Prompt γ-rays from Neutron Inelastic

Similar documents
Partial Neutron Capture Cross Section Determination of 237 Np, 242

Application of prompt gamma activation analysis with neutron beams for the detection and analysis of nuclear materials in containers

Cross-section Measurements of Relativistic Deuteron Reactions on Copper by Activation Method

Integral cross section measurements using TRIGA reactor and Am/Be neutron source

High precision neutron inelastic cross section measurements

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PIGE, PIXE AND NAA ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF MINOR ELEMENTS IN STEELS

High-energy calibration data for neutron activation analysis

Ion-beam techniques. Ion beam. Electrostatic Accelerators. Van de Graaff accelerator Pelletron Tandem Van de Graaff

Measurement of neutron energy spectrum at the radial channel No. 4 of the Dalat reactor

THE STRUCTURE OF ATOMS. ATOMS Atoms consist of a number of fundamental particles, the most important ones are...

The first model was based only on the CANBERRA information which we. drawing. Canberra refused any other information.

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract

Preparatory experiments for cold-neutron induced fission studies at IKI

Cross-section section measurements of neutron threshold reactions in various materials

Element Cube Project (x2)

Photofission of 238-U Nuclei

KIVI 9 Oct 2015 Fysische Beeldtechnieken 18 feb

1 of 5 14/10/ :21

Determination of the activity of radionuclides

Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions

Experimental Activities in China

7) Applications of Nuclear Radiation in Science and Technique (1) Analytical applications (Radiometric titration)

Atomic Physics. Chapter 6 X ray. Jinniu Hu 24/12/ /20/13

Deuteron activation cross section measurements at the NPI cyclotron

REFERENCE SOURCES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF THE AUTOCORRELATION SINGLE-CRYSTAL SCINTILLATION TIME SPECTROMETER

Unit 1 Part 2 Atomic Structure and The Periodic Table Introduction to the Periodic Table UNIT 1 ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND THE PERIODIC TABLE

The Periodic Table. Periodic Properties. Can you explain this graph? Valence Electrons. Valence Electrons. Paramagnetism

Topic 3: Periodicity OBJECTIVES FOR TODAY: Fall in love with the Periodic Table, Interpret trends in atomic radii, ionic radii, ionization energies &

Experimental Determination of Cross Sections for (n,x) Nuclear Reactions

Experimental determination of (n,x( n,x) cross sections on germanium (Ge( Ge), terbium (Tb) and lutetium (Lu)

Background by Neutron Activation in GERDA

ORBITAL DIAGRAM - A graphical representation of the quantum number "map" of electrons around an atom.

Performance of the True Coincidence Correction Method in GammaVision. Keyser, Ronald M., Haywood, Susan E., and Upp, Daniel L.

Bertram Blank CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan. Germanium detector calibration experimental studies: decay mirror decay future work

The Possibility to Use Energy plus Transmutation Setup for Neutron Production and Transport Benchmark Studies

The European Activation File: EAF-2005 decay data library

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF NEUTRON FIELDS PRODUCED IN PROTON REACTIONS WITH HEAVY TARGETS. Nuclear Physics Institute AS CR, Rez Czech Republic

Investigation of radiative proton-capture reactions using high-resolution g-ray spectroscopy

Neutron Activation of 74 Ge and 76 Ge

Spin Cut-off Parameter of Nuclear Level Density and Effective Moment of Inertia

Experimental Activities in China

Using the Periodic Table

Fast neutron inelastic scattering Roland Beyer, Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf

Stability Nuclear & Electronic (then ion formation/covalent bonding)

ORBITAL DIAGRAM - A graphical representation of the quantum number "map" of electrons around an atom.

Nucleus. Electron Cloud

DIPOLE-STRENGTH IN N=50 NUCLEI STUDIED IN PHOTON-SCATTERING EXPERIMENTS AT ELBE

CATHODE MATERIAL CHANGE AFTER DEUTERIUM GLOW DISCHARGE EXPERIMENTS

How many grams of sodium metal is required to completely react with 2545 grams of chlorine gas?

Electromagnetic Dipole Strength distribution in 124,128,134 Xe below the neutron separation energy

Radiometric Dating (tap anywhere)

M.Cagnazzo Atominstitut, Vienna University of Technology Stadionallee 2, 1020 Wien, Austria

Neutronics experiments for validation of activation and neutron transport data for fusion application at the DT neutron generator of TU Dresden

CLASS TEST GRADE 11. PHYSICAL SCIENCES: CHEMISTRY Test 4: Matter and materials 1

The possibility to use energy plus transmutation set-up for neutron production and transport benchmark studies

How many grams of sodium metal is required to completely react with 2545 grams of chlorine gas?

