Perspective of interometry in Antarctica

Similar documents
ALADDIN on the road to DARWIN

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 14 Oct 2005

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 23 Nov 2018

The Antarctic Planet Interferometer and the Potential for Interferometric Observations of Extrasolar Planets from Dome C Antarctica

The Concordia Station on the Antarctic Plateau: The Best Site on Earth for the 21st Century Astronomers

Classical Interferometric Arrays. Andreas Quirrenbach Landessternwarte Heidelberg

An Off-Axis Telescope Concept for Antarctic Astronomy

AST 101 Intro to Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies

End-to-end model for the Polychromatic Laser Guide Star project (ELP-OA)

PHOTOMETRIC QUALITY OF DOME C FOR THE WINTER 2008 FROM ASTEP SOUTH

An optimized nulling ground based demonstrator for DARWIN: the ALADDIN proposal

Searching for Other Worlds: The Methods

Phase-Referencing and the Atmosphere

Collecting Light. In a dark-adapted eye, the iris is fully open and the pupil has a diameter of about 7 mm. pupil

Telescopes. Optical Telescope Design. Reflecting Telescope

PML/PBL: A new generalized monitor of atmospheric turbulence profiles

ASTR 1120 General Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies

Astronomy. Optics and Telescopes

On to Telescopes. Imaging with our Eyes. Telescopes and cameras work much like our eyes. ASTR 1120 General Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies !

Auxiliary Telescopes at Dome C

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

ARENA Telescope and Instrument Robotization at Dome C Tenerife, Spain, 27/03/2007

Astronomy 1 Fall 2016

PEGASE: a DARWIN/TPF pathfinder

Astar s most important attributes are its mass, temperature, radius, composition, and rate of rotation. The Sun, for

FINITO: Three-Way Interferometric Fringe Sensor for VLTI

Hypertelescope Optical Observatory

PILOT - THE PATHFINDER FOR AN INTERNATIONAL LARGE OPTICAL TELESCOPE

Which property of a star would not change if we could observe it from twice as far away? a) Angular size b) Color c) Flux d) Parallax e) Proper Motion

WAVEFRONT CHARACTERIZATION CAMPAIGN AT PARANAL

PBL: A monitor of atmospheric turbulence profile

Telescopes. Optical Telescope Design. Reflecting Telescope

CASSEGRAIN TELESCOPE

DIRECT DETECTION OF SUB-STELLAR COMPANIONS WITH MIDI

Light Pollution. Atmospheric Seeing. Seeing Through the Atmosphere. Atmospheric Absorption of Light

Telescopes. A Warm Up Exercise. A Warm Up Exercise. A Warm Up Exercise. A Warm Up Exercise. Key Ideas:

Atmospheric Scintillation at Dome C, Antarctica: Implications for Photometry and Astrometry

Collaborative Site Testing in West China,

Telescopes (Chapter 6)

LOTUCE: A new monitor for turbulence characterization inside telescope s dome

Dome C atmospheric conditions: implications for astronomy

Telescopes. Lecture 7 2/7/2018

ELP-OA : status report of the setup of the demonstrator of the Polychromatic Laser Guide Star at Observatoire de Haute-Provence

Chapter 5. Telescopes. Copyright (c) The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.

Pipeline reductions of AMBER calibrator data

Image requirements for the detection and caracterisation of Earth-like planets and hot Jupiter s

Observations of extrasolar planets

Medium baseline, high sensitivity, high efficiency imaging interferometer for general astrophysics

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

ASTRONOMY Merit Badge Requirements

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 26 Apr 2006

AST 101 INTRODUCTION TO ASTRONOMY SPRING MIDTERM EXAM 1 TEST VERSION 1 ANSWERS NOTE: Question 20 Fixed

Speckles and adaptive optics

Chapter 5 Light: The Cosmic Messenger. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.

The well-composed image was recorded over a period of nearly 2 hours as a series of 30 second long, consecutive exposures on the night of October 5.

