In a D-dimensional Hilbert space, a symmetric informationally complete POVM is a

Similar documents
The tilde map can be rephased as we please; i.e.,

Ph 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 20 October 2006

Qudit Entanglement. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA. The University of Queensland, QLD 4072 Australia.

Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 768 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871

Stochastic Quantum Dynamics I. Born Rule

and extending this definition to all vectors in H AB by the complex bilinearity of the inner product.

The Bloch Sphere. Ian Glendinning. February 16, QIA Meeting, TechGate 1 Ian Glendinning / February 16, 2005

1 More on the Bloch Sphere (10 points)

Kähler configurations of points

Introduction to quantum information processing

Introduction to Quantum Information Hermann Kampermann

Qutrit Entanglement. Abstract

Homework 3 - Solutions

Unambiguous Quantum State Discrimination

Any pure quantum state ψ (qubit) of this system can be written, up to a phase, as a superposition (linear combination of the states)

CS/Ph120 Homework 1 Solutions

Ph 219/CS 219. Exercises Due: Friday 3 November 2006

Introduction to Quantum Computing

Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 3

1 Readings. 2 Unitary Operators. C/CS/Phys C191 Unitaries and Quantum Gates 9/22/09 Fall 2009 Lecture 8

Probabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling. Abstract

4. Two-level systems. 4.1 Generalities

Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem

C/CS/Phys 191 Quantum Gates and Universality 9/22/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 8. a b b d. w. Therefore, U preserves norms and angles (up to sign).

MP 472 Quantum Information and Computation

CS286.2 Lecture 13: Quantum de Finetti Theorems

On the Relation between Quantum Discord and Purified Entanglement

Experimental generalized contextuality with single-photon qubits: supplementary material

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 6 Solutions 3/23/05

2. Review of Linear Algebra

Quantum Nonlocality Pt. 4: More on the CHSH Inequality

Quantum Entanglement and Error Correction

Quantum Computation. Alessandra Di Pierro Computational models (Circuits, QTM) Algorithms (QFT, Quantum search)

Realization of positive-operator-valued measures using measurement-assisted programmable quantum processors

Special Conformal Invariance

Problem Set # 8 Solutions

Bell inequality for qunits with binary measurements

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta

Introduction to Quantum Error Correction

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 27 Jul 2005

Unitary Dynamics and Quantum Circuits

The Convex Hull of Spin Coherent States

Random qubit-states and how best to measure them

. Here we are using the standard inner-product over C k to define orthogonality. Recall that the inner-product of two vectors φ = i α i.

Physics 239/139 Spring 2018 Assignment 6

Some Bipartite States Do Not Arise from Channels

A remarkable representation of the Clifford group

Quantum Computing Lecture 3. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Anuj Dawar

arxiv: v2 [math-ph] 7 Feb 2017

CS286.2 Lecture 15: Tsirelson s characterization of XOR games

5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis:

Information quantique, calcul quantique :

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 11 Nov 2005

Introduction to quantum information processing

The Adaptive Classical Capacity of a Quantum Channel,

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Unextendible Product Bases, Uncompletable Product Bases and Bound Entanglement

On the power of unentangled measurements on two antiparallel spins

Qubits vs. bits: a naive account A bit: admits two values 0 and 1, admits arbitrary transformations. is freely readable,

G : Quantum Mechanics II

Consistent Histories. Chapter Chain Operators and Weights

Ph 219b/CS 219b. Exercises Due: Wednesday 4 December 2013

Ph 219b/CS 219b. Exercises Due: Wednesday 11 February 2009

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 17 Aug 2017

Supplementary Figure 1 Simulated field patterns according to experimental results in

Homework 3. 1 Coherent Control [22 pts.] 1.1 State vector vs Bloch vector [8 pts.]