Neutron transmission and capture measurements for 241 Am at GELINA

Atoms and the Periodic Table

The Periodic Table of the Elements

VERIFICATION OF MONTE CARLO CALCULATIONS OF THE NEUTRON FLUX IN THE CAROUSEL CHANNELS OF THE TRIGA MARK II REACTOR, LJUBLJANA

Collimated LaBr 3 detector response function in radioactivity analysis of nuclear waste drums

PART 1 Introduction to Theory of Solids

CHEM 10113, Quiz 5 October 26, 2011

5 questions, 3 points each, 15 points total possible. 26 Fe Cu Ni Co Pd Ag Ru 101.

This paper should be understood as an extended version of a talk given at the

-"l" also contributes ENERGY. Higher values for "l" mean the electron has higher energy.

? Physics with many Positrons

- Atomic line spectra are UNIQUE to each element. They're like atomic "fingerprints".

A. Aleksanyan, S. Amirkhanyan, H. Gulkanyan*, T. Kotanjyan, L. Poghosyan, V. Pogosov

The Shape of the Full-Energy Gamma Ray Peak in Germanium Detectors for Different Energies and Incident Geometries

Neutron Activation of 76Ge

CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS MOLECULAR COMPOUNDS

PARAMETERISATION OF FISSION NEUTRON SPECTRA (TRIGA REACTOR) FOR NEUTRON ACTIVATION WITHOUT THE USED OF STANDARD

Experimental Studies on the Self-Shielding Effect in Fissile Fuel Breeding Measurement in Thorium Oxide Pellets Irradiated with 14 MeV Neutrons

Course theme. Three hours of lab Complete E1 (Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5B) Prepare discussion presentation Prepare team report.

Three hours of lab Complete E1 (Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5B) Prepare discussion presentation Prepare team report. Course theme

Turkey s first photonuclear reactions performed at Akdeniz University: Matter, Anti-matter, Pure Energy and Alchemy

Essential Chemistry for Biology

IAEA-SM-367/10/04/P SCREENING AND RADIOMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SWIPE SAMPLES

The Generalized Centroid Difference Method

Bertram Blank CEN Bordeaux-Gradignan. Germanium detector calibration experimental studies: b decay mirror b decay future work

Investigation of dipole strength at the ELBE accelerator in Dresden-Rossendorf

Putting it together... - In the early 20th century, there was a debate on the structure of the atom. Thin gold foil

Gamma-neutron competition above the neutron separation energy in betadelayed

Last 4 Digits of USC ID:

Name: SCH3U Worksheet-Trends

NAME (please print) MIDTERM EXAM FIRST LAST JULY 13, 2011

Neutron-induced reaction cross sections measured at. Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory. John Kelley

Reporting Category 1: Matter and Energy

CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS MOLECULAR COMPOUNDS

Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) XPS which makes use of the photoelectric effect, was developed in the mid-1960

Mass Yield Distribution in the Photon-induced Fission of 232 Th, 238 U, nat Pb, and 209 Bi

Laser Spectroscopy on Bunched Radioactive Ion Beams

CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS MOLECULAR COMPOUNDS

Atomic weight: This is a decimal number, but for radioactive elements it is replaced with a number in parenthesis.

-"l" also contributes ENERGY. Higher values for "l" mean the electron has higher energy.

HANDOUT SET GENERAL CHEMISTRY II

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Experiment to validate EAF activation data: Activation on CuCrZr in NPI d-be neutron field

Guide to the Extended Step-Pyramid Periodic Table

Transcription:

Prompt γ-rays from Neutron Inelastic Scattering at FaNGaS: Benchmark Spectrum Analysis T.H. Randriamalala, M. Rossbach Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Nuclear Waste Management and Reactor Safety, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Germany August 23-28, 2015 MTAA 14 Delft, The Netherlands

Outline Introduction & Motivation Experimental Setup Sample Properties Benchmark Studies Conclusion & Outlook T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 2

Introduction & Motivation Prompt γ-rays Neutron Activation Analysis (m n, E ther. ) (m n, E > E T ) (m n, E ) Requirement for the use of fast neutrons interrogation: Knowledge of the absolute intensities or/and the partial cross section of (prompt) γ-rays Knowledge of the total (n, n γ) cross section T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 3

Introduction & Motivation FaNGaS The Fast Neutron Gamma Spectrometry aims to investigate (n, n γ) reaction using the ssion neutrons at FRM II, Garching. Scope of presentation: Confrontation of the measured intensity and count rate of γ-rays with the existing data or with the calculation results from theoretical model. T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 4

The Facility 6 7 5 4 3 2 1 8 D 2 7 = 548 cm D 7 6 = 67 cm 1 Reactor core 4 Inner collimator 7 Irradiation position 2 Convertor plates (93% 235 U) 5 Outer collimator 8 Decay measurement 3 SR10 beam line 6 Shielded 50% HPGe position detector T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 5

