Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Similar documents
Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Cripps Ranch 76+/- Acres Orchard Development Opportunity Dixon, CA. Presented By:

Appendix 2b. NRCS Soil Survey

Producing Chandler Walnut Orchard

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Ocean County, New Jersey (Larsen & N New Prospect Jackson Twp., NJ)

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Custom Soil Resource Report. Soil Map. Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 14N WGS84. Feet.

CRUM RANCH AREA MAP YOLO COUNTY, California, AC +/-

Custom Soil Resource Report for Victoria County, Texas

Soil Taxonomy Classification Osage County, Kansas. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

T his map is for illus trative purpos es only and does not repres ent a s urvey. I t is provided 'as is ' without warranty or any repres entation of

RANCHO de DOS PALMAS DAVIS, California, AC +/-

Soil Taxonomy Classification Jackson County, Florida (Chipola River) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Wright County, MN. Overview. Legend

Chittenden Road Prune Orchard Corning, California

FOR SALE. Features Rives Road Petersburg, Virginia Chris Jenkins

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. GALE RANCH

² 2015 Program Year. Farm Tract McLeod County, Minnesota 1:4, NHEL NHEL

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Soil Taxonomy Classification Washington County, Florida (Pine Log 631A)

BUNCOMBE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Custom Soil Resource Report for Solano County, California

Soil Taxonomy Classification Gadsden County, Florida (Imperial Nursery)

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

Exhibit RMP-4. Foote Creek Geology and Topography

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi 30 27' 27'' 30 26' 57''

Old Thomasson Range, Chico, CA

Sacramento River Farmland Anderson, California

Carrick Road $798,000

Fall River Valley Irrigated Farmland

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. BOWLSBEY 320 LIBERTY ISLAND ROAD BUYER: RASSMUSSEN TRUST

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Hartmann Ranch. potential vineyard ground acres +/

Using the Web Soil Survey Resilience and Resistance Score Sheet Soils Report

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

TRACT 7: ±252 Acres Irrigated Farmland Grassland

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Valley County, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbus County, North Carolina

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Northwestern Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cuyahoga County, Ohio

Custom Soil Resource Report for Stevens County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Island County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fresno County, California, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Missoula County Area, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Atlantic County, New Jersey

Alliance Ag Services, LLC

Custom Soil Resource Report for St. Lucie County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon, and Marion County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Luis Obispo County, California, Paso Robles Area

O\.OLSSON \ ASSOC I ATES

Custom Soil Resource Report for Potter County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Palo Verde Area, California

Custom Soil Resource Report for Custer and Pennington Counties Area, Black Hills Parts, South Dakota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Southwest Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Waste Management Plan

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Washington

PARADIGM ODP FORT COLLINS, CO 80525

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Custom Soil Resource Report for Garfield County, Oklahoma

Aqua Dome Express Car Wash

Custom Soil Resource Report for Livingston Parish, Louisiana

2.a.. Physical Factors General Map

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Custom Soil Resource Report for Santa Fe Area, New Mexico, Santa Fe County and Part of Rio Arriba County; and Santa Fe County Area, New Mexico

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wasco County, Oregon, Northern Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gem County Area, Idaho

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pinal County, Arizona, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Marion County Area, Oregon

APPENDICES TABLE OF CONTENTS


Custom Soil Resource Report for Falls County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cumberland County, New Jersey

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Juan Area, Puerto Rico

Aperio Property Consultants, llc E. Grand Ave. Aurora, CO Phone (303) Contact: Aaron Thompson

Custom Soil Resource Report for Washoe County, Nevada, South Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hansford County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Northumberland County, Pennsylvania

SOIL TEST REPORTING ELKO SPORTS COMPLEX

Transcription:

252500 252600 252700 252800 252900 253000 253100 83 47' 15'' W 83 47' 49'' W Nonirrigated Capability Class Jackson and Owsley Counties, Kentucky (Peggy Wilson Booneville Property - ) 253200 253300 37 25' 39'' N 4144900 4144900 4145000 4145000 4145100 4145100 4145200 4145200 4145300 4145300 4145400 4145400 4145500 4145500 4145600 4145600 4145700 4145700 4145800 4145800 4145900 4145900 37 25' 39'' N Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 37 25' 2'' N 37 25' 2'' N N 252600 252700 252800 252900 253000 Map Scale: 1:5,480 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters 50 100 200 300 0 253100 253200 253300 83 47' 15'' W 83 47' 49'' W 252500 Feet 0 250 500 1000 1500 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 Page 1 of 5

Nonirrigated Capability Class Jackson and Owsley Counties, Kentucky (Peggy Wilson Booneville Property - ) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons I II V I II III Soil Rating Lines I II V I II III Soil Rating Points I II V I II III Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Topographic Map Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jackson and Owsley Counties, Kentucky Survey Area Data: Version 14, Oct 3, 2017 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 23, 2017 Oct 16, 2014 Mar The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Page 2 of 5

Nonirrigated Capability Class Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI GnC Gilpin silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes 3 3.4 6.7% GrD Gilpin-Rayne-Sequoia silt loams, 12 to 25 percent slopes Ro Rowdy silt loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, occasionally flooded SgF SrF Shelocta-Gilpin complex, 20 to 65 percent slopes, stony Steinsburg and Gilpin soils and rock outcrop, steep 4 2.6 5.1% 2 6.7 13.2% 7 31.0 60.9% 7 7.2 14.1% Totals for Area of Interest 50.9 100.0% Page 3 of 5

Description Land capability classification shows, in a general way, the suitability of soils for most kinds of field crops. Crops that require special management are excluded. The soils are grouped according to their limitations for field crops, the risk of damage if they are used for crops, and the way they respond to management. The criteria used in grouping the soils do not include major and generally expensive landforming that would change slope, depth, or other characteristics of the soils, nor do they include possible but unlikely major reclamation projects. Capability classification is not a substitute for interpretations that show suitability and limitations of groups of soils for rangeland, for woodland, or for engineering purposes. In the capability system, soils are generally grouped at three levels-capability class, subclass, and unit. Only class and subclass are included in this data set. Capability classes, the broadest groups, are designated by the numbers 1 through 8. The numbers indicate progressively greater limitations and narrower choices for practical use. The classes are defined as follows: Class 1 soils have few limitations that restrict their use. Class 2 soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require moderate conservation practices. Class 3 soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require special conservation practices, or both. Class 4 soils have very severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require very careful management, or both. Class 5 soils are subject to little or no erosion but have other limitations, impractical to remove, that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 6 soils have severe limitations that make them generally unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 7 soils have very severe limitations that make them unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to grazing, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 8 soils and miscellaneous areas have limitations that preclude commercial plant production and that restrict their use to recreational purposes, wildlife habitat, watershed, or esthetic purposes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Page 4 of 5

Tie-break Rule: Higher Page 5 of 5