PARAMETRIC ESTIMATION OF CONDITIONAL COPULAS

Similar documents
On the Choice of Parametric Families of Copulas

A Brief Introduction to Copulas

TUNING OF MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO ALGORITHMS USING COPULAS

Copulas. MOU Lili. December, 2014

Modelling Dropouts by Conditional Distribution, a Copula-Based Approach

Copula Regression RAHUL A. PARSA DRAKE UNIVERSITY & STUART A. KLUGMAN SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES CASUALTY ACTUARIAL SOCIETY MAY 18,2011

A New Generalized Gumbel Copula for Multivariate Distributions

Gaussian Process Vine Copulas for Multivariate Dependence

Gauge Plots. Gauge Plots JAPANESE BEETLE DATA MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FOR SPATIALLY CORRELATED DISCRETE DATA JAPANESE BEETLE DATA

Estimation Under Multivariate Inverse Weibull Distribution

Imputation Algorithm Using Copulas

Overview of Extreme Value Theory. Dr. Sawsan Hilal space

Consistent Bivariate Distribution

Convolution Based Unit Root Processes: a Simulation Approach

Copula-based Logistic Regression Models for Bivariate Binary Responses

A Goodness-of-fit Test for Copulas

FRÉCHET HOEFFDING LOWER LIMIT COPULAS IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS

Web-based Supplementary Material for. Dependence Calibration in Conditional Copulas: A Nonparametric Approach

Robustness of a semiparametric estimator of a copula

The Instability of Correlations: Measurement and the Implications for Market Risk

Financial Econometrics and Volatility Models Copulas

Lecture Quantitative Finance Spring Term 2015

GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FOR ARCHIMEDEAN COPULA MODELS

Multivariate Survival Data With Censoring.

Bayesian Inference for Conditional Copula models with Continuous and Binary Responses

Using copulas to model time dependence in stochastic frontier models

Marginal Specifications and a Gaussian Copula Estimation

EVANESCE Implementation in S-PLUS FinMetrics Module. July 2, Insightful Corp

Multivariate Statistics

Multivariate Non-Normally Distributed Random Variables

Explicit Bounds for the Distribution Function of the Sum of Dependent Normally Distributed Random Variables

Frailty Models and Copulas: Similarities and Differences

Variational Inference with Copula Augmentation

A Measure of Association for Bivariate Frailty Distributions

Chapter 1. Bayesian Inference for D-vines: Estimation and Model Selection

LOSS FUNCTIONS USED IN THE QUALITY THEORY

Chapter 3: Maximum Likelihood Theory

Fall 2017 STAT 532 Homework Peter Hoff. 1. Let P be a probability measure on a collection of sets A.

SOLUTION FOR HOMEWORK 12, STAT 4351

Calibration Estimation of Semiparametric Copula Models with Data Missing at Random

Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology SJST R1 Sukparungsee

FRÉCHET HOEFFDING LOWER LIMIT COPULAS IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS

Estimation of Copula Models with Discrete Margins (via Bayesian Data Augmentation) Michael S. Smith

Multivariate Distribution Models

Markov Switching Regular Vine Copulas

Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Friday Saturday, January 6 7, 2017

MAXIMUM ENTROPIES COPULAS

Semester I BASIC STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY STS1C01

The Delta Method and Applications

Statistical Methods for Handling Incomplete Data Chapter 2: Likelihood-based approach

Calibration Estimation for Semiparametric Copula Models under Missing Data

Correlation: Copulas and Conditioning

STA 2201/442 Assignment 2

On consistency of Kendall s tau under censoring

Chapter 1. Linear Regression with One Predictor Variable

Construction of asymmetric multivariate copulas

Maximum Likelihood Estimation. only training data is available to design a classifier

Package CopulaRegression

Simulation of Tail Dependence in Cot-copula

A simple graphical method to explore tail-dependence in stock-return pairs

Accounting for extreme-value dependence in multivariate data

VaR vs. Expected Shortfall

Direction: This test is worth 250 points and each problem worth points. DO ANY SIX

