Observability of flow dependent structure functions and their use in data assimilation

Similar documents
Observability of flow dependent structure functions and their use in data assimilation

Data Assimilation. Alan O Neill Data Assimilation Research Centre University of Reading

7/12/2010. Andrew Lorenc (Met Office, UK) Peter Steinle (BMRC, Australia) Mickael Tsyrulnikov (HRCR, Russia)

Satellite Retrieval Data Assimilation

LAMEPS Limited area ensemble forecasting in Norway, using targeted EPS

How do we solve these things, especially when they get complicated? How do we know when a system has a solution, and when is it unique?

5.1 How do we Measure Distance Traveled given Velocity? Student Notes

Title of file for HTML: Supplementary Information Description: Supplementary Figures. Title of file for HTML: Peer Review File Description:

Math 8 Winter 2015 Applications of Integration

1B40 Practical Skills

Interpreting Integrals and the Fundamental Theorem

How do we solve these things, especially when they get complicated? How do we know when a system has a solution, and when is it unique?

A REVIEW OF CALCULUS CONCEPTS FOR JDEP 384H. Thomas Shores Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska Spring 2007

1 Nondeterministic Finite Automata

CS 373, Spring Solutions to Mock midterm 1 (Based on first midterm in CS 273, Fall 2008.)

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2013 Anant Sahai Lecture 17

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Summer 2014 James Cook Note 17

Predict Global Earth Temperature using Linier Regression

Probabilistic Investigation of Sensitivities of Advanced Test- Analysis Model Correlation Methods

Hints for Exercise 1 on: Current and Resistance

SUMMER KNOWHOW STUDY AND LEARNING CENTRE

LECTURE 14. Dr. Teresa D. Golden University of North Texas Department of Chemistry

5: The Definite Integral

Fully Kinetic Simulations of Ion Beam Neutralization

I1 = I2 I1 = I2 + I3 I1 + I2 = I3 + I4 I 3

New Expansion and Infinite Series

Bases for Vector Spaces

A027 Uncertainties in Local Anisotropy Estimation from Multi-offset VSP Data

7.2 The Definite Integral

Homework Assignment 6 Solution Set

Lecture 3. In this lecture, we will discuss algorithms for solving systems of linear equations.

7.1 Integral as Net Change and 7.2 Areas in the Plane Calculus

The Minimum Label Spanning Tree Problem: Illustrating the Utility of Genetic Algorithms

Model Reduction of Finite State Machines by Contraction

CS415 Compilers. Lexical Analysis and. These slides are based on slides copyrighted by Keith Cooper, Ken Kennedy & Linda Torczon at Rice University

A Posteriori Diagnostics of the Impact of Observations on the AROME- France Convective-Scale Data-Assimilation System.

Chapter 4: Techniques of Circuit Analysis. Chapter 4: Techniques of Circuit Analysis

Goals: Determine how to calculate the area described by a function. Define the definite integral. Explore the relationship between the definite

Section 4: Integration ECO4112F 2011

Section 6: Area, Volume, and Average Value

Incorporating Ensemble Covariance in the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation Variational Minimization: A Mathematical Framework

Improper Integrals. Type I Improper Integrals How do we evaluate an integral such as

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

P 3 (x) = f(0) + f (0)x + f (0) 2. x 2 + f (0) . In the problem set, you are asked to show, in general, the n th order term is a n = f (n) (0)

Properties of Integrals, Indefinite Integrals. Goals: Definition of the Definite Integral Integral Calculations using Antiderivatives

Designing finite automata II

f(x) dx, If one of these two conditions is not met, we call the integral improper. Our usual definition for the value for the definite integral

Monte Carlo method in solving numerical integration and differential equation

Vorticity. curvature: shear: fluid elements moving in a straight line but at different speeds. t 1 t 2. ATM60, Shu-Hua Chen

Bypassing no-go theorems for consistent interactions in gauge theories

1 Online Learning and Regret Minimization

SOLUTION OF QUADRATIC NONLINEAR PROBLEMS WITH MULTIPLE SCALES LINDSTEDT-POINCARE METHOD. Mehmet Pakdemirli and Gözde Sarı

2. VECTORS AND MATRICES IN 3 DIMENSIONS

Partial Derivatives. Limits. For a single variable function f (x), the limit lim

Operations with Polynomials

SOLUTIONS FOR ADMISSIONS TEST IN MATHEMATICS, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND JOINT SCHOOLS WEDNESDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2014

p-adic Egyptian Fractions

Bayesian Networks: Approximate Inference

( dg. ) 2 dt. + dt. dt j + dh. + dt. r(t) dt. Comparing this equation with the one listed above for the length of see that

