Supplement information

Similar documents
Supplementary Figure 3 a. Structural comparison between the two determined structures for the IL 23:MA12 complex. The overall RMSD between the two

Amino Acid Side Chain Induced Selectivity in the Hydrolysis of Peptides Catalyzed by a Zr(IV)-Substituted Wells-Dawson Type Polyoxometalate

Supplementary figure 1. Comparison of unbound ogm-csf and ogm-csf as captured in the GIF:GM-CSF complex. Alignment of two copies of unbound ovine

Packing of Secondary Structures

Amino Acids and Proteins at ZnO-water Interfaces in Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Electronic Supplementary Information

Proteins: Characteristics and Properties of Amino Acids

Supplementary Information. Broad Spectrum Anti-Influenza Agents by Inhibiting Self- Association of Matrix Protein 1

Structure and evolution of the spliceosomal peptidyl-prolyl cistrans isomerase Cwc27

Enhancing Specificity in the Janus Kinases: A Study on the Thienopyridine. JAK2 Selective Mechanism Combined Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Supporting information to: Time-resolved observation of protein allosteric communication. Sebastian Buchenberg, Florian Sittel and Gerhard Stock 1

What makes a good graphene-binding peptide? Adsorption of amino acids and peptides at aqueous graphene interfaces: Electronic Supplementary

Other Methods for Generating Ions 1. MALDI matrix assisted laser desorption ionization MS 2. Spray ionization techniques 3. Fast atom bombardment 4.

7.012 Problem Set 1. i) What are two main differences between prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells?

Oxygen Binding in Hemocyanin

Using Higher Calculus to Study Biologically Important Molecules Julie C. Mitchell

NMR study of complexes between low molecular mass inhibitors and the West Nile virus NS2B-NS3 protease

Ranjit P. Bahadur Assistant Professor Department of Biotechnology Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India. 1 st November, 2013

Exam I Answer Key: Summer 2006, Semester C

Unraveling the degradation of artificial amide bonds in Nylon oligomer hydrolase: From induced-fit to acylation processes

What binds to Hb in addition to O 2?

Electronic Supplementary Information

C H E M I S T R Y N A T I O N A L Q U A L I F Y I N G E X A M I N A T I O N SOLUTIONS GUIDE

CHMI 2227 EL. Biochemistry I. Test January Prof : Eric R. Gauthier, Ph.D.

Exam III. Please read through each question carefully, and make sure you provide all of the requested information.

Ramachandran Plot. 4ysz Phi (degrees) Plot statistics

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapy-JPET#172536

Section Week 3. Junaid Malek, M.D.

Supporting information

Viewing and Analyzing Proteins, Ligands and their Complexes 2

FW 1 CDR 1 FW 2 CDR 2

Solutions In each case, the chirality center has the R configuration

Supplementary Information Intrinsic Localized Modes in Proteins

Chapter 4: Amino Acids

Supporting Information. A Comprehensive Computational Study of the Interaction between Human Serum Albumin and Fullerenes

Protein Fragment Search Program ver Overview: Contents:

Peptide Syntheses. Illustrative Protection: BOC/ t Bu. A. Introduction. do not acid

Force Fields for Classical Molecular Dynamics simulations of Biomolecules. Emad Tajkhorshid

Sensitive NMR Approach for Determining the Binding Mode of Tightly Binding Ligand Molecules to Protein Targets

Multi-scale approaches in description and design of enzymes

Bacterial protease uses distinct thermodynamic signatures for substrate recognition

7.012 Problem Set 1 Solutions

Protein Structure Bioinformatics Introduction

Supplementary information

Programme Last week s quiz results + Summary Fold recognition Break Exercise: Modelling remote homologues

Physiochemical Properties of Residues

Supporting Information

Secondary Structure. Bioch/BIMS 503 Lecture 2. Structure and Function of Proteins. Further Reading. Φ, Ψ angles alone determine protein structure

