A best approximation property of the generalized spline functions

Similar documents
A Structural Theorem of the Generalized Spline Functions 1

On the efficiency of some optimal quadrature formulas attached to some given quadrature formulas

Subclasses of starlike functions associated with some hyperbola 1

A CLASS OF EVEN DEGREE SPLINES OBTAINED THROUGH A MINIMUM CONDITION

Projection Theorem 1

(g, h, M) convex sets. The problem of the best approximation

Abstract Monotone Operators Representable by Abstract Convex Functions

Fixed point theorems for Ćirić type generalized contractions defined on cyclic representations

Best proximity problems for Ćirić type multivalued operators satisfying a cyclic condition

Approximation of the attractor of a countable iterated function system 1

INDICATIVE PROPOSITIONS

SOME DUALITY THEOREMS FOR LINEAR-FRACTIONAL PROGRAMMING HAVING THE COEFFICIENTS IN A SUBFIELD K OF REAL NUMBERS

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

CHARACTERIZATION OF (QUASI)CONVEX SET-VALUED MAPS

EXISTENCE OF STRONG SOLUTIONS OF FULLY NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS

INEQUALITIES FOR THE NORM AND THE NUMERICAL RADIUS OF LINEAR OPERATORS IN HILBERT SPACES

On a bivariate interpolation formula

COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS FOR MULTIVALUED OPERATORS ON COMPLETE METRIC SPACES

FIXED POINT THEORY FOR MULTIVALUED OPERATORS ON A SET WITH TWO METRICS

SOME PROPERTIES PRESERVED BY WEAK NEARNESS. Adriana Buică

WEAK CONVERGENCE OF RESOLVENTS OF MAXIMAL MONOTONE OPERATORS AND MOSCO CONVERGENCE

a) Articole publicate în reviste din fluxul ştiinţific internaţional principal:

On (M, N)-convex functions

PROFESSOR PETRU BLAGA AT HIS 60 TH ANNIVERSARY

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR PROCESSING OF BIOSIGNALS

ON THE CONVERGENCE OF THE ISHIKAWA ITERATION IN THE CLASS OF QUASI CONTRACTIVE OPERATORS. 1. Introduction

GBS operators of Schurer-Stancu type

GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SOME ALGEBRAIC CURVES. x = x =

Seminar on Fixed Point Theory Cluj-Napoca, Volume 1, 2000, nodeacj/journal.htm

BEST APPROXIMATIONS AND ORTHOGONALITIES IN 2k-INNER PRODUCT SPACES. Seong Sik Kim* and Mircea Crâşmăreanu. 1. Introduction

ABSTRACT AND CONCRETE GRONWALL LEMMAS

An estimation of a generalized divided difference in uniformly convex spaces

Complemented Subspaces in the Normed Spaces

On the diophantine equations of type a x + b y = c z

TWO MAPPINGS RELATED TO SEMI-INNER PRODUCTS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN GEOMETRY OF NORMED LINEAR SPACES. S.S. Dragomir and J.J.

The equivalence between a standard H-cone of functions on a saturated set and Exc U

Existence and data dependence for multivalued weakly Ćirić-contractive operators

The combined Shepard-Lidstone bivariate operator

g-frame Sequence Operators, cg-riesz Bases and Sum of cg-frames

Sang-baek Lee*, Jae-hyeong Bae**, and Won-gil Park***

SOME INEQUALITIES FOR (α, β)-normal OPERATORS IN HILBERT SPACES. S.S. Dragomir and M.S. Moslehian. 1. Introduction

Geometry Problem booklet

EQUICONTINUITY AND SINGULARITIES OF FAMILIES OF MONOMIAL MAPPINGS

On a subclass of n-close to convex functions associated with some hyperbola

CARISTI TYPE OPERATORS AND APPLICATIONS

EXTRACTING FUZZY IF-THEN RULE BY USING THE INFORMATION MATRIX TECHNIQUE WITH QUASI-TRIANGULAR FUZZY NUMBERS

arxiv: v1 [math.oc] 22 Sep 2016

Proof that ker(t) is a Subspace of R n

Solution of a polylocal problem using Tchebychev polynomials

Steepest descent approximations in Banach space 1

U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series A, Vol. 74, Iss. 3, 2012 ISSN SCALAR OPERATORS. Mariana ZAMFIR 1, Ioan BACALU 2

