@FMI c Kyung Moon Sa Co.

Similar documents
GENERATING CERTAIN QUINTIC IRREDUCIBLE POLYNOMIALS OVER FINITE FIELDS. Youngwoo Ahn and Kitae Kim

Relative controllability of nonlinear systems with delays in control

V.Abramov - FURTHER ANALYSIS OF CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR LARGE CLIENT/SERVER COMPUTER NETWORKS

SOME NOISELESS CODING THEOREMS OF INACCURACY MEASURE OF ORDER α AND TYPE β

Comparison of Differences between Power Means 1

Method of upper lower solutions for nonlinear system of fractional differential equations and applications

Existence and Uniqueness Results for Random Impulsive Integro-Differential Equation

Approximate Analytic Solution of (2+1) - Dimensional Zakharov-Kuznetsov(Zk) Equations Using Homotopy

Intuitionistic Fuzzy 2-norm

Dynamic Team Decision Theory. EECS 558 Project Shrutivandana Sharma and David Shuman December 10, 2005

ON THE WEAK LIMITS OF SMOOTH MAPS FOR THE DIRICHLET ENERGY BETWEEN MANIFOLDS

CH.3. COMPATIBILITY EQUATIONS. Continuum Mechanics Course (MMC) - ETSECCPB - UPC

On One Analytic Method of. Constructing Program Controls

CS286.2 Lecture 14: Quantum de Finetti Theorems II

Epistemic Game Theory: Online Appendix

HEAT CONDUCTION PROBLEM IN A TWO-LAYERED HOLLOW CYLINDER BY USING THE GREEN S FUNCTION METHOD

John Geweke a and Gianni Amisano b a Departments of Economics and Statistics, University of Iowa, USA b European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany

Mechanics Physics 151

On the numerical treatment ofthenonlinear partial differentialequation of fractional order

Part II CONTINUOUS TIME STOCHASTIC PROCESSES

How about the more general "linear" scalar functions of scalars (i.e., a 1st degree polynomial of the following form with a constant term )?

ON THE ADDITION OF UNITS AND NON-UNITS IN FINITE COMMUTATIVE RINGS

Cubic Bezier Homotopy Function for Solving Exponential Equations

Testing a new idea to solve the P = NP problem with mathematical induction

Survival Analysis and Reliability. A Note on the Mean Residual Life Function of a Parallel System

Solution in semi infinite diffusion couples (error function analysis)

On the stability of a Pexiderized functional equation in intuitionistic fuzzy Banach spaces

A Deza Frankl type theorem for set partitions

Tight results for Next Fit and Worst Fit with resource augmentation

DEEP UNFOLDING FOR MULTICHANNEL SOURCE SEPARATION SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

e-journal Reliability: Theory& Applications No 2 (Vol.2) Vyacheslav Abramov

. The geometric multiplicity is dim[ker( λi. number of linearly independent eigenvectors associated with this eigenvalue.

. The geometric multiplicity is dim[ker( λi. A )], i.e. the number of linearly independent eigenvectors associated with this eigenvalue.

( ) () we define the interaction representation by the unitary transformation () = ()

Robust and Accurate Cancer Classification with Gene Expression Profiling

Existence of Time Periodic Solutions for the Ginzburg-Landau Equations. model of superconductivity

Online Supplement for Dynamic Multi-Technology. Production-Inventory Problem with Emissions Trading

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE PC5202 ADVANCED STATISTICAL MECHANICS. (Semester II: AY ) Time Allowed: 2 Hours

( t) Outline of program: BGC1: Survival and event history analysis Oslo, March-May Recapitulation. The additive regression model

Notes on the stability of dynamic systems and the use of Eigen Values.

Track Properities of Normal Chain

On elements with index of the form 2 a 3 b in a parametric family of biquadratic elds

CS434a/541a: Pattern Recognition Prof. Olga Veksler. Lecture 4

Ordinary Differential Equations in Neuroscience with Matlab examples. Aim 1- Gain understanding of how to set up and solve ODE s

On computing differential transform of nonlinear non-autonomous functions and its applications

A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR SOLVING THE 1-D BURGERS EQUATION

Linear Response Theory: The connection between QFT and experiments

By HENRY H. KIM and KYU-HWAN LEE

A DECOMPOSITION METHOD FOR SOLVING DIFFUSION EQUATIONS VIA LOCAL FRACTIONAL TIME DERIVATIVE

An introduction to Support Vector Machine

Attribute Reduction Algorithm Based on Discernibility Matrix with Algebraic Method GAO Jing1,a, Ma Hui1, Han Zhidong2,b

On fuzzy normed algebras

Volatility Interpolation

A New Generalized Gronwall-Bellman Type Inequality

FI 3103 Quantum Physics

Li An-Ping. Beijing , P.R.China

Online Appendix for. Strategic safety stocks in supply chains with evolving forecasts

Variants of Pegasos. December 11, 2009

Lecture 11 SVM cont

THE PREDICTION OF COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT IN BUSINESS

STABILITY OF PEXIDERIZED QUADRATIC FUNCTIONAL EQUATION IN NON-ARCHIMEDEAN FUZZY NORMED SPASES

On complete system of invariants for the binary form of degree 7

Lecture 18: The Laplace Transform (See Sections and 14.7 in Boas)

