Summary Report. 7-8 November, 2013 Sports Complex of the Central Sports Club of the Army, Severnyi mol 7 Baltiysk, Kaliningrad Oblast Region, Russia

Similar documents
Maritime Spatial Planning in a CCB s context Mikhail Durkin MSP Seminar, 22 November 2016 Riga, Latvia

Tackling MSP integration challenges in the BSR

Country Fiche Lithuania

This document has been verified by the responsible MSP authority (or representative) of Lithuania on

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region, transnational and project perspective Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat

Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

Country Fiche Estonia

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS. Dr. Margarita Stancheva

Country Fiche Estonia

Marine Spatial Planning Experience from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany) By Susan Toben

MSP on the national level Example from the Russia: Barents Sea/Kaliningrad

Country Fiche Latvia Updated October 2016

PartiSEApate: Multi-Level-Governance in Maritime Spatial Planning

International Conference and Summer School-Seminar Dynamics Of The Coastal Zone Of Non-Tidal Seas

Environmentally Sound Concepts for Spatial Use in the Baltic Sea Coastal Area of the Russian Federation

Croatian physical planning system and strategic approach to MSP

Maritime Spatial Planning: Transboundary Cooperation in the Celtic Seas Looking Ahead

Maritime Spatial Planning in Germany and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

Marine Spatial Planning as an important tool for implementing the MSFD

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP): A practical approach to ecosystembased

Natura 2000 in the marine environment: state of implementation and next steps

MODELS AND TOOLS FOR GOVERNANCE OF

Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning Andrej Abramić

Margarita Stancheva Hristo Stanchev & Robert Young 2. MEDCOAST JUBILEE WORKSHOP May 2015, Iberotel Sarigerme Park, Dalaman, Turkey

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Offshore Energy and Maritime Spatial Planning in the German EEZ

Identification of maritime spatial planning best practices in the Baltic Sea Region and other EU maritime regions

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

Country Fiche Sweden Updated May 2018

POLISH LAW ON MSP. Andrzej Cieślak Maritime Office in Gdynia

International Guidelines for Ecosystem-based, Marine Spatial Management

Country reports. Israel did not establish an Exclusive Economic Zone. Consequently, its jurisdiction is restricted to the Israeli territorial waters.

Maritime Spatial Planning Framework Directive Supported by INSPIRE

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

Necessary common minimum requirements for Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) in the Baltic Sea

National Polish services using regional products

National Perspectives - Portugal. Margarida Almodovar

Aquaculture Spatial Planning: The case of Greece

Country Fiche Latvia.

Outline National legislative & policy context Regional history with ESSIM ESSIM Evaluation Phase Government Integration via RCCOM Regional ICOM Framew

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

Multinational Spatial Planning Experience

1. Baltic SCOPE Towards coherence and cross-border solutions in Baltic Maritime Spatial Plans

Towards international cooperation in the development of Marine Spatial Plans for the North Pacific: economic, social, and environmental dimensions

Baltic Sea Region cooperation in Maritime Spatial Planning - HELCOM/VASAB

Agenda item Marine Spatial Palnning. 23 rd ASCOBANS AC Meeting Le Conquet Penina Blankett, Ministry of the Environment

Environmental impact assessment study of the new offshore dumping sites for Šventoji port in Lithuania

Dorset MSP Evidence Base 18 th February Ness Smith C-SCOPE Project Officer

DRAFT PROGRAM Registration of participants, welcome coffee, exhibition tour

Ecosystem-Based Approach in MSP

ICZM and MSP in the Black Sea Region

Introduction to IMP: need and added value

How to integrate maritime cultural heritage into maritime spatial planning?

The Danish Maritime Spatial Data Infrastructure (MSDI) Geodata of the Sea

W 2/3 Integration in Baltic Sea MSP: What role does it really play? Introduction. Michael Gilek Luttmann. Södertörn University.

