On Huntsberger Type Shrinkage Estimator for the Mean of Normal Distribution ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
Bootstrap Method > # Purpose: understand how bootstrap method works > obs=c(11.96, 5.03, 67.40, 16.07, 31.50, 7.73, 11.10, 22.38) > n=length(obs) >

CHAPTER 4 DIAGNOSTICS FOR INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

SIZE BIAS IN LINE TRANSECT SAMPLING: A FIELD TEST. Mark C. Otto Statistics Research Division, Bureau of the Census Washington, D.C , U.S.A.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL GaGa: a simple and flexible hierarchical model for microarray data analysis

Math Foundations 20 Work Plan

UNIV1"'RSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA Department of Statistics Chapel Hill, N. C. CUMULATIVE SUM CONTROL CHARTS FOR THE FOLDED NORMAL DISTRIBUTION

Lead/Lag Compensator Frequency Domain Properties and Design Methods

Performance Bounds for Detect and Avoid Signal Sensing

Pressure And Entropy Variations Across The Weak Shock Wave Due To Viscosity Effects

A mathematical model for complete stress-strain curve prediction of permeable concrete

Admissibility Conditions and Asymptotic Behavior of Strongly Regular Graphs

Comparing Several Means: ANOVA. Group Means and Grand Mean

, which yields. where z1. and z2

Module 4: General Formulation of Electric Circuit Theory

Perfrmance f Sensitizing Rules n Shewhart Cntrl Charts with Autcrrelated Data Key Wrds: Autregressive, Mving Average, Runs Tests, Shewhart Cntrl Chart

Least Squares Optimal Filtering with Multirate Observations

ON-LINE PROCEDURE FOR TERMINATING AN ACCELERATED DEGRADATION TEST

Computational modeling techniques

MATCHING TECHNIQUES. Technical Track Session VI. Emanuela Galasso. The World Bank

Modelling of Clock Behaviour. Don Percival. Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington Seattle, Washington, USA

Computational modeling techniques

Marginal Conceptual Predictive Statistic for Mixed Model Selection

Enhancing Performance of MLP/RBF Neural Classifiers via an Multivariate Data Distribution Scheme

Methods for Determination of Mean Speckle Size in Simulated Speckle Pattern

APPLICATION OF THE BRATSETH SCHEME FOR HIGH LATITUDE INTERMITTENT DATA ASSIMILATION USING THE PSU/NCAR MM5 MESOSCALE MODEL

Internal vs. external validity. External validity. This section is based on Stock and Watson s Chapter 9.

A NOTE ON BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF THE. University of Oxford. and. A. C. Davison. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. March 10, 1998.

CAUSAL INFERENCE. Technical Track Session I. Phillippe Leite. The World Bank

Modeling the Nonlinear Rheological Behavior of Materials with a Hyper-Exponential Type Function

7 TH GRADE MATH STANDARDS

The blessing of dimensionality for kernel methods

David HORN and Irit OPHER. School of Physics and Astronomy. Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences

IN a recent article, Geary [1972] discussed the merit of taking first differences

MATCHING TECHNIQUES Technical Track Session VI Céline Ferré The World Bank

I. Analytical Potential and Field of a Uniform Rod. V E d. The definition of electric potential difference is

CHAPTER 24: INFERENCE IN REGRESSION. Chapter 24: Make inferences about the population from which the sample data came.

initially lcated away frm the data set never win the cmpetitin, resulting in a nnptimal nal cdebk, [2] [3] [4] and [5]. Khnen's Self Organizing Featur

A Matrix Representation of Panel Data

Eric Klein and Ning Sa

Theoretical study of third virial coefficient with Kihara potential

AP Statistics Notes Unit Two: The Normal Distributions

Sequential Allocation with Minimal Switching

the results to larger systems due to prop'erties of the projection algorithm. First, the number of hidden nodes must

