Montmorency County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria

Similar documents
Montmorency County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria

Drivers in Crashes Per 10K Population. *2013 Population of Michigan Counties (by single- year of age) not yet available from U.S.

Annual Collision Report

collision analyses...

Chapter 1 0+7= 1+6= 2+5= 3+4= 4+3= 5+2= 6+1= 7+0= How would you write five plus two equals seven?

Bike Week Crash Analysis

Winter Storm Response - January 2016 Due to the uncertainty of the event, we must be prepared

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SURVEILLANCE IMPACT ON SAMPLE CONSTRUCTION ZONES IN MISSISSIPPI (Part 1: DESCRIPTIVE)

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

VIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS

Trip and Parking Generation Study of Orem Fitness Center-Abstract

Preliminary Material Data Sheet

Parking Study MAIN ST

Active Traffic & Safety Management System for Interstate 77 in Virginia. Chris McDonald, PE VDOT Southwest Regional Operations Director

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer

Factors Affecting the Severity of Injuries Sustained in Collisions with Roadside Objects

DAILY QUESTIONS 28 TH JUNE 18 REASONING - CALENDAR

Monroe County: Key West and Lower Keys

The Urbana Free Library Parking and Transportation Study

Checklist: Deposing the Driver in an Auto Accident

Mountain View Community Shuttle Monthly Operations Report

City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA

Snow Removal Policy WARREN COUNTY ENGINEER S OFFICE (WCEO) WARREN COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. October 16, 2014

INTRODUCTION PURPOSE DATA COLLECTION

3. If a forecast is too high when compared to an actual outcome, will that forecast error be positive or negative?

Mountain View Community Shuttle Monthly Operations Report

TOPIC # Postscript Choices Related to Modes of Transportation & The Laws of Motion

Choosing a Safe Vehicle Challenge: Analysis: Measuring Speed Challenge: Analysis: Reflection:

SEASONAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF ROAD FATALITIES IN EUROPE

Speed Limit Review. Montague Road, West End. Prepared for Brisbane City Council CEB06842 CEB06842

Transportation Accident

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008

IOWA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 22 IOWA COUNTY SNOW & ICE POLICY

Annual Report. Registrar of Motor Vehicles. Department of Infrastructure Government of Northwest Territories

Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945

ATTENTION PARENTS/GUARDIANS PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED INFORMATION AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS OR RETURN IF APPLICABLE

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY

AASHTO Committee on Maintenance 2018 Annual Meeting July 25, Hurricane Irma- Preparation and Response

TEEN DRIVER SEAT BELT OBSERVATION FORM

Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland

My Calendar Notebook

Chapter 1 The Rain Gauge

FDOT Level 2 Roundabout b/c Evaluation

[LLNVS01000 L EA0000 LVRCF A 18X MO# ] Notice of Temporary Closure of Public Land in Clark County, Nevada

Responsive Traffic Management Through Short-Term Weather and Collision Prediction

Exploring Nature With Children A Guided Journal Cursive Edition by Lynn Seddon

BAD WEATHER DOESN T CAUSE ACCIDENTS

ISO Lead Auditor Lean Six Sigma PMP Business Process Improvement Enterprise Risk Management IT Sales Training

Data Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety

Date: Wed 12 July 2017 Reference Number: FOI Category: Stats - Crime

POLICE SERVICES BOARD AGENDA

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission

Road Safety and Environmental Aspects of Winter Maintenance

Resolution Number: (2) Resolution Title: Snow Policy Date Signed: 11/26/12. DAVIS COUNTY Snow Policy Resolution

Epic Roanoke, Blacksburg snow day halts work, spurs play

Thomas Lich, Jörg Mönnich, Nora Reiter, Alexander Skiera, Thomas Schlender, Andreas Georgi*

Injury Related Morbidity and Mortality Following Tornadoes in Alabama on April 27, 2011: Survey Instrument Training

Report TR-CW That staff be authorized to install signage on roads identified in Schedule A as excluded from By-law ; and

Label the lines below with S for the same meanings or D for different meanings.

End of winter? We have records to break, more snow to shovel

The Newsletter of the Summerlakes Homeowners Association

Motorcycle Sales January 9 February 7 March 10 April 8 May 7 June 12 July 10 August 11 September 12 October 10 November 14 December 16

ISO Lead Auditor Lean Six Sigma PMP Business Process Improvement Enterprise Risk Management IT Sales Training

RESOLUTION NO INTRODUCTION

In the Matter of the Study of State Police Stop Activity at the Southern end of the New Jersey Turnpike

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

JANUARY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY

ISO Lead Auditor Lean Six Sigma PMP Business Process Improvement Enterprise Risk Management IT Sales Training

QUANTIFICATION OF THE NATURAL VARIATION IN TRAFFIC FLOW ON SELECTED NATIONAL ROADS IN SOUTH AFRICA

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Engineering Services Division Technical Memorandum No MAT-02 October 7, 2014

National Rural ITS Conference 2006

2019 Settlement Calendar for ASX Cash Market Products. ASX Settlement

HSIP FUNDING APPLICATION

Q1. (a) The diagram shows a car being driven at 14 rn/s. The driver has forgotten to clear a thick layer of snow from the roof.

