Nature Structural & Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb.3194

Similar documents
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Bayro, 2011, JACS Intermolecular structure determination of amyloid fibrils with magic-angle spinning and dynamic nuclear polarization NMR

Dipole Recoupling at High Spinning Frequencies. and. High Magnetic Fields

Electronic Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 November 17.

Introduction to" Protein Structure

Chapter 6. The interaction of Src SH2 with the focal adhesion kinase catalytic domain studied by NMR

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Materials for

NMR in Medicine and Biology

I690/B680 Structural Bioinformatics Spring Protein Structure Determination by NMR Spectroscopy

Formed by a TTR Mutant. Supporting Information

Atomic structure and handedness of the building block of a biological assembly

Supplementary figure 1. Comparison of unbound ogm-csf and ogm-csf as captured in the GIF:GM-CSF complex. Alignment of two copies of unbound ovine

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Biochemistry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2006 April 13.

Table S1. Primers used for the constructions of recombinant GAL1 and λ5 mutants. GAL1-E74A ccgagcagcgggcggctgtctttcc ggaaagacagccgcccgctgctcgg

NMR in Structural Biology

DNP enhanced frequency-selective TEDOR experiments in bacteriorhodopsin

Christopher Pavlik Bioanalytical Chemistry March 2, 2011

Timescales of Protein Dynamics

Protein dynamics from NMR Relaxation data

THE TANGO ALGORITHM: SECONDARY STRUCTURE PROPENSITIES, STATISTICAL MECHANICS APPROXIMATION

Protein structure determination by solid-state NMR

Sensitive NMR Approach for Determining the Binding Mode of Tightly Binding Ligand Molecules to Protein Targets

Timescales of Protein Dynamics

Protein NMR. Bin Huang

NMR study of complexes between low molecular mass inhibitors and the West Nile virus NS2B-NS3 protease

X 1 H rotational-echo double-resonance NMR for torsion angle determination of peptides

Supporting information for. Towards automatic protein backbone assignment using proton-detected 4D solid-state NMR data

Supplementary Figure 1.

Center for Sustainable Environmental Technologies, Iowa State University

Macromolecular X-ray Crystallography

Acta Crystallographica Section D

Solid-State NMR Structural Studies of Proteins Using Paramagnetic Probes

Sequential Assignment Strategies in Proteins

Introduction solution NMR

Chemical Shift Anisotropy & Multidimensional Recoupling for Uniformly Labeled Proteins

D = kt/6 a. d /2D. For sucrose/h 2O, we have D = 0.521X10

Table S1. Overview of used PDZK1 constructs and their binding affinities to peptides. Related to figure 1.

Protein Structure Determination using NMR Spectroscopy. Cesar Trinidad

Interpreting and evaluating biological NMR in the literature. Worksheet 1

(Supplementary Information)

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1. Definition and assessment of ciap1 constructs.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION. for. Investigations of dynamic amyloid-like structures of the Wnt signalling pathway by solid-state NMR

Structure, mechanism and ensemble formation of the Alkylhydroperoxide Reductase subunits. AhpC and AhpF from Escherichia coli

Structural characterization of NiV N 0 P in solution and in crystal.

Automated Assignment of Backbone NMR Data using Artificial Intelligence

Cross Polarization 53 53

Introduction to Comparative Protein Modeling. Chapter 4 Part I

T H E J O U R N A L O F G E N E R A L P H Y S I O L O G Y. jgp

High Frequency sonoatrp of 2-Hydroxyethyl Acrylate in an Aqueous Medium

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

NMR, X-ray Diffraction, Protein Structure, and RasMol

An engineered scorpion toxin analogue with improved Kv1.3 selectivity displays reduced conformational flexibility

A Combined Optical and EPR Spectroscopy Study: Azobenzene-Based Biradicals as Reversible Molecular Photoswitches

Supporting Information. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2009

Details of Protein Structure

Principles of NMR Protein Spectroscopy. 2) Assignment of chemical shifts in a protein ( 1 H, 13 C, 15 N) 3) Three dimensional structure determination

CHAPTER 6 CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF A DEHYDROACETIC ACID SUBSTITUTED SCHIFF BASE DERIVATIVE

Molecular Modeling lecture 2

LS1a Fall 2014 Problem Set #2 Due Monday 10/6 at 6 pm in the drop boxes on the Science Center 2 nd Floor

BCMB / CHEM 8190 Biomolecular NMR GRADUATE COURSE OFFERING IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Protein Structure Analysis and Verification. Course S Basics for Biosystems of the Cell exercise work. Maija Nevala, BIO, 67485U 16.1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supporting Protocol This protocol describes the construction and the force-field parameters of the non-standard residue for the Ag + -site using CNS

