On Special Geometry of Generalized G Structures and Flux Compactifications. Hu Sen, USTC. Hangzhou-Zhengzhou, 2007

Similar documents
Generalized N = 1 orientifold compactifications

String Theory Compactifications with Background Fluxes

Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes

String Theory and Generalized Geometries

Exact solutions in supergravity

A Landscape of Field Theories

Yet Another Alternative to Compactification

Heterotic type IIA duality with fluxes and moduli stabilization

Heterotic Geometry and Fluxes

Yet Another Alternative to Compactification by Heterotic Five-branes

Elements of Topological M-Theory

Heterotic Torsional Backgrounds, from Supergravity to CFT

Katrin Becker, Texas A&M University. Strings 2016, YMSC,Tsinghua University

String Phenomenology ???

Generalising Calabi Yau Geometries

Flux Compactification of Type IIB Supergravity

Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION. Special Geometry. Yang Zhang. Abstract: N = 2 Supergravity. based on hep-th/ , Boris PiolineA

Interpolating geometries, fivebranes and the Klebanov-Strassler theory

Topological reduction of supersymmetric gauge theories and S-duality

Citation for published version (APA): de Wit, T. C. (2003). Domain-walls and gauged supergravities Groningen: s.n.

SUPERSTRING REALIZATIONS OF SUPERGRAVITY IN TEN AND LOWER DIMENSIONS. John H. Schwarz. Dedicated to the memory of Joël Scherk

A Supergravity Dual for 4d SCFT s Universal Sector

BPS Black holes in AdS and a magnetically induced quantum critical point. A. Gnecchi

MIFPA PiTP Lectures. Katrin Becker 1. Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. 1

A Higher Derivative Extension of the Salam-Sezgin Model from Superconformal Methods

Intro to Geometry and Topology via G Physics and G 2 -manifolds. Bobby Samir Acharya. King s College London. and ICTP Trieste Ψ(1 γ 5 )Ψ

Some Geometrical Problems in AdS/CFT

AdS spacetimes and Kaluza-Klein consistency. Oscar Varela

D-branes on generalized complex flux vacua

Dynamics of Multiple Kaluza-Klein Monopoles in M- and String Theory

Simon Salamon. Turin, 24 April 2004

Dualities and Topological Strings

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 9 Feb 1999

Dimensional reduction

Pietro Fre' SISSA-Trieste. Paolo Soriani University degli Studi di Milano. From Calabi-Yau manifolds to topological field theories

Lifshitz Geometries in String and M-Theory

Bobby Samir Acharya Kickoff Meeting for Simons Collaboration on Special Holonomy

8.821 String Theory Fall 2008

Quantization of gravity, giants and sound waves p.1/12

Half BPS solutions in type IIB and M-theory

2d N = (2, 2) supersymmetry with U(1) RV in curved space

F-theory effective physics via M-theory. Thomas W. Grimm!! Max Planck Institute for Physics (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut)! Munich

Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime

Maximally Supersymmetric Solutions in Supergravity

Exact results in AdS/CFT from localization. Part I

Black Hole Entropy in the presence of Chern-Simons terms

Non-Geometric Calabi- Yau Backgrounds

Heterotic Flux Compactifications

Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee

Counting black hole microstates as open string flux vacua

Singular Monopoles and Instantons on Curved Backgrounds

A Short Note on D=3 N=1 Supergravity

Entropy of asymptotically flat black holes in gauged supergravit

Generalized Cohomologies and Supersymmetry

2 Type IIA String Theory with Background Fluxes in d=2

Particles and Strings Probing the Structure of Matter and Space-Time

Twistor Strings, Gauge Theory and Gravity. Abou Zeid, Hull and Mason hep-th/

Topological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons

Moduli of heterotic G2 compactifications

David R. Morrison. String Phenomenology 2008 University of Pennsylvania 31 May 2008

Calabi-Yau Fourfolds with non-trivial Three-Form Cohomology

Gravitational anomaly and fundamental forces

Supercurrents. Nathan Seiberg IAS

Théorie des cordes: quelques applications. Cours IV: 11 février 2011

Small Black Strings/Holes

All symmetric AdS n>2 solutions of type II supergravity

String Theory II GEORGE SIOPSIS AND STUDENTS

Quantum Dynamics of Supergravity

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 22 Jul 2003

arxiv: v3 [hep-th] 22 Sep 2014

Brane world scenarios

Holographic Anyons in the ABJM theory

First Year Seminar. Dario Rosa Milano, Thursday, September 27th, 2012

Generalized Calabi-Yau compactifications with D-branes and fluxes

The Phase Diagram of the BMN Matrix Model

Curiosités géométriques et physique de l'univers

Open String Wavefunctions in Flux Compactifications. Fernando Marchesano

Instantons in (deformed) gauge theories from strings

Contents. Preface to the second edition. Preface to the first edition. Part I Introduction to gravity and supergravity 1

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 14 Oct 1997

Mirrored K3 automorphisms and non-geometric compactifications

GRAVITATION F10. Lecture Maxwell s Equations in Curved Space-Time 1.1. Recall that Maxwell equations in Lorentz covariant form are.

