Metastability and discontinuous condensation in zero-range processes

Similar documents
Zero-range condensation and granular clustering

Discontinuous condensation transition and nonequivalence of ensembles in a zero-range process

Statistical Mechanics of Extreme Events

A STUDY ON CONDENSATION IN ZERO RANGE PROCESSES

Open boundary conditions in stochastic transport processes with pair-factorized steady states

Available online at ScienceDirect. Physics Procedia 57 (2014 ) 77 81

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 6 Dec 2004

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 30 Aug 2015

Hydrodynamics. Stefan Flörchinger (Heidelberg) Heidelberg, 3 May 2010

STATIONARY NON EQULIBRIUM STATES F STATES FROM A MICROSCOPIC AND A MACROSCOPIC POINT OF VIEW

Coarsening process in the 2d voter model

S(l) bl + c log l + d, with c 1.8k B. (2.71)

Preliminary Exam: Probability 9:00am 2:00pm, Friday, January 6, 2012

Landscape Approach to Glass Transition and Relaxation. Lecture # 4, April 1 (last of four lectures)

Zeroth law of thermodynamics for nonequilibrium steady states in contact

Phase transitions for particles in R 3

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 8 Jan 2004

Principles of Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics

Sub -T g Relaxation in Thin Glass

SPECTRAL GAP FOR ZERO-RANGE DYNAMICS. By C. Landim, S. Sethuraman and S. Varadhan 1 IMPA and CNRS, Courant Institute and Courant Institute

Where Probability Meets Combinatorics and Statistical Mechanics

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 24 Oct 2007

Stochastic process. X, a series of random variables indexed by t

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 20 Sep 2010

763620SS STATISTICAL PHYSICS Solutions 8 Autumn 2015

Density and current profiles for U q (A (1) 2) zero range process

Lectures on Stochastic Stability. Sergey FOSS. Heriot-Watt University. Lecture 4. Coupling and Harris Processes

2.4 DNA structure. S(l) bl + c log l + d, with c 1.8k B. (2.72)

1 Continuous-time chains, finite state space

(1) Consider a lattice of noninteracting spin dimers, where the dimer Hamiltonian is

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 10 Feb 2014

Equilibrium fluctuations of additive functionals of zero-range models

fiziks Institute for NET/JRF, GATE, IIT-JAM, JEST, TIFR and GRE in PHYSICAL SCIENCES

A Functional Central Limit Theorem for an ARMA(p, q) Process with Markov Switching

Other properties of M M 1

J. Stat. Mech. (2016)

Class 11 Non-Parametric Models of a Service System; GI/GI/1, GI/GI/n: Exact & Approximate Analysis.

Suggestions for Further Reading

Queueing Networks and Insensitivity

Lecture 20: Reversible Processes and Queues

The parallel replica method for Markov chains

Scaling limits of inclusion particles. Cristian Giardinà

Introduction to Markov Chains, Queuing Theory, and Network Performance

Markov Chains. X(t) is a Markov Process if, for arbitrary times t 1 < t 2 <... < t k < t k+1. If X(t) is discrete-valued. If X(t) is continuous-valued

Dynamics of Instantaneous Condensation in the ZRP Conditioned on an Atypical Current

Gases and the Virial Expansion

The range of tree-indexed random walk

Data analysis and stochastic modeling

Estimation of arrival and service rates for M/M/c queue system

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 24 Aug 2016

Phase transitions and finite-size scaling

Interacting stochastic processes

High-Temperature Criticality in Strongly Constrained Quantum Systems

Non equilibrium thermodynamic transformations. Giovanni Jona-Lasinio

Turbulent spectra generated by singularities

Stochastic domination in space-time for the supercritical contact process

Non-equilibrium phenomena and fluctuation relations

1. Thermodynamics 1.1. A macroscopic view of matter

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 12 Jun 2007

Collective Effects. Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Physics

The parabolic Anderson model on Z d with time-dependent potential: Frank s works

Irreducibility. Irreducible. every state can be reached from every other state For any i,j, exist an m 0, such that. Absorbing state: p jj =1