FaNGaS Instrument 2 4 1 3 1 Outer 2 Sample holder 3 γ 4 Detector shielding 5 collimator collimator (PE 5 n B4 C Pb ) Iron frame support W H L 126 cm 126 cm 266 cm Weight 4 tonnes Movable instrument T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 6

Beam Characteristic Neutron Beam Spectrum (Very pure) foil activation technique: Sample irrad. time 10 h Decay meas. time 1-2 h 12 threshold and 5 (n, γ) reactions Spectrum unfolding using STAYSL PNNL 1 code: Parametrized prior ux 2 : φ(e) = α t E exp( E/kT ) + α i E (1+c) exp( d/ E) + α f exp( E/a) sinh( be) 1 F.G. Perey, ORNL-TM-6062(1997). 2 H. Breitkreuz et al. NIM A 593 (2008) 466. T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 7

Beam Characteristic Neutron Beam Spectrum 10 8 E φ [MeV cm 2 s 1 ] 10 7 10 6 10 5 10 4 E 2.1 MeV φde 10 8 cm 2 s 1 α f /α t > 2 10 4 10 3 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 10 0 10 1 E [kev] Fast neutron beam energy spectrum at FaNGaS T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 8

FaNGaS Spectrometer n-type HPGe:GMX50-83, ORTEC Data acquisition: DSPEC-50, ORTEC + GammaVision-32 Spectrum evaluation: HYPERMET-PC Efficiency -4 10-5 10 133 Ba 35 60 Cl(n,γ) Co Cs Eu 137 152 2 10 36 Cl 3 10 Energy [kev] 4 10 Detector eciency for prompt γ-rays (67 cm away from the detector) T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 9

Background 106 2 H-D.E. N 14 74 Ge 72 Ar, Ge In 2 116 Ge C 13 41 70 Al Pb 27 Pb 65 Cu 70 Ge 207 207 207 Cu 63 Counts Pb 72 Ge 56,56Mn Ge 104 74 206 72 Ge Pb 74 Ge Counts Pb Annih. B 104 11 10 76 207 Ge 71m 75 m Ge Ge { H-S.E. X 5 103 103 100 200 300 400 500 Energy [kev] 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 Energy [kev] 1500 1600 1700 -S.E. 55 -D.P. -S.E. -D.P.-S.E. 55 Counts D.E. 13 C -D.E. 14 N 12 C C C-S.E. 13 12 103 208 14 Counts N Pb 104 -D.P.-D.E. 103 105 -S.E. -S.E. 2 H 0 102 10 102 1 2000 2500 3000 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 Energy [kev] Total count rate beam on: 4000 cps Strong lines: H(110 cps), B(36 cps), (5 cps) Fast neutron rate at the detector 10 s 1 (from Ge(n, n0 γ) Ge) 74 T.H. Randriamalala 3500 Energy [kev] 8000 8500 9000 74 August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 10

Sample Properties Foil Θ [mm] m [g] purity [%] Be 0.2 99.40 Al 0.25 0.435 99.99 Ti 0.10 0.366 99.99 0.25 1.384 99.99 Co 0.25 1.580 99.95 Ni 0 3.026 99.99 Cu 1.00 5.429 99.99 Zr 0.25 1.077 99.94 Nb 0.25 1.412 99.99 Rh 0.10 0.802 99.80 Pd 0.025 0.194 99.95 Cd 0.10 2.663 99.99 In 0.2 99.40 W 0.10 0.715 99.99 Pt 0.025 0.339 99.95 Pb 0.25 4.237 99.98 U 0.25 0.4036 99.98 T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 11

Sample Properties Foil Θ [mm] m [g] purity [%] Be 0.2 99.40 Al 0.25 0.435 99.99 Ti 0.10 0.366 99.99 0.25 1.384 99.99 Co 0.25 1.580 99.95 Ni 0 3.026 99.99 Cu 1.00 5.429 99.99 Zr 0.25 1.077 99.94 Nb 0.25 1.412 99.99 Rh 0.10 0.802 99.80 Pd 0.025 0.194 99.95 Cd 0.10 2.663 99.99 In 0.2 99.40 W 0.10 0.715 99.99 Pt 0.025 0.339 99.95 Pb 0.25 4.237 99.98 U 0.25 0.4036 99.98 T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 11

Benchmark Spectrum Found γ-rays are matched with γ-rays transition based on ENSDF a 83 γ-rays found: 54 (7), 56 (72), (4) Counts 6 10 5 10 4 10 122 230 366 537 650 847 7 852 956 1038 1090 1153 1238 1303 1408 1551 1671 1771 1811 1852 2035 2095 2214 2274 2426 2523 2599 2658 2759 2983 3121 3201 3167 3254 3371 3449 3549 3601 3664 3764 3813 56 54 4033 a http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/. 3 10 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Energy [kev] Prompt γ-rays from iron sample irradiation T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 12

