Theory of mean motion resonances.

Similar documents
Dynamical properties of the Solar System. Second Kepler s Law. Dynamics of planetary orbits. ν: true anomaly

Resonance Capture. Alice Quillen. University of Rochester. Isaac Newton Institute Dec 2009

Resonance In the Solar System

Dynamic Exoplanets. Alexander James Mustill

Tides and Lagrange Points

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 15. Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

EVOLUTIONS OF SMALL BODIES IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM

A STUDY OF CLOSE ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN MARS AND ASTEROIDS FROM THE 3:1 RESONANCE. Érica C. Nogueira, Othon C. Winter

Mean-Motion Resonance and Formation of Kirkwood Gaps

Astronomy 241: Review Questions #2 Distributed: November 7, 2013

Planetary system dynamics. Planetary migration Kozai resonance Apsidal resonance and secular theories Mean motion resonances Gravitational scattering

What is it like? When did it form? How did it form. The Solar System. Fall, 2005 Astronomy 110 1

Orbital Evolution in Extra-solar systems

F. Marzari, Dept. Physics, Padova Univ. Planetary migration

The dynamics of Plutinos

Hamiltonian Lecture notes Part 3

ORBITAL RESONANCES IN PLANETARY SYSTEMS 1

Moon Obs #1 Due! Moon visible: early morning through afternoon. 6 more due June 13 th. 15 total due June 25 th. Final Report Due June 28th

Resonancias orbitales

The asteroids. Example for the usage of the Virtual Observatory

Kozai-Lidov oscillations

ISIMA lectures on celestial mechanics. 3

Chapter 06 Let s Make a Solar System

How did it come to be this way? Will I stop sounding like the

Outline. Question of Scale. Planets Dance. Homework #2 was due today at 11:50am! It s too late now.

Planetarium observing is over. Nighttime observing starts next week.

The Mars 1:2 Resonant Population. Tabaré Gallardo.

Planet formation and (orbital) Evolution

Planet disk interaction

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 6. Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

A SYMPLECTIC MAPPING MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF 2:3 RESONANT TRANS-NEPTUNIAN MOTION

INVESTIGATION OF ORBITAL EVOLUTION OF INTERPLANETARY DUST PARTICLES ORIGINATING FROM KUIPER BELT AND ASTEROID BELT OBJECTS

Astronomy 111, Fall October 2011

Towards stability results for planetary problems with more than three bodies

Planetary Perturbations on the 2 : 3 Mean Motion Resonance with Neptune

Resonance and chaos ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS. II. Exterior resonances and asymmetric libration

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 15. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Chaotic diffusion of small bodies in the Solar System

Origin of the Solar System

The orbit evolution of 32 plutinos over 100 million year

Planetenbewegung in Sternsystemen. The Effect of Resonances. Part 2

A few points on the dynamical evolution of the young solar system. Renu Malhotra The University of Arizona

Planetary system dynamics Part III Mathematics / Part III Astrophysics

AST111, Lecture 1b. Measurements of bodies in the solar system (overview continued) Orbital elements

Class 15 Formation of the Solar System

ORBITAL RESONANCES IN PLANETARY SYSTEMS

Equation of orbital velocity: v 2 =GM(2/r 1/a) where: G is the gravitational constant (G=6.67x10 11 N/m 3 kg), M is the mass of the sun (or central

On the origin of the Trojan asteroids: Effects of Jupiter s mass accretion and radial migration

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Lecture 20: Planet formation II. Clues from Exoplanets

The dynamical evolution of the asteroid belt in the pebble accretion scenario

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 8 Feb 2017

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 3 Apr 2018

Observational Astronomy - Lecture 4 Orbits, Motions, Kepler s and Newton s Laws

On the Secular Evolution of Extrasolar Planetary Systems

Cosmology Vocabulary

Review III. ASTR 371, Fall Jovian Planets and Rings (Lecture Notes 9; Chap 12, 14)

Lecture 13. Gravity in the Solar System

Kuiper Belt Dynamics and Interactions

SOLAR SYSTEM 2019 SAMPLE EXAM

What can be learned from the dynamics of packed planetary systems?

Chapter 15 The Formation of Planetary Systems

1star 1 star 9 8 planets 63 (major) moons asteroids, comets, meteoroids

Clicker Question: Clicker Question: Clicker Question:

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 28 Sep 2017

9. Formation of the Solar System

Kepler, Newton, and laws of motion

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 7 Feb 2017

Possible commensurabilities among pairs of extrasolar planets

STABILITY OF HYPOTHETICAL TROJAN PLANETS IN EXOPLANETARY SYSTEMS

Epicycles the short form.