Universe Now. 2. Astronomical observations

Midterm 1. - Covers Ch. 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 (HW 1, 2, 3, & 4) ** bring long green SCANTRON 882 E short answer questions (show work)

How can we understand the Antarctic atmosphere?

Tools of Modern Astronomy

Stars, Galaxies & the Universe (29:50) Professor C.C. Lang Exam #1 - Fall 2010 Wednesday, September 22 nd FORM B - SOLUTIONS

Chapter 5: Telescopes

Monitoring Site Parameters for AO

An introduction to closure phases

Meteorological Parameter Analysis above Dome C Using Data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts

Refraction is the bending of light when it passes from one substance into another. Your eye uses refraction to focus light.

Micro-fluctuations of Fried s parameter (r 0 )

PILOT the Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope

NPOI Current Status and Recent Science

Interferometry for pedestrians - a very brief introduction and basic concepts 1

Hypertelescopes without delay lines.

AS750 Observational Astronomy

PHYS 160 Astronomy Test #2 Fall 2017 Version A

Discussion Review Test #2. Units 12-19: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE

Coronal Magnetometry Jean Arnaud, Marianne Faurobert, Gérad Grec et Jean-Claude Vial. Jean Arnaud Marianne Faurobert Gérard Grec et Jean-Claude Vial

Radio Interferometry and Aperture Synthesis

Spectral Resolution in Interferometry

Chapter 6 Telescopes: Portals of Discovery

Cheapest nuller in the World: Crossed beamsplitter cubes

DOME C AS A SETTING FOR THE PERMANENT ALL SKY SURVEY (PASS)

A2 Principi di Astrofisica. Coordinate Celesti

Adaptive Optics Sky Coverage for Dome C Telescopes

Useful Formulas and Values

Properties of Stars. N. Sharp (REU/NOAO/AURA/NSF)

, Th. Preibisch ', P. Stee 2, G. Weigelt ' Max-Planck-Institut f ur Radioastronomie, Auf dem H ugel 69, Bonn, Germany

9/19/ Basic Properties of Light and Matter. Chapter 5: Light: The Cosmic Messenger. What is light? Lecture Outline

Chapter 6 Light and Telescopes

Optical Turbulence in the Antarctic Atmosphere

What are the most important properties of a telescope? Chapter 6 Telescopes: Portals of Discovery. What are the two basic designs of telescopes?

Direct imaging and characterization of habitable planets with Colossus

1. Give short answers to the following questions. a. What limits the size of a corrected field of view in AO?

The point in an orbit around the Sun at which an object is at its greatest distance from the Sun (Opposite of perihelion).

Optical Turbulence Profiles at Mauna Kea Measured by MASS and SCIDAR

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Jun 2006

Characterizing Closure-phase Measurements at IOTA

X Rays must be viewed from space used for detecting exotic objects such as neutron stars and black holes also observing the Sun.

Chapter 6 Telescopes: Portals of Discovery. Agenda. How does your eye form an image? Refraction. Example: Refraction at Sunset

Summary. Week 7: 10/5 & 10/ Learning from Light. What are the three basic types of spectra? Three Types of Spectra

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 12 Jan 2011

Transcription:

Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège, Vol. 74, 5-6, 2005 Perspective of interometry in Antarctica B. Valat 1, B. Lopez 2, F.X. Schmider 1, F. Vakili 1, E. Aristidi 1 1 Laboratoire Universitaire d Astrophysique de Nice (LUAN) UMR 6525, France 2 Observatoire de la Côte d Azur, Laboratoire Gemini UMR 6203, France Abstract: The recent Dome C site testing shows its potential for interferometry. This article presents a part of discussion about the site characteristics measured by E. Aristidi et al. during the polar night. In section 2, the site characteristics are described. In section 3, the Mykerinos prototype interferometer is exposed. This instrument can be the first step before the implementation of future large Antarctic interferometers. It will allow characterizing the best instrument specifications, test technology in extreme conditions, and check the performances predicted for interferometer from Dome C. Its baseline and precision will allow studies of hot Jupiters with small apertures. 1 Introduction The Concordia base is located at Dome C at the altitude of 3300 meters. The weather of this site is exceptional: coldness and dryness; the temperature around -70 C during winter night, and only 5g per cm 2 per year of snow fall. These conditions are accompanied by a clear sky and a low atmospheric absorption. New site tests show that with 96% of clear days between February and May (data from E. Aristidi, 2005) this site is one of the clearest places on the Earth. The topography of the site is very interesting. The ground is practically horizontal over 100 kilometers. It is possible to build a 1 km baseline interferometer without heavy earthwork. Building stable structures on this area is made easier because of the low wind speed. The building of the Italian-French polar station Concordia started in 1999. It has been available for winter stay since last year. This allows new tests of the site characteristics with the DIMM experiment during the polar night. The results of these tests briefly mentioned in the next chapter are very promising for interferometry. We proposed a prototype interferometer Mikerinos, as a first step for large interferometer in Antarctica. We present the first studies of the performances of this prototype. 2 Site atmosphere characteristics The last site testing was carried out by E. Aristidi (E. Aristidi et al.,2005) thanks to 3 kinds of experiments: The first measurement method measures integrated optical disturbance with the DIMM and the telescopes GSM (Ziad et al., 2002). They measure the outer scale L 0, isoplanar angle θ 0, the JENAM2005 Distant Worlds : Technology Roadmap for Future Interferometric Facilities; 4-7 July 2005, Liège Belgium

Figure 1: Dome C location on Antarctica map Site Seeing (FWHM in ) Isoplanetic angle in Paranal 0.66 1.91 La Silla 0.87 1.25 Maidanak 0.70 2.47 South Pole 1.74 3.23 Dome C (summer) 0.54 6.8 Table 1: Seeing and Isoplanetic angle on different sites compared to Dome C during the summer. Winter season data are under analysis. coherence time τ 0, and the seeing quality r 0. These experiments show that Dome C (as shown the Table 1) has one of the best seeing on earth. Moreover it has a wide isoplanetic angle. This angle defines the maximal stars separation between the tracked star in an interferometer and studied star. If this angle is wide, finding a bright star for the fringe tracking is greatly relaxed. (Elhalkouj et al., IAUC, 2005) The second measurements were carried out in situ with balloons. These measurements give the refractive index structure constant C 2 n as a function of the altitude. This experiment (shown on the Figure 2) shows clearly that the ground layer is responsible for the largest part of the atmospheric turbulence (as exposed on the Table 2). This ground layer is limited to about 30 meters. It plays a fundamental role during winter session. (Aristidi et al.,2005) Above this level, the seeing is excellent. The r 0 value is twice better than at Paranal. The coherence time is around 9.6 ms wether is 3.3 ms at Paranal. This two parameters define the so called coherence volume, ie the number of photon per speckle per coherence time. That is to say they define the limit magnitude which allows the fringe tracking with an interferometer. This limit is proportional to r 2 0 times τ 0. Therefore limit magnitude at Dome C is between 2 and 4 mag over Paranal one. Parameters Dimm Balloons (10) Balloons (10) (March - May 2005) intergrated from 8m intergrated from 30m Seeing ( ) 1.0 1.2 0.4 τ 0 (ms) 6.8 9.6 θ 0 ( ) 3.3 3.6 3.2 Table 2: Seeing, τ 0 and θ 0 measured by the Dimm, and by the balloons, the balloon measures are integrated from 8 meters to 30 meters 472