2.1 Constitutive Theory

The Shapley value for fuzzy games on vague sets

Performance Analysis for a Network having Standby Redundant Unit with Waiting in Repair

Appendix H: Rarefaction and extrapolation of Hill numbers for incidence data

SELFSIMILAR PROCESSES WITH STATIONARY INCREMENTS IN THE SECOND WIENER CHAOS

Math 128b Project. Jude Yuen

Comb Filters. Comb Filters

FuzzyStacked Set and Fuzzy Stacked Semigroup

Advanced Machine Learning & Perception

M. Y. Adamu Mathematical Sciences Programme, AbubakarTafawaBalewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria

Department of Economics University of Toronto

Operations Research Letters

Optimal Investment under Relative Performance Concerns

TSS = SST + SSE An orthogonal partition of the total SS

2/20/2013. EE 101 Midterm 2 Review

Stochastic Programming handling CVAR in objective and constraint

Fuzzy Set Theory in Modeling Uncertainty Data. via Interpolation Rational Bezier Surface Function

3. OVERVIEW OF NUMERICAL METHODS

)-interval valued fuzzy ideals in BF-algebras. Some properties of (, ) -interval valued fuzzy ideals in BF-algebra, where

In the complete model, these slopes are ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR THE COMPLETE TWO-WAY MODEL. (! i+1 -! i ) + [(!") i+1,q - [(!

Double system parts optimization: static and dynamic model

Mechanics Physics 151

Chapter 2 Linear dynamic analysis of a structural system

Mechanics Physics 151

Certain Coding Theorems Based on Generalized Inaccuracy Measure of Order α and Type β and 1:1 Coding

Observer Design for Nonlinear Systems using Linear Approximations

Neutrosophic Relational Data Model

arxiv: v4 [math.pr] 30 Sep 2016

Density Matrix Description of NMR BCMB/CHEM 8190

TitleA random walk analogue of Levy's th. Studia scientiarum mathematicarum H Citation

Robustness Experiments with Two Variance Components

arxiv: v1 [cs.sy] 2 Sep 2014

Advanced Macroeconomics II: Exchange economy

Let s treat the problem of the response of a system to an applied external force. Again,

Lecture 2 M/G/1 queues. M/G/1-queue

Normal Random Variable and its discriminant functions

Chapter 6: AC Circuits

Transcription:

Annals of Fuzzy Mahemacs and Informacs Volume 8, No. 2, (Augus 2014), pp. 245 257 ISSN: 2093 9310 (prn verson) ISSN: 2287 6235 (elecronc verson) hp://www.afm.or.kr @FMI c Kyung Moon Sa Co. hp://www.kyungmoon.com Fne dmensonal nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear spaces T. Bag, S. K. Samana Receved 30 Sepember 2013; Revsed 13 January 2014; Acceped 21 January 2014 Absrac. In hs paper we consder general -norm n he defnon of fuzzy normed lnear space whch s nroduced by he auhors n an earler paper. I s proved ha f -norm s chosen oher han mn hen decomposon heorem of a fuzzy norm no a famly of crsp norms may no hold. We sudy some basc resuls on fne dmensonal fuzzy normed lnear spaces n general -norm seng. 2010 AMS Classfcaon: 54A40, 03E72 Keywords: Correspondng Auhor: Fuzzy norm, -norm, Fuzzy normed lnear space. Tarapada Bag (arapadavb@gmal.com) 1. Inroducon Theory of fuzzy ses was nroduced by Zadeh [19] n 1965. Afer he poneerng work of Zadeh, here has been a grea effor o oban fuzzy analogues of classcal heores. Among oher felds, a progressve developmens are made n he feld of fuzzy merc spaces and fuzzy normed lnear spaces [3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11]. The noon of nuonsc fuzzy se has been nroduced by Aanassov [1] as a generalzed fuzzy se. J.H.Park [14], who frs nroduced he dea of nuonsc fuzzy merc space and suded some basc properes. On he oher hand, Saada & Park [15] have an mporan conrbuon on he nuonsc fuzzy opologcal spaces. They have also nroduced he noon of nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space and suded some basc properes n such spaces. There have been a good amoun of work done n nuonsc fuzzy se such as T.K. Mandal & S.K.Samana [12, 13], N. Thllagovndan e al.[17]. Recenly Vjayabalaj e al.[18] nroduced a concep of nuonsc fuzzy n-normed lnear space and developed some resuls. T.K.Samana e al. [16] consdered a fuzzy normed lnear space whch was nroduced by Bag & Samana [2, 5] and defned an nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space n general seng ( akng and as -norm and -co-norm respecvely ). They manly suded dfferen resuls on fne dmensonal nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space. Bu her

