Euler Characteristics of Categories and Homotopy Colimits

Similar documents
Higher Categories, Homotopy Theory, and Applications

Groupoids and Orbifold Cohomology, Part 2

Waldhausen Additivity and Approximation in Quasicategorical K-Theory

LOOP GROUPS AND CATEGORIFIED GEOMETRY. Notes for talk at Streetfest. (joint work with John Baez, Alissa Crans and Urs Schreiber)

Twisted Equivariant Cohomology and Orbifolds

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

CATEGORY THEORY. Cats have been around for 70 years. Eilenberg + Mac Lane =. Cats are about building bridges between different parts of maths.

ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY HANDOUT 5: K 0 OF SCHEMES, THE LOCALIZATION SEQUENCE FOR G 0.

Mike Davis. July 4, 2006

Topological Field Theories in Homotopy Theory I

Algebraic Topology Final

A QUICK NOTE ON ÉTALE STACKS

Equivariantly Twisted Cohomology Theories

RELATIVE GROUP COHOMOLOGY AND THE ORBIT CATEGORY

Stacks in Representation Theory.

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

Math 6510 Homework 10

SOME EXERCISES. This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2

Math Homotopy Theory Hurewicz theorem

Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7)

THE HOMOTOPY CALCULUS OF CATEGORIES AND GRAPHS

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

Operads. Spencer Liang. March 10, 2015

AXIOMS FOR GENERALIZED FARRELL-TATE COHOMOLOGY

Exercises for Algebraic Topology

Groupoid Representation Theory

E ring spectra and Hopf invariant one elements

Auslander-Yoneda algebras and derived equivalences. Changchang Xi ( ~) ccxi/

DETECTING K-THEORY BY CYCLIC HOMOLOGY

Entropy, diversity and magnitude

Homotopy Colimits of Relative Categories (Preliminary Version)

Model categories and homotopy colimits in toric topology

Categories and functors

ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: DEFINITIONS & PROPERTIES (TALK NOTES)

Endomorphism Rings of Abelian Varieties and their Representations

We can choose generators of this k-algebra: s i H 0 (X, L r i. H 0 (X, L mr )

Coarse Moduli Spaces of Stacks over Manifolds

POSTNIKOV EXTENSIONS OF RING SPECTRA

FIRST ASSIGNMENT. (1) Let E X X be an equivalence relation on a set X. Construct the set of equivalence classes as colimit in the category Sets.

arxiv: v1 [math.at] 13 Nov 2007

The Fundamental Gerbe of a Compact Lie Group

JUVITOP OCTOBER 22, 2016: THE HOPKINS-MILLER THEOREM

Realization problems in algebraic topology

On the Homotopy Type of CW-Complexes with Aspherical Fundamental Group

On 2-Representations and 2-Vector Bundles

Induced maps on Grothendieck groups

Model Structures on the Category of Small Double Categories

Math 440 Problem Set 2

30 Surfaces and nondegenerate symmetric bilinear forms

OVERVIEW OF SPECTRA. Contents

The Structure of Fusion Categories via Topological Quantum Field Theories

Iterated Bar Complexes of E-infinity Algebras and Homology Theories

Bernhard Keller. University Paris 7 and Jussieu Mathematics Institute. On differential graded categories. Bernhard Keller

58 CHAPTER 2. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS

Smith theory. Andrew Putman. Abstract

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA LECTURE 1: SOME CATEGORY THEORY

Derived Algebraic Geometry I: Stable -Categories

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 5 Oct 1999

SMSTC Geometry and Topology

Commutative ring objects in pro-categories and generalized Moore spectra

Persistent Local Systems

FINITE SPECTRA CARY MALKIEWICH


INFINITE LOOP SPACES AND NILPOTENT K-THEORY

Postnikov extensions of ring spectra

BUNDLES, STIEFEL WHITNEY CLASSES, & BRAID GROUPS

1. Introduction. Let C be a Waldhausen category (the precise definition

Noncommutative geometry and quantum field theory

Etale homotopy theory (after Artin-Mazur, Friedlander et al.)