Power Series. Part 1. J. Gonzalez-Zugasti, University of Massachusetts - Lowell

CHAPTER 4. Cluster expansions

MARTIN RICHARD EVANS

arxiv: v1 [math.pr] 31 Aug 2018

Realizability of point processes

Phase transitions and critical phenomena

NEW FRONTIERS IN APPLIED PROBABILITY

Théorie des grandes déviations: Des mathématiques à la physique

ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF A TAGGED PARTICLE IN SIMPLE EXCLUSION PROCESSES

e - c o m p a n i o n

Statistical Mechanics

Non-homogeneous random walks on a semi-infinite strip

Mathematical Structures of Statistical Mechanics: from equilibrium to nonequilibrium and beyond Hao Ge

Superfluidity in bosonic systems

Practical conditions on Markov chains for weak convergence of tail empirical processes

Non-equilibrium dynamics of Kinetically Constrained Models. Paul Chleboun 20/07/2015 SMFP - Heraclion

Density large-deviations of nonconserving driven models

Physics 112 The Classical Ideal Gas

The Second Virial Coefficient & van der Waals Equation

Deterministic chaos and diffusion in maps and billiards

Thermodynamics and Phase Coexistence in Nonequilibrium Steady States

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 6 Jan 1997

Exam TFY4230 Statistical Physics kl Wednesday 01. June 2016

P (A G) dp G P (A G)

TASEP on a ring in sub-relaxation time scale

A class of non-convex polytopes that admit no orthonormal basis of exponentials

Metastability for continuum interacting particle systems

Markovian Description of Irreversible Processes and the Time Randomization (*).

Interacting particle systems

Hopping transport in disordered solids

Solution. For one question the mean grade is ḡ 1 = 10p = 8 and the standard deviation is 1 = g

Implications of Poincaré symmetry for thermal field theories

Disordered Hyperuniformity: Liquid-like Behaviour in Structural Solids, A New Phase of Matter?

Statistical Mechanics

TOWARDS BETTER MULTI-CLASS PARAMETRIC-DECOMPOSITION APPROXIMATIONS FOR OPEN QUEUEING NETWORKS

Polymer Simulations with Pruned-Enriched Rosenbluth Method I

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 4 Jun 2015

Some open problems related to stability. 1 Multi-server queue with First-Come-First-Served discipline

Transcription:

Metastability and discontinuous condensation in zero-range processes Stefan Großkinsky Warwick in collaboration with G.M. Schütz February 17, 2009

The zero-range process Lattice: Λ L = {1,..., L} with pbc State space: X L = {0, 1,..} Λ L η = (η x ) x ΛL Jump rates: g : {0, 1,..} [0, ) g(k) = 0 k = 0 1 p g 3 p [Spitzer (1970), Andjel (1982)] Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

The zero-range process Lattice: Λ L = {1,..., L} with pbc State space: X L = {0, 1,..} Λ L η = (η x ) x ΛL Jump rates: g : {0, 1,..} [0, ) g(k) = 0 k = 0 1 p g 3 p Conservation law: x Λ L η x (t) N, ρ = N/L [Spitzer (1970), Andjel (1982)] Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

Condensation g(k) = k independent particles (Poisson) g(k) = g server queues (geometric) Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

Condensation g(k) = k independent particles (Poisson) g(k) = g server queues (geometric) g x (k) = g x condensation on the slowest site [Evans (1996), Krug, Ferrari (1996), Benjamini, Ferrari, Landim (1996)] g(k) condensation on a random site [Evans (2000)] g(k) 1 + b k σ, σ (0, 1) ; σ = 1, b > 2 Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

Condensation g(k) = k independent particles (Poisson) g(k) = g server queues (geometric) g x (k) = g x condensation on the slowest site [Evans (1996), Krug, Ferrari (1996), Benjamini, Ferrari, Landim (1996)] g(k) condensation on a random site [Evans (2000)] g(k) 1 + b k σ, σ (0, 1) ; σ = 1, b > 2 ρ c < (ρ ρ c)l fluid phase ρ ρ c condensed phase ρ > ρ c Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