A Regression Solution to the Problem of Criterion Score Comparability

Free Vibrations of Catenary Risers with Internal Fluid

ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR PREDICTING STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOUR OF BACTERIAL CONCRETE

Revision: August 19, E Main Suite D Pullman, WA (509) Voice and Fax

Resampling Methods. Chapter 5. Chapter 5 1 / 52

3. Design of Channels General Definition of some terms CHAPTER THREE

3D FE Modeling Simulation of Cold Rotary Forging with Double Symmetry Rolls X. H. Han 1, a, L. Hua 1, b, Y. M. Zhao 1, c

On Boussinesq's problem

Modelling Record Times in Sport with Extreme Value Methods

BOUNDED UNCERTAINTY AND CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS. Christopher Costello, Andrew Solow, Michael Neubert, and Stephen Polasky

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT OF OUTFLOW OPENING FOR PREDICTING CROSS-VENTILATION FLOW RATE

Advanced Heat and Mass Transfer by Amir Faghri, Yuwen Zhang, and John R. Howell

NUROP CONGRESS PAPER CHINESE PINYIN TO CHINESE CHARACTER CONVERSION

Aerodynamic Separability in Tip Speed Ratio and Separability in Wind Speed- a Comparison

BASD HIGH SCHOOL FORMAL LAB REPORT

^YawataR&D Laboratory, Nippon Steel Corporation, Tobata, Kitakyushu, Japan

A NOTE ON THE EQUIVAImCE OF SOME TEST CRITERIA. v. P. Bhapkar. University of Horth Carolina. and

Analysis of Curved Bridges Crossing Fault Rupture Zones

ON THE COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN METHODS FOR IMPROOVING THE GEAR TRANSMISSION PERFORMANCES

Hypothesis Tests for One Population Mean

COASTAL ENGINEERING Chapter 2

Determining the Accuracy of Modal Parameter Estimation Methods

February 28, 2013 COMMENTS ON DIFFUSION, DIFFUSIVITY AND DERIVATION OF HYPERBOLIC EQUATIONS DESCRIBING THE DIFFUSION PHENOMENA

Broadcast Program Generation for Unordered Queries with Data Replication

Lecture 2: Supervised vs. unsupervised learning, bias-variance tradeoff

Group Report Lincoln Laboratory. The Angular Resolution of Multiple Target. J. R. Sklar F. C. Schweppe. January 1964

ROUNDING ERRORS IN BEAM-TRACKING CALCULATIONS

Chapter 3: Cluster Analysis

Comparison of two variable parameter Muskingum methods

SAMPLING DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS

Zeros of Sections of the Zeta Function. I

Differentiation Applications 1: Related Rates

Analysis on the Stability of Reservoir Soil Slope Based on Fuzzy Artificial Neural Network

OF SIMPLY SUPPORTED PLYWOOD PLATES UNDER COMBINED EDGEWISE BENDING AND COMPRESSION

On Out-of-Sample Statistics for Financial Time-Series

3D KMC simulation on the precipitation in the annealed ternary alloy system

MATHEMATICS SYLLABUS SECONDARY 5th YEAR

A Correlation of. to the. South Carolina Academic Standards for Mathematics Precalculus

Lecture 2: Supervised vs. unsupervised learning, bias-variance tradeoff

5.4 Measurement Sampling Rates for Daily Maximum and Minimum Temperatures

Interference is when two (or more) sets of waves meet and combine to produce a new pattern.

1996 Engineering Systems Design and Analysis Conference, Montpellier, France, July 1-4, 1996, Vol. 7, pp

A Study on Pullout Strength of Cast-in-place Anchor bolt in Concrete under High Temperature

Assessing bandwidth selectors with visual error criteria

ENSC Discrete Time Systems. Project Outline. Semester

Tree Structured Classifier

Snow avalanche runout from two Canadian mountain ranges

SOLUTION OF THREE-CONSTRAINT ENTROPY-BASED VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION

Contributions to the Theory of Robust Inference

Margin Distribution and Learning Algorithms

Engineering Approach to Modelling Metal THz Structures

Homology groups of disks with holes

PSU GISPOPSCI June 2011 Ordinary Least Squares & Spatial Linear Regression in GeoDa

