Togliatti systems and artinian ideals failing WLP. Weak Lefschetz Property

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 15 Jun 2017

Laplace equations and the Strong Lefschetz Property

Lefschetz Properties of Monomial Ideals NASRIN ALTAFI

ON THE WEAK LEFSCHETZ PROPERTY FOR ARTINIAN GORENSTEIN ALGEBRAS OF CODIMENSION THREE

Projective Schemes with Degenerate General Hyperplane Section II

On finite Steiner surfaces

Combinatorics and geometry of E 7

12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem

Sixty-Four Curves of Degree Six

THE QUADRO-QUADRIC CREMONA TRANSFORMATIONS OF P 4 AND P 5

Delzant s Garden. A one-hour tour to symplectic toric geometry

Computing toric degenerations of flag varieties

The Pythagoras numbers of projective varieties.

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

The Hilbert functions which force the Weak Lefschetz Property

Secant varieties. Marin Petkovic. November 23, 2015

ON IDEALS WITH THE REES PROPERTY

TWO LECTURES ON APOLARITY AND THE VARIETY OF SUMS OF POWERS

MODULI SPACES OF CURVES

Cubic fourfolds and odd-torsion Brauer Manin obstructions on K3 surfaces

Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #23 11/26/2013

Geometry and combinatorics of spherical varieties.

A PACKAGE FOR COMPUTING IMPLICIT EQUATIONS OF PARAMETRIZATIONS FROM TORIC SURFACES

Monomial equivariant embeddings of quasitoric manifolds and the problem of existence of invariant almost complex structures.

Topics in Curve and Surface Implicitization

THE ENVELOPE OF LINES MEETING A FIXED LINE AND TANGENT TO TWO SPHERES

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 17 Feb 2009

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 3 Mar 2018

D-MATH Algebraic Geometry FS 2018 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski. Solutions Sheet 1. Classical Varieties

arxiv:math.ag/ v1 7 Jan 2005

Algebraic geometry for geometric modeling

NUMERICAL MONOIDS (I)

Higher secant varieties of classical projective varieties

(1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections

Lecture 1. Frits Beukers. October 23, Lecture 1 October 23, / 34

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

Finite affine planes in projective spaces

COMBINATORICS OF RANK JUMPS IN SIMPLICIAL HYPERGEOMETRIC SYSTEMS

OLIVIER SERMAN. Theorem 1.1. The moduli space of rank 3 vector bundles over a curve of genus 2 is a local complete intersection.

PROBLEMS, MATH 214A. Affine and quasi-affine varieties

Horrocks correspondence

Secant Varieties and Inverse Systems. Anthony V. Geramita. Ottawa Workshop on Inverse Systems January, 2005

where m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism

Secant varieties of toric varieties

Hamiltonian Tournaments and Gorenstein Rings

NONCOMMUTATIVE GRADED GORENSTEIN ISOLATED SINGULARITIES

ARITHMETICALLY COHEN-MACAULAY BUNDLES ON THREE DIMENSIONAL HYPERSURFACES

ADVANCED TOPICS IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY

Associated graded rings of one-dimensional analytically irreducible rings

Journal of Algebra 226, (2000) doi: /jabr , available online at on. Artin Level Modules.

Linear precision for parametric patches Special session on Applications of Algebraic Geometry AMS meeting in Vancouver, 4 October 2008

1 Hilbert function. 1.1 Graded rings. 1.2 Graded modules. 1.3 Hilbert function

Rational Normal Curves as Set-Theoretic Complete Intersections of Quadrics

The partial-fractions method for counting solutions to integral linear systems

Elliptic Curves and the abc Conjecture

Resolution of Singularities in Algebraic Varieties

LECTURE 4. Definition 1.1. A Schubert class σ λ is called rigid if the only proper subvarieties of G(k, n) representing σ λ are Schubert varieties.

