Practical Lattice Design

Similar documents
LECTURE 7. insertion MATCH POINTS. Lattice design: insertions and matching

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Lattice Design II: Insertions Bernhard Holzer, DESY

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

Operational Experience with HERA

HE-LHC Optics Development

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Collider Rings and IR Design for MEIC

Longitudinal Dynamics

The Luminosity Upgrade at RHIC. G. Robert-Demolaize, Brookhaven National Laboratory

DYNAMIC APERTURE STUDIES FOR HL-LHC V1.0 *

Introduction to particle accelerators

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

Transverse Beam Dynamics II

LIS section meeting. PS2 design status. Y. Papaphilippou. April 30 th, 2007

Optimization of the SIS100 Lattice and a Dedicated Collimation System for Ionisation Losses

PUBLICATION. Consolidated EIR design baseline: Milestone M3.6

Overview of LHC Accelerator

New LSS optics for the LHC (status)

A Luminosity Leveling Method for LHC Luminosity Upgrade using an Early Separation Scheme

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

e + e Factories M. Sullivan Presented at the Particle Accelerator Conference June 25-29, 2007 in Albuquerque, New Mexico e+e- Factories

Introduction to Transverse Beam Dynamics

Main aim: Preparation for high bunch intensity operation with β*=3.5 m and crossing angle (-100 µrad in IR1 and +100 µrad in IR5)

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

Modeling CESR-c. D. Rubin. July 22, 2005 Modeling 1

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Pretzel scheme of CEPC

ILC Beam Dynamics Studies Using PLACET

TeV Scale Muon RLA Complex Large Emittance MC Scenario

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

LHC Commissioning in 2008

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Beam-Beam DA Simulations for HL-LHC

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

SPPC Study and R&D Planning. Jingyu Tang for the SPPC study group IAS Program for High Energy Physics January 18-21, 2016, HKUST

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

Putting it all together

Emittance preservation in TESLA

Lattice Design II: Insertions Bernhard Holzer, CERN

LHC commissioning. 22nd June Mike Lamont LHC commissioning - CMS 1

Gianluigi Arduini CERN - Beams Dept. - Accelerator & Beam Physics Group

Luminosity Goals, Critical Parameters

E. Wilson - CERN. Components of a synchrotron. Dipole Bending Magnet. Magnetic rigidity. Bending Magnet. Weak focusing - gutter. Transverse ellipse

Accelerator Physics. Accelerator Development

Beam Loss Monitors, Specification

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

Beam losses versus BLM locations at the LHC

Class Review. Content

RING-RING DESIGN. Miriam Fitterer, CERN - KIT for the LHeC study group

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

Turn-by-Turn Beam Position Measurements at ANKA with LIBERA ELECTRON

FCC-hh Final-Focus for Flat-Beams: Parameters and Energy Deposition Studies

The Electron-Ion Collider

Particle Accelerators: Transverse Beam Dynamics

LHC. Construction Understanding first the commissioning. Prospects for

Low Emittance Machines

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

COMBINER RING LATTICE

The LHC. Part 1. Corsi di Dottorato Corso di Fisica delle Alte Energie Maggio 2014 Per Grafstrom CERN and University of Bologna

Effect of Insertion Devices. Effect of IDs on beam dynamics

Challenges of the Beam Delivery System for the future Linear Colliders

USPAS Accelerator Physics 2017 University of California, Davis

Lattice Design in Particle Accelerators

LHC Collimation and Loss Locations

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

The optimization for the conceptual design of a 300 MeV proton synchrotron *

Plans for CESR (or Life Without CLEO)

Introduction to Accelerators

III. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education

Beam. RF antenna. RF cable

Transverse dynamics. Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory

Interface with Experimental Detector in the High Luminosity Run

Conceptual design of an accumulator ring for the Diamond II upgrade

HiLumi LHC FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study. Deliverable Report SIMULATION MODELS FOR ENERGY DEPOSITION

