COMPARISON OF CUBICAL AND SIMPLICIAL DERIVED FUNCTORS IRAKLI PATCHKORIA arxiv:1011.4870v1 [math.kt] 22 Nov 2010 Abstract. In this note we prove that the simplicial derived functors introduced by Tierney and Vogel [TV69] are naturally isomorphic to the cubical derived functors introduced by the author in [P09]. We also explain how this result generalizes the well-known fact that the simplicial and cubical singular homologies of a topological space are naturally isomorphic. 1. Introduction In [TV69] Tierney and Vogel for any functor F: C B, where C is a category with finite limits and a projective class P, and B is an abelian category, constructed simplicial derived functors and investigated relationships of their theory with other theories of derived functors. Namely, they showed that if C is abelian and F is additive, then their theory coincides with the classical relative theory of Eilenberg-Moore [EM65], whereas if C is abelian and F is an arbitrary functor, then it gives a generalization of the theory of Dold-Puppe [DP61]. Besides, they proved that their derived functors are naturally isomorphic to the cotriple derived functors of Barr-Beck ([BB66], [BB69]) if there is a cotriple in C that realizes the given projective class P. The key point in the construction of the derived functors by Tierney and Vogel is that using P-projective objects and simplicial kernels, for every C from C a P-projective pseudosimplicial resolution can be constructed, which is a C-augmented pseudosimplicial object in C and which for a given C is unique up to a presimplicial homotopy. In [P09] using pseudocubical resolutions instead of pseudosimplicial ones we constructed cubical derived functors for any functor F: C B, where C is a category with finite limits and a projective class P, and B is an abelian category. It was shown that if C is an abelian category, F an additive functor, and P is closed, then our theory coincides with the theory of Eilenberg- Moore [P09, 4.4]. However, there remained an open question whether the Tierney-Vogel simplicial derived functors and our cubical derived functors are isomorphic in general or not. In this paper we give a positive answer to this question. More precisely, we prove the following Theorem 1.1. Suppose C is a category with finite limits, P a projective class in C in the sense of [TV69, 2], B an abelian category, and F: C B a functor. Let L nf: C B, n 0, be the Tierney-Vogel simplicial derived functors of F, and L nf: C B, n 0, the cubical derived functors of F. Then there is an isomorphism which is natural in F and in C. L nf(c) = L nf(c), C C, n 0, 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 18G10, 18E25, 18G30, 18G25, 55N10. Key words and phrases. derived functor, normalized chain complex, presimplicial object, projective class, projective pseudocubical resolution, pseudocubical object. 1
Comparison of cubical and simplicial derived functors The main idea of the proof goes back to Barr and Beck [BB69]. The point is that passing to the unique additive extension F ad : ZC B of the functor F, where ZC denotes the free preadditive category generated by C, one verifies that the Eilenberg-Moore derived functors of F ad (with respect to the class P) restricted to C are naturally isomorphic to the simplicial derived functors of F on the one hand and to the cubical derived functors of F on the other hand. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 the relative Eilenberg-Moore derived functor theory of additive functors is reviewed from [EM65]. In Section 3 we recall the theory of Tierney- Vogel and prove that the simplicial derived functors of F: C B are just the Eilenberg- Moore derived functors of F ad : ZC B restricted to C. Section 4 is devoted to the definition and properties of pseudocubical normalization functor for an idempotent complete preadditive category. Note that the pseudocubical normalization is the main technical tool used in Section 5 to prove that the cubical derived functors of F: C B are naturally isomorphic to the Eilenberg-Moore derived functors of F ad : ZC B restricted to C. In the final section we briefly indicate that Theorem 1.1 generalizes the classical fact that the simplicial and cubical singular homologies of a topological space are naturally isomorphic. 