Notes on Renormalization Group: ϕ 4 theory and ferromagnetism

Similar documents
Notes on Renormalization Group: Introduction

Notes on Renormalization Group: Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition and Sine-Gordon model

Fermi Liquid and BCS Phase Transition

8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum phase transitions of insulators, superconductors and metals in two dimensions

Renormalization Group: non perturbative aspects and applications in statistical and solid state physics.

Quantum Phase Transitions in Fermi Liquids

Theory of Elementary Particles homework VIII (June 04)

Quantum Field Theory II

Ginzburg-Landau Theory of Type II Superconductors

Kolloquium Universität Innsbruck October 13, The renormalization group: from the foundations to modern applications

Phase Transitions and Renormalization:

MCRG Flow for the Nonlinear Sigma Model

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 26 May 2000

Lecture Notes, Field Theory in Condensed Matter Physics: Quantum Criticality and the Renormalization Group

XY model in 2D and 3D

the renormalization group (RG) idea

REVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum Field Theory II

Chap.9 Fixed points and exponents

Effective Field Theory for Cold Atoms I

1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator

21 Renormalization group

Landau s Fermi Liquid Theory

Review of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10

Mesonic and nucleon fluctuation effects in nuclear medium

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:

Mesonic and nucleon fluctuation effects at finite baryon density

Introduction to Renormalization Group

Asymptotically free nonabelian Higgs models. Holger Gies

Reaction-Diffusion Problems

Why Be Natural? Jonathan Bain. Department of Technology, Culture and Society Tandon School of Engineering, New York University Brooklyn, New York

Introduction to Renormalization

Unitarity, Dispersion Relations, Cutkosky s Cutting Rules

8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II

Ginzburg-Landau Theory of Phase Transitions

QFT at finite Temperature

LSZ reduction for spin-1/2 particles

REVIEW REVIEW. A guess for a suitable initial state: Similarly, let s consider a final state: Summary of free theory:

6.1 Quadratic Casimir Invariants

Finite Temperature Field Theory

8.334: Statistical Mechanics II Spring 2014 Test 2 Review Problems

Physics 212: Statistical mechanics II Lecture XI

Regularization Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

PHYS 611, SPR 12: HOMEWORK NO. 4 Solution Guide

lattice that you cannot do with graphene! or... Antonio H. Castro Neto

Self-consistent Conserving Approximations and Renormalization in Quantum Field Theory at Finite Temperature

Analytic continuation of functional renormalization group equations

Critical Region of the QCD Phase Transition

cond-mat/ Mar 1995

RG Limit Cycles (Part I)

Vacuum Energy and Effective Potentials

Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and the Higgs Mechanism

8.821 F2008 Lecture 13: Masses of fields and dimensions of operators

Renormalizability in (noncommutative) field theories

Problem set for the course Skálázás és renormálás a statisztikus fizikában, 2014

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS

Phase transitions in Hubbard Model

Attractor Structure of Gauged Nambu-Jona-Lasinio Model

NATURAL SCIENCES TRIPOS. Past questions. EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL PHYSICS Minor Topics. (27 February 2010)

DR.RUPNATHJI( DR.RUPAK NATH )

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

Light-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics

A Brief Introduction to Linear Response Theory with Examples in Electromagnetic Response

8.324 Quantum Field Theory II. Problem Set 7 Solutions. d λ dλ

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 16 Dec 2017

PION DECAY CONSTANT AT FINITE TEMPERATURE IN THE NONLINEAR SIGMA MODEL

Theory toolbox. Chapter Chiral effective field theories

Gell-Mann - Oakes - Renner relation in a magnetic field at finite temperature.

Renormalization Group for the Two-Dimensional Ising Model

Collective Effects. Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Physics

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 25 Feb 2002

3. Quantum matter without quasiparticles

Renormalization of the Yukawa Theory Physics 230A (Spring 2007), Hitoshi Murayama

Phys460.nb Back to our example. on the same quantum state. i.e., if we have initial condition (5.241) ψ(t = 0) = χ n (t = 0)

Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories

Symmetry Factors of Feynman Diagrams for Scalar Fields

Renormalization of microscopic Hamiltonians. Renormalization Group without Field Theory

