!" #$ " %& '"( Gerbera jamesonii.# "

Similar documents
Correlation and path coefficient analysis in tuberose

Genetic Divergence Studies for the Quantitative Traits of Paddy under Coastal Saline Ecosystem

ADIOLUS GLADIOL. Jitendra Kumar*, Rakesh Kumar and Krishan Pal

Irrigation water salinity limits faba bean (Vicia faba L.) photosynthesis

Response of olive trees (cv. Koroneiki) to algae extract sprays and its impact on growth and productivity under saline conditions

Effect of 1-MCP on Water Relations Parameters of Well-Watered and Water-Stressed Cotton Plants

Received: October Accepted: November. Abstract

Pepper cultivation on a substrate consisting of soil, natural zeolite and olive mill waste sludge-changes in soil properties

The Chemistry of Salinity in Soils. Naomi Waissman Assadian Texas A&M Research and Extension Center at El Paso September 4, 2002

THE EFFECTS OF FOLIAR APPLICATION OF SALICYLIC ACID ON QUALITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE YIELD OF WHEAT UNDER SALINE CONDITIONS

Impact of Gypsum and Sulfuric Acid Application on Cotton Yield under Saline Sodic Soil Condition in Melka Sadi Irrigated Farm

Optimization of Dehydration Techniques for Colour Retention and Other Qualitative Attributes of Gerbera (Gerbera hybrida) cv.

Prediction of leaf number by linear regression models in cassava

Effect of nitrogen application on nitrogen absorption, distribution and yield of Stra wberry

N Management in Potato Production. David Mulla, Carl Rosen, Tyler Nigonand Brian Bohman Dept. Soil, Water & Climate University of Minnesota

The Study of Improvement of Dispersive Soil Using Magnetic Field

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DOSES OF GLYCINE BETAINE AND TIME OF SPRAY APPLICATION ON YIELD OF COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.)

CURRICULUM VITAE. Education and training. Awarding Institution. Academic Year. College of Science, Biology. Basrah / Iraq College of Science,

GIS ASTER ASTER. * GIS

Effect of 1-MCP on Ethylene Synthesis and Development of Cotton Flowers under Normal and High Temperature

Boron Desorption Kinetic in Calcareous Soils

Understanding and Interpreting Soil and Plant Tissue Lab Reports

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department UC Davis One Shields Ave. Davis, CA (530)

Effect of Nitrogen and Diphenylamine on Gladiolus hybrida cv. Sancerre Production

C.v. Dr. Mohammed Ali Hussein

Genetic Analysis for Heterotic Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Using Six Parameters Model

Study on Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) Tuber Dormancy and its Control Through Combined Application of Growth Regulator and Herbicides

STANDARDIZATION OF BLENDED NECTAR USING BANANA PSEUDOSTEM SAP AND MANGO PULP SANTOSH VIJAYBHAI PATEL

Genetic variability, Heritability, Genetic Advance and Correlation Coefficient for Vegetative and Floral Characters of Gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii)

Quantifying the Value of Precise Soil Mapping

The response of native Australian seedlings to heat and water stress. Mallory T. R. Owen

Some changes in germination and morphological traits of black seed under different soil types and common bean densities

Effects of bulb temperature on development of Hippeastrum

EFFECT OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS ON GROWTH AND YIELD PARAMETERS OF PAPRIKA cv.ktpl-19

HIND AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE

Effect of saline culture on the concentration of Na +, K + and Cl in Agrostis tolonifera

Department of Agriculture, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran. Corresponding author: Hamidreza Mobasser

CRITICAL PETIOLE POTASSIUM LEVELS AS RELATED TO PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF CHAMBER- GROWN COTTON TO POTASSIUM DEFICIENCY

CHEMISTRY ELEMENTS, COMPOUNDS & MIXTURES

EVALUATION OF SPAD AND LCC BASED NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IN RICE (Oryza sativa L.) Abstract

