LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT

Similar documents
DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 16-17, JULY 14-17

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

4.7 The Levi-Civita connection and parallel transport

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY CLASS NOTES INSTRUCTOR: F. MARQUES. September 25, 2015

Math 6455 Nov 1, Differential Geometry I Fall 2006, Georgia Tech

LECTURE 9: MOVING FRAMES IN THE NONHOMOGENOUS CASE: FRAME BUNDLES. 1. Introduction

LECTURE 16: CONJUGATE AND CUT POINTS

Chapter 12. Connections on Manifolds

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY

The existence of light-like homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous Lorentzian manifolds. Sao Paulo, 2013

Metrics and Holonomy

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. School of Mathematical Sciences Colloquium University of Adelaide, May 7, /15

Notes on the Riemannian Geometry of Lie Groups

Hadamard s Theorem. Rich Schwartz. September 10, The purpose of these notes is to prove the following theorem.

LECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES

LECTURE 5: SMOOTH MAPS. 1. Smooth Maps

Lecture 8. Connections

LECTURE 14: LIE GROUP ACTIONS

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURE 12-13,

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012

5.2 The Levi-Civita Connection on Surfaces. 1 Parallel transport of vector fields on a surface M

PICARD S THEOREM STEFAN FRIEDL

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström

Introduction to Poincare Conjecture and the Hamilton-Perelman program

Flat complex connections with torsion of type (1, 1)

Chapter 3. Riemannian Manifolds - I. The subject of this thesis is to extend the combinatorial curve reconstruction approach to curves

Choice of Riemannian Metrics for Rigid Body Kinematics

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

Affine Connections: Part 2

Euler Characteristic of Two-Dimensional Manifolds

HOMEWORK 2 - RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY. 1. Problems In what follows (M, g) will always denote a Riemannian manifold with a Levi-Civita connection.

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES

A Study of Riemannian Geometry

Mathematical methods to capture shape

LECTURE 26: THE CHERN-WEIL THEORY

Riemannian geometry of surfaces

Isometries, Local Isometries, Riemannian Coverings and Submersions, Killing Vector Fields

Isometries, Local Isometries, Riemannian Coverings and Submersions, Killing Vector Fields

CS 468, Lecture 11: Covariant Differentiation

BOUNDED RIEMANNIAN SUBMERSIONS

Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds

NON POSITIVELY CURVED METRIC IN THE SPACE OF POSITIVE DEFINITE INFINITE MATRICES

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

BERGMAN KERNEL ON COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

WITTEN HELLFER SJÖSTRAND THEORY. 1.DeRham Hodge Theorem. 2.WHS-Theorem. 3.Mathematics behind WHS-Theorem. 4.WHS-Theorem in the presence of.

KUIPER S THEOREM ON CONFORMALLY FLAT MANIFOLDS

Observer dependent background geometries arxiv:

On homogeneous Randers spaces with Douglas or naturally reductive metrics

Linear Ordinary Differential Equations

Part IB Geometry. Theorems. Based on lectures by A. G. Kovalev Notes taken by Dexter Chua. Lent 2016

PREISSMAN S THEOREM ALEXANDER GRANT

Math 426H (Differential Geometry) Final Exam April 24, 2006.

Tangent bundles, vector fields

Jacobi fields. Introduction to Riemannian Geometry Prof. Dr. Anna Wienhard und Dr. Gye-Seon Lee

INTRO TO SUBRIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

1 First and second variational formulas for area

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

Differential Geometry of Surfaces

Let F be a foliation of dimension p and codimension q on a smooth manifold of dimension n.

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

arxiv: v4 [math.dg] 10 Feb 2018

Definition 5.1. A vector field v on a manifold M is map M T M such that for all x M, v(x) T x M.

The Hodge Star Operator

12. Linear systems Theorem Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an A-morphism then L = φ O P n

Argument shift method and sectional operators: applications to differential geometry

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

Global aspects of Lorentzian manifolds with special holonomy

Lecture Notes a posteriori for Math 201

THE GEOMETRY OF OPEN MANIFOLDS OF NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Kristopher R. Tapp

H-projective structures and their applications

1 Euclidean geometry. 1.1 The metric on R n

Distances, volumes, and integration

Compact Riemannian manifolds with exceptional holonomy

A crash course the geometry of hyperbolic surfaces

OBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES

Differential Geometry II Lecture 1: Introduction and Motivation

Vectors. January 13, 2013

zi z i, zi+1 z i,, zn z i. z j, zj+1 z j,, zj 1 z j,, zn

Rough metrics, the Kato square root problem, and the continuity of a flow tangent to the Ricci flow

Notes by Maksim Maydanskiy.

AFFINE IMAGES OF RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS

The Calabi Conjecture

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.

MATH 4030 Differential Geometry Lecture Notes Part 4 last revised on December 4, Elementary tensor calculus

Lecture 11. Geodesics and completeness

Chapter 14. Basics of The Differential Geometry of Surfaces. Introduction. Parameterized Surfaces. The First... Home Page. Title Page.

