Accreting neutron stars provide a unique environment for nuclear reactions

Similar documents
At low excitation, the compound nucleus de-excites by statistical emission of light particles (n,p,α)

X-ray superburst ~10 42 ergs Annual solar output ~10 41 ergs. Cumming et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 559, L127 (2001) (2)

Accreting Neutron Stars

PHL424: Nuclear fusion

Photons in the universe. Indian Institute of Technology Ropar

Nuclear Astrophysics II

Microscopic Fusion Dynamics Based on TDHF

Nuclear Reactions. Shape, interaction, and excitation structures of nuclei. scattered particles. detector. solid angle. target. transmitted particles

A Comparison between Channel Selections in Heavy Ion Reactions

Author(s) Tatsuzawa, Ryotaro; Takaki, Naoyuki. Citation Physics Procedia (2015), 64:

Heavy-ion sub-barrier fusion reactions: a sensitive tool to probe nuclear structure

Physics opportunities with the AT-TPC. D. Bazin NSCL/MSU at ReA

Heavy-ion fusion reactions for superheavy elements Kouichi Hagino

Nuclear Reactions A Z. Radioactivity, Spontaneous Decay: Nuclear Reaction, Induced Process: x + X Y + y + Q Q > 0. Exothermic Endothermic

Proximity Decay and Tidal Effects

SURROGATE REACTIONS. An overview of papers by Jason Burke from LLNL

Annax-I. Investigation of multi-nucleon transfer reactions in

Photon Interactions in Matter

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

Subbarrier fusion of carbon isotopes ~ from resonance structure to fusion oscillations ~

in2p , version 1-28 Nov 2008

Heavy-ion fusion reactions and superheavy elements. Kouichi Hagino

PHL424: Feynman diagrams

Towards a microscopic theory for low-energy heavy-ion reactions

Method of active correlations in the experiment 249 Cf+ 48 Ca n

Chemical Engineering 412

Charged-particle evaporation from hot 164 Yb compound nuclei and the role of 5 He emission

PoS(ENAS 6)050. Resonances in 19 Ne with relevance to the astrophysically important 18 F(p,α) 15 O reaction

13 Synthesis of heavier elements. introduc)on to Astrophysics, C. Bertulani, Texas A&M-Commerce 1

SIMULATION OF LASER INDUCED NUCLEAR REACTIONS

Nuclear Physics. PHY232 Remco Zegers Room W109 cyclotron building.

APEX CARE INSTITUTE FOR PG - TRB, SLET AND NET IN PHYSICS

Compound and heavy-ion reactions

Spectroscopy of light exotic nuclei using resonance scattering in inverse kinematics.

The Ring Branch. Nuclear Reactions at. Mass- and Lifetime Measurements. off Exotic Nuclei. Internal Targets. Electron and p. Experiments: Scattering

Photonuclear Reactions and Nuclear Transmutation. T. Tajima 1 and H. Ejiri 2

Lise Meitner, Otto Hahn. Nuclear Fission Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim

Studying the nuclear pairing force through. Zack Elledge and Dr. Gregory Christian

Charged-Particle Interactions in Matter

Nuclear Reactions and Astrophysics: a (Mostly) Qualitative Introduction

Introduc7on: heavy- ion poten7al model for sub- barrier fusion calcula7ons

nuclear states nuclear stability

He-Burning in massive Stars

Fission fragment mass distributions via prompt γ -ray spectroscopy

CHEM 312: Lecture 9 Part 1 Nuclear Reactions

The origin of heavy elements in the solar system

Neutron Interactions Part I. Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics Y2.5321

Doppler Correction after Inelastic Heavy Ion Scattering 238 U Ta system at the Coulomb barrier

Testing the shell closure at N=82 via multinucleon transfer reactions at energies around the Coulomb barrier

Research at FSU, using RESOLUT facility Development of and research with two new detector-systems

100 m down and light-years away: Nuclear science in an extreme laboratory

Physics with Exotic Nuclei

Chapter V: Interactions of neutrons with matter

2 Give the compound nucleus resulting from 6-MeV protons bombarding a target of. my notes in the part 3 reading room or on the WEB.

Study of Isospin simmetry using the PARIS detector. Alice Mentana

What Powers the Stars?

Radiative Capture Reaction

Resonant Reactions direct reactions:

Compound Nucleus Reactions

Chapter 30 Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity

Microscopic (TDHF and DC-TDHF) study of heavy-ion fusion and capture reactions with neutron-rich nuclei


Sub-barrier fusion of Si+Si systems : does the deformation of 28 Si play a role?

