Double system parts optimization: static and dynamic model

Similar documents
Chapter 2. Models, Censoring, and Likelihood for Failure-Time Data

T L. t=1. Proof of Lemma 1. Using the marginal cost accounting in Equation(4) and standard arguments. t )+Π RB. t )+K 1(Q RB

Reliability of Technical Systems

Asymptotic Equipartition Property - Seminar 3, part 1

Rainbow saturation and graph capacities

Random Walk with Anti-Correlated Steps

20. Applications of the Genetic-Drift Model

Operators related to the Jacobi setting, for all admissible parameter values

Two Coupled Oscillators / Normal Modes

STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN TIME SERIES OF THE EXCHANGE RATES BETWEEN YEN-DOLLAR AND YEN-EURO IN

Math 10B: Mock Mid II. April 13, 2016

5. Stochastic processes (1)

23.2. Representing Periodic Functions by Fourier Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Matlab and Python programming: how to get started

Stochastic models and their distributions

Errata (1 st Edition)

SOLUTIONS TO ECE 3084

Solutions for Assignment 2

Matrix Versions of Some Refinements of the Arithmetic-Geometric Mean Inequality

Vehicle Arrival Models : Headway

Some Ramsey results for the n-cube

Robust estimation based on the first- and third-moment restrictions of the power transformation model

Basic notions of probability theory (Part 2)

Introduction to Probability and Statistics Slides 4 Chapter 4

Reading from Young & Freedman: For this topic, read sections 25.4 & 25.5, the introduction to chapter 26 and sections 26.1 to 26.2 & 26.4.

dy dx = xey (a) y(0) = 2 (b) y(1) = 2.5 SOLUTION: See next page

!!"#"$%&#'()!"#&'(*%)+,&',-)./0)1-*23)

4 Two movies, together, run for 3 hours. One movie runs 12 minutes longer than the other. How long is each movie?

in Engineering Prof. Dr. Michael Havbro Faber ETH Zurich, Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

Biol. 356 Lab 8. Mortality, Recruitment, and Migration Rates

Diebold, Chapter 7. Francis X. Diebold, Elements of Forecasting, 4th Edition (Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning, 2006). Chapter 7. Characterizing Cycles

Math From Scratch Lesson 34: Isolating Variables

ON THE BEAT PHENOMENON IN COUPLED SYSTEMS

Lecture 2-1 Kinematics in One Dimension Displacement, Velocity and Acceleration Everything in the world is moving. Nothing stays still.

INDEX. Transient analysis 1 Initial Conditions 1

Innova Junior College H2 Mathematics JC2 Preliminary Examinations Paper 2 Solutions 0 (*)

Electrical and current self-induction

Chapter 15: Phenomena. Chapter 15 Chemical Kinetics. Reaction Rates. Reaction Rates R P. Reaction Rates. Rate Laws

Continuous Time Markov Chain (Markov Process)

TMA 4265 Stochastic Processes

Families with no matchings of size s

Demodulation of Digitally Modulated Signals

ACE 562 Fall Lecture 8: The Simple Linear Regression Model: R 2, Reporting the Results and Prediction. by Professor Scott H.

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn Supplementary Figure 1. Spike-count autocorrelations in time.

Bias in Conditional and Unconditional Fixed Effects Logit Estimation: a Correction * Tom Coupé

State-Space Models. Initialization, Estimation and Smoothing of the Kalman Filter

Online Appendix for "Customer Recognition in. Experience versus Inspection Good Markets"

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN McCombs School of Business

Inventory Control of Perishable Items in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain

CENTRALIZED VERSUS DECENTRALIZED PRODUCTION PLANNING IN SUPPLY CHAINS

Problem Set 5. Graduate Macro II, Spring 2017 The University of Notre Dame Professor Sims

FINM 6900 Finance Theory

Let us start with a two dimensional case. We consider a vector ( x,

Guest Lectures for Dr. MacFarlane s EE3350 Part Deux

Navneet Saini, Mayank Goyal, Vishal Bansal (2013); Term Project AML310; Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

An Inventory Model for Time Dependent Weibull Deterioration with Partial Backlogging

Solutions to Odd Number Exercises in Chapter 6

Approximation Algorithms for Unique Games via Orthogonal Separators

Chapter 3 Common Families of Distributions

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Applying Genetic Algorithms for Inventory Lot-Sizing Problem with Supplier Selection under Storage Capacity Constraints

Lecture Notes 2. The Hilbert Space Approach to Time Series

The Contradiction within Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration

Lecture 2 April 04, 2018

A problem related to Bárány Grünbaum conjecture

11!Hí MATHEMATICS : ERDŐS AND ULAM PROC. N. A. S. of decomposiion, properly speaking) conradics he possibiliy of defining a counably addiive real-valu

Solutions to the Olympiad Cayley Paper

Christos Papadimitriou & Luca Trevisan November 22, 2016

Most Probable Phase Portraits of Stochastic Differential Equations and Its Numerical Simulation

2.7. Some common engineering functions. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Mathematical Theory and Modeling ISSN (Paper) ISSN (Online) Vol 3, No.3, 2013

KEY. Math 334 Midterm I Fall 2008 sections 001 and 003 Instructor: Scott Glasgow

Stationary Distribution. Design and Analysis of Algorithms Andrei Bulatov

Homework 4 (Stats 620, Winter 2017) Due Tuesday Feb 14, in class Questions are derived from problems in Stochastic Processes by S. Ross.

The expectation value of the field operator.

Explaining Total Factor Productivity. Ulrich Kohli University of Geneva December 2015

On a Discrete-In-Time Order Level Inventory Model for Items with Random Deterioration

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 10, October ISSN

APPENDIX AVAILABLE ON THE HEI WEB SITE

Final Spring 2007

Essential Microeconomics : OPTIMAL CONTROL 1. Consider the following class of optimization problems

Chapter 6. Systems of First Order Linear Differential Equations

Economics 8105 Macroeconomic Theory Recitation 6

ERROR LOCATING CODES AND EXTENDED HAMMING CODE. Pankaj Kumar Das. 1. Introduction and preliminaries

- If one knows that a magnetic field has a symmetry, one may calculate the magnitude of B by use of Ampere s law: The integral of scalar product

Basic definitions and relations

INTRODUCTION TO MACHINE LEARNING 3RD EDITION

EECE251. Circuit Analysis I. Set 4: Capacitors, Inductors, and First-Order Linear Circuits

Seminar 4: Hotelling 2

Oscillation of an Euler Cauchy Dynamic Equation S. Huff, G. Olumolode, N. Pennington, and A. Peterson

Linear Response Theory: The connection between QFT and experiments

Shiva Akhtarian MSc Student, Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Payame Noor University, Iran

Homework Solution Set # 3. Thursday, September 22, Textbook: Claude Cohen Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Franck Lalo, Second Volume Complement G X

Application Note AN Software release of SemiSel version 3.1. New semiconductor available. Temperature ripple at low inverter output frequencies

04. Kinetics of a second order reaction

Transform Techniques. Moment Generating Function

Logic in computer science

Y 0.4Y 0.45Y Y to a proper ARMA specification.

Inventory Analysis and Management. Multi-Period Stochastic Models: Optimality of (s, S) Policy for K-Convex Objective Functions

HOTELLING LOCATION MODEL

Transcription:

Double sysem pars opmizaon: sac and dynamic model 1 Inroducon Jan Pelikán 1, Jiří Henzler 2 Absrac. A proposed opmizaon model deals wih he problem of reserves for he funconal componens-pars of mechanism in order o increase is reliabiliy. he following facors are aken ino consideraon: he probabiliy of he failure-free run of a par wihou a reserve, he probabiliy of he failure-free run of a par wih a reserve, he mean value of losses caused by he par s malfuncon wihou a reserve, he mean value of losses caused by he par s malfuncon wih a reserve, coss of he purchase and mainenance of he reserve for he given pars. he values of hese pars failure probabilies are supposed o be known in advance, he losses caused by his failure are esmaed. Sascal independence of he failures of hose pars is supposed. In he model, he coss of he pars doubling are supposed o be limied o a fixed value. As a resul of he problem soluon, he pars of he model are sored ino wo groups: he pars which are o be doubled and he pars which are no. he sac model as well as he dynamic one, in which he failures are considered as Poisson evens are described, including numerical examples. Keywords: doubling of sysem pars, opmizaon model, probabiliy of failure, mean value of losses, sysem reliabiliy, sac and dynamic model. JEL classificaon: C44 AMS classificaon: 90C15 Complex mechanisms are composed of a grea number of componens. Each of he pars is responsible for he righ funconing of he whole sysem and vice versa, each par s failure can disurb he sysem or compleely pu i ou of operaon and cause damages in is effec. One of he ways of eliminang or a leas diminishing hese damages is doubling of some imporan pars. Having hese pars doubled, here is a possibiliy o exchange immediaely a non-funconal par by a funconal one (or in oher words, he failure is reduced only o a necessary me of a swich-over). On he oher side here are coss of doubling, primarily he price of a doubled par. For ha reason no all of he pars can be doubled, especially he expensive ones and also hose whose failure is no bringing so expensive damages. 2 Double sysem pars opmizaon model If we wan o know which pars are o be doubled, he following opmizaon model can be used. Firs we inroduce he presumpon of he model. Le us suppose n pars of he sysem (aggregaes, componens) Z 1,Z 2,...,Z n. Each of hese pars is characerized by: p i and p i probabilies of he failure-free run of Z i wihou and a wih reserve, q i and q i he mean value of losses caused by Z i s disorders wihou and wih a reserve, 1 Universiy of Economics Prague, Deparemen of Economerics, nám W. Churchilla 4, 130 67, Praha 3, Czech Republic, pelikan@vse.cz 2 Universiy of Economics Prague, Deparemen of Mahemacs, Ekonomická 957, 148 00, Praha 4, Czech Republic, henzler@vse.cz - 686 -