COMPLETE ARCS: BOUNDS AND CONSTRUCTIONS. Fernanda Pambianco

OSCULATION FOR CONIC FIBRATIONS

Algebraic Geometry (Math 6130)

On the Computation of the Adjoint Ideal of Curves with Ordinary Singularities

Math 797W Homework 4

ON CERTAIN CLASSES OF CURVE SINGULARITIES WITH REDUCED TANGENT CONE

Elliptic Curves and Public Key Cryptography (3rd VDS Summer School) Discussion/Problem Session I

Examples of numerics in commutative algebra and algebraic geo

Yuriy Drozd. Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry. Kaiserslautern 1998/99

On the lifting problem in positive characteristic

arxiv: v2 [math.ac] 19 Oct 2014

Secant Varieties of Segre Varieties. M. Catalisano, A.V. Geramita, A. Gimigliano

Binomial Exercises A = 1 1 and 1

9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up

Milnor Fibers of Line Arrangements

David Eklund. May 12, 2017

Isomorphism classes of short Gorenstein local rings via Macaulay s inverse system

EDITED BY DANIEL ERMAN, FRANK MOORE, AND JOANNA NILSSON

ARITHMETICALLY COHEN-MACAULAY BUNDLES ON HYPERSURFACES

SPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES IN COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS

RESEARCH STATEMENT FEI XU

Gram Spectrahedra. Lynn Chua UC Berkeley. joint work with Daniel Plaumann, Rainer Sinn, and Cynthia Vinzant

Cones of effective divisors on the blown-up P3 in general lines

A REMARK ON SIMPLICITY OF VERTEX ALGEBRAS AND LIE CONFORMAL ALGEBRAS

THE CONE OF BETTI TABLES OVER THREE NON-COLLINEAR POINTS IN THE PLANE

mult V f, where the sum ranges over prime divisor V X. We say that two divisors D 1 and D 2 are linearly equivalent, denoted by sending

Tensor decomposition and tensor rank

LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES WITH INFINITE DIMENSIONAL SOCLES

An Algebraic and Geometric Perspective on Exponential Families

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 19 Jan 2010

Toric Varieties and the Secondary Fan

Some Two Character Sets

IDEALS AND THEIR INTEGRAL CLOSURE

Smale s Mean Value Conjecture. and Related Problems. The University of Hong Kong

On complete degenerations of surfaces with ordinary singularities in

A VERY GENERAL QUARTIC DOUBLE FOURFOLD IS NOT STABLY RATIONAL

Vector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo. 1. The notion of vector bundle

Boij-Söderberg Theory

ON THE INTEGRAL HODGE CONJECTURE FOR REAL THREEFOLDS. 1. Motivation

Homogeneous Coordinate Ring

On Congruences of Linear Spaces of Order One

arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 8 Mar 2016

RIMS-1743 K3 SURFACES OF GENUS SIXTEEN. Shigeru MUKAI. February 2012 RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES. KYOTO UNIVERSITY, Kyoto, Japan

Transcription:

Togliatti systems and artinian ideals failing the Weak Lefschetz Property Dipartimento di Matematica e Geoscienze Università degli Studi di Trieste mezzette@units.it Lefschetz Properties and Artinian Algebras Banff, March 15 2016

Outline 1 2 3 4 Joint work with R.M. Miró-Roig and G. Ottaviani

Osculating spaces K algebraically closed field, char(k ) = 0 X P N x X projective variety of dimension n a smooth point X has an affine local parametrization Φ(t 1,..., t n ) in formal power series in a neighbourhood of x t 1,..., t n local parameters x = Φ(0,..., 0) The vector tangent space T x X, in differential geometric sense, is generated by the partial derivatives vectors Φ t1 (0),..., Φ tn (0). The s-th osculating space T (s) x X, s 1, is generated by all partial derivatives of order s.

Osculating spaces K algebraically closed field, char(k ) = 0 X P N x X projective variety of dimension n a smooth point X has an affine local parametrization Φ(t 1,..., t n ) in formal power series in a neighbourhood of x t 1,..., t n local parameters x = Φ(0,..., 0) The vector tangent space T x X, in differential geometric sense, is generated by the partial derivatives vectors Φ t1 (0),..., Φ tn (0). The s-th osculating space T (s) x X, s 1, is generated by all partial derivatives of order s.