Charge Exchange and Weak Strength for Astrophysics

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

Nuclear burning on! accreting neutron stars. Andrew Cumming! McGill University

Nuclear contribution into single-event upset in 3D on-board electronics at moderate energy cosmic proton impact

Resonance scattering and α- transfer reactions for nuclear astrophysics.

Interaction of Particles and Matter

I. 2. Reduction of the Gamow-Teller Matrix Element for the β-decay in 70 Ga- 70 Zn by the 35-MeV (p,n) Reaction on 70 Zn

14 Supernovae (short overview) introduc)on to Astrophysics, C. Bertulani, Texas A&M-Commerce 1

two-proton radioactivity discovery of two-proton radioactivity experimental results with TPC s future studies

What do we measure, and how do we measure it?

TDHF Basic Facts. Advantages. Shortcomings

(10%) (c) What other peaks can appear in the pulse-height spectrum if the detector were not small? Give a sketch and explain briefly.

Direct (α,p) Reaction Measurements with HELIOS and the study of 20 Ne(α,p) 23 Na

Status of the magnetic spectrometer PRISMA

Stability of heavy elements against alpha and cluster radioactivity

Physic 492 Lecture 16

NSCL and Physics and Astronomy Department, Michigan State University Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics

TIGRESS Auxiliary Detectors

Fusion and other applications of density-constrained TDDFT

Inclusive breakup measurements of the 7 Li+ 119 Sn system.

Progress in measuring GMR in unstable nuclei: Decay detector calibration and inverse reaction experiment. J. Button, Y.-W. Lui, and D.H.

HiRA: Science and Design Considerations

energy loss Ionization + excitation of atomic energy levels Mean energy loss rate de /dx proportional to (electric charge) 2 of incident particle

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 3 Homework 1 Nuclear Phenomenology

Lecture 10: Fission Conceptual process Fissionability Decay rate Decay branching Mass distribution Kinetic energy Neutrons

Searching for high-spin toroidal isomers in collisions induced by α-conjugate nuclei

FAVORABLE HOT FUSION REACTION FOR SYNTHESIS OF NEW SUPERHEAVY NUCLIDE 272 Ds

Nuclear Physics. Radioactivity. # protons = # neutrons. Strong Nuclear Force. Checkpoint 4/17/2013. A Z Nucleus = Protons+ Neutrons

Physics of neutron-rich nuclei

Probing quasifission in reactions forming Rn nucleus

New theoretical insights on the physics of compound nuclei from laser-nucleus reactions

Inner Transition Metals

Sub-barrier fusion enhancement due to neutron transfer

Sunday Monday Thursday. Friday

Microscopic DC-TDHF study of heavy-ion potentials and fusion cross sections

Thursday, April 23, 15. Nuclear Physics

There are 82 protons in a lead nucleus. Why doesn t the lead nucleus burst apart?

Transcription:

, Tracy Steinbach, Jon Schmidt, Varinderjit Singh, Sylvie Hudan, Romualdo de Souza, Lagy Baby, Sean Kuvin, Ingo Wiedenhover Accreting neutron stars provide a unique environment for nuclear reactions High density (~10 14 g/cm 3 ), relatively low temperatures (~10 6 K), large neutron abundance (90% of the mass) Identified as the origin of X-ray superbursts Releases more energy in a few hours than our sun does in a decade X-ray superbursts thought to be fueled by 12 C+ 12 C fusion in the outer crust Temperature of the outer crust is too low (~3 10 6 K) relative to the Coulomb barrier for 12 C fusion A potential heat source is the fusion of neutron-rich light nuclei (eg. 24 O + 24 O)

Density Constrained Time-Dependent Hartree-Fock calculations Fully microscopic many-body theory No free parameters Only input is the nuclear effective interaction 20 O + 12 C DC-TDHF calculations predict a fusion enhancement for neutron-rich systems Experimental measurements of the fusion cross-section provide a test of the fusion models Umar et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 055801 (2012) 2

18 OO + 12 CC 30 SSSS 28 SSSS + 2nn 28 AAAA + pp + nn 25 MMMM + αα + nn Evaporation residues Excited compound nucleus decays by emitting neutrons, protons, and α particles EE = EE cc.mm. + QQ QQ = 23.649 MMMMMM Evaporated particles The resulting heavy nucleus is known as an evaporation residue Beam Residue Stop Time Energy Emission of these light particles impart transverse momentum on the residue, kicking them off zero degrees and allowing for direct measurement of the residues and light particles Start Time Light Particle EE = 1 2 mmmm2 mm EEEE 2 3

~130 cm ~16 cm 18 O beam US MCP Tgt MCP T3 T2 E lab = 13.75 36 MeV Intensity of ~ 1-4.5 10 5 pps Beam count measured between US and Tgt MCP detectors Energy measured in segmented annular silicon detectors (T2,T3) Fusion product time-of-flight measured between target MCP and Si detectors Reaction products distinguished by energy and time-of-flight 4

