Salinity effects on the stomatal behaviour of grapevine

Similar documents
Irrigation water salinity limits faba bean (Vicia faba L.) photosynthesis

Basic stoichiometric equation on photosynthesis and the production of sugar and oxygen via the consumption of CO2, water, and light

Understanding how vines deal with heat and water deficit

Water Relations in Viticulture BRIANNA HOGE AND JIM KAMAS

POTASSIUM IN PLANT GROWTH AND YIELD. by Ismail Cakmak Sabanci University Istanbul, Turkey

BY ROBERT T. FURBANK AND DAVID A. WALKER Research Institute for Photosynthesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield SIO 2TN, UK

Factors which influence plant growth

Water use efficiency in agriculture

Photosynthetic Characteristics of Spinach Leaves Grown with Different Nitrogen Treatments

Relationship between Leaf Water Potential and Photosynthesis in Rice Plants


Carbon Input to Ecosystems

DIURNAL CHANGES IN LEAF PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND RELATIVE WATER CONTENT OF GRAPEVINE

1/23/2011. Grapevine Anatomy & Physiology. What is Light? WSU Viticulture Certificate Program. Photosynthesis & Respiration.

MODELLING NET PHOTOSYNTHETIC RATE OF TEMPERATE DRY GRASSLAND SPECIES AND WINTER WHEAT AT ELEVATED AIR CO 2 CONCENTRATION

Hort Chapter 10 MENGEL et al, 5th Ed

Plant form and function. Photosynthesis Phloem Plant Nutrition

Other Metabolic Functions of Water in Grapevines

Terrestrial land surfacesa pot pourri

The relationship between photosystem II efficiency and quantum yield for CO 2 assimilation is not affected by nitrogen content in apple leaves

C MPETENC EN I C ES LECT EC UR U E R

VOCABULARY COMPTETENCIES. Students, after mastering the materials of Plant Physiology course, should be able to:

The effect of smoke on the photosynthetic gas exchange of Chrysanthemoides monilifera

Interactions between ozone and drought stress in plants: mechanisms and implications. Sally Wilkinson and William J. Davies, Lancaster University

Topic Covered. Name of the College/Institute: S K N College of Agriculture (SKNAU) Jobner

WATER RELATIONS OF WHEAT ALTERNATED BETWEEN TWO ROOT TEMPERATURES

Common Effects of Abiotic Stress Factors on Plants

M. Kafi 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Changes in Plant Metabolism Induced by Climate Change

Chapter 5: Photosynthesis: The Energy of Life pg : Alternative Mechanisms of Carbon Fixation pg

Effects of flooding and salinity on photosynthesis of Sagittaria lan cif olia

NOTES: CH 10, part 3 Calvin Cycle (10.3) & Alternative Mechanisms of C-Fixation (10.4)

472 J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115(3): be as important to survival as stomatal or cuticular regulation of water loss.

Photosynthetic gas exchange and water use in tropical and subtropical populations of the mangrove Aegiceras corniculatum

WJEC. BY4 Photosynthesis Questions

Chapter 10: PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Figure 1. Identification of UGT74E2 as an IBA glycosyltransferase. (A) Relative conversion rates of different plant hormones to their glucosylated

Isotopes as tracers of biogeochemical processes Scott Saleska, 2/11/11

Grapevine Water Relations

Trees are: woody complex, large, long-lived self-feeding shedding generating systems compartmented, self optimizing

Mlchio KANECHI, Naotsugu UCHIDA, Takeshl YASUDA and Tadashi YAMAGUCHI Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University, Rokko, Kobe 657

BIOL 221 Concepts of Botany Water Relations, Osmosis and Transpiration:

Chapter 4-2. Transpiration diffusion of water vapor

Energy Conversions. Photosynthesis. Plants. Chloroplasts. Plant Pigments 10/13/2014. Chapter 10 Pg

Demonstration of ammonia accumulation and toxicity in avocado leaves during water-deficit stress

CO 2 PGA ATP. RuBP G3P. 6-carbon sugars CONTROLS ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND SUGAR PRODUCTION IN C3 AND C4 PLANTS: A MODELING APPROACH

Breeding for Drought Resistance in Cacao Paul Hadley

5/08/ :49 PM 28/02/13. Lecture 2: Photosynthesis:

Hormonal and other chemical effects on plant growth and functioning. Bill Davies Lancaster Environment Centre, UK

A. Structures of PS. Site of PS in plants: mostly in leaves in chloroplasts. Leaf cross section. Vein. Mesophyll CO 2 O 2. Stomata

RuBP has 5 carbons and is regenerated in the Calvin cycle. In the Calvin cycle, carbon is conserved, ATP is used and NADPH is used.