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH REGARDING THE HD RADIAL BEARINGS IN THE CASE OF STATIC CHALLENGING WORKING

V. SUBSPACES AND ORTHOGONAL PROJECTION

AN ORIGINAL METHOD OF PROVING THE FORMULA OF A TRIGONOMETRIC FUNCTION OF A SUM OF ANGLES

THE SHIFT SPACE FOR AN INFINITE ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEM

ON THE EIGENVALUE PROBLEM FOR A GENERALIZED HEMIVARIATIONAL INEQUALITY

ON NADLER S MULTI-VALUED CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE IN COMPLETE METRIC SPACES

Relevant Classes of Weakly Picard Operators

MULTIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR AN INDEFINITE KIRCHHOFF-TYPE EQUATION WITH SIGN-CHANGING POTENTIAL

Alfred O. Bosede NOOR ITERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ZAMFIRESCU MAPPINGS IN UNIFORMLY CONVEX BANACH SPACES

Theorem (4.11). Let M be a closed subspace of a Hilbert space H. For any x, y E, the parallelogram law applied to x/2 and y/2 gives.

Certain properties of a new subclass of close-to-convex functions

SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction

The centroid of some generalized pedal configurations

UNIQUENESS ALGEBRAIC CONDITIONS IN THE STUDY OF SECOND ORDER DIFFERENTIAL SYSTEMS. Let us consider the following second order differential system:

ON LINEAR RECURRENCES WITH POSITIVE VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS IN BANACH SPACES

Remarks on the Spectrum of Bounded and Normal Operators on Hilbert Spaces

On the Iyengar Madhava Rao Nanjundiah inequality and its hyperbolic version

A SYNOPSIS OF HILBERT SPACE THEORY

CERTAIN CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE ROMANIAN SCHOOL OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPROXIMATION THEORY

A NOTE ON MULTIVALUED MEIR-KEELER TYPE OPERATORS

PROFESSOR PETRU T. MOCANU ON HIS 70 th BIRTHDAY

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS Directorate Public Diplomacy, Cultural and Scientific. Tel: Fax:

3 Orthogonality and Fourier series

Strong Convergence Theorem by a Hybrid Extragradient-like Approximation Method for Variational Inequalities and Fixed Point Problems

8 General Linear Transformations

Almost Convex Functions: Conjugacy and Duality

A remark on the proof of Cobzaş-Mustăţa theorem concerning norm preserving extension of convex Lipschitz functions

ETNA Kent State University

STARLIKE MAPPINGS OF ORDER α ON THE UNIT BALL IN COMPLEX BANACH SPACES

arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 28 Apr 2013

Boundary Behavior of Excess Demand Functions without the Strong Monotonicity Assumption

Continuous family of eigenvalues concentrating in a small neighborhood at the right of the origin for a class of discrete boundary value problems

ABSTRACT CONDITIONAL EXPECTATION IN L 2

Chebyshev Type Inequalities for Sugeno Integrals with Respect to Intuitionistic Fuzzy Measures

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...

CHAPTER II HILBERT SPACES

Discrete Projection Methods for Integral Equations

Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference Lecture 22: Preliminaries for Semiparametric Inference

Another consequence of the Cauchy Schwarz inequality is the continuity of the inner product.

Fall TMA4145 Linear Methods. Exercise set Given the matrix 1 2

A note on the σ-algebra of cylinder sets and all that

Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015)

A GENERALIZATION OF JENSEN EQUATION FOR SET-VALUED MAPS

Kannan mappings vs. Caristi mappings: An easy example

Salah Mecheri. Communicated by S. L. Troyanski

NOTE ON A FIXED POINT THEOREM

Introducing Preorder to Hilbert C -Modules

Convolution properties for subclasses of meromorphic univalent functions of complex order. Teodor Bulboacă, Mohamed K. Aouf, Rabha M.

