e, )2 Crossing Angles In The Beam-Beam Interaction R.H. Siernann* II. PERTURBATION FORMALISM SLAC-PUB-7225

Similar documents
Colliding Crystalline Beams

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (03/lfi?lfibr-~/15/1998):

+.V) eo(o) -2 so - sx. hngc)90w3-- Beam-beam collisions and crossing angles in RHIC*

AC dipole based optics measurement and correction at RHIC

Abstract. results that address this question for the main linacs of the NLC. We will show that the effects of alignment drifts can indeed be handled.

SPECTRAL FUNCTION CALCULATION OF ANGLE WAKES, WAKE MOMENTS, AND MISALIGNMENT WAKES FOR THE SLAC DAMPED DETUNED STRUCTURES (DDS)'

RESEARCH IN ACCELERATOR PHYSICS (THEORY)

Start-up Noise in 3-D Self-AmpMed

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (06/16/1998-9/15/1998):

Impact of Final-Focus Ground Motion on NLC Luminosity* J. Irwin and F. Zimmermann

Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques

Magnetic Measurements of the Elliptical Multipole Wiggler Prototype

Tell uric prof i 1 es across the Darrough Known Geothermal Resource Area, Nevada. Harold Kaufniann. Open-file Report No.

BASAL CAMBRIAN BASELINE GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION COMPLETED

Diffractive Dijet Search with Roman Pots at CDF

Constant of Motion for a One- Dimensional and nth-order Autonomous System and Its Relation to the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian

INTERMOLECULAR POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND HIGH RESOLUTION MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY OF WEAKLY BOUND COMPLEXES. Final Progress Report

N. Tsoupas, E. Rodger, J. Claus, H.W. Foelsche, and P. Wanderer Brookhaven National Laboratory Associated Universities, Inc. Upton, New York 11973

(4) How do you develop an optimal signal detection technique from the knowledge of

1 GeV CW nonscaling FFAG for ADS, and magnet parameters

4kU. Measurement of Storage Ring Motion at the Advanced Light Source. QSTt ERNESTORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEYNATIONAL LABORATORY

YUNGSu TSAI. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford, California ABSTRACT

National Accelerator Laboratory

Modeling Laser and e-beam Generated Plasma-Plume Experiments Using LASNEX

Optimization of NSLS-II Blade X-ray Beam Position Monitors: from Photoemission type to Diamond Detector. P. Ilinski

GA A23736 EFFECTS OF CROSS-SECTION SHAPE ON L MODE AND H MODE ENERGY TRANSPORT

The NLC Positron Source*

NONPERTURBATIVE RENORMALIZATION OF QED IN LIGHT-CONE QUANTIZATION* J. R. Hiller

August 3,1999. Stiffness and Strength Properties for Basic Sandwich Material Core Types UCRL-JC B. Kim, R.M. Christensen.

GA A26686 FAST ION EFFECTS DURING TEST BLANKET MODULE SIMULATION EXPERIMENTS IN DIII-D

UNDERSTANDING TRANSPORT THROUGH DIMENSIONLESS PARAMETER SCALING EXPERIMENTS

ust/ aphysics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA

LUMINOSITY REQUIREMENTS FOR HIGGS RESONANCE STUDIES AT THE FIRST MUON COLLIDER*

Three-Dimensional Silicon Photonic Crystals

Beam Dynamics Activities at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Jefferson Lab)

GA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIII-D

LQSAlamos National Laboratory

Undulator Interruption in

Alex Dombos Michigan State University Nuclear and Particle Physics

sample-specific X-ray speckle contrast variation at absorption edges $ & ~ 0

GA A27806 TURBULENCE BEHAVIOR AND TRANSPORT RESPONSE APPROACHING BURNING PLASMA RELEVANT PARAMETERS

M. Lee, Y Cai, J. Corbett, H. Shoaee, D. Whitturn, G. White, Y. Yan Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, California Y.

Scaling between K+ and proton production in nucleus-nucleus collisions *

National Accelerator Laboratory

National Accelerator Laboratory

DE '! N0V ?

