International Construction Consulting, LLC

Similar documents
External Pressure... Thermal Expansion in un-restrained pipeline... The critical (buckling) pressure is calculated as follows:

Coating Requirements for Pipelines Installed by Horizontal Directional Drilling John D. Hair, P.E.*

Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

Technical Note PP TN Engineering Considerations for Temperature Change

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column:

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

Lab Exercise #5: Tension and Bending with Strain Gages

ATTACHMENT L. HDD Reports

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

Stress Transformation Equations: u = +135 (Fig. a) s x = 80 MPa s y = 0 t xy = 45 MPa. we obtain, cos u + t xy sin 2u. s x = s x + s y.

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

Guidelines for the Installation of SYGEF Pipes, Fittings and Valves

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

Mechanics of Materials Primer

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

2. Rigid bar ABC supports a weight of W = 50 kn. Bar ABC is pinned at A and supported at B by rod (1). What is the axial force in rod (1)?

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN

Solution: T, A1, A2, A3, L1, L2, L3, E1, E2, E3, P are known Five equations in five unknowns, F1, F2, F3, ua and va

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

S E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S

EFFECTIVENESS OF HYDROFRACTURE PREDICTION FOR HDD DESIGN

R13. II B. Tech I Semester Regular Examinations, Jan MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, AE, MTE) PART-A

Samantha Ramirez, MSE. Stress. The intensity of the internal force acting on a specific plane (area) passing through a point. F 2

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)

Please review the following statement: I certify that I have not given unauthorized aid nor have I received aid in the completion of this exam.

Horizontal Directional Drilling: An Approach to Design and Construction. Presenter: John Briand, PE Co-Author: Danielle Neamtu, PE

Strength of Material. Shear Strain. Dr. Attaullah Shah

BELT TENSIONS & HP RESULTS

EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2 Stress & Strain - Axial Loading

Serviceability Deflection calculation

N = Shear stress / Shear strain

3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF ARKANSAS TEST SERIES PILE #2 USING OPENSEES (WITH LPILE COMPARISON)

[5] Stress and Strain

Solution: The moment of inertia for the cross-section is: ANS: ANS: Problem 15.6 The material of the beam in Problem

Horizontal Directional Drill Feasibility Study. for the. Athabasca River Crossing

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:

I certify that I have not given unauthorized aid nor have I received aid in the completion of this exam.

IDE 110 Mechanics of Materials Spring 2006 Final Examination FOR GRADING ONLY

Lecture 15 Strain and stress in beams

Properties of Sections

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

Rigid pavement design

Entrance exam Master Course

GATE SOLUTIONS E N G I N E E R I N G

Symmetric Bending of Beams

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS

ABS Consulting Project No

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Experimental Investigation of Soil-Pipe Friction Coefficients for Thermoplastic Pipes Installed in Selected Geological Materials

ASME BPVC VIII Example E E4.3.8 PTB

PVP BUTANE STORAGE BULLET CALCULATION AND FEA VERIFICATION

CE6306 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS TWO MARK QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS ACADEMIC YEAR

Downloaded from Downloaded from / 1

Stress Analysis Lecture 3 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

Problem d d d B C E D. 0.8d. Additional lecturebook examples 29 ME 323

[7] Torsion. [7.1] Torsion. [7.2] Statically Indeterminate Torsion. [7] Torsion Page 1 of 21

Effect Of Material Nonlinearity On Submarine Pipeline During Laying

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS

INTRODUCTION TO STRAIN

Mechanics of Materials

AXIAL FORCE IN PULLED-INTO-PLACE HDPE PIPES DURING AND AFTER INSTALLATION

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. Preliminary Qualifying Examination Solid Mechanics February 25, 2002

The science of elasticity

COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)

Dynamic Earth Pressure Problems and Retaining Walls. Behavior of Retaining Walls During Earthquakes. Soil Dynamics week # 12

If the solution does not follow a logical thought process, it will be assumed in error.

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

EMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 4 Pure Bending Homework Answers

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

NORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.