C CH 3 N C COOH. Write the structural formulas of all of the dipeptides that they could form with each other.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

April, The energy functions include:

Protein Data Bank Contents Guide: Atomic Coordinate Entry Format Description. Version Document Published by the wwpdb

Chemistry Chapter 22

Desorption/Ionization Efficiency of Common Amino Acids in. Surface-assisted Laser Desorption/ionization Mass Spectrometry

A. Two of the common amino acids are analyzed. Amino acid X and amino acid Y both have an isoionic point in the range of

Any protein that can be labelled by both procedures must be a transmembrane protein.

Introduction to the Ribosome Overview of protein synthesis on the ribosome Prof. Anders Liljas

Sequential resonance assignments in (small) proteins: homonuclear method 2º structure determination

Supplementary Information

Clustering and Model Integration under the Wasserstein Metric. Jia Li Department of Statistics Penn State University

*Corresponding Author *K. F.: *T. H.:

Amino acids: Optimization in underivatized formula and fragment patterns in LC/ESI-MS analysis. Yoshinori Takano (JAMSTEC)

MARK SCHEME for the October/November 2012 series 9701 CHEMISTRY

Rotamers in the CHARMM19 Force Field

Cationic carbosilane dendrimers and oligonucleotide binding: an energetic affair

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

CHEM J-9 June 2014

Structure Investigation of Fam20C, a Golgi Casein Kinase

Molecular Dynamics, Monte Carlo and Docking. Lecture 21. Introduction to Bioinformatics MNW2

Electronic Supplementary Information for

Computer simulations of protein folding with a small number of distance restraints

Geometrical Concept-reduction in conformational space.and his Φ-ψ Map. G. N. Ramachandran

Supporting Information

Free energy, electrostatics, and the hydrophobic effect

Major Types of Association of Proteins with Cell Membranes. From Alberts et al

Peptides And Proteins

B O C 4 H 2 O O. NOTE: The reaction proceeds with a carbonium ion stabilized on the C 1 of sugar A.

NH 2. Biochemistry I, Fall Term Sept 9, Lecture 5: Amino Acids & Peptides Assigned reading in Campbell: Chapter

Diastereomeric resolution directed towards chirality. determination focussing on gas-phase energetics of coordinated. sodium dissociation

Bio 111 Exam #2. Version A 11/13/06. Question Value Score 1 23 TOTAL: 100. Your Name: Solutions can be found in the Biochemistry 5 handout.

Central Dogma. modifications genome transcriptome proteome

Supporting Information

Structural Bioinformatics (C3210) Molecular Mechanics

Structural and mechanistic insight into the substrate. binding from the conformational dynamics in apo. and substrate-bound DapE enzyme

Figure 1. Molecules geometries of 5021 and Each neutral group in CHARMM topology was grouped in dash circle.

Amino Acids and Peptides

A Plausible Model Correlates Prebiotic Peptide Synthesis with. Primordial Genetic Code

Protein structure. Protein structure. Amino acid residue. Cell communication channel. Bioinformatics Methods

Supporting Online Material for

12/6/12. Dr. Sanjeeva Srivastava IIT Bombay. Primary Structure. Secondary Structure. Tertiary Structure. Quaternary Structure.

Properties of amino acids in proteins

Full wwpdb X-ray Structure Validation Report i

Volume 12(2)

Electronic Supplementary Information

Deciphering the Rules for Amino Acid Co- Assembly Based on Interlayer Distances

Aggregation of the Amyloid-β Protein: Monte Carlo Optimization Study

Course Notes: Topics in Computational. Structural Biology.