Passover Days CE

Municipal Act, 2001 Loi de 2001 sur les municipalités

General Certificate of Secondary Education Higher Tier

U.S. - Canadian Border Traffic Prediction

Sensory Map. of the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences

One person killed when tornadoes hit Oklahoma, Arkansas (Update) 25 March 2015, byjustin Juozapavicius

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Urban Traffic Accidents: A Case Study of Tehran City, Iran

CEDAR COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6

Significant Flooding Expected

Life (and Fewer Deaths) after Seat Belts

AirSafe.com traffic spikes heat maps May 2006 to November 2015 Todd Curtis November 22, 2015

January SUNDAY. State Representative Joseph A. Petrarca. Compliments of

5, 0. Math 112 Fall 2017 Midterm 1 Review Problems Page Which one of the following points lies on the graph of the function f ( x) (A) (C) (B)

New Jersey Department of Transportation Extreme Weather Asset Management Pilot Study

Math 112 Spring 2018 Midterm 1 Review Problems Page 1

Tornadoes Impacting Interstates: Service and Societal Considerations

Evaluation of the City of Scottsdale Loop 101 Photo Enforcement Demonstration Program

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D KIRK HALL BOWEN & BOWEN LTD.

JANUARY Single Ad Business Card Size: 3.5 x 2. Single Ad Business Card Size: 3.5 x 2. Double Ad Ad Size: 3.5 x 4.125

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

El Niño & Expected Florida Severe Weather

CHALLENGE #1: ROAD CONDITIONS

Understand FORWARD COLLISION WARNING WHAT IS IT? HOW DOES IT WORK? HOW TO USE IT?

1) A = {19, 20, 21, 22, 23} B = {18, 19, 20, 21, 22} 2) 2) 3) 3) A) {q, r, t, y, z} B) {r, s, t, y, z} C) {r, t, z} D) {q, s, u, v, x, y} 4) 4) 6) 6)

A week in the life of. Time days of the week. copy

Determine the trend for time series data

Transcription:

June 2017 Revised 10/3/17 2016 Reporting Criteria Please pay particular attention to the wording when interpreting the three levels of data gathered for this report. Crash The Crash Level analyzes data related to crash events and returns one result per crash. Examples: Time, weather, and location. Units The Units Level analyzes the experience of the units in the crash and returns one result per vehicle, driver, pedestrian, bicyclist, or train. Examples: Vehicle type, driver condition, and unit events. People The People Level analyzes the experience of the people involved in the crash and returns one result per occupant/person/party. Examples: Age, injury severity, and seat belt or helmet use. KABCO Injury Indicator: K = Killed A = Suspected Serious Injury B = Suspected Minor Injury C = Possible Injury O = No Injury Property Damage Only (PDO) Montmorency County 2016 Traffic Crash Data & 2012-2016 5-Year Trends Sources: The crashes in this report occurred on public roadways in Michigan and resulted in injuries, fatalities, or property damage (with $1,000 as a reporting threshold). The information was gathered from Michigan Traffic Crash Report Forms (UD-10) submitted by local police departments, sheriff's offices, and the Michigan State Police. Other related information was obtained from the departments of Transportation, State, and Community Health.

This page left intentionally blank

Montmorency County 1 by most severe injury (mapped/actual) K - (2/2) A - Suspected Serious (2/2) Montmorency County In 2016: There were 420 drivers involved in 371 motor vehicle crashes in Montmorency County. Of those crashes, 2 were classified as fatal, resulting in 2 fatalities. An additional 31 persons were injured. Montmorency County experienced the highest number of motor vehicle crashes (48) in November, the highest number of fatal crashes (1) and the highest number of persons killed (1) in January and September. Michigan driver statistics indicate 4.5 percent of licensed drivers in Montmorency County were age 16-20, and 10.0 percent of drivers in crashes were also in that age group. 2016 - and Injuries by Month Month 2016 - Vehicles in Vehicle Type Injury Property Damage Only (PDO) ities Persons Injuries January 31 1 4 26 1 6 February 32 0 4 28 0 4 March 25 0 1 24 0 1 April 19 0 1 18 0 1 May 24 0 2 22 0 2 June 35 0 1 34 0 1 July 25 0 2 23 0 2 August 34 0 5 29 0 5 September 31 1 3 27 1 3 October 31 0 0 31 0 0 November 48 0 3 45 0 4 December 36 0 2 34 0 2 371 2 28 341 2 31 2016 - Driver Statistics Age Group 2016 Population Motor Vehicles Number of Vehicles % of Number % of Injury Number PDO Number Passenger car, SUV, van 271 64.5 1 25.0 21 249 Motor home 10 2.4 0 0.0 0 10 Pickup truck 115 27.4 2 50.0 8 105 Small truck under 10,000 lbs. GVWR 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 Motorcycle 6 1.4 1