Review of Gaussian Quadrature method

Review of Calculus, cont d

CBE 291b - Computation And Optimization For Engineers

Section 6.1 INTRO to LAPLACE TRANSFORMS

An approximation to the arithmetic-geometric mean. G.J.O. Jameson, Math. Gazette 98 (2014), 85 95

1.2. Linear Variable Coefficient Equations. y + b "! = a y + b " Remark: The case b = 0 and a non-constant can be solved with the same idea as above.

Student Activity 3: Single Factor ANOVA

Tests for the Ratio of Two Poisson Rates

QUADRATURE is an old-fashioned word that refers to

Jack Simons, Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah

Module 6: LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS

Math 520 Final Exam Topic Outline Sections 1 3 (Xiao/Dumas/Liaw) Spring 2008

AMATH 731: Applied Functional Analysis Fall Some basics of integral equations

Riemann is the Mann! (But Lebesgue may besgue to differ.)

Farey Fractions. Rickard Fernström. U.U.D.M. Project Report 2017:24. Department of Mathematics Uppsala University

The Regulated and Riemann Integrals

Entanglement Purification

A Signal-Level Fusion Model for Image-Based Change Detection in DARPA's Dynamic Database System

MATH 144: Business Calculus Final Review

Thomas Whitham Sixth Form

Math 100 Review Sheet

ADVANCEMENT OF THE CLOSELY COUPLED PROBES POTENTIAL DROP TECHNIQUE FOR NDE OF SURFACE CRACKS

Emission of K -, L - and M - Auger Electrons from Cu Atoms. Abstract

CS 330 Formal Methods and Models Dana Richards, George Mason University, Spring 2016 Quiz Solutions

Lecture 19: Continuous Least Squares Approximation

MIXED MODELS (Sections ) I) In the unrestricted model, interactions are treated as in the random effects model:

We partition C into n small arcs by forming a partition of [a, b] by picking s i as follows: a = s 0 < s 1 < < s n = b.

5.7 Improper Integrals

Lecture 09: Myhill-Nerode Theorem

Linear Systems with Constant Coefficients

Homework Solution - Set 5 Due: Friday 10/03/08

Chapter 3. Vector Spaces

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

2 b. , a. area is S= 2π xds. Again, understand where these formulas came from (pages ).

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2013 Assignment 2

The Wave Equation I. MA 436 Kurt Bryan

Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 55 (130) (2005), , Abbotsford. 1. Introduction

CHAPTER 20: Second Law of Thermodynamics

INTRODUCTION. The three general approaches to the solution of kinetics problems are:

Robust Predictions in Games with Incomplete Information

MATH34032: Green s Functions, Integral Equations and the Calculus of Variations 1

Transcription:

Oservility of flow dependent structure functions nd their use in dt ssimiltion Pierre Guthier Bsed on work done in collortion with Cristin Lupu (MSc 2006, PhD thesis 2010, UQAM) nd Stéphne Lroche (Env. Cnd) Presenttion t the 2010 ESA Erth Oservtion Summer School on Erth system monitoring nd modeling Frscti, Itly, 2-13 August 2010 Deprtment of Erth nd Atmospheric Sciences Université du Quéec à Montrél

Outline Mesuring the impct of oservtions in dt ssimiltion systems * Impct on the nlysis (informtion content) * Impct on short-term forecsts sed on djoint methods Impct of flow-dependent structures in dt ssimiltion nd link with precursors to dynmic instility * Evlution of the oservility of structure functions (Lupu, 2010) Implictions for hyrid 4D-Vr * he erlier experiments of Fisher nd Andersson with reduced rnk Klmn filter * he hyrid 4D-Vr/EnKF (Buehner et l., 2009) Conclusions

Sttisticl nture of the ssimiltion * o correct short-term forecst (x, the ckground stte) with error covrince B sed on informtion contined in oservtion y with oservtion error covrince R * he resulting nlysis x hs n ccurcy mesured y its error covrince P which is less thn tht of the ckground x P x K y Hx B KHB * he weight is given y the gin mtrix K set to minimize the totl nlysis error vrince K BH * Oservtion opertor H hs een linerized round the current ckground stte R HBH 1