resuls depend on he decomposon heorem of he nuonsc fuzzy norm no a famly of pars of crsp norms for whch hey have aken he addonal condons on -norm and -conorm as a a = a and a a = a a [0, 1] whch resuled =mn and a a=max. So effecvely he generaly of he -norm and -conorm are los. On he oher hand, because of he relaon M(x, ) + N(x, ) 1, some of he condons nvolvng he funcons M(x, ) and N(x, ) n he defnon consdered by T.K.Samana e al.[16] led o such a suaon ha n some defnons and resuls relaed o convergence and Cauchyness of a sequence saemens nvolvng one of he funcons M and N follows from he oher. To avod hese rvaly, n hs paper, we have modfed he defnon of nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space nroduced by R. Saada e al. [15] and sudy fne dmensonal nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space. In our defnon boh he condons vz. (1) a a = a, a a = a and (2) M(x, ) + N(x, ) 1 are waved. In our presen approach we have avoded he decomposon echnque whch s very much dependen on he resrced -norm vz. mn and -conorm vz. max. The organzaon of he paper s as n he followng: Secon 1 comprses some prelmnary resuls. In Secon 2, we nroduce a defnon of nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space. Some basc resuls on compleeness and compacness are esablshed n fne dmensonal nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear spaces n Secon 3. 2. Prelmnares Defnon 2.1 ([10]). A bnary operaon : [0, 1] [0, 1] [0, 1] s a -norm f sasfes he followng condons: (1) s assocave and commuave; (2) a 1 = a a [0, 1]; (3) a b c d whenever a c and b d for each a, b, c, d [0, 1]. If s connuous hen s called connuous -norm. Followng are examples of some -norms ha are frequenly used as fuzzy nersecons defned for all a, b [0, 1]. () Sandard nersecon: a b = mn(a, b). () Algebrac produc: a b = ab. () Bounded dfference: a b = max(0, a + b 1). (v) Drasc nersecon: a b = The relaons among hese -norms are a for b = 1 b for a = 1 0 for oherwse. a b(drasc) max(0, a + b 1) ab mn(a, b). Defnon 2.2 ([10]). A bnary operaon : [0, 1] [0, 1] [0, 1] s a -co-norm f sasfes he followng condons: (1) s assocave and commuave; (2) a 0 = a a [0, 1]; (3) a b c d whenever a c and b d for each a, b, c, d [0, 1]. 246

If s connuous hen s called connuous -co-norm. examples of -co-norms. () Sandard unon: a b = max(a, b). () Algebrac sum: a b = a + b ab. () Bounded sum : a b = mn(1, a + b). (v) Drasc unon: a for b = 0 a b = b for a = 0 1 for oherwse. Followng are some Relaons among hese -co-norms are a b (Drasc) mn(1, a + b) a + b ab max(a, b) Defnon 2.3 ([5]). Le U be a lnear space over he feld F (C or R). A fuzzy subse N of U R (R- se of real numbers) s called a fuzzy norm on U f (N1) R wh 0, N(x, ) = 0; (N2) ( R, > 0, N(x, ) = 1) ff x = 0; (N3) R, > 0, N(cx, ) = N(x, ) f c 0; (N4) s, R; x, u U; N(x + u, s + ) N(x, s) N(u, ); (N5) N(x,.) s a non-decreasng funcon of R and lm N(x, ) = 1. The par (U, N) wll be referred o as a fuzzy normed lnear space. In [2], parcular -norm mn s aken for. Defnon 2.4 ([15]). The 5-uple (V, µ, ν,, ) s sad o be an nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space f V s a vecor space, s connuous -norm, s a connuous -conorm and µ, ν are fuzzy ses on V (0, ) sasfyng he followng condons for every x, y V and s, > 0; (a) µ(x, ) + ν(x, ) 1; (b) µ(x, ) > 0; (c) µ(x, ) = 1 f and only f x = 0; (d) µ(cx, ) = µ(x, ) f c 0; (e) µ(x + u, s + ) µ(x, s) µ(u, ); (f) µ : (0, ) [0, 1] s connuous; (g) lm µ(x, ) = 1 and lm µ(x, ) = 0; 0 (h) ν(x, ) < 1; () ν(x, ) = 0 ff x = 0; (j) ν(cx, ) = ν(x, ) f c 0; (k) ν(x + u, s + ) ν(x, s) ν(u, ); (l) ν : (0, ) [0, 1] s connuous; (m) lm ν(x, ) = 0 and lm ν(x, ) = 1. 0 In hs case (µ, ν) s called an nuonsc fuzzy norm. T.K.Samana e al. [16] consder he above defnon by omng he condons (f) and (l) as n he followng. 247