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS

A complement to the theory of equivariant finiteness obstructions

Symmetric monoidal structure on Non-commutative motives

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Odds and ends on equivariant cohomology and traces

Applications of 2-categorical algebra to the theory of operads. Mark Weber

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVARIANT POSETS

GROUP ACTIONS ON SPHERES WITH RANK ONE ISOTROPY

Filtered spaces. Ronnie Brown. March 28, 2011 Tbilisi Conference on Homotopy Theory and Non Commutative Geometry. Filtered spaces

Topological K-theory

INDUCTIVE PRESENTATIONS OF GENERALIZED REEDY CATEGORIES. Contents. 1. The algebraic perspective on Reedy categories

1 Categorical Background

Equivalence of the Combinatorial Definition (Lecture 11)

FORMAL GLUEING OF MODULE CATEGORIES

Duality, Residues, Fundamental class

STUFF ABOUT QUASICATEGORIES

1 Motivation. If X is a topological space and x X a point, then the fundamental group is defined as. the set of (pointed) morphisms from the circle

38 CHAPTER 2. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS. f n. n 1. X n 1. g n. X n

Homotopy Automorphisms of Operads & Grothendieck-Teichmüller Groups

Iwasawa algebras and duality

The Kervaire Invariant One Problem, Talk 0 (Introduction) Independent University of Moscow, Fall semester 2016

A Taxonomy of 2d TQFTs

Local higher category theory

Deformation groupoids and index theory

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory

CATEGORIES AND TOPOLOGY 2016 (BLOCK 1) LECTURE NOTES, PART II JESPER GRODAL AND RUNE HAUGSENG

Algebraic models for higher categories

CW-complexes. Stephen A. Mitchell. November 1997

VECTOR FIELDS AND FLOWS ON DIFFERENTIABLE STACKS

Transcription:

Euler Characteristics of Categories and Homotopy Colimits Thomas M. Fiore joint work with Wolfgang Lück and Roman Sauer http://www-personal.umd.umich.edu/~tmfiore/

Outline 1 2 3 4 5 6

I..

The most basic invariant of a finite CW -complex is the Euler characteristic. χ: finite CW -complexes R Remarkable connections to geometry: χ(compact connected orientable surface) = 2 2 genus, Theorem of Gauss-Bonnet χ(m) = 1 2π M curvature da for M any compact 2-dimensional Riemannian manifold.

Problem: meaningfully define χ purely in terms of the combinatorial models finite skeletal categories without loops finite CW -complexes? χ R

More generally: categories finite skeletal categories without loops χ( ) finite CW -complexes R? χ

Trivial Example Presents Challenges Γ = Ẑ2, that is, Γ has one object and mor Γ (, ) = Z 2. Ẑ2 = geometric realization of nerve of Ẑ2 0-cells of Ẑ2 = ob(ẑ2) = { } 1-cells of Ẑ2 = non-identity maps = { } 2-cells of Ẑ2 = paths of 2 non-id maps = { } etc. = etc. χ( Ẑ2 ) = n 0( 1) n card(n-cells of Ẑ2 ) = n 0 ( 1) n Leinster Berger ===== 1 1 ( 1) = 1 2.

Desiderata for Invariants Desiderata for χ, χ (2) : categories R 1. Geometric relevance 2. Compatibility with equivalence of categories coverings of groupoids: if p : E B, then χ (2) (E) = n χ (2) (B) isofibrations: if f : E B, then χ (2) (E) = χ (2) (f 1 (b 0 )) χ (2) (B) finite products finite coproducts pushouts (Inclusion-Exclusion Principle) χ(a B) = χ(a) + χ(b) χ(a B) homotopy colimits. Our work achieves this.

Desiderata for Invariants Desiderata for χ, χ (2) : categories R 1. Geometric relevance 2. Compatibility with equivalence of categories coverings of groupoids: if p : E B, then χ (2) (E) = n χ (2) (B) isofibrations: if f : E B, then χ (2) (E) = χ (2) (f 1 (b 0 )) χ (2) (B) finite products finite coproducts pushouts (Inclusion-Exclusion Principle) χ(a B) = χ(a) + χ(b) χ(a B) homotopy colimits. Our work achieves this.