Table 1. Crystallographic data collection, phasing and refinement statistics. Native Hg soaked Mn soaked 1 Mn soaked 2

Computational Protein Design

Molecular Dynamics, Monte Carlo and Docking. Lecture 21. Introduction to Bioinformatics MNW2

Nitrogenase MoFe protein from Clostridium pasteurianum at 1.08 Å resolution: comparison with the Azotobacter vinelandii MoFe protein

Transcription:

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Physil Chemistry Chemil Physics. This journal is the Owner Societies 216 Supplement information Fullerenol C 6 (OH) 16 prevents amyloid fibrillization of Aβ 4 : in vitro and in silico approach a,b Zuzana Bednarikova, c Pham Dinh Quoc Huy, d Maria-Magdalena Monu, a Diana Fedunova, c Mai Suan Li*, a,e Gazova Zuzana* a Department of Biophysics, Institute of Experimental Physics, Slovak Ademy of Sciences, Watsonova 47, 4 1 Kosice, Slovakia b Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Safarik University, Srobarova 2, 41 54 Kosice, Slovakia c Institute of Physics, Polish Ademy of Sciences, Al. Lotnikow 32/46, 2-668 Warsaw, Poland d Department of Biophysics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 5474 Bucharest, Romania e Department of Medil and Clinil Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Safarik University, Trieda SNP 1, 4 11 Kosice, Slovakia These autrs contributed equally Table S1: Energy obtained by gaussian 9 (Hartree Fock metd) for 7 isomers. The difference from the lowest energy of isomer L1 is also swn. Isomers Energy (kl/mol) Energy (Hatree) Energy difference E- E(L1) (kl/mol) L1-218312.64-3478.89 L2-2182988.16-3478.85 24.48 L3-2182928.96-3478.75 83.68 L4-2182928.53-3478.75 84.11 L5-2182917.39-3478.74 95.25 L6-2182911.82-3478.73 1.82 L7-2182896.6-3478.7 116.4 1

Table S2: Parameters of isomer L1 which have been used for MD simulations. Here, ε is the depth of the Lennard-Jones potential well and R is the van der Waals radius. Atom name Atom type Charge R(Angstrom) e(kl/mol) C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C1 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16 C17 C18 C19 C2 C21 C22 C23 O1 C24 O2 C25 O3 C26 C27 C28 C29 C3 C31 C32 C33 O4 C34 O5 C35 O6 C36 O7 C37 C38 C39 C4 C41 C42 C43 C44 C45 C46 O8 -.98838 -.3846.1158.241845 -.125665 -.148336.15585.15281 -.31649 -.786.397228 -.21241 -.39249.234673.231847.275651 -.143573 -.266987.174 -.154213.443897.27613 -.9932 -.737394.382274 -.69322.6976 -.599121 -.189523.14549 -.286384 -.82145 -.232211 -.28825.45731.219942 -.593563.63461 -.527354 -.345842 -.64777 -.212117 -.54657.299873 -.6414 -.12477.48255.1516 -.371 -.14143 -.15296.225667.433485 -.552526 2

3 C47 O9 C48 O1 C49 O11 C5 C51 C52 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 H1 H11 C53 C54 C55 C56 C57 C58 C59 C6 O12 O13 O14 O15 O16 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 -.23544 -.598552.345881 -.474333.755559 -.59131.229346.574169.266961.388878.351547.47926.354853.39282.35254.42668.367224.3983.418967.483522.26112 -.139177 -.141328.353539 -.99611 -.315448 -.129596.3351 -.687294 -.559361 -.527926 -.529634 -.655368.368695.37967.4421.39194.374174

Table S3: Parameters of isomer L7 which have been used for MD simulations. Here, ε is the depth of the Lennard-Jones potential well and R is the van der Waals radius. Atom name Atom type Charge R (Å) ε (kl/mol) C1.2692 C2 ce -.812 C3 c2 -.1244 C4.2363 C5.2372 C6 ce.38 C7 -.138 C8 ce -.132 C9 -.793 C1 -.863 C11 -.1163 C12 c2 -.1884 C13 ce -.542 C14 cf -.262 C15 cf -.852 C16.2652 C17 c2 -.1684 C18 cf -.122 C19.2353 C2.122 C21 -.18 C22 ce -.184 C23 ce -.734 C24.2353 C25.2774 C26 cf.588 C27 -.18 C28.2773 C29.2272 C3 cf.12 C31 cf -.832 C32 -.823 C33 -.1 C34 -.253 C35.1 C36 cf -.693 C37.1 C38.2282 C39.2712 C4.2364 4