Celestial mechanics and dynamics. Topics to be covered. The Two-Body problem. Solar System and Planetary Astronomy Astro 9601

PHYSICS. Chapter 13 Lecture FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS A STRATEGIC APPROACH 4/E RANDALL D. KNIGHT Pearson Education, Inc.

On the Origin of the Trojan Asteroids: Effects of Jupiter s Mass Accretion and Radial Migration

Gravity: Motivation An initial theory describing the nature of the gravitational force by Newton is a product of the resolution of the

The Transit Timing method: How to detect extrasolar planets? Jean Coupon. (Supervisor: Norman W. Murray)

ANNEX 1. DEFINITION OF ORBITAL PARAMETERS AND IMPORTANT CONCEPTS OF CELESTIAL MECHANICS

A dwarf planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its selfgravity

= 0. = q i., q i = E

Phys 214. Planets and Life

Importance of the study of extrasolar planets. Exoplanets Introduction. Importance of the study of extrasolar planets

Planetary migration and the Late Heavy Bombardment (better late than never)

10/16/ Detecting Planets Around Other Stars. Chapter 10: Other Planetary Systems The New Science of Distant Worlds

M2A2 Problem Sheet 3 - Hamiltonian Mechanics

Survival of Trojan-Type Companions of Neptune During Primordial Planet Migration

Research Article Variation of the Equator due to a Highly Inclined and Eccentric Disturber

Advisor : Prof. Hagai Perets. Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa

Physics 106b: Lecture 7 25 January, 2018

DIFFUSION OF ASTEROIDS IN MEAN MOTION RESONANCES

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 11 Aug 2016

1 Solar System Debris and Formation

Planets: Name Distance from Sun Satellites Year Day Mercury 0.4AU yr 60 days Venus yr 243 days* Earth 1 1 yr 1 day Mars 1.

THE PLANE OF THE KUIPER BELT

1 of 5 5/2/2015 5:50 PM

Disc-Planet Interactions during Planet Formation

A dwarf planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its selfgravity

There are 4 x stars in the Galaxy

AST111 PROBLEM SET 2 SOLUTIONS. RA=02h23m35.65s, DEC=+25d18m42.3s (Epoch J2000).

EART162: PLANETARY INTERIORS

Galaxies: enormous collections of gases, dust and stars held together by gravity Our galaxy is called the milky way

Transcription:

Theory of mean motion resonances. Mean motion resonances are ubiquitous in space. They can be found between planets and asteroids, planets and rings in gaseous disks or satellites and planetary rings. They are also common in galaxies where star formation can be enhanced and may proceed either as a starburst or continuously over a long time period. In our solar system a macroscopic effect of MM resonances is represented by Kirkwood gaps in the orbital distribution of Main belt asteroids. In Figure the semimajor axis distribution of asteroids in the Main Belt is shown. Gaps of low density (Kirkwood gaps) are observed in correspondence to commensurabilities between the orbital period of Jupiter and that of the asteroid. This commensurability leads to a MM resonance configuration and, in some cases, to chaotic behaviour and escape from the Solar System. Trojans are also in a MM resonance (: between the orbital periods of the asteroid and Jupiter). There are about 2000 known Trojans of Juptier, 4 for Neptune and 3 for Mars.

The Kuiper Belt extends beyond the orbit of Neptune and it is populated by large bodies like Pluto and its satellite Charon. Pluto is in a 2:3 resonance with Neptune like other smaller bodies named Plutinos in the Kuiper Belt. Planets embedded in a disk excites the gas at MM resonances (Lindblad resonances) and exchange angular momentum with the disk migrating. For planets with a mass of a few Earth masses outer resonances win in terms of torque and the planet drifts towards the star. Largest planets (Jovian type) create a gap and evolve following the viscous infall of the disk towards the star. This evolution explains the large number of extrasolar planets on orbits very close to their parent star.

