Finslerian Nonholonomic Frame For Matsumoto (α,β)-metric

Similar documents
2-π STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED TO THE LAGRANGIAN MECHANICAL SYSTEMS UDC 531.3: (045)=111. Victor Blãnuţã, Manuela Gîrţu

Projective change between two Special (α, β)- Finsler Metrics

SOME RESULTS ON TRANSFORMATIONS GROUPS OF N-LINEAR CONNECTIONS IN THE 2-TANGENT BUNDLE

ON HOLLAND S FRAME FOR RANDERS SPACE AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN PHYSICS

Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyíregyháziensis 24 (2008), ISSN

ABOUT THE GROUP OF TRANSFORMATIONS OF METRICAL SEMISYMMETRIC N LINEAR CONNECTIONS ON A GENERALIZED HAMILTON SPACE OF ORDER TWO

NATURAL 2-π STRUCTURES IN LAGRANGE SPACES

Randers Space with Special Nonlinear Connection

Vanishing S-curvature of Randers spaces

M-LINEAR CONNECTION ON THE SECOND ORDER REONOM BUNDLE

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

Mathematical Preparations

Perfect Fluid Cosmological Model in the Frame Work Lyra s Manifold

PAijpam.eu NONHOLONOMIC FRAMES FOR A FINSLER SPACE WITH GENERAL (α, β)-metric

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

Three views of mechanics

Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyíregyháziensis 24 (2008), ISSN

Comparative Studies of Law of Conservation of Energy. and Law Clusters of Conservation of Generalized Energy

Lagrangian Field Theory

A particle in a state of uniform motion remain in that state of motion unless acted upon by external force.

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. D Alembert s Principle and The Lagrangian-1

Poisson brackets and canonical transformations

ENERGY-DEPENDENT MINKOWSKI METRIC IN SPACE-TIME

A new Approach for Solving Linear Ordinary Differential Equations

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

THEORY OF FINSLER SUBMANIFOLDS VIA BERWALD CONNECTION

Affine and Riemannian Connections

On the geometry of higher order Lagrange spaces.

Week3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity

Uniqueness of Weak Solutions to the 3D Ginzburg- Landau Model for Superconductivity

Mechanics Physics 151

11. Dynamics in Rotating Frames of Reference

Randić Energy and Randić Estrada Index of a Graph

The Symmetries of Kibble s Gauge Theory of Gravitational Field, Conservation Laws of Energy-Momentum Tensor Density and the

VARIATION OF CONSTANT SUM CONSTRAINT FOR INTEGER MODEL WITH NON UNIFORM VARIABLES

η-einstein Complex Finsler-Randers Spaces

Using T.O.M to Estimate Parameter of distributions that have not Single Exponential Family

On Tiling for Some Types of Manifolds. and their Folding

arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 31 Oct 2007

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

An efficient algorithm for multivariate Maclaurin Newton transformation

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

coordinates. Then, the position vectors are described by

Screen transversal conformal half-lightlike submanifolds

CHAPTER 14 GENERAL PERTURBATION THEORY

In this section is given an overview of the common elasticity models.

Canonical transformations

MMA and GCMMA two methods for nonlinear optimization

SUPER PRINCIPAL FIBER BUNDLE WITH SUPER ACTION

Lecture 20: Noether s Theorem

CONDITIONS FOR INVARIANT SUBMANIFOLD OF A MANIFOLD WITH THE (ϕ, ξ, η, G)-STRUCTURE. Jovanka Nikić

About Three Important Transformations Groups

The Dirac Monopole and Induced Representations *

9 Characteristic classes

Analytical classical dynamics

Physics 607 Exam 1. ( ) = 1, Γ( z +1) = zγ( z) x n e x2 dx = 1. e x2

Problem adapted reduced models based on Reaction-Diffusion Manifolds (REDIMs)

The Feynman path integral

Chapter 8. Potential Energy and Conservation of Energy

On a direct solver for linear least squares problems

Mechanics Physics 151

Elshaboury SM et al.; Sch. J. Phys. Math. Stat., 2015; Vol-2; Issue-2B (Mar-May); pp

Physics 181. Particle Systems

Nonclassical Electromagnetic Dynamics

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Formulas for the Determinant

Errors in Nobel Prize for Physics (7) Improper Schrodinger Equation and Dirac Equation