Chapter 35 Regulation and Transport in Plants

cytosol stroma Photorespiration: Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco)

6.6 Light Independent Reactions: The Sugar Factory

Effect of Girdling on Leaf Gas Exchange, Water Status, and Non-structural Carbohydrates of Field-grown Vitis vinifera L. (cv.

Biochemical, Physiological and Morphological Responses of Sugar Beet to. Salinization

Importance. The Reaction of Life : The conversion of the sun s energy into a form man and other living creatures can use.

Published Research in Journal: Plant and Soil - PLANT SOIL, vol. 332, no. 1, pp , 2010

Root Signals Control Leaf Expansion in Wheat Seedlings Growing in Drying Soil

1. What is the source of the oxygen released into the air as a product of photosynthesis? D. Both water and carbon dioxide (Total 1 mark)

" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " The Effect of Sunlight on the Rate of Photosynthesis in Trachelospermum Jasmenoides" Nika Vafadari "

HORMONAL MODIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE TO WATER STRESS By Y. MIZRAHI* and A. E. RWHMOND* [Manuscript received 8 November 1971] Abstract

Chapter 8 PHOTOSYNTHESIS Chapter # Chapter Title PowerPoint Image Slideshow

Chapter 10. Photosynthesis

Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants

STOMATAL RESPONSES TO LIGHT AND CARBON DIOXIDE IN THE HART'S-TONGUE FERN, PHYLLITIS SCOLOPENDRIUM NEWM.

Lecture notes on stomatal conductance. Agron 516: Crop physiology. Dr. Mark Westgate.

GENETIC ANALYSES OF ROOT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN THE TOMATO CROP MODEL

CHAPTER TRANSPORT

SALT TOLERANCE IN THE HALOPHYTE SUAEDA MARITIMA (L.) DUM. THE EFFECT OF SALINITY ON THE CONCENTRATION OF SODIUM IN THE XYLEM

I. ESSAY QUESTIONS (5 Points Each)

Chapter 7 Capturing Solar Energy: Photosynthesis. Chapter 7: Photosynthesis. What is Photosynthesis?

Photosynthesis: Carbon Reactions. Dr. Obaidur Rahman

Overview - the process that feeds the biosphere. Photosynthesis: transformation of solar energy into chemical energy.

Environmental Plant Physiology Photosynthesis - Aging. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

The table lists some functions of parts of a plant. Match the part of the plant (A, B, C or D) to its function by writing the letters in the table.

Photosynthesis - Aging Leaf Level. Environmental Plant Physiology Photosynthesis - Aging. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

Effect of Salinity on Growth and Leaf Photosynthesis of Two Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Cultivars

Drought Tolerant Criterion of Wheat Genotypes Using Carbon Isotopes Discrimination Technique

Photosynthesis Thursday, July 7, 2011

Biology Article Assignment #2 Rising Carbon Dioxide Levels and Plants

1. Bud or node: Out of this either a leaf or a fruit-bearing shoot will develop.

CHAPTER XI PHOTOSYNTHESIS. DMA: Chapter 11 Hartmann's 1

Carbon-water balance and patchy stomatal conductance

9- #60 5. Photosynthesis. Sixth edition. D. O. Hall. and. K. K. Rao. Published in association with the Institute of Biology CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS

Chapter 10 Photosynthesis

Mesophyll conductance: a third player in the photosynthesis game

Ecological Modelling 106 (1998)

Nonsteady-State Photosynthesis following an Increase in Photon Flux Density (PFD)1

Chapter 12 & 13 Transport, Soil and Mineral Nutrition

THE RESPONSE TO NaCl AND IONIC CONTENT OF SELECTED SALT-TOLERANT AND NORMAL LINES OF THREE LEGUME FORAGE SPECIES IN SAND CULTURE

