Kennerly Road Irmo, South Carolina

Similar documents
±35.80 AC. E/S Old Brickyard Road Irmo, South Carolina. Site. Gerald Steele Property Features.

Wessinger Road, Hilton Area Chapin, South Carolina

±2.14 AC Broad River Road Irmo, South Carolina. Site. Property Features. Lee Bussell, Jr

±3.18 AC. 512 Rebecca Drive Leesville, South Carolina. Lakefront Lot. Property Features. For more information:

±10.89 AC. Lincreek Drive Columbia, South Carolina. Site. Property Features. For Sale. Tom Milliken

Cook Road Ridgeway, South Carolina

Cook and Peach Road. Ridgeway, South Carolina. Site. For Sale ±30.12 AC Commercial Land. Tom Milliken

Fairfield Hill Road Winnsboro, South Carolina

±0.678 AC. Site. For Sale. Tom Milliken Tombo Milliken. Chapin, South Carolina

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FORT WINGATE DEPOT ACTIVITY P.O. BOX 268 FORT WINGATE, NM January 20, 2012

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Appendix G. Stony Creek Project

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

Maggie Payne Jim Turenne

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gem County Area, Idaho

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bell County, Texas

Potential Restorable Wetlands (PRWs):

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Juan Area, Puerto Rico

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Jim Turenne. Soils on Social Media

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Blanco and Burnet Counties, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bucks County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Garfield County, Oklahoma

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Washington

2.a.. Physical Factors General Map

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Northumberland County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wasco County, Oregon, Northern Part

Soil Surveys. What are the most important properties to consider in a taxonomic system used for making a soil survey?

Introduction to Soil Science and Wetlands Kids at Wilderness Camp

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hill County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Falls County, Texas

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi

Soils of Rhode Island


Custom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Franklin County, Missouri

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hill County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi 30 27' 27'' 30 26' 57''

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bucks County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Science EOG Review: Landforms

O\.OLSSON \ ASSOC I ATES

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Wright County, MN. Overview. Legend

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbus County, North Carolina

Custom Soil Resource Report for Washoe County, Nevada, South Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hansford County, Texas

RANCHO de DOS PALMAS DAVIS, California, AC +/-

Custom Soil Resource Report for Chase County, Kansas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Producing Chandler Walnut Orchard

Introduction to the Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) Classification System

RALPH SIMMONS STATE FOREST 2016 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBITS

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hutchinson County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Santa Fe Area, New Mexico, Santa Fe County and Part of Rio Arriba County; and Santa Fe County Area, New Mexico

Custom Soil Resource Report for Okeechobee County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cuyahoga County, Ohio

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

Geology and New England Landscapes

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pinal County, Arizona, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for St. Lucie County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Valley County, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Livingston Parish, Louisiana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Union County, Pennsylvania

FOR SALE. Features Rives Road Petersburg, Virginia Chris Jenkins

Custom Soil Resource Report for Marion County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Pierce Cedar Creek Institute GIS Development Final Report. Grand Valley State University

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon, and Marion County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Custer and Pennington Counties Area, Black Hills Parts, South Dakota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cumberland County, New Jersey

A Help Guide for Using gssurgo to Find Potential Wetland Soil Landscapes

Custom Soil Resource Report for Missoula County Area, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fresno County, California, Western Part

Landscapes & Hydric Soils Bruce Vasilas University of Delaware

The following maps must be provided as a part of the ADA. The appropriate scale for each map should be determined at the pre application conference.

12- TOL MLRA Soil Survey Area Approximately 15,000,000 Acres

Alamito Creek Preserve Ranches for Sale Marfa, Presidio County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Southwest Part

Carrick Road $798,000

Transcription:

531' 420' 264' SOLD 920' 170' 254' 579' 746' Kennerly Road Irmo, South Carolina Lee Bussell, Jr. +1 803 744 9865 lbussell@naiavant.com Property Features ±12.83 AC for sale in Irmo Mostly wooded with some areas of open land Sales Price: $192,450 ($15,000 per acre) THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN HAS BEEN GIVEN TO US BY THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OR OTHER SOURCES WE DEEM RELIABLE. WE HAVE NO REASON TO DOUBT ITS ACCURACY, BUT WE DO NOT GUARANTEE IT. ALL INFORMATION SHOULD BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO PURCHASE OR LEASE. 807 Gervais Street, Suite 301 Columbia, South Carolina 29201 +1 803.254.0100 www.naiavant.com

Location UV 215 UV 269 Monticello Rd Eleazer Rd Broad River 176 Site Old Tamah Rd Ballentine Park Lake Murray of Richland Lake Murray Dutch Fork Rd UV 6 Irmo Broad 26 River Rd Annie Adkins Rd Hollingshed Rd Columbia Harbison State Forest 2721 & 2725., Irmo, SC 29063

Aerial With Calculated Acreage 531' 420' 264' SOLD 920' 170' 254' 579' 746' 2721 & 2725., Irmo, SC 29063

Topographical Map: 2' Contours Sold 2721 & 2725., Irmo, SC 29063

Topographical Map: 10' Contours Sold 2721 & 2725., Irmo, SC 29063

FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer & National Wetlands Inventory Sold 2721 & 2725., Irmo, SC 29063

Soil Survey NaB GeB Sold NaC 2721 & 2725., Irmo, SC 29063

Map Unit Description (Brief, Generated) Richland County, South Carolina [Minor map unit components are excluded from this report] Map unit: GeB - Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Component: Georgeville (85%) The Georgeville component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 6 percent. This component is on interfluves, piedmonts. The parent material consists of residuum weathered from metavolcanics and/or residuum weathered from metasedimentary rock and/or residuum weathered from slate. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is high. Shrink-swell potential is low. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 1 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: NaB - Nason silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Component: Nason (100%) The Nason component makes up 100 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 6 percent. This component is on hillslopes on uplands. The parent material consists of clayey residuum weathered from slate. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 2e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Map unit: NaC - Nason silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes Component: Nason (100%) The Nason component makes up 100 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 6 to 10 percent. This component is on hillslopes on uplands. The parent material consists of clayey residuum weathered from slate. Depth to a root restrictive layer, bedrock, paralithic, is 40 to 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high. Available water to a depth of 60 inches is moderate. Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded. There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 2 percent. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. Survey Area Version: 15 Survey Area Version Date: 12/23/2013 Page 1