1 Potential due to a charged wire/sheet

Quantum criticality of Fermi surfaces

Scale without conformal invariance

TRANSIZIONI DI FASE QUANTISTICHE. Ettore Vicari

2 Post-Keplerian Timing Parameters for General Relativity

Loop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51

Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

Complex Systems Methods 9. Critical Phenomena: The Renormalization Group

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 2 Mar 1997

Holographic Wilsonian Renormalization Group

Calculating cross-sections in Compton scattering processes

TENTATIVE SYLLABUS INTRODUCTION

Leptogenesis via Higgs Condensate Relaxation

Andrea Marini. Introduction to the Many-Body problem (I): the diagrammatic approach

Introduction to the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Transition

Universal phase transitions in Topological lattice models

0 T (L int (x 1 )...L int (x n )) = i

Lecture notes on topological insulators

On the quantum Boltzmann equation

Electronic quasiparticles and competing orders in the cuprate superconductors

Modern Statistical Mechanics Paul Fendley

ĝ r = {R v} r = R r + v.

Transcription:

Notes on Renormalization Group: ϕ 4 theory and ferromagnetism Yi Zhou (Dated: November 4, 015) In this lecture, we shall study the ϕ 4 theory up to one-loop RG and discuss the application to ferromagnetic transition. I. QUARTIC PERTURBATION TO GAUSSIAN MODEL: THE ϕ 4 THEORY Now we consider the quartic perturbation to the Gaussian model δs = 1 4! 1 4! 4 k <Λ i=1 k <Λ d D k i (π) D u( k 4 k3 k k1 )ϕ ( k 4 )ϕ ( k 3 )ϕ( k )ϕ( k 1 )δ D ( k 4 + k 3 k k 1 ) u(431)ϕ (4)ϕ (3)ϕ()ϕ(1), where the coupling function obeys the symmetry condition The RG transformation can be done through Linked expansion will give rise to u(431) = u(341) = u(431). e S ϕ <] = e S0ϕ<] e δsϕ<,ϕ] 0 e S0 δs. δs = δs 1 ( δs δs ) +. Since δs u, the above is a perturbation expansion and can be evaluated through Feynman diagrams. Linked expansion where c denotes connected average. ln e U = U + 1 U c + + ( 1)n n! U n c, The leading term has the form δs = 1 u(431) (ϕ < + ϕ ) 4 4! (ϕ < + ϕ ) 3 (ϕ < + ϕ ) (ϕ < + ϕ ) 1. k <Λ 0 There are possible monomials, 8 terms with odd number of fast ϕ modes, 1 term with all fast ϕ modes, 1 term with all slow ϕ < modes (called tree-level), 6 terms with two fast ϕ and two slow ϕ < modes. The first set will vanish by symmetry and the second set will make a constant contribution, independent of ϕ <, to the effective action. Consider the third set will all slow modes, say, the tree-level terms in field theory, and rewrite it in terms of new momenta and fields, we find that δs 4,tree = 1 4 d D k i 4! k < Λ i=1 (π) D u( k 4 k3 k k1 )ϕ ( k 4 )ϕ ( k 3 )ϕ( k )ϕ( k 1 )δ D ( k 4 + k 3 k k 1 ) = 1 4 4! ζ4 b 3D d D k i k <Λ i=1 (π) D u( k 4/b, k 3/b, k /b, k 1/b)ϕ ( k 4)ϕ ( k 3)ϕ ( k )ϕ ( k 1)δ D ( k 4 + k 3 k k 1) = 1 4 d D k 4! b4 D i k <Λ (π) D u( k 4/b, k 3/b, k /b, k 1/b)ϕ ( k 4)ϕ ( k 3)ϕ ( k )ϕ ( k 1)δ D ( k 4 + k 3 k k 1). i=1