Hamiltonian of the 2-body problem. The equation of motion of the 2-body problem, represented by a mass m and a mass m 2 under the mutual gravitational attraction, is d 2 r dt 2 = G m m 2 r r 3 We now define =G m m 2 and the reduced mass = m m 2 m m 2 system is p= v. The Hamiltonian of the 2-body is so that the momentum of the H= 2 p 2 r and the Hamilton equations are ṙ= p H ṗ= r H We can make a coordinate change to Delunay canonical variables which are defined from the orbital elements in the following way l=m g= h= L= a G= a e 2 H = a e 2 cos i In these coordinates the Hamiltonian is H= 2 3 2 L 2 It is easy to show that this is indeed the Hamiltonian of the 2-body problem. Since H does not depend on G and H the Hamilton equations for g and h are ġ=0 and ḣ=0. The only non-constant variable is the mean anomaly l whose equation is l= H L = 2 3 L 3 = 2 3 3 a 3/2 = a 3 =n This equation tells us that the mean anomaly l has a fixed frequency equal to the mean motion n.

3-body problem in Hamiltonian form. Let's define the mass of the central body as M o, m the mass of the perturber and m=0 the mass of the test body. We consider the planar circular case with m on a circular orbit and all bodies moving on the same plane. The equation of motion is d 2 r dt = GM r 0 G m r r 2 r 3 r r 3 r r 3 where U r = GM 0 r r G m r r r r The Hamiltonian of the system is H= v2 r 3 2 GM 0 G m r r r r r r 3 = U r = v2 2 GM 0 R r,r r The Delunay variables (action-angle variables) are now defined as l=m g= h= L= G a G= L e 2 = G M o a e 2 H =G cosi= G M o a e 2 cosi and the reduced mass does not appear since the test body has 0 mass. In these new variables the Hamiltonian becomes H= G2 2 M o R L,G,H,l, g,h,t 2L 2 where the first term on the right is the Keplerian term and gives a 2-body motion around M o with constant frequency n, while the disturbing function R accounts for the changes in the other orbital elements and it can be thought as a perturbation of the 2-body motion. R can be expanded in a multiple Fourier series R=G m i=0 K i j G, L cos i l j l' g where the primes refer to the orbital elements of the body m. The reason why the index I ranges from [0, ] and not from [-, ] is due to the antisymmetry of the cos function cos(x) = cos(-x). As a consequence we have cos x y =cos x y cos x y =cos x y

so that cos i l j l' g =cos il j l ' g cos i l j l' g =cos il j l ' g and these terms can be collected in a single one. We talk of resonance when the following condition is met i l L,G j l' ġ L,G =0 i.e. if the frequency of the angle l is in a commensurability with the frequency of the angle l'-g. Often in literature a different index notation is used where i= p+q and j = -p. In this context the resonance condition becomes p q l L,G p l ' ġ L,G =0 When this condition is satisfied, the corresponding cos term in the Hamiltonian is constant or it changes slowly. As a consequence, its perturbative effects is stronger respect to the other terms and the Hamiltonian can be approximated as H= G2 2 M o G m 2L 2 K 00 Gm K i j cos where ψ is the slowly varying angle called critical argument =il j l ' g. The Hamiltonian can be further re-arranged but first we need to know what a canonical transformation is. Short tutorial on canonical transformation Definitions: A coordinate transformation from (p,q) to (w,z), where p and w are the momenta, is canonical if ) it preserves the Hamiltonian form of the equations of motion q i = H p i H p,q =k w, z ż i = H w i ṗ i = H q i ẇ i = H z i 2) It preserves the area, in other words the Jacobian of the transformation has determinant equal to w det p z p w q = z q

3) A generatrix function of mixed variables exists so that, ad example, p= F q,w q F q,w z= w A simple example is F=k q w so that w= p/k and z=kq. The harmonic oscillator equations of motion can be solved by using a canonical transformation. We start from its Hamiltonian H= p2 2m m 2 q 2 2 A suited canonical transformation is generated by the function F q, z = m 2 q2 cotg z The new variables w,z are related to p,q in the following way p= F q w= F z =m qcotg z q=± =m q2 2 sin 2 z 2w m sin z p=± 2 m w cos z The new Hamiltonian is obtained by substituting the expressions for p,q in the old Hamiltonian K w,z =H p,q = w cos 2 w sin 2 z= w The Hamilton equation in the new coordinates are ż= K w = ẇ= K z =0 and the solution is z= t z 0 q t =± 2w 0 m sin t z 0 w=w 0 p t =± 2 m w cos t z 0 Moving back to the old coordinates we have found a solution of the equations of motion. The philosophy is that using a suited canonical transformation we move to coordinates where the Hamiltonian is much simpler (ad example it depends only on momenta) and the Hamilton equation are