c i coss of he purchase and mainenance of he reserve for Z i. Nex we suppose: a sascal independence of he failures of hose pars, he coss of he pars doubling are limied o he amoun K. Le us inroduce 0-1 variables x 1,x 2,...,x n, he variable x i involves he decision beween he doubling of Z i (x i = 1) or no (x i = 0), see [3]. oal coss of he reserves for he pars are n c i x i and since he resources for reserves are limied by K, so i has o be valid n c i x i K. (1) On ha condions we can: a) maximize he reliabiliy of he sysem, ha is failure-free run, b) minimize he mean value of he sum of losses caused by he par s disorders. In he case a) he probabiliy of he failure-free sae of he sysem is he produc of he probabilies of he failure-free saes of all he pars. he par Z i will be failure-free wih he probabiliy p i, if i has a reserve (x i = 1). If he par Z i is wihou reserve (x i = 0) hen he failure-free probabiliy is p i. Alogeher he probabiliy of he par Z i s failure-free sae can be pu in he form p i + (p i p i )x i (see [1]). Hence he oal probabiliy of he failure-free sae expresses he whole sysem s reliabiliy: n r(x) = [p i + (p i p i )x i ]. (2) Afer logarihming he funcon r(x) in order o make he objecve funcon linear we ge he objecve funcon in he form n log r(x) = log[p i + (p i p i )x i ]. (3) Since he expression log[p i + (p i p i )x i ] for x i = 0 equals log(p i ) and for x i = 1 equals log(p i ), we can wrie he expression log[p i + (p i p i )x i ] in he form (1 x i )log(p i ) + x i log(p i ) : n n n log r(x) = [(1 x i )log(p i ) + x i log(p i )] = log(p i ) + x i log(p i /p i ) (4) he maximum reliabiliy model is as follows: n log r(x) = [log(p i ) + x i log(p i /p i )], n c i x i K, x i {0,1}, i = 1,2,...,n. (5) In he case b) he mean value of he losses caused by he par Z i s failure is wihou he reserve q i and wih he reserve q i. he mean value of he oal losses is as follows: n n z(x) = [(1 x i )q i + x i q i ] = [q i x i q i ], where q i = q i q i. (6) he minimal losses model is as follows: n z(x) = [q i x i q i ] min, n c i x i K, x i {0,1}, i = 1,2,...,n. (7) - 687 -

