Harmonic Mappings for which Second Dilatation is Janowski Functions

Similar documents
Harmonic Mappings Related to the Bounded Boundary Rotation

Growth and distortion theorem for the Janowski alpha-spirallike functions in the unit disc

Two Points-Distortion Theorems for Multivalued Starlike Functions

An Investigation on Minimal Surfaces of Multivalent Harmonic Functions 1

A Class of Univalent Harmonic Mappings

Notes on Starlike log-harmonic Functions. of Order α

SOME PROPERTIES OF A SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY A GENERALIZED SRIVASTAVA-ATTIYA OPERATOR. Nagat. M. Mustafa and Maslina Darus

ON STRONG ALPHA-LOGARITHMICALLY CONVEX FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction and Preliminaries

On Some α-convex Functions

JANOWSKI STARLIKE LOG-HARMONIC UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

On a new class of (j, i)-symmetric function on conic regions

Old and new order of linear invariant family of harmonic mappings and the bound for Jacobian

SOME SUBCLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR. Maslina Darus and Imran Faisal

ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS No 18/2009 SOME SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS. Firas Ghanim and Maslina Darus

On a class of analytic functions related to Hadamard products

Mapping problems and harmonic univalent mappings

a n z n, z U.. (1) f(z) = z + n=2 n=2 a nz n and g(z) = z + (a 1n...a mn )z n,, z U. n=2 a(a + 1)b(b + 1) z 2 + c(c + 1) 2! +...

Coefficient bounds for some subclasses of p-valently starlike functions

Quasi-Convex Functions with Respect to Symmetric Conjugate Points

Uniformly convex functions II

Int. J. Open Problems Complex Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2011 ISSN ; Copyright c ICSRS Publication,

Properties of Starlike Functions with Respect to Conjugate Points

Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis ISSN: (electronic)

CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF STARLIKE AND CONVEX FUNCTIONS OF COMPLEX ORDER

The Inner Mapping Radius of Harmonic Mappings of the Unit Disk 1

Second Hankel Determinant Problem for a Certain Subclass of Univalent Functions

Subclass Of K Uniformly Starlike Functions Associated With Wright Generalized Hypergeometric Functions

Convolution and Subordination Properties of Analytic Functions with Bounded Radius Rotations

Abstract. We derive a sharp bound for the modulus of the Schwarzian derivative of concave univalent functions with opening angle at infinity

DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATION RESULTS FOR NEW CLASSES OF THE FAMILY E(Φ, Ψ)

SUBORDINATION RESULTS FOR CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF UNIVALENT MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

Harmonic multivalent meromorphic functions. defined by an integral operator

Convex Functions and Functions with Bounded Turning

Hankel determinant for p-valently starlike and convex functions of order α

Starlike Functions of Complex Order

Research Article New Classes of Analytic Functions Involving Generalized Noor Integral Operator

On a subclass of certain p-valent starlike functions with negative coefficients 1

ON THE FEKETE-SZEGÖ INEQUALITY FOR A CLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY USING GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR

INTEGRAL MEANS OF UNIVALENT SOLUTION FOR FRACTIONAL EQUATION IN COMPLEX PLANE. Rabha W. Ibrahim and Maslina Darus

Harmonic Mappings and Shear Construction. References. Introduction - Definitions

Subclass of Meromorphic Functions with Positive Coefficients Defined by Frasin and Darus Operator

Radius of close-to-convexity and fully starlikeness of harmonic mappings

A Note on Coefficient Inequalities for (j, i)-symmetrical Functions with Conic Regions

Numerical Range in C*-Algebras

NEW SUBCLASS OF MULTIVALENT HYPERGEOMETRIC MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATION FOR MEROMORPHIC MULTIVALENT QUASI-CONVEX FUNCTIONS. Maslina Darus and Imran Faisal. 1. Introduction and preliminaries

Coefficient Estimate for Two Subclasses with Certain Close-to-Convex Functions

ON CERTAIN CLASS OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS WITH CONIC DOMAINS INVOLVING SOKÓ L - NUNOKAWA CLASS

THE FEKETE-SZEGÖ COEFFICIENT FUNCTIONAL FOR TRANSFORMS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS. Communicated by Mohammad Sal Moslehian. 1.