2. Partially defined Eilenberg-Moore derived functors The following definitions are well-known. Definition 2.1. A preadditive category is a category A together with the following data: (i) For any objects X,Y in A, the set of morphisms Hom A (X,Y) is an abelian group; (ii) For any morphisms f,g: X Y, h: W X and u: Y Z in A, the following hold (f +g)h = fh+gh, u(f +g) = uf +ug. In other words, a preadditive category is just a ring with several objects in the sense of [M72]. Definition 2.2. Let A be a preadditive category. An augmented chain complex over an object A A (or just a complex over A) is a sequence n C n C n 1 2 C 2 1 C 1 0 C 0 A such that n n+1 = 0, n 0. Definition 2.3. Let A be a preadditive category and P a class of objects in A (which need not be a projective class in any sense). A complex 2 C 2 1 C 1 0 C 0 A over A A is said to be P-acyclic if for any Q P the sequence of abelian groups Hom A (Q,C 1 ) 1 Hom A (Q,C 0 ) 0 Hom A (Q,A) 0 is exact. 2
Irakli Patchkoria Definition 2.4. Let A be a preadditive category and P a class of objects in A. A P-resolution of an object A A is a P-acyclic complex over A with P n P, n 0. P 2 2 P 1 1 P 0 0 A Note that an object A A need not necessarily possess a P-resolution. There is a comparison theorem for P-resolutions which can be proved using the standard homological algebra arguments (see e.g. [W94, 2.2.7]). More precisely, the following is valid. Proposition 2.5 (Comparison theorem). Let P A be a complex over A A consisting of objects of P, and let S B be a P-acyclic complex. Then any morphism f: A B can be extended to a morphism of augmented chain complexes P f A f S B. Moreover, any two such extensions are chain homotopic. Suppose A is a preadditive category, P a class of objects in A, B an abelian category, F: A B an additive functor, and A the full subcategory of those objects in A which possess P-resolutions. Recall that Proposition 2.5 allows one to construct the left derived functors L P n F : A B, n 0, of F with respect to the class P as follows. If A A, choose (once and for all) a P-resolution P A and define L P n F(A) = H n(f(p )), n 0. Remark 2.6. If P is a projective class in the sense of [EM65], then L P n F, n 0, are exactly the derived functors introduced in [EM65, I.3]. Note that in this case A = A, i.e., the functors L P n F are defined everywhere. Further we recall Definition 2.7 ([EM65, I.2]). Let A be a preadditive category and P a class of objects of A. A sequence X f in A is said to be P-exact if gf = 0 and the sequence of abelian groups Y g Z Hom A (P,X) f Hom A (P,Y) g Hom A (P,Z) is exact for any P P. Definition 2.8 ([EM65, I.2]). A closure of a class P, denoted by P, is the class of all those objects Q A for which Hom A (Q,X) f Hom A (Q,Y) g Hom A (Q,Z) is exact whenever X f Y g Z is P-exact. 3
Comparison of cubical and simplicial derived functors Clearly, P P and P-exactness is equivalent to P-exactness. In particular, P = P. Note that if a preadditive category A has a terminal object, then any P-resolution is a P- resolution as well. This together with 2.5 implies the following Proposition 2.9. Let A be a preadditive category with a terminal object, P a class of objects in A, B an abelian category, F: A B an additive functor, and A an object in A which possesses a P-resolution. Then there is a natural isomorphism L P n F(A) = L P n F(A), n 0. 3. Simplicial derived functors and Eilenberg-Moore derived functors In this section we briefly review the construction of simplicial derived functors from [TV69, 2] and show that they can be obtained as derived functors of an additive functor. Let us recall the following definitions. Definition 3.1. A presimplicial object S in a category C is a family of objects (S n C) n 0 together with morphisms in C satisfying the presimplicial identities i : S n S n 1, n 1, 0 i n, i j = j 1 i, i < j. Definition 3.2. Let S be a presimplicial object in a preadditive category A. The unnormalized chain complex K(S) associated to S is defined by = K(S) n = S n, n 0, n ( 1) i i : K(S) n K(S) n 1, n > 0. i=0 The presimplicial identities imply that 2 = 0. Now let C be a category with finite limits, P a projective class in C in the sense of [TV69, 2], B an abelian category, and F: C B a functor. The simplicial derived functors L n F of F with respect to the class P are defined as follows. For any object C C, choose (once and for all) a P-projective presimplicial resolution S C of C (i.e., a P-exact presimplicial object S augmented over C with S n P, n 0) and define L nf(c) = H n (K(F(S))), n 0. By the comparison theorem for projective presimplicial resolutions [TV69, (2.4) Theorem], the objects L nf(c) are well-defined and functorial in F and C. We will now show that the derived functors L nf can be obtained as derived functors of some additive functor. First recall 4