On non-expansivity of topical functions by a new pseudo-metric

Transcription:

General Mathematics Vol. 16, No. 4 (2008), 25 33 A best approximation property of the generalized spline functions Adrian Branga Abstract In the introduction of this paper is presented the definition of the generalized spline functions as solutions of a variational problem and are shown some theorems regarding to the existence, uniqueness and characterization. The main result of this article consist in a best approximation property satisfied by the generalized spline functions in the context of the spaces, operator and interpolatory set involved. 2000 Mathematical Subject Classification: 41A15, 41A50, 41A52, 65D07 1 Preliminaries Definition 1 Let E 1 be a real linear space, (E 2,. 2 ) anormedreallinear space, T : E 1 E 2 an operator and U E 1 a non-empty set. The problem 25

A best approximation property of the generalized spline functions 26 of finding the elements s U which satisfy (1) T (s) 2 =inf u U T (u) 2, is called the general spline interpolation problem, corresponding to the set U. A solution of this problem, provided that exists, is named general spline interpolation element, corresponding to the set U. The set U is called interpolatory set. InthesequelweassumethatE 1 is a real linear space, (E 2, (.,.) 2,. 2 ) is a real Hilbert space, T : E 1 E 2 is a linear operator and U E 1 is a non-empty convex set. Lemma 1 T (U) E 2 is a non-empty convex set. The proof follows directly from the linearity of the operator T,taking into account that U is a non-empty set. Theorem 1 (Existence Theorem) If T (U) E 2 isaclosedset,thenthe general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U) has at least a solution. The proof is shown in the papers [1, 3]. For every element s U we define the set (2) U(s) :=U s. Lemma 2 For every element s U the set U(s) is non-empty (0 E1 U(s)).

A best approximation property of the generalized spline functions 27 The result follows directly from the relation (2). Theorem 2 (Uniqueness Theorem) If T (U) E 2 is closed set and exists an element s U solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U), such that U(s) is linear subspace of E 1, then the following statements are true i) For any elements s 1,s 2 U solutions of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U) we have (3) s 1 s 2 Ker(T ) U(s); ii) The element s U is the unique solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U) ifandonlyif (4) Ker(T ) U(s) ={0 E1 }. A proof is presented in the papers [1, 2]. Theorem 3 (Characterization Theorem) An element s U is solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U) ifandonly if T (s) is the unique element in T (U) of the best approximation for 0 E2. For a proof see the paper [1]. Lemma 3 For every element s U the set T (U(s)) is non-empty (0 E2 T (U(s))). This result is a consequence of Lemma 2.

A best approximation property of the generalized spline functions 28 Lemma 4 If an element s U has the property that U(s) is linear subspace of E 1,thenT (U(s)) is linear subspace of E 2. The property follows directly from the linearity of the operator T. Theorem 4 (Characterization Theorem) An element s U, such that U(s) is linear subspace of E 1, is solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U) ifandonlyif (5) (T (s),t(ũ)) 2 =0, ( ) ũ U(s). A proof is shown in the papers [1, 3]. For every element s U we consider the set (6) S(s) :={v E 1 (T (v),t(ũ)) 2 =0, ( ) ũ U(s)}. Proposition 1 For every element s U the set S(s) has the following properties i) S(s) is non-empty set (0 E1 S(s)); ii) S(s) is linear subspace of E 1 ; iii) Ker(T ) S(s); iv) U(s) S(s) Ker(T ); v) Ker(T ) U(s) S(s); vi) U(s) S(s) =Ker(T ) U(s). For a proof see the paper [1].