; CO 2, Effect of CO 2 enrichment on the growth and photoautotrophic capability of grape ( Vitis L. ) plantlet in vitro

THE EFFECT OF TABEX AND LACTOFOL ON SOME PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ORIENTAL TOBACCO

Genetic Variability and Heritability Estimation in Water Spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk.) Genotypes

Development of High Yielding Saffron Mutant

Foliar Application of Gibberelic Acid on Growth and Flowering of Gerbera Cultivars

NEW DIAGRAM USEFUL FOR CLASSIFICATION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY

Assessment of Ground Water in a Part of Coastal West Bengal using Geo-Electrical Method

Remote Sensing as a Tool to Manage Nitrogen for Irrigated Potato Production

Genetic Parameters for Sorghum Varieties in Different Population Densities

Molecular Weight and boiling point

Evaluation and Variability of Some Genotypes of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) for Horticultural Traits

Properties and Management of Soil Damaged by the 2011 Huge Tsunami in Eastern Japan

Early Atomic Theory and Structure

Effect of spraying with Liquorice Roots Extract and Vitamin C on some vegetative and flowering parameters of Stock plant Mathiola incana L.

e Crop Management in Sugarcane... easi g Cane, Sugar and Jaggery Yields Souvenir Proceedings

Improving Tolerance of Vachellia farnesiana Plants to Irrigation Water Salinity by Using Bio-Inocula under Sandy Soil Conditions

Estimates of Variability for Growth and Yield Attributes in Taro (Colocasia esculenta var. Antiquorum (L.) Schott)

!" #$ %& (Capsicum annuum L.)

EFFECT OF DROUGHT STRESS ON PHYSIOLOGICAL GROWTH PARAMETERS OF TOMATO INBRED LINES AT GERMINATION STAGE

Adel Sepehry, Davoud Akhzari, Mohammad Pessarakli and Hossein Barani. School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

(Benjamin, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5)

Common Effects of Abiotic Stress Factors on Plants

Examination into the accuracy of exchangeable cation measurement in

Weathering: the disintegration, or breakdown of rock material

The World Ocean - II

Effect Of Inoculation Of Vam Fungi On Enhancement Of Biomass And Yield In Okra. Maruti S. Darade

Curriculum Vitae {CV}

(iii) Use the diagram to determine the value (mol 2 dm 6 ) of K w at 50 C. [1]

Evaluation of Physio-Agronomic and Chemical Traits in Relation to The Productivity of Eggplant (Solanum Melongena L.)

Model Analysis for Growth Response of Soybean

those in Arizona. This period would extend through the fall equinox (September 23, 1993). Thus, pending variation due to cloudiness, total light flux

Growth of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) seedlings sown in soil mixed with nitrogen and natural zeolite

Drought Tolerant Criterion of Wheat Genotypes Using Carbon Isotopes Discrimination Technique

Effect of Electrical Conductivity of the Soil Solution on Stem Elongation in Fertigated Roses

Genetic variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance for Yield, Yield Related Components of Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.

USING LINE TESTER ANALYSIS TO DEVELOP NEW SOURCE OF CYTOPLASMIC MALE STERILE LINE IN HYBRID RICE

A Desertification Impact on Siwa Oasis: Present and Future Challenges.

STUDY ON GENETIC DIVERSITY OF POINTED GOURD USING MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS. Abstract

Click to edit Master title style Effect of seed and foliar treatments on vigor of soybean plants Jerseyville, IL

Numerical Data. Effect of copper on nutrients content (mg g 1 dry wt.) of radish (45th day) N P K Na Ca Mg

Relationships between Soil salinity and geopedological units in Saveh plain, Iran

EXOGENOUS ABA AND HEIGHT CONTROL IN THREE PEPPER TYPES

Agronomy 406 World Climates

Studies on genetic divergence on cucumber (Cucumber sativum L.)

