SYMMETRIC UNITS IN MODULAR GROUP ALGEBRAS VICTOR BOVDI. L. G. Kov iic s AND S. K. SEHGAL,

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 2 Mar 2008 Victor Bovdi, Tibor Rozgonyi 1

Unitary units in modular group algebras

TRANSITIVE PERMUTATION GROUPS IN WHICH ALL DERANGEMENTS ARE INVOLUTIONS

COUNTING INVOLUTIONS. Michael Aschbacher, Ulrich Meierfrankenfeld, and Bernd Stellmacher

ANALYSIS OF SMALL GROUPS

Exercises on chapter 1

2-GENERATED CAYLEY DIGRAPHS ON NILPOTENT GROUPS HAVE HAMILTONIAN PATHS

AN AXIOMATIC FORMATION THAT IS NOT A VARIETY

Unipotent automorphisms of solvable groups

SEMI-INVARIANTS AND WEIGHTS OF GROUP ALGEBRAS OF FINITE GROUPS. D. S. Passman P. Wauters University of Wisconsin-Madison Limburgs Universitair Centrum

Algebra SEP Solutions

New York Journal of Mathematics. Cohomology of Modules in the Principal Block of a Finite Group

FINITE GROUPS IN WHICH EVERY ELEMENT IS CONJUGATE TO ITS INVERSE

Sylow 2-Subgroups of Solvable Q-Groups

Odd-order Cayley graphs with commutator subgroup of order pq are hamiltonian

Stab(t) = {h G h t = t} = {h G h (g s) = g s} = {h G (g 1 hg) s = s} = g{k G k s = s} g 1 = g Stab(s)g 1.

Units in Group Rings

arxiv: v3 [math.co] 4 Apr 2011

GROUPS WITH A MAXIMAL IRREDUNDANT 6-COVER #

Abstract Algebra: Supplementary Lecture Notes

GROUP RINGS WITH SOLVABLE «-ENGEL UNIT GROUPS'

PRACTICE FINAL MATH , MIT, SPRING 13. You have three hours. This test is closed book, closed notes, no calculators.

Finite groups determined by an inequality of the orders of their elements

CONSEQUENCES OF THE SYLOW THEOREMS

3-Designs from PSL(2, q)

THE KLEIN GROUP AS AN AUTOMORPHISM GROUP WITHOUT FIXED POINT

Representation Theory

DIGRAPHS WITH SMALL AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS THAT ARE CAYLEY ON TWO NONISOMORPHIC GROUPS

MAXIMAL SUBALGEBRAS AND CHIEF FACTORS OF LIE ALGEBRAS DAVID A. TOWERS

SPHERICAL SPACE FORMS REVISITED

1. Group Theory Permutations.

HOMEWORK Graduate Abstract Algebra I May 2, 2004

Mathematical Journal of Okayama University

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 13 No , M-GROUP AND SEMI-DIRECT PRODUCT

MINIMAL GROUPS WITH ISOMORPHIC TABLES OF MARKS. Margarita Martínez-López, Alberto G. Raggi-Cárdenas, Luis Valero-Elizondo and Eder Vieyra-Sánchez

On Compact Just-Non-Lie Groups

A Note on Subgroup Coverings of Finite Groups

A characterisation of p-soluble groups

INVARIANTS FOR COMMUTATIVE GROUP ALGEBRAS

-- \x if A is a nonsquare;

Implications of the index of a fixed point subgroup

Multiplicative Jordan Decomposition in Integral Group Rings

PROFINITE GROUPS WITH RESTRICTED CENTRALIZERS

arxiv: v4 [math.gr] 17 Jun 2015

ALGEBRA HOMEWORK SET 2. Due by class time on Wednesday 14 September. Homework must be typeset and submitted by as a PDF file.

Group Theory. 1. Show that Φ maps a conjugacy class of G into a conjugacy class of G.