Mediteranean sea issues in the view of ESPON ESaTDOR project and Marine Spatial Planning in Slovenia

The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan and Marine Spatial Planning

Evaluation Model for the Sustainable Development of European Coastal Zones

Building the Sustainable Network of Settlements on the Caspian Sea Region of Kazakhstan

Central Baltic Programme

MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING & MARINE CADASTRE: CHALLENGES AND ISSUES

Cross-border Maritime Spatial Plan for the Black sea - Romania and Bulgaria project

Education in Maritime Spatial Planning European Maritime Days May 22, 2012 Gothenburg

The Baltic Sea Region Maritime Spatial Planning Data Expert Sub-group. First Report 2015/2016/

Experiences and Lessons from BaltSeaPlan

Additional information (material for interactions and analysis chapter) to document 3/1, the PLAN BOTHNIA MSP Assessment

MyCoast Elaboration of a vision and a strategy for Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Bulgaria

MARINE PLANNING IN THE NETHERLANDS

Interest for HOs to cooperate with EU Commission:

Findings and recommendations from Central Baltic case

WELCOME & INTRODUCTION

Country Fiche Sweden.

MR. George ALEXAKIS, parallel session 3. "Mediterranean Sea Region. laying the conditions. for sustainable growth and jobs"

CAMP SLOVENIA. Mezek Slavko RRC Koper. Project coordinator November 2005

Evaluation of Spatial Planning as a Tool for Integrated Marine Management Status, Obstacles and Research Gaps

PROGRAM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CHAIRMANSHIP OF THE ARCTIC COUNCIL IN

THE ROLE OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INTERREG III B BALTCOAST PROJECT

PartiSEApate Conference

Ensuring Access to Marine Areas for Offshore Oil and Gas

MARITIME SPATIAL PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE BLUE ECONOMIES

Designing Networks of Marine Protected Areas in DFO s Three Atlantic Bioregions

Strengthening the cooperation in the region: Carpathian, Tisa,, Danube and Black Sea areas

TOWARDS CLIMATE-RESILIENT COASTAL MANAGEMENT: OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVED ICZM IN BELIZE

SAF - application case study Vistula Lagoon

I. LIBYA I.1. COUNTRY CHARACTERISTICS. Country reports

HELCOM-VASAB Maritime Spatial Planning Working Group Twelfth Meeting Gdansk, Poland, February 2016

Seatrack Web Developments

Marine Spatial Planning: A Tool for Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management

Community Engagement in Cultural Routes SiTI Higher Institute on Territorial Systems for Innovation Sara Levi Sacerdotti

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AS STRATEGY FOR PRO-POOR LAND MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

Options in Capacity Building. Underpinning the Blue Economy. Slide 1/78. Derrick R. Peyton. 14 th MACHC Meeting. IIC Technologies. December 9-13, 2013

BALANCE WP4: Development of a Baltic Sea marine area management framework. - with key inputs from WP1, WP2 & WP3

PLAN BOTHNIA MARE/2009/16

MCPAs AND POTENTIAL AREAS FOR SUB-REGIONAL COOPERATION

Policy framework The Netherlands and the Polar Regions, Summary and priorities

SustainBaltic FOUR FINALISED ICZM PLANS

GIS From Storing to Sharing. Esben Munk Sørensen

Transcription:

RU LT Transnational stakeholders meeting on the concept for maritime spatial planning in the Lithuanian Sea and its potential impacts on sea use in Russia 7-8 November, 2013 Sports Complex of the Central Sports Club of the Army, Severnyi mol 7 Baltiysk, Kaliningrad Oblast Region, Russia Summary Report Author of the report: Daniel Depellegrin, Nerijus Blažauskas *, Valdas Langas Coastal Research and Planning Institute, Klaipeda University, Lithuania Contact: *nb@corpi.ku.lt Goals of the workshop: To present the current state of the Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) process in Lithuania with key principles, concept solutions applied and potential future uses of the Lithuanian sea space. To identify existing seas uses and future development perspectives of the Russian and Lithuanian sea space that require cross-border consultation. To discuss with stakeholders potential conflicts and synergies for sea uses in the Russian Lithuanian sea space. Participants 26 persons participated in the workshop from BSR: Russia Lithuania Poland Atlantic Branch of P.P.Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of Russian Academy of Sciences (ABIORAS), Immanuell Kant Baltic Federal University, Marine Administration,, St. Petersburg NGO Ecology and Business, JSC St Petersburg "NIIPGradostroitel'stva", Baltiysk, IKBFO, Magazine Point (Media), Fishing Company, Administration of Svetly, Baltiysk Municipality, Institute for Spatial Planning, Development and Foreign Relations (NON Profit Partnership). Coastal Research and Planning Institute (CORPI), Klaipeda University Maritime Institute of Gdansk (MIG), Consulate General of Poland in Kaliningrad

Meeting overview The Stakeholder Meeting was structured in two sessions divided into day 1 and day 2 as follows: Day 1 (07/11/2013): MSP in the Russian Federation, Lithuania and Poland The Stakeholder Meeting was hold as parallel session to the Seminar on "Spatial planning in the Vistula Lagoon" under the VILA Project Features and benefits of sharing the Vistula Lagoon" of the Lithuania- Poland-Russia ENPI Cross-border Cooperation Programme 2007-2013 (www.lt-pl-ru.eu/en,1). This session brought together stakeholders from Poland Russia and Lithuania and aimed at introducing current MSP processes and planning principles in this specific part of South Eastern Baltic Sea. Presentation 1: MSP principles and concept solutions in the Lithuanian maritime space by N. Blažauskas, Klaipeda University, CORPI Aim and objectives of the plan is to supplement the Lithuanian General Territorial Plan with marine spatial solutions, stocktake the existing natural resources and current use and protection of those in order to set strategic priorities for future use, protection and development of Lithuanian marine areas. Planning process is composed by four parts: 1. analysis of current state of marine resources and existing uses 2. preparation of conceptual solutions (Alternative A and B) 3. SEA on proposed concept solutions in order to select the most suitable solutions; 4. preparation of the final spatial maritime development concept to be integrated into the General Plan of the Republic of Lithuania Presentation 2: Spatial planning of marine areas and coastal zone according to the Polish legislation by Andzej Ciesliak, HELCOM-VASAB working group/mog Overview on Polish legislation for Marine Spatial Planning. Presentation 3: The basic principles of spatial planning of maritime activities in the Russian Federation. Viazilova Julia Semionov, "NIIPGradostroitel'stva", St. Petersburg, Russia. Ms. Julia Viazilova of the Scientific Research Institute "Gradostroitelsvo" (St. Petersburg) made a presentation on the Russian Federation basic principles on sea use planning in the Baltic Sea area, for the water areas of Kaliningrad Region and the Leningrad Region, Neva Bay and the Gulf of Finland. On overall the criteria for the classification of functional zones and their respective aquatorial zones are defined as follows: Criteria for Classification of functional zones Types of aquatorial zones Degree of priority Operational Main priorities for the state target use General use Nature of activities and Shipping zone