3 wo models Now, wo models can be disnguished. he firs one is a one-case siuaon, when he funcon operaes for a shor period - sac case. he second one is a long-me model for a longer me period - dynamic model. 3.1 Sac model he probabiliy of he componens failure Z i will be denoed as π i. Consequenly he probabiliy of he failure-free run of he par wihou a reserve is p i = 1 π i and he probabiliy of he failure-free run of he par wih a reserve is p i = 1 π 2 i. Le he loss caused by one failure of he par Z i be denoed by Q i ; hen he mean value of he loss is q i = π i Q i in case when here is no reserve, q i = π 2 i Q i in case when here is a reserve for he par Z i. Example 1. Le us have pars Z 1,Z 2,Z 3,Z 4,Z 5. Main characeriscs of hose pars are conained in able 1. he coss of he pars doubling are limied by he amoun K = 100. Z 1 Z 2 Z 3 Z 4 Z 5 p i 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.93 0.91 π i = 1 p i 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.07 0.09 πi 2 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.0049 0.0081 p i = 1 πi 2 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.9951 0.9919 c i 80 30 35 50 20 Q i 1666 250 333 1613 989 q i = Q i π i 166 50 33 113 89 q i = Q i πi 2 16.6 10 3.3 8 8 q i = q i q i 150 40 30 105 81 able 1 Characeriscs of he sac model Reliabiliy model which maximizes he failure-free probabiliy is: log(r(x)) = log(0.548402) + x 1 log(0.99/0.9) + x 2 log(0.96/0.8) + (8) +x 3 log(0.99/0.9) + x 4 log(0.9951/0.93) + x 5 log(0.91/0.9919) max, 80x 1 + 30x 2 + 35x 3 + 50x 4 + 20x 5 100, x 1,x 2,x 3,x 4,x 5 {0,1}. (9) By using sandard sofware LINGO we ge he opmal soluon x = (0,1,1,0,1) wih he failure-free probabiliy equal 0.789041, which is maximal. From he resul follows ha i has o double Z 2,Z 3,Z 5. Model which minimizes he mean value of he oal losses is: z(x) = 451.9 150x 1 40x 2 30x 3 105x 4 81x 5 min, (10) 80x 1 + 30x 2 + 35x 3 + 50x 4 + 20x 5 100, x 1,x 2,x 3,x 4,x 5 {0,1}. (11) When we use again LINGO sysem, we ge he opmal soluon x = (1,0,0,0,1) wih he minimal value of losses 220.9 in he mean value. According o his soluon only he pars Z 1 and Z 5 will be doubled. he differences in he soluons obained above we can explain by grea influence of he amoun of he loss in he opmal soluon in he second model. Firs soluon x = (0,1,1,0,1) means he mos reliable sysem, bu he loss is no minimal. Second soluon x = (1,0,0,0,1) gives us less reliable sysem, bu he loss is minimal. We can observe he values of reliabiliy, mean loss and coss of reserves for differen soluons in he able 2. he values wih a bulle are opmal for K = 100. - 688 -

soluon x reliabiliy losses doubling cos (0,0,0,0,0) 0.578402 451.9 0 (0,1,1,0,1) 0.789041 300.3 85 (1,0,0,0,1) 0.657534 220.6 100 (1,1,1,1,1) 0.934507 45.9 215 able 2 Sac model - differen soluons 3.2 Dynamic model Le us suppose ha he sysem s reliabiliy should be opmized wihin a period < 0, > and he periods beween he failures of he pars are exponenally disribued. Le he mean value of he period beween wo failures of he componen Z i be 1/λ i. he period of replacing he failed componen Z i by a new one has he fixed lengh i (see Figure 1). If he Z i is wihou a reserve, hen he probabiliy of he failure-free run due he par Z i is p i = exp( λ i ). (12) As he number of he failures wihin he period < 0, > is Poisson disribued wih he mean value λ i, he mean value of he loss caused by he par Z i in he case x i = 0 is equal o q i = λ i Q i, where he Q i is he loss caused by one failure of he par Z i. (13) Z i failure-free run 0 u 1 u 2 Figure 1 wo failures, u 1, u 2, in he sysem wihou a reserve par In case ha componen Z i has a reserve (x i = 1), he i is period necessary for he reserve componens exchange, where i << (see Figure 2). During he period i he failure-free probabiliy of he sysem (i.e. no failure of he reserve par) is exp( λ i i ), see [2]. Z i reserve 0 failure-free run u u u 1 2 3 Figure 2 Failures in sysem wih a reserve par As he failures of a par are reaed as Poisson evens and herefore independen, he probabiliy of failure-free run of he sysem in case of k failures of he par Z i or is reserve is (exp( λ i i )) k = exp( kλ i i ). (14) herefore, he overall probabiliy of failure-free run of he sysem consisng of he par Z i wih a reserve in he period < 0, > is as follows - 689 -