Task 1 - Material Testing of Bionax Pipe and Joints

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200

ACET 406 Mid-Term Exam B

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

Calculating the Risk of Structural Failure

PES Institute of Technology

8/11/14. Sheet 1. Colonial Flag 9390 So 300 West Sandy, UT

BENCHMARK LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE USING OPENSEES & COMPARISON WITH ANALYTICAL SOLUTION

Steel Cross Sections. Structural Steel Design

SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA

Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING )

A UNIQUE PIPELINE FAULT CROSSING DESIGN FOR A HIGHLY FOCUSED FAULT

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Lesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18

Solid Mechanics Homework Answers

Calculations. Conceptual Cofferdam. Prepared for. LAN - Austin. August Briarpark Drive Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77042

Experimental Investigation of Steel Pipe Pile to Concrete Cap Connections

Transcription:

International Construction Consulting, LLC HDD Design, Calculations, and Cost Estimate Bow Tie to Industrial Park; Soyo, Angola www.oil-gas-consulting.com

JOB No: NA PREPRD.BY: G Lamberson DATE: 16-Jan-18 SUBJECT: HDD General Calculations; Length & Angle & General Design Analysis; Cost Estimate Input Parameters Diameter (in.) = 24.000 Wall Thickness (in.) = 0.500 SMYS (psi) = 65,000 Type of Service = Gas Design Pressure = 1,440 Safety Factor = 0.72 Installation Temperature (degrees F) = 90.00 Ground Temperature (degrees F) = 60.00 Operating Temperature (degrees F) = 80.00 Cover on Bottom (Ft) = 10.00 Groundwater table head (feet) = 10.00 Groundwater Table Elevation = 15.38 Concrete Coated Pipe = No Concrete Coating Thickness (inches) = 0.00 Concrete Compressive Strength (PSI) = 0 Depth of Pipe relative to entry/exit at Lowest Point = 35.00 Horizontal Length of Drill (Ft) = 1,918.00 Key Calculated Values D/t ratio = 48.00 r o (in.) = 12 Results of this preliminary Technical Evaluation = for positive compressive forces, N = 0, i.e., no push or pull r i (in.) = 11.5 E (psi) = 3.05E+07 Young's modulus for steel (see calculation sheet ) I (in 4 ) = 2549.351198 Moment of interia, = PI/4*(r 4 o - r 4 i ) R (in.) = 16,631 Radius of curvature in inches Deflection Angle = 0.0009 Radians/15 Feet Deflection Angle = 0.0517 Degress/15 Feet Deflection Angle = 0.0902 %/15 Feet M = (in-lb) = 4,670,570 M = EI/R A = (in 2 ) = 36.914 Cross sect. area = PI*(D - t)*t W = (in 3 ) = 216.868 (elastic) section modulus = PI/4*(D - t) 2 *t Calculated R.O.C. = 1,386 Feet (average of calculation methods) Top Bank at Entry of X-ing (Elev in Ft) = 0.000 Ft Top Bank at Exit of X-ing (Elev in Ft) = 0.000 Ft Bottom of X-ing (Elev in Ft) = -25.000 Ft Entry Angle, Deg 12.000 Deg Entry Elevation, ft 16.00 Ft Minimum Depth Elevation, ft 35.00 Ft Horizontal Dist. @ Depth, ft 1,639.70 Ft Exit Angle, Deg. 10.000 Deg Exit Elevation, ft 0.00 Ft Minimum Radius, ft 1,385.93 Ft Entry Point to PC -231.87 Ft PC to PT 288.15 Ft PT to PC 1,639.70 Ft PC to PT 240.66 Ft PT to Exit Point -317.91 Ft Length of Bore - Total Entry to Exit 1,923 Ft Maximum Pullback Force 224,841 Lbs Maximum Pullback Force 1,000 kn General Longitudinal Stresses (Sigma x ) N Sigma x (psi) = Sigma x + Sigma M x = N/A + M/W where Sigma x N = 0 Sigma x N = N/A This preliminary design has been evaluated and is deemed acceptable subject to a full design review. Length, Angles, & Misc Input and Calculations and Sigma x M = 21,536 Sigma x M = M/W 1/16/2018 HDD Stress Analysis & Results HDD Full Pipe & Installation Stress Analysis Rev 2.xlsm