Beam E B E x B fields transport electrons from foil to MCP E field produced by biasing array of ring plates B field produced by NdFeB permanent magnets Timing resolution ~300 ps Single crystal Si(IP) detectors Subtend 4.5 θ lab 21 Segmented to provide angular resolution and reduce detector capacitance Timing resolution ~450 ps 5

Crosssection σσ = NN IIII Number of residues Beam count Target thickness T.K. Steinbach et al., PRC 90, 041603(R) (2014) 6 Intense peak corresponds to elastically scattered beam particles Points in the band originating from this peak are slit scattered beam particles Evaporation residues are found in the island with longer TOF values than the beam scatter line α particles correspond to the band with very short TOF values

Data fit to functional form that describes the penetration of an inverted parabolic barrier Comparison with TDHF reveals a different shape, emphasized by the ratio between the experimental and theoretical excitation functions Increase in the ratio can be interpreted as a larger tunneling probability, which can be associated with a narrower barrier Deviation increases dramatically at energies below 7 MeV, highlighting the importance of subbarrier measurements 7

σ Measured the fusion cross-section down to the ~650 µb level New data consistent with previous measurements Deviation from DC-TDHF predictions continues to increase as E cm decreases 8

While the statistical model calculations describe the small angle component relatively well, they underpredict the large angle component 9 The alpha angular distribution has a negative slope because of the forward momentum in the lab frame

Recoil considerations suggest that the low energy and large angle components of the residue distributions could be residues resulting from α emission 10 <E> of the low energy component of the total distribution represented here as dashed line Coincident measurement of evaporation residues and α particles demonstrates that the low energy component is associated with α channels

TT EE aa aa = Level density parameter < EE cc.mm. αα > = VV BBBBBBBBBBBBBB + 2TT The peaks of the distributions shift lower as incident energy decreases 11

TT EE aa aa = Level density parameter < EE cc.mm. αα > = VV BBBBBBBBBBBBBB + 2TT The peaks of the distributions shift lower as incident energy decreases Experimental α energy distribution reasonably described by evapor statistical model calculation 11

<E α > increases linearly with increasing E* PACE4 band shown for a = A/12 A/8 evapor shown with a = A/8 Energy distribution widths sensitive to T Since the widths represented by the models are approximately the same as the measured widths, T is approximately the same <E c.m. (α)> = V Barrier + 2T α emission is reasonably described by statistical decay 12

As E* increases, α emission becomes an increasingly important channel in the de-excitation process With increasing E c.m., the measured σ α increasingly deviates from statistical model predictions 13

As E* increases, α emission becomes an increasingly important channel in the de-excitation process With increasing E c.m., the measured σ α increasingly deviates from statistical model predictions Similar systems also exhibit the same features of σ α The n + 28 Si 29 Si* system suggests this enhancement is an entrance channel effect 13

Measured the fusion cross-section of 18 O + 12 C down to the submillibarn level Different shape of the experimental excitation function compared to DC-TDHF calculations suggests a different barrier The increasing deviation from DC-TDHF predictions with decreasing incident energy highlights the importance of measuring the cross section below the barrier A large σ α with energy and angular distributions described by statistical decay, along with an increase in the σ α /σ fusion with increasing E c.m. could signal the survival of the α cluster structure of the projectile/target through the fusion process 14

Extract mass distributions of the residues Analyze data from the 19 O + 12 C 31 Si* experiment currently being conducted Prepare to measure the fusion cross-section and de-excitation of 39,47 K + 28 Si 67,75 As* using NSCL s ReA3 reaccelerator facility Enrich an oxide target to measure the fusion cross-section and de-excitation of 16,17,18 O + 18 O 30,31,32 S* 15

Indiana University Romualdo de Souza, Sylvie Hudan, Tracy Steinbach, Jon Schmidt, Varinderjit Singh Florida State University Lagy Baby, Ingo Wiedenhover DOE under Grant No. DE-FG02-88ER-40404 16

17

As the neutron star accretes material from its companion star, H and He burning occurs The ashes are then pushed further down as the neutron star accretes more material Density increases, allowing further reactions such as neutron capture, electron capture, and fusion, creating a mass-stratified outer crust Statistical decay of compound nuclei formed through fusion in the outer crust increases He concentration in mid-mass regions, potentially enabling asymmetric reactions Outer Crust of an Accreting Neutron Star Atmosphere: Accreted H/He Ocean: Carbon + Heavy Elements Heavy Elements Crust Density Depth ~10 5 g/cm 3 5 m ~10 9 g/cm 3 30 m ~10 10 g/cm 3 100 m 18