Stomatal conductance has a strong dependence upon humidity deficits

Where It Starts: Photosynthesis. Chapter 5

Some Environmental Effects on Photosynthesis and Water Relations of Avocado Leaves

Plant Growth and Development Part I I

Lecture 9: Photosynthesis

Chapter 36~ Transport in Plants

GFP GAL bp 3964 bp

Plant Gene and Trait, 2013, Vol.4, No.8,

Impact of Environmental and Stress Factors on the Photosynthetic Capabilities of Plants

Transcription:

New Phytol. (1990), 116, 499-503 Salinity effects on the stomatal behaviour of grapevine BY W. J. S. DOWNTON, B. R. LOVEYS AND W. J. R. GRANT CSIRO Division of Horticulture, GPO Box 350, Adelaide, 5001, Australia {Received 25 April 1990 ; accepted 26 July 1990) SUMMARY An investigation of the time-course of inhibition of photosynthesis in salt-stressed grapevine {Vitis vinifera L.) leaves revealed two types of stomatal behaviour. Up to tissue concentrations of 165 mm chloride the inhibition was due to a uniform decrease in stomatal conductance, as indicated from autoradiograms of "CO^ fixation and no change in the relationship of assimilation to calculated intercellular partial pressure of COg {A-C,) compared with control plants. The occurrence of non-stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis at higher levels of leaf chloride, suggested by a decline in the slope of the calculated A-C. relationship, was associated with non-uniform "CO^ uptake over the leaf surface similar to that previously observed for ABA-treated and water-stressed grapevine leaves where non-stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis was shown to be an artifact arising from non-uniform stomatal behaviour. These observations also provide an explanation for the stimulation of photorespiration during salt stress. Key words: Chloride, photosynthesis, salt stress, stomata, Vitis vinifera. INTRODUCTION Previous time-course studies on salt-stressed grapevines have documented an initial stomatal inhibition of photosynthetic gas exchange followed by the onset of non-stomatal inhibition at higher levels of leaf chloride (Walker et a/., 1981; Walker & Downton, 1982). These effects have been associated with increased photorespiration as evidenced by greatly enhanced photosynthesis when oxygen is lowered from 21 to 2% O^ (Walker et al., 1981; Walker & Downton, 1982) and stimulated labelling of photorespiratory pathway intermediates in leaves exposed to ^^COg (Downton, 1977). Recently it has become evident that conclusions drawn from gas exchange data can be considerably in error, particularly during stress where stomata may not behave uniformly (Downton, Loveys & Grant, 19886; Sharkey & Seemann, 1989), thereby generating false evidence for direct (non-stomatal) effects of stress on photosynthesis. In view of the possibility that this may also occur during salt stress we have re-examined the time-course of salt-induced inhibition of photosynthesis in grapevine and document two types of stomatal behaviour depending on the extent to which chloride has accumulated within the leaf. MATERIALS AND METHODS Grapevines {Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultana syn. Thompson Seedless) were grown as rooted cuttings (Downton & Loveys, 1978) in a soil mix consisting of 10% peatmoss:90% coarse sand during the period October-January (Southern Hemisphere). Plants were grown in a temperature-controlled glasshouse (mean maximum 28±2 C, mean minimum 17 ± 2 C) covered with 50 % shadecloth which reduced maximum photon flux density at mid-day to about 900 jimol photons m~^ s~^ (PAR). Following budburst, plants were trimmed to one shoot and regularly watered with a commercial water soluble fertilizer (Aquasol, Hortico Australia Pty Ltd; 0-12 gt^) which was supplemented with 50 mg 1"^ Ca(NO3)2.4H2O and 6 mg T^ FeEDTA. The Aquasol solution contained approx. 0-5 mm chloride. Salt treatment was applied to half of the vines following an establishment period of 7 wk by which time shoots were approx. 06 m long with about 10 leaves. Salt treatment consisted of the addition of 75 mm NaCl to the basic nutrient solution. Midshoot leaves which had just attained maximal photosynthetic rates (30-40 d old) were studied over the next 6-5 wk period. Photosynthetic rates were measured at intervals