JOB No: NA PREPRD.BY: G Lamberson DATE: 16-Jan-18 SUBJECT: HDD General Calculations; Length & Angle & General Design Analysis; Cost Estimate Critical Longitudinal Stresses (Sigma xcr ) when N acts alone, i.e., M = 0 and p = 0 Sigma xcr N (psi) = 63,180.0000 Sigma x N = Sigma F *[1-.001*(D/t)-20)] N ~ axial for 20 < D/t < 100 when M acts alone, i.e., N = 0 and p = 0 Sigma xcr M (psi) = 73,710.0000 Sigma x M = Sigma F *(1.35-0.0045*D/t) M ~ bending Given by: Sigma y = (p e - p i ) x D / (2 x t) where p e (psi) = 18.2 p e = external pressure = 0.052*W m *H W m (lbs) = 10 W m = weight of mud, lbs./gal. H (ft.) = 35.00 H = feet of head (depth of burial) p i (psi) = 0 p i = internal pressure (assumed) Sigma y (psi) = 436.80 conversion factor, 0.052 converts #/gal to psi/ft. Critical Hoop Stress, (Sigma ycr ) when p acts alone, i.e., N = 0 and M = 0 Sigma ycr (psi) = 13,793.22 Sigma ycr = Sigma ye = E*(t / (D-t)) 2 ALPHA DETERMINATION: Nu xp is the permissible value of Sigma x /Sigma xcr, when Sigma y = 0 Nu yp is the permissible value of Sigma y /Sigma ycr, when Sigma x = 0 BEST CASE WORST CASE General Hoop Stress (Sigma y ) for Sigma ye < 2/3 Sigma F 2 /3 Sigma F (psi) = 43,333.33 OK Alpha = 1.20 Alpha = 1 + 300/(D/t)*Sigma y /Sigma ycr Permissible Usage Factors, (Nu xp and Nu yp ) Nu xp = 1.00 Nu yp = 0.98 Zone 1, loading Installation, loading Nu xp = 0.72 Nu yp = 0.62 Permissible Combination Of Sigma x and Sigma y (Sigma x /Nu xp *Sigma xcr ) alpha + (Sigma y /Nu yp *Sigma ycr ) < 1 BEST CASE WORST CASE 0.261341478 OK 0.390539865 OK Longitudinal Stress from Bending = 21,985 psi % SMYS = 33.8% Hoop Stress = 34,456 psi % SMYS = 53.0% Longitudinal Compressive Stress from Hoop Stress = 10,337 psi % SMYS = 15.9% Longitudinal Stress from Thermal Expansion = 1,981 psi % SMYS = 3.0% Net Longitudinal Compressive Stress = (9,667) psi % SMYS = 14.9% Maximum Shear Stress = 22,062 psi % SMYS = 33.9% Installation Design Results = OK Installation Stress Analysis Hoop stress limited by design factor from 49 CFR Part 192.111. (72% for Class 1, 60% for Class 2) Shear stress limited to 45% of SMYS by 402.3.1 of ASME/ANSI B31.4 1/16/2018 HDD Stress Analysis & Results HDD Full Pipe & Installation Stress Analysis Rev 2.xlsm