Defnon 2.5 ([16]). Le be a connuous -norm, be a connuous -conorm and V be a lnear space over he feld F(R/C). An nuonsc fuzzy norm ( IFN ) on V s an objec of he form A = {((x, ), N(x, ), M(x, )) : (x, ) V R + } where N,M are fuzzy ses on V R +, N denoes he degree of membershp and M denoes he degree of non-membershp () N(x, ) + M(x, ) 1 (x, ) V R + ; () N(x, ) > 0; () N(x, ) = 1 f and only f x = 0; (v) N(cx, ) = N(x, ) f c 0, c F; (v) s, R + ; x, u V ; N(x + u, s + ) N(x, s) N(u, ); (v) N(x,.) s a non-decreasng funcon of R + and lm N(x, ) = 1; (v) M(x, ) > 0; (v) ( R, > 0, M(x, ) = 0) ff x = 0; (x) M(cx, ) = M(x, ) f c 0, c F; (x) s, R + ; x, u V ; M(x + u, s + ) M(x, s) M(u, ); (x) M(x,.) s a non-ncreasng funcon of R + and lm M(x, ) = 0. Then we say (V, A) s an nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space. Defnon 2.6 ([16]). A sequence {x n } n an IFNLS (V, A) s sad o converge o x V f gven r > 0, > 0, 0 < r < 1 here exss a posve neger n 0 such ha N(x n x, ) > 1 r and M(x n x, ) < r n n 0. Theorem 2.7 ([16]). In an IFNLS (V, A), a sequence {x n } converges o x ff lm N(x n x, ) = 1 and lm M(x n x, ) = 0. n n Theorem 2.8 ([16]). If a sequence {x n } n an IFNLS (V, A), s convergen, s lm s unque. Defnon 2.9 ([16]). A sequence {x n } n an IFNLS (V, A) s sad o be a Cauchy sequence f lm N(x n+p x n, ) = 1 and lm M(x n+p x n, ) = 0 unformly n n on p = 1, 2,..., > 0. Defnon 2.10 ([16]). Le (V, A) be an IFNLS. A subse P of V s sad o be closed f for any sequence {x n } n P converges o x P. Defnon 2.11 ([16]). Le (V, A) be an IFNLS and P V. Then he closure of P denoed by P, s defned by P = {x V : a sequence {x n } n P convergng o x}. Defnon 2.12 ([16] ). Le (V, A) be an IFNLS. A subse P of V s sad o be compac f any sequence {x n } n P has a subsequence whch converges o some elemen n P. 3. Inuonsc fuzzy normed lnear spaces Followng s our modfed defnon of nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space. 248

Defnon 3.1. Le be a -norm, be a -conorm and V be a lnear space over he feld F(R or C). An nuonsc fuzzy norm ( IFN ) on V s an objec of he form A = {((x, ), N(x, ), M(x, )) : (x, ) V R} where N,M are fuzzy ses on V R, N denoes he degree of membershp and M denoes he degree of non-membershp (x, ) V R sasfyng he followng condons: (IFN1) R wh 0, N(x, ) = 0; (IFN2) ( R, > 0, N(x, ) = 1) ff x = 0; (IFN3) R, > 0, N(cx, ) = N(x, (IFN4) s, R; x, u U; N(x + u, s + ) N(x, s) N(u, ); (IFN5) lm N(x, ) = 1. (IFN6) R wh 0, M(x, ) = 1; (IFN7) ( R, > 0, M(x, ) = 0) ff x = 0; ) f c 0; (IFN8) R, > 0, M(cx, ) = M(x, ) f c 0; (IFN9) s, R; x, u V ; M(x + u, s + ) M(x, s) M(u, ); (IFN10) lm M(x, ) = 0. Then we say (V, A) s an nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space. Remark 3.2. From (IFN2) and (IFN4), follows ha N(x,.) s a non-decreasng funcon of R. From (IFN7) and (IFN9), follows ha M(x,.) s a non-ncreasng funcon of R. Example 3.3. Le (V, ) be a normed lnear space. Defne wo fuzzy subses N and M :V R [0, 1] by N(x, ) = M(x, ) = { + x for > x 0 x { x x + for > x 1 for x Take a b = ab and a b = mn{1, a + b}. Then (V, A) s an nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space. Proof. All he condons excep (IFN4) and (IFN9) are easly verfed. Frs we verfy (IFN4);.e., N(x + y, s + ) N(x, s) N(y, ). Le x, y V and s, R. Suppose s, > 0 (Snce n oher cases (IFN4) s obvous). We have, s+ s++ x+y s+ = s++ x + y s s+ (s+ x )(+ y ) s++ x + y s s+ x +s y + x y s (s+ x )(+ y ) = s2 y +(s+) x y + 2 x A 0. where A = (s + + x + y )(s + x + s y + x y ). So N(x + u, s + ) N(x, s) N(u, ). Nex we verfy M(x + u, s + ) M(x, s) M(u, ). We only consder he case when s > x and > y (snce n oher cases (IFN9) 249