500 W. J. S. Dotmton, B. R. Loveys and W. J. R. Grant during the course of the experiment. The relationship of assimilation {A) to intercellular partial pressure of COg (Q) was determined at decreasing partial pressure of COg external to the leaf (C^) from 340 to 80ytfbar COg using an open gas-exchange system (Downton, Grant & Robinson, 1985) and results calculated according to von Caemmerer & Farquhar (1981). Cuvette conditions were maintained at 26 + 2 C, with a leaf-to-air water vapour difference of 1-4 to 1-8 kpa. The photon irradiance incident on the leaves was 800 /*mol photons m"^ s~^ (PAR). The uniformity of assimilation was assessed by exposing leaves to ^^COg for 20 s in the gas exchange cuvette under the conditions described above (0-18 MBq ^^COg; Ca - 300/tbar). The leaf was rapidly frozen between two sheets of aluminium cooled to 60 C and the adaxial surface placed directly against film (Beta-max, Amersham) to produce autoradiograms. Leaf tissue was oven-dried at 70 C and powdered in a mortar. Chloride was measured by silver ion titration with a Buchler-Cotlove chloridometer (Nuclear Chicago, NJ, USA) and results expressed on a tissue water basis. 50 150 250 Intercellular CO2 (/ibar) Figure 1. Response of photosynthesis to the partial pressure of intercellular COg in salt-stressed grapevine leaves. Control leaf: curve A (48 mm Cl~). Salt-treated leaves: point B (162 mm Cr), curve C (217 mm Cl"), curve D (293 mm C1-), curve E (300 mm Cl"), curve F (317 mm cn. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Plants receiving salt treatment continued to accumulate chloride into leaves over the course of the experiment (Table 1) and necrosis was evident on the margins of some of the leaves by day 46. These salt 'burn' symptoms occurred at tissue levels of chloride of about 350 mm as observed previously (Downton & Millhouse, 1983). Basal levels of chloride in leaves of untreated plants, which ranged between 35 and 50 mm and originated from the cutting itself and from the low level of chloride in the nutrient solution, did not change with time. These control plants maintained photosynthetic rates of 14-5 ±0-7/^mol COg m~^ s"^, stomatal conductances of 0*35 ±0-03 mol m~^ s~^ and an intercellular COg partial pressure of 262 ±5 /ihar (n = 9), whereas the salt-treated plants showed a steady decline in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance with time (Table 1). Intercellular partial pressure of COg fell from 260 to 200 /*bar following salt treatment and remained at that level for most of the experiment. The relationship of A vs. Q was also calculated to determine the extent of stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. Q is routinely calculated from gas exchange data to determine the photosynthetic behaviour of leaves in the absence of stomatal limitations (von Caemmerer & Farquhar, 1981) and a decrease in slope of the A-C^ relationship with treatment is taken as evidence for direct (nonstomatal) inhibition of photosynthesis. Line A in Figure 1 shows a typical A-C^^ curve for the untreated leaves. Plants receiving salt-treatment for 14 d also followed this same A-C^ relationship, except that Q was much reduced (point B on line A; Table 1). Beyond 14 d, there was a progressive decline in the slope of the A C^ relationship as tissue levels of chloride increased beyond 165 mm, indicative of increasing non-stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis. Table 1. Photosynthesis (A), stomatal conductance (g), intercellular partial pressure of CO^ (Q) and chloride concentration in leaves of salt-treated grapevines. Mean + SE for 3 replicate plants Days of treatment A (jimol COg m"^! 3-^) g (mol m~^ s-^) c. (/ibar COg) ci- (mm) 0 14 21 39 46 12-7 + 0-2 10-1+0-7 8-5 + 1-0 3-9 + 0-5 l-3±0-l 0-29 + 0-014 0-13 + 0-013 0-09 + 0-011 0-03+0-003 0-01 ±0-001 256 + 3 199 + 8 189+15 143 + 12 196±8 41+2 165 + 5 212 + 8 277 + 11 305 ±10