JOB No: NA PREPRD.BY: G Lamberson DATE: 16-Jan-18 SHEET: SUBJECT: Minimum Free Stress Radius of Curvature for Steel Pipe Pipe Parameters Minimum Radius of Curvature (Ft) for Steel Pipe Hoop Stress Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Pipe OD WT ID MAOP SMYS F E T Pressure Pipeline Texas Gas Transmission Method Grade or Rating Temperature Method of JD Rules of Quantum McDermott MOP 195 & 195 & 192 at 72.% of Pipe psi Stress on Concrete Coating (psi) Hair Thumb Equation Equation 192 192 only SMYS Pipe Method Best Case Worst Case Inches Inches Inches psig psi psig F Note 1 Note 1 Note 1 Note 2 Notes 2 & 3 Note 4 Note 5 API 5L X-65 24.000 0.500 23.000 1,440 65,000 0.72 1.00 1.00 1,950 60 34,560 2,400 ft 977 ft 1,538 ft 1,032 ft 982 ft 0 psi 0 psi Case 1: per JD Hair; Radius = f(od) Construction Temperature 90 F Case 2: per PipeLine Rules of Thumb Handbook Method, 2nd Ed; Radius = f ( OD,SMYS,F,ID,Es ) Minimum Ground Temperature 60 F Case 3: per Quantum Equation; Radius = f ( OD,SMYS ) Case 4: per McDermott Equation; Radius = f ( OD,SMYS,F,MAOP,WT,Es ) Concrete Parameters Case 5: per TGT Method; Radius = f ( OD,SMYS,F,ID,MAOP,WT,Es,Temp. ) Thickness 0.00 inches Concrete: Per TGT Method: Compressive Strength 0 psi Ccs (Best) T & C = f (Ec,(OD/2+WTc),Radius) Tensile Strength (*) 0 psi = 7 x (Ccs^½) (Worst) T = f(smys,f,ec,(od/2+wt),es,od) Modulus of Elasticity (*) 0.00E+00 psi = 57000 x (Ccs^½) Note 1: This case does not allow for stress due to internal pressure. Note 2: This case allows for stress due to internal pressure. Note 3: If MAOP/MOP = 0 then pipe is assumed to be casing. Note 4: The calculated quantity is the tension and compression (in psi). Best case assumes free relative motion between concrete inner surface and pipe outer surface. Note 5: The calculated quantity is the tension (in psi). Worst case assumes no relative motion between concrete inner surface and pipe outer surface. This case does not take radius of curvature into account as the interaction between the pipe and concrete is the worst case. 1/16/2018 Radius of Curvature HDD Full Pipe & Installation Stress Analysis Rev 2.xlsm

JOB No: NA PREPRD.BY: G Lamberson DATE: 28-Dec-17 SUBJECT: HDD General Calculations; Length & Angle & General Design Analysis; Cost Estimate GENERAL DATA PIPE WEIGHT DATA Pipe Diameter: 24.000 Inches Pipe Weight in Air: 125.49 Lb/ft Wall Thickness: 0.500 Inches Pipe Interior Vol.: 2.88524742 cu.ft/ft SMYS: 65,000 Psi Pipe Exterior Vol.: 3.14159265 cu.ft/ft Young's Modulus: 30.469E+06 Psi Air Line Weight: 0 Lb/ft Total Pipe Length: 2,326 ft Air Line Diameter: 0 Inches Moment of Inertia: 2548.199797 Inches^4 Air Line Ext. Vol.: 0.000 cu.ft/ft Pipe Face Surface Area: 36.91371368 Inches^2 Weight of Water: 0 Lb/ft Diameter/wall thickness ratio: 48 Displaced Mud Weight: 279.601746 Lb/ft Poisson's ratio for Steel: 0.3 Water density Mud Weight: 89.00 Lb/cu.ft Enter 0 for no buoyancy control: 0.00 Lb/cu.ft Coefficient of Soil Friction.: 0.30 Effective Wt. of pipe: -154.111746 Lb/ft Fluid Drag Coefficient.: 0.05 Psi Note: positive value indicates downward force ANALYSIS OF LOADS FOR STRAIGHT SECTION PULLED DOWNSLOPE Measured Length: 121.28 ft Axial Tension limited by RP2A-WSD Angle of Inclination: 12 degrees Comparison: 402 Psi < 58,500 = 0.20943951 radians Longitudinal Bending limited by RP2A-WSD Comparison: 0 Psi < 42,940 Drag Forces from Mud: 5,487 Lb Friction from Soil: 5,485 Lb External Hoop Stress limited by RP2A-WSD Effective Weight of Pipe: (3,886) Lb Comparison: 374 Psi < 7,758 Combined Stresses, Tensile & Bending, limited by RP2A-WSD PULL LOAD AT POINT B Comparison: 0.00688017 < 1 Tension on section: 14,857 Lb Cumulative Force exerted: 14,857 Lb Combined Stresses, Tensile, Bending & Hoop limited by RP2A-WSD Comparison: 0.00246128 < 1 ANALYSIS OF LOADS FOR CURVILINEAR SECTION PULLED DOWNSLOPE Measured Length: 241.8897082 ft Axial Tension limited by RP2A-WSD Change in Inclination Angle: 10 degrees Comparison: 1,308 Psi < 58,500 = 0.174532925 radians Radius of Curvature: 1386 ft Longitudinal Bending limited by RP2A-WSD Center Displacement: 5.273866619 ft Comparison: 21,985 Psi < 42,940 Assumed Average Tension: 4,191 Lb External Hoop Stress limited by RP2A-WSD Comparison: 687 Psi < 7,758 Normal Force: 32,076 Lb Drag Forces from Mud: 10,943 Lb Combined Stresses, Tensile & Bending, limited by RP2A-WSD Friction from Soil: 19,246 Lb Comparison: 0.53435705 < 1 Effective Weight of Pipe: (3,249) Lb Combined Stresses, Tensile, Bending & Hoop limited by RP2A-WSD PULL LOAD AT POINT C Comparison: 0.22605637 < 1 Tension on section: 33,438 Lb Average Tension: 31,576 Lb Cumulative Force exerted: 48,295 Lb ANALYSIS OF LOADS FOR HORIZONTAL STRAIGHT SECTION Measured Length: 1,558.43 ft Axial Tension limited by RP2A-WSD Angle of Inclination: 0 degrees Comparison: 5,170 Psi < 58,500 = 0 radians Longitudinal Bending limited by RP2A-WSD Comparison: 0 Psi < 42,940 Drag Forces from Mud: 70,502 Lb Friction from Soil: 72,052 Lb External Hoop Stress limited by RP2A-WSD Effective Weight of Pipe: 0 Lb Comparison: 730 Psi < 7,758 Combined Stresses, Tensile & Bending, limited by RP2A-WSD PULL LOAD AT POINT D Comparison: 0.08837802 < 1 Tension on section: 142,553 Lb Cumulative Force exerted: 190,848 Lb Combined Stresses, Tensile, Bending & Hoop limited by RP2A-WSD Comparison: 0.02261897 < 1 1/16/2018 Pulling Forces HDD Full Pipe & Installation Stress Analysis Rev 2.xlsm