s obvous). We have, M(x, s) M(y, ) M(x + y, s + ) = x x +s + y y +s x+y x+y +s+ = [{ x ( + y ) + y (s + x )}{ x + y + s + } x + y (s + x )( + y )]/A where A = ( x + s)( + y ){ x + y + s + }. = [(s + ) x ( + y ) + (s + ) y (s + x ) + x x + y ( + y ) + x + y y (s + x ) x + y (s + x )( + y )]/A = [(s + ) x ( + y ) + (s + ) y (s + x ) + x x + y ( + y ) + x + y (s + x ){ y y }]/A. = [(s+) x (+ y )+(s+) y (s+ x )+ x+y ( x + x y s x )]/A. = [(s + ) x ( + y ) + (s + ) y (s + x ) + x y x + y s x + y ]/A. [(s + ) x ( + y ) + (s + ) y (s + x ) + x y x + y s x s y ]/A..e. M(x, s) M(y, ) M(x + y, s + ) 0..e. M(x, s) M(y, ) M(x + y, s + ). Noe 3.4. In he conex of modfed Defnon 3.1, we consder he same Defnon 2.6, Defnon 2.9, Defnon 2.10, Defnon 2.11, Defnon 2.12 and s easy o verfy ha he Theorem 2.7 and Theorem 2.8 are vald n respec of modfed defnon. 4. Fne dmensonal nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear spaces In hs secon we sudy compleeness and compacness properes of fne dmensonal nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear spaces. Frsly consder he followng Lemma whch plays he key role n sudyng properes of fne dmensonal nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear spaces. Lemma 4.1. Le (V, A) be an nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space wh he underlyng -norm connuous a (1, 1) and he underlyng -conorm connuous a (0, 0) and {x 1, x 2,..., x n } be a lnearly ndependen se of vecors n V. Then c 1, c 2 > 0 and δ 1, δ 2 (0, 1) such ha for any se of scalars {α 1, α 2,..., α n }; N(α 1 x 1 + α 2 x 2 +... + α n x n, c 1 M(α 1 x 1 + α 2 x 2 +... + α n x n, c 2 n n α j ) < 1 δ 1. (4.1.1a) α j ) > δ 2. (4.1.1b) Proof. Le s = α 1 + α 2 +... + α n. If s = 0 hen α j = 0 j = 1, 2,..., n and he relaon (4.1.1a) holds for any c > 0 and δ (0, 1). Nex we suppose ha s > 0. Then (4.1.1a) s equvalen o N(β 1 x 1 +β 2 x 2 +...+β n x n, c 1 ) < 1 δ 1 (4.1.2a) for some c 1 > 0 and δ 1 (0, 1), and for all scalars β s wh β j = 1. If possble suppose ha (4.1.2a) does no hold. Thus for each c > 0 and δ (0, 1), a se of scalars {β 1, β 2,..., β n } wh β j = 1 for whch N(β 1 x 1 + β 2 x 2 +... + β n x n, c) 1 δ. 250

Then for c = δ = 1 m, m = 1, 2,..., a se of scalars {β(m) 1, β (m) 2,..., β n (m) } wh 1 j = 1 such ha N(y m, m ) 1 1 m where y m = β (m) 1 x 1 + β (m) 2 x 2 +... + β (m) n x n. Snce j = 1, we have 0 j 1 for j = 1, 2,..., n. So for each fxed j he sequence {β (m) j } s bounded and hence {β (m) 1 } has a convergen subsequence. Le β 1 denoe he lm of ha subsequence and le {y 1,m } denoe he correspondng subsequence of {y m }. By he same argumen {y 1,m } has a subsequence {y 2,m } for whch he correspondng subsequence of scalars {β (m) 2 } converges o β 2 ( say ). Connung n hs way, afer n seps we oban a subsequence {y n,m } where y n,m = γ (m) j x j wh γ (m) j = 1 and γ (m) j β j as m. Le y = β 1 x 1 + β 2 x 2 +... + β n x n. Now we show ha lm N(y n,m y, ) = 1 > 0. We have N(y n,m y, ) = N( (γ (m) j β j }x j, ) So, N(x 1, n γ (m) )... N(x n, ). 1 β 1 n γ n (m) β n lm N(y n,m y, ) lm N(x 1, )... lm n γ (m) 1 β 1 N(x n, n γ n (m) β n ). lm N(y n,m y, ) 1... 1 ( by he connuy of -norm a (1, 1)). lm N(y n,m y, ) = 1 > 0 (4.1.3a). Now for k > 0, choose m such ha 1 m < k. 1 We have N(y n,m, k) = N(y n,m + 0, m + k 1 m ) N(y 1 n,m, m ) N(0, k 1 m ) (1 1 m ) N(0, k 1 m )..e. N(y n,m, k) (1 1 m ) N(0, k 1 m ) = (1 1 m ) 1 = 1 1 m )..e. lm N(y n,m, k) 1..e. lm N(y n,m, k) = 1. (4.1.4a) Now N(y, 2k) = N(y y n,m + y n,m, k + k) N(y y n,m, k) N(y n,m, k) N(y, 2k) lm N(y y n,m, k) lm N(y n,m, k) ( by he connuy of -norm a (1, 1)). N(y, 2k) 1 1 by (4.1.3a)&(4.1.4a) N(y, 2k) = 1 1 = 1. Snce k > 0 s arbrary, by (IFN2) follows ha y = 0. Agan snce j = 1 and {x 1, x 2,..., x n } are lnearly ndependen se of vecors, so y = β 1 x 1 + β 2 x 2 +... + β n x n 0. Thus we arrve a a conradcon. Now we prove he relaon (4.1.1b). If s = 0 hen α j = 0 j = 1, 2,..., n and he relaon (4.1.1b) holds for any c > 0 251