Condensation g(k) condensation on a random site [Evans (2000)] g(k) 1 + b k σ, σ (0, 1); σ = 1, b > 2 Continuous phase transition (e.g. σ = 1) 4 3 Ρ 2 fluid phase Ρ bulk Ρ Ρ c b condensed phase Ρ bulk Ρ c 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

Condensation g(k) condensation on a random site [Evans (2000)] g(k) 1 + b k σ, σ (0, 1); σ = 1, b > 2 Continuous phase transition (e.g. σ = 1) 4 Ρ c b fix b > 2 3 Ρ 2 1 fluid phase Ρ bulk Ρ condensed phase Ρ bulk Ρ c bulk density Ρ c fluid condensed 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 0 Ρ c Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

Applications Condensation phenomena [Evans, Hanney (2005), Evans (2000)] bus route model, ant trails epitaxial growth (step flow model) network dynamics: rewiring (directed) networks glassy dynamics due to entropic barriers (backgammon model) network of server queues (M/M/1) Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

Applications Condensation phenomena [Evans, Hanney (2005), Evans (2000)] bus route model, ant trails epitaxial growth (step flow model) network dynamics: rewiring (directed) networks glassy dynamics due to entropic barriers (backgammon model) network of server queues (M/M/1) Phase separation in one-dimensional exclusion models [Kafri, Levine, Mukamel, Schütz, Török (2002)] ideal Bose gas Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

Applications Clustering in granular gases [van der Meer, van der Weele, Lohse, Mikkelsen, Versluis (2001-02)] stilton.tnw.utwente.nl/people/rene/clustering.html Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

Applications Clustering in granular gases [van der Meer, van der Weele, Lohse, Mikkelsen, Versluis (2001-02)] stilton.tnw.utwente.nl/people/rene/clustering.html Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

Applications Clustering in granular gases [van der Meer, van der Weele, Lohse, Mikkelsen, Versluis (2001-02)] stilton.tnw.utwente.nl/people/rene/clustering.html Model: ZRP with g(k) = k N e 1/(T 0+ (1 k/n)) [Lipowski, Droz (2002), Coppex, Droz, Lipowski (2002)] [Török (2005), van der Meer, Reimann, Lohse (2007)] Introduction Results Conclusion ZRP Condensation Applications

ZRP with size-dependent jump rates { c0, k < R g R (k) =, k R c 1 where c 0 > c 1, L, N, R such that R/L a and N/L ρ c 0 g R k c 1 0 R [G., Schütz (2008)]

ZRP with size-dependent jump rates { c0, k < R g R (k) =, k R c 1 where c 0 > c 1, L, N, R such that R/L a and N/L ρ C F Ρ trans a F C Ρ c a Ρ F Ρ c F E [G., Schütz (2008)] 0 a

ZRP with size-dependent jump rates { c0, k < R g R (k) =, k R c 1 where c 0 > c 1, L, N, R such that R/L a and N/L ρ bulk density Ρ c F E F F C C F 0 Ρ c Ρ c a Ρ Ρ trans [G., Schütz (2008)]

Stationary measures Stationary weights factorize wr(η) L := w R (η x ) with w R (k) γ k g R (i) 1 x Λ L i k with γ > 0 arbitrary (choice of timescale)

Stationary measures Stationary weights factorize wr(η) L := w R (η x ) with w R (k) γ k g R (i) 1 x Λ L i k with γ > 0 arbitrary (choice of timescale) here we choose γ = c 0 and get { 1, k R w R (k) = (c 0 /c 1 ) k R, k > R

Stationary measures { 1, k R stationary weights w R (k) = (c 0 /c 1 ) k R, k > R canonical measures π L,N (η) = 1 Z L,N ( w R (η x ) δ Σx η x, N ) x Λ L