Verification of Quality Parameters of a Solar Panel and Modification in Formulae of its Series Resistance

N umerical analyses such as the finite element method

22.54 Neutron Interactions and Applications (Spring 2004) Chapter 11 (3/11/04) Neutron Diffusion

AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE API RP 581 RISK BASED INSPECTION BASE RESOURCE DOCUMENT BALLOT COVER PAGE

Transcription:

Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences 4(): 7-4 () On Huntsberger Type Shrinkage Estimatr fr the Mean f Nrmal Distributin Department f Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University f Nizwa, Sultanate f Oman E-mail: alhemyari@unizwa.edu.m; drzuhair@yah.cm ABSTRACT The present article deals with an imprved estimatr f nrmal mean which is btained by cnsidering single stage prcedure with apprpriate shrinkage weight functin. Indeed tw shrunken testimatrs f Huntsberger-type are prpsed fr the mean µ f nrmal distributin when a prir estimate µ f the mean µ is available. The gdness f this prcedure as a means f maximizing the relative efficiency is explained in this paper. The expressins fr the bias mean squared errr and relative efficiency f the prpsed testimatrs are derived. The perfrmances f the prpsed testimatrs are cmpared with classical and existing testimatrs based n the criteria f biased rati and relative efficiency t search fr a better estimatr. Keywrds: Nrmal distributin; Huntsberger-type shrinkage testimatr; Preliminary test; Bias rati; Relative efficiency. The mdel INTRODUCTION The nrmal distributin plays an imprtant rle in bth the applicatin and inferential statistics. In mdeling applicatins, the nrmal curve is an excellent apprximatin t the frequency distributins f bservatins taken n a variety f variables and as a limiting frm f varius ther distributins (Davisn, (3)). Many psychlgical measurements and physical phenmena can be apprximated well by the nrmal distributin. In additin, there are many applicatins f the nrmal distributin in engineering. One applicatin deals with analysis f items which exhibit failure due t wear, such as mechanical devices. Other applicatins are, the analysis f the variatin f cmpnent dimensins in manufacturing, mdeling glbal irradiatin data, and the intensity f laser light, and s n. Indeed the wide applicatin and ccurrence f the nrmal distributin in life testing and reliability prblems are a wnder. In the cntext f reliability prblems and life testing, a number f failure time data have been examined (Bain and Engelharadt, (99)) and it was shwn that the nrmal distributin give quite a gd fit fr the mst cases.

Incrprating a guess value, and PSE In many prblems, the experimenter has sme prir infrmatin regarding the value f µ either due t past experiences r t his familiarity with the behavir f the ppulatin. Hwever, in certain situatins the prir infrmatin is available nly in the frm f an initial guess value (natural rigin) µ f µ. In such a situatin it is natural t start with an estimatr X f µ and mdify it by mving it clser t µ, s that the resulting estimatr, thugh perhaps biased, has smaller mean squared errr than that f X in sme interval arund µ. This methd f cnstructing an estimatr f µ that incrprates the prir infrmatin µ leads t what is knwn as a shrunken estimatr. Cnsider the Huntsberger, (955) type shrinkage estimatr ɶ µ = { ψ ( X )( X µ ) + µ }, () ϕ where ψ ( X )( ψ ( X ) ), represents a weighting functin specifying the degree f belief in µ. A number f authrs (Gdman, (953), Thmpsn, (968a), Arnld, (969) and Mehta and Srinivasan, (97)) have tried t develp new s shrinkage estimatrs f the frm () fr special ppulatins by chsing different weight functins. The relevance f such types f shrinkage estimatrs lies in the fact that, thugh perhaps they are biased, have smaller MSE than X in sme interval arund µ. Shrinkage estimatrs f the frm () have the disadvantage that it necessarily uses the prir value in the cnstructin f final estimatrs. Hwever, it is nt necessary that the prir value is clse t true value. T emply this idea in estimatin f the mean µ, a preliminary test is first cnducted t check the clseness f µ t µ befre using it in a shrinkage estimatr. Define ϕ ( X), if H : µ = µ, ψ( X) =, if H : µ µ, () where ϕ( X ). Thus, the preliminary shrinkage estimatr (PSE) f µ crrespnding t ψ ( X ) is given by, ˆ µ = {[ ϕ ( X )( X µ ) + µ ] I + [ X ] I }, (3) R R 8 Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences

where I R and On Huntsberger Type Shrinkage Estimatr fr the Mean f Nrmal Distributin I are respectively the indicatr functins f the acceptance R regin R and the rejectin regin R. A number f ther authrs (Thmpsn, (968a, 968b), Davis and Arnld, (97), Hiran, (977), Kamb et al., (99), Singh et al., (4), Singh and Saxena, (5), Lemmer, (6), Al-Hemyari et al., (9b), Al-Hemyari, (9a, )) have tried t develp new shrinkage estimatrs f the frm (3) fr special ppulatins by chsing different weight functins and R. In this paper tw preliminary shrinkage estimatrs f Huntsberger-type fr the mean µ f nrmal distributin N ( µ, σ ) when σ is knwn r unknwn are prpsed, and the expressins fr the bias, mean squared errr, and relative efficiency are derived and studied numerically. The discussin regarding the cmparisns with the earlier knwn results are made and the usefulness f these testimatrs under different situatins is prvided as cnclusins frm varius numerical tables btained frm simulatin results. TESTIMATOR µɶ AND ITS PROPERTIES WITH KNOWN σ Let X be nrmally distributed with unknwn µ and knwn variance σ. Assume that a prir estimate past. The first prpsed testimatr is, ɶ µ = {[ X ae n b( X ) / µ σ ( X µ )] I R +[ X ] µ abut µ is available frm the I R }. (4) Fr this testimatr we cnsidered R as the cmmnly used acceptance regin f the hypthesis H : θ = θ against the alternative H : θ θ. If α is the level f significance f the test, then the preliminary test regin R is given by R = { X : T ( X ) [ L, U ]}, (5) α / α / where l α / and U α / are the lwer and upper (α /) percentile pints f the statistic T( X ) used fr testing the abve hypthesis. If the standard nrmal statistic T( X ) is used, the regin R is given by: σ σ [ ( n b X µ ) / σ R } = [ µ zα /, µ + zα / ], ϕ( X ) = [ a e ], (6) n n Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences 9

b, a, and z α / is the upper ( α / ) percentile pint f the standard nrmal distributin. The bias expressin f ~µ is defined by, B( ɶ µ µ ) = E( ɶ µ ) µ R nb( X µ ) / σ µ µ µ σ = (( ae )( X ) + ) f ( X /, ) d X + X f ( X / µ, σ ) d X µ, R (7) where R is the rejectin regin and f ( X µ, σ ) is the p.d.f. f X. Simple calculatins lead t bλ /(b+ ) σ ae B( ɶ µ µ, R ) = ( ) [ b + J 3/ ( a, b ) + λ J ( a, b )]. (8) n (b + ) The mean squared errr expressin f ~µ is defined by, MSE( ɶ µ µ, R ) E( ɶ µ µ ) (( ae )( X µ ) µ µ ) nb( X µ ) / σ = = + R f X d X X f X d X ( / µ, σ ) + ( µ ) ( / µ, σ ). R (9) After sme algebraic manipulatins, it can be easily shwn that σ 5 / bλ /(b+ ) MSE ( ɶ µ µ, R ) = a(b + ) e [ (b + ) J ( a, b ) n + λ ( b) b + J ( a, b ) bλ J ( a, b ) + a (4b + ) e 5 / ] bλ /(4b+ ) x (4b + ) J ( a3, b3 ) + λ 4b + J ( a3, b 3) + λ J ( a3, b3 )], () where a = λ z, b = λ + z, a = ( λ z )/ b +, b = ( λ + z )/ b +, α / α / α / α / a = ( λ z )/ 4b, b = ( λ + z )/ 4b, λ = n( µ µ )/ σ, 3 α / 3 α / 3 Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences

and On Huntsberger Type Shrinkage Estimatr fr the Mean f Nrmal Distributin b j i y / Ji( aj, bj) = y e dy, i =,,, j =,. π aj Fr numerical cmputatins we may use the relatins: ( ) J( a, b) = exp( a ) exp( b ) π, () and ( ) J ( a, b) = J ( a, b) + exp( a ) exp( b ) π. () Remark : Chice f a It seems reasnable t select a that minimizes the MSE ( ɶ µ µ ). Setting ( / a) MSE ( ɶ µ µ ) ) t zer, we get, ( ( ) 5 / bλ /(b+ )(4b+ ) a = a = (4b + ) /(b + ) e {[(b + ) J ( a, b ) + λ ( b) b + J ( a, b ) bλ J ( a, b )]/[(4b + ) J ( a, b ) + λ 4b + J ( a, b ) 3 3 3 3 3 3 + λ J ( a, b )]} (3) Since MSE ( ɶ µ µ ) = a σ 5/ bλ /(4b+ ) (4b + ) e (4b + ) J ( a3, b3 ) + λ 4b + J ( a3, b3) + λ J ( a3, b3 ) ], n it fllws that the minimizing value f a [,] is given by: if a, aɶ = a if a, (4) if a. The efficiency f ~µ relative t X is defined by, Eff ( ɶ µ µ ) = σ / MSE ( ɶ µ µ ). (5) Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences 3

Remark : Sme prperties. It is easily seen that B ( ɶ µ µ ) is an dd functin f λ, whereas E( n µɶ ), MSE ( ɶ µ µ ) and Eff ( ɶ µ µ ) are all even functins f λ. Als Eff ( ɶ µ µ ) = as λ ±. Since lim B ( ɶ µ µ ) =, and lim MSE ( ɶ µ µ ) =, µɶ is a asympttically n n unbiased and cnsistent estimatr f µ. Als µɶ dminates X in large n and n in the sense that lim [ MSE ( ɶ µ µ ) MSE ( X)]. n Remark 3: Special cases. It may be nted here, when ϕ ( X ) = c, c is cnstant the equatins (8), () & (5) agree with the result f Thmpsn, (968a); when the hypthesis H : µ = µ is accepted with prbability ne the same expressin aggress with the result f Mehta and Srinivasan, (97); als when a =, the same expressin aggress with the result f Hiran, (977), and when ϕ ( X ) = c, c, if X R and ϕ ( X ) = c, if X R, the result agrees with the result f Al-Hemyari et al., (9b). When TESTIMATOR µɶ WITH σ UNKNOWN σ is unknwn, it is estimated by n i i= s = ( X X ) /( n ). Again taking regin R as the pretest regin f size α fr testing H : µ = µ against H : µ µ in the testimatr µɶ defined in (3) and denting the resulting estimatr as µɶ. The testimatr µɶ emplys the interval R given by, R = µ tα /, n s / n, µ + tα /, n s / n, (6) where t α /, n is the upper ( α / ) percentile pint f the t distributin with n degrees f freedm. The expressins fr bias and MSE and are given respectively by: 3 Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences

On Huntsberger Type Shrinkage Estimatr fr the Mean f Nrmal Distributin bλ /(b ) σ + ae * * * * B( ɶ µ µ ) = [ b + J 3/ ( a, b ) + λ J( a, b )] f ( s σ ) ds (7) n (b + ) MSE ( ɶ µ µ ) = σ n { a(b + ) e [(b + ) J ( a, b ) + λ ( b) b + J ( a, b ) 5/ bλ /(b+ ) * * * * 5/ bλ /(4b+ ) * * * * 3 3 λ 3 3 bλ J ( a, b )] + a (4b + ) e [(4b + ) J ( a, b ) + 4b + J ( a, b ) + λ J ( a, b )]} f ( s σ ) ds, * * 3 3 where * s * s * a3 = ( λ tα /, n )/ 4b +, b3 = ( λ + tα /, n )/ 4b +, a = ( λ tα /, n x σ σ s * s * s * x )/ b +, b = ( λ + tα /, n )/ b +, a = λ tα /, n, b = λ + tα /, n, σ σ σ and f ( s σ ) is the p. d.f. f s. If µ = µ, the abve expressins reduce t: B ( ɶ µ µ ) =, (9) [ σ a a MSE( ɶ µ µ, R ) = + ( α)[ ] 4 a t 3/ 3/ α /, n Γ( n / ) / n (b + ) (4b + ) t α /, n (4b + ) n / n [ n π ( n ) Γ(( n ) / ) x x( + ) ] + a tα /, n Γ / n n / n tα /, n (4b + ) π ( n ) Γ (4b + ) + }. n Remark 4: Chice f a Prceeding in the manner as in last sectin, we get the minimizing value f a as fllws, ( α ) a a t b + [ 3 α n ( ) n = =, Γ ( + t α, n ( b + ) x x( n ) n ) ]] n [ π ( n ) Γ ( b + ) ( α ) ( 4b + ) [ ( n ) Γ ( b + ) x x + t ( b + ) n + t 3 α, n Γ ( α, n ( n )) / n [( π 4 4 n ]] () Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences 33

Since σ ( α) n n MSE ( ɶ µ, Y µ R ) = + 4 t 3/ α /, n Γ /[ π( n ) Γ (4b + ) a n (4b + ) n / tα /, n (4b + ) + } >, () n it fllws that the minimizing value f a [,] is given by: if a aɶ = a if a () if a The relative efficiency f µɶ defined by, Eff ( ɶ µ µ ) = σ / MSE( ɶ µ µ ). (3) SIMULATION AND NUMERICAL RESULTS T bserve the behavir f the prpsed testimatrs, and t give useful cmparisn between the prpsed, classical, and existing estimatrs, the cmputatins f relative efficiency, bias rati, were dne fr the testimatrs µɶ and µɶ. Specifically, fr testimatr ~µ these cmputatins were dne fr α =.,.,.5,.,.5, b =.,.,., and λ =.(.) 4, whereas fr µɶ this was dne fr α =.,.,.5, b =.,., n = 4(4) and in rder t cmpare ur testimatrs µɶ and µɶ with thse f Al-Hemyari et al.,(9), Saxena and Singh, (6), Kamb et al., (99), Hiran, (977), Davis and Arnld, (97), Arnld, (969) and Thmpsn, (968a). Sme f these cmputatins are given in Tables t 3. We make the fllwing bservatins frm tables f cmputatins presented in this paper: i) The testimatr µɶ is biased (see Table ). The bias rati is reasnably small if the prir pint estimate µ desn t deviate t much frm the true value µ. 34 Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences

On Huntsberger Type Shrinkage Estimatr fr the Mean f Nrmal Distributin ii) It is bserved that, fr λ 3, µɶ has smaller mean squared errr than the classical estimatr X. Thus µɶ may be used t imprve the efficiency if λ belng t the regin λ 3. iii) Fr fixed n and α, the relative efficiency f µɶ is increases with decreasing value f b. iv) As expected ur cmputatins (see Table ) shwed that the relative efficiency f µɶ decreases with size α f the pretest regin, i.e. α =. gives higher relative efficiency than fr ther values f α. v) Fr fixed b, and α, the relative efficiency f ~µ is maximum when λ, and decreases with increasing value f λ. v) Fr any fixed α and b, the relative efficiency is a decreasing functin f n when λ. xi) The behaviural pattern f testimatr ~µ is similar t that f ~µ as fr relative efficiency, and bias rati are cncerned (see Table 3 ). TABLE : Shwing Eff ( ɶ µ µ ) when b =.,., α =.,.5,.,.35, and λ =.(.)()3. b α....3.4.5.6. 8.643 7.35 6.644 6.35 5.7 5.377 4.67..5 6.554 5.399 4.937 4.39 3.93 3.663 3.. 4.893 4.53 3.847 3.893 3.85.964.7.35 3.776 3.783.655.444.3.96.9. 6.53 6.87 5.74 5.8 4.693 4.35 3.83..5 5.57 5.4 4.77 4.63 3.864 3.5.93. 3.973 3.6 3.64.953.75.43.66.35.95.794.75.635.49.97.5 Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences 35