Approches to mesuring the impct of ssimilted oservtions Informtion content * sed on the reltive ccurcy of oservtions nd the ckground stte Oserving System Experiments * Dt denils * Glol view of the impct of oservtions on the qulity of the forecsts Oservtion impct on the qulity of the forecsts * Sensitivities with respect to oservtions sed on djoint methods (Bker nd Dley, 2000; Lnglnd nd Bker, 2003) * Ensemle Klmn filter methods

Informtion content Rtio of the nlysis error covrince to B 1 P B tri trkh N trkh tr he informtion gined from ssimilting given set of oservtions is represented y the second term, where N is the dimension of the model spce DFS = Degrees of Freedom per signl nd in oservtion spce P tr HP H B HBH 1 HP H HBH M trhk with M eing the numer of oservtions

Dignosing the sttisticl informtion from the results of nlysis Desroziers (2005) * use the results of the ssimiltion to estimte the oservtion, ckground nd nlysis error covrinces in oservtion spce d y Hx y Hx d H x x HKd * nd then, dd d ~ R HBH D D ~ R R D 1~ D d d d ~ HBH HP HBH ~ H HBH D D 1 ~ D ~ DD 1 1 R

Estimting the informtion content (or Degrees of Freedom per signl) 1 Noticing tht R R D D HBH HBH D D If the priori nd posteriori error sttistics re consistent, ~ then nd therefore, D D ~ 1~ ~ ~ R R HBH HBH Estimtion of the DFS DFS tr 1 HK tr HBH R HBH tr HBH D 1 tr tr tr DFS 1 1 1 HK HBH D HBH D DD his gives the sme informtion content s otined from the priori error sttistics

Estimting the informtion content Estimte of the informtion content is sed solely on dignostics from the ssimiltion process d DFS tr y Hx d d dd y Hx x HKd d H x 1 1 1 tr dd dd d dd Need to estimte nd invert dd which is full mtrix ecuse it contins the ckground error Alternte form ~ DFS tr R ~ HP H d d tr d Additionl ssumption: R ~ is digonl 1 1 ~ R 1 1 d d d

Roustness of the estimte: experiments with simple 1D-Vr 1Dvr ssimiltion of 60 oservtions with covrince model with homogeneous nd isotropic correltions Sttisticl verge over 2000 nlyses L(km) 2 2 σ o σo( t) 2 σ σ~ ) ( ~ 2 ) 2 σ ( t) ( 2 o 300 4. 1. 4.04 0.98 500 4. 1. 4.02 0.96 1000 4. 1. 3.98 0.94 σ,

Roustness of the results with the size of the smple Oservtion error Bckground error

Estimting the oservtion error covrince R ~ Estimte of the off-digonl terms of s function of distnce r i,j ~ R i, j i d j L = 300 km L = 500 km L = 1000 km x

Estimtion of the informtion content ~ ( 1) ~ ~ 1 DFS APOS tr HBH D 2) ~ DFS APOS tr R ~ ( 1 L (km) ~ HP H DFSHEOR D FS ~ : only the digonl terms of the second DIAG method re used DFS ~ (1) GIRARD DFS APOS ~ D (2) FS APOS D FS ~ DIAG 300 11.03 10.88 10.81 10.80 10.70 500 9.50 9.37 9.21 9.20 9.07 1000 7.34 7.08 6.79 6.79 6.75 Esiest to compute DFS GIRARD DFS HEOR : estimtion otined from pertured nlysis : estimtion otined from the true vlues

Informtion content in 3D-Vr nd 4D-Vr nlyses from Environment Cnd s system Results from the ssimiltion experiments of Lroche nd Srrzin (2010,) over the period Decemer 21, 2006 to Ferury 28, 2007 * Exclude the first 11 dys (spin-up of the ssimiltion cycle) Oservtions include * Rdiosondes, ircrft, surfce nd ship dt, wind profilers * Atmospheric motion vectors from geosttionry stellites * Rdinces from polr-oriting stellites (AMSU-,) nd geosttionry stellites (GOES-Est nd West) Dignostic of sttisticl consistency: 2 /M ~ 1 * Both in 3D-Vr nd 4D-Vr it ws found tht 2 /M = 0.56 * Error sttistics used in the system re overestimted * Desroziers nd Ivnov (2001) nd Chpnik et l. (2004) use this informtion to reclirte the sttistics * his ws not the oject of this work

otl DFS estimted over different regions for 3D-Vr nd 4D-Vr (Jnury-Ferury 2007)

