HOPF ALGEBRAS WITH TRACE AND CLEBSCH-GORDAN COEFFICIENTS. 1. Recollections and the problem

Similar documents
where a is any ideal of R. Lemma 5.4. Let R be a ring. Then X = Spec R is a topological space Moreover the open sets

where a is any ideal of R. Lemma Let R be a ring. Then X = Spec R is a topological space. Moreover the open sets

Lecture 14 - Isomorphism Theorem of Harish-Chandra

An Introduction to Morita Theory

MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES EXAMPLES OF C ALGEBRAS

NOTES FOR QUANTUM GROUPS, CRYSTAL BASES AND REALIZATION OF ŝl(n)-modules

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

FACTORIZATION IN KRULL MONOIDS WITH INFINITE CLASS GROUP

FINITELY-GENERATED MODULES OVER A PRINCIPAL IDEAL DOMAIN

12 MATH 101A: ALGEBRA I, PART C: MULTILINEAR ALGEBRA. 4. Tensor product

Lecture 7: Gluing prevarieties; products

SL n (F ) Equals its Own Derived Group

LECTURE V. 1. More on the Chinese Remainder Theorem We begin by recalling this theorem, proven in the preceeding lecture.

DIFFERENTIAL FORMS BRIAN OSSERMAN

Journal of Algebra 368 (2012) Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect. Journal of Algebra.

Degree of Parabolic Quantum Groups

GELFAND-TSETLIN BASIS FOR THE REPRESENTATIONS OF gl n

2.3 Nilpotent endomorphisms

DISCRIMINANTS AND RAMIFIED PRIMES. 1. Introduction A prime number p is said to be ramified in a number field K if the prime ideal factorization

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

REDUCTION MODULO p. We will prove the reduction modulo p theorem in the general form as given by exercise 4.12, p. 143, of [1].

INVARIANT STABLY COMPLEX STRUCTURES ON TOPOLOGICAL TORIC MANIFOLDS

The Pseudoblocks of Endomorphism Algebras

ALGEBRA SCHEMES AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Representation theory and quantum conservation laws

8.4 COMPLEX VECTOR SPACES AND INNER PRODUCTS

SUPER PRINCIPAL FIBER BUNDLE WITH SUPER ACTION

Errata to Invariant Theory with Applications January 28, 2017

ALGEBRA SCHEMES AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 13

Linear, affine, and convex sets and hulls In the sequel, unless otherwise specified, X will denote a real vector space.

Math 101 Fall 2013 Homework #7 Due Friday, November 15, 2013

Categorification of quantum groups

Descent is a technique which allows construction of a global object from local data.

ALGEBRA MID-TERM. 1 Suppose I is a principal ideal of the integral domain R. Prove that the R-module I R I has no non-zero torsion elements.

Polynomials. 1 More properties of polynomials

First day August 1, Problems and Solutions

Quantum groups and quantized q-difference birational Weyl group actions

Fixed points of IA-endomorphisms of a free metabelian Lie algebra

Restricted Lie Algebras. Jared Warner

POL VAN HOFTEN (NOTES BY JAMES NEWTON)

MTH 819 Algebra I S13. Homework 1/ Solutions. 1 if p n b and p n+1 b 0 otherwise ) = 0 if p q or n m. W i = rw i

9 Characteristic classes

42. Mon, Dec. 8 Last time, we were discussing CW complexes, and we considered two di erent CW structures on S n. We continue with more examples.