p i = exp( λ i ) i k=0 (λ i ) k exp( kλ i i ) = exp( λ i ) i k=0 (λ i exp( λ i i )) k where [ i ], i << is he op number of failures in he period < 0, >, exp( λ i ) (λi)k is he probabiliy of k failures of he par Z i or is reserve, exp(λ i [exp( λ i i ) 1]), (15) Le us find he logarihm of he reliabiliy funcon r(x); using he general formula (5) and supposing i << we have + n x i log i k=0 log r(x) = n log(p i ) + n x i log(p i /p i ) = (λ i ) k exp( kλ i i ) n λ i + n ( λ i ) + (16) n x i λ i exp( λ i i ). he mean value of he number of sysem failures due o he componen Z i s, i.e. q i can be esablished in he following way. he number of failures boh in he par Z i and is reserve is Poisson disribued. he me beween he wo failures is exponenally disribued wih parameer λ i. he sysem fails if he me inerval beween he failures of he par Z i and is reserve (or vice versa) is shorer hen he repair inerval i. he probabiliy of his even is equal 1 exp( λ i i ). Le he number of failures of he par Z i in he inerval < 0, > be k. hese failures can be aken as binomial evens, wih one oucome failure of he reserve of Z i wihin inerval i, i.e. sysem failure and oher oucome no such failure wihin i. hen probabiliy P(X i = r), where X i is he number of sysem failures due o Z i and is reserve, is as follows: i k=r [ P(X i = r) = i ] k=r ( k )(1 exp( λ i i )) r (exp( λ i i )) k r (λ i) k exp( λ i ) = r = (1 exp( λ i i )) r (λ i ) r exp( λ i ) r! i i k=r (λ i ) k r (k r)! exp( (k r)λ i i ), (17) E(X i ) = r P(X i = r) = (1 exp( λ i i ))λ i exp( λ i ) (1 exp( λ i i )) r 1 (λ i ) r 1 (r 1)! (λ i ) k r (k r)! r=0 exp( (k r)λ i i ) = (1 exp( λ i i ))λ i exp( λ i ) i r=1 [ ] 1 i s=0 (λ i ) s (1 exp( λ i i ))λ i, s! q i = E(X i ) Q i = (1 exp( λ i i ))λ i Q i. (18) Example 2. Le us have pars Z 1,Z 2,Z 3,Z 4,Z 5 (see able 3 for characeriscs; values of c i and Q i are he same as in he sac example). Le he overall me be = 5 [in hours]. he coss of he pars doubling are limied by he amoun K = 100. Reliabiliy model which maximizes he failure-free probabiliy is: n n n log(r(x)) = log(p i ) + x i log(p i /p i )] λ i + n x i λ i exp( λ i i ) = (19) = 8.5 + x 1 1.921579 + x 2 1.446960 + +x 3 1.701680 + x 4 2.160696 + x 5 0.978240 max, - 690 -

Z 1 Z 2 Z 3 Z 4 Z 5 λ i 0.4 0.3 0.35 0.45 0.2 i [in hours] 0.1 0.12 0.08 0.09 0.11 p i 0.135335 0.223130 0.173774 0.105399 0.367879 p i 0.924574 0.948342 0.952828 0.914567 0.978475 log(p i /p i ) 1.921579 1.446960 1.701680 2.160696 0.978240 c i 80 30 35 50 20 Q i 1666 250 333 1613 989 q i 3332 375 582.75 3629.25 989 q i 130.649 13.2599 16.0907 144.048 21.5204 q i = q i q i 3201.35 361.740 566.659 3485.20 967.480 able 3 Characeriscs of he dynamic model 80x 1 + 30x 2 + 35x 3 + 50x 4 + 20x 5 100, x 1,x 2,x 3,x 4,x 5 {0,1}. (20) By using LINGO sofware we ge he opmal soluon x = (0, 1, 0, 1, 1) wih he failure-free probabiliy equal 0,019958, which is maximal. From he resul follows ha i has o double Z 2,Z 4,Z 5. Model which minimizes he mean value of he oal losses is: z(x) = 8908 3201.35x 1 361.740x 2 566.659x 3 3485.20x 4 967.480x 5 min, (21) 80x 1 + 30x 2 + 35x 3 + 50x 4 + 20x 5 100, x 1,x 2,x 3,x 4,x 5 {0,1}. (22) By LINGO we ge we ge he opmal soluon x = (0,1,0,1,1) wih he minimum loss equal 4093.580. In conrary o he sac model, in he dynamic model he opmal soluon on respec o boh maximum reliabiliy and minimum loss is he same (see able 4 for differen soluons). soluon x reliabiliy losses doubling cos (0,0,0,0,0) 0.000203 8908 0 (0,1,0,1,1) 0.019958 4093.580 100 (1,1,1,1,1) 0.252368 325.571 215 able 4 Dynamic model - differen soluons Acknowledgemens his research was suppored by GAČR gran No. GACR P403/12/1947 and he projec F4/18/2011 founded by he Inernal Gran Agency of he Universiy of Economics, Prague. References [1] Černý, M.: Binary Segmenon and Bonferroni-ype Bounds, Kyberneka 47 (2011), No. 1, 38 49. ISSN 0023-5954. [2] Dupač, V.: Privae communicaon. [3] Nemhauser, G. L., Wolsey, L. A.: Ineger and Combinaorical Opmizaon. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1988. - 691 -