χ x B E (c) Figure 2.1.1: (a) a material particle in a body, (b) a place in space, (c) a configuration of the body

THE EFFECT OF TORSIONAL RIGIDITY BETWEEN ELEMENTS ON FREE VIBRATIONS OF A TELESCOPIC HYDRAULIC CYLINDER SUBJECTED TO EULER S LOAD

Integrals and Invariants of Euler-Lagrange Equations

A New Refinement of Jacobi Method for Solution of Linear System Equations AX=b

A P PL I CA TIONS OF FRACTIONAL EXTERIOR DI F F ER EN TIAL IN THR EE- DI M ENSIONAL S PAC E Ξ

A Hybrid Variational Iteration Method for Blasius Equation

On quasiperfect numbers

σ τ τ τ σ τ τ τ σ Review Chapter Four States of Stress Part Three Review Review

FACTORIZATION IN KRULL MONOIDS WITH INFINITE CLASS GROUP

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

Classical Field Theory

Perron Vectors of an Irreducible Nonnegative Interval Matrix

The Expectation-Maximization Algorithm

Convexity preserving interpolation by splines of arbitrary degree

Lecture Note 3. Eshelby s Inclusion II

CHAPTER 6. LAGRANGE S EQUATIONS (Analytical Mechanics)

CHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE

POINCARE ALGEBRA AND SPACE-TIME CRITICAL DIMENSIONS FOR PARASPINNING STRINGS

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 15 Jun 2007

Group Analysis of Ordinary Differential Equations of the Order n>2

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Newtonian Mechanics

Army Ants Tunneling for Classical Simulations

Lecture 3. Ax x i a i. i i

Chapter 5. Solution of System of Linear Equations. Module No. 6. Solution of Inconsistent and Ill Conditioned Systems

Ballot Paths Avoiding Depth Zero Patterns

Geodesic mappings of equiaffine and anti-equiaffine general affine connection spaces preserving torsion

Another converse of Jensen s inequality

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformation II

Econ107 Applied Econometrics Topic 3: Classical Model (Studenmund, Chapter 4)

Yong Joon Ryang. 1. Introduction Consider the multicommodity transportation problem with convex quadratic cost function. 1 2 (x x0 ) T Q(x x 0 )

Module 9. Lecture 6. Duality in Assignment Problems

SL n (F ) Equals its Own Derived Group

ON A DETERMINATION OF THE INITIAL FUNCTIONS FROM THE OBSERVED VALUES OF THE BOUNDARY FUNCTIONS FOR THE SECOND-ORDER HYPERBOLIC EQUATION

Transcription:

Internatonal Journal of Mathematcs and Statstcs Inventon (IJMSI) E-ISSN: 2321 4767 P-ISSN: 2321-4759 ǁ Volume 2 ǁ Issue 3 ǁ March 2014 ǁ PP-73-77 Fnsleran Nonholonomc Frame For Matsumoto (α,)-metrc Mallkarjuna Y. Kumbar, Narasmhamurthy S.K., Kavyashree A.R.. Department of P.G. Studes and Research n Mathematcs,Kuvempu Unversty, Shankaraghatta - 577451,Shmoga, Karnataka, INDIA. ABSTRACT: The whole pont of classcal dynamcs s to show how a system changes n tme; n other words, how does a pont on the confguraton space change once we gve ntal condtons? For a system wth nonholonomc constrants, the state after some tme evoluton depends on the partcular path taken to reach t. In other words, one can return to the orgnal pont n confguraton space but not return to the orgnal state. The man am of ths paper s, frst we determne the Fnsler deformatons to the Matsumoto (α, ) metrc and we construct the Fnsleran nonholonomc frame. Further we obtan the Fnsleran nonholonomc frame for specal (α, )- metrc.e., F = c 1 + α 2, (c 1 0). KEY WORDS: Fnsler space, (α, ) metrcs, GL metrc, Fnsleran nonolonomc frame. I. INTRODUCTION In 1982, P.R. Holland ([1][2]), studes a unfed formalsm that uses a nonholonomc frame on space-tme arsng from consderaton of a charged partcle movng n an external electromagnetc feld. In fact, R.S. Ingarden [3] was frst to pont out that the Lorentz force law can be wrtten n ths case as geodesc equaton on a Fnsler space called Randers space. The author Bel R.G. ([5][6]), have studed a gauge transformaton vewed as a nonholonomc frame on the tangent bundle of a four dmensonal base manfold. The geometry that follows from these consderatons gves a unfed approach to gravtaton and gauge symmetres. The above authors used the common Fnsler dea to study the exstence of a nonholonomc frame on the vertcal subbundle V TM of the tangent bundle of a base manfold M. Consder a j (x), the components of a Remannan metrc on the base manfold M,a(x, y) > 0 two functons on TM and B(x, y) = B (x, y)dx a vertcal 1-form on TM. Then g j (x, y) = a(x, y)a j (x) + b(x, y)b (x)b j (x) (1.1) s a generalzed Lagrange metrc, called the Bel metrc. We say also that the metrc tensor g j s a Bel deformaton of the Remannan metrc a j. It has been studed and appled by R. Mron and R.K. Tavakol n General Relatvty for a(x, y) = exp 2σ(x, y). The case a(x, y) = 1 wth varous choces of b and B was ntroduced and studed by R.G. Bel for constructng a new unfed feld theory [6]. In ths paper, the fundamental tensor feld mght be taught as the result of two Fnsler deformatons. Then we can determne a correspondng frame for each of these two Fnsler deformatons. Consequently, a Fnsleran nonholonomc frame for a Matsumoto (α, ) metrc and specal (α, ) metrc.e., F = c 1 + α 2 (c 1 0) wll appear as a product of two Fnsler frames formerly determned. As f c 1 = 0 then t takes form of Kropna metrc case. 73 P a g e

