Gravitational deformation after the April 6, 2009 L Aquila Earthquake detected by Cosmo-SkyMed

Similar documents
The April 6 th 2009, L Aquila (Italy) earthquake: DInSAR analysis and seismic source model inversion

Source identification for situational awareness of the August 24 th 2016 Central Italy event

Monitoring long-term ground movements and Deep Seated Gravitational

INGV. Giuseppe Pezzo. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, CNT, Roma. Sessione 1.1: Terremoti e le loro faglie

Ground surface deformation of L Aquila. earthquake revealed by InSAR time series

Minor shallow gravitational component on the Mt. Vettore surface ruptures related to M W 6, 2016 Amatrice earthquake

6.0 TDMT, M W. IREA-CNR, Napoli, Italy 2. DISPUTER, Università G. D Annunzio, Chieti, Italy 3. Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Roma, Italy

The March 11, 2011, Tohoku-oki earthquake (Japan): surface displacement and source modelling

Dottorato in Scienze della Terra, dell Ambiente e delle Risorse, Università Federico II, Napoli, Italy 2

Ground deformation in Thessaly, Central Greece, between 1992 and 2000 by means of ERS multi-temporal InSAR

Earthquake and Volcano Deformation

POSTSEISMIC DEFORMATION IN SOUTH ICELAND STUDIED USING MULTIPLE ACQUISTION RADAR INTERFEROMETRY

Abruzzo, Italy, Earthquakes of April 2009: Heterogeneous Fault-Slip Models and Stress Transfer from Accurate Inversion of ENVISAT-InSAR Data

Can geodetic strain rate be useful in seismic hazard studies?

Geodetic model of the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence inferred from InSAR and GPS data

Activation of the SIGRIS monitoring system for ground deformation mapping during the Emilia 2012 seismic sequence, using COSMO-SkyMed InSAR data

G. Pezzo, C. Tolomei, S. Atzori, S. Salvi, J.P. Merryman Boncori Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, CNT, Roma, Italy

Earthquake and Volcano Service

Afterslip, slow earthquakes and aftershocks: Modeling using the rate & state friction law

Elizabeth H. Hearn modified from W. Behr

DETECTION OF CRUSTAL MOVEMENTS FOR THE 2011 TOHOKU, JAPAN EARTHQUAKE FROM MULTI-TEMPORAL HIGH- RESOLUTION SAR INTENSITY IMAGES

TRANSITION CRUSTAL ZONE VS MANTLE RELAXATION: POSTSEISMIC DEFORMATIONS FOR SHALLOW NORMAL FAULTING EARTHQUAKES

Ground displacement in a fault zone in the presence of asperities

Earthquakes. Earthquake Magnitudes 10/1/2013. Environmental Geology Chapter 8 Earthquakes and Related Phenomena

Regional Geodesy. Shimon Wdowinski. MARGINS-RCL Workshop Lithospheric Rupture in the Gulf of California Salton Trough Region. University of Miami

Elastic Rebound Theory

Seismic Sequences Branching Structures: Long-Range Interactions and Hazard Levels

to: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San

On the earthquake predictability of fault interaction models

Earthquakes Chapter 19

Zoning surface rupture hazard along normal faults: insight from the 2009 M w 6.3 L Aquila, central Italy, earthquake and other global earthquakes

GSA DATA REPOSITORY

Lab 9: Satellite Geodesy (35 points)

The Earthquake Cycle Chapter :: n/a

Elementary seismological analysis applied to the April 6, 2009 L'Aquila mainshock and its larger aftershock

Crustal deformation by the Southeast-off Kii Peninsula Earthquake

Deformation cycles of great subduction earthquakes in a viscoelastic Earth

Q1-Q CEOS Seismic Pilot report. CEOS Thematic Pilots

DETECTION OF CRUSTAL MOVEMENTS IN THE 2011 TOHOKU, JAPAN EARTHQUAKE USING HIGH-RESOLUTION SAR DATA

Rheology III. Ideal materials Laboratory tests Power-law creep The strength of the lithosphere The role of micromechanical defects in power-law creep

Geodesy (InSAR, GPS, Gravity) and Big Earthquakes

Castaldo R. (1) De Novellis V. (1) Lollino P. (2) Manunta M. (1) Tizzani P. (1) 1: IREA-CNR, Napoli, Italy. 2: IRPI-CNR, Bari, Italy.

Earthquakes and Earthquake Hazards Earth - Chapter 11 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

What We Know (and don t know)

Earthquake. What is it? Can we predict it?