Introduction to accelerators for teachers (Korean program) Mariusz Sapiński CERN, Beams Department August 9 th, 2012

FFAG diagnostics and challenges

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

LHC operation in 2015 and prospects for the future

The HL-LHC Accelerator Physics Challenges

OVERVIEW OF THE LHEC DESIGN STUDY AT CERN

LHC accelerator status and prospects. Frédérick Bordry Higgs Hunting nd September Paris

Practical Lattice Design

Simulations of HL halo loss and IR losses. R. Bruce, F. Cerutti, R. de Maria, A. Marsili, S. Redaelli

2 Closed Orbit Distortions A dipole kick j at position j produces a closed orbit displacement u i at position i given by q i j u i = 2 sin Q cos(j i ;

Linear Imperfections Oliver Bruning / CERN AP ABP

An Introduction to Particle Accelerators. v short

Nick Walker (for WG3) Snowmass, 2001

Preliminary design study of JUICE. Joint Universities International Circular Electronsynchrotron

Minimum emittance superbend lattices?

FACET-II Design Update

LHC Upgrade Plan and Ideas - scenarios & constraints from the machine side

Luminosity for the 100 TeV collider

Beam beam simulation. S.Isaacman, A.Long,E.Pueschel, D.Rubin. October 1,

PIP-II Injector Test s Low Energy Beam Transport: Commissioning and Selected Measurements

Transcription:

Practical Lattice Design Dario Pellegrini (CERN) dario.pellegrini@cern.ch USPAS January, 15-19, 2018 1/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

Lecture 5. Low Beta Insertions 2/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

Insertions Insertions are interruptions of the normal periodicity of the lattice, which allow to accomplish specific optics requirements for special elements and instruments. We can have insertions for all kinds of scopes, acting on both the machine geometry and the optics. We saw already the dispersion suppressor, an insertion that creates a region of vanishing (or smaller) dispersion useful for: RF cavities (why?) Reducing the beam size, remember: σ 2 = βε + (Dδ) 2 Undulator magnets (see tomorrow) Today: low beta insertions! 3/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

Why Low Beta? When delivering a particle beam to a target, the number of events per second can be written as: dr dt = Lσ p were σ p is the cross section of a specific process and L is the luminosity. If we have two colliding beams we can write the luminosity as: L = N 1N 2 f rev N b 4πσ x σ y For a given machine size and energy, f rev, the revolution frequency, is fixed. If we want to push the luminosity we can take: 1. the intensity route, acting on the number of bunches N b and on the number of particles in the two colliding bunches, N 1 N 2. 2. the beam size route, making σ x σ y as small as possible by having low emittances and low beta. 4/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

How big can an insertion be? At the LHC there are 46 m of empty space! 5/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

How hard can it be? These 46 m cost more than 1 km of optics manipulations! 6/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

The most problematic insertion: the drift space Let s see what happens to the Twiss parameters α, β, and γ if we stop focusing for a while β α γ = C 2 CC C 2 2SC SC + S C 2S C S 2 SS S 2 β α γ s 0 for a drift: M drift = ( C S C S ) = ( 1 s 0 1 ) β (s) = β 0 2α 0 s + γ 0 s 2 α (s) = α 0 γ 0 s γ (s) = γ 0 7/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

Let s find the location of the waist: α = 0 the location of the point of smallest beam size, β Beam waist: α (s) = α 0 γ 0s = 0 s = α0 γ 0 Beam size at that point } γ (l) = γ 0 α (l) = 0 γ (l) = 1 + α2 (l) β (l) This beta, at l = l waist, is also called beta star : = 1 β (l) = l waist β min = 1 γ 0 β = β min It s at l = l waist that the interaction point (IP) is located. 8/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