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

Minimizing properties of geodesics and convex neighborhoods

Intrinsic Differential Geometry with Geometric Calculus

7 Curvature of a connection

4 Riemannian geometry

On the dynamics of a rigid body in the hyperbolic space

Curvature homogeneity of type (1, 3) in pseudo-riemannian manifolds

Introduction to Differential Geometry

Transcription:

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT 1. The parallel transport We shall start with the geometric meaning of linear connections. Suppose M is a smooth manifold with a linear connection. Let γ : [a, b] M be an embedded smooth curve in M, and let X be any vector field on M. We will call the energy of X along γ. E(X, γ) = b a γ(t) X 2 dt. Definition 1.1. We say a vector field X is parallel along γ if for all t. γ(t) X = 0 Example. Let M = R n with the standard Euclidean space, with standard linear connection such that X Y = X(Y j ) j. Let γ be any curve and X be a vector field. Recall that as a vector at γ(t), γ(t) = dγ( d ). So for X to be parallel along γ, dt we need 0 = γ(t) X = γ(t)(x i ) i = d dt (Xi γ) i. It follows that X is parallel along γ if and only if X i s are constants on γ, i.e. if and only if X is a constant vector field along γ. Theorem 1.2. For any curve γ : [a, b] M, any t 0 [a, b] and any X 0 T γ(t0 )M, there exists a unique vector field X along γ which is parallel, such that X(γ(t 0 )) = X 0. Proof. [It is enough to prove the theorem for the case when the curve lies in one coordinate patch, since the general case follows from this local existence/uniqueness and a standard compactness argument.] Suppose in a local coordinate system, X 0 = X0 j j γ(t0 ). To find the parallel vector field X = X j j, we need to solve the equation 0 = γ(t) (X j j ) = dxj (γ(t)) j + X j (γ(t)) γ(t) j dt If we let f j (t) = X j (γ(t)) and let a ij (t) be such that γ(t) k = a kj (t) j, then we get a system of linear ODEs f j(t) + f k (t)a kj (t) = 0, 1 1 j m

2 LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT with initial conditions f j (t 0 ) = X0. j Now apply the classical existence and uniqueness results in ODE. Definition 1.3. We will call the map t 0,t : T γ(t0 )M T γ(t) M, X 0 = X(γ(0)) X(γ(t)) the parallel transport from γ(t 0 ) to γ(t) along γ, where X is the parallel vector field along γ such that X(γ(t 0 )) = X 0. Remark. Any immersed curve can be divided into pieces such that each piece is an embedded curve. So the parallel transport can be defined along immersed curves. Lemma 1.4. Any parallel transport t 0,t is a linear isomorphism. Proof. The linearity comes from the fact that the solution of a homogeneous linear ODE system depends linearly on initial data (the superposition principle). t 0,t is invertible since t 0,tP γ a+b t,a+b t 0 = Id, where γ is the opposite curve ( γ)(s) = γ(a + b s). We just see that from any linear connection one gets families of parallel transports which are isomorphisms. Conversely, is totally determined by its parallel transports. Proposition 1.5. Let γ : [a, b] M be a smooth curve on M such that γ(t 0 ) = p and γ(t 0 ) = X 0 T p M. Then for any vector field Y Γ(T M), ( t X0 Y (p) = lim 0,t) 1 (Y (γ(t))) Y (γ(t 0 )) t t0 t t 0 Proof. Let {e 1,, e m } be a basis of T p M. Let e i (t) = t 0,t(e i ). Then by the previous lemma, {e 1 (t),, e m (t)} is a basis of T γ(t) M. So there exist functions X i (t) along curve γ so that Y (γ(t)) = Y i (t)e i (t). It follows that So ( t lim 0,t) 1 (Y (γ(t))) Y (p) t t 0 t t 0 On the other hand side, so the conclusion follows. ( t 0,t) 1 (Y (γ(t))) = Y i (t)e i. = lim t t0 Y i (t)e i Y (p) t t 0 = Ẏ i (t 0 )e i. X0 Y (p) = ( X0 Y i )(p)e i + Y i (t 0 ) X0 e i (t 0 ) = Ẏ i (t 0 )e i, Remark. We used linear connection to define parallel transport. One could also use parallel transport to define its linear connection, i.e. one can define a parallel transport to be a family of linear isomorphisms { } that satisfies several axioms:

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT 3 (1) 1γ 2 = 1 2. (2) P γ = ( ) 1. (3) depends smoothly on γ. (4) If γ 1 (0) = γ 2 (0), γ 1 (0) = γ 2 (0), then for any X 0 T γ1 (0), d dt t=0 1 0,t(X 0 ) = d dt t=0 2 0,t(X 0 ). and then define linear connection via the formula in proposition above. One can check that the parallel transport of a linear connection satisfies the above four axioms, and conversely a set of parallel transport satisfying the previous four axioms does define a linear connection. Still let M be a smooth manifold, and a linear connection on M. Let γ be a loop based at p M, i.e. γ : [0, 1] M is a piecewise smooth curve in M with γ(0) = γ(1) = p. Then we have already seen that the map = 0,1 : T p M T p M is invertible, i.e. GL(T p M). Moreover, if γ 1, γ 2 are two loops based at p, then γ = γ 1 γ 2 defined by jointing γ 1 and γ 2 is also a loop, and = 2 1. Obviously if we take γ be the constant loop, then is the identity map in T p M. So the set of all s form a subgroup of GL(T p M). Definition 1.6. The holonomy group of based at p M is Hol p (M, ) = { γ is a loop based at p} GL(T p M). Here are some basic properties of the holonomy groups which we will not prove in this course: Proposition 1.7. Let be a linear connection on M, p, q M, and γ a piecewise smooth curve from p to q. (1) Hol p (M, ) is a Lie subgroup of GL(T p M). (2) Hol q (M, ) = Hol p (M, )( ) 1. (3) If M is simply connected, then Hol p (M, ) is connected. As a first application of parallel transport, we can prove the following result that was used last time: Proposition 1.8. Let M be a smooth manifold, be a linear connection whose curvature tensor R = 0. Then near any point p, one can find a flat frame, i.e. find a set of vector fields X 1,, X m on a neighborhood U of p such that (1) [frame] {X i (q) 1 i m} form a basis of T q M for every q U, (2) [flatness] Y X i = 0 for all i and for all vector field Y. Proof. Without loss of generality, we may take U to be a coordinate neighborhood and p = (0,, 0) the origin. We let X i (p) = i p. Then they form a

4 LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT basis of T p M. We extend X i to the line {(a, 0,, 0)} by parallelly transporting the vector X i (p) along the curve γ 0 (t) = (t, 0,, 0). Then we extend further to the plane {(a, b, 0,, 0)} by parallelly transporting each X i (γ 0 (a)) along γ a (t) = (a, t, 0,, 0). Repeat this procedure, we get a set of smooth vector fields {X 1,, X m } on the whole of U. By construction, they are a frame. It remains to prove the flatness. First by construction, we have 1 X i = 0 at any point on the line (a, 0,, 0). 2 X i = 0 at any point on the plane (a, b, 0,, 0). Moreover, since R = 0 and [ 1, 2 ] = 0, we get 2 1 X i = 1 2 X i = 0 on the plane (a, b, 0,, 0). As a consequence, 1 X i is parallel along each line γ a (t) = (a, t, 0,, 0), with initial condition ( 1 X i )(a, 0,, 0) = 0. By uniqueness, one must have 1 X i = 0 along each γ a. In other words, we get 1 X i = 0, 2 X i = 0 at any point on the plane (a, b, 0,, 0). By the same argument, we get 1 X i = 0, 2 X i = 0, 3 X i = 0 at any point of the form (a, b, c, 0,, 0). Continue this argument, one can see that j X i = 0 for all i, j, at all points in U. As a consequence, X 1,, X m are flat. Note: in proposition 1.8 don t require M to be a Riemannian manifold! 2. The parallel transport on Riemannian manifolds Now suppose (M, g) is a Riemannian manifold, and a metric-compatible linear connection. In other words, for all X, Y, Z Γ(T M), X Y, Z = X Y, Z + Y, X Z. So if X, Y are vector fields parallel along a curve γ, then d dt X(γ(t)), Y (γ(t)) = γ(t)( X, Y ) = γ(t)x, Y + X, γ(t) Y = 0. Thus we get Lemma 2.1. If X, Y are both parallel along γ, then X, Y is a constant on γ. As an immediate consequence, we see that if (M, g) is a flat Riemannian manifold, then the flat local frame in proposition 1.8 can be taken to be a flat orthonormal local frame. For a Riemannian manifold, each tangent space T p M is not only a linear space, but a linear space with inner product. So for a linear map like, we would be interested in the question that whether it preserves the inner product structure.

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT 5 Proposition 2.2. A linear connection on M is a compatible with g if and only if all of its parallel transports t 0,t are isometries between T γ(t0 )M and T γ(t) M. Proof. Let be a metric-compatible linear connection, γ a curve, and {e i } an orthonormal basis at γ(t 0 ), then t 0,t(e i ), t 0,t(e j ) = e i, e j. So t 0,t is an isometry. Conversely, suppose is a linear connection such that t 0,t are isometries. For any vector fields X, Y, Z Γ(T M), and any p M, take a curve γ such that γ(t 0 ) = p and γ(t 0 ) = X p. Take an orthonormal basis {e i } at T p M. Along γ we denote Y = Y i (t)e i (t) and Z = Z i (t)e i (t). Then along γ. So Y, Z = Y i (t)z i (t) Xp Y, Z = ( Xp Y i (t))z i (0) + Y i (0)X p (Z i (t)) = Xp Y, Z p + Y p, Xp Z. This completes the proof. As a corollary, we get Corollary 2.3. If (M, g) is a Riemannian manifold and is a linear connection that is compatible with g, then Hol p (M, ) O(T p M).