Canonical transformations

= s j Ui U j. i, j, then s F(U) with s Ui F(U) G(U) F(V ) G(V )

n α j x j = 0 j=1 has a nontrivial solution. Here A is the n k matrix whose jth column is the vector for all t j=0

Lecture 5 Decoding Binary BCH Codes

a b a In case b 0, a being divisible by b is the same as to say that

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Bezier curves. Michael S. Floater. August 25, These notes provide an introduction to Bezier curves. i=0

Bézier curves. Michael S. Floater. September 10, These notes provide an introduction to Bézier curves. i=0

Distribution det x s on p-adic matrices

Smarandache-Zero Divisors in Group Rings

ALGEBRA HW 7 CLAY SHONKWILER

28 Finitely Generated Abelian Groups

Lie Algebra Cohomology and the Borel-Weil-Bott Theorem. 1 Lie algebra cohomology and cohomology of G/T with coefficients in a line bundle

2 More examples with details

Lecture 12: Discrete Laplacian

5 The Rational Canonical Form

BOUNDEDNESS OF THE RIESZ TRANSFORM WITH MATRIX A 2 WEIGHTS

DIFFERENTIAL SCHEMES

3.1 Expectation of Functions of Several Random Variables. )' be a k-dimensional discrete or continuous random vector, with joint PMF p (, E X E X1 E X

COMPLEX NUMBERS AND QUADRATIC EQUATIONS

Eigenvalues of Random Graphs

On a Certain Subalgebra of U q (ŝl 2) Related to the Degenerate q-onsager Algebra

A proof of the dimension conjecture and of Jacobi's bound. François Ollivier (CNRS) LIX UMR CNRS École polytechnique

Problem Do any of the following determine homomorphisms from GL n (C) to GL n (C)?

Character Degrees of Extensions of PSL 2 (q) and SL 2 (q)

Random Walks on Digraphs

1 Matrix representations of canonical matrices

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

7. Products and matrix elements

Section 3.6 Complex Zeros

More metrics on cartesian products

THE CHINESE REMAINDER THEOREM. We should thank the Chinese for their wonderful remainder theorem. Glenn Stevens

arxiv:alg-geom/ v3 6 Mar 2014

Quantizations of Kac-Moody algebras

Algebraic properties of polynomial iterates

Chapter 5. Solution of System of Linear Equations. Module No. 6. Solution of Inconsistent and Ill Conditioned Systems

Weyl group. Chapter locally finite and nilpotent elements

MEM 255 Introduction to Control Systems Review: Basics of Linear Algebra

Irreducible representations of the Witt Jacobson Lie algebra of rank 2

Math 594. Solutions 1

The Order Relation and Trace Inequalities for. Hermitian Operators

Example: (13320, 22140) =? Solution #1: The divisors of are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 27, 30, 36, 41,

Week 2. This week, we covered operations on sets and cardinality.

p-adic Galois representations of G E with Char(E) = p > 0 and the ring R

A p-adic PERRON-FROBENIUS THEOREM

R n α. . The funny symbol indicates DISJOINT union. Define an equivalence relation on this disjoint union by declaring v α R n α, and v β R n β

ON THE EXTENDED HAAGERUP TENSOR PRODUCT IN OPERATOR SPACES. 1. Introduction

= = = (a) Use the MATLAB command rref to solve the system. (b) Let A be the coefficient matrix and B be the right-hand side of the system.

Difference Equations

Ballot Paths Avoiding Depth Zero Patterns

Zeros and Zero Dynamics for Linear, Time-delay System

Math 217 Fall 2013 Homework 2 Solutions

THE CLASS NUMBER THEOREM

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

Transcription:

HOPF ALGEBRAS WITH TRACE AND CLEBSCH-GORDAN COEFFICIENTS CORRADO DE CONCINI Abstract. In ths lecture I shall report on some jont work wth Proces, Reshetkhn and Rosso [1]. 1. Recollectons and the problem Let G be a smply connected semsmple algebrac group over C. g =Le G. T G a maxmal torus, t =Le T, R the root system, R + postve roots, = {α 1,..., α n } the smple roots, A = (a,j ), the Cartan matrx, D =dag(d 1,..., d n ) the dagonal matrx wth DA symmetrc. B T B the correspondng Borel subgroup and ts opposte. Fx l odd (and prme wth 3 f there are G 2 components). Let ε be a prmtve l root of 1. The quantzed envelopng algebra s the C-algebra U ε (g) generated by elements {E 1,... E n }, {F 1,... F n }, K λ, λ X (T ) the character group of T, wth relatons: K λ K µ = K λ+µ K λ E K 1 λ K λ F K 1 λ = ε ˇα,λ E = ε ˇα,λ F E F j = F j E j, [E, F ] = K α Kα 1 [ 1 a j k [ 1 a j k ] ] ε ε ε ε 1 ε = ε d E 1 k aj E j E k = 0, j F 1 k aj F j F k = 0, j [ ] m [m] = ε! h [m h], [h] ε![h] ε! ε! = [h] ε... [2] ε [1] ε and [h] ε = εh ε h ε ε. acts on generators by 1 ε K µ = K µ K µ, E = E 1 + K α E, F = F Kα 1 + 1 F The man pecularty of beng at roots of unty s that U ε (g) has a very bg center Z. Indeed, U ε (g) s a fnte Z-module. Z s the coordnate rng of an algebrac varety X of dmenson equal to dm g. So: 1) Every rreducble U ε (g)-module s fnte dmensonal. 1

2 CORRADO DE CONCINI 2) If Ûε(g) denotes the set of rreducble U ε (g)-modules, takng central characters we get a surjectve map γ : Ûε(g) X. Problem 1. Gven two rreducble U ε (g)-modules, V, W, descrbe the composton factors of V W and ther multplctes. Consder the sub Hopf algebra U ε (b) U ε (g) generated by the K λ and E 1,... E n. Problem 2. Gven an rreducble U ε (g)-module, V decompose ts restrcton to U ε (b). Notce that as Problem 2, also Problem 1 s a problem of branchng. In fact t conssts of decomposng the restrcton of the rreducble U ε (g) U ε (g)-module V W to the subalgebra (U ε (g)). To explan our results recall that Z contans a sub Hopf algebra Z 0 such that U ε (g) s a free Z 0 module of rank l dmg. Z 0 s the coordnate rng of an algebrac group H (the Posson dual of G) whch s the kernel of the homomorphsm p : B B T defned by p((b, b )) = p + (b)p (b ) 1 where p ± are the quotents modulo the unpotent radcals. The ncluson Z 0 Z gves a map π : X H. Theorem 1. There s a non empty Zarsk open set V H H such that f V and W are two rreducble representatons of U ε (g), such that f (h 1, h 2 ) = (πγ(v ), πγ(w )) V, as a U ε (g) module, wth m = l R+ rkg. V W = U (πγ) 1 (h 1h 2)U m As for problem 2, Z 0 + = Z 0 U ε (b) s a sub Hopf algebra of U ε (b). Z 0 + s the coordnate rng of B and the ncluson Z 0 + Z 0 nduces the homomorphsm µ : H B gven by the projecton on the second factor. Agan, takng central character we get a map γ : Ûε(b) B. Theorem 2. There s a non empty Zarsk open set V H such that f V s an rreducble representatons of U ε (g), such that f h = πγ(v ) V, as a U ε (b) module, V = U (γ ) 1 (µ(h))u m wth m = l ( R+ s)/2 where s s the number of orbts of w 0 on the set of smple roots. The man content of these theorems s that n both cases, at least genercally, the multplctes are unformly dstrbuted among the varous rreducble components. 2. Cayley-Hamlton algebras. The results we have just stated follow from a careful study of the centers of the algebras nvolved, by applyng the theory of Cayley-Hamlton algebras whch we now brefly recall. A trace on a algebra R over a feld k (here =C) s a 1-ary operaton t : R R such that (1) t s k lnear. (Ths mples that t(r) s an k subspace) (2) t(a)b = b t(a), a, b R. (Ths mples that t(r) s n the center of R),