A drift space with L = l waist : the Low β-insertion We can assume we have a symmetry point at a distance l waist : β (s) = β 0 2α 0s + γ 0s 2, at α (s) = 0 β = 1 γ 0 On each side of the symmetry point we have β grows quadratically with s. β (s) = β + s2 β A drift space at the interaction point, with length L = l waist, is called low-β insertion : 9/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

Phase advance in a low-β insertion We have: β (s) = β + s2 β The phase advance across the straight section is: µ = Lwaist L waist ds β + s2 β which is close to µ = π for L waist β. = 2 arctan L waist β In other words: in the interaction region the tune increases by half an integer! 10/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

Crossing angle At the LHC the bunch spacing can go as small as 25 ns or 7.5 m. Therefore the beams need to be separated to avoid unwanted collision. However introducing a crossing angle also reduces the bunch overlap, with impact on the luminosity: L Xing = LS; S = 1 ( σ 1 + z σ x tan θ 2 The minimum separation between the two beams is determined by the mutual perturbation due to the long range encounters. 11/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design ) 2

Combining low-β and beam separation: a big headache! Both dipoles and quadrupoles need to be close to the IP, not always integrable into the detector. 12/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

Reference orbit and closed orbit The beams, that normally are in two separated pipes, are brought on the same reference orbit by the separating dipoles, D1 and D2. The triplet is centered on the reference orbit (same for both beams). Orbit correctors are used to create orbit bumps (horizontal or vertical) to separate the beams. The closed orbit differs from the reference orbit. Bumps are not only for the crossing angle, but also for IP shifts. These are used when the relative beam positions need to be scanned (e.g. to find collisions), or to compensate for ground motion, keeping the collision spot at the center of the detector. 13/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

Some Guidelines 1. Calculate the periodic solution in the arc 2. Start from the IP, introduce the drift space needed for the insertion device (detector...) 3. Install a quadrupole triplet (or doublet?) fix the aperture requirements and the achievable field gradient 4. Set the desired beta*, drive the triplet at high field, so that the beam is focused back 5. Introduce additional quadrupoles to match the beam parameters to the values at the beginning of the arc Parameters to be optimized & matched to the periodic solution: β x α x D x µ x β y α y D y µ y (D is normally accepted at the IP) 8 (at least) individually powered quad magnets are needed to match the insertion 14/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

2 in 1 Synchrotron and Collider While it may look natural to have the same machine performing both the acceleration and the collisions for physics, this is not without additional complications! The beam size shrinks significantly during the acceleration from 450 GeV to 7000 GeV (remember ε n = γ rel ε is constant), this means that at injection energy it will not be possible to accommodate low β. We need a dedicated optics for injection, which will be modified after reaching top energy and/or during the energy ramp. To achieve the β squeeze, many match points for a fine granularity of β values are computed, making sure that the magnetic strengths vary in a smooth way between them. 15/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

Pushing even further: telescopic squeeze One should avoid flipping the polarity of the magnets, always maintaining some strengths in them in order to avoid uncertainties from the hysteresis cycle. At the LHC although the triplet aperture would allow for smaller β, one runs out of steam due to the limited length of the matching sections and the available strength. The solution comes from freezing the matching section and let the β mismatch propagate along the arc (remember: at top energy we have extra aperture gained during the acceleration), fixing the optics on the other side of the arc. With a proper phase advance per cell (eg. 90 deg or 120 deg) the arc periodicity is anyway restored after few cells. Exercise: show that the transfer matrix of 4 FODO cells tuned at 90 deg is the identity matrix. 16/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design

Designing the IR: not just optics! The IR has to accomodate a number of devices: Quadrupoles and dipoles for the beam squeeze and separation Higher order magnets and correctors to compensate for field errors Instrumentation (BPM) and kickers for orbit control and correction Absorbers for the debris coming from the IP, important to limit the irradiation of components and/or the background to the experiments Collimators for the protection of the triplet in case of failure of some machine component external to the IR For more info: LHC Design Report, CERN-2004-003 17/17 D. Pellegrini - Practical Lattice Design