Coefficient Estimates and Bloch s Constant in Some Classes of Harmonic Mappings

Fekete-Szegö Inequality for Certain Classes of Analytic Functions Associated with Srivastava-Attiya Integral Operator

Convolution Properties of Convex Harmonic Functions

Cesáro partial sums of certain analytic functions

Certain classes of p-valent analytic functions with negative coefficients and (λ, p)-starlike with respect to certain points

STARLIKE MAPPINGS OF ORDER α ON THE UNIT BALL IN COMPLEX BANACH SPACES

Coecient bounds for certain subclasses of analytic functions of complex order

SUBCLASS OF HARMONIC STARLIKE FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH SALAGEAN DERIVATIVE

DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATION ASSOCIATED WITH NEW GENERALIZED DERIVATIVE OPERATOR

CONCAVE MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS INVOLVING CONSTRUCTED OPERATORS. M. Al-Kaseasbeh, M. Darus

STRONG DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATION AND SUPERORDINATION OF NEW GENERALIZED DERIVATIVE OPERATOR. Anessa Oshah and Maslina Darus

arxiv: v1 [math.cv] 19 Jul 2012

The Order of Starlikeness of New p-valent Meromorphic Functions

Coefficient Bounds for Certain Subclasses of Analytic Function Involving Hadamard Products

SOME APPLICATIONS OF SALAGEAN INTEGRAL OPERATOR. Let A denote the class of functions of the form: f(z) = z + a k z k (1.1)

An ordinary differentail operator and its applications to certain classes of multivalently meromorphic functions

Fekete-Szegö Problem for Certain Subclass of Analytic Univalent Function using Quasi-Subordination

Subordinate Solutions of a Differential Equation

Subclasses of bi-univalent functions related to shell-like curves connected with Fibonacci numbers

On the improvement of Mocanu s conditions

A NOTE ON UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS WITH FINITELY MANY COEFFICIENTS. Abstract

ON SOME LENGTH PROBLEMS FOR ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

Second Hankel determinant for the class of Bazilevic functions

arxiv: v1 [math.cv] 17 Nov 2016

SUBORDINATION AND SUPERORDINATION FOR FUNCTIONS BASED ON DZIOK-SRIVASTAVA LINEAR OPERATOR

arxiv: v1 [math.cv] 28 Mar 2017

Certain properties of a new subclass of close-to-convex functions

An Application of Wilf's Subordinating Factor Sequence on Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions

Applied Mathematics Letters

SOME INCLUSION PROPERTIES OF STARLIKE AND CONVEX FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH HOHLOV OPERATOR. II

UDC S. Yu. Graf ON THE SCHWARZIAN NORM OF HARMONIC MAPPINGS

On certain subclasses of analytic functions

FABER POLYNOMIAL COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES FOR A NEW SUBCLASS OF MEROMORPHIC BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS ADNAN GHAZY ALAMOUSH, MASLINA DARUS

A note on a subclass of analytic functions defined by a generalized Sălăgean and Ruscheweyh operator

Weak Subordination for Convex Univalent Harmonic Functions

Möbius Transformation

Research Article A Study on Becker s Univalence Criteria

Meromorphic Starlike Functions with Alternating and Missing Coefficients 1

On Certain Class of Meromorphically Multivalent Reciprocal Starlike Functions Associated with the Liu-Srivastava Operator Defined by Subordination

Coefficient Inequalities for Classes of Uniformly. Starlike and Convex Functions Defined by Generalized. Ruscheweyh Operator

HADAMARD PRODUCT OF CERTAIN CLASSES OF FUNCTIONS

On a New Subclass of Salagean Type Analytic Functions

BOUNDEDNESS, UNIVALENCE AND QUASICONFORMAL EXTENSION OF ROBERTSON FUNCTIONS. Ikkei Hotta and Li-Mei Wang

Convolution properties for subclasses of meromorphic univalent functions of complex order. Teodor Bulboacă, Mohamed K. Aouf, Rabha M.