Benchmark Analysis Found γ-rays Isotope Demidov 3 FaNGaS Missed by FaNGaS 54 4 7 0 56 37 72 3 59 Co 53 79 3 58 Ni 33 93 4 63 Cu 46 120 6 3 A.M Demidov et al., ATLAS of Gamma-Ray Spectra from Inelastic Scattering of Reactor Fast Neutrons Moscow (1978). T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 13

Benchmark Analysis I/I Dem. 1.0 56 0.0 1.0 1.0 59 Co 0.0 1.0 1.0 58 Ni 0.0 1.0 1.0 63 Cu 0.0 1.0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 E [kev] Relative γ-ray intensities compared to those of Demidov T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 13

Rate Comparison Measured count rate: R meas = R N = C Nεκt meas C : the counts in the peak ε: the eciency t meas : the measurement time κ: a correction factor (sample self-shielding) Calculated count rate: R calc = R N = σ p (E)φ(E)dE σ p : the γ-ray production cross section calculated from TALYS 3 φ: the determined ux 3 http://www.talys.eu/. T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 14

Rate Comparison 10-16 56 meas. 56 calc. 54 meas. 10-17 54 calc. R [ atom 1.s 1 ] 10-18 10-19 10-20 1.0 R/R c 0.0 1.0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 E [kev] T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 15

Rate Comparison 10-16 59 Co meas. 59 Co calc. 10-17 R [ atom 1.s 1 ] 10-18 10-19 10-20 1.0 R/R c 0.0 1.0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 E [kev] T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 15

Rate Comparison 10-16 58 Ni meas. 58 Ni calc. 10-17 R [ atom 1.s 1 ] 10-18 10-19 10-20 1.0 R/R c 0.0 1.0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 E [kev] T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 15

Rate Comparison 10-16 63 Cu meas. 63 Cu calc. 10-17 R [ atom 1.s 1 ] 10-18 10-19 10-20 1.0 R/R c 0.0 1.0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 E [kev] T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 15

Conclusion Neutron inelastic (prompt) γ-rays were measured using 10 8 n cm 2 s 1 with Ē = 2.1 MeV at FaNGaS. FaNGaS can resolve a larger part of the γ-rays (cp. Demidov 1978) Measured intensity and count rate of γ-rays agreed with existing data. Outlook γ & n background reduction Total and partial cross sections determination Build an (n, n γ) catalog of elements T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 16

FaNGaS Collaboration: FZ-Jülich GmbH: M. Rossbach, T. Randriamalala, E.Mauerhofer MLZ, Garching: Zs. Révay, P. Kudejova, S. Söllradl, F. Wagner, C. Genreith FaNGaS is supported by BMBF. Project Nr: 02S9052A T.H. Randriamalala August 28, 2015 MTAA 14 17

Thanks for your attention!

Foils Mass [g] Reaction E thr [MeV ] R [/atom s] Al 0.437 27Al(n, p) 27 Mg 1.896 (5.40 ± 0.14) 10 19 27Al(n, α) 24 Na 3.249 (1.22 ± 0.04) 10 19 Ti 0.376 46Ti(n, p) 46 Sc 1.619 (1.87 ± 0.35) 10 18 47Ti(n, p) 47 Sc 0.075 (2.19 ± 0.05) 10 18 48Ti(n, p) 48 Sc 3.276 (5.45 ± 0.21) 10 20 1.384 56(n, p) 56 Mn 2.965 (1.99 ± 0.07) 10 19 Co 1.580 59Co(n, α) 56 Mn 1.500 (4.00 ± 0.15) 10 20 Ni 3.026 58Ni(n, p) 58 Co 0.490 (9.67 ± 0.21) 10 18 61Ni(n, p) 61 Co 49 (2.45 ± 0.14) 10 19 Cu 5.429 65Cu(n, p) 65 Ni 1.376 (6.14 ± 0.37) 10 20 Rh 0.802 103Rh(n, n ) 103m Rh 0.040 (4.05 ± 0.36) 10 17 In 2.412 115In(n, n ) 115m In 0.339 (2.42 ± 0.04) 10 17 1.384 58(n, γ) 59 (3.22 ± 0.29) 10 17 Co 1.580 59Co(n, γ) 60m Co (9.78 ± 0.22) 10 18 In 2.412 115In(n, γ) 116m In (5.03 ± 0.08) 10 17 W 0.715 186W(n, γ) 187 W (3.86 ± 0.10) 10 17 Au 63 197Au(n, γ) 198 Au (9.59 ± 0.09) 10 17