HOPF ALGEBRAS WITH TRACE AND CLEBSCH-GORDAN COEFFICIENTS 3 (3) t(ab) = t(ba), a, b R. (Ths mples that t s 0 on the space of commutators [R, R],) (4) t(t(a)b) = t(a)t(b), a, b R. (Ths mples that t(r) s an subalgebra, called the trace algebra, and that t s also t(r) lnear). The most famous example s that of the algebra M n of n n matrces wth the usual trace tr. Algebras wth trace form a category. Gven (R 1, t 1 ), (R 2, t 2 ) a morphsm φ from (R 1, t 1 ) to (R 2, t 2 ) s an algebra homomorphsm such that φt 1 (a) = t 2 φ(a) for each x R 1. A morphsm φ : (R, t) (M n, tr) s called a representaton. (M n, tr) have the followng extra propertes: (1) tr(1) = n (2) Gven A M n, set p (n) a (x) = det (xi A), the characterstc polynomal, then we get the Cayley-Hamlton dentty p (n) a (a) = 0 Remark that p (n) a (x) has coeffcents whch are unversal polynomals n tr(a),..., tr(a n ). For example for n = 2, p (2) a (x) = x 2 tr(a)x + 1 2 (tr(a)2 tr(a 2 )). Thus gven (R, t) we can consder p (n) a (x) for every a R as a polynomal wth coeffcents n the trace algebra and defne Defnton 3. An algebra wth trace (A, t) s a n-cayley Hamlton algebra (or brefly an n-ch algebra) f 1) t(1) = n 2) p (n) a (a) = 0 for all a R. Remark that f ρ : (R, t) (M r, tr) s a representaton of a n C-H algebra, then r = n snce r = tr(1) = tr(ρ(1)) = ρ(t(1)) = ρ(n) = n. If (R, t) n-ch algebra and h s a postve nteger, (R, ht) s a hn-ch algebra and f V s a (n dmensonal) (R, t)-module, V h s a (R, ht)-module. The category of C-H algebras clearly contans free objects. The free n-ch algebra F n x 1,..., x m on m generators s the algebra generated freely by the x s and by traces of monomals modulo the deal generated by evaluatng the n th Cayley Hamlton dentty. 3. Representatons of Cayley-Hamlton algebras. The followng results descrbes the free n-ch algebra F n x 1,..., x m. Consder the algebra C n (ξ 1,..., ξ m ) of GL(n)-equvarant polynomal maps of matrces M n (k) m M n (k), ξ (A 1,..., A m ) = A, wth trace t(ψ) = tr ψ. We have a unversal map F n x 1,..., x m C n (ξ 1,..., ξ m ) Theorem 4. (Proces) (1) The unversal map F n x 1,..., x m C n (ξ 1,..., ξ m )

4 CORRADO DE CONCINI s an somorphsm. (2) The trace algebra T n (ξ 1,..., ξ m ) of the algebra C n (ξ 1,..., ξ m ) s the algebra of nvarants of m tuples of matrces and, f m > 1, t s the center of C n (ξ 1,..., ξ m ). (3) C n (ξ 1,..., ξ m ) s a fnte T n (ξ 1,..., ξ m ) module. The above theorem tells us n partcular that f (R, t) s a n-ch algebra whch s fntely generated also ts trace algebra A s fntely generated and R s a fnte A-module. It follows that every rreducble representaton of R (as an algebra) s fnte dmensonal. A s a rng of functons on an affne algebrac varety X, so f R denotes the set of rreducble representatons of R, we get, by takng central characters, a surjectve map γ : R X. The ponts of X tself are a modul space for a class of representatons. Indeed Theorem 5. Gven a pont x X, there s a unque semsmple, trace compatble, representaton W x of the form W x = V γ 1 (x)v m V, and each semsmple, trace compatble, representaton of R s of ths form. In fact there s a Zarsk open set (possbly empty), called the unramfed locus, n X such that f m x A s the maxmal deal n A, R/m x R s semsmple and so W x s the unque representaton lyng over x whch s compatble wth the trace. If A s the center of R and R satsfes sutable condtons, for example t s a doman, there s a non empty Zarsk open set for whch W x s rreducble. In general however, the determnaton of γ 1 (x) and of the multplctes m V s a very hard problem. If we consder (R, ht), wth h a postve nteger, then the semsmple, trace compatble, representaton correspondng to x X wth respect to the new trace s just W h x. 4. Reduced trace In our example of quantzed envelopng algebra we have no trace, so f we want to use the results about the CH algebras we need to fnd ways to canoncally ntroduce a trace. Here s a way of dong ths under some assumptons. A prme algebra R s an algebra n whch the product of two non-zero deals s non-zero. Let R be a prme algebra, assume that A s a subalgebra of the center and R s an A module of fnte type. Then: 1) A s an ntegral doman. 2) R s a torson free module. So f F s the feld of fractons of A, then R R A F and S := R A F s a fnte dmensonal smple algebra somorphc to M k (D) wth D a fnte dmensonal dvson rng. Denote by Z the center of S and of D. Then dm Z D = h 2.