Strings and Black Holes

Geometry and classification of string AdS backgrounds

Six-dimensional Origin of N = 4 SYM with Duality Defects

Chiral matter wavefunctions in warped compactifications

Exact Results in D=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories And Applications

Instantons in string theory via F-theory

Lecturer: Bengt E W Nilsson

Fabio Riccioni. 17th July 2018 New Frontiers in String Theory 2018 Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto

Exact Half-BPS Solutions in Type IIB and M-theory

String Theory. A general overview & current hot topics. Benjamin Jurke. Würzburg January 8th, 2009

Ten and eleven dimensional perspectives on N=2 black holes

Introduction. Chapter Why string theory?

8.821 F2008 Lecture 05

Black Hole Entropy and Gauge/Gravity Duality

8.821 String Theory Fall 2008

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 28 Mar 2000

Interacting Membranes

M-theory and Membranes

Transcription:

On Special Geometry of Generalized G Structures and Flux Compactifications Hu Sen, USTC Hangzhou-Zhengzhou, 2007 1

Dreams of A. Einstein: Unifications of interacting forces of nature 1920 s known forces: Gravity and Electro-Magnetic forces(matters) 2

General Relativity: Einstein-Hilbert action S(g) = R gd 4 x M 4 δs = 0 R µν 1 2 Rg µν = 0. 3

Electro-Magnetic forces obey Maxwell equations: S = 1 4 F µνf µν + 1 4 J µa µ F = da = ΣF µν dx µ dx ν, F µν = µ A ν ν A µ df = 0, d( F ) = J. 4

Unification of gravity and electro-magnetic fields: Kaluza-Klein compactifications M 5 = M 4 S 1 ds 2 = Σg mn dx m dx n = e 2Φ/3 Σg µν dx µ dx ν + e 4Φ/3 (dθ + A µ dx µ ) 2 g µν (x, θ) = Σg µν;n e 2πnθ A µ (x, θ) = ΣA µ;n e 2πnθ 5

Only keeping the lightest modes: g µν;0, A µ;0 The Einstein-Hilbert action S(g) = R gd 5 x M 5 reduces to the Einstein-Hilbert-Yang-Mills action S(g, A, Φ) = gd 4 x(r + dφ 2 1 M 4 2 F µνf µν ) Conclusion: We have unified gravity-electro-magnetic forces by using a five dimensional gravity! 6

String/M Theory is to realize A. Einstein s dream in broadest generality We have four fundamental forces: gravity and matters: electro-magnetic, weak and strong Matters obey laws in gauge theories with gauge groups: U(1), SU(2) U(1), SU(3) SU(2) U(1) Standard models were constructed in 1970 s and it fits with experiments very well 7

Gravity is generalized to super-gravity to incorporate super-symmetry SUGRA is a local gauge theory with gauge symmetry the SUSY algebra 8

M Theory: 11 dimensional Super-gravity Fields: a metric G MN, a gravitino ψ M, and a three form A MNP The bosonic action of the 11D Supergravity: 2kS = d 11 x G(R 1 2 F 4 2 ) 1 6 A 3 F 4 F 4. 9

Supersymmetric solutions: δψ M = M ɛ + 1 12 (Γ MF 4 3F 4 M)ɛ = 0, ɛ are Killing spinors. 10

Type IIA String theory from M theory by dimensional reduction M 11 = M 10 S 1 ds 2 = Σg mn dx m dx n = e 2Φ/3 Σg µν dx µ dx ν + e 4Φ/3 (dθ + A µ dx µ ) 2 A 11 µνρ = A µνρ, A 11 µν11 = B µν 11

The bosonic action of Type IIA is: S NS = 1 2k 2 S R = 1 4k 2 S = S NS + S R + S CS d 10 x g(r + 4 µ Φ µ Φ 1 2 H 3 2 ), S CS = 1 k 2 d 10 x g( F 2 2 + F 4 2 ), B 2 A 4 A 4. 12

Super-symmetric solutions δψ µ = ( µ 1 4 H3 µγ 11 1 8 eφ F νρ Γ νρ µ Γ 1 + 1 8 eφ F 4 Γ µ )ɛ = 0, δλ = ( 1 3 Γµ µ ΦΓ 11 + 1 6 H3 1 4 eφ F 2 + 1 12 eφ F 4 Γ 11 )ɛ = 0, dh = 0. 13

Compactifications of 10D theory to a 4D theory M 1,9 = R 1,3 M 6 ɛ 1,2 = Σξ 1,2 η 1,2 No fluxes: Covariant constant spinor and Calabi-Yau manifold η = 0 Yau s theorem: For a Kahler manifold M with c 1 (T M) = 0, there exists a Ricci flat metric. 14