II. PRELIMINARIES An mportant class of Fnsler spaces s the class of Fnsler spaces wth (α, ) metrcs [11]. The frst Fnsler spaces wth (α, ) metrc were ntroduced by the physcst G. Randers n 1940, are called Randers spaces [4]. Recently, R.G. Bel suggested to consder a more general case, the class of Lagrange spaces wth (α, ) metrc, whch was dscussed n [12]. A unfed formalsm whch uses a nonholonomc frame on space tme, a sort of plastc deformaton, arsng from consderaton of a charged partcle movng n an external electromagnetc feld n the background space tme vewed as a straned mechansm studed by P.R. Holland [1][2].If we do not ask for the functon L to be homogeneous of order two wth respect to the (α, ) varables, then we have a Lagrange space wth (α, ) metrc. Next we look for some dfferent Fnsler space wth (α, ) metrcs. Defnton 2.1. : A Fnsler space F n = (M, F(x, y)) s called (α, ) metrc f there exsts a 2-homogeneous functon L of two varables such that the Fnsler metrc F: TM R s gven by, F 2 (x, y) = L(α(x, y), (x, y)), α 2 (x, y) = a j (x)y y j, α s a Ramannan metrc on M, and (x, y) = b (x)y s a 1 form on M. 2 F 2 Consder g j = 1 the fundamental tensor of the Randers space (M, F), takng nto 2 y y j account the homogenety of α and F we have the followng formulae: p = 1 α y α = a j ; p y j = a j p j = α ; y l = 1 L y L = g j ; l y j = g j L = p y j + b ; l = 1 L p ; l l j = p p = 1; l p = α L ; p l = L ; b α p = ; b α l =. L wth respect to these notatons, the metrc tensors a j and g j are related by [13], g j = L α a j + b p j + p b j + b b j α p p j = L α a j p p j + l l j. Theorem 2.1: For a Fnsler space (M, F) consder the matrx wth the entres: Y j = α L (δ j l l j + α L p p j ) (2.4) defned on TM. Then Y j = Y j, j 1,2,., n s an nonholonomc frame. y Theore m 2.2: Wth respect to frame the holonomc components of the Fnsler metrc tensor (a α ) s the Randers metrc (g j ).. e g j = Y α Y j a α. (2.5) Throughout ths secton we shall rse and lower ndces only wth the Remannan metrc a j (x).e., y = a j y j, b = a j b j, and so on. For a Fnsler space wth (α, ) metrc F 2 (x, y) = L α(x, y), (x, y) we have the Fnsler nvarenrs 13. ρ 1 = 1 L ; ρ 2a α 0 = 1 2 L ; ρ 2 2 1 = 1 2 L ; ρ 2α α = 1 2 L 1 L : (2.6) 2a 2 α 2 α α, subscrpts, 1,0, 1 gves us the degree of homogenety of these nvarants. For a Fnsler space wth (α, ) metrc 74 P a g e