Computtion of DFS for ech type of oservtions in MSC s 3D-Vr nd 4D-Vr systems DFS Region Os _ type (%) DFS 100 DFS Region Os _ type Gloe otl _ os Region : Gloe Os_types : AI, GO, PR, SF, SW, AMSU-A, AMSU-B, RAOB Lupu et l. (2010)

Oservtion impct per oservtion in ech region IC(%) DFS 100 p Region k k Lupu et l. (2010)

Oserving System Experiments (OSEs) Experiments reported in Lroche nd Srrzin (2010-,) Evlution of the impct of oservtions through dt denils * ke n nlysis using ll oservtions s reference nd then remove one oservtion type nd mesure the degrdtion * Modifiction of the oservtion environment lters the reltive importnce of the oservtions Comprison of the informtion content for these experiments gives detiled view of the interctions etween oservtions

OSEs experiments: 3D-Vr nd 4D-Vr, North Americ DFS p k NA k DFS vlues per ostype normlized y the numer of oservtions. NO_RAOB: DFS per single oservtion notly increses, especilly for AMSU-A nd GO; NO_AIRCRAF: DFS per single oservtion notly increses, especilly for RAOB nd PR; For other oservtions (GO, SW nd AMSU-B) DFS per os lso increses slightly.

Summry Informtion content cn e evluted y dignosing the results of n ssimiltion Provides detiled view of the impct of the oservtions within the originl oservtion environment Appliction to the results from OSEs show how the impct of oservtions on nlyses depend on the oservtion environment OSEs on the other hnd mesure the impct of oservtions on the susequent forecsts

Oservtion Impct Methodology (Lnglnd nd Bker, 2004) e e 24 30 OBSERVAIONS ASSIMILAED e 30 e 24 00UC + 24h Oservtions move the model stte from the ckground trjectory to the new nlysis trjectory he difference in forecst error norms, 24 30, is due to the comined impct of ll oservtions ssimilted t 00UC e e

Oservility of flow dependent structure functions Forecst Verifying nlysis Anlysis error (e 24 ) Anlysis X x Forecst error (e 30 ) Bckground X 0-h 24-h 26/01 12 UC 28/01 12 UC e e 30 e 24 x L J x L J x J J K y Hx L L x x

Evlution of the impct of oservtions At initil time 0 t t J J e x x K H x y where : oservtion deprture from the ckground stte y H x

Evlution of the impct of oservtions At initil time J J e x L x L K H x y where : oservtion deprture from the ckground stte Computtion of the Oservtion Impct: One cn otin w y slightly dpting the ssimiltion to solve y H x 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 t t J J F x x w Hw R Hw w B w w Hw R x x K 1 0 t t J J t t 0 J J x x

Comined Use of ADJ nd OSEs (Gelro et l., 2008) ADJ pplied to vrious OSE memers to exmine how the mix of oservtions influences their impcts Removl of AMSUA results in lrge increse in AIRS (nd other) impcts Removl of AIRS results in significnt increse in AMSUA impct Removl of ros results in significnt increse in AMSUA, ircrft nd other impcts (ut not AIRS)

Frction of Oservtions tht Improve the Forecst GEOS-5 July 2005 00z (Gelro, 2008) AIRS Control No AMSU-A AMSU-A Control No AIRS only smll mjority of the oservtions improve the forecst

Key nlysis errors lgorithm configurtion (Lroche et l., 2002) rue Stte of the Atmosphere GEM Reference nlysis Key nlysis error Sensitivity nlysis Initil nlysis Forecst error (e 24 ) 0 hr 24 hr Key nlysis error GEM x 0 x ( ngent liner ) 24 Minimiztion lgorithm 3 itertions J x 0 GEM (Adjoint) J x 24 J J=Energy of ( x 24 e 24 )

Modelling ckground-error covrinces using sensitivities he dpted 3D-Vr Structure functions defined with respect to posteriori sensitivities; Flow dependent structure functions were introduced in the 3D-Vr; ~ ~ 2~ ~ B I B I ff ξ 1 Error vrince long f: 1 2 2 1 σ1 Does flow-dependent ckground error formultion improve the nlysis nd susequent forecst? (Lupu 2006)

Cse study of Jnury 27, 2003 Forecst verifiction, 12 UC Jnury 28, 2003 CMC nlysis Glol-GEM 24hr opertionl forecst Se Level Pressure (4 hp)

Cse study Glol sensitivity function Initil temperture corrections for the 12 UC Jnury 27, 2003 nlysis 700hP Corrections responsile for the forecst improvement of the Cndin Mritimes system nd cross section of initil temperture correction mde long the rrow.