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

Pak. J. Biotechnol. Vol. 7 (1-2) (2010) ISSN RESPONSES OF DIFFERENT COTTON GENOTYPES UNDER SALINE STRESSED CONDITIONS

A DIELECTRIC STUDY ON HUMAN BLOOD AND PLASMA

THE EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION OF WATER RESOURCES IN HARRAT KHYBAR SAUDI GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED GEOLOGY HYDROGEOLOGY SECTION JEDDAH

Effect of Treating BOUGAINVILLEA GLABRA with Ethrel, Magnesium and Boron on Vegetative and Flowering Traits

Stress induced ethylene production, ethylene binding, and the response to the ethylene action inhibitor 1-MCP in miniature roses

EFFECTS OF PACLOBUTRAZOL ON STOMATAL SIZE AND DENSITY IN PEACH LEAVES

GENE ACTION AND COMPARISON BETWEEN HALF DIALLEL ANALYSES METHODS UNDER SALINE SOIL STRESS CONDITIONS IN SUNFLOWER

PP71DR EXPERIMENTAL SUMMARY Spring Comparison of PGRs for Drench Applications on Sensitive Perennials

SCREENING OF CARNATION VARIETIES AGAINST THRIPS, Thrips tabaci (LINDERMAN) IN PROTECTED CULTIVATION

PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) GENOTYPES UNDER WATER STRESS CONDITIONS AT SEEDLING STAGE

CHEMISTRY - BROWN 13E CH.7 - PERIODIC PROPERTIES OF THE ELEMENTS

Saline and Sodic Soils: Characteristics and Properties

2. Irrigation. Key words: right amount at right time What if it s too little too late? Too much too often?

E. Balaguruswamy. Neeraj Mehta. D.P. Kothari and I.J. Nagrath

Exogenous Application of Abscisic or Salicylic Acid Alleviates Irrigation Water Salinity Stress on Hamelia patens Plants

Transcription:

7463 : 1 (25) (2009)!" #$ " %& '"( Gerbera jamesonii! (2) (1) *- & %,+ ) %*.$ 3! %& (! / )" *! */!!$ 0 * 1" * 7,.'"( 5!!!" %/* ")4 * 2005!" %/* 9& %" : + ;(ds/m) /8"** 4 3 2 1.5 0.758 ") = /" 3'/ $ *.'"( + < 5! @+.,+? ) @ '- = 3-! ) A '/ > & * D E$" F ;#$ "! #B? 4 @ * C 5.08) 4dS/m @ * " &!' D, $ :&)!*" - 5 '"( + &.%? (%1.97 H 6.87;$ 1.8 ;%25.58 ;2* 72.13 ;- "/ %? %1.105 %16.35 (!!*"!!) ), D @ I? 4? %11.09 23.13!*"! 9& * ) ) #$" "! ; < 5! @ * " D %& *"( * ) ), :),!*" :-+ 0.%.%? %0.887 1.420 ;2.086 ;2.415 ") 0.758 ds/m. : ) (1). "! (2).# " 63

... # #)* $% & '( *-,+ Influence of magnetized saline irrigating Water on vegetative growth of Gerbera jamesonii Sami K.M. Ameen ( 1) and Ali F. Kassim (2) ABSTRACT The study was conducted in lathhouse of Hort. Dept., College of Agric., University of Baghdad during spring season of 2005 to investigate the ability of using magnetized saline water in irrigating Gerbera plant. Two factors were possibility studied; watering plant with saline water (0.758, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 ds/m), and the other factor was the effect of magnetic technology on saline water used in plants irrigation. Split plot according to RCBD with three replicates was designed; each replicate consisted of two pots. High level of saline in irrigating water decreased quality of vegetative characters. Number of leaves; leaves area; chlorophyll percentage, offshoot and fresh and dry weight of leaves of 4 ds/m level were (5.08; 72.13 cm 2, 25.58%; 1.8; 6.87 g and 1.97 g) respectively. Magnetized saline irrigating water increased leaves content of chlorine (16.35%) comparing with untreated irrigating water. However, leaves content of Ca and Na was decreased (23.13 and 11.09%). The least Cl, Ca, Mg and Na levels in the leaves occurred at 0.758 ds/m level were (2.415, 2.086, 1.42 and 0.887%) respectively, while S% was 1,015% at the same saline level. Key Words: Gerbera jamesonii, Magnetic technology, Saline irrigating water, Vegetative growth. (1) (2) College of Agric.- Horticulture Department- University of Baghdad. College of Agric.- University of Tikrit. 64