HOPF ALGEBRAS WITH TRACE AND CLEBSCH-GORDAN COEFFICIENTS 5 If Z s an algebrac closure of Z, M k (D) Z Z = M hk (Z). Settng p := [Z : F ] = dm F Z we also have S F Z = M k (D) F Z = M hk (Z) p The number n := hkp s called degree of S over F. Consder the F lnear operator a L : S S, a L (b) := ab. We defne the reduced trace t S/F (a) = 1 hk tr(al ). Ths theorem tells us that, provded A s ntegrally closed, we have constructed a nce trace: Theorem 6. If S = R A F as before and A s ntegrally closed we have that the reduced trace t S/F maps R nto A, so we wll denote by t R/A the nduced trace. The algebras R and S wth ther reduced trace are n Cayley Hamlton algebras. Even more mportant for us s the fact that, n the stuaton above, the nce trace s essentally unque. Indeed, Theorem 7. Under the same crcumstances of Theorem 6, f τ : R A s any trace for whch R s an m Cayley Hamlton algebra then there s a postve nteger r for whch: m = rn, τ = r t R/A Notce that n partcular, ths mples that f x s a pont n X and W x s the unque semsmple representaton above x, compatble wth t R/A then Wx r s the unque semsmple representaton above x compatble wth τ. 5. Compatblty Snce our fnal goal s to analyze the restrcton of certan representaton of an algebra R to a subalgebra, what I am gong to explan now s how the reduced trace of R relatve to a subrng A restrcts to a subalgebra. Assume that we have two prme algebras R 1 R 2 wth two central subrngs A 1 R 1, A 2 R 2, A 1 A 2 such that R 1 s a fnte A 1 module, R 2 s a fnte A 2 module and A 1, A 2 are ntegrally closed. We have the reduced traces t R1/A 1 and t R2/A 2 for whch both algebras are Cayley-Hamlton. We need a crteron ensurng that the restrcton of t R2/A 2 to R 1 s a multple of t R1/A 1 (n ths case we say that they are compatble). The crteron s the followng, Theorem 8. Denote by Z 1 the center of R 1. If the algebra Z 1 A1 A 2 s a doman there s a postve nteger r such that r t R1/A 1 = t R2/A 2 on R 1. 6. Back to quantum algebras In ths fnal secton I am gong to explan how the theory of Cayley Hamlton algebras can be appled to the quantum group stuaton descrbed n Secton 1. As a frst step we need to show that quantzed envelopng algebras have reduced traces. Ths s not hard. One knows that both U ε (g) and U ε (b) are domans and