Osculating spaces K algebraically closed field, char(k ) = 0 X P N x X projective variety of dimension n a smooth point X has an affine local parametrization Φ(t 1,..., t n ) in formal power series in a neighbourhood of x t 1,..., t n local parameters x = Φ(0,..., 0) The vector tangent space T x X, in differential geometric sense, is generated by the partial derivatives vectors Φ t1 (0),..., Φ tn (0). The s-th osculating space T (s) x X, s 1, is generated by all partial derivatives of order s.

Rational varieties If X is a rational variety, there is a rational parametrization F i S := K [x 0,..., x n ] d φ : P n [F 0,...,F N ] X P N The embedded s-th osculating space T (s) x X is generated by all partials of order s of φ (Euler). Definition 1. The expected dimension of T (s) x X is min{n, ( ) n+s s 1} 2. X satisfies δ of order s if at a general smooth point x dim T (s) x X = ( n + s s ) 1 δ

Rational varieties If X is a rational variety, there is a rational parametrization F i S := K [x 0,..., x n ] d φ : P n [F 0,...,F N ] X P N The embedded s-th osculating space T (s) x X is generated by all partials of order s of φ (Euler). Definition 1. The expected dimension of T (s) x X is min{n, ( ) n+s s 1} 2. X satisfies δ of order s if at a general smooth point x dim T (s) x X = ( n + s s ) 1 δ

Rational varieties If X is a rational variety, there is a rational parametrization F i S := K [x 0,..., x n ] d φ : P n [F 0,...,F N ] X P N The embedded s-th osculating space T (s) x X is generated by all partials of order s of φ (Euler). Definition 1. The expected dimension of T (s) x X is min{n, ( ) n+s s 1} 2. X satisfies δ of order s if at a general smooth point x dim T (s) x X = ( n + s s ) 1 δ

Rational varieties If X is a rational variety, there is a rational parametrization F i S := K [x 0,..., x n ] d φ : P n [F 0,...,F N ] X P N The embedded s-th osculating space T (s) x X is generated by all partials of order s of φ (Euler). Definition 1. The expected dimension of T (s) x X is min{n, ( ) n+s s 1} 2. X satisfies δ of order s if at a general smooth point x dim T (s) x X = ( n + s s ) 1 δ

Examples 1. Ruled varieties: the parametrization can be chosen so that one of the variables appears at most at degree 1 in the components of φ. 2. Curves: at a general point the osculating space always has the expected dimension. 3. Togliatti surface (Eugenio Togliatti, 1929, 1946) X P 5, rational surface parametrized by cubics, special projection of the del Pezzo sextic surface S P 6.

Examples 1. Ruled varieties: the parametrization can be chosen so that one of the variables appears at most at degree 1 in the components of φ. 2. Curves: at a general point the osculating space always has the expected dimension. 3. Togliatti surface (Eugenio Togliatti, 1929, 1946) X P 5, rational surface parametrized by cubics, special projection of the del Pezzo sextic surface S P 6.

Examples 1. Ruled varieties: the parametrization can be chosen so that one of the variables appears at most at degree 1 in the components of φ. 2. Curves: at a general point the osculating space always has the expected dimension. 3. Togliatti surface (Eugenio Togliatti, 1929, 1946) X P 5, rational surface parametrized by cubics, special projection of the del Pezzo sextic surface S P 6.

Togliatti surface The parametrization is: φ : P 2 P 5 φ : [x, y, z] [x 2 y, x 2 z, xy 2, xz 2, y 2 z, yz 2 ] The Laplace equation: x 2 φ xx xyφ xy xzφ xz + y 2 φ yy yzφ yz + z 2 φ zz = 0 Geometric interpretation: consider v 3 : (P 2 ) P 9 = P(K [a, b, c] 3 ) the triple Veronese embedding v 3 : l[a, b, c] l 3 then project v 3 (P 2 ) first from the plane a 3, b 3, c 3 and get the del Pezzo surface S, then from the point abc, that belongs to all its osculating spaces.