7463 : 1 (25) (2009) /. Compositae +",- Gerbera jamesonii # $ 01 23 /0 0 2, & 4. 5" # / $0% 7& 8 1.3 / # ".67 &* 5" $*% $% 5.. 1 " 4. 9 : #. / 2".6 ;,- #?& $ :7 1 $" $ #>=. / 5& & <" #0= 07%.B 2" $% $3 / %65 @7. $03 /0. 6 300 G. / (FAO) C3 D +*&- 0& 0 1& :) @ $!" H>)..! I7 &* 350 @ $% 1 & # I>'%.(2003 $) 13 4,0& I0 3 / $% 1000 # / $% I.(2005 /J /&) 5* D%& $% / $% 3000,- & 9* K. B 2 / $% /- # #'! #0 '3 9 #,-.= + & # G),- 90C 5 9> / 1& 97 L+* /&, 9" G Blake 2000 Hilal Hilal).0 /0 0 7 L H>3.(2000 H>03 9C, 5! G /,- (1995) Takachenko = /0J /0& D0&8 0 C 7 /)",- 9* / 0 3 97 $% I" #' M 2 7 / / (2005) 9*0& P0) - Q= O 5. N- $% (5.81dS/m) & 4 /.4 G 7% %32.8 7 9*& P) /& $% %56.1 7 50,0- R & 4 / (2005) /J 1% (2000) /J Khattab. $%.%15 7 )* 5 9*& & / (@ 6) 9> (9*) #!, $0% 0,0- # & 5 / D&8 %20 15 10 5 0 $. 0& 4 2 /. - /- /O #)* 1 R.9%! & 6 /?& /0. *0 /0 4& /& $% / # R& P),- #0 0% 5 / $% 4 " '( (2006) 65

... # #)* $% & '( *-,+ (5.1dS/m) (6*) 9, (1.1dS/m) 1 2O) - )* 5 01 0 2)?& # 9 $% I" #'! / 6 0 P),- # & / (1999) Grattan Maas.9, P& 5,- G 9% R& / #! #> 0* 90& $0% :O & '( # $% Abscisic acid G3 9C, 9" /,- (2005) Kronenberg =.9%.# / 4. + *" O / H>3 / 1 " # $% & 4 / 5)8,- 4. 61. + *" / 23 R& #)* $% G '( %" J/A' F! /) # - #, 2005/12/1 2005/4/15 / #) 0 20 0.! L0* $% ( & $% # 100..(1)9 $% + +) B)*, &.*! A) A E! (1) : / */ I 2.40 / 0.00 / 97.60 9 %! ") 21.25 # 0.40 " 5 : K*" 2.10 ECe ds/m 7.56 ph 67.10 N 35.00 P L) / L 690.00 K 12.81 Ca++ 10.00 Mg++ 27.00 Na+ 2.60 Cl - /: 4.00 -- SO 4 4.55 - HCO 3 7% #TU& * 66