JOB No: NA PREPRD.BY: G Lamberson DATE: 28-Dec-17 SUBJECT: HDD General Calculations; Length & Angle & General Design Analysis; Cost Estimate ANALYSIS OF LOADS FOR CURVILINEAR SECTION PULLED UPSLOPE Measured Length: 241.8897082 ft Axial Tension limited by RP2A-WSD Change in Incl. Angle: 10 degrees Comparison: 5,810 Psi < 58,500 = 0.174532925 radians Radius of Curvature: 1,386 ft Longitudinal Bending limited by RP2A-WSD Center Displacement: 5.273866619 ft Comparison: 21,985 Psi < 42,940 Assumed Average Tension: 8,713 Lb External Hoop Stress limited by RP2A-WSD Comparison: 418 Psi < 7,758 Normal Force: 26,534 Lb Drag Forces from Mud: 10,943 Lb Combined Stresses, Tensile & Bending, limited by RP2A-WSD Friction from Soil: 15,921 Lb Comparison: 0.61130595 < 1 Effective Weight of Pipe: (3,249) Lb Combined Stresses, Tensile, Bending & Hoop limited by RP2A-WSD PULL LOAD AT POINT E Comparison: 0.30145671 < 1 Tension on section: 23,614 Lb Average Tension: 202,655 Lb Cumulative Force exerted: 214,462 Lb ANALYSIS OF LOADS FOR STRAIGHT SECTION PULLED UPSLOPE Length of Section: 162.14 ft Axial Tension limited by RP2A-WSD Angle of Inclination: 10 degrees Comparison: 6,091 Psi < 58,500 = 0.174532925 radians Longitudinal Bending limited by RP2A-WSD Comparison: 0 Psi < 42,940 Drag Forces from Mud: 7,335 Lb Friction from Soil: 7,382 Lb External Hoop Stress limited by RP2A-WSD Effective Weight of Pipe: (4,339) Lb Comparison: 0 Psi < 7,758 Combined Stresses, Tensile & Bending, limited by RP2A-WSD PULL LOAD AT POINT F Comparison: 0.10411927 < 1 Tension on section: 10,378 Lb Cumulative Force exerted: 224,841 Lb Combined Stresses, Tensile, Bending & Hoop limited by RP2A-WSD Comparison: 0.01372042 < 1 RESULTS Total Pulling Force: 224,841 Lb Stress Violations: 0 The pulling force analysis performed indicate the design is adequate. 1/16/2018 Pulling Forces HDD Full Pipe & Installation Stress Analysis Rev 2.xlsm