Togliatti surface The parametrization is: φ : P 2 P 5 φ : [x, y, z] [x 2 y, x 2 z, xy 2, xz 2, y 2 z, yz 2 ] The Laplace equation: x 2 φ xx xyφ xy xzφ xz + y 2 φ yy yzφ yz + z 2 φ zz = 0 Geometric interpretation: consider v 3 : (P 2 ) P 9 = P(K [a, b, c] 3 ) the triple Veronese embedding v 3 : l[a, b, c] l 3 then project v 3 (P 2 ) first from the plane a 3, b 3, c 3 and get the del Pezzo surface S, then from the point abc, that belongs to all its osculating spaces.

1946: Togliatti classifies all the projections of v 3 (P 2 ) satisfying at least one Laplace equation of order 2 2007: Brenner - Kaid: if char K = 0, an ideal I = (x 3, y 3, z 3, f (x, y, z)), deg f = 3, fails WLP if and only if f (x 3, y 3, z 3, xyz). Which is the connection between these two examples?

1946: Togliatti classifies all the projections of v 3 (P 2 ) satisfying at least one Laplace equation of order 2 2007: Brenner - Kaid: if char K = 0, an ideal I = (x 3, y 3, z 3, f (x, y, z)), deg f = 3, fails WLP if and only if f (x 3, y 3, z 3, xyz). Which is the connection between these two examples?

Apolarity, or Macaulay-Matlis duality I S = K [x 0,..., x n ] homogenous ideal D = K [y 0,..., y n ] S-module with the product given by differentiation: FD := F( y 0,..., y n )(D) I 1 = {D D FD = 0 F I}, graded S-submodule of D: Macaulay inverse system of I Conversely: given M D graded S-submodule, Ann(M) S is a homogenous ideal. Bijection: {homogeneous artinian ideals of S} {graded finitely generated S submodules of D}

Apolarity, or Macaulay-Matlis duality I S = K [x 0,..., x n ] homogenous ideal D = K [y 0,..., y n ] S-module with the product given by differentiation: FD := F( y 0,..., y n )(D) I 1 = {D D FD = 0 F I}, graded S-submodule of D: Macaulay inverse system of I Conversely: given M D graded S-submodule, Ann(M) S is a homogenous ideal. Bijection: {homogeneous artinian ideals of S} {graded finitely generated S submodules of D}

Apolar varieties If I is monomial, generated by monomials all of degree d, I 1 can be seen inside S, generated by the monomials of degree d not in I. If I is artinian: I = (F 1,..., F r ), F 1,..., F r of degree d, then (I 1 ) d is a linear system of hypersurfaces of degree d. We have maps: : P n X P N, N = ( ) n+d d 1 r φ (I 1 ) d X rational variety projection of v d (P n ) from F 1,..., F r, φ Id : P n Y P r 1 is a morphism. X and Y are apolar varieties

Apolar varieties If I is monomial, generated by monomials all of degree d, I 1 can be seen inside S, generated by the monomials of degree d not in I. If I is artinian: I = (F 1,..., F r ), F 1,..., F r of degree d, then (I 1 ) d is a linear system of hypersurfaces of degree d. We have maps: : P n X P N, N = ( ) n+d d 1 r φ (I 1 ) d X rational variety projection of v d (P n ) from F 1,..., F r, φ Id : P n Y P r 1 is a morphism. X and Y are apolar varieties

Apolar varieties If I is monomial, generated by monomials all of degree d, I 1 can be seen inside S, generated by the monomials of degree d not in I. If I is artinian: I = (F 1,..., F r ), F 1,..., F r of degree d, then (I 1 ) d is a linear system of hypersurfaces of degree d. We have maps: : P n X P N, N = ( ) n+d d 1 r φ (I 1 ) d X rational variety projection of v d (P n ) from F 1,..., F r, φ Id : P n Y P r 1 is a morphism. X and Y are apolar varieties

Apolar varieties If I is monomial, generated by monomials all of degree d, I 1 can be seen inside S, generated by the monomials of degree d not in I. If I is artinian: I = (F 1,..., F r ), F 1,..., F r of degree d, then (I 1 ) d is a linear system of hypersurfaces of degree d. We have maps: : P n X P N, N = ( ) n+d d 1 r φ (I 1 ) d X rational variety projection of v d (P n ) from F 1,..., F r, φ Id : P n Y P r 1 is a morphism. X and Y are apolar varieties