A Parametric Copula Model for Analysis of Familial Binary Data

Copulas. Mathematisches Seminar (Prof. Dr. D. Filipovic) Di Uhr in E

A measure of radial asymmetry for bivariate copulas based on Sobolev norm

U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series A, Vol. 74, Iss. 3, 2012 ISSN SCALAR OPERATORS. Mariana ZAMFIR 1, Ioan BACALU 2

Research Projects. Hanxiang Peng. March 4, Department of Mathematical Sciences Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis

Dependence. Practitioner Course: Portfolio Optimization. John Dodson. September 10, Dependence. John Dodson. Outline.

Statistics for Economists Lectures 6 & 7. Asrat Temesgen Stockholm University

Bayesian Inference for Conditional Copula models

Gaussian Copula Regression Application

Chapter 1: Linear Regression with One Predictor Variable also known as: Simple Linear Regression Bivariate Linear Regression

LECTURE 2 LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL AND OLS

Using Estimating Equations for Spatially Correlated A

Exam 2. Jeremy Morris. March 23, 2006

Probabilistic classification CE-717: Machine Learning Sharif University of Technology. M. Soleymani Fall 2016

Modelling Dependence with Copulas and Applications to Risk Management. Filip Lindskog, RiskLab, ETH Zürich

Spring 2012 Math 541A Exam 1. X i, S 2 = 1 n. n 1. X i I(X i < c), T n =

Accounting for Missing Values in Score- Driven Time-Varying Parameter Models

Semi-parametric predictive inference for bivariate data using copulas

Web-based Supplementary Material for A Two-Part Joint. Model for the Analysis of Survival and Longitudinal Binary. Data with excess Zeros

On prediction and density estimation Peter McCullagh University of Chicago December 2004

Recovering Copulae from Conditional Quantiles

f X (y, z; θ, σ 2 ) = 1 2 (2πσ2 ) 1 2 exp( (y θz) 2 /2σ 2 ) l c,n (θ, σ 2 ) = i log f(y i, Z i ; θ, σ 2 ) (Y i θz i ) 2 /2σ 2

Logistic Regression Review Fall 2012 Recitation. September 25, 2012 TA: Selen Uguroglu

Bivariate Sinh-Normal Distribution and A Related Model

2. Inference method for margins and jackknife.

Modeling Dependence of Daily Stock Prices and Making Predictions of Future Movements

Stat 5101 Lecture Notes

Probability Distribution And Density For Functional Random Variables

Chap 2. Linear Classifiers (FTH, ) Yongdai Kim Seoul National University

For iid Y i the stronger conclusion holds; for our heuristics ignore differences between these notions.

Calibration Estimation of Semiparametric Copula Models with Data Missing at Random

Bivariate Degradation Modeling Based on Gamma Process

ECON 4160, Autumn term Lecture 1

GAUSSIAN PROCESS REGRESSION

Semiparametric Gaussian Copula Models: Progress and Problems

Goodness-of-Fit Testing with Empirical Copulas

STAT331. Cox s Proportional Hazards Model

Transcription:

U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series A, Vol. 71, Iss. 3, 2009 ISSN 1223-7027 PARAMETRIC ESTIMATION OF CONDITIONAL COPULAS Mariana CRAIU 1 Modelarea dependentei într-un numar mare de modele statistice s-a dezvoltat în urma definirii de noi copule. O copula stableste modele de dependenta bidimensionale intre variabile aleatoare ale caror repartitii sunt marginalele bidimensionalei.posibilitatea introducerii de covariate conduce la variatii ale parametrului de dependenta cu valorile covariatelor.in articolul present studiem estimatii ale parametrilor acestor copule conditionate de covariate,folosind modele liniare. Copulas have evolved into a popular tool for modeling dependence in a large number of statistical models.generally, a copula establishes a flexible bridge between marginal distributions,thus allowing various dependent models to be created.recently,an extension of the classical copula construction allows us to incorporate covariates in the model and allows the copula parameter to vary with some of these covariates. In this paper I investigate inference using linear models for conditional copula parameters. Keywords: Copulas,Conditional Copulas,Clayton Copula,Frank Copula,Linear Models. Mathematics Subject Classification 2000:62H12,62E20 1. Introduction A theorem due to Sklar (1959) shows that any n-dimensional joint distribution function may be be decomposed into n marginal distributions,and a copula,which completely describes the dependence between the n variables.the copula is a more informative measure of dependence between two (or more) variables than linear correlation,as when the joint distribution of the variables of interest in nonelliptical The usual correlation coefficient is no longer sufficient to describe the dependence structure.the crux of the method is the ability to flexibly couple fixed marginal continuous distributions into multivariate distribution via a copula function. 1 Prof., Mathematics Department, University POLITEHNICA of Bucharest, Romania

4 Mariana Craiu More precisely,if X,Y are continuous random variables with distribution functions (df) F X and, respectively, F Y we specify the joint df using the copula C:[0,1] [0,1] [0,1] such that FXY ( FX ( u), FY ( ) = P( X FX ( u), Y FY ( ) = C( u,, (1) Equation (1) illustrates the way in which the copula function bridges the marginal and the joint df s.in general,the copula family depends on a parameter,say θ. As θ varies,various degrees and types of dependence are represented by the copula C θ.for instance consider the Clayton copula (Clayton 1978) / ϑ C ( u, = ( u + v ), (2) and Frank s copula (Frank 1979) θ u v ( e )( e ) 1 Cθ ( u, = ln 1 + (3) θ e Many other examples of copulas can be found in the comprehensive text of Nelsen(2006). Recently, Patton (2006) has introduced an extension of the classical copula construction in which one can incorporate the dependence between θ and a covariate Z using the concept of a conditional copula. Definition 1.1 The conditional copula of (X,Y) Z=z, where X Z=z ~F X Z (. z) and Y Z=z ~ F Y Z (. z), is the conditional joint distribution function of U = F X Z (X z) and V= F Y Z (Y z) given Z=z. The two variables U and V are known as the conditional probability integral transforms of X and Y given Z.It is simple to extend existing results to show that a conditional copula has the properties of an unconditional copula,for each Z=z as shown by Patton (2002).Patton (2006) proves the following general theorem. Theorem 1.1 Let F X Z (. z) be the conditional distribution of X Z=z, F Y Z (. z) be the conditional distribution of Y Z=z, F XY Z (. z) be the joint conditional distribution of (X,Y) Z=z. Assume that F X Z (x z) and F Y Z (y z) are continuous in x and y for all z. Then there exists a unique conditional copula C(. z) such that FXY Z ( x, y z) = C( FX Z ( x z), FY Z ( y z) z) and each z.

Parametric estimation of conditional copulas 5 In the next section we consider a possible specification of the conditional copula model. We also present parametric inference based on a linear model for the conditional copula parameter.in section 3 we study the performance of the proposed model using simulated data. 2. Specification and Parametric Inference for the Conditional Copula Model. To illustrate the concepts presented here we start with a simple example.it is known that there is a dependence between blood pressure (BP) and body mass index (BMI),as discussed in Strohl et al. (1994).However,it is possible that the dependence varies with various characteristics of the subjects under study,for instance their age.in other words one can expects that as age increases the dependence becomes stronger between the two continuous variables.suppose we would like to use a copula model to characterize this dependence between BMI and BP.Evidently,if we use a single copula parameter model then we would infer an average dependence structure.a more sensible model would allow the copula parameter itself to vary with the age of the subject.in this setting we essentially fit a separate copula for each different age group.using the concept of a conditional copula one can do this automatically using a parametric linear regression model. Define the two variables whose dependence we are interested in X,Y and the covariate Z.Suppose we decide that the copula best summarizes the dependence between X and Y is Clayton s copula (2) but in which we allow the linear dependence between Z and θ as θ = βz.besides the parameters of the marginal models for X and Y one is interested also in estimating the parameter β in order to better understand the dependence structure. For the purpose of this paper,we assume that the marginal distributions parameters are known.without loss of generality we will assume that the marginal distributions are Uniform (0,1).Therefore,the likelihood function of β can be written using the copula density corresponding to (2) which is θ 1+ 2θ ( 1+ θ ) u u ( u + u ) θ c ( u, (4) 1 2 1 2 1 If we assume that the observations are (x i,y i,z i ) 1 i n, then βz i βz 1 ( 1+ βzi ) xi yi ( xi + yi ) 1+ 2βz L( β ) = βzi (5)