Stationary measures { 1, k R stationary weights w R (k) = (c 0 /c 1 ) k R, k > R canonical measures π L,N (η) = 1 Z L,N ( w R (η x ) δ Σx η x, N ) x Λ L grand-canonical measures fugacity φ 0 ν L φ,r (η) = 1 z R (φ) L x Λ L w R (η x ) φ ηx

Stationary measures { 1, k R stationary weights w R (k) = (c 0 /c 1 ) k R, k > R canonical measures π L,N (η) = 1 Z L,N ( w R (η x ) δ Σx η x, N ) x Λ L grand-canonical measures fugacity φ 0 ν L φ,r (η) = 1 z R (φ) L x Λ L w R (η x ) φ ηx z R (φ) = k=0 w R(k) φ k < for φ < c 1 /c 0

Stationary measures z R (φ) = 1 1 φ + φr( φ 1 + φ + φ ), φ < c 1 /c 0 c 1 /c 0 φ log z R Φ log z R L 2,4,8 0 c 1 c 0

Stationary measures z R (φ) = 1 1 φ + φr( φ 1 + φ + φ ), φ < c 1 /c 0 c 1 /c 0 φ log z R Φ log z R L 2,4,8 0 c 1 c 0 density ρ R (φ) := η x νφ,r = φ φ log z R (φ) ρ R (φ) as φ c 1 /c 0 φ R (ρ)

Equivalence of ensembles Specific relative entropy h ( π L,N, νφ,r L ) 1 := L π L,N (η) log π L,N(η) ν L η X L,N φ (η)

Equivalence of ensembles Specific relative entropy h ( π L,N, νφ,r L ) 1 := L π L,N (η) log π L,N(η) ν L η X L,N φ (η) = log z R (φ) N L log φ 1 L log Z L,N

Equivalence of ensembles Specific relative entropy h ( π L,N, νφ,r L ) 1 := L π L,N (η) log π L,N(η) ν L η X L,N φ (η) = log z R (φ) N L log φ 1 L log Z L,N s gcan (ρ) s can (ρ) as L, N, N/L ρ, provided φ = φ R (ρ)

Equivalence of ensembles Specific relative entropy h ( π L,N, νφ,r L ) 1 := L π L,N (η) log π L,N(η) ν L η X L,N φ (η) = log z R (φ) N L log φ 1 L log Z L,N s gcan (ρ) s can (ρ) as L, N, N/L ρ, provided φ = φ R (ρ) entropy s gcan (ρ) := sup φ<c 1 /c 0 ( ρ log φ p(φ) ) pressure p(φ) := lim L log z R(φ) = log(1 φ), φ < c 1 /c 0

Pressure and entropy { log(1 φ), φ < c1 /c pressure p(φ) = 0, φ c 1 /c 0 p Φ log z R Φ log z R L 2,4,8 log 1 Φ p Φ 0 c 1 c 0

Pressure and entropy { log(1 φ), φ < c1 /c pressure p(φ) = 0, φ c 1 /c 0 p Φ s gcan log z R Φ log z R L 2,4,8 log 1 Φ entropy s Ρ s Ρ c s fluid p Φ 0 c 1 c 0 0 Ρ c where s fluid (ρ) = (1+ρ) log(1+ρ) ρ log ρ, ρ c = 1 c 0 /c 1 1

Canonical entropy h ( π L,N, νφ L ) R (ρ),r s gcan (ρ) s can (ρ) }{{} 1 lim L L log Z L,N

Canonical entropy h ( π L,N, νφ L ) R (ρ),r s gcan (ρ) s can (ρ) }{{} 1 lim L L log Z L,N Main Result where s can (ρ) = { sfluid (ρ), ρ ρ trans (a) s cond (ρ, ρ c ), ρ > ρ trans (a) 1 s cond (ρ, ρ c ) = s fluid (ρ c ) + lim L L log w ( R (ρ ρc )L )

Canonical entropy h ( π L,N, νφ L ) R (ρ),r s gcan (ρ) s can (ρ) }{{} 1 lim L L log Z L,N Main Result where s can (ρ) = { sfluid (ρ), ρ ρ trans (a) s cond (ρ, ρ c ), ρ > ρ trans (a) 1 s cond (ρ, ρ c ) = s fluid (ρ c ) + lim L L log w ( R (ρ ρc )L ) = s fluid (ρ c ) + (ρ ρ c a) log c 0 /c 1.