PLATE DEFORMATION - 2

Case study of Japan: Reference Frames in Practice

Time Dependence of Postseismic Creep Following Two Strike-Slip Earthquakes. Gerasimos Michalitsianos

Strong foreshock signal preceding the L Aquila (Italy) earthquake (M w 6.3) of 6 April 2009

Earthquakes and Faulting

Introduction: Advancing Simulations of Sequences of Earthquakes and Aseismic Slip (SEAS)

Supplementary Information to: Shallow slip amplification and enhanced tsunami. hazard unravelled by dynamic simulations of mega-thrust earthquakes

Geophysical Journal International

Post-seismic motion following the 1997 Manyi (Tibet) earthquake: InSAR observations and modelling

Ground Surface Deformation of L Aquila Earthquake Revealed by. InSAR Time Series

The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting

Two ways to think about the dynamics of earthquake ruptures

Journal of Geophysical Research Letters Supporting Information for

Afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation following the 1999 M 7.4 İzmit earthquake from GPS measurements

3D temporal evolution of displacements recorded on Mt. Etna from the 2007 to 2010 through the SISTEM method

Rupture history of the 1997 Umbria-Marche (Central Italy) main shocks from the inversion of GPS, DInSAR and near field strong motion data

Rotation of the Principal Stress Directions Due to Earthquake Faulting and Its Seismological Implications

Development of a Predictive Simulation System for Crustal Activities in and around Japan - II

1 Introduction. 1.1 Aims. 1.2 Rock fractures

Gets Boost from a New Satellite

The Effect of Elastic Layering on Inversions of GPS Data for Coseismic Slip and Resulting Stress Changes: Strike-Slip Earthquakes

NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE Segmented Faulting Process of Chelungpu Thrust: Implication of SAR Interferograms

INVESTIGATION OF EARTHQUAKE-CYCLE DEFORMATION IN TIBET FROM ALOS PALSAR DATA PI 168 Roland Bürgmann 1, Mong-Han Huang 1, Isabelle Ryder 2, and Eric Fi

Far-reaching transient motions after Mojave earthquakes require broad mantle flow beneath a strong crust

Coseismic effects of the 2016 Amatrice seismic sequence: first geological results

Geometry of co-seismic surface ruptures and tectonic meaning of the 23 October 2011 Mw 7.1 Van earthquake (East Anatolian Region, Turkey)

Warm-up #15. How does magma move throughout the mantle? What is another example of this movement in nature?

ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 59, Fast Track 5, 2016; DOI: /ag-7215

Separating Tectonic, Magmatic, Hydrological, and Landslide Signals in GPS Measurements near Lake Tahoe, Nevada-California

Introduction The major accomplishment of this project is the development of a new method to identify earthquake sequences. This method differs from

Case Study of Japan: Crustal deformation monitoring with GNSS and InSAR

The August 24 th 2016 Accumoli earthquake: surface faulting and Deep- Seated Gravitational Slope Deformation (DSGSD) in the Monte Vettore area

Buried Strike Slip Faults: The 1994 and 2004 Al Hoceima, Morocco Earthquakes.

Earthquakes. Chapter Test A. Multiple Choice. Write the letter of the correct answer on the line at the left.

Earthquakes. Building Earth s Surface, Part 2. Science 330 Summer What is an earthquake?

Surface changes caused by erosion and sedimentation were treated by solving: (2)

KUMAMOTO EARTHQUAKE (review)

Co-seismic Gravity Changes Computed for a Spherical Earth Model Applicable to GRACE Data

Title: Three-dimensional mechanical models for the June 2000 earthquake sequence in the South Icelandic Seismic Zone

Dynamic Earthquake Triggering Due to Stress from Surface Wave Particle Displacement

Shattering a plate boundary: the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake

Journal of Geophysical Research - Solid Earth

Three-dimensional numerical simulation on the coseismic deformation of the 2008 M S 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake in China

Data Repository Hampel et al., page 1/5

Predicted reversal and recovery of surface creep on the Hayward fault following the 1906 San Francisco earthquake

High-Harmonic Geoid Signatures due to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment, Subduction and Seismic Deformation

Homogeneous vs. realistic heterogeneous material-properties in subduction zone models: Coseismic and postseismic deformation

} based on composition

Lecture # 6. Geological Structures

) repeatedly occurred along fault segments of the Timpe system (Azzaro et al., 2012b).