A. (Groups of order 8.) (a) Which of the five groups G (as specified in the question) have the following property: G has a normal subgroup N such that

Locally maximal product-free sets of size 3

On zero-sum partitions and anti-magic trees

Exercises MAT2200 spring 2013 Ark 4 Homomorphisms and factor groups

Groups that are pairwise nilpotent

Rank 3 Latin square designs

ALGEBRA PH.D. QUALIFYING EXAM September 27, 2008

FINITE GROUPS IN WHICH SOME PROPERTY OF TWO-GENERATOR SUBGROUPS IS TRANSITIVE

Pseudo Sylow numbers

The Genus Level of a Group

Permutation representations and rational irreducibility

On orderability of fibred knot groups

On the nilpotent conjugacy class graph of groups

Subgroup Complexes and their Lefschetz Modules

Classifying Camina groups: A theorem of Dark and Scoppola

ALTERNATE PROOFS OF SOME BASIC THEOREMS OF FINITE GROUP THEORY. Yakov Berkovich University of Haifa, Israel

The final publication is available at

A new notion of rank for finite supersolvable groups and free linear actions on products of spheres

Connectivity of Intersection Graphs of Finite Groups

CONSTRUCTING GALOIS 2-EXTENSIONS OF THE 2-ADIC NUMBERS

MAT534 Fall 2013 Practice Midterm I The actual midterm will consist of five problems.

MINIMAL NUMBER OF GENERATORS AND MINIMUM ORDER OF A NON-ABELIAN GROUP WHOSE ELEMENTS COMMUTE WITH THEIR ENDOMORPHIC IMAGES

Extra exercises for algebra

Landau s Theorem for π-blocks of π-separable groups

MODULAR SPECIES AND PRIME IDEALS FOR THE RING OF MONOMIAL REPRESENTATIONS OF A FINITE GROUP #

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS

RESIDUALLY FINITE VARIETIES OF NONASSOCIATIVE ALGEBRAS

On central Frattini extensions of finite groups

AUTOMORPHISMS OF FINITE ORDER OF NILPOTENT GROUPS IV

ON MINIMAL FAITHFUL PERMUTATION REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS

Maximal non-commuting subsets of groups

Section I.6. Symmetric, Alternating, and Dihedral Groups

Sylow structure of finite groups

Centralizers and the maximum size of the pairwise noncommuting elements in nite groups

120A LECTURE OUTLINES

Algebraic Structures Exam File Fall 2013 Exam #1

P. J. Cameron a,1 H. R. Maimani b,d G. R. Omidi b,c B. Tayfeh-Rezaie b

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 1 Jan 2019

Semiregular automorphisms of vertex-transitive cubic graphs

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

School of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5824 Topics in Groups. Problem Sheet I: Revision and Re-Activation

The Outer Automorphism of S 6

Selected exercises from Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote (3rd edition).

SUMMARY ALGEBRA I LOUIS-PHILIPPE THIBAULT

A SIMPLE PROOF OF BURNSIDE S CRITERION FOR ALL GROUPS OF ORDER n TO BE CYCLIC

On the centralizer and the commutator subgroup of an automorphism

A characterization of the Split Cayley Generalized Hexagon H(q) using one subhexagon of order (1, q)

Transitivity of properties of two-generator subgroups of finite groups

The Number of Homomorphic Images of an Abelian Group

NON-NILPOTENT GROUPS WITH THREE CONJUGACY CLASSES OF NON-NORMAL SUBGROUPS. Communicated by Alireza Abdollahi. 1. Introduction

Algebra Exam Syllabus

Algebra. Travis Dirle. December 4, 2016

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 31 Oct 2018

TC10 / 3. Finite fields S. Xambó

Transcription:

COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 24(3), 803-808 (1996) SYMMETRIC UNITS IN MODULAR GROUP ALGEBRAS VICTOR BOVDI Bessenyei Teachers College, 4401 Nyfregyhaza, Hungary L. G. Kov iic s Australian National University, Canberra, A C T 0200, Aus tral i a AND S. K. SEHGAL, University o f Alberta, Edmonton, A l berta T6 G 2G1, Canada ABSTRACT. L e t p be a prime, G a locally finite p-group, K a commutative ring o f characteristic p. T h e anti -automorphism g 1 * g linearly to an anti -automorphism a 1-5 a* o f K G. A n element a o f K G is called symmetric i f a* = a I n this paper we answer the question: f o r which G and K do the symmetric units of K G form a multiplicative group. Let G be a group, K a commutative ring (with 1), and U(KG) the group of units in the group algebra K G. Th e anti-automorphism g g etends linearly to an anti-automorphism a 1-4 a* o f K G ; this etension leaves U( K G ) setwise invariant. A n element a of K G is called symmetric if a* = a It is an open problem to find the noncommutative K G in which the symmetric units form a multiplicative group. Here we solve this under the as- 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. P ri m ary 16S34. V. B ov di is i ndebted to the Univers ity o f A l berta for wa rm hospitality and generous support duri ng a period when part of this work was done. Hi s research was also supported by the Hungarian National Foundation for Scientific Research grant No. T 014279. 803 Copyright 1 9 9 6 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.

804 B O V D I, KOVACS, AND SEHGAL sumption that K has prime characteristic, p say, and G is a locally finite p-group. Our result is the following. Theorem. Let p be a prime, K a commutative ring of characteristic p, and G a nonabelian locally finite p-group. The symmetric units of KG f orm a multiplicative group if and only if p = 2 and G is the direct product of an elementary abelian group and a group H f or which one of the following holds: (i) H has an abelian subgroup A of inde 2 and an element b of order 4 such that conjugation by b inverts each element of A; (ii) H is the direct product of a quaternion group of order 8 and a cyclic group of order 4, o r the direct product of two quaternion groups of order 8; (iii) H is the central product of the group (, y I with a quaternion group of order 8, the nontrivial element common to the two central factors being X (iv) H is isomorphic to one of the groups H32 and H245 defined below. The relevant definitions are: H32 = y H245 = y, u, v I = v y 2y2 [ U, = [v, Note that in case (i) all elements of H outside A have order 4 and so any one of them can serve as b. The list of groups in this theorem is part of the list in Theorem 1.2 of Bovdi and KovAcs [1], and the proof relies heavily on Lemma 1.4 of that paper.

SYMMETRIC UNITS IN MODULAR GROUP ALGEBRAS 8 0 5 The proof of the Theorem will occupy the rest of this note. Set S = f t t E G, t the symmetric elements of K G are precisely the K-linear combinations of the elements of S. Lik e the fied points of any anti-automorphism of any group, the symmetric units form a subgroup in U( K G ) i f and only if they commute wit h each other. I t is well known that once K is of characteristic p and G is a locally finite p-group, the augmentation ideal of K G is locally nilpotent, and so every element congruent to I modulo this ideal is a unit. In particular, 1 g g course, t is a symmetric unit whenever t E G and t the symmetric units form a multiplicative group i f and only if every pair of elements of S commutes. In particular, for a given p this issue is independent of the choice of K It will be convenient t o call a locally finite p-group good if every pair of elements in S commutes (say, in K G wit h K = Z/ p Z). No t e that all abelian groups are good, all subgroups of good groups are good, and that a locally finite p-group is good if all its 2-generator subgroups are good. In a good group, any two involutions (that is, elements of order 2) commute. I f g and t are as in the definition of S, then the only way t and g + g case the subgroup (g,t) generated by g and t is a nonabelian dihedral group and therefore contains noncommuting involutions. This proves that in a good group every involution is central. Net we prove that if g, h are noncommuting elements in a good group G, then there eist, y in G such that (g, h) = y ) and Y To this end, note that any two of g, h, gh generate the nonabelian group (g,h), so by the previous paragraph none of them can have square 1 O n the other hand, g + g g h + h g + h g If gh occurs more than once on the left hand side, we must have gh = so = gh, y = h will do. Otherwise gh must equal one of the summands