Canonical entropy Recursion relation Z L,N = Z 1,N = N w R (k) Z L 1,N k... k=0 N w R (k) k=0

Canonical entropy 3.0 c 0 1,c 1 0.5,a 1 s gcan Ρ 2.5 s fluid Ρ 2.0 s can Ρ 1.5 s cond Ρ,Ρ c 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 Ρ c Ρ c a 3 Ρ trans 4

Phase diagram 3.0 c 0 1,c 1 0.5,a 1 s gcan Ρ 2.5 s fluid Ρ 2.0 s can Ρ 1.5 s cond Ρ,Ρ c 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 Ρ c Ρ c a 3 Ρ trans 4 Ρ Ρ c 0 C F Ρ trans a a F C F F E Ρ c a

Phase diagram 3.0 c 0 1,c 1 0.5,a 1 s gcan Ρ 2.5 s fluid Ρ 2.0 s can Ρ 1.5 s cond Ρ,Ρ c 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 Ρ c Ρ c a 3 Ρ trans 4 Ρ Ρ c 0 C F Ρ trans a a F C F F E Ρ c a a = ρ trans ρ c ( s fluid (ρ trans ) s fluid (ρ c ) )/ log c 0 c 1

Phase diagram bulk density Ρ c F E F F C C F Ρ C F Ρ trans a F C F Ρ c a Ρ c F E 0 Ρ c Ρ c a Ρ Ρ trans 0 a a = ρ trans ρ c ( s fluid (ρ trans ) s fluid (ρ c ) )/ log c 0 c 1

Metastability Number of particles in the background (bulk): Σ bg L (η) := Σ xη x max x Λ L η x, ρ bulk (η) = 1 L Σbg L (η)

Metastability Number of particles in the background (bulk): Σ bg L (η) := Σ xη x max x Λ L η x, ρ bulk (η) = 1 L Σbg L (η) Second result 1 L log π ( L,N {Σ bg L = S L} ) I ρ (ρ bg ) [0, ] as L, N/L ρ, S L /L ρ bg,

Metastability Number of particles in the background (bulk): Σ bg L (η) := Σ xη x max x Λ L η x, ρ bulk (η) = 1 L Σbg L (η) Second result 1 L log π ( L,N {Σ bg L = S L} ) I ρ (ρ bg ) [0, ] as L, N/L ρ, S L /L ρ bg, where for ρ bg ρ I ρ (ρ bg ) = s can (ρ) s fluid (ρ bg ) { (ρ a ρbg ) log c 0 c 1, ρ bg ρ a 0, ρ bg ρ a

Metastability 0.8 0.6 Ρ 1.2 Ρ 2 IΡ Ρ bg 0.4 0.2 Ρ Ρ c a 0.0 0 0.5 Ρ c Ρ c a 2 Ρ trans Ρ bg

Metastability 0.8 0.6 Ρ 2 Ρ 3 IΡ Ρ bg 0.4 0.2 Ρ Ρ trans 0.0 0 0.5 Ρ c Ρ c a 2 Ρ trans 3 3.5 Ρ bg

Life-times Σ bg ( ) L η(t) is a simple random walk (non-markovian) with stationary large deviation function I ρ

Life-times Σ bg L ( η(t) ) is a simple random walk (non-markovian) with stationary large deviation function I ρ Life-times τ L exp(lξ) (Arrhenius law) 0.8 0.6 Ρ 2 Ρ 3 IΡ Ρ bg 0.4 0.2 Ρ Ρ trans 0.0 0 0.5 Ρ c Ρ c a 2 Ρ trans 3 3.5 Ρ bg