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

FUSION WITH Z-PINCHES. Don Cook. Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185

W. Fischer and M. Okamura Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA

GA A26474 SYNERGY IN TWO-FREQUENCY FAST WAVE CYCLOTRON HARMONIC ABSORPTION IN DIII-D

Analysis of Shane Telescope Aberration and After Collimation

Survey, Alignment and Beam Stability at the Advanced Light Source

--62/y. Univ. of Maryland LANSCE-1. Preprint LA-UR &&=-470Zd3- Title: STABILITY AND HALO FORMATION IN AXISYMMETRIC INTENSE BEAMS

Design of Current Leads for the MICE Coupling Magnet

Spin States Separation Based on the Longitudinal Stern-Gerlach Effect

PLASMA MASS DENSITY, SPECIES MIX AND FLUCTUATION DIAGNOSTICS USING FAST ALFVEN WAVE

Summary Report: Working Group 5 on Electron Beam-Driven Plasma and Structure Based Acceleration Concepts

Peak Reliability Delivering near real-time phase angle deltas using Inter-Control Center Communication Protocol (ICCP)

GA A25853 FAST ION REDISTRIBUTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE HYBRID REGIME

LANSCE-1. Preprint LAUR Title: COMPARISON OF BEAM-POSITION-TRANSFER FUNCTIONS USING CIRCULAR BW-POSITION MONITORS

SciDAC CENTER FOR SIMULATION OF WAVE-PLASMA INTERACTIONS

A NEW TARGET CONCEPT FOR PROTON ACCELERATOR DRIVEN BORON NEUTRON CAPTURE THERAPY APPLICATIONS* Brookhaven National Laboratory. P.O.

GA A23713 RECENT ECCD EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON DIII D

Final Technical Report. Department of Energy. for

GA A24166 SUPER-INTENSE QUASI-NEUTRAL PROTON BEAMS INTERACTING WITH PLASMA: A NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION

National Accelerator Laboratory

A Geological and Geophysical Assessment of the Royal Center Gas Storage Field in North-Central Indiana, a Joint NIPSCO, DOE & GRI Case Study

TOWARDS EVEN AND ODD SQUEEZED NUMBER STATES NIETO, MICHAEL M

Applications of Pulse Shape Analysis to HPGe Gamma-Ray Detectors

Curvature of a Cantilever Beam Subjected to an Equi-Biaxial Bending Moment. P. Krulevitch G. C. Johnson

CQNl_" RESPONSE TO 100% INTERNAL QUANTUM EFFICIENCY SILICON PHOTODIODES TO LOW ENERGY ELECTRONS AND IONS

GA A26057 DEMONSTRATION OF ITER OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS ON DIII-D

GA A27235 EULERIAN SIMULATIONS OF NEOCLASSICAL FLOWS AND TRANSPORT IN THE TOKAMAK PLASMA EDGE AND OUTER CORE

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Multi-Scale Chemical Process Modeling with Bayesian Nonparametric Regression

RECXWH2 W/o s3-1

Excitations of the transversely polarized spin density. waves in chromium. E3-r 1s

Hyperon Particle Physics at JHF. R. E. Mischke

National Accelerator Laboratory

Bulk Modulus Capacitor Load Cells

Capabilities for Testing the Electronic Configuration in Pu

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Walter P. Lysenko John D. Gilpatrick Martin E. Schulze LINAC '98 XIX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 23-28,1998

RWM FEEDBACK STABILIZATION IN DIII D: EXPERIMENT-THEORY COMPARISONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER

ION EXCHANGE SEPARATION OF PLUTONIUM AND GALLIUM (1) Resource and Inventory Requirements, (2) Waste, Emissions, and Effluent, and (3) Facility Size

GA A22689 SLOW LINER FUSION

Understanding the Nonlinear Beam Dynamics of the Advanced Light Source

SOLAR SEMIDIURNAL TIDAL WIND OSCILLATIONS ABOVE THE CART SITE. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY

Using the X-FEL to understand X-ray Thomson scattering for partially ionized plasmas

8STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF HIGH EXPLOSIVE DETONATION DATA. Beckman, Fernandez, Ramsay, and Wendelberger DRAFT 5/10/98 1.