6 Mariana Craiu Similarly,the density of Frank s copula is ( u+ θe ( ) ( 1 e ) cθ u, v (6) ( u+ u v e + e e e ( ) 2 Which in turn implies that the likelihood is ( xi + yi ) i βzie ( 1 e ) ( xi + yi ) β x zy ( + ) z i i β ii e e e e n L( β ) = (7) 2 1 The maximization of (5) and (7) is performed using standard optimization methods like Newton Raphson.In the next section we perform a simulation study to asses the performance of the proposed approach. 3.Simulation Experiments We performed a simulation study in which each marginal distribution is Uniform (0,1),the covariate Z~ Gamma (2,1)and the linear dependence between the copula parameter and the covariate Z is θ = β Z. Evidently, any other linear model can be used. We investigate the performance of the MLE in this case using simulations with sample sizes n =20,50,100,200 and β = 0.5; 2 for models (5) and (7)..In Table 1 we report the results obtained after 200 replications.the numbers in each cell represent the mean and, between brackets,the standard deviation of the MLE for We report the same findings for the Franf s copula model in Table 2. Table 1. Simulation results in the case of Clayton s copula.the numbers in each cell represent the mean and,between brackets the standard deviation of the MLE for β. β \ n 20 50 100 200 0,5 0,567 (0,265) 0.523(0.150) 0.503 (0.101) 0.508 (0.079) 2 2.132 (0.562) 1.995(0.328) 2.028(0.247) 2.015(0.166)

Parametric estimation of conditional copulas 7 Table 2. Simulation results in the case of Frank s copula.the numbers in each cell represent the mean and,between brackets the standard deviation of the MLE for β. β \ n 20 50 100 200 0.5 0.599(0.473) 0.526 (0.344) 0.487 (0.232) 0.501 (0.202) 2 2.068 (0.797) 2.116 (0.517) 2.041 (0.353) 2.015 (0.241) One can see that the Clayton dependence is stronger for the same value of β. The precision in estimating β depends on the copula family used. In our simulation the variance of the maximum likelihood estimator is larger under Frank s model. 4.Discussion We illustrate one possible way to incorporate covariates with copula models using the concept of a conditional copula.the model we choose to illustrate the method is a linear one but other models are evidently possible.this raises an important question for further research: how can we select the appropriate link between the copula parameter and the covariates as well as how can we select from a set of covariates the ones that indeed influence the copula parameter.these issues will be addressed in a future communication. REFERENCES [1]. D. Clayton, A model for association in bivariate life tables and its application in epidemiological studies of familiar tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrika 65,141-151, 1978 [2]. M.J. Frank, On the simultaneous assciativity of f(x,y). Aequationes Math. 19,194-226, 1979. [3]. R.B. Nelsen, An introduction to Copulas (2 nd,ed.) Springer-Verlag, 2006. [4]. A.J. Patton, Applications of copula theory in econometrics. PhDDissertation, 2002. University of California.

8 Mariana Craiu [5]. A.J. Patton, Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence.international Econom.Rev.47,527-556, 2006. [6]. K. Strohl,,R. Novak,W.Singer,C. Cahan,s.a., Insulin levels,blood pressure and sleep apnea.sleep 17(7),614-618, 1994.