JOB No: NA * PREPRD.BY: G Lamberson DATE: 16-Jan-18 SHEET: SUBJECT: HDD Installation Stress Analysis GENERAL DATA Pipe Diameter (inches): 24.00 Wall Thickness (inches): 0.500 SMYS (psi): 65,000 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure (psi): 1,440 Poisson's ratio: 0.30 Young's Modulus: 3.0E+07 Radius of Curvature (feet): 1,386 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (inches/inch/degree F): 6.5E-06 Installation Temperature (degrees F) = 90 Ground Temperature (degrees F) = 60 Operating Temperature (degrees F) = 80 Cover on Bottom (Ft) = 10 Groundwater table head (feet) = 10 HDD INSTALLATION STRESS ANALYSIS Longitudinal Stress from Bending = 21,985 psi % SMYS = 33.8% Hoop Stress = 34,456 psi Hoop stress limited by design % SMYS = 53.0% factor from 49 CFR Part 192.111. (72% for Class 1, 60% for Class 2) Longitudinal Compressive Stress from Hoop Stress = 10,337 psi % SMYS = 15.9% Longitudinal Stress from Thermal Expansion = 1,981 psi % SMYS = 3.0% Net Longitudinal Compressive Stress = (9,667) psi % SMYS = 14.9% Maximum Shear Stress = 22,062 psi Shear stress limited to 45% of % SMYS = 33.9% SMYS by 402.3.1 of ASME/ANSI B31.4 Installation Design Results = OK 1/16/2018 Installation Stress Analysis HDD Full Pipe & Installation Stress Analysis Rev 2.xlsm

JOB No: NA PREPRD.BY: G Lamberson 16-Jan-18 SUBJECT: HDD Operational Stress Analysis GENERAL DATA Pipe Diameter: 24.000 Inches Wall Thickness: 0.500 Inches SMYS: 65,000 psi Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure 1,440 psi Poisson's ratio: 0.3 Young's Modulus: 3.047E+07 Psi Radius of Curvature: 1,386 feet Coefficient of Thermal Expansion: 6.5E-06 inches/inch/ F Installation Temperature: 90.00 F Operating Temperature: 80.00 F Groundwater Table Depth Relative to Entry Point: -10.00 feet Groundwater Table Elevation: 15.38 feet Depth of Pipe relative to entry/exit at Lowest Point: -35 feet Groundwater Table Head: 25 feet Longitudinal Stress from Bending = 21,985 Allowable Stress per B31.4 = SMYS x F x E x T = Sa = 25,200 psi % SMYS = 33.8% % SMYS = 38.8% Longitudinal Stress from Thermal Expansion = 1,981 % SMYS = 3.0% DATA ANALYSIS PER METHOD OF JD HAIR Hoop Stress = 34,300 Hoop Stress limited by design factor from 49 CFR Part 192 or 195. % SMYS = 52.8% Net Longitudinal Compressive Stress = -9,714 Additive Longitudinal Stress Limit = 0.75 x Sa = 18,900 psi % SMYS = 14.9% % SMYS = 29.1% Maximum Shear Stress = 22,007 Shear stress limited to 45% of SMYS by 402.3.1 of ASME/ANSI B31.4 % SMYS = 33.9% Based on the above calculations, the Operational Stress Analysis is Satisfactory 1/16/2018 Operational Stress Analysis HDD Full Pipe & Installation Stress Analysis Rev 2.xlsm