and δ (0, 1). Nex we suppose ha s > 0. Then (4.1.1b) s equvalen o M(β 1 x 1 +β 2 x 2 +...+β n x n, c 2 ) > δ 2 for some c 2 > 0 and δ 2 (0, 1), and for all scalars β j s wh β j = 1. (4.1.2b) If possble suppose ha (4.1.2b) does no hold. Thus for each c > 0 and δ (0, 1), a se of scalars {β 1, β 2,..., β n } wh β j = 1 for whch M(β 1 x 1 + β 2 x 2 +... + β n x n, c) δ. Then for c = δ = 1 m, m = 1, 2,..., a se of scalars {γ(m) 1, γ (m) 2,..., γ n (m) } wh γ (m) 1 j = 1 such ha M(z m, m ) 1 m where z m = γ (m) 1 x 1 + γ (m) 2 x 2 +... + γ (m) n x n. Snce γ (m) j = 1, we have 0 γ (m) j 1 for j = 1, 2,..., n. Then by same argumen as above, we oban a subsequence {z n,m } where z n,m = η (m) j x j wh η (m) j = 1 and η (m) j η j as m. Thus η j = 1 Le z = η 1 x 1 + η 2 x 2 +... + η n x n. Then we have lm M(z n,m z, ) = 0 > 0. (4.1.3b) Now for k > 0, choose m such ha 1 m < k. 1 We have M(z n,m, k) = M(z n,m + 0, m + k 1 m ) M(z 1 n,m, m ) M(0, k 1 m ) 1 m M(0, k 1 m )..e. M(z n,m, k) 1 m M(0, k 1 m ) = 1 m 0 = 1 m..e. lm M(z n,m, k) 0..e. lm M(z n,m, k) = 0. (4.1.4b) Now M(z, 2k) = M(z z n,m + z n,m, k + k) M(z z n,m, k) M(z n,m, k) M(z, 2k) lm M(z z n,m, k) lm M(z n,m, k) ( by he connuy of -conorm a (0, 0)). M(z, 2k) 0 0 by (4.1.3b)&(4.1.4b) M(z, 2k) = 0 0 = 0. Snce k > 0 s arbrary, by (IFN7) follows ha z = 0. Agan snce η (m) j = 1 and {x 1, x 2,..., x n } are lnearly ndependen se of vecors, so z = η 1 x 1 + η 2 x 2 +... + η n x n 0. Thus we arrve a a conradcon. Ths complees he lemma. 252

Theorem 4.2. Every fne dmensonal nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space (V, A) wh he connuy of he underlyng -norm a (1, 1) and -co-norm a (0, 0) s complee. Proof. Le (V, A) be an nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space and dmv =k (say ). Le {e 1, e 2,..., e k } be a bass for V and {x n } be a Cauchy sequence n V. Le x n = β (n) 1 e 1 + β (n) 2 e 2 +... + β (n) k e k where β (n) 1, β (n) 2,..., β (n) k are suable scalars. So lm N(x m x n, ) = 1 > 0 (4.2.1a) m,n and lm M(x m x n, ) = 0 > 0 (4.2.1b) m,n Now from Lemma 4.1, follows ha c 1, c 2 > 0 and δ 1, δ 2 (0, 1) such ha N( (β (m) β (n) )e, c 1 β (n) ) < 1 δ 1. (4.2.2a) M( (β (m) )e, c 2 ) > δ 2 (4.2.2b) Agan for 1 > δ 1 > 0, from (4.2.1a), follows ha a posve neger n 0 (δ 1, ) such ha, N( (β (m) β (n) )e, ) > 1 δ 1 m, n n 0 (δ 1, ). (4.2.3a) Now from (4.2.2a) and (4.2.3a), we have, N( (β (m) )e, ) > 1 δ 1 > N( β (n) ) m, n n 0 (δ 1, ) c 1 (β (m) )e, c 1 < m, n n 0 (δ 1, ) ( snce N(x,.) s nondecreasng n ). < c 1 m, n n 0 (δ 1, ) Snce > 0 s arbrary, from above we have, lm m,n β(m) < c 1 m, n n 0 (δ 1, ) and = 1, 2,..., k. = 0 for = 1, 2,..., k. {β (n) } s a Cauchy sequence of scalars for each = 1, 2,..., k. So each sequence {β (n) } converges. Le lm n β(n) = β for = 1, 2,..., k. and x = β e. Clearly x V Now > 0, N(x n x, ) = N( β (n) e k β (n) β e, ) = N( (β (n) β )e, )..e. N(x n x, ) N(e 1, ) N(e 2, )... 1 β 1 k β (n) 2 β 2... N(e k, ). (4.2.4a) k β (n) k β k 253