Impct of the dpted 3D-Vr in the nlysis 700hP Difference etween the temperture nlysis increments for 12 UC Jnury 27, 2003 nlysis 3D dpted -3D stndrd nd cross section.

Cse study Forecst improvement Energy (totl) of the forecst error verge over Northern Hemisphere Extr-tropics (25N - 90N) Glol-GEM opertionl forecst Energy (J/Kg) Glol-GEM dpted forecst Glol-GEM sensitivity forecst Forecst hour

Fit to the oservtionl Dt Do the corrections decrese or increse the deprture etween the nlysis nd the oservtions? Δ J o J( x ) J( x ) o 1,2 3DVr o 3DVr J( o x ) > 0 = increse < 0 = decrese Difference reltive en Jo (%) 1- Sensitivity nlysis Difference reltive en Jo (%) 2- Adpted 3D-Vr nlysis RAOB AIREP SURFC AOV SAWIND OAL RAOB AIREP SURFC AOV SAWIND OAL

Fit to the oservtionl Dt Positive vlues men tht the sensitivity nlysis is further wy from the os. thn the initil nlysis (sme conclusions from ECMWF, Isksen et l., 2004); Negtive vlues men tht the dpted 3D-Vr nlysis is closer to the os. (due to the increse ckground-error vrince); Difference reltive en Jo (%) 1- Sensitivity nlysis Difference reltive en Jo (%) 2- Adpted 3D-Vr nlysis RAOB AIREP SURFC AOV SAWIND OAL RAOB AIREP SURFC AOV SAWIND OAL

Oservility of flow-dependent structures Adpted 3D-Vr for which the structure functions where defined y normlizing the posteriori sensitivity function 2 Consider the cse where B vv nd the nlysis increment is then with σ δx 2 K y Hx Kd αv 1 ( Hv) R ( Hv) R 1 d ( Hv) σ 1 σ 2 C1 2 C 2 nd 1 C 1 ( Hv) R d C2 ( Hv) R ( Hv) 1

Associted informtion content nd oservility Evlution of the DFS in this cse 2 C2 DFS trhk 2 C lim DFS 1 1 2 Correltion etween the innovtions nd structure function 1 ( Hv) R d C1 ρ 1 1/ 2 1 1/ 2 1/ ( Hv) R ( Hv) d R d (2C2J o(0)) 2 his defines the oservility of structure functions * Cn the oservtions detect given structure function

Exmple from 1D-Vr experiments Consider the following cses * Oservtions re generted from the sme structure function s tht used in the ssimiltion * Oservtions re generted from different structure function (phse shift) * Signl hs n mplitude lower thn the level of oservtion error

Oservility s function of oservtion error y' 2( Hv) N os. C 1 C 2 ρ 10 os. 1.29 0.64 0.99 20 os. 1.96 0.97 0.99 40 os. 2.26 1.13 1. y' 2( Hv) 2 o =1 ε o 10 os. 0.95 0.64 0.38 20 os. 1.15 0.97 0.22 40 os. 1.48 1.13 0.20 y' 2( Hv) 2 o =4 ε o 10 os. 0.89 0.64 0.17 20 os. 0.89 0.97 0.11 40 os. 0.87 1.13 0.08

Experiment with the sme function

Experiment with shifted function

Experiments with n dpted 3D-Vr A posteriori sensitivities depend on * rget re * Norm used to mesure the forecst error * Initil norm * Definition of the tngent-liner nd djoint model Experiments with n dpted 3D-Vr sed on EC s 3D-Vr ssimiltion * Dry energy norm * Four cses documented in Cron et l. (2007): Jnury 19, 2002, 00UC, Feurry 6, 2002, 00UC Jnury 6, 2003 12UC; Jnury 27, 2003 12UC * rget re: glol, hemispheric (25-90N) nd locl (re on the Est Cost of North Americ) * Imposition of nonliner lnce constrint (Cron et l., 2007)

Preliminry test: does it work? Normlized nlysis increment of 3D-Vr s structure function * Limiting cse where B = 2 vv * Does the dpted 3D-Vr recover the right mplitude * his prticulr choice insures tht we hve structure tht cn fit the oservtions.