A best approximation property of the generalized spline functions 29 Theorem 5 (Characterization Theorem) An element s U, such that U(s) is linear subspace of E 1, is solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U) ifandonlyif (7) s S(s). The result is a consequence of Theorem 4. 2 Main result Lemma 5 For every element s U the set (T (U(s))) has the following properties i) (T (U(s))) is non-empty set (0 E2 (T (U(s))) ); ii) (T (U(s))) is linear subspace of E 2 ; iii) (T (U(s))) is closed set; iv) (T (U(s))) (T (U(s))) = {0 E2 }. This result follows directly from the property of the orthogonality, taking into account Lemma 3. Lemma 6 An element s U, such that U(s) is linear subspace of E 1,is solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U) if and only if (8) T (s) (T (U(s))).

A best approximation property of the generalized spline functions 30 Proof. From Theorem 4 it follows that an element s U, such that U(s) is linear subspace of E 1, is solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U) if and only if (9) (T (s),t(ũ)) 2 =0, ( ) ũ U(s). On the other hand we have (10) {(T (s),t(ũ)) 2 ũ U(s)} = {(T (s), t ) 2 t T (U(s))}. Taking into account the equality (10), we deduce that the formula (9) is equivalent with (11) (T (s), t ) 2 =0, ( ) t T (U(s)), i.e. (12) T (s) (T (U(s))). Consequently, an element s U, such that U(s) is linear subspace of E 1, is solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U) if and only if (13) T (s) (T (U(s))). Lemma 7 For every element s U the following equality holds (14) T (U) T (s) =T (U(s)). The proof is based on the linearity of the operator T.

A best approximation property of the generalized spline functions 31 Theorem 6 If an element s U, such that U(s) is linear subspace of E 1, is solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U), then the following inequality is true (15) T (u) T (s) 2 T (u) w 2, ( ) u U, ( ) w (T (U(s))), with equality if and only if w = T (s). Proof. Let u U, w (T (U(s))) be arbitrary elements. Using the properties of the inner product (.,.) 2, we deduce (16) T (u) w 2 2 = (T (u) T (s)) + (T (s) w) 2 2 = = T (u) T (s) 2 2 +2(T (u) T (s),t(s) w) 2 + T (s) w 2 2. As u U it obtains (17) T (u) T (U), therefore (18) T (u) T (s) T (U) T (s). Taking into account that s U, from Lemma 7 it follows that (19) T (U) T (s) =T (U(s)). Using the formula (19), the relation (18) becomes (20) T (u) T (s) T (U(s)). Because s U, from Lemma 5 ii) it obtains that (T (U(s))) is linear subspace of E 2. On the other hand, as s U, such that U(s) is linear

A best approximation property of the generalized spline functions 32 subspace of E 1, is solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U), using Lemma 6 we deduce T (s) (T (U(s))).Also, we have w (T (U(s))). Consequently, it follows that (21) T (s) w (T (U(s))). From relations (20), (21) we deduce (22) (T (u) T (s),t(s) w) 2 =0. Substituting the formula (22) in the equality (16), it follows that (23) T (u) w 2 2 = T (u) T (s) 2 2 + T (s) w 2 2. The relation (23) implies (24) T (u) T (s) 2 T (u) w 2, with equality if and only if T (s) w 2 = 0, i.e. w = T (s). Theorem 7 If an element s U, such that U(s) is linear subspace of E 1, is solution of the general spline interpolation problem (1) (corresponding to U), then (25) T (u) T (s) 2 = inf ew (T (U(s))) T (u) w 2, ( ) u U, i.e. T (s) istheuniqueelementin(t (U(s))) of the best approximation for T (u), ( ) u U. This result follows directly from Theorem 6.

A best approximation property of the generalized spline functions 33 References [1] A. Branga, Contribuţii la Teoria Funcţiilor spline, Teză de Doctorat, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, 2002. [2] Gh. Micula, Funcţii spline şi aplicaţii, Editura Tehnică, Bucureşti, 1978. [3] Gh. Micula, S. Micula, Handbook of splines, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht-Boston-London, 1999. Adrian Branga University Lucian Blaga of Sibiu Department of Mathematics Dr. I. Raţiu 5-7, Sibiu 550012, Romania e-mail: adrian branga@yahoo.com