When n hen k β (n) β ( snce β(n) β ) for = 1, 2,..., k and > 0. From (4.2.4a) we ge, usng he connuy of -norm a (1, 1), lm N(x n x, ) 1 1... 1 > 0 n lm N(x n x, ) = 1 > 0. n Now from (4.2.2b) and (4.2.3b), we have, M( (β (m) β (n) )e, ) < δ 2 < M( m 0 (δ, ) c 2 (β (m) β (n) )e, c 2 (4.2.5a) β (n) ) m, n < m, n n 0 (δ 2, ) ( snce M(x,.) s non-ncreasng n ) < c 2 m, n n 0 (δ 2, ) < c 2 m, n n 0 (δ 2, ) and = 1, 2,..., k. Snce > 0 s arbrary, from above we have, lm m,n β(m) = 0 for = 1, 2,..., k. {β (n) } s a Cauchy sequence of scalars for each = 1, 2,..., k. So each sequence {β (n) } converges. Le lm n β(n) = β for = 1, 2,..., k. and x = β e. Clearly x V. Now > 0, M(x n x, ) = M( β (n) e k β (n) β e, ) = M( (β (n) β )e, )..e. M(x n x, ) M(e 1, ) M(e 2, )... 1 β 1 k β (n) 2 β 2... M(e k, ). (4.2.4b) k β (n) k β k When n hen k β (n) β ( snce β(n) β ) for = 1, 2,..., k and > 0. From (4.2.4b) we ge, usng he connuy of -co norm a (0, 0), lm M(x n x, ) 0 0... 0 > 0 n lm M(x n x, ) = 0 > 0. n (4.2.5b) From (4.2.5a) and (4.2.5b), we have x n x as n. Hence (V, A) s complee. Defnon 4.3. Le (V, A) be an nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space and F V. F s sad o be bounded f for each r, 0 < r < 1, 1, 2 > 0 such ha N(x, 1 ) > 1 r and M(x, 2 ) < r x F. Theorem 4.4. In a fne dmensonal nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space (V, A) n whch he underlyng -norm s connuous a (1, 1) and -co-norm s connuous a (0, 0), a subse F s compac ff s closed and bounded. Proof. Frs we suppose ha F s compac. We have o show ha F s closed and bounded. 254

Le x F. Then a sequence {x n } n F such ha lm x n = x. n Snce F s compac, a subsequence {x nk } of {x n } converges o a pon n F. Agan {x n } x so {x nk } x and hence x F. So F s closed. If possble suppose ha F s no bounded. Then r 0 wh 0 < r 0 < 1 such ha for each posve neger n, x n F such ha N(x n, n) 1 r 0 or M(x n, n) r 0. So here exss a subsequence of {x n } ( whou loss of generaly we assume {x n } o be ha subsequence ) for whch a leas one of he relaons N(x nk, n k ) 1 r 0 n N (4.4.1a) M(x nk, n k ) r 0 n N (4.4.1b) holds. Frs we assume ha (4.4.1a) holds. Now for > 0, 1 r 0 N(x nk, n k ) = N(x nk x + x, n k + ) where > 0 1 r 0 N(x nk x, ) N(x, n k ) 1 r 0 lm N(x n k x, ) lm N(x, n k ) k k 1 r 0 1 1 = 1 ( usng he connuy of -norm a (1, 1)) r 0 0 whch s a conradcon. In case (4.4.1b) holds, by consderng he funcon M(x, ), proceedng as above, we arrve a a conradcon. Hence F s bounded. Conversely suppose ha F s closed and bounded and we have o show ha F s compac. Le dm V=n and {e 1,, e 2,..., e n } be a bass for V. Choose a sequence {x k } n F and suppose x k = β (k) 1 e 1 + β (k),..., β(k) n are scalars. Now from Lemma 4.1, c 1, c 2 > 0 and δ 1, δ 2 (0, 1) such ha β (k) 1, β(k) 2 N( β (k) e, c 1 and M( β (k) e, c 2 2 e 2 +... + β n (k) e n where β (k) ) < 1 δ 1 (4.4.2a) β (k) ) > δ 2 (4.4.2b) Agan snce F s bounded, for δ 1 (0, 1), 1 > 0 such ha N(x, 1 ) > 1 δ 1 and 2 > 0 such ham(x, 2 ) < δ 1 x F. So N( β (k) e, 1 ) > 1 δ 1 (4.4.3a) and M( β (k) e, 2 ) < δ 1 (4.4.3b) From (4.4.2a) and (4.4.3a) we ge, N( β (k) e, c 1 β (k) ) < 1 δ 1 < N( β (k) e, 1 ) N( β (k) e, c 1 β (k) ) < N( 255 β (k) e, 1 )