NMR Assay of Purity and Folding

Coupling of Functional Hydrogen Bonds in Pyridoxal-5 -phosphate- Enzyme Model Systems Observed by Solid State NMR

Supplementary Figure S1. Urea-mediated buffering mechanism of H. pylori. Gastric urea is funneled to a cytoplasmic urease that is presumably attached

Supporting Information

Supporting information for Template-directed proton conduction pathway in a coordination framework

Quantification of Dynamics in the Solid-State

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND INTRODUCTION TO MASS SPECTROMETRY

17. Biomolecular Interaction

HOMOLOGY MODELING. The sequence alignment and template structure are then used to produce a structural model of the target.

Name: BCMB/CHEM 8190, BIOMOLECULAR NMR FINAL EXAM-5/5/10

Examples of Protein Modeling. Protein Modeling. Primary Structure. Protein Structure Description. Protein Sequence Sources. Importing Sequences to MOE

1) NMR is a method of chemical analysis. (Who uses NMR in this way?) 2) NMR is used as a method for medical imaging. (called MRI )

Module 13: Chemical Shift and Its Measurement

H B. θ = 90 o. Lecture notes Part 4: Spin-Spin Coupling. θ θ

BMB/Bi/Ch 173 Winter 2018

Probing Hydrogen Bonding by Solid-State NMR. Steven P. Brown

e 2m e c I, (7.1) = g e β B I(I +1), (7.2) = erg/gauss. (7.3)

Supporting Information

Using NMR to study Macromolecular Interactions. John Gross, BP204A UCSF. Nov 27, 2017

Quantitative Solid-State NMR Study on Ligand Surface Interaction in

Oneshot45 and T 1 -DOSY: the gun and the knife of mixture analysis

NMR Resonance Assignment Assisted by Mass Spectrometry

Module 20: Applications of PMR in Structural Elucidation of Simple and Complex Compounds and 2-D NMR spectroscopy

Supplementary Figures

Basics of protein structure

Supporting Information Elucidating Lithium-Ion and Proton Dynamics in Anti- Perovskite Solid Electrolytes

Basic principles of multidimensional NMR in solution

Solving the three-dimensional solution structures of larger

Structural Biology of Parkinson s disease: structural and functional insights into the interaction of toxic oligomeric α synuclein with membranes

Useful background reading

CHAPTER 29 HW: AMINO ACIDS + PROTEINS

Nitrogenase MoFe protein from Clostridium pasteurianum at 1.08 Å resolution: comparison with the Azotobacter vinelandii MoFe protein

Transcription:

Supplementary Figure 1 Mass spectrometry and solution NMR data for -syn samples used in this study. (a) Matrix-assisted laser-desorption and ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrum of uniformly- 13 C, 15 N- enriched -syn monomer (blue) and natural abundance monomer (red). The molecular mass of natural abundance -syn monomer was calculated to be 14.46 kda, in agreement with the experimental mass spectrum. The mass of 15.24 kda for the U- 13 C, 15 N-labeled sample corresponded to a ~98% incorporation of 13 C and 15 N during protein expression. (b) 15 N- 1 H HSQC spectrum of monomeric -syn prior to fibrillization. The chemical shifts agreed well with the published assignments (Eliezer, D., Kutluay, E., Bussell, R. & Browne, G. Conformational properties of α-synuclein in its free and lipid-associated states. J. Mol. Biol. 307, 1061 1073 (2001).)