Modulus of Elasticity (psi x 10^6) Modulus of Elasticity (psi x 10^6) JOB No: NA PREPRD.BY: G Lamberson DATE: 16-Jan-18 SUBJECT: HDD - Modulus of Elasticity Calaculations Reference Temperature = 60.00 F Modulus of Elasticity = 30.469 ksi = 30.469E+06 psi The data below is calculated based on Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, 6th Edition Carbon Steels with Carbon Material: Content: above 0.30 percent (0.3%) Modulus of Elasticity (ksi) at Temperature ( F) -325 F -200 F -100 F 70 F 200 F 300 F 400 F 500 F 600 F 700 F 800 F 900 F 1,000 F 1,100 F 1,200 F 31 30.6 30.4 29.9 29.5 29.0 28.3 27.4 26.7 25.4 23.8 21.5 18.8 15.0 11.2 31.0 30.5 30.469 30.0 29.5 29.0-20 F -10 F 0 F 10 F 20 F 30 F 40 F 50 F 60 F 70 F 80 F 90 F 100 F 110 F 120 F Normal Temperature Range for Steel Pipe ( F) 34 32 30.469 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10-300 F -200 F -100 F 0 F 100 F 200 F 300 F 400 F 500 F 600 F 700 F 800 F 900 F 1,000 F 1,100 F 1,200 F Temperature ( F) 1/16/2018 Modulus of Elasticity HDD Full Pipe & Installation Stress Analysis Rev 2.xlsm

JOB No: NA PREPRD.BY: G Lamberson DATE: 16-Jan-18 SUBJECT: HDD Profile Details Horizontal Length Point of Entry 1918.0 ft. Point of Exit Grade 25.8 ft. 121.3 ft. 162.1 ft. 28.6 ft. Drill Data 118.6 ft. 159.7 ft. Top Bank at Entry = 0.00 ft MSL 44.4 ft. 36.9 ft. Top Bank at Exit = 0.00 ft MSL 9.2 ft. 6.4 ft. Bottom of X-ing = -25.00 ft MSL Cover on Bottom = 10.0 ft. 12 deg 10 deg Total Depth = 35.0 ft. 43.4 ft. 44.4 ft. 1558.4 ft. 36.9 ft. 36.4 ft. Entry Side - Curve Data Exit Side - Curve Data Radius = 982.00 ft Total Length of Pipe - Entry to Exit Radius = 982 ft Angle = 12 deg 1923.1 ft. Angle = 10 deg Length = 165.63 ft Length = 199.06 ft. Tangent = 44.35 ft Tangent = 36.92 ft. 1/16/2018 Profile HDD Full Pipe & Installation Stress Analysis Rev 2.xlsm

JOB No: CLIENT: PROJECT: SUBJECT: Pipe Diameter 24.000 Pipe Wall Thickness 0.500 Pipe Grade 65,000 Hours per Shift 12 Length of Drill 1,923 Feet Mobe/Demobe Costs $ 150,000 Each Type of Soil Gravel Pilot Hole Production Rate 55 Feet/Hr Drilling Mud Flow Rate 5 BPM Pilot Hole Duration 2.91 Shifts Circulation Loss 50% Pilot Hole Mud Qty 315 Sacks Pre-Ream Passes 3 Ea Pre-Ream Travel Speed 2.5 Feet/Min Pre-Ream Mud Flow Rate 10 BPM Pre-Ream Duration 1.07 Shifts Circulation loss 50% Pre-Reaming Mud Qty 692 Sacks Pull Back Travel Speed 8 Feet/Min Pull Back Mud Flow Rate 10 BPM Pull Back Duration 0.33 Shifts Circulation Loss 50% Pull Back Mud Quantity 72 Mud Cost $ 125.00 Mobilization Time 30 Days Time Required to Drill 12 Days Total Time from Contract 42 Days NA DATE: 16-Jan-18 Sonangol Gas Natural PREPRD.BY: G Lamberson 24" Gas Pipeline from Bow Tie to Industrial Park-Soyo, Angola HDD Cost Estimate HDD Cost Estimate Activities Time Labor Equipment Misc Totals Mobilization $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Rig Up 4 $ 60,000 $ 100,000 $ 161,019 Pilot Hole 2.91 $ 43,707 $ 72,845 $ 117,570 Ream 1.07 $ 16,026 $ 26,710 $ 43,752 Pull Back 0.33 $ 5,008 $ 8,347 $ 14,370 Rig Down 4 $ 60,000 $ 100,000 $ 161,019 Demobilization $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Drilling Mud $ 144,725 $ 144,725 Sub Total Cost $ 942,456 Risk Premium 30% $ 282,737 Profit 20% $ 245,038 Total Cost $ 1,470,231 Cost/Ft $ 127.42 1/16/2018 Cost Estimate HDD Full Pipe & Installation Stress Analysis Rev 2.xlsm