Effects of salinity on stomata of grapevine 501 Figure 2. Autoradiograms of salt-stressed grapevine leaves exposed to the same leaves whose A-C^ curves are presented in Figure 1. Bar, 5 mm These results accord well with those of Walker et al (1981) who observed stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis in salt-treated Sultana vines up to tissue levels of chloride of about 150 mm, followed by 35 for 20 s. Autoradiograms are for increased mesophyll resistances at higher chloride levels. However, it is also now well documented that evidence for non-stomatal inhibition of photosynanp 116

502 W. y. S. Downton, B. R. Loveys and W. J. R. Grant thesis derived from A-Ci curves can be artifactual if stomata do not behave uniformly (Laisk, 1983; Farquhar et al., 1987; Downton, Loveys & Grant, 19SSa,b: Terashima et al, 1988; Sharkey & Seemann, 1989). To test this possibility, leaves were exposed to ^^COg for a short period of time and autoradiograms prepared in order to visualize spatial variation in stomatal conductance to COg as previously described (Downton et al, 1988a, fe). Figure 2 shows autoradiograms of the same leaves whose A-Ci curves are presented in Figure 1. Figure 2 fl is an example of a control leaf which shows uniform uptake of COg over the leaf surface. This uniformity was evident prior to commencement of salt-treatment and for control leaves during the experiment. Figure 2 b shows a leaf which had received 14 d of salt treatment. As expected from its position on the A-C^^ curve (Fig. 1), ^^COg uptake by leaf B was uniform, but the intensity of labelling was less due to reduced stomatal conductance. Figure 2{c-f) depicts autoradiograms of leaves containing progressively higher concentrations of chloride and showing decreasing slopes of A-C^. It is evident that these changes are associated with increasingly patchy CO2 fixation. Using a combination of chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange techniques we earlier demonstrated that non-uniform stomatal closure could completely account for the inhibition of photosynthesis in grapevine leaves treated with ABA or experiencing water stress (Downton et al, 1988 a, b). Although we did not utilize chlorophyll fluorescence quenching methodology in this study, it seems likely that at least part of the apparent non-stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis evident at the higher levels of tissue chloride arises from the non-uniform stomatal conductance to CO2 evident in the autoradiograms. This is supported by observations that cessation of salt treatment to Sultana vines results in a complete recovery of photosynthesis in leaves with high mesophyll resistances and containing about 200 mm chloride (Walker et al, 1981). Furthermore, although high salt treatment of Plantago maritima leads to a reduced A-C^ relationship at atmospheric levels of CO2, there is no difference from low-salt plants in oxygen evolution when measured at high partial pressures of CO2 in a leaf disc electrode (Flanagan & Jefferies, 1989). This is a similar response to that observed by Robinson, Grant & Loveys (1988) where high partial pressures of CO2 were found to largely overcome low stomatal conductances induced by ABA-treatment. We have previously observed increases in leaf ABA levels in salt-treated sultana vines, which remained elevated for some weeks (Downton & Loveys, 1981) and this may be associated with the non-uniform COg uptake evident in the autoradiograms. The present study also clarifles earlier observations on changes in photosynthetic carbon metabolism in salt-stressed grapevines. Increased salt concentrations in leaves were found to be associated with decreased **C-labelIing of sugar monophosphates, 3- phosphoglyceric acid and sucrose and increased labelling of ribulose,l-5-bisphosphate, glycolic acid, glycine and serine (Downton, 1977). This increased labelling of the photorespiratory pathway with salt stress, which resembles the effect of decreased partial pressure of CO2 on photosynthesis originally described by Wilson & Calvin (1955), can now be interpreted simply in terms of stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis and CO2 depletion in regions of low stomatal conductance, rather than to unknown direct effects on salinity or carbon metabolism itself. These changes in stomatal behaviour accompanying salt stress also account for the larger than expected low oxygen enhancement of photosynthesis in leaves with seemingly high mesophyll resistances (Walker et al, 1981). It can be concluded that for woody perennial crop plants such as grapevine with highly compartmentalized leaves, salt and water stress, which seemingly cause direct inhibition of photosynthesis, do so mainly by altering stomatal behaviour which restricts access of CO2 into the leaf. This implies that these environmental stress factors have no immediate effects on the photosynthetic process itself a viewpoint that is gaining increased support (Flanagan & Jefferies, 1989; Robinson, Downton & Loveys, 1989; Sharkey & Seemann, 1989). The important implication of this flnding for vineyard and orchard management in the irrigation areas is that management decisions can be taken to reverse stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis, readily detectable by porometry as a decrease in leaf conductance, before the duration and extent of the stress secondarily results in longer term damage to the photosynthetic apparatus which may not be readily reversible. REFERENCES DOWNTON, W. J. S. (1977). Photosynthesis in salt-stressed grapevines. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 4, 183-192. DOWNTON, W. J. S., GRANT, W. J. R. & ROBINSON, S. P. (1985). Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of spinach leaves to salt stress. Plant Physiology, 78, 85-88. DOWNTON, W. J. S. & LOVEYS, B. R. (1978). Compositional changes during grape berry development in relationship to abscisic acid and salinity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5,415-423. DOWNTON, W. J. S. & LOVEYS, B. R. (1981). Abscisic acid content and osmotic relations of salt-stressed grapevine leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 8, 443-452. DOWNTON, W. J. S., LOVEYS, B. R. & GRANT, W. J. R. (1988o). Stomatal closure fully accounts for the inhibition of photosynthesis by abscisic acid. New Phytologist 108, 263-266. DOWNTON, W. J. S., LOVEYS, B. R. & GRANT, W. J. R. (19886). Non-uniform stomatal closure induced by water stress causes putative non-stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis. New Phytologist 110, 503-509. DOWNTON, W. J. S. & MILLHOUSE, J. (1983). Turgor maintenance during salt stress prevents loss of variable fluorescence in grapevine leaves. Plant Science Letters 31, 1-7.