Supplementary Figure 2 SSNMR spectroscopy data for -syn fibrils, exhibiting cross-peaks indicative of long-range restraints and intermolecular registry of the fibrils. (a) 2D 13 C- 13 C SSNMR { 1 H}- 13 C-{ 1 H- 1 H}- 13 C spectrum (Lange, A., Luca, S. & Baldus, M. Structural constraints from proton-mediated rare-spin correlation spectroscopy in rotating solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 9704 9705 (2002).) of dilute -syn fibrils (sample D from Table 1) showing unambiguous, long-range intramolecular correlations. Data were acquired at 750 MHz 1 H frequency, 12.5 khz MAS and 400 s 1 H- 1 H mixing time, with 12 days signal averaging. Red labels correspond to unambiguous long-range distances, including those from A78 to V48, from A69 to G93, from F94 to I88, and from V82 to A89. These intramolecular long-range restraints were inconsistent with structural models that exhibit a domain swap. (b-e) 2D 15 N, 13 C SSNMR transferred echo double resonance (TEDOR, Jaroniec, C.P., Filip, C. & Griffin, R.G. 3D TEDOR NMR experiments for the simultaneous measurement of multiple carbon-nitrogen distances in uniformly 13 C, 15 N-labeled solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 10728 10742 (2002).) data showing intermolecular interactions. The data were collected for four samples: (b) 1,3-13 C glycerol, 15 N-labeled fibrils (sample B), signal averaged for 28 hr; (c) 50:50 [1,3-13 C]glycerol, natural abundance (n.a.) nitrogen: n.a. carbon, 15 N labeled (sample E), signal averaged for 81 hr; (d) [2-13 C]glycerol, 15 N labeled (sample C), signal averaged for 113 hr; and (e) 50:50 2-13 C glycerol, n.a. nitrogen: n.a. carbon, 15 N labeled (sample F), signal averaged for 124 hr. Data was collected with mixing times of (c, e) 14.4 ms at 500 MHz 1 H frequency, 11.1 khz MAS, and (b, d) 16.0 ms at 600 MHz 1 H frequency, 10.0 khz MAS. Cross-peaks present in both parts b and c, or d and e, demonstrate a parallel, in-register arrangement (Debelouchina, G.T., Platt, G.W., Bayro, M.J., Radford, S.E. & Griffin, R.G. Intermolecular alignment in 2 -microglobulin amyloid fibrils. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 17077 17079 (2010).) (f k) Spectra of sample B collected at 750 MHz 1 H frequency, 12.5 khz MAS (f-i) 2D 13 C- 13 C spectra using dipolar-assisted rotational resonance (DARR, Takegoshi, K., Nakamura, S. & Terao, T. 13 C- 1 H dipolar-assisted rotational resonance in magic-angle spinning NMR. Chem. Phys. Lett. 344, 631 637 (2001).) mixing times of (f) 50 ms, signal averaged for 10.9 hr, (g) 100 ms, signal averaged for 5.7 hr, (h) 200 ms, signal averaged for 12.0 hr, and (i) 300 ms, signal averaged for 12.7 hr. Several long-range correlations (red) were observed between the F94 aromatic ring resonances (CD and CE) and I88, A90 and A91. (j-k) 2D planes from a 3D 15 N- 13 CO- 13 CX correlation spectrum signal averaged for 24 hr. Long-range correlations observed at this relatively short mixing time indicate internuclear distances <5 Å.

Supplementary Figure 3 Full-length structure of the -syn fibril, illustrating important features in expanded regions. (a) View along the fibril axis showing the highly ordered core and the disordered tails. (b) Side view showing the -sheet packing between each monomer as well as the disordered tails. (c-f) Core interactions illustrating NMR distance restraints with dotted lines. (g-l) Backbone traces for neighboring monomers drawn in blue, yellow, orange and red. (g, h) Side and top views of the salt bridge from E46 to K80 of the neighboring monomer. (i, j) Side and top views of the I88-A91-F94 pocket perpendicular to the fibril axis, exhibiting short intermolecular distances. (k, l) Side and top view of the Q79 side chain exhibiting a glutamine ladder, with intermolecular hydrogen bonds involving Nε2 and Oε1 moieties.

Supplementary Figure 4 SSNMR internal validation of structural restraints and dihedral angles for the -syn fibril structure. (a) The backbone trace is shown in grey, and black lines represent unambiguous distance restraints. Blue lines correspond to the shortest observed distance among the possible ambiguous assignments. The resulting structure is the lowest energy conformer consistent with all of the data. (b-c) Ramachandran probability maps of accepted dihedral angle regions (Lovell, S.C. et al. Structure validation by C geometry:, and C deviation. Proteins 50, 437 450 (2003).) and plotted in Chimera (Pettersen, E.F. et al. UCSF Chimera a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605 1612 (2004).) for residues 41 100. The only residue not in the accepted range is E57, which is part of an unstructured loop and lacks NMR restraints in the simulated annealing calculations. All glycine residues are within the accepted Ramachandran space.