7463 : 1 (25) (2009) 10* 0& /0 # # #= :$. ds/m / +1 0.758 $+01 90* /0 (.=) @= $7 :93 R (S 1 ) B 1.5 ds/m 9* :$' R S 0 B ds/m (S 2 ) B 2 ds/m 9* :?' R (S 3 ) B 3 ds/m 9* :; R.(S 4 ) B 4 ds/m 9* :Q R. & #, 9*& 6) Q3 9& O& B0 " C & 4 # $7 1% Q $' 9" V0 0 #.M 1 B 1 " 4 G # $7 M 0 4000 B0! 50= M0- (2) 4! (magnetron) / 9> /,0 #0' ;0! 5& 5 1 9> - ' (gauss) QC.1 G ( / R& Q,) & # # #.#>0" @& # 9 C / 9 200 %V (.=0W )& ) + +) #)* P" (2) 9 /.." 9! 4dS/m * #0 Split plot 7= ;7 * (2 5) #) R0& ;!?>' ;! (RCBD) +=" #7 @ 2% #>" :0 90& + ;7 & # #& - /**, & /0 LSD 0" 20% 9! 9" # #!. ' ;7 ".%5 9& R, #>" / +*&Y 2).2005/12/1 Z 1 #7 # 67

... # #)* $% & '( *-,+ -" KA " :!- ds/m M " A) A E! (2) :.7! '"( 4 )! M 0.758 "!*" /"** %(!*" /"** %( 8/! :!-! :!- 0.89 7.8 7.73 2.41 7.65 7.47 W ph 2.20 4.90 4.00 0.13 0.759 0.758 / EC 0.85W 2.544 2.566 12.8 395 453 /[ TDS 12.76W 820 940 12.28 498.5 610 NTU 5" 6.86W 226.03 242.70 7.85 161.10 174.83 /[ 5" 0.03 3.3495 3.3483 5.32 3.17 3.01 910/\ 0.0 1.3343 1.3343 0.007 1.3340 1.3339 W 9" 8 0.02W 1.0020 1.0023 0.08 0.9971 0.9979 9/\ %' 1.91W 73.12 74.55 2.07 68.62 70.07 // = $& 4.40W 0.737 0.771 2.24 0.698 0.714 G 3.12W 0.434 0.448 4.17 0.69 0.72 /\ 0.0 6.5 6.5 W 3.50 3.50 /[ N 37.5W 0.5 0.8 W 0.2 0.2 /[ P 0.0 3.31 3.31 2.34 1.67 1.71 /[ K+ 1.66 1679 1651 16.02 86.15 102.59 /[ Cl- 8.27W 207.49 226.22 17.37 144.71 175.14 /[ -- SO 4 10.29 92.03 82.56 9.29 92.33 101.79 /[ - HCO 3 2.55 969.21 944.44 13.65 57.28 50.40 /[ Na + 6.87W 90.41 97.08 W 69.93 69.93 /[ Ca ++ 0.0 60.16 60.16 1.99 29.11 29.70 /[ Mg ++ 0.0W 3.7 3.7 W W W /[ - BO 3 #$ " %& '"( 1 40 0 23 $% " 2% (AW3) 9 / D&> =0.%21.71 # 5 (M 0 ).= " 7 (M 1 ) & 90" $% " P),- R & 4 # /,- (BW3) 9 P0)8 # " 2% 1D $.= #/23 9) A!A1 "N 68