Irakli Patchkoria Lemma 3.3. Let S S 1 be an augmented presimplicial set. Suppose that 0 : S 0 S 1 is surjective and the following extension condition holds: For any n 0 and any collection of n+2 elements x i S n, 0 i n+1, satisfying i x j = j 1 x i, 0 i < j n+1, there exists x S n+1 such that i x = x i, 0 i n+1. Then the augmented chain complex K(Z[S]) 0 Z[S 1 ] is chain contractible (Z[X] denotes the free abelian group generated by X). In particular, it has trivial homology in each dimension. The proof is standard (one constructs inductively a presimplicial contraction). Example 3.4. Let S C be a P-projective presimplicial resolution of C and suppose Q P. Then the augmented presimplicial set Hom C (Q,S) Hom C (Q,C) satisfies the conditions of 3.3. In particular, the homologies of the augmented chain complex K(Z[Hom C (Q,S)]) Z[Hom C (Q,C)] vanish. Now suppose again that C is a category with finite limits, P a projective class in C, B an abelian category, and F: C B a functor. Let ZC denote the free preadditive category generated by C [M72, 1], i.e., the objects of ZC are those of C, and for any objects C and D in C, Hom ZC (C,D) is the free abelian group generated by Hom C (C,D). The composition of morphisms in ZC is induced by that in C. Clearly, C is a subcategory of ZC. Further, since the category B is abelian (and therefore additive), the functor F: C B can be uniquely extended to an additive functor F ad : ZC B. The following proposition relates the simplicial derived functors of F to the Eilenberg-Moore derived functors of F ad. Proposition 3.5. Let C be a category with finite limits, P a projective class in C, B an abelian category, and F: C B a functor. Then: (i) For any P-projective presimplicial resolution S C, the augmented chain complex K(S) C in ZC is a P-resolution of C in the sense of Definition 2.4. (ii) For any C C, there is a natural isomorphism L n F(C) = L P n F ad(c), n 0. 5
Comparison of cubical and simplicial derived functors Proof. The first claim immediately follows from 3.4 and the definition of ZC. The second claim is a consequence of the first one and the definition of F ad. Indeed, if S C is a P-projective presimplicial resolution of C, then we have L n F(C) = H n(k(f(s))) = H n (F ad (K(S))) = L P n F ad (C). Remark 3.6. Proposition 3.5 is essentially due to Barr and Beck [BB69, 5]. More precisely, in the case when the projective class P comes from a cotriple (see [TV69, 3]) the above statement is proved in [BB69, 5]. (The cotriple derived functor theory of Barr-Beck is a special case of the Tierney-Vogel theory [TV69 3].) Thus 3.5 is a simple generalization of the result of Barr and Beck. 4. Pseudocubical objects in idempotent complete preadditive categories Definition 4.1 ([P09, 2.2]). A pseudocubical object X in a category C is a family of objects (X n C) n 0 together with face operators i, 0 i 1 : X n X n 1, n 1, 1 i n, and pseudodegeneracy operators s i : X n 1 X n, n 1, 1 i n, satisfying the pseudocubical identities i α j ε = j 1 ε i α i < j, α,ε {0,1}, and for α {0,1}. s j 1 i α i < j, i α s j = id i = j, s j i 1 α i > j, Important examples of pseudocubical objects appear in a natural way: Let C be a category with finite limits and P a projective class in C. Then for any object C C, there is a P-exact augmented pseudocubical object X C with X n P, n 0, called P-projective pseudocubical resolution of C (see [P09, 3] for details). In [P09] we use the normalized chain complex of a pseudocubical object in an abelian category to define the cubical derived functors. (Note that the normalized chain complex of a cubical object in an abelian category was introduced by Światek in [Ś75].) Below we recall the definition and some properties of the normalized chain complex of a pseudocubical object in the general setting of idempotent complete preadditive categories. These are needed to prove a cubical analog of Proposition 3.5 in the next section. 6