c 1 n β (k) < 1 ( snce N(x,.) s non-decreasng ) β (k) 1 c1 for k = 1, 2,... and = 1, 2,..., n. So each sequence {β (k) } ( = 1, 2,..., n) s bounded. By repeaed applcaons of Bolzano-Weersrass heorem, follows ha each of he sequences {β (k) } has a convergen subsequence say {β k l }, = 1, 2,..., n. Le x kl = β (k l) 1 e 1 + β (k l) 2 e 2 +... + β (k l) n e n and {β (k l) 1 }, {β (k l) 2 },..., {β (k l) n } are all convergen. Le β = lm l β (k l), = 1, 2,..., n. and x = β 1 e 1 + β 2 e 2 +... + β n e n. Now for > 0 we have, N(x kl x, ) = N( n (βk l N(e 1, β )e, ) n β k l lm N(x kl x, ) 1 1... 1 (β k l l of -norm a (1, 1)) lm N(x kl x, ) = 1. l Now for > 0 we ge, M(x kl x, ) = M( n (βk l M(e 1, β1 )... N(e n, ) 1 n β k l n β n β as l ) ( usng he connuy n β k l β )e, ) β1 )... M(e n, 1 n β k l lm M(x kl x, ) 0 0... 0 (β k l l l and usng he connuy of -co-norm a (0, 0)) lm M(x kl x, ) = 0. l n β n ) β as l ) (snce β k l (4.4.4a) β as (4.4.4b) From (4.4.4a ) and (4.4.4b), follows ha x kl x. Thus x F (snce F s closed). Hence F s compac. Ths complees he proof. 5. Concluson In hs paper, he defnon of nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space (IFNLS) nroduced by T.K.Samana e al. s generalzed. In he new defnon of IFNLS, he underlyng -norm and -conorm are consdered n general seng n he sense ha only connuy of -norm and -conorm a (1, 1) and (0, 0) respecvely are used. We are able o esablsh some basc heorems n fne dmensonal IFNLS n hs seng and our approach s fundamenally dfferen because we have no used he decomposon heorem of nuonsc fuzzy norm whose valdy requre a srngen resrcon ha -norm s mn and -conorm s max. Also we have only use he mplc nuonsc properes among N(x, ) and M(x, ) funcons and skp he explc resrcon N(x, )+M(x, ) 1 for whch n several defnons nvolvng convergence, boundeness boh he funcons N(x, ) and M(x, ) have equal role. We hnk ha here s a scope of furher work n hs seng. Acknowledgemens. The auhors are graeful o he referees for her valuable suggesons n rewrng he paper n he presen form. The auhors are also hankful o he Edor-n-Chef of he journal ( AFMI ) for valuable commens whch help us o revse he paper. The presen work s parally suppored by Specal Asssance 256

Programme (SAP) of UGC, New Delh, Inda [Gran No. F. 510/4/DRS/2009 (SAP- I)]. References [1] K. Aanasov, Inuonsc fuzzy ses, Fuzzy Ses and Sysems 20 (1986) 87 96. [2] T. Bag and S. K. Samana, Fne dmensonal fuzzy normed lnear spaces, J. Fuzzy Mah. 11(3) (2003) 687 705. [3] T. Bag and S. K. Samana, Fuzzy bounded lnear operaors, Fuzzy Ses and Sysems 151 (2005) 513 547. [4] T. Bag and S. K. Samana, Fxed pon heorems on fuzzy normed lnear spaces, Inform. Sc. 176 (2006) 2910 2931. [5] T. Bag and S. K. Samana, Fne dmensonal fuzzy normed lnear spaces, Ann. Fuzzy Mah. Inform. 6(2) (2013) 271 283. [6] S. C. Cheng and J. N. Mordeson, Fuzzy lnear operaors and fuzzy normed lnear spaces, Bull. Calcua Mah. Soc. 86(5) (1994) 429 436. [7] C. Felbn, Fne dmensonal fuzzy normed lnear spaces, Fuzzy Ses and Sysems 48 (1992) 239 248. [8] O. Kaleva and S. Sekkala, On fuzzy merc spaces, Fuzzy Ses and Sysems 12 (1984) 215 229. [9] A. K. Kasaras, Fuzzy opologcal vecor spaces, Fuzzy Ses and Sysems 12 (1984) 143 154. [10] George. J. Klr and Bo Yuan, Fuzzy Ses and Fuzzy Logc, Prnce-Hall of Inda Prvae Lmed, New Delh-110001 (1997). [11] A. K. Kramosl and J. Mchalek, Fuzzy merc and sascal merc spaces, Kyberneka (Prague) 11(5) (1975) 336 344. [12] Tapas Kumar Mondal and S. K. Samana, Topology of nerval-valued nuonsc fuzzy ses, Fuzzy Ses and Sysems 119 (2001) 483 494. [13] Tapas Kumar Mondal and S. K. Samana, On nuonsc gradaon of openness, Fuzzy Ses and Sysems 131 (2002) 323 336. [14] J. H. Park, Inuonsc fuzzy mderc spaces, Chaos Solons Fracals 22 (2004) 1039 1046. [15] R. Saada and J. H. Park, On he nuonsc fuzzy opolgcal spaces, Chaos Solons Fracals 27 (2006) 331 344. [16] T. K. Samana and Iqbal H. Jebrl, Fne dmensonal nuonsc fuzzy normed lnear space, In. J. Open Probl. Compu. Sc. Mah. 2(4) (2009) 574 591. [17] N. Thllagovndan, S. Ana Shan and Y. B. Jun, On lacunary sascal convergence n nuonsc n-normed lnear spaces, Ann. Fuzzy Mah. Inform. 1(2) (2011) 119 131. [18] S. Vjayabalaj, N. Thllagovndan and Y. B. Jun, Inuonsc fuzzy n-normed lnear space, Bull. Korean Mah. Soc. 44 (2007) 291 308. [19] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Ses, Informaon and Conrol 8 (1965) 338 353. T. Bag (arapadavb@gmal.com) Deparmen of Mahemacs, Vsva-Bhara, Sannkean-731235, Wes Bengal, Inda Syamal Kumar Samana (syamal123@yahoo.co.n) Deparmen of Mahemacs, Vsva-Bhara, Sannkean-731235, Wes Bengal, Inda 257