Supplementary Figure 5 Cross-validation of the SSNMR structure of -syn fibrils with electron microscopy and X-ray fiber diffraction. (a) Chemical shift comparison of the fibril sample for solid-state NMR before and after washing with 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1- piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer and sonication for electron microscopy. (b) Expansions of overlaid 2D 13 C- 13 C spectra of the U- 13 C, 15 N -syn fibril as prepared for solid-state NMR (red) and fibrils washed with HEPES buffer as the samples for electron microscopy (blue). Spectra were acquired at 600 MHz 1 H frequency, 13.3 khz magic-angle spinning (MAS) and 50 ms dipolar-assisted rotational resonance (DARR, Takegoshi, K., Nakamura, S. & Terao, T. 13 C- 1 H dipolar-assisted rotational resonance in magic-angle spinning NMR. Chem. Phys. Lett. 344, 631 637 (2001).). (c) Equatorial intensity plot of the calculated and experimental fiber diffraction pattern of the -syn fibril. The solid line shows the experimental fiber diffraction pattern (equatorial intensity projected from Figure 4c) compared to the simulated pattern (dotted line) from the atomic coordinates of the structure presented in Figure 3. The simulated pattern recapitulates the main features of the experimental pattern including the fine features near 0.12 Å -1. The correlation coefficient between the two patterns is 0.77, in good agreement with previous amyloid fibril fiber diffraction comparisons.

Supplementary Figure 6 Comparison of the C chemical-shift perturbations for three early-onset Parkinson's disease mutant forms of -syn, relative to the wild-type chemical shifts. (a c) Chemical shift perturbation plots of the absolute deviation of the C shifts for A30P, E46K, and A53T previously published (Lemkau, L.R. et al. Mutant protein A30P α-synuclein adopts wild-type fibril structure, despite slower fibrillation kinetics. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 11526-11532 (2012); Lemkau, L.R. et al. Site-specific perturbations of α-synuclein fibril structure by the Parkinson's disease associated mutations A53T and E46K. PLoS One 8, e49750 (2013).) relative to the wild-type chemical shifts used in this work.

Supplementary Table 1. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance experiments Sample Experiment Magnet MAS Rate (khz) Mixing (ms) Exp Time (hr) A 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 25 4 A 2D 15 N-{ 13 CO}- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 25 7 A 2D 15 N-{ 13 CA}- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 25 7 A 2D 13 CA-{ 15 N}-{ 13 CO}- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 50 30 A 3D 13 CA-{ 15 N}- 13 CO 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 N/A 4 A 3D 15 N- 13 CA- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 50 58 A 3D 15 N- 13 CO- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 50 29 B 3D 15 N- 13 CO- 13 CX with DARR mixing 11.7 T (WB) 11.111 500 181 B 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 11.7 T (WB) 11.111 500 65 B 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 11.7 T (WB) 11.111 150 50 B 2D 15 N- 13 C with TEDOR mixing 14.1 T (WB) 10.000 B 2D 15 N- 13 C with TEDOR mixing 14.1 T (WB) 10.000 1.6, 3.2, 4.8, 6.4, 9.6, 12.8, 16.0 1.6, 3.2, 4.8, 6.4, 8.0, 9.6, 12.8, 16.0 9, 13, 13, 9, 13, 13, 13 7, 14, 21, 35, 21, 21, 28, 28 B 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 14.1 T (WB) 10.000 500 18 B 3D 15 N- 13 CO- 13 CX with DARR mixing 14.1 T (WB) 13.333 500 159 B 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 14.1 T (WB) 13.333 750 61 B 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 14.1 T (WB) 10.000 B 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 17.6 T (NB) 12.500 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 22, 11, 12, 19, 33, 42 11, 6, 12, 13, 13, 14 B 3D 15 N- 13 CO- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (NB) 12.500 50 11 B 3D 15 N- 13 CO- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (NB) 12.500 100 24 B 3D 15 N- 13 CO- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (NB) 12.500 200 25 B 3D 15 N- 13 CO- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (NB) 12.500 300 26 C 3D 15 N- 13 CA- 13 CX with DARR mixing 11.7 T (WB) 11.111 500 152 C 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 14.1 T (WB) 10.000 C 2D 15 N- 13 C with TEDOR mixing 14.1 T (WB) 10.000 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 1.6, 3.2, 4.8, 6.4, 9.6, 12.8, 16.0 17, 18, 18, 30, 48 17, 22, 30, 22, 30, 113 C 3D 15 N- 13 CA- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 500 88 C 3D 15 N- 13 CO- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 500 35 C 3D 13 CA- 15 N- 13 CO 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 N/A 19 C 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 250 2 C 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 500 22 C 3D 13 C- 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 250, 500 306 C 3D 15 N- 13 CA- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 750 230 C 3D 15 N- 13 CO- 13 CX with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 750 100 D 2D 13 C- 13 C with 1H-1H mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 0.4 283 D 2D 13 C- 13 C with DARR mixing 17.6 T (WB) 12.500 50 20 E 2D 15 N- 13 C with TEDOR mixing 11.7 T (WB) 11.111 14.4 81 F 2D 15 N- 13 C with TEDOR mixing 11.7 T (WB) 11.111 14.4 124 Total Time 3049