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

Lecture Notes for Ph219/CS219: Quantum Information Chapter 2. John Preskill California Institute of Technology

Singlet State Correlations

+ py 1v + py 1 v + qy 1 v = 0

1 Traces, Traces Everywhere (5 points)

arxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 13 Aug 2014

Energy Level Sets for the Morse Potential

Quantum Chaos and Nonunitary Dynamics

Physics 4022 Notes on Density Matrices

Restricted Numerical Range and some its applications

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 19 Jan 2007

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 17 Dec 2007

Combined systems in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics

Lecture 9: Phase Estimation

Rotations and Angular Momentum

Lecture 4: Postulates of quantum mechanics

Wigner s Little Groups

Quantum boolean functions

Introduction to Quantum Computing

Entanglement and Symmetry in Multiple-Qubit States: a geometrical approach

Lecture 3: Hilbert spaces, tensor products

Quantum Information and Quantum Noise. Gabriel T. Landi University of São Paulo

k times l times n times

Lecture A2. conformal field theory

AQI: Advanced Quantum Information Lecture 6 (Module 2): Distinguishing Quantum States January 28, 2013

Equal Superposition Transformations and Quantum Random Walks

Coherence and optical electron spin rotation in a quantum dot. Sophia Economou NRL. L. J. Sham, UCSD R-B Liu, CUHK Duncan Steel + students, U Michigan

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 7 Apr 2014

Quantum Information Theory

Quantum Information Types

Prob (solution by Michael Fisher) 1

Discrete Variable Representation

Transcription:

To: C. A. Fuchs and P. Rungta From: C. M. Caves Subject: Symmetric informationally complete POVMs 1999 September 9; modified 00 June 18 to include material on G In a -dimensional Hilbert space, a symmetric informationally complete POVM is a set of one-dimensional projectors Π = ψ ψ, = 1,...,, satisfying the I/ is dictated by taking the trace and I = 1 Π = 1 ψ ψ 1 trπ Π β = ψ ψ β = µ for β. We can easily derive the value of µ by squaring Eq. 1 and taking the trace of the result = tri = 1 trπ Π β = 1 + µ 1.,β This gives µ = 1 + 1. 4 It is easy to show that the projectors Π are linearly independent. [This is required for an informationally complete POVM; in this symmetric case, we need not assume it since it follows from Eqs. 1 and.] Suppose that 0 = c Π. 5 This implies that for each β, 0 = c ψ β Π ψ β = c β + µ β and, hence, that c = 1 µ c β + µ c = 1 c β + + 1 c, 6 c β = 1 c A 7 is independent of β. But then Eq. 7 shows that A = 0 and thus that all the c β s are zero. We conclude that the projectors Π are linearly independent, and there being of them, they make up an operator basis. Another property that we get for free is the following. Consider the superoperator G = Π Π = ψ ψ ψ ψ. 8 1

Applying this operator to one of the projectors, we get GΠ β = Π ψ ψ β = Π β + 1 + 1 β Π = + 1 Π β + 1 + 1 = Πβ + I. + 1 Π 9 Since the projectors Π β are a complete set of operators, this implies that G is the special superoperator G = I + I, 10 + 1 which is specified up to a scale factor by the properties i G = G = G = G # and ii G commutes with all unitaries, i.e., U U G U U = G. The scale factor comes from TrG =. We can now find the left-right inverse of G in the following way. Use I = I I/ + T = I/ + T, where T is the left-right projector onto trace-free operators, to write G in terms of its left-right eigendecomposition G = I + from which it easy to find the inverse: G 1 = 1 This allows us to write and I = G 1 G = + 1 T = I I + + 1 T, 11 I I + + 1 T = I + + 1 T = 1 + 1I I. 1 Q G 1 Π = 1 + 1Π I 1 Q Π = 1 + 1Π Π I Π. 14 If you didn t like the derivation of this equation, it can easily be checked as follows: 1 + 1Π Π I Π = + 1 G I I = I + I I = I. 15