functional purpose Areas of maritime ports Restriction on prohibitions on the use of areas of water (buffer zones) Zone polygons navy department Zones of underwater cables and pipelines Fishing zones, zones of development of aquaculture Area of accommodation of objects of electric power industry Production areas and exploration of minerals Tourist recreation zones Environmental area Zones with special conditions for the use of water Forbidden areas for navigation and anchoring Zones of protection of underwater engineering communications Protection zone of artificial constructions Protection zones of waterways Areas spawning, feeding fish, migratory parking birds, nesting waterfowl and near water kinds of birds Specially protected areas and their buffer zones Area and zones of protection of objects of cultural heritage The base structure of the Russian MSP Stocktake for MSP can be defined as follow: o Block1: data on natural resources such as hydrological conditions, geomorphological conditions, marine habitats, spawning areas, bird migration and nesting areas, specially protected natural areas. o Block2: data on ecological component such as source of anthropogenic load, chemical pollution of water and sediments, eutrophication, sustainability of the marine environment by anthropogenic load. o Block3: Socio Economic activities such as administrative structures, human settlements and resources, marine, industrial and infrastructural potential. o Block4: Cultural Heritage features. o Block5: Normative documents regarding nature management, state standards, sanitary regulations and standards assessment of the marine environment components. It was noted that the Russian Federation has no experience in MSP. There are about 100 legal acts related to marine planning, but they are not integrated. Responsible for sea use planning is federal government. The RU government approved a strategy on maritime activities till 2030. Strategy foresees development of sea use planning legal documents / instruments. Therefore preparation of the law on activities planning at sea has already started. Presentation 4: Marine spatial planning in the Vistula Lagoon. Dmitry Domnin, ABIORAS, Kaliningrad, Russia The overall objective of the VILA project is the intensification of socioeconomic cooperation among PL-RU regions of the Vistula Lagoon with some specific objectives: To increase cooperation for optimal realization of Vistula Lagoon socioeconomic potential

(reports on natural environment and socioeconomic conditions of the Vistula Lagoon and creation of the catalogue on transport infrastructure); Seminar on improvement of territorial accessibility and cross-border mobility within Vistula Lagoon region; Recommendations and guidelines for future cooperation and common regional development around Vistula Lagoon, through series of dedicated seminars and study visits (attractiveness of region regarding tourist and natural environment); Two Handbooks published: first on the Baltic port development in the context of spatial planning, second on sustainable development in Vistula Lagoon region; Public consultations in Poland and Russia on future development on Vistula Lagoon and on spatial planning; Roadmap for future common activities, etc.the presentation provided an overall introduction of MSP in the context of the Vistula Lagoon. Day 2 (08/11/2013): Focused group discussion with RU - LT MSP experts addressing present and future sea uses, synergies and conflicts in the RU LT sea space. Military areas The sea space in the Kaliningrad Oblast Region is predominantly a military area. Interest was expressed by Russian Stakeholders on the rule of military areas in the Lithuanian MSP case, which are used in a combined use as protected areas. Nature protection The Lukoil D6 Platform is located in the Russian sea space at 22.5 km distance from the UNESCO World Heritage site of named Curonian and 4.3 nm from Lithuanian sea border. This sensitive environment is at potential oil spill risk, as far as 67% of simulated oil spills would impact the Lithuanian part of the Curonian Spit. Furthermore international law does not regulate liability and compensation issues in case of pollution incident by such type of off shore activity; hence the application of polluter pays principle. Plans exist to develop nature protection area till the 25 m isobath similar to the existing Lithuanian coastal Strip (Law of the Coastal Strip, 2002), which is the national ICZM unit in Lithuania and one of the zoning area of the Lithuanian MSP for recreational, nature protection and fishery purposes. OWE development On overall it was noted that joined RU/LT projects are essential to development of baseline information for MSP stocktaking. In the specific case of OWE development several projects produced baseline information to assess conditions for OWE development in the Polish, Russian and Lithuanian sea space (http://www.corpi.ku.lt/power/). The baseline information identified is the following: 1. Spatial data on optimal allocation of OWE parks. 2. Concepts for power parks connectivity into Lithuanian power grid. 3. Economic feasibility studies for OWE park development. 4. Perspectives for trans-border grid network interconnection. In the meantime the advancing Lithuanian MSP process defined 10 potential sea areas designated for OWE development, whereas 4 of them are currently under EIA. Findings/Conclusions At the current stage it is complicated to identify any sea use conflict between LT and RU MSP s, whereas the development of Russian sea-use plan has yet not started and is on a conceptual stage.

It was agreed to arrange the next LT- RU meeting on MSP issues with involvement of RU representative s directly responsible/related to sea space planning activities. It was agreed that results from the joined questionnaire on MSP in the Vistula lagoon will be analyszed by Russian meeting partners and submitted to CORPI for further evaluation.