Togliatti systems Theorem (MMO, 2013) I S homogeneous artinian ideal generated by F 1,..., F r of degree d. Let r ( ) n+d 1 n 1. The following are equivalent: 1 I fails WLP in degree d 1; 2 F 1,..., F r become linearly dependent in S/(L), for any linear form L; 3 X satisfies at least one Laplace equation of order d 1. The ideals I as in the Theorem are called Togliatti systems. Remark The assumption on r means that the satisfied by X are not trivial. For example, if n = 2 r d + 1.

Togliatti systems Theorem (MMO, 2013) I S homogeneous artinian ideal generated by F 1,..., F r of degree d. Let r ( ) n+d 1 n 1. The following are equivalent: 1 I fails WLP in degree d 1; 2 F 1,..., F r become linearly dependent in S/(L), for any linear form L; 3 X satisfies at least one Laplace equation of order d 1. The ideals I as in the Theorem are called Togliatti systems. Remark The assumption on r means that the satisfied by X are not trivial. For example, if n = 2 r d + 1.

Togliatti systems Theorem (MMO, 2013) I S homogeneous artinian ideal generated by F 1,..., F r of degree d. Let r ( ) n+d 1 n 1. The following are equivalent: 1 I fails WLP in degree d 1; 2 F 1,..., F r become linearly dependent in S/(L), for any linear form L; 3 X satisfies at least one Laplace equation of order d 1. The ideals I as in the Theorem are called Togliatti systems. Remark The assumption on r means that the satisfied by X are not trivial. For example, if n = 2 r d + 1.

Minimal and smooth Togliatti systems Definition A Togliatti system I is called: monomial if I can be generated by monomials; minimal if I does not contain any smaller Togliatti system; smooth if X is a smooth variety. Goal: classify the minimal smooth Togliatti systems. Reformulation of Togliatti s result: if n = 2, d = 3, the only smooth Togliatti system is I = (x 3, y 3, z 3, xyz). Remark If I S = K [x 0,..., x n ] is artinian monomial generated in degree d, then I contains x d 0,..., x d n.

Minimal and smooth Togliatti systems Definition A Togliatti system I is called: monomial if I can be generated by monomials; minimal if I does not contain any smaller Togliatti system; smooth if X is a smooth variety. Goal: classify the minimal smooth Togliatti systems. Reformulation of Togliatti s result: if n = 2, d = 3, the only smooth Togliatti system is I = (x 3, y 3, z 3, xyz). Remark If I S = K [x 0,..., x n ] is artinian monomial generated in degree d, then I contains x d 0,..., x d n.

Minimal and smooth Togliatti systems Definition A Togliatti system I is called: monomial if I can be generated by monomials; minimal if I does not contain any smaller Togliatti system; smooth if X is a smooth variety. Goal: classify the minimal smooth Togliatti systems. Reformulation of Togliatti s result: if n = 2, d = 3, the only smooth Togliatti system is I = (x 3, y 3, z 3, xyz). Remark If I S = K [x 0,..., x n ] is artinian monomial generated in degree d, then I contains x d 0,..., x d n.

Minimal and smooth Togliatti systems Definition A Togliatti system I is called: monomial if I can be generated by monomials; minimal if I does not contain any smaller Togliatti system; smooth if X is a smooth variety. Goal: classify the minimal smooth Togliatti systems. Reformulation of Togliatti s result: if n = 2, d = 3, the only smooth Togliatti system is I = (x 3, y 3, z 3, xyz). Remark If I S = K [x 0,..., x n ] is artinian monomial generated in degree d, then I contains x d 0,..., x d n.