Effects of salinity on stomata of grapevine FARQUHAR, G. D., HUBICK, K. T., TERASHIMA, I., CONDON, A. G. & RICHARDS, R. A. (1987). Genetic variation in the relationship between photosynthetic CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductance to water loss. In: Progress in Photosynthesis Research, vol. 4 (Ed. by J. Biggins), pp. 209-212. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht. FLANAGAN, L. B. & JEFFERIES, R. L. (1989). Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of the halophyte Piantago maritima L. to fluctuations in salinity. Plant, Cell and Environment 12 559-568. LAISK, A. (1983). Calculation of leaf photosynthetic parameters considering the statistical distribution of stomatal apertures. Journal of Experimental Botany 34, 1627-1635. ROBINSON, S. P., DOWNTON, W. J. S. & LOVEYS, B. R. (1989). Stress effects on photosynthesis. In: Plant Water Relations and Growth Under Stress, Proceedings of the Yamada Conference XXII, pp. 109-116. Yamada Science Foundation and Myu K.K., Tokyo. ROBINSON, S. P., GRANT, W. J. R. & LOVEYS, B. R. (1988). Stomatal limitation of photosynthesis in abscisic acid-treated and in water-stressed leaves measured at elevated Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15, 495-503. 503 SHARKEY, T. D. & SEEMANN, J. R. (1989). Mild water stress effects on carbon-reduction-cycle intermediates, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity, and spatial homogeneity of photosynthesis in intact leaves. Plant PhysiologyOT, 1060-1065. TERASHIMA, I., WONG, S. C, OSMOND, C. B. & FARQUHAR, G. D. (1988). Characterisation of non-uniform photosjmthesis induced by abscisic acid in leaves having different mesophyll anatomies. Plant and CeU Physiology 29, 385-394. VON CAEMMERER, S. & FARQUHAR, G. D. (1981). Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153, 376-387. WALKER, R. R. & DOWNTON, W. J. S. (1982). Photosynthesis in salt stressed woody perennials. In: Biosaline Research : A Look To The Future (Ed. by A. San Pietro), pp. 549-554. Plenum Publishing Corp., New York. Walker, R. R., Torokfalvy, E., Scott, N. S. & Kriedemann, P. E. (1981). An analysis of photosynthetic response to salt treatment in Vitis vinifera. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 8, 359-374. WILSON, A. J. & CALVIN, M. (1955). The photosynthetic cycle. CO2 dependent transients. Journal of American Chemical Society 77, 5948-5957. 35-2