7463 : 1 (25) (2009) /0 & # / 9 /..= 7 %69.21W34.36 /0 01 #>" $% 23 P) 7% )* 4. $% '( $% I" 0 90! / /& $%! 16.83 [ - S0M1 " $% 2],.(CW3 9)! 4.50 [ - S 4 M 0 " # $% 2]!!" #$ " %& 9"! :$ '"( (3) : A D, D, $ (H) & (H)!' (!" ) :&) % 6.12 21.91 2.3 35.02 7.19 25.15 2.9 32.522.9 NS NS NS 2.32 11.95 6.17 7.46 5.73 1.97 2.06 11.93 11.98 4.37 7.98 7.06 7.85 4.96 6.51 2.31 1.63 2.92 47.49 21.76 22.15 19.38 6.87 8.87 45.86 49.12 18.18 25.34 24.64 19.66 17.25 21.50 3.61 10.14 12.55 3.3 3.2 2.8 2.1 1.8 0.8 3.0 3.5 2.8 3.5 2.5 3.0 1.7 2.5 1.6 2.0 1.2 B C 39.93 33.32 36.70 33.33 25.58 3.99 42.51 37.33 30.27 36.37 36.40 37.00 33.50 33.15 32.40 18.75 5.64 * 2 ( *) - 305.71 362.48 51.60 753.94 329.30 276.17 238.94 72.13 142.28 685.79 8.22.09 282.36 376.24 267.72 284.61 236.87 241.00 55.80 88.45 201.22 D (!") 10.98 12.58 1.54 16.50 10.83 15.50 11.00 5.08 3.96 16.17 16.83 10.00 11.65 14.25 16.75 10.00 12.00 4.50 5.65 5.60 '"( '"( < M 0 '"( M 1 L.S.D. 0.05 * (/"*) (0.768) S 0 (1.5) S 1 (2) S 2 (3) S 3 (4) S 4 L.S.D. 0.05 * '"( M 0 M 1 M 0 M 1 M 0 M 1 M 0 M 1 M 0 M 1 S 0 S 1 S 2 S 3 S 4 0.05L.S.D. 07 %15.66 0! &,- (M 1 ) 4 # $0% I&0 I0" I) (BW3) 9 1D (A-3) 9 M 0 " #0& 5 @ S 0 " 2 #!)?& & @! & "! & $% I I 9 '( /.%81.12W56.32 / 69

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

7463 : 1 (25) (2009) 0 $&0 =0 +) #)* $% (2002 Rao) & /J Colic) =C] 2 91 (2 9) %' B0 @ > : 9 9% L* 9*& (1998.(2005 Kronenberg) 3 *" L* 5 0 P) ; 7% & 9") #=K P) @ K0 23 $% (4 9) * # ;,- I>' 23 P) /.(2000 Nilsen David) /*" /. 17,- 0> 03 0 :)8 "! & '(! & 01 0! ' / :,- 4! B 23.! &, Q" 1!,-. K! > $8 $0 '(0,- G @ " 23 $% P)! 9% / / 0 #0> = #* / / K #3 = $% H>] #> 9 =. 2% #> $% I.= @,0- R 0 # & $% I8 # & / *! /.(1989 6&*) #>! 23 & * #03 $0 03 '(0,- ;! & '( #) 0 # 9 # / / $% 9>?&% * 0.(2004 /J /)1. > 7 # $% I 'K 9 9!" 3 5,- ; 7% @ 23 / P).2 > $% A1( ", D @ %& '"( * 2 $0% 0 + $% " 5,- (AW4) 9 ^+ = #0 5 /.%16.35 # 5 2 #0) / 8-23 $% 5,- # & #0 / 0" (S 4 ) 0" $% %2.888 #,& $& R 5 0 0& /0 90 '( /.(BW4 9) (S 1 ) " $% %3.378 0" 0 0, # 23 $% 5 $% I".(CW4 9) %3.813 # S 1 M 1 /& $% (AW4 9) # / 23 R& $% I" 'K 0! 23 $0% *0". $% I #'! & / / " S 4 " # 2 $% %0.717 #,& & 5 P)8 / 9 /.(BW4 9) (.=) " # 2 $% %1.015 # S 0 71

