = J,π σ(e, J, π)g(e, J, π, x) if σ(e, J, π) can be predicted. 2 σ (mb/mev) 15 1 E p =1 MeV 5 Younes and Britt, PRC 68(23)3461 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 L n arenna, June 17th 215 slide 19/25

Summary, conclusions and some prospectives Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 2/25 We have presented a reaction formalism for inclusive deuteron induced reactions. Valid for final neutron states from Fermi energy to scattering states Disentangles elastic and non elastic breakup contributions to the proton singles. Probe of nuclear structure in the continuum. Provides spin parity distributions. Useful for surrogate reactions. Need for optical potentials. Extend for (p, d) reactions (hole states)?

The 3 body model arenna, June 17th 215 slide 21/25 p r pn d r Ap θ pd B r d r Bn ξa From H to H 3B H = T p + T n + H A (ξ A ) + V pn (r pn ) + V An (r An, ξ A ) + V Ap (r Ap, ξ A ) H 3B = T p + T n + H A (ξ A ) + V pn (r pn ) + U An (r An ) + U Ap (r Ap ) n r An A

Observables: angular differential cross sections (neutron bound states) arenna, June 17th 215 slide 22/25 1 dσ/dω (mb/sr) 1 1.1 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 L= 93 NbN(d,p)N@N15NMeV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 W An =.5NMeV L=1 transfernfresco capture.1 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 θ double proton differential cross section capture at resonant energies compared with direct transfer (fresco) calculations, capture cross sections rescaled by a factor φ n W An φ n π. d 2 σ = 2π ρ(e p ) dω p de p v d l,m,l p ϕlmlp (r Bn; k p )Y lp m (θ p) 2 W (r An ) dr Bn.

Observables: elastic breakup and capture cross sections Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 23/25 7 6 93 NbN(d,p)N@N15NMeV σn(mb/mev) 5 4 3 capture elasticnbreakup total 2 1 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 E p elastic breakup and capture cross sections as a function of the proton energy. The Koning Delaroche global optical potential has been used as the U An interaction (Koning and Delaroche, Nucl. Phys. A 713 (23) 231).

Sub threshold capture 6 L=2 5 L= 4 W An =.5 MeV 3 dσ/de (mb/mev) 2 1-7 -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 12 1 8 L=4 L=5 W An =3 MeV 6 4 2-7 -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 E n Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 24/25

Non orthogonality term dσ/dewlmb/mevy 24 21 18 15 12 9 6 93 Nbld,py E d =25.5wMeV θ p =1 o 3-4 -2 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 E n 1 lmb/mevwsry 1 E n =5 MeV d 2 σ/dedω 1 E n =-3 MeV NEB with non orthogonality NEB without nonworthogonality.1 1 2 3 4 5 θ CM 6 7 8 9 1 Varenna, June 17th 215 slide 25/25