THIRD HANKEL DETERMINANT FOR THE INVERSE OF RECIPROCAL OF BOUNDED TURNING FUNCTIONS HAS A POSITIVE REAL PART OF ORDER ALPHA

Rosihan M. Ali, M. Hussain Khan, V. Ravichandran, and K. G. Subramanian. Let A(p, m) be the class of all p-valent analytic functions f(z) = z p +

Majorization Properties for Subclass of Analytic p-valent Functions Defined by the Generalized Hypergeometric Function

j(z) > + FZ f(z) z + oz f(z) 1-.F < 1-.F zf (z) } 1 E (z 6 U,F 1). (1.3) >/(z e u) ANGULAR ESTIMATIONS OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS

Research Article A New Class of Meromorphic Functions Associated with Spirallike Functions

carries the circle w 1 onto the circle z R and sends w = 0 to z = a. The function u(s(w)) is harmonic in the unit circle w 1 and we obtain

INTEGRAL MEANS AND COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES ON PLANAR HARMONIC MAPPINGS

Transcription:

Mathematica Aeterna, Vol. 3, 2013, no. 8, 617-624 Harmonic Mappings for which Second Dilatation is Janowski Functions Emel Yavuz Duman İstanbul Kültür University Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Ataköy Campus 34156, İstanbul, Turkey Yaşar Polatoğlu İstanbul Kültür University Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Ataköy Campus 34156, İstanbul, Turkey Yasemin Kahramaner İstanbul Commerce University Department of Mathematics Üsküdar Campus 34672, İstanbul, Turkey Maslina Darus Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia School of Mathematical Sceinces 43600 angi, Selangor D. Ehsan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Abstract In the present paper we extend the fundamental property that if h(z) and g(z) are regular functions in the open unit disc D with the properties h(0) = g(0) = 0, h maps D onto many-sheeted region which is starlike with respect to the origin, and Re g (z) > 0, then Reg(z) h(z) > 0, introduced by R.J. Libera [5] to the Janowski functions and give some applications of this to the harmonic functions.

618 Emel Yavuz Duman,Yaşar Polatoğlu,Yasemin Kahramaner and Maslina Darus Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45; 30C55 Keywords: Harmonic mappings, Janowski functions, growth theorem, distortion theorem, coefficient inequality 1 Introduction Let Ω be the class of functions φ(z) regular in the open unit disc D = {z C z < 1} and satisfy the conditions φ(0) = 0, φ(z) < 1 for all z D. For arbitrary fixed numbers A,, 1 < A 1, 1 < A we denote by P(A,) the family of functions p(z) = 1 + p 1 z + p 2 z 2 + regular in D such that p(z) is in P(A,) if and only if p(z) = 1+Aφ(z) 1+φ(z) for some function φ(z) Ω and every z D. Let S (A,) denote the family of functions s(z) = z +c 2 z 2 + regular in D such that s(z) in S (A,) if and only if z s (z) s(z) (1) = p(z) (2) for some p(z) in P(A,) and all z D. We note that every function in this family maps the unit disc univalently onto a region wihich is starlike with respect to the origin. Let s 1 (z) = z+d 2 z 2 + and s 2 (z) = z+e 2 z 2 + be analytic functions in D. If there exists φ(z) Ω such that s 1 (z) = s 2 (φ(z)), then we say that s 1 (z) is subordinate to s 2 (z) and write s 1 (z) s 2 (z) so that s 1 (D) s 2 (D). Finally, univalent harmonic functions are generalization of univalent analytic functions the point of the departure is the canonical representation f = h(z)+g(z), g(0) = 0 (3) of a harmonic function f in the unit disc D as the sum of an analytic function h(z) and conjugate of an analytic function g(z). With the convention that g(0) = 0, the representation is unique. The power series expansions of h(z) and g(z) are denoted by h(z) = a n z n, g(z) = b n z n. (4) n=0 If f is sense-preserving harmonic mapping of D onto some other region, then by Lewy s theorem its Jacobian is strictly positive, i.e, n=0 J f(z) = 2 g (z) 2 > 0.