(First Edition: prepared on 29/12/2003)

Earth Science, (Tarbuck/Lutgens) Chapter 10: Mountain Building

Oceanic Transform Fault Seismicity Earthquakes of a Different Kind

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise

Clock Advance in Earthquake Triggering of Volcanic Eruptions

Transcription:

Gravitational deformation after the April 6, 2009 L Aquila Earthquake detected by Cosmo-SkyMed Christian Bignami 1 ; Matteo Albano 1 ; Salvatore Barba 1 ; Mario Costantini 2 ; Fabio Malvarosa 2 ; Marco Moro 1 ; Michele Saroli 3 ; Salvatore Stramondo 1 1: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy. 2: E-GEOS S.p.A., Rome, Italy. 3: DICeM Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Meccanica - University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino (FR), Italy.

Contents L Aquila earthquake Previous studies Earthquake-related deformation InSAR data COSMO-SkyMed dataset Postseismic deformation Numerical modelling Results Conclusions

L Aquila earthquake On April 6th, 2009, a normal faulting earthquake of M w 6.3 hit the central Apennines, provoking severe damages to the city of L Aquila and neighbouring villages. The mainshock nucleated at a depth of about 9 km, 4 km southwest of the city of L Aquila, dislocating the Paganica Fault (PF). The mainshock was preceded by foreshocks up to M w 4.3 and followed by a 3-year-long aftershock sequence, more than 80 thousands events among which seven with M w >5. April 6,2009 Mw 6,1

Previous studies Coseismic deformations GPS; InSAR (Anzidei et al, 2009; Serpelloni et al, 2012; Atzori et al., 2009; Trasatti et al., 2011; Volpe et al., 2012) Analytical models Numerical models (FEM) Postseismic deformations Atzori et al., 2009 GPS; InSAR; levelling (D Agostino et al., 2009; Cheloni et al., 2010; D Agostino et al., 2012; Gualandi et al., 2014; Cheloni et al., 2014) Max timespan = 10 months Analytical models Prevalent tectonic origin D Agostino et al., 2012

Earthquake-related deformations Pollitz et al., 2001 1) Slip on or contiguous to the mainshock rupture 3) Poro-elastic rebound due to pore-fluid flow Cheloni et al., 2014 2) Visco-elastic relaxation in the lower crust and upper mantle Lacroix et al., 2011 Jònsson et al., 2003 4) Surficial deformations on areas with high energy relief

Earthquake-related deformations Surficial deformations on areas with high energy relief Coseismic deformation L Aquila earthquake (Moro et al, 2011) Postseismic deformation Surficial deformations, triggered by the earthquake, but driven by gravity

InSAR dataset COSMO-SkyMed Persistent Scatterer Pair technique (PSP) (Costantini et al., 2008, 2013, 2014) Timespan 16 months (April 12, 2009 August 6, 2010) Images 35 Sensor X band @ 9.6 Ghz Mode Stripmap Resolution 3 m per pixel Orbit Ascending Incidence angle 40

Postseismic deformation Displacement field at August 6, 2010 Shallow afterslip of the PF

Postseismic deformation Displacement field at August 6, 2010 Section A Section B Convexity over Mt. Ocre ridge

Postseismic deformation Displacement field at August 6, 2010 Double crest Limestone Flysch Gravitational deformation (Salvi & Nardi, 1995; Salvi et al., 2003) Reactivation after the earthquake

Numerical modelling Finite element models Section A Section B Displacement mainly directed orthogonally to the ridge axis

Numerical modelling Homogeneous isotropic material Constitutive model Linear elastic (ELA) Linear elastic perfectly plastic (PLA) Modelling phases PF 1) Gravity load In-situ stresses 2) Coseismic (t=0) Istantaneous downward movement (cm) Coseismic displacement profile 3) Postseismic (t=16 months) Constant velocity downward movement (mm/year) Postseismic displacement time series

Results Ocre ridge 1 2 Section A Cosesismic displacement profile Point 1 Postseismic displacement profile (August 6, 2010) Point 2

Results Ocre ridge 1 2 3 Section B Point 1 Cosesismic displacement profile Point 2 Postseismic displacement profile (August 6, 2010) Point 3

Results Postseismic resultant displacements (August 6, 2010)

Conclusions We investigated the postseismic effects of the April 6, L Aquila earthquake by numerical modelling and InSAR data. We observed that the elasto-plastic behaviour of the material satisfactorily describes the observed displacements The change in the coseismic stress and geometry destabilized the Mt. Ocre ridge, causing an excess of displacements with respect to the L Aquila plain To analyse InSAR data on descending orbit To implement a nonlinear afterslip

Conclusions