806 B O V D I, KOVACS, AND SEHGAL on the right hand side. That summand cannot be hg, for g and h do not commute; nor can it be h which case = g, y = h will work, or gh = h = h, y = g. This already shows that the prime p involved in a nonabelian good group can only be 2. The point established in the second last paragraph can be taken further: in those circumstances, and y can be chosen so that the order of y is 4. To see this, note first t hat ( y ) y + y ) I f the cosets (y) and this forces y to deduce that this is the only nontrivial coset of (y) i n (, y). Groups of 2-power order wit h a cyclic subgroup of inde 2 are well known (see for eample Section 109 in Burnside's book [2]); the nonabelian groups of this kind with all involutions central are precisely the generalized quaternion groups. (We count the quaternion group of order 8 among the generalized quaternion groups.) O f course, each generalized quaternion group can be generated by a pair of elements, y such that Y = We sum up these conclusions in the following. L e mma 1. I f G is a nonabelian good group, then p = 2 and each nonabelian 2-generator subgroup of C is either a generalized quaternion group or a sentidirect product C 2 with m > 2. If m > 2 then there are other semidirect products that might be called C2n1 X C4, but we shall always mean this one. L e mma 2. I f G is a nonabelian good group and the eponent of G is not 4, then G has an abelian subgroup A of inde 2 and an element b of order 4 such that conjugation by b inverts each element of A.

SYMMETRIC UNITS IN MODULAR GROUP ALGEBRAS 8 0 7 Proof. Set A = a E G a ' 1 ). Suppose first that A is nonabelian. Then there are noncommuting elements g, h in A whose orders are greater than 4. In a generalized quaternion group, all elements of order greater than 4 lie in one cyclic subgroup, so (g, h) cannot be a generalized quaternion group. I n a C2m X C4 a l l elements outside y a C2m X a l either. This contradiction to Lemma 1 proves that A must be abelian. Let b be any element of G outside A: by the definition of A, then b' = 1. If a 1, then a and b cannot commute (else we would have (ab) then a, ab E A, b E A would follow, contrary to the choice of b). I n a generalized quaternion group or in a C2m X a a n element of order greater than 4 can only be conjugate to itself or to its inverse, so Lemma i implies that a b It follows from Lemma 1 that if G is a nonabelian good group of eponent 4 and if g, h E G, then ( 9 dihedral. Under somewhat weaker hypotheses, Lemma 1.4 of [1] asserts that G is a direct product of an elementary abelian group and a group H such that either H satisfies one of the conditions (i) (iv) of our Theorem, or H is an etraspecial 2-group, or H is the central product of an etraspecial 2-group wit h a cyclic group of order 4. All central products of this kind and all etraspecial 2-groups ecept the quaternion group contain noncentral involutions, while the quaternion group satisfies condition (i). This completes the proof of the 'only if' part of our Theorem. The proof of the 'if ' part is much easier. Th e definition of good group directly yields that the direct product of an elementary abelian 2-group and a good 2-group is always good: thus it suffices to check that if p = 2 and one of the conditions (i) (iv) holds then H is good. Consider case (i) first. W e have already remarked that in this case all involutions of H lie in A, so they are all central. I f g E A, then g + g commutes with every element of H and is therefore central in K H. I f both

808 B O V D I, KOVACS, AND SEHGAL g and h are elements of H outside A, one can play the role of b and the other can be written as ab wit h a E A, and (b + b (b + - 1 is good. In the other three cases H has eponent 4 and we know (from O'Brien's Lemma 4.1 in [1], or by direct calculation) t hat all involutions in H are central. We can also see that the Frattini subgroup h order 4. Thus if g, h E H, then (g, h) has order at most 16. The groups of order dividing 16 are well known (see for eample Section 118 in [2]); there are only two 2-generator nonabelian groups of eponent 4 among them in which all involutions are central, and bot h of those satisfy condition (i). Thus by the previous paragraph (g, h) is good, and so g + g with h + h. We conclude that H is good in each of these cases. This completes the proof of the Theorem. REFERENCES 1. V i c t o r Bovdi and L. G. Kovacs, Uni tary units i n modul ar group algebras, Manus c ri pta - Math. 84 (1994), 57-72. 2. W. Burnside, Theory of groups o f finite order, second edition, Cambridge University Press, 1911, repri nted by Dov er, 1955. Received: Apr i l 1995