Moduli space of Calabi-Yau manifolds Symplectic structures ω and complex structures Ω M = M K M C H 1,1 (M) H 2,1 (M) 15

Special geometry over M M is a Kahler manifold with the Kahler metric: ds 2 = 1 g a bg c d(δg ac δg b d + (δg V a dδg c b δb a dδb c b)d 6 x. M 6 It is a Kahler metric with Kahler potential: e K2,1 = i Ω Ω, e K1,1 = i ω ω ω. Much of developments in string theory depend on this special geometry! 16

Mirror symmetry: one Calabi-Yau M 1 is mirror to another Calabi-Yau M 2 M K (M 1 ) = M C (M 2 ). Web of dualities of string theories 17

Turning on fluxes: Nervu-Schwarz fluxes and Ramond-Ramond fluxes Super-symmetric solutions δψ µ = ( µ 1 4 H3 µγ 11 1 8 eφ F νρ Γ νρ µ Γ 1 + 1 8 eφ F 4 Γ µ )ɛ = 0, δλ = ( 1 3 Γµ µ ΦΓ 11 + 1 6 H3 1 4 eφ F 2 + 1 12 eφ F 4 Γ 11 )ɛ = 0, dh = 0. 18

Existence of two non-vanishing spinors: an almost generalized SU(3) SU(3) structure Structure group reduction from SO(6, 6) to SU(3, 3) We have two SU(3) invariant spinors ɛ 1,2 ρ = Σ ɛ 2 Γ µ 1...µ p ɛ 1 dx µ1... dx µp ɛ 1 = ɛ 2, ρ = 1 + ω 1,1 + Ω 3,0 + Hodge dual 19

Supersymmetric solutions are integrable generalized SU(3) SU(3) structures d H (ρ) = 0, d H ˆρ = F, d H = d + H. Those are generalized Maxwell-Hodge equations. 20

The moduli space of almost generalized SU(3) SU(3) structures over a vector space: M = SO(6, 6)/SU(3, 3) = U ρ /C Over a manifold we have a bundle: U ρ /C E M 6 The space of generalized SU(3) SU(3) structures is: M = {Φ E(M 6 ) dφ = 0} 21

Turning on all fluxes: the space of N = 1 string vacua is: M = {Φ E(M 6 ) d H Φ = 0, d H ˆρ = F } Finally, the moduli space of N=1 string vacua is: M = M/ Diff 0 (M 6 ) 22

The Period map: Taking d H cohomology classes Gualtieri: the H H lemma is true for a generalized Kahler manifold Goto: If the H H lemma is true, then the period map is injective. M = {Φ E(M 6 ) d H Φ = 0, d H ˆρ = 0} is included in the space of d H cohomologies 23

Special geometries over M Constant symplectic structure over M ω(φ 1, Φ 2 ) = < Φ 1, Φ 2 >, M 6 Mukai Pairing :< Φ 1, Φ 2 >= Σ p Φ 1,p Φ 2,n p. We have: dω = 0, ω = Σdx K dy K. 24

Complex structure over M Stable spinor decomposed into pure spinors:φ = φ + ˆφ X : ρ = φ + ˆφ ˆρ = iφ + i φ, DX.DX = Id. I = DXdefines an intregrable complex structure overm ω(φ, Φ) = ( Z K F K Z K FK ), Z K, F K are two independent complex coordinates. 25

Hitchin functional and the Kahler metric over M H(Φ) = i < φ, φ >. M 6 The Kahler metric over M is: ds 2 = Σ αβ Hdχ α dχ β. The Kahler potential is:k = log H. We finally have: e K(Φ) = H(Φ) = iω(φ, Φ) = i( Z K F K Z K FK ). 26

Topological strings The moduli space is acted by mapping class groups, Diff + (M)/Diff 0 + (M) H 2 (M, Z) The mapping class group acts on the space of cohomologies which is a vector space This gives a flat connection on the moduli space of generalized Calabi-Yau manifold (Gauss-Manin connection) We can construct topological strings over a generalized Calabi-Yau manifold. Q: Can we generalize Ooguri-Strominger-Vafa s conjecture to generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds? 27

Flux compactifications and Supersymmetry breaking By introducing RR fluxes, we break half of supersymmetries d H ρ = 0, d H ˆρ = F. RR fluxes are coupled with D-branes, generalized D-branes are generalized sub-manifolds Q: How about the moduli space and what are the BCFT? Q: Can we build more realistic standard model with all fluxes turning on? 28

Mirror symmetry for generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds It is just exchanging two generalized complex structures In the case of Calabi-Yau, it is exchanging complex and symplectic structures 29

Q: How about compactifications of M theory to a seven dimensional manifolds? The answer would be generalized G 2 manifolds. Special geometries for generalized G 2 structures Still have stable spinors and constant symplectic forms and Hitchin functional Q: Are they giving the same set of 4D N=1 string vacua? A: They should be the same and this is duality! 30