... # #)* $% & '( *-,+ 0, # *". / 23 R& $% '( $% I I" /" 0 %0.673 # *" 9! # /& $% S 0 M 1 " %1.073.(CW4 9) S 4 M 0 "!!" + @ %& 9"! :$ '"( (4) : A1( " E!, A % '"( Na Mg Ca S Cl 1.235 1.511 2.706 0.869 2.742 '"( < M 0 1.098 1.574 2.080 0.810 3.278 '"( M 1 0.085 NS 0.104 NS 0.161 L.S.D. 0.05 B * % (ds/m) Na Mg Ca S Cl 0.887 1.420 2.086 1.015 2.415 (0.768) S 0 1.138 1.501 2.325 0.941 3.378 (1.5) S 1 1.114 1.537 2.374 0.812 3.276 (2) S 2 1.115 1.650 2.928 0.715 3.093 (3) S 3 1.578 1.606 2.253 0.717 2.888 (4) S 4 0.127 1.164 0.266 0.155 0.190 L.S.D. 0.05 C * % '"( Na Mg Ca S Cl 0.997 1.507 2.207 0.957 2.545 M 0 0.777 1.333 1.965 1.073 2.285 M 1 S 0 1.285 1.485 2.680 1.103 2.943 M 0 0.990 1.517 1.970 0.780 3.813 M 1 S 1 1.375 1.499 2.758 0.887 2.993 M 0 0.853 1.575 1.990 0.737 3.560 M 1 S 2 1.240 1.640 3.445 0.730 2.705 M 0 0.990 1.660 2.410 0.700 3.480 M 1 S 3 1.277 1.427 2.440 0.673 2.527 M 0 1.880 1.785 2.065 0.760 3.250 M 1 S 4 0.179 0.233 0.377 0.220 0.269 L.S.D. 0.05 72

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rattan Mass) #0 $% 4 5,- K P) ' / " & 9") : '(,- # P) 0 50 @. 3 % ; # L*8 B) $0%. 5,- " 7% & 9") 23 $% + R0 5 23 $% * + 5 @ ; /& $% /) 23 $% 4 5,- R $% 4 5,- &.(2004 /J 73

... # #)* $% & '( *-,+ REFERENCES 3 E! %& %*! * 5 %*'"( O) +.(2006 ).' 5 ;1 ; )? 4 / * *. I1 : "! A). 195 ;(!., I ; 9" F # #.(2003).P! ;%. 24.(www. azzaman.com) 1689 F! % I ;)!'.%/!'!" 1(.(1989).,* :#& ;O. 260. ;% %*'"( O).(2005). J ' M &!," 9&! %! - ;,* -.8 I7.1 : E<D 5.$.2823 :(1)36 " Q! *.(2004).0)?*,* 8! :#& Q?* + ;,' E 5 Lycopersicom esculentum ''!" %& 7B #$.4540 :D ;(15) ; I!.,! %"D %*'"( O).(2005). J ' M &!,",*! -! % ;9&.'" I1 2 : E<D 5.$.3429 :(1)36 - Blake, W. (2000). Physical and Biological effect of magnet. In: Santwani, M.T. (ed). The art of magnetic healing. B. Jain. India Gyaa.com. India. Colic, M., Chien, A. and Morse. D. (1998). Synergistic application of chemical and electro magnetic water treatment in corrosion and scale prevention. Croatica Chemica Acta. 71(4), 905-916. David, M.O. and Nilsen, E.T. (2000). The physiology of plant under stress. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p-420 Hilal, M. H. and Hilal. M.M (2000). Application of magnetic technology in desert agriculture II- Effect of magnetic treatments of irrigation water on salt distribution in olive and citrus field and induced changes of ionic balance in soil and plant. Egypt. J. Soil Sci. 40(3): 423-435. Khattab, M.D.; El-Torky, M.; Mostafa, M. and Doaa Reela. M.S. (2000). Pretreatment of gladiolus cormels to produce commercial yield: 1- Effect of GA 3, Sea water and magnetic system on the growth and corms production. Alex. J. Agric. Res. 45(3): 181-199. Kronenberg, K.J. (2005). Magneto hydrodynamics: The effect of magnets on fluids GMX international. Mass, E.V. and Grattan. S.R. (1999). Crop yield as affected by salinity. Amer. Society of Agronomy, 677: 55-103. Rao, A. P. (2002). Scalemaster ECO friendly water treatment. Scale-master Adlam Pvt. Ltd. (www.adlams.com/attachment-scal.p.) Takachenko, Y. P. (1995). The application of magnetic technology in agriculture. Magnetizer pp.:9-11. Received 2007/07/ 29 F! C4 Accepted for Publ. 2008/02/ 12 " F! :!- 74