TABLE (cntinued): Shwing Eff ( ɶ µ µ ) when b =.,., α =.,.5,.,.35, and λ =.(.)()3. b α.7.8.9..5..5 3.. 4. 3.856 3.46.937.99.37.99.5..5.83.63.37.84.74.36.4.5..74.573.985.765.499.4.9..35.93.893.8.73.5.53.97.. 3.53 3.64.735.595.8.5.83.3..5.7.494..975.645.4....73.99.854.673.588.63.6..35.98.796.633.43.3.48.3.957 TABLE : Shwing B ( ɶ µ µ ) when b =.,., α =.,.5,.,.35, and λ =.(.)()3. b α....3.4.5.6.. -.49 -.5 -.66 -. -. -.8..5. -.36 -. -.6 -.94 -.9 -.4.. -. -.85 -.43 -.7 -.85 -.95.35. -.5 -.537 -.5 -.48 -.6 -.73.. -.4 -.4 -.6 -. -. -.7..5. -.35 -. -.58 -.9 -. -.4.. -. -.83 -.4 -.7 -.85 -.94.35. -.4 -.5 -.4 -.4 -.6 -.73 36 Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences

On Huntsberger Type Shrinkage Estimatr fr the Mean f Nrmal Distributin TABLE (cntinued): Shwing B ( ɶ µ µ ) when b =.,., α =.,.5,.,.35, and λ =.(.)()3. b α.7.8.9..5..5 3.. -.3 -.33 -.45 -.5 -.94 -.36 -.385 -.43..5 -.6 -.9 -.35 -.38 -.63 -.38 -.36 -.4. -.98 -.4 -.7 -.3 -.56 -.94 -.333 -.395.35 -.88 -.9 -.97 -.98 -.36 -.77 -.3 -.376. -.3 -.3 -.43 -.45 -.9 -.34 -.383 -.49..5 -. -.4 -.53 -.36 -.6 -.33 -.36 -.47. -.97 -.3 -.6 -. -.55 -.93 -.33 -.394.35 -.87 -.9 -.95 -.97 -.35 -.76 -.3 -.374 TABLE 3: Shwing Eff ( ɶ µ µ ) when b =.,., α =.,.5,.,.35, and λ =.. b n α..5..35 4 4.78.34 7.56 5.35 8 7.34.79.838 7.83. 7.93 4.48.78 8.935 6 8.3 5.6 4.464 9.673 8.58 5.855 3.45.38 4 4.643.45 7.534 5.5 8 7.7.6.769 7.773. 7.7 4.78.85 8.86 6 8.85 5. 3.347 9.5 8.349 5.69 4.34.8 Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences 37