Togliatti systems of cubics, n = 3 Theorem (MMO, 2013) If n = 3, d = 3, the only monomial minimal smooth Togliatti systems are 1 (x 3, y 3, z 3, t 3, xyz, xyt, xzt, yzt) the triple embedding of P 3 blown up at 4 general points, then suitably projected from a P 3 - truncated simplex 2 (x 3, y 3, z 3, t 3, x 2 y, xy 2, xzt, yzt) the triple embedding of P 3 blown up at 2 points and a line, then suitably projected from a P 1 3 (x 3, y 3, z 3, t 3, x 2 y, xy 2, z 2 t, zt 2 ) the triple embedding of P 3 blown up at 2 skew lines. This answers to a conjecture of G. Ilardi (2006).

Monomial Togliatti systems of cubics In [MMO] there is also a class of examples and a conjecture for monomial minimal smooth Togliatti systems of cubics with n 3. Michałek and Miró-Roig classify monomial minimal smooth Togliatti systems of quadrics and cubics, proving the conjecture (2016).

Monomial Togliatti systems, any d For d > 3 the situation is much more intricate. [MM, 2016] Let µ(i) = minimal number of generators of I. Computation of the minimal and maximal bound on µ(i) for I T (n, d) and I T s (n, d) Classification on the border and near the border Existence results in the admissible range where: T (n, d): minimal monomial Togliatti systems K [x 0,..., x n ] generated in degree d T s (n, d): minimal smooth monomial Togliatti systems in K [x 0,..., x n ] generated in degree d

Toric varieties I S = K [x 0,..., x n ] homogeneous artinian generated by monomials of degree d I 1 inverse system also contained in S The variety X = φ (I 1 ) d (P n ) is a toric projective variety and can be studied with combinatorial methods [Gelfand - Kapranov - Zelevinski]. Definition n standard simplex in R n+1 with coordinates a 0,..., a n Consider d n in the hyperplane a 0 + + a n = d identified with R n Every point (a 0,..., a n ) of d n Z n with a 0 + + a n = d corresponds to a monomial x a 0 0... x n an S d.

Toric varieties I S = K [x 0,..., x n ] homogeneous artinian generated by monomials of degree d I 1 inverse system also contained in S The variety X = φ (I 1 ) d (P n ) is a toric projective variety and can be studied with combinatorial methods [Gelfand - Kapranov - Zelevinski]. Definition n standard simplex in R n+1 with coordinates a 0,..., a n Consider d n in the hyperplane a 0 + + a n = d identified with R n Every point (a 0,..., a n ) of d n Z n with a 0 + + a n = d corresponds to a monomial x a 0 0... x n an S d.

Polytopes Given I S monomial artinian ideal generated in degree d: A I d n is the set of points corresponding to monomials of degree d not in I, i.e., in (I 1 ) d. P I is the convex hull of A I : the polytope associated to I. Example: Togliatti s surface Figure : A I is the punctured hexagon

Polytopes Given I S monomial artinian ideal generated in degree d: A I d n is the set of points corresponding to monomials of degree d not in I, i.e., in (I 1 ) d. P I is the convex hull of A I : the polytope associated to I. Example: Togliatti s surface Figure : A I is the punctured hexagon

Two Togliatti examples with n = 3, d = 3 Figure : The truncated simplex and case 2 If n > 3 all monomial minimal smooth Togliatti systems correspond to a partition of the vertices (with some condition). We remove the corresponding faces and the centres of the remaining hexagons.

Two Togliatti examples with n = 3, d = 3 Figure : The truncated simplex and case 2 If n > 3 all monomial minimal smooth Togliatti systems correspond to a partition of the vertices (with some condition). We remove the corresponding faces and the centres of the remaining hexagons.

Two facts Theorem (Perkinson, 2000) I is a Togliatti system if and only there exists a hypersurface of degree d 1 in R n containing all points of A I. Moreover I is a minimal Togliatti system if and only if every such hypersurface does not contain any point of d n \ A I except possibly some vertex.

Theorem (GKZ) The toric variety X is smooth if and only if 1 translating every vertex v of P I in the origin, and considering on any edge emanating from v the first point with integer coordinates, they form a Z-basis of Z n ; 2 technical condition. If n = 2 it says that every inner point in an edge of P I must belong to A I.