Pushouts in Cat and χ {0, 1} {0 1} { } pushout N χ( N ) =χ(s 1 ) = 0 = 1 + 1 2 " {0, 1} { } { } pushout { } χ({ }) =1 1 + 1 2 % Colimits are not homotopy invariant, cannot expect compatibility of χ with pushouts.

Homotopy Pushouts in Cat and χ {0, 1} {0 1} { } Homotopy p.o. is {0, 1} { } { } Homotopy p.o. is In both cases, χ = 0 = 1 + 1 2. "

Main Theorem of this Talk Theorem (Fiore-Lück-Sauer) Let C : I Cat be a pseudo functor such that I is directly finite: ab = id ba = id; I admits a finite I-CW -model, Λ n := the finite set of n-cells λ = mor(?, i λ ) D n ; each C(i) is of type (FP R ). Then: χ(hocolim I C; R) = n 0 ( 1) n λ Λ n χ(c(i λ ); R). Similar formulas hold for the L 2 -Euler characteristic, the functorial characteristics, and the finiteness obstruction.

II. Finiteness Obstructions and Euler Characteristics for Categories.

Modules and the Projective Class Group R= an associative commutative ring with 1 Γ= a small category An RΓ-module is a functor M : Γ op R-MOD. K 0 (RΓ) :=projective class group = Z{iso classes of finitely generated projective RΓ-modules} modulo the relation [P 0 ] [P 1 ] + [P 2 ] = 0 for every exact sequence 0 P 0 P 1 P 2 0 of finitely generated projective RΓ-modules.

Type (FP) and Finiteness Obstruction Γ is of type (FP R ) if there is a finite projective RΓ-resolution P R. In this case, the finiteness obstruction is o(γ; R) := n 0( 1) n [P n ] K 0 (RΓ). Remark Suppose G is a finitely presented group of type (FP Z ). Then o(ĝ; Z) = owall (BG; Z).

Examples of Type (FP) Example Suppose Γ is a finite category in which every endo is an iso, that is, Γ is an EI-category. If aut Γ (x) R for all x ob(γ), then Γ is of type (FP R ). Thus finite groupoids, finite posets, finite transport groupoids, and orbit categories of finite groups are all of type (FP Q ).

Splitting Theorem of Lück Theorem If Γ is an EI-category, then K 0 (RΓ) S x iso(γ) K 0 (R aut Γ (x)) is an isomorphism, where S x (M) is the quotient of the R-module M(x) by the R-submodule generated by all images of M(u) for all non-invertible morphisms u : x y in Γ.

Euler Characteristic Definition Suppose that Γ is of type (FP R ) and P R is a finite projective RΓ-resolution. The Euler characteristic of Γ with coefficients in R is χ(γ; R) := ( 1) n ( rk R Sx P n R autγ (x) R ). x iso(γ) n 0 Example G finite groupoid χ(g; Q) = iso(g).

L 2 -Euler Characteristic Definition Suppose that Γ is of type (L 2 ) and P C is a (not necessarily finite) projective CΓ-resolution. The L 2 -Euler characteristic of Γ is χ (2) (Γ) := x iso(γ) n 0 ( 1) n dim N (x) H n (S x P C autγ (x) N (x)) where N (x) = B ( l 2( aut Γ (x) )) aut Γ (x) is the group von Neumann algebra of aut Γ (x).

Example of L 2 -Euler Characteristic Example Let G be a groupoid such that aut G (x) < and 1 aut G (x) <. x iso(g) Then χ (2) (G) = 1 aut G (x) x iso(g) Leinster-Berger in finite case.). (Same as Baez-Dolan, and

Comparison with Topology Theorem If Γ is a directly finite category of type (FF C ), then Example χ(γ; C) = χ (2) (Γ) = χ(bγ; C). If Γ is a finite skeletal category without loops, then it is of type (FF C ), and all three invariants are equal to ( 1) n c n (Γ) n 0 where c n is the number of nondegenerate paths i 0 i 1 i 2 i n of n-many morphisms in Γ.

III..