CONCLUSION Testimatr µɶ is better than that f, Saxena and Singh, (6), Kamb et al., (99), Hiran, (977), Davis and Arnld, (97), Arnld, (969) and Thmpsn, (968a) bth in terms f higher relative efficiency and barder range f λ fr which efficiency is greater than unity and better than Al-Hemyari et al., (9b) if λ.4. Als, n cmparing Table 3 (fr unknwn σ case) with the crrespnding results f Saxena and Singh, (6), Hiran, (977), Davis and Arnld, (97), Arnld, (969) and Thmpsn, (968a), it has been bserved that µɶ is als much better in terms f higher relative efficiency than the existing testimatrs with unknwn σ. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am pleased t thankful t the referees, whse suggestins imprved the paper cnsiderably. REFERENCES Al-Hemyari, Z A.. Sme testimatrs fr the scale parameter and Reliability Functin f Weibull Lifetime Data. J. f Risk and Reliability, 4:-9. Al-Hemyari, Z A. 9a. Reliability Functin Estimatr with Expnential Failure Mdel fr Engineering Data. Prceedings f the 9 Internatinal Cnference f Cmputatinal Statistics and Data Engineering, IAENG, Lndn, II:38-34. Al-Hemyari, Z A. Khurshid, A. Al-Jbry, A. 9b. On Thmpsn type estimatrs fr the mean f nrmal distributin. Revista Investigacin Operacinl, 3():9-6. Arnld, J. C. 969. A mdified technique fr imprving an estimate f the mean. Bimetrics, 5:45-44. Bain, L. J. and Engelharadt, M. 99. Statistical Analysis f Reliability and Life Testing Mdels. New Yrk: Marcel Dekker. Davisn, A. C. 3. Statistical mdels. Cambridge University Press. 38 Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences

On Huntsberger Type Shrinkage Estimatr fr the Mean f Nrmal Distributin Davis, R. L. and Arnld, J. C. 97. An efficient preliminary test estimatr fr the variance f nrmal ppulatin when the mean is knwn. Bimetrika, 57:674-677. Gdman, L. A. 953. A simple methd fr imprving sme estimatrs. Annals f Mathematical Statistics, 4:4-7. Hiran, K. 977. Estimatin prcedures based n preliminary test, shrinkage technique and infrmatin criterin. Annals f the Institute f Statistical Mathematics, 9:-34. Huntsberger, D. V. 955. A generalizatin f a preliminary testing prcedure fr pling data. Ann. Math. Statist., 6:734-743. Kamb, N. S., Handa, B. R. and Al-Hemyari, Z. A. 99. On shrunken estimatin fr expnential scale parameter. Jurnal f Statistical Planning and Inference, 4:87-94. Kamb, N. S., Handa, B. R. and Al-Hemyari, Z. A. 99. On Huntesberger type shrinkage estimatr. Cmmunicatins in Statistics: Thery and Methds, :83-84. Karanta, I.. Expert system in frecast mdel building, Prc. 9th Finish Artificial Intelligence Cnf. n AI f tmrrw: Sympsium n Thery, Esp, 77-85. Lemmer, H. 6. Shrinkage Estimatrs. In: Encyclpedia f Statistical Sciences, Secnd Editin, :774-777 (Eds. S. Ktz, N. Balakrishnan, C. B. Read and B. Vidakvic), New Yrk: Jhn Wiley. Mehta, J.S. and Srinivasan, R. 97. Estimatin f the mean by shrinkage t a pint. Jurnal f the American Statistical Assciatin, 66:86-9. Saxena, S. and Singh, H. P. 6. Frm rdinary t shrinkage square rt estimatrs. Cmmunicatins in Statistics: Thery and Methds, 35: 37-58. Singh, H. P. and Saxena, S. 5. Estimating Fisher infrmatin in nrmal ppulatin with prir infrmatin. Statistica, LXV, 73-9. Singh, H. P., Saxena, S. and Espej, M. R. 4. Estimatin f standard deviatin in nrmal parameter by shrinkage twards an interval. Jurnal f Statistical Planning and Inference, 6:479-493. Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences 39

Thmpsn, J. R. 968a. Sme shrinkage techniques fr estimating the mean. Jurnal f the American Statistical Assciatin, 63:3-. Thmpsn, J. R. 968b. Accuracy brrwing in the estimatin f the mean by shrinkage t an interval. Jurnal f the American Statistical Assciatin, 63:953-963 4 Malaysian Jurnal f Mathematical Sciences