Trivial Togliatti systems Definition A Togliatti system is trivial if I contains x 0 F,..., x n F for some form F of degree d 1. The hypersurface of degree d 1 containing all points of A I is a union of hyperplanes. Here is a trivial smooth Togliatti system with d = 5.

A trivial monomial Togliatti system can have 2n + 1 or 2n + 2 generators. For instance, with d = 4: 2n + 1 generators: (x 4 0,..., x 4 n, x 3 0 x 1,..., x 3 0 x n), or 2n + 2 generators: (x 4 0,..., x 4 n, x 2 0 x 1x 2, x 0 x 2 1 x 2, x 0 x 1 x 2 2, x 0x 1 x 2 x 3,..., x 0 x 1 x 2 x n )

Results Define µ(n, d) = min{µ(i) I T (n, d)} µ s (n, d) = min{µ(i) I T s (n, d)} Theorem (MM, 2016) 1 For all n 2, d 4 µ(n, d) = µ s (n, d) = 2n + 1. 2 If µ(i) = 2n + 1 then either I is trivial, or n = 2, µ(i) = 5 and, up to permutation of the coordinates, either d = 4, I = (x 4, y 4, z 4, x 2 yz, y 2 z 2 ) non-smooth, or d = 5, I = (x 5, y 5, z 5, x 3 yz, xy 2 z 2 ) smooth.

Figure : The smooth Togliatti system with n = 2, d = 5, µ(i) = 5. This rational surface X has inflection points, i.e. points where the dimension of T (s) x X decreases more than for general x, for s 4. The hypersurface of degree 4 containing A I is irreducible.

Theorem (MM, 2016) If d 4 and I is a smooth monomial minimal Togliatti system with µ(i) = 2n + 2, then either I is trivial, or n = 2, µ(i) = 6. Moreover, up to permutation of the coordinates, either d = 5, three cases, or d = 7, three cases.

Picture for n = 2, d 4 Define ρ(n, d) = max{µ(i) I T (n, d)} ρ s (n, d) = max{µ(i) I T s (n, d)} Let n = 2. For any d 4: µ(2, d) = µ s (2, d) = 5; ρ(2, d) = ρ s (2, d) = d + 1; for any r with 5 r d + 1, there exists I T s (2, d) with µ(i) = r.

Picture for n = 2, d 4 Define ρ(n, d) = max{µ(i) I T (n, d)} ρ s (n, d) = max{µ(i) I T s (n, d)} Let n = 2. For any d 4: µ(2, d) = µ s (2, d) = 5; ρ(2, d) = ρ s (2, d) = d + 1; for any r with 5 r d + 1, there exists I T s (2, d) with µ(i) = r.

Gaps for n 3 If n 3, d 4: monomial Togliatti systems with µ(i) = 2n + 1, 2n + 2 are trivial; there is no smooth monomial minimal Togliatti system with µ(i) = 2n + 3; ρ(n, d) = ( ) n+d 1 n 1 ; if n = 3, for any d 4 and r with µ(3, d) = 7 r ρ(3, d) = ( ) d+2 2, there exists I T (3, d) with µ(i) = r.

Thank you!

References E. Togliatti, Alcuni esempi di superfici algebriche degli iperspazi che rappresentano un equazione di Laplace, Comm. Math. Helvetici 1 (1929), 255-272. E. Togliatti, Alcune osservazioni sulle superfici razionali che rappresentano equazioni di Laplace, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 25 (1946) 325-339. H. Brenner and A. Kaid, Syzygy bundles on P 2 and the Weak Lefschetz Property, Illinois J. Math. 51 (2007), 1299 1308. E. Mezzetti, R.M. Miró-Roig and G. Ottaviani: Laplace Equations and the Weak Lefschetz Property, Canad. J. Math. 65 (2013), 634 654.

G. Ilardi, Togliatti systems, Osaka J. Math. 43 (2006), 1 12. M. Michałek and R.M. Miró-Roig, Smooth monomial Togliatti systems of cubics, arxiv:1310.2529. E. Mezzetti and R.M. Miró-Roig, The minimal number of generators of a Togliatti system, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., to appear. D. Perkinson, Inflections of toric varieties, Michigan Math. J. 48 (2000), 483 515.