So that Carrying out the Taylor expansion, we see that b 4 D u( k 4/b, k 3/b, k /b, k 1/b) = u ( k 4, k 3, k, k 1). u = u 0 + u 1 k + u k +, u 0 = b 4 D u 0, u 1 = b 3 D u 1, u = b D u, and so on and so forth. It is clear that when D = 4, only u 0 is marginal and other terms are irrelevant. This is why the ϕ 4 theory in D = 4 is described by a coupling constant and not a coupling function. For D 4, all the ϕ 4 terms are irrelevant. Homework: Analyze the relevance of operators ϕ n, n 4 in different dimensions D. II. ONE-LOOP RG FOR THE ϕ 4 THEORY According to previous tree-level analysis, higher gradient terms are irrelevant, we consider the following simplified model, in D-dimension, 1 Sϕ] = d D r ( ϕ) + 1 rϕ + ] 4! ϕ4 hϕ, where h is the external magnetic field. By seperating ϕ = ϕ < + ϕ, up to the one-loop, we have Sϕ] = S < ϕ < ] + S ϕ ] + S I ϕ <, ϕ ], with 1 S < ϕ < ] = d D r ( ϕ <) + r ϕ < + ] 4! ϕ4 < hϕ <, 1 S ϕ ] = d D r ( ϕ ) + r ] ϕ, S I ϕ <, ϕ ] = d D r ϕ 4 <ϕ + ], where we only keep the ϕ <ϕ term at one-loop level. (It is also easy to verify that other terms will lead to two-loop contribution at leading order.) Thus, the effective action is given by the following connected diagrams contribution S ϕ < ] = S < ϕ < ] + S I ϕ <, ϕ ] 1 where the sbuscript c denotes a connected average. The first order average reads S I ϕ <, ϕ ] = 4 The integral can be computed by expanding r to the first order, SI ϕ <, ϕ ] c, d D p 1 d D p (π) D r + p < (π) D ϕ <( p)ϕ < ( p). d D p (π) D 1 r + p = I 1 ri,

3 with where I α = d D p (π) D 1 p α = Ω D Λ D α 1 b 1 dpp D 1 α = Ω DΛ D α D α (1 bα D ), Ω D = (π) D Γ( D )(π)d is the volume of the D-dimensional unit sphere. So that by the momenta and field scaling, S () ϕ ] = b r + Ω D (D ) (1 b D ) rω ] D (D 4) (1 b4 D ) d D rϕ. The second order will lead to the contribution proportional to ϕ 4 <, 1 SI ϕ <, ϕ ] c d D rϕ 4 d D q 1 < (π) D (r + q ) = I d D rϕ 4 < + O( r). Evaluating the integral and rescaling, we have the S (4) ϕ ] as follows, Finally, the linear term after rescaling reads S (4) ϕ ] = b 4 D ( 4! Ω D S (1) ϕ ] = hb 1+ D 1 b 4 D D 4 d D rϕ. Thus, to the one-loop order, the coupling constants scale as follows, r b r + Ω D (D ) (1 b D ) rω D b 4 D ( 3 Ω D h hb 1+ D. 1 b 4 D D 4 ), ) d D rϕ 4. ] (D 4) (1 b4 D ), ϵ-expansion: It is interesting that ϵ = 4 D can serves an expansion paramter. We set D = 4 ϵ and evaluate the above to leading order of ϵ. With Ω 4 ϵ Ω 4 = 1 8π. Therefore, r b r + 3π (1 b ) r ] π ln b, ) (1 + ϵ ln b) ( 3 π ln b, h hb 3 ϵ/. Setting b = e l, we have the Gell-Mann-Low equations dr d dh = r + π r 8π, = ϵ 3 π, = 6 ϵ h. We find that one-loop correction will not affect the scaling behavior of h. We shall consider the simple case with h = 0 and analyze the RG flow for r and at first. The β-function β() = ϵ 3 π exhibits different behaviors for ϵ 0 and ϵ < 0. When ϵ < 0, there is only one trivial fixed point. While for ϵ 0, there exists a non-trivial fixed point.

Fixed point: The fixed points are given by r + π r 8π = 0, ϵ 3 π = 0. Gaussian fixed point: a trival fixed point is Gaussian fixed point given by r = = 0. The W -matrix is ( ) W =. ϵ Non-Gaussian fixed point: a nontrivial fixed point is given by r = ϵ 6, 4 Around this fixed point, we have = π 3 ϵ. The critical exponent can be computed as follows, y t = ϵ 3, y h = 6 ϵ. α = ϵ 3, β = 1 ϵ 6, γ = 1 + ϵ 6, δ = 3 + ϵ, η = 0, ν = 1 + ϵ. Phase diagram ε <0 ε 0 Paramagnetic Paramagnetic Ferromagnetic r Ferromagnetic r FIG. 1: Phase digrams of the ϕ 4 model from ϵ-expansion. 1] John Cardy, Scaling and renormalization group in statistical physics, Cambridge Univsersity Press (1996).

] M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An introduction to quantum field theory, Westview Press (1995). 3] Alexander Altland and Ben Simons, Condensed Matter Field theory, Cambridge Univsersity Press (010). 4] R. Shankar, Renormalization-group approach to interacting fermions, Review of Modern Physics, 66, 19 (1994). 5] John B. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979). 5