easy to solve. Pendulum model for the resonance Hamiltonian The Hamiltonian H= G2 M o 2 2 L 2 G m K 00 L,G Gm K i j L,G cos depends on a single angle which is a combination of Delunay variables. The mean anomaly of the planet l' is simply time because l'=n' t where n' is the constant mean motion (or orbital frequency) of the mass m on a circular orbit. The goal is at this point to find a canonical transformation that changes the original Hamiltonia in a simpler one possibly with less degrees of freedom (attention, G is for the gravity constant and for the Delunay variable conjugate of g). We introduce the resonance variables of Poincare' =l l' g = p q l p l' g = p q G p L /q = L G /q The generatrix of this transformation is the following function f t,l, g,, = p q l p l ' g l g l ' = The dependence on t is again over l'=n' t. It is easy to show that = f = f L= f l G= f g The Hamiltonian in the new canonical variables (which are still action-angle variables) becomes K=H f t = G 2 2 M o 2 p q pn' n' Gm K 00 2, Gm K p q, p, cos R f The presence of is due to the time dependence of f on t t f l ' l ' = p n ' n ' t In R all the remaining fast changing terms of the perturbative function are collected. We will concentrate hereinafter on first order resonances for which q=± (see Winter and Murray, A&A 39, 290, 997). If q= the orbit of m is internal to that of m as in the case of Main Belt asteroids. The opposite if q= which is the case of Pluto and Neptune. When dealing with these resonances we will introduce a single index j for the resonance so that j= p q for the massless body and j = p for m. With this new index the Hamiltonian and the Poincare' variabels become

K= G2 M o 2 2 j 2 j n' n' Gm K, cos = GM 0 a j e 2 j = GM 0 a e 2 In the Hamiltonian we have neglected R and K 0 0 as small terms. The resonance condition becomes G2 2 M o = K = j n'=0 3 2 j This condition has been derived assuming that the term periodic function. The resonance condition translates to Gm K, cos averages to 0 being a j j n' n = j a 3/2 a 3/2 =0 Ad example, the 2: resonance between an asteroid and Jupiter occurs when the semimajro axis of the asteroid is about 3.278 AU. To get the pendulum model, we need an additional effort to reduce the Hamiltonian to a single degree of freedom. Let's call r the exact value for which the above equation is satisfied (resonance condition). We can develop the Hamiltonian K in a Taylor series around r in the action variabel up to the second order. K= G2 2 M o M 2 o j 2 j r 2 G2 j r 3 G 2 M 2 o j 2 3 r 2 j r 4 r 2... j n' r j n' r... Combining the terms with the same terms in r we get to a simplified form K= A 0 A r A 2 r 2 B 0 cos where A 0 = G2 M o 2 2 j r 2 j n' r A = G2 M 2 o j j n'=0 3 j r A 2 = 3 G 2 M 2 o j 2 2 j r 4 The coefficient A is = 0 because it has the same form of the resonance condition, so it is 0 at the

resonance. The Hamiltonian then reads K= A 0 A 2 r 2 B 0 cos The action Φ is a constant of motion since K does not depend on the angle ϕ. The level curves for fixed energy are shown in figure. The red curve corresponds to the separatrix, which separates the libration motion from circulation. On the x-axis we must imagine to have ψ and on the y-axis r. We can derive the equation of the separatrix and in this way determines the amplitude of the resonance in the action space. We start from the level curves equation which can be derived assuming that the energy (the Hamiltonian K) is constant. Under this assumption we get = r ± K A B cos /2 0 0 A 0 For the separatrix, we know that when =0 then = r K= A 0 B 0. The equation for the separatrix is then and this leads to the equation = r ± B / 2 0 = A 2 cos r± 2B 0 sin A 2 2 The semi-amplitude of the resonance is ± 2B 0 A 2 Transforming this expression back to orbital elements lead to the resonance amplitude in semimajor axis (or mean motion). This can be found in Murray and Dermott (Nature, 30, 983) and it is n=± 2n2 e m M 0 a a ' f a a ' a= 2a 3n n

The amplitude depends also on the eccentricity of the orbit. In figure all main resonances in the asteroid belt are shown with their amplitudes. This grows with the eccentricity and when the resonance borders overlap the dynamical evolution is chaotic. This is seen in the following figure outlining the phase space. When the eccentricity (or mass ratio as in the case) grows the resonances overlap, the libration regions shrink and the evolution is chaotic.