Equation 14 is the result we are looking for. It allows us to write any state ρ in the form ρ = I ρ = + 1Π I Π ρ = + 1Π I trπ ρ = p + 1Π I 16 = I + + 1 p ψ ψ = + 1p 1 ψ ψ, where p = trπ ρ/ is the probability to find result. Putting it slightly differently, we can also write ρ + I + 1 = p ψ ψ. 17 Notice that q = Q ρ = trq ρ = + 1p 1 18 is a normalized quasidistribution, since it is generally takes on negative values. Any informationally complete POVM generates measurement probabilities p and a unique quasidistribution q that comes from expanding the state in terms of the projectors in the POVM. Symmetric informational complete POVMs have a uniquely simple relation between the measurement probabilities and the quasidistribution, which allows one to write down immediately the quasidistribution expansion of an arbitrary state in terms of the measurement probabilities. For = qubits we can write Π = 1 I + n σ, 19 and the universal value, µ = 1/, of the inner product translates to n n β = 1 for β. 0

This means that the four Bloch vectors lie at the vertices of a tetrahedron. One choice is n 1 = e, θ = 0, φ arbitrary, 8 n = 9 e 1 1 e, cos θ = 1/, cosθ/ = 1/, sinθ/ = /, φ = 0, n = 9 e 1 + e 1 e, cos θ = 1/, cosθ/ = 1/, sinθ/ = /, φ = π/, n 4 = 9 e 1 e 1 e, cos θ = 1/, cosθ/ = 1/, sinθ/ = /, φ = π/. 1 Using the convention n = e iφ/ cosθ/ 0 + e iφ/ sinθ/ 1, we have n 1 = 0, n = 1 0 + 1, n = e iπ/ 1 0 + e iπ/ 1, n 4 = e iπ/ 1 0 + e iπ/ 1. For = qutrits, we can use the following nine pure states to construct the onedimensional projectors I believe Bill Wootters thought up these states; I certainly got the 4

idea from him: ψ 1 = 1 1 +, θ = π/, φ = π/4, χ1 = 0, χ = 0, ψ = 1 ω 1 + ω, ψ = 1 ω 1 + ω, ψ 4 = 1 1 +, ψ 5 = 1 ω 1 + ω, ψ 6 = 1 ω 1 + ω, θ = π/, φ = π/4, χ 1 = π/, χ = 4π/, θ = π/, φ = π/4, χ 1 = 4π/, χ = π/, θ = π/4, φ = 0, χ1 = 0, χ arbitrary, θ = π/4, φ = 0, χ 1 = 4π/, χ arbitrary, θ = π/4, φ = 0, χ 1 = π/, χ arbitrary, 4 ψ 7 = 1 +, θ = π/4, φ = π/, χ1 arbitrary, χ = 0, ψ 8 = 1 ω + ω, ψ 9 = 1 ω + ω, θ = π/4, φ = π/, χ 1 arbitrary, χ = 4π/, θ = π/4, φ = π/, χ 1 arbitrary, χ = π/, where ω e πi/ 5 and the coördinates are those of the Bloch-sphere-like representation of qutrit states. The 5

corresponding Bloch vectors are n 1 = e 1 + 1 e 8, n = 4 e 1 + 4 e + 1 e 8, n = 4 e 1 4 e + 1 e 8, n 4 = 4 e + e 4 1 4 e 8, n 5 = 4 e 4 e 4 + 4 e 5 1 4 e 8, n 6 = 4 e 4 e 4 4 e 5 1 4 e 8, n 7 = 4 e + e 6 1 4 e 8, n 8 = 4 e 4 e 6 + 4 e 7 1 4 e 8, n 9 = 4 e 4 e 6 4 e 7 1 4 e 8. 6 By virtue of 1 4 = µ = trπ Π β = 1 1 + n n β for β, 7 we have that that these vectors satisfy n n β = 1 8 for β. 8 Notice that you can t do the = 4 case by taking the tensor product of the tetrahedral vectors for two qubits. 6