C41 cf -.64 C42 -.8 C43 -.433 C44 -.9 C45 -.993 C46 ce -.723 C47.284 C48 cf -.3 C49 c2 -.114 C5.2412 C51 ce -.474 C52 cf -.952 C53 -.943 C54 -.188 C55 -.833 C56 -.843 C57.2713 C58.2833 C59.2 C6.25 O1 -.5638 H11.439 O2 -.5668 H1.423 O3 -.5778 H6.45 O7 -.548 H4.435 O5 -.578 H1.42 O4 -.5638 H7.442 O6 -.5658 H5.433 O8 -.5388 H2.431 O9 -.5638 H8.433 O11 -.5378 H9.435 O13 -.5758 H16.444 O1 -.5578 H3.432 5

O14 -.5618 H15.441 O16 -.528 H13.415 O15 -.5298 H14.43 O12 -.5588 H12.434 Table S4. Binding energy ΔE bind (kl/mol) obtained by the docking metd for 7 isomers in five Aβ 4 models. Error bars come from averaging over five models. L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 M1-5.9-5.5-6.5-6.3-6.6-5.9-5.9 M2-6.7-6.6-6.1-6.1-6.7-6.4-6.3 M3-7.4-7.5-6.4-6.6-6.9-7.3-6.2 M4-7.8-7.3-6.5-6.4-6.7-7.2-7. M5-6.6-5.8-6.1-5.7-6. -6.3-5.3 Average -6.9 ±.7-6.5 ±.9-6.3 ±.2-6.2 ±.3-6.6 ±.3-6.6 ±.6 6.1 ±.6 Table S5. Binding energy ΔE bind (kl/mol) obtained by the docking metd for the most unstable isomer L7. N hb and N sc refer to the number of hydrogen bonds and side-chain contacts, respectively. See Figure S3 and Figure S4 for more information about HBs and SC contact networks. Model bind N hb N sc Amino acids in side-chain contact with ligand 1-5.9 3 11 Asp1, Glu3, Arg5, Val18, Ala21, Asp23, Ser26, Lys28, Ile32, Gly33, Leu34 2-6.3 4 1 His6, Asp7, Ser8, Gly9, His13, His14, Lys16, Asp23, Val24, Gly25 3-6.2 6 Val12, Gln15, Lys16, Leu17, Phe19, Glu22 4-7. 3 9 Phe4, Ser8, Tyr1, His13, Val36, Gly37, Gly38, Val39, Val4 5-5.3 4 9 Ala2, Gly9, Tyr1, Ile31, Val36, Gly37, Gly38, Val39, Val4 6