Irakli Patchkoria Definition 4.2. A preadditive category A is said to be idempotent complete if any idempotent p : E E in A (i.e., p 2 = p) has a kernel. That is, there is a morphism i: Ker(p) E with pi = 0, and for any morphism f: F E, satisfying pf = 0, there is a unique morphism g: F Ker(p) such that ig = f. The following two propositions are well known (see e.g. [K78]). Proposition 4.3. Let A be an idempotent complete preadditive category and p: E E an idempotent in A. Then there is a diagram such that π 1 π Ker(p) 2 E Ker(1 p) i 1 i 2 π 1 i 1 = 1, π 2 i 2 = 1, π 1 i 2 = 0, π 2 i 1 = 0, i 1 π 1 = 1 p, i 2 π 2 = p. In particular, the coproduct Ker(p) Ker(1 p) exists in A and is isomorphic to E. Proposition 4.4. Let A be a preadditive category. Then there exists an idempotent complete preadditive category A and a full additive embedding ϕ: A Ã satisfying the following universal property: For any idempotent complete preadditive category D and an additive functor ψ : A D, there is an additive functor ψ : A D which makes the diagram A Ã ψ ψ D commute up to a natural equivalence, and which is unique up to a natural isomorphism. Let X be a pseudocubical object in an idempotent complete preadditive category D. Definition 4.5. The unnormalized chain complex C(X) associated to X is defined by = ϕ C(X) n = X n, n 0, n ( 1) i ( i 1 i): 0 C(X) n C(X) n 1, n > 0. i=1 The pseudocubical identities show that 2 = 0. Moreover, they imply that the morphisms σ X n = (1 s 1 1 1)(1 s 2 1 2) (1 s n 1 n): X n X n, n 0, (σ 0 = 1) are idempotents and form an endomorphism of the chain complex C(X). We denote this endomorphism by σ X : C(X) C(X). 7
Comparison of cubical and simplicial derived functors Since (σ X ) 2 = σ X and the category D is idempotent complete, the chain map σ X has a kernel Kerσ X in the category of non-negative chain complexes in D. Furthermore, by 4.3, there is a diagram in the category of chain complexes π 1 Ker(σ X π 2 ) C(X) Ker(1 σ X ) i 1 such that π 1 i 1 = 1, π 2 i 2 = 1, π 1 i 2 = 0, π 2 i 1 = 0, i 1 π 1 = 1 σ X, i 2 π 2 = σ X. Definition 4.6. Let X be a pseudocubical object in an idempotent complete preadditive category D. The chain complex Ker(1 σ X ), denoted by N(X), is called the normalized chain complex of X. Remark 4.7. If D is an abelian category, then N(X) admits the following description: i 2 N(X) 0 = X 0, N(X) n = n Ker( 1 i=1 i), n > 0, n = ( 1) i+1 i 0 : N(X) n N(X) n 1, n > 0. i=1 Thus in the abelian case one does not need pseudodegeneracies to define N(X). Next, we recall the construction of cubical derived functors from [P09, 3]. Let C be a category with finite limits, P a projective class in C, B an abelian category, and F: C B a functor. Then the cubical derived functors L nf of F with respect to the class P are defined as follows. For any object C C, choose (once and for all) a P-projective pseudocubical resolution of C and define X C L n F(C) = H n(n(f(x))), n 0. The comparison theorem for precubical resolutions [P09, 3.3] and the homotopy invariance of the functor N [P09, 3.6] imply that the objects L nf(c) are well-defined and functorial in F and C. Note that one cannot use the unnormalized chain complex C(X) instead of N(X) to define the cubical derived functors [P09, 3.8]. The following lemma is the main technical tool for proving a cubical analog of Proposition 3.5. Lemma 4.8. Let F: D D be an additive functor between idempotent complete preadditive categories. Then for any pseudocubical object X in D, there is a natural isomorphism of chain complexes in D. F(N(X)) = N(F(X)) Proof. Applying the additive functor F to the diagram π 1 Ker(σ X π 2 ) C(X) Ker(1 σ X ) = N(X), i 1 i 2 8