Harmonic Mappings for which Second Dilatation is Janowski Functions 619 Equivalently, the inequality g (z) < holds for all z D. This shows, in particular, that h (0) 0 and h (0) = 1. The class of all sense-preserving harmonic mapping of the disc with a 0 = b 0 = 0, a 1 = 1 will be denoted by S H. Thus S H contains the standard class S of analytic univalent functions. Although the analytic part h(z) of a function f S H is locally univalent, it will be come apparent that it not be univalent. The class of functions f S H with g (0) = 0 will be denoted by SH 0. At the same time, we note that S H is a normal family and SH 0 is a compact normal family. For details, see [2]. Now, we consider the following class of harmonic mappings in the plane { SHPST = f = h(z)+g(z) f S H, h(z) S (A,), w(z) = g (z) } b 1 P(A,), 1 < A 1. InthispaperwewillinvestigatethesubclassS HPST. Wewillneedthefollowing theorems in the sequel. Theorem 1.1 [4] Let h(z) be an element of S (A,), then where C(r, A, ) h(z) C(r,A,), (5) C(r,A,) = {r(1+r) A re Ar, = 0. These bounds are sharp, being attained at the point z = re iθ, 0 θ 2π, by respectively, where f 0 (z;a,) = f = zf 0 (z; A, ), (6) f = zf 0 (z;a,), (7) {(1+e iθ z) A re Ae iθz, = 0. Theorem 1.2 [6] If h(z) = z +a 2 z 2 + belongs to S (A,), then a n { n 2 (A )+k k=0 n 2 k=0 k+1, 0, A k+1 0. These bound are sharp because the extremal function is {(1+z) A f (z) = re Az, = 0. Lemma 1.3 (Jack s Lemma, [3]) Let φ(z) be regular in the unit disc D, with φ(0) = 0. Then if φ(z) attains its maximum value on the circle z = r at the point z 1, one has z 1 φ (z 1 ) = kφ(z 1 ) for some k 1.

620 Emel Yavuz Duman,Yaşar Polatoğlu,Yasemin Kahramaner and Maslina Darus 2 Main Results Theorem 2.1 If h(z) and g(z) are regular in D such that h(0) = g(0) = 0. If h(z) S (A,) and g (z) g(z) b 1 P(A,), then P(A,). b 1 h(z) Proof. Since the linear transformation 1+Az maps z = r onto the disc with ( ) 1+z 1 Ar the center C(r) = 2,0 and the radius ρ(r) = (A )r and using the 1 2 r 2 1 2 r 2 subordination principle we can write so thus 1 g (z) b 1 1+Az 1+z g (z) b 1+Az 1 1+z 1 g (z) b 1 1 Ar2 1 2 r 2 (A )r 1 2 r 2 g (z) b 1(1 Ar 2 ) 1 2 r 2 b 1 (A )r. (8) 1 2 r 2 The inequality (8) shows that the values of g (z)/ are in the disc { } g (z) h D r (b 1 ) = (z) g (z) b 1(1 Ar 2 ) 1 2 r b 1 (A )r, 0, 2 1 2 r { } 2 g (z) g (z) b 1 b 1 Ar, = 0. Now we define a function φ(z) by g(z) h(z) = b 1+Aφ(z) 1 1+φ(z). Then φ(z) is analytic in D, φ(0) = 0. On the other hand since h(z) S (A,) then z h (z) h(z) D r = 1 Ar2 1 2 r (A )r, 0, 2 1 2 r 2 z h (z) 1 h(z) Ar, = 0 for all z = r < 1. Thus, for a point z 1 on the bound of this disc we have or z 1 h (z 1 ) h(z 1 ) 1 Ar2 1 2 r 2 = (A )r 1 2 r 2eiθ, 0, z 1 h (z 1 ) h(z 1 ) 1 = Areiθ, 0, h(z 1 ) z 1 h(z 1 ) = 1 2 r 2 [1 Ar 2 ]+(A )re D r, 0, iθ h(z 1 ) z 1 h(z 1 ) = 1 1+Are D r, 0, iθ