Life-times Σ bg ( ) L η(t) is a simple random walk (non-markovian) with stationary large deviation function I ρ Life-times τ L exp(lξ) (Arrhenius law) ξ fluid (ρ) = s fluid (ρ) s fluid (ρ a) ξ cond (ρ) = s fluid (ρ c ) s fluid (ρ a) + (ρ a ρ c ) log c 0 c 1

Life-times 0.8 0.6 Ξ 0.4 Ξ fluid Ρ Ξ cond Ρ 0.2 0 0 1 Ρ c a 2 Ρ trans 3 3.5 Ρ

Life-times Τ L Ρtrans 10 8 10 7 10 6 10 5 10 4 condensed fluid 40 60 80 100 120 L P Τ L Τ L t 1.00 0.70 0.50 Exp t 0.30 L 80 90 0.20 100 110 0.15 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 t ρ = ρ trans

Summary Results first order transition for size-dep. jump rates metastable phases, ergodicity breaking iidrv s with distribution depending on number of rv s Introduction Results Conclusion

Summary Results first order transition for size-dep. jump rates metastable phases, ergodicity breaking iidrv s with distribution depending on number of rv s Work in progress use current matching heuristics for more general systems relevant for granular clustering, including coarsening prove Arrhenius law? Introduction Results Conclusion

Dependence on the number of particles g ( η x, Σ L (η) ) = { c0, η x aσ L (η) c 1, η x > aσ L (η), a [0, 1) Introduction Results Conclusion

Dependence on the number of particles g ( η x, Σ L (η) ) = { c0, η x aσ L (η) c 1, η x > aσ L (η), a [0, 1) Ρ 10 8 6 4 C F Ρ trans a Ρ c a F C Ρ meta a 2 F E Ρ c 0 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 a Introduction Results Conclusion

Dependence on the number of particles g ( η x, Σ L (η) ) = { c0, η x aσ L (η) c 1, η x > aσ L (η), a [0, 1) 0.7 c 0 2, c 1 1, a 0.2 0.6 0.5 s gcan Ρ s can 0.4 s flluid Ρ c s cond Ρ 0.3 0.2 0.1 s fluid Ρ 0.0 0 0.5 Ρ meta Ρ c a 2 Ρ trans 3 4 Ρ Introduction Results Conclusion

Heuristics matching currents: j fluid (ρ bg ) = φ(ρ bg ) = c 0 ρ bg 1 + ρ bg Introduction Results Conclusion

Heuristics ρ bg matching currents: j fluid (ρ bg ) = φ(ρ bg ) = c 0 1 + ρ bg j cond (ρ, ρ bg ) := lim g ( R (ρ ρbg ) L ) L Introduction Results Conclusion

Heuristics ρ bg matching currents: j fluid (ρ bg ) = φ(ρ bg ) = c 0 1 + ρ bg j cond (ρ, ρ bg ) := lim g ( R (ρ ρbg ) L ) L c 0 Φ cond Ρ,Ρ bg Φ c 1 Φ Ρ bg 0 Ρ c Ρ a Ρ Ρ bg Introduction Results Conclusion

Another example g L (k) = 1 + 1 (k/l) + 1 { 1, as k 2, as L Introduction Results Conclusion

Another example g L (k) = 1 + 1 (k/l) + 1 { 1, as k 2, as L 2.0 1.5 Φ 1.0 Φ cond Ρ meta,ρ bg Φ cond 5,Ρ bg 0.5 Φ Ρ bg 0.0 0 Ρ bg 5 Ρ bg Ρ crit Ρ meta 5 Ρ bg Introduction Results Conclusion

Another example g L (k) = 1 + 1 (k/l) + 1 { 1, as k 2, as L 1.0 s gcan Ρ 0.5 s fluid Ρ s 0.0 can s flluid Ρ bg s cond Ρ,Ρ bg 0.5 1.0 0 Ρ c 2 3 Ρ trans 5 6 7 8 Ρ meta Ρ Introduction Results Conclusion