I-Spaces I = a small category An I-space is a functor X : I op SPACES. Example 1 mor I (, i) 2 mor I (, i) S n 1 3 mor I (, i) D n 4 Pushouts of these

I-CW -complexes An I-CW -complex X is an I-space X together with a filtration = X 1 X 0 X 1 X 2... X n... X = n 0 X n such that X = colim n X n and for any n 0 the n-skeleton X n is obtained from the (n 1)-skeleton X n 1 by attaching I-n-cells, i.e., there exists a pushout of I-spaces of the form λ Λ n mor I (, i λ ) S n 1 X n 1 λ Λ n mor I (, i λ ) D n X n where the vertical maps are inclusions, Λ n is an index set, and the i λ s are objects of I. In particular, X 0 = λ Λ 0 mor I (, i λ ).

Definition A finite model for the I-classifying space is a finite I-CW -complex X such that X (i) is contractible for each object i of I. Example I = {k j l} admits a finite model X 0 := mor I (?, k) mor I (?, l) mor I (, j) S 0 X 0 mor I (, j) D 1 X 1 Then X (k) =, X (l) =, X (j) = D 1.

IV. Homotopy Colimit Formula and the Inclusion-Exclusion Principle.

Homotopy Colimits in Cat Thomason: In Cat, a homotopy colimit of C : I Cat is given by the Grothendieck construction. The category hocolim I C has objects pairs (i, c), where i ob(i) and c ob ( C(i) ). A morphism from (i, c) to (j, d) is a pair (u, f ), where u : i j is a morphism in I and f : C(u)(c) d is a morphism in C(j). Example 1 C : Ĝ Cat has homotopy colimit = homotopy orbit of G-action on C( ). 2 If C( ) is a set, then this gives the transport groupoid of the left G-action.

Homotopy Colimit Formula and Incl.-Excl. Principle Theorem (Fiore-Lück-Sauer) C : I Cat a pseudo functor, I directly finite with a finite I-CW -model, Λ n = the finite set of I-n-cells λ = mor(?, i λ ) D n, each F (i) of type (FP R ), then χ(hocolim I C; R) = n 0 ( 1) n λ Λ n χ(c(i λ ); R). Example I = {k j l} admits a finite model, Λ 0 = {k, l} and Λ 1 = {j} Theorem χ(homotopy pushout of C) = χ(c(k)) + χ(c(l)) χ(c(j)).

V..

Comparison with Leinster s Weightings Γ=a finite category A weighting on Γ is a function k : ob(γ) Q such that for all objects x ob(γ), we have mor(x, y) k y = 1. Theorem (Fiore-Lück-Sauer) y ob(γ) I a finite category, X a finite model, then the function k : ob(i) Q defined by k y := n 0( 1) n (number of n-cells of X based at y) is a weighting on I. More generally, finite free RΓ-resolutions of R produce weightings.

Comparison with Leinster s Euler Characteristics Definition (Leinster) A finite category Γ has an Euler characteristic in the sense of Leinster if it admits both a weighting k and a coweighting k. In this case, its Euler characteristic in the sense of Leinster is defined as χ L (Γ) := k y = k x. y ob(γ) x ob(γ) This agrees with χ (2) when Γ is finite, EI, skeletal, and the left aut Γ (y)-action on mor Γ (x, y) is free for every two objects x, y ob(γ). Proof: K-theoretic Möbius inversion.

VI..

Applications 1 Let G be a group which admits a finite G-CW -model Y for the classifying space for proper G-actions. The equivariant Euler characteristic of Y is the functorial (L 2 ) Euler characteristic of the proper orbit category. 2 Developability of Haefliger complexes of groups: χ (2) (hocolim X /G F ) = χ(2) (X ) G = χ(x ; C) G = χ(bx ; C). G

Summary We have introduced notions of finiteness obstruction, Euler characteristic, and L 2 -Euler characteristic for wide classes of categories, including certain infinite ones. Origins lie in the homological algebra of modules over categories and modules over group von Neumann algebras. These notions are compatible with: equivalences of categories, coverings, fibrations, finite products, finite coproducts, homotopy colimits. In the case of groups, the L 2 -Euler characteristic agrees with the classical L 2 -Euler characteristic of groups. The notions are geometric: agree with χ(bγ) or equivariant Euler characteristic in certain cases. The notions are combinatorial: have K-theoretic Möbius inversion.