we have: ρ 1 + ρ α 2 = 0. (2.7) wth respect to these notatons, we have that the metrc tensor g j of a Fnsler space wth (α, ) metrc s gven by 13 : g j (x, y) = ρa j (x) + ρ 0 b (x) + ρ 1 b (x)y j + b j (x)y + ρ y y j (2.8) From (2.8) we can see that g j s the result of two Fnsler deformatons: ) a j j = ρa j + 1 (ρ ρ 1 b + ρ y )(ρ 1 b j + ρ y j ) ) j g j = j + 1 (ρ ρ 0 ρ ρ 2 1 )b b j. (2.9) The Fnsleran nonholonomc frame that corresponds to the frst deformaton (2.9) s, accordng to the Theorem 7.9.1 n 10, gven by: x j = ρδ j 1 B2 B2 ( ρ ± ρ + ) ρ ρ 1 b + ρ y (ρ 1 b j + y j ) (2.10) B 2 = a j ρ 1 b + ρ y ρ 1 b j + ρ y j = ρ 1 b 2 + ρ 1 ρ. The metrc tensors a j and j are related by: j = X k X l j a kl (2.11) Agan the frame that corresponds to the second deformaton (2.9) s gven by: Y j = δ j 1 1 ± 1 + ρ C 2 C 2 ρ 0 ρ ρ 2 b b j, (2.12) 1 C 2 = j b b j = ρb 2 + 1 (ρ ρ 1 b 2 + ρ ) 2. The metrc tensors j and g j are related by the formula: g mn = Y m Y n j j. (2.13) Theorem 2. 3: Let F 2 (x, y) = L α(x, y), (x, y) be the metrc functon of a Fnsler space wth (α, ) metrc for whch the condton (2.7) s true. Then v j = X k k Y j s a Fnsleran nonholonomc frame wth X k and Y k j are gven by (2.10) and (2.12) respectvely. III. FINSLERIAN NONHOLONOMIC FRAME FOR (α, ) metrc In ths secton, we consder two Fnsler spaces wth (α, ) metrcs, such as Matsumoto metrc and specal (α, ) metrc. e., F = c 1 + α 2 then we construct Fnsleran nonholonomc frame for these. 3.1 FINSLERIAN NONHOLONOMIC FRAME FOR MATSUMOTO (α, ) METRIC: In the frst case, for a Fnsler space wth the fundamental functon L = F 2 = (α ) 2, the Fnsler nvarants (2.6 ) are gven by: ρ 1 = α2 (α), ρ (α ) 3 0 = 3α3 ρ (α ) 4 1 = α2 (α 4), ρ (α ) 4 = (4α ). (3.1) (α ) 4 B 2 = α2 (α 4) 2 (b 2 α 2 ) (α ) 8 α4 75 P a g e

Usng (3.1) n (2.10) we have, X j = α 2 (α) (α ) 3 δ j α2 b 2 α 2 2 Agan usng (3.1) n (2.12) we have, α 2 (α) (α ) 3 ± α2 ( α 2 +2α 2 +2 3 +b 2 α 3 4b 2 α 2 ) (α ) 4 b y α 2 b j y j α 2. (3.2) Y j = δ j 1 1 ± (α )3 C 2 b b C 2 α 2 j ; (3.3) C 2 = α2 (α 2)b 2 (α ) 3 (α 4) b2 α 2 2 2 (α ) 4. α4 Theorem 3.4: Consder a Fnsler space L = (α ) 2, for whch the condton (2.7) s true. Then V j = X k k Y j s a Fnsleran nonholonomc frame wth X k and Y j k are gven by (3.2) and (3.3) respectvely. 3.2 FINSLERIAN NONHOLONOMIC FRAME FOR SPECIAL (α, ) METRIC. e., F = c 1 + α2 : In the second case, for a Fnsler space wth the fundamental functon L = F 2 = c 1 + α22, the Fnsler nvarants (2.6) are gven by: Usng (3.4) n (2.10) we have, ρ 1 = 2(c 1 2 + α 2 ) 2, ρ 0 = c 1 2 4 + 3α 4 4, ρ 1 = 4α 2, ρ 3 = 4 B 2 = 16α2 (α 2 b 2 2 ) 6 X j = 2, (3.4) 2(c 1 2 + α 2 ) 2 δ j 6 2 c1 2 +α 2 2 ± 2 4 c1 α 2 2 +2α 4 b 2 4 1 16 Agan usng (3.4) n (2.12) we have, 4y 2 α 2 (α 2 b 2 2 ) 4α 2 b 4y j 4a 2 b j 3 3 3 (3.5) were Y j = δ j 1 C 2 1 ± 1 C2 4 α 4 c 1 2 4 b b j (3.6) C 2 = 2(c 1 2 + α 2 ) 2 + 4(α2 b 2 2 ) 2 4. 76 P a g e