Table S6. Binding free energy (kl/mol) of isomer L7 to Aβ 4 obtained by the MM-PBSA metd. The van der Waals (ΔE vdw ) and electrostatic interactions for OH groups and rbon atoms (ΔE elec ) are in red and blue, respectively. Model Traj ΔE vdw ΔE elec ΔE PB ΔE sur -TΔS ΔG bind ΔG bind 1-49.5-85.5 1 1.9-2.9 19.4-17.3-6.8-42.7 73.9-159.3-21.3-55.5-13.6 2 121.1-3.6 16. -25.4-6.6-48.9 66.2-169.8 2 1-51.6-92.6 111.8-2.9 2.4-14.7-6.3-45.3 128.7-221.2-23.7 2-71.6-17.6 134.4-4.1 15.9-32.8-8.5-63.1 83.1-19.7 3 1-62. -128.8 144.8-4.1 18.3-31.6-6.6-55.4 84.6-213.4-33. 2-75.8-11.9 142.2-4.6 14.3-34.5-12.1-63.6 19.1-129.9 4 1-46. -115.7 136.3-3.3 19.6-8.9-1.2-44.8 94.5-21.2-7.7 2-33.6-98.9 11.2-2.3 17.8-6.6.4-34. 126.5-225.3 5 1-49.6-81. 13.4-3.1 19.4-1.6-1.3-8.8-4.8 136.2-217.2 2-4.3-6.8 78.9-2.7 17.3-9.9-8. -34.9 11.2-171. Average -53.8-98.5 118.4-3.4 17.8-19.2 Table S7. List of residues loting near isomer L7 of C 6 (OH) 16. Results were obtained by the MD simulations. The adjacent amino acids are defined as tse forming contact with fullerenol more than 5% of time in equilibrium (Figure 6). Model Residues 1 Glu3, Arg5, His14, Ala21, Glu22, Asp23, Val24, Gly25, Ser26, Asn27, Lys28, Gly29, Ile32, Gly33, Leu34 2 Phe4, His6, Asp7, Ser8, Gly9, Tyr1, His14, Val24, Gly25, Ser26, Asn27, Lys28, Ala3, Gly33, Gly37, Gly38 3 Ala2, Glu11, Val12, His13, His14, Gln15, Lys16, Glu22, Asp23, Val24, Gly25, Ser26, Asn27, Lys28, Ile31, Met35, Gly37, Gly38, Val39 4 Ala2, Glu3, Phe4, Arg5, Asp7, Tyr1, Ser26, Asn27, Lys28, Leu34, Val36, Gly37, Gly38, Val39, Val4 5 Ala2, Arg5, Gly9, Tyr1, Glu11, Val12, Phe19, Phe2, Met35, Val36, Gly37, Gly38, Val39, Val4 7

98 96 Transmittance (%) 94 92 9 88 86 4 3 2 Wavenumbers (cm -1 ) 1 Figure S1. FTIR spectrum of fullerenol C 6 (OH) 16 prepared according procedure published by Wang et al.. 3 The spectrum corresponds to spectrum of the fullerene C 6 which rries 16 ± 2 OH groups as determined by Wang et al.. 3 Concentration of C 6 (OH) 16 fullerenol was 15 mg/ml. 8

Figure S2: Docking poses of isomer L1 in the five models. Yellow dashed lines represent hydrogen bonds between L1 and Aβ4. 9

Figure S3. Hydrogen bond network formed by the most unstable isomer L7 with Aβ4 in five structure models. Yellow dashed line represents the hydrogen bond. The names of residues forming hydrogen bonds with fullerenol are explicitly swn. Results were obtained by the docking metd. Figure S4. Side-chain contacts between Aβ4 and isomer L7 in the best docking poses of 5 structure models (red dashed lines). The names of residues forming SC with fullerenol are explicitly swn. 1

Figure S5. The time evolution of the RMSD and interaction energy for Aβ4-L1 complexes. The arrow refers to the time when the system reaches equilibrium. Snapsts collected after arrow was used for MM/PBSA lculation. 11

Figure S6. The time evolution of the RMSD and interaction energy for Aβ4-L7 complexes. The arrow refers to the time when the system reaches equilibrium. Snapsts collected after arrow was used for MM/PBSA lculation. 12

Figure S7. Representative snapsts where isomer L1 forms SC contacts with the salt bridge as well as with the C-terminus. Figure S8. Probability that amino acid (AA) stays in contact with isomer L7 of fullerenol C6(OH)16 in equilibrium. AAs with green stars have contact with ligand by docking metd. Red line refers to probability of 5% above which the binding is strong. 13

Figure S9. Per-residue distributions for vdw and Coulomb interactions with isomer L7 of fullerenol C6(OH)16. Results were obtained by MD simulations. The interaction energy is in kl/mol. 14