Harmonic Mappings for which Second Dilatation is Janowski Functions 621 where D r is the boundary of the disc D r. Therefore, by Jack s lemma, z 1 φ (z 1 ) = kφ(z 1 ) and k 1, we have that { 1+Aφ(z1 w(z 1 ) = g ) (z 1 ) b 1 h (z 1 ) = / w(d (1 Ar 2 )+(A )re iθ r (b 1 )), 0, 1 1+Aφ(z 1 )+Akφ(z 1 ) / w(d 1+Are iθ r (b 1 )), = 0, (9) because φ(z 1 ) = 1 and k 1. ut this is a contradiction to the condition g (z) b 1 1+Az 1+z 1+φ(z 1 ) + (A )kφ(z 1) (1+φ(z 1 )) 2 1 2 r 2 and so we have φ(z) < 1 for all z D. Lemma 2.2 Let f = h(z) + g(z) S H, then for a function defined by ω(z) = g (z) we have b and for all z = r < 1. 1 r 1 b 1 r ω(z) b 1 +r 1+ b 1 r, (10) (1 r 2 )(1 b 1 2 ) (1+ b 1 r) 2 1 ω(z) 2 (1 r2 )(1 b 1 2 ) (1 b 1 r) 2, (11) (1 r)(1+ b 1 ) 1 b 1 r 1+ ω(z) (1+r)(1+ b 1 ) 1+ b 1 r Proof. Since f = h(z)+g(z) S H, it follows that (12) ω(z) = g (z) = b 1 +2b 2 z + 1+2a 2 z + ω(0) = b 1 ω(z) < 1 ω(0) = b 1 < 1. So the function φ(z) = ω(z) ω(0) 1 ω(0)ω(z) = ω(z) b 1 1 b 1 ω(z) satisfies the conditions of Schwarz lemma. Therefore we have ω(z) = b 1 +φ(z) 1+b 1 φ(z) if and only if ω(z) b 1 +z 1+b 1 z ( ) b 1 +z 1+b 1 z) 1 b 1 2 r 2 (z D). (13) On the other hand, the linear transformation maps z = r onto the ( disc with the center C(r) = (1 r 2 )Re(b 1 ) 1 b 1, (1 r2 )Im(b 1 ) with the radius ρ(r) = 2 r 2 (1 b 1 2 )r 1 b 1. Then, we have 2 r 2 ω(z) b 1(1 r 2 ) 1 b 1 2 (1 b 1 2 )r 1 b 1 2 r, (14) 2 which gives (10), (11) and (13).

622 Emel Yavuz Duman,Yaşar Polatoğlu,Yasemin Kahramaner and Maslina Darus Corollary 2.3 Let f = h(z)+g(z) be an element of S HPST, then b 1 (1 Ar) 2 (1 r) A 3 and g (z) b 1 (1+Ar) 2 (1+r) A 3 b 1 (1 Ar) 2 e Ar g (z) b 1 (1+Ar) 2 e Ar, = 0, (15) b 1 r(1 Ar)(1 r) A 2 g(z) b 1 r(1+ar)(1+r) A 2 b 1 (1 Ar)e Ar g(z) b 1 (1+Ar)e Ar, = 0, (16) for all z = r < 1. Proof. Since h(z) S (A,), then we have z h (z) 1 Ar2 h(z) 1 2 r (A )r 1 Ar z 2 1 2 r 2 1 r h(z) 1+Ar, 0, 1+r z h (z) z 1 h(z) Ar 1 Ar h(z) 1+Ar, = 0, for all z D. Using Theorem 1.1 and after simple calculations we get (1 Ar)(1 r) A 2 (1+Ar)(1+r) A 2 (1 Ar)e Ar (1+Ar)e Ar, = 0. On the other hand, if we use Theorem 2.1, then we can write F(r, A,, b 1 ) g(z) h(z) F(r,A,, b 1 ), 0, F(r, A, b 1 ) g(z) F(r,A, b 1 ), = 0, and F(r, A, ) F(r, A) h(z) g (z) g (z) F(r,A,), 0, F(r,A), = 0, (17) (18) (19) (20) for all z = r < 1, where F(r,A,, b 1 ) = b 1 (1+Ar) 1+r and F 1 (r,a, b 1 ) = b 1 (1+Ar). Considering Theorem 1.1, and equations (18), (19) and (20), we get (15) and (16). Corollary 2.4 Let f = h(z)+g(z) be an element of SHPST (A,), then b 1 (1 Ar) 2 (1 r) 2(A 2) (1 r 2 )(1 b 1 2 ) (1+ b 1 r) 2 J f(z) b 1 (1+Ar) 2 (1 r) 2(A 2) b 1 (1 Ar) 2 e 2Ar(1 r2 )(1 b 1 2 ) (1+ b 1 r) 2 J f(z) (1 r 2 )(1 b 1 2 ) (1 b 1 r) 2, 0, b 1 (1+Ar) 2 e 2Ar(1 r2 )(1 b 1 2 ) (1 b 1 r) 2, = 0, (21)