6 CORRADO DE CONCINI hence prme and that ther centers Z, Z are ntegrally closed. Z 0 and Z + 0 are clearly ntegrally closed, so we have reduced traces t Uε(g)/Z 0 t Uε(g)/Z t U ε(g) 2 /Z 2 t U ε(b)/z +. 0 Next we have to compare them. We start wth Problem 1 and the ncluson (U ε (g)) U ε (g) U ε (g). Unfortunately we have that (Z) s not contaned n Z Z. On the other hand the fact that Z 0 s a sub Hopf algebra means that (Z 0 ) Z 0 Z 0 Z Z. So, we may try to compare t Uε(g) 2 /Z 2 wth t U ε(g)/z 0. In order to use Theorem 8 we need to show that the varety X defned as the fber product φ X X q π π π X X H H m H. wth m : H H H the group multplcaton, s rreducble. Let us recall that X s obtaned as the fber product X π H p T/W l ρ G σ G//G = T/W. Where for (h, k) H, ρ((h, k)) = hk 1, σ s the quotent modulo the adjont acton, W s the Weyl group and the map l s the map nduced by the homomorphsm t t l of the torus T on W -nvarants. Puttng the two dagrams together we obtan X as the fber product From ths one proves: X q X X pφ σ ρ m π π T/W l T/W. Step 1. X s a complete ntersecton over X X whch s Cohen-Macaulay so t s Cohen-Macaulay. Step 2. normal. X s non sngular n codmenson 1 so n partcular t s reduced and Step 3. X s connected. Ths s the hardest step and one needs to use a varaton of Stenberg secton for the quotent G G//G (G//G denoted the categorcal quotent defned usng nvarant polynomal functons ). Usng the rreducblty of X we deduce that the restrcton to (Uε (g)) of t Uε(g) 2 /Z 2 s mt U ε(g)/z 0 wth m = l R+ rkg and Theorem 1 follows. The open set V H H conssts of the set of pars ((h 1, k 1 ), (h 2, k 2 )) wth h 1 k1 1, h 2k2 1, h 1h 2 k2 1 k 1 1 all regular semsmple. The soluton to Problem 2 s qute smlar wth the extra dffculty that one has to compute the center of U ε (b) frst snce ths has not been determned before. We have seen that Z 0 + s the coordnate rng of the group B. For a domnant weght λ, consder the rreducble G-module V λ of hghest weght λ. Take a hghest weght vector v V λ, a hghest weght vector φ and a lowest vector ψ n Vλ. Defne the

HOPF ALGEBRAS WITH TRACE AND CLEBSCH-GORDAN COEFFICIENTS 7 functon f λ (b) = φ(bv)ψ(bv) for b B. These functons generate a subrng Z n Z + 0, somorphc to the polynomal rng C[f ω 1,..., f ωr ], ω the fundamental weghts. Embed Z nto the polynomal rng Z = C[f 1/l ω 1,..., f 1/l ω r ]. Z s the rng of nvarants n Z under an obvous acton of the group Z/lZ whch we can consder as the group T l of l-torson ponts n T. Set Γ = {t T l t w0 = t 1 }. and Z + 1 = (Z ) Γ. Theorem 9. The center of the algebra U ε (b) s somorphc to Z + = Z + 0 Z Z + 1. Once we know the center of U ε (b), n order to solve Problem 2 we need to compare t Uε(g)/Z and t Uε(b)/Z +. In order to use Theorem 8 we need to show that 0 the fber product Ỹ Ỹ Y q X π H l p B wth Y =Spec Z +, s a rreducble varety. Ths s done as n the prevous case. After these facts have been establshed the proof of Theorem 2 follows rather easly. 7. Fnal remarks and problems The technque explaned can be used n other cases. One example s the so called quantzed functon algebra F ε [G]. In ths case the role played by H s played by G and we have a projecton π : F ε [G] G. Theorem 10. There s a non empty Zarsk open set V G G such that f V and W are two rreducble representatons of F ε [G], such that f (g 1, g 2 ) = (π(v ), π(w )) V, as a F ε [G] module, wth m = l R+ rkg. V W = U (π) 1 (g 1g 2)U m References [1] De Concn, C.; Proces, C.; Reshetkhn, N.; Rosso, M. Hopf algebras wth trace and representatons. Invent. Math. 161 (2005), no. 1, 1 44.