Oservility for the test cse Os. type Jnury 27, 2003 Correltion coefficient Jnury 06, 2003 Ferury 06, 2002 Jnury 19, 2002 RAOB 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.76 AIREP 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.72 AMV 0.68 0.72 0.72 0.73 SURFC 0.69 0.74 0.75 0.76 AOVS 0.59 0.58 0.71 0.65 OAL 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.74

Oservility of different structure functions sed on key nlyses Structure functions Os. type Jnury 27, 2003, correltion coefficient Jnury 06, 2003 Ferury 06, 2002 Jnury 19, 2002 GLOBAL RAOB 0.01 0.02 0.03-0.01 AIREP 0.00 0.02-0.01-0.01 AOVS 0.13 0.11 0.07 0.12 OAL 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.03 LOCAL RAOB -0.01 0-0.01-0.02 AIREP -0.03-0.01-0.03-0.03 AOVS 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.02 OAL 0 0 0-0.01 HEMISPHERIC RAOB 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 AIREP -0.05 0.02-0.02-0.03 AOVS 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.04 OAL 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.02 PV-BAL RAOB 0.01 0 0.01 0 AIREP -0.03 0.01-0.03 0 AOVS 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.05 OAL 0.03-0.01 0.06 0.02

Oservility of pseudo-inverse otined from finite numer of singulr vectors (Mhidji et l., 2007) Leding singulr vectors re the structures tht will grow the most rpidly over finite period of time * Leding 60 SVs were computed sed on totl dry energy norm t led time of 48-h * he forecst error is projected onto those SVs t the finl time which llows to express the error t initil time tht explins tht forecst error (pseudo-inverse) Experiments * 18 cses were considered in Decemer 2007 * Are those structures oservle from ville oservtions? * Oservility of SV 1, the leding singulr vectors * Oservility of the pseudo-inverse

Oservility of the leding singulr vector nd pseudoinverse Dte Os. type SV no. 1 Initil time Correltion coefficient SV no. 1 Finl time Pseudo-inverse 2007120100 OAL 0.0098 0.0067 0.0169 2007120212 OAL 0.0140-0.0179-0.0011 2007120400 OAL -0.0187-0.0211-0.0034 2007120512 OAL 0.0022-0.0020 0.0124 2007120700 OAL 0.0159 0.0020-0.0033 2007120812 OAL 0.0019 0.0212 0.0062 2007121000 OAL -0.0029-0.0151 0.0040 2007121112 OAL 0.0054 0.0148 0.0096 2007121300 OAL 0.0125-0.0241-0.0028 2007121412 OAL 0.0224-0.056 0.0209 2007121600 OAL 0.0125 0.0235 0.0234 2007121712 OAL 0.0041 0.0465-0.0064 2007121900 OAL 0.0119-0.0097-0.0010 2007122012 OAL 0.0067 0.0217 0.0047 2007122200 OAL 0.0103-0.0084-0.0053 2007122312 OAL 0.0099-0.0068 0.0110 2007122500 OAL -0.0020-0.0065-0.0059 2007122612 OAL -0.0086 0.0056-0.0117

Summry nd conclusions Evlution of the informtion content of oservtions cn e otined from simple dignostics using informtion generted y ny ssimiltion system * Impct of oservtions depends on the oserving environment * Offer mesure of the consistency etween the sttistics used in the ssimiltion nd those dignosed through comprison to oservtions Impct of oservtions on forecsts cn e quntified s well, sed on method proposed y Lnglnd nd Bker (2004) * Mesurement sed on ckwrd integrtion of the djoint model * Sme ingredients tht re used to compute key nlyses to pinpoint the source of the forecst error * Oservtion impct is defined with respect to their correltion with respect to tht prticulr structure * Our results my explin in prt why only hlf the oservtions hve positive impcts

Conclusion (cont d) Oservility of structure functions hs een defined in oservtion spce s correltion etween innovtions nd the structure function Even though those structures do correspond to structure tht will grow the most or grow to correct the forecst error t given led time * A posteriori sensitivities re not well correlted with oservtions his hs een tested for different wys to compute the sensitivities * Singulr vectors were not found to e oservle either Reduced rnk Klmn filters do not seem to e pproprite to represent the ckground error covrinces in n ssimiltion system Evolved covrinces s estimted with n Ensemle Klmn filter would e more pproprite for n hyrid 4D-Vr ssimiltion