Harmonic Mappings for which Second Dilatation is Janowski Functions 623 for all z = r < 1, where Proof. This is a consequence of Lemma 2.2 and the inequalities in (18). Corollary 2.5 Let f = h(z)+g(z) be an element of SHPST (A,), then ( ) 1 A [ ] b 1 2F 1 2 A,2 A,3 A, + b 1 b 1 A 2 b 1 1 2 (1+A)r2 F 1 [2,2 A ],1,3,r, b 1 r + b 1 1 3 Ar3 F 1 [3,2 A ],1,4,r, b 1 r b 1 (1 r) A + b 1 ( ) A [ ] b1 ( 1+r) (1+ b 1 r) 2F 1 2 A,2 A,3 A, + b 1 (1+ b 1 r) (A 2)(1+ b 1 r) 2 ( ) 1 A [ ] b1 2F 1 2 A,2 A,3 A,1 b 1 b 1 A 2 + b 1 1 2 (1+A)r2 F 1 [2,2 A ],1,3, r, b 1 r + b 1 1 3 Ar3 F 1 [3,2 A ],1,4, r, b 1 r b 1 (1 r) A + b 1 ( ) A [ ] b1 (1+r) (1+ b 1 r) 2F 1 2 A,2 A,3 A, b 1 (1+ b 1 r), (A 2)(1+ b 1 r) 2 f (22) for all z = r < 1, where 2 F 1 and F 1 are denote the Gauss and Appel hypergeometric functions, respectively [1]. Proof. Using Lemma 2.2 and the inequalities in (18), after the simple calculations, we get ( g (z) ) dz df ( + g (z) ) dz (1 w(z)) dz df (1+w(z)) dz b 1 (1 Ar)(1 r) A 2 (1 b 1 )(1 r) dr df 1+ b 1 r b 1 (1+Ar)(1+r) A 2 for all z = r < 1. Integrating the inequality (23), we obtain (22). (1+ b 1 )(1+r) dr 1+ b 1 r (23)

624 Emel Yavuz Duman,Yaşar Polatoğlu,Yasemin Kahramaner and Maslina Darus Theorem 2.6 Let f = h(z)+g(z) be an element of SHPST (A,), then b n+1 b 1 n+1 n+1 k=1 k(a ) k 2 m=0 Proof. Since f = h(z)+g(z) SHPST (A,), then we have Therefore, we can write p(z) = g (z), p(z) P(A,). b 1 (A )+m. (24) m+1 1+p 1 z +p 2 z 2 + +p n z n + = b 1 +2b 2 z + b 1 (1+2a 2 z + ) (1+p 1 z +p 2 z 2 + +p n z n + )(b 1 (1+2a 2 z + )) = b 1 +2b 2 z + b n+1 = b n+1 1 ka k p n k+1 (25) n+1 where a 1 1, p 0 1. Using Theorem 1.2 in (25) we obtain (24). References k=1 [1] Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I., Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover Pub., New York, 1970. [2] Duren, P., Harmonic mappings in the plane. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 156. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004. [3] Jack, I.S., Functions starlike and convex of order α, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 3 (1971), 469-474. [4] Janowski, W., Some extremal problems for certain families of analytic functions, I. Ann. Polon. Math. 28 (1973), 297-326. [5] Libera, R.J., Some classes of regular univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (1965) 755-758. [6] Polatoğlu, Y., olcal, M., A coefficient inequality for the class of analytic functions in the unit disc, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 59 (2003), 3753-3759. Received: September, 2013