Figure 2: Example of balloons measurement; the right curve is the Temperature as function of altitude, the middle curve is the refractive index structure constant C 2 n and the left curve is the seeing (integrated from the C 2 n). These graphics show a boundery layer limited to 40 m. The real challenge for Dome C is to find a way to get rid off the ground turbulence. Some solutions are studied at the LUAN like the use of towers, or the use of a ground layer adaptative optics system. 3 Interferometry projects As explained in the last section such atmospheric conditions are interesting for interferometers. Several projects aim to set up such large interferometers. One of them is KEOPS (for Kilo Parsec Explorer Optical Planets finder) project proposed by F. Vakili (LUAN). It will be composed by thirty six 1.5 meter telescopes arranged on 3 concentric rings. The first ring is composed by 6 telescopes and the rings diameter is 250 meters, the second ring is composed by 12 telescopes and its diameter is 600 meters. The last ring is composed 18 telescopes with a diameter of 1000 meters. It will allow high angular resolution needed for lot of astronomical challenges, specially direct detection of exo earths. But such instrument is perfect to study stellar surfaces, to make extragalactic and black holes observations, to make direct imaging and micro lenses. Finally it will be useful for the studies of the mechanisms of planets formation. Before building such interferometer the site should be properly characterized by a smaller interferometer. One prototype is studied at the LUAN: Mykerinos. This instrument should be able to work in extreme conditions. 3.1 Mykerinos specifications This interferometer is composed of three 40 cm telescopes. Its baseline ranges is between 100 and 400 meters. This size will first allow characterizing of the site with an interferometer and allow to have a sufficient angular resolution to make science. It will operate in phase closure mode, allowing precise measurements in the visible domain. The studies have proved that limiting 473

Planet Magnitude angular separation from their star (in ) star spectral type HD108147 7.003 0.003 F8/G0 V HD86 6.17 0.01 K1 V Table 3: candidate planets detectable by the Mykerinos interferometer magnitude for fringe tracking (cf Figure 3) and noise level should allow the observations and characterizations of several hot Jupiter. (Table 3) 3.2 Mykerinos challenges Mykerinos is the first step before the creation of large Antarctica interferometers like KEOPS. Technology tests will be done with this small interferometer in order to validate the technologies for KEOPS. Mykerinos should be able to work in the Antarctica extreme conditions. Its size should allow it to be easily transportable in Antarctica. Precise visibility measurements are possible thanks to its large base line. The telescopes will be placed on individual towers to get rid off the ground turbulence layer. 3.3 Mykerinos science goal Better than just a technology demonstrator and a site testing instrument, Mykerinos should be able to measure interesting stellar parameters. Its angular resolution allow to measure star diameters, rotation, darkening and aplanatism. More over the thermal atmospheric emission simulations show that at least two hot Jupiter could be detected (and the color of their atmospheres studied) with this a 40cm telescopes interferometer. The thermal emission of the Earth s atmosphere was simulated thanks to a black corps emitting at -70 Celsius. This simulation includes the atmosphere thermal emission, the photon noise and the read out noise. The Figure 3 shows the limits magnitude to track the fringe pattern with a signal to noise ratio equal to 1, a exposure time of 10 ms, and 40 cm telescope diameter. This result shows that at least two hot Jupiter are detectable with this instrument (see Table 3). Figure 3: Limiting magnitude for fringe tracking with a signal to noise ration equal to 1, telescope diameter equal to 40 cm and τ 0 equal to 10 ms. (average conditions at 30 m) 474

4 Conclusions The Dome C site is one of the most promising site to set up large interferometers. The atmospheric conditions and the free area are perfect for a large interferometer. In order to achieve the characterization of the site, the LUAN is building the Mykerinos interferometer prototype. This instrument will be needed to validate the technology for the next Antarctica interferometer generation. It will measure the isopistonic angle, and will already be of interest to study some hot Jupiters and bright exo zodiacal lights. References A. Agabi, E. Aristidi, 2005, this proceeding E. Aristidi, A. Agabi, E. Fossat et al., 2005a, A&A, in press E. Aristidi, M. Azouit et al., 2005b, A&A, 430, 739 F. Vakili, E. Aristidi et al., 2004, A&A, 421 F. Vakili, A. Belu et al., 2004, SPIE, 5491 T. Elhalkouj et al., 2005, IAUC, in press A. Ziad et al., 2002, NRAS, 362 T. Fusco et al., 2004, SPIE, 5490 475