Two-Screen Method for Determining Electron Beam Energy and Deflection from Laser Wakefield Acceleration

Plutonium 239 Equivalency Calculations

A Distributed Radiator, Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Confinement Fusion Target with Realistic, Multibeam Illumination Geometry

COHERENT DIPOLE SYNCHRO-BETATRON BEAM-BEAM MODES IN ASYMMETRIC RING COLLIDERS

D. Trbojevic, A.J. Stevens, M.A. Harrison, E Dell, and S. Peggs Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA

Clifford K. Ho and Michael L. Wilson Sandia National Laboratories. P.O. Box Albuquerque, NM

Laser Intensity Modulation by Nonabsorbing Defects. M. D. Feit A. M. Rubenchik

Laser-Modulator System

GA A THERMAL ION ORBIT LOSS AND RADIAL ELECTRIC FIELD IN DIII-D by J.S. degrassie, J.A. BOEDO, B.A. GRIERSON, and R.J.

Transcription:

19980407 036 SLAC-PUB-7225 July, 1996 Crossing Angles In The Beam-Beam Interaction COBF- G ~ o, ~ J E I - - R.H. Siernann* Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University,Stanford, CA 94309 USA ABSTRACT A Hamiltonian perturbation analysis of the beam- beam interaction with a horizontal crossing angle is performed. The beam-beam tune shifts and resonances that result from a crossing angle are determined. Figure 1: Beams crossing at -an angle 29. 1. INTRODUCTION Many storage ring colliders are being designed to reach high luminosity through the use of a large number of closely spaced bunches. This introduces a potential problem of parasitic collisions near the interaction point, but these parasitic collisions can be avoided by having the beams cross at an angle rather than head-on (Figure 1). The contributions to the tune shifts and the beambeam resonances introduced by a crossing angle are analyzed in this paper. The beam-beam interaction with a crossing angle has been studied by a number of authors, [l]- [4]. This paper is closest to that of Sagan et a1 [23 which obtained some of the results presented here. The notation and method are discussed extensively in references 151 and [61. II. PERTURBATION FORMALISM The Hamiltonian of a particle in beam 1 is where Ho is the Hamiltonian of the transverse motion in the absence of the beam-beam interaction,?bb is the beam-beam potential, N is the number of particles in beam 2, r, is the classical particle radius, and y is the energy in units of rest energy. The betatron motions in the absence of the beam-beam interaction can be written in terms of the action-angle variables (Ix, yx) (I,,, yy)of the unperturbed Hamiltonian, Ho, The sum is over all turns and the variables in this equation are: a~ = the RMS bunch length of beam 2; s = coordinate along the reference orbit; C 3 the collider circumference; c i speed of light; and z = displacement of the collision point given in terms of the synchrotron oscillation amplitude,?,and tune, Q, by z 7 = -c0~(21tnq,). A 2 The potential VF depends at the displacements of the particle from the center of beam 2 where a, and oy are the RMS transverse sizes of beam 2. Using the expressions in eq. (1) as approximations for the betatron motions and assuming that the crossing is in the x-dimension, the potential can be rewritten (ssin 29 + J2p,1, 20; +q COS e, )2 Fourier transforming the x expression with respect to s gives These expressions are used in a perturbation analysis of -- VRR. The beam-beam potential is * Work supported by the Department of Energy, contract DE-ACO3-76SFOO515. Presented at the 1996 DPFDPB Summer Study on New Directions for High-Energy Physics (Snowmass '96), Snowmass, COSJune 25-July 12,1996

DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

t I Following the usual procedure of Fourier transforming VBB with respect to yx,yy and s gives an expression for VBB in terms of Fourier coefficients each of which is, related to the resonance PQx +IQy + mqs = n where p, r, m, and n are integers. Making a change of variables = o/sin2cp this expression is 5 VBB =-1 C m.n,p,r=--0 xexp(-(kp, x exp(i(pv, + y - 210 - mqs)s/ C)).?dt;UH(Ix.Iy.C) -00 +csin2~p)~ot/8) x imjm((kp +csin2cp)?c/2) x exp(i(pvx + yy- 210 - mqsh / C)) where The second term in the Taylor series is -, m,n,p,r=-=--o and k, = 2x(n- mqs)/ C+ p(l/ +r(l /P; & -2 7 ~ /c) ~ 0. -2xQxo /C) The quantities and P; are the p-functions at the where collision point, and Qxo and 4.0 are the tunes in the absence of the beam-beam interaction. + mqs = n occurs for The resonance pqx + values of the tune where the phase is stationary, i.e. + vy- 2Nn - mqsh / C)= 0, ds and the average value of the beam-beam potential is given by the term in the series with p = r = m = n = 0. Perform a Taylor expansion in powers of sin29 d -(pvx (5) Equations (2) - (5) contain the results. These frightening looking expressions can be inteqreted to give useful information about the beam-beam interaction. The first term in the Taylor Series is III. DISCUSSION A. Tune Shifts The tune shifts as a function of amplitude are 2

r. B. Beam-Beam Resonances 1 where (VBB) is given by eqs. (2) - (5) evaluated with p = r = m = n = 0. The tune shifts are the Same as for head-on collisions because there are no contributions from the second term in the Taylor series, the term proportional to sin29. This follows from the parity of the Ox integrands. In the case of AQ, the integral is Possible resonances can determined from the parity of the integrands in eqs. (3) and (5). The integrand of eq. (3) is an even function of 8, and an even function of 8,. The only allowed resonances for head-on collisions must have both p and r equal to even integers. The integrand of eq. (5) is an odd function of ex and an even function of 8,. The allowed resonances must have r equal to and even integer and p equal to an odd integer. The crossing angle has introduced new beam-beam resonances that have odd horizontal order and Fourier 2A expansion coefficients propoxtional to sin 29. There are 21 p COS^^, dqy- jd0,cosoxexp{20, x2 + q }=0 both betatron, m = 0, and synchrobetatron, m f 0, 0 resonances. The appearance of odd order betatron resonances can be understood because there is a phase because the argument is an odd function of Ix.The of IC across the interaction region. The shift horizontal tune shift, AQ,, is proportional to synchrobetatron resonances arise from modulation introduced by the synchrotron oscillations. They depend on the synchrotron amplitude and have zero Fourier expansion coefficient when? = 0 21,px cos2 8, C.Remarks d0,cos 3 8,exp 20: + q The crossing angle has not changed the tune shifts, so the beam-beam footprint, the area of the tune plane Evaluating the integrals AQ, = 0 because the arguments occupied by the beam, is the same as for head-on of both integrals are odd functions of e,. collisions. The effect of the crossing angle has been to The tune shifts from the head-on collisions have been introduce odd horizontal order resonances. These calculated in numerous references and are given here for additional resonances could lower the beam-beam limit. completeness. They are TeV33 is considering using both horizontal and vertical crossing angles. The vertical crossing angle will introduce odd order vertical resonances as well, and there is a still larger probability of a reduced beam-beam limit.. IV. REFERENCES and The functions Bx,...,A, are [l] A. Piwinski, DESY Report DESY 77/18 (1977). [2] D. Sagan. R. Siemann and S. Krishnagopal, PLQL pf the 2nd EPAC, 1649 (1990). [3] D. V. Pestrikov, KEK Preprint 93-16 (1993). [4] K. Hirata, Phys Rev Lett 74,2228, (1995). [5] R. H. Siemann, Eront'iers of Particle BeamS; Factories with e+drings (Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Physics, Volume 425 edited by M. Dienes, M. Month, B. Strasser and S. Turner), 327 (1994). [6] R. H. Siemann, Informal note "Extension of Beam-Beam Calculations in SLAC-PUB-6073". The variables in these equations are R = by/crx;5, and 5, are the beam-beam strength parameters; and E, and E, are the emittances. The functions 1; are related to modified Bessel functions Ik(x) = e-'i,(x). 3

I49 b01 Publ. Date (11) Sponsor Code (18) b@e/ xf I E k, DOE