Theorem 3.5: Consder a Fnsler space L= c 1 + α 2 2, for whch the condton (2.7) s true.then V j = X k Y j k s a Fnsleran nonholonomc frame wth X k and Y j k are gven by (3.5)and (3.6) respectvely. IV. CONCLUSION Nonholonomc frame relates a sem-remannan metrc (the Mnkowsk or the Lorentz metrc) wth an nduced Fnsler metrc. Antonell P.L., Bucataru I. ([7][8]), has been determned such a nonholonomc frame for two mportant classes of Fnsler spaces that are dual n the sense of Randers and Kropna spaces [9]. As Randers and Kropna spaces are members of a bgger class of Fnsler spaces, namely the Fnsler spaces wth (α, ) metrc, t appears a natural queston: Does how many Fnsler space wth (α, ) metrcs have such a nonholonomc frame? The answer s yes, there are many Fnsler space wth (α, ) metrcs. In ths work, we consder the two specal Fnsler metrcs and we determne the Fnslerannonholonomc frames. Each of the frames we found here nduces a Fnsler connecton on TM wth torson and no curvature. But, n Fnsler geometry, there are many (α, ) metrcs, n future work we can determne the frames for them also. REFERENCES [1] Holland. P.R., Electromagnetsm, Partcles and Anholonomy. Physcs Letters, 91 (6), 275-278 (1982). [2] Holland. P.R., Anholonomc deformatons n the ether: a sgnfcance for the electrodynamc potentals. In: Hley, B.J. Peat, F.D. (eds.), Quantum Implcatons. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York, 295-311 (1987). [3] Ingarden, R.S., On asymmetrc metrc n the four space of general rela-tvty. Tensor N.S., 46, 354-360 (1987). [4] Randers, G., On asymmetrc metrc n the four space of general rela-tvty. Phys. Rev., 59, 195-199 (1941). [5] Bel, R.G., Comparson of unfed feld theores. Tensor N.S., 56, 175-183 (1995). [6] Bel, R.G., Equatons of Moton from Fnsler Geometrc Methods. In: Antonell, P.L. (ed), Fnsleran Geometres. A meetng of mnds. Kluwer Academc Publsher, FTPH, no. 109, 95-111 (2000). [7] Antonell, P.L. and Bucataru, I., On Hollands frame for Randers space and ts applcatons n Physcs,. preprnt. In: Kozma, L. (ed), Steps n Dfferental Geometry. Proceedngs of the Colloquum on Dfferental Geometry, Debrecen, Hungary, July 25-30, 2000. Debrecen: Unv. Debrecen, Insttute of Mathematcs and Informatcs, 39-54 (2001). [8] Antonell, P.L. and Bucataru, I., Fnsler connectons n an holonomc geometry of a Kropna space,.to appear n Nonlnear Studes. [9] Hrmuc, D. and Shmada, H., On the L-dualty between Lagrange and Hamlton manfolds, Nonlnear World, 3(1996), 613-641.8 Mallkarjuna Y. Kumbar, Narasmhamurthy S.K. and Kavyashree A.R. [10] Ioan Bucataru, Radu Mron, Fnsler-Lagrange Geometry. Applcatons to dynamcal systems, CEEX ET 3174/2005-2007, CEEX M III 12595/2007 (2007). [11] Matsumoto, M., Theory of Fnsler spaces wth (α, ) metrcs. Rep. Math. Phys. 31(1991), 43-83. [12] Bucataru I., Nonholonomc frames on Fnsler geometry. Balkan Journal of Geometry and ts Applcatons, 7 (1), 13-27 (2002). [13] Matsumoto, M., Foundatons of Fnsler Geometry and Specal Fnsler Spaces, Kashesha Press, Otsu,Japan, 1986. 77 P a g e