Irakli Patchkoria we get a digram in D F(Ker(σ X )) F(π 1) C(F(X)) F(i 1) whose morphisms satisfy the following identities: F(π 2) F(i 2) F(N(X)) F(π 1 )F(i 1 ) = 1, F(π 2 )F(i 2 ) = 1, F(π 1 )F(i 2 ) = 0, F(π 2 )F(i 1 ) = 0, F(i 1 )F(π 1 ) = 1 F(σ X ), F(i 2 )F(π 2 ) = F(σ X ). Besides, it follows from the additivity of F that F(σ X ) = σ F(X), and hence we obtain F(i 2 )F(π 2 ) = σ F(X). This finally implies that F(N(X)) = Ker(1 σ F(X) ) = N(F(X)). 5. Cubical derived functors and Eilenberg-Moore derived functors Let C be a category with finite limits, P a projective class, B an abelian category, and F: C B a functor. In this section we prove that for any object C C, there is a natural isomorphism L nf(c) = L P n F ad (C), n 0. This together with 3.5 obviously implies Theorem 1.1. The proof of this isomorphism is similar to that of 3.5. However, things become a little bit complicated in the cubical setting as we have to consider normalized chain complexes in order to get the right homology. Proposition 5.1. Suppose A is a preadditive category, P a class of objects in A, B an abelian category, and F: A B an additive functor. Suppose further that P is the closure of the class P in the idempotent completion A, and F: A B the extension of F. Then for any A A which possesses a P-resolution, there is a natural isomorphism L P n F(A) = L P n F(A), n 0. Proof. Since A has a zero object, any P-resolution in A is a P-resolution in Ã. The rest follows from 2.9. Corollary 5.2. Assume that C ia a category with finite limits, P a projective class in C, B an abelian category, and F: C B a functor. Assume further that F ad : ZC B is the extension of F ad : ZC B to the idempotent completion ZC, and P the closure of P in ZC. Then for any object C C, there is a natural isomorphism L P n F ad(c) = L P n F ad (C), n 0. 9
Comparison of cubical and simplicial derived functors Next we state the following technical Lemma 5.3. Let X X 1 be an augmented pseudocubical set. Suppose that : X 0 X 1 is surjective and the following conditions hold: (i) For any x,y X 0, satisfying x = y, there exists z X 1 such that 1 0z = x and 1 1 z = y. (ii) For any n 1 and any collection of 2n+2 elements x ε i X n, 1 i n+1, ε {0,1}, satisfying i α xε j = ε j 1 xα i, 1 i < j n+1, α,ε {0,1}, there exists x X n+1, such that ix ε = x ε i, 1 i n+1, ε {0,1}. Then the augmented normalized chain complex N(Z[X]) Z[X 1 ] is chain contractible. In particular, it has trivial homology in each dimension. We omit the routine details of the proof here. Note only that the main idea is to construct inductively a precubical homotopy equivalence between X and the constant cubical object determined by X 1 and then use the homotopy invariance of the functor N [P09, 3.6]. Example 5.4. LetX C be a P-projective pseudocubical resolution ofc and supposeq P. Then the augmented pseudocubical set Hom C (Q,X) Hom C (Q,C) satisfies the conditions of 5.3. In particular, the homologies of the augmented chain complex N(Z[Hom C (Q,X)]) Z[Hom C (Q,C)] vanish. We are now ready to prove the main result of this section. Proposition 5.5. Let C be a category with finite limits, P a projective class in C, B an abelian category, and F: C B a functor. Then: (i) For any P-projective pseudocubical resolution X C, the augmented chain complex N(X) C in the category ZC is a P-resolution of C in the sense of 2.4. (P is the closure of P in ZC.) (ii) For any C C, there is a natural isomorphism L nf(c) = L P n F ad (C), n 0. Proof. For all n 0, N(X) n P since N(X) n is a retract of X n and P is closed under retracts. Further, by 4.8, one has a natural isomorphism of augmented chain complexes Hom ZC (Q,N(X)) Hom ZC (Q,C) = N(Z[Hom C (Q,X)]) id Z[Hom C (Q,C)] 10
Irakli Patchkoria for any Q P. It follows from 5.4 that the lower chain complex is acyclic and thus so is the upper one. Consequently, the augmented chain complex N(X) C in ZC is P-acyclic or, equivalently, P-acyclic. This completes the proof of the first claim. Let us prove the second claim. By 5.2, it suffices to get a natural isomorphism L n F(C) = L P F n ad (C). Choose any P-projective pseudocubical resolution X C. The first claim together with 4.8 gives L nf(c) = H n (N(F(X)) = H n (N( F ad (X))) = H n ( F ad (N(X))) = L P F n ad (C). Clearly, Theorem 1.1 is an immediate consequence of 3.5 and 5.5. 6. Connection with topology In this section we briefly explain that Theorem 1.1 generalizes the well-known fact that the cubical and simplicial singular homologies of a topological space are naturally isomorphic. For the definition and basic properties of the cubical singular homology see [M80]. Let Top denote the category of topological spaces, and let n, n 0, be the standard n- simplex. The class P of all possible disjoint unions of standard simplices is a projective class in Top in the sense of [TV69, 2]. (Moreover, in fact, it comes from a cotriple [BB69, (10.2)].) Indeed, for any space Y, the map n Y, n 0 n Y, where the disjoint union is taken over all possible continuous maps n Y, n 0, is a P - epimorphism. Consider the functor F: Top Ab, F(Y) = H 0 (Y,A) = Z[π 0 Y] A, where Ab is the category of abelian groups, H (Y,A) the simplicial singular homology of Y with coefficients in an abelian group A, and π 0 Y the set of path components of Y. It follows from [BB69, (10.2)] and [TV69, (3.1) Theorem] that there is a natural isomorphism L nf(y) = H n (Y,A), n 0, where the simplicial derived functors are taken with respect to the projective class P (cf. [R69], [R72]). We sketch the proof of this natural isomorphism along the lines of [BB69, (10.2)]. The standard cosimplicial object gives rise to an augmented simplicial functor F F, F n (Y) = Z[Hom Top ( n,y)] A. Further, suppose S Y is a P -projective presimplicial resolution of Y. Evaluating F on S yields a bipresimplicial abelian group. It is easily seen that both resulting spectral sequences collapse at E 2. Finally, playing these two spectral sequences against each other gives the desired isomorphism. 11
Comparison of cubical and simplicial derived functors Similarly, one can describe the cubical singular homologieshn (Y,A) as cubical derived functors of the functor F(Y) = Z[π 0 Y] A. For this one uses the class P consisting of all possible disjoint unions of standard cubes. The class P is a projective class in Top and there is a natural isomorphism L n F(Y) = Hn (Y,A), n 0, where the cubical derived functors are taken with respect to P. The proof of this isomorphism is technically a little bit complicated compared to its simplicial counterpart as one has to consider spectral sequences of bipseudocubical objects and take care of the normalizations. Note that the class P = P P is also a projective class in Top. Obviously, the simplicial derived functors with respect to the class P are naturally isomorphic to the simplicial derived functors with respect to P. On the other hand, the cubical derived functors with respect to the class P are naturally isomorphic to the cubical derived functors with respect to P. Thus, by 1.1, there is a natural isomorphism for any topological space Y, i.e., L n F(Y) = L nf(y), n 0, H n (Y,A) = H n (Y,A), n 0. References [BB66] M. Barr, J. Beck, Acyclic models and triples, Proc. Conf. Categor. Algebra, La Jolla 1965, (1966), 336-343. [BB69] M. Barr, J. Beck, Homology and standard constructions, Lecture notes in mathematics, Springer, 80, (1969), 245-335. [DP61] A. Dold, D. Puppe, Homologie nicht-additiver Funktoren. Anwendungen, Ann. Inst. Fourier, 11, (1961), 201-312. [EM65] S. Eilenberg, J. C. Moore, Foundations of relative homological algebra, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 55, (1965). [K78] M. Karoubi, K-theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, (1978). [M80] W.S. Massey, Singular homology theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, (1980). [M72] B. Mitchell, Rings with several objects, Advances in Math., 8, (1972), 1-161. [P09] I. Patchkoria, Cubical resolutions and derived functors, Preprint, avaliable on arxiv.org see the following link: http://128.84.158.119/abs/0907.1905, (2009). [R69] G. S. Rinehart, Satellites and cohomology, J. Algebra., 12, (1969), 295-329. [R72] G. S. Rinehart, Singular homology as a derived functor, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 174, (1972), 243-256. [Ś75] A. Świątek, Kategorie obiektów kostkowych, preprint nr 27, Toruń, (1975). [TV69] M. Tierney, W. Vogel, Simplicial resolutions and derived functors, Math. Zeit., 111, (1969), 1-14. [W94] C. A. Weibel, An introduction to homological algebra, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. 38., Cambridge Univ. Press. (1994). Mathematisches Institut Universität Bonn Endenicher Allee 60 53115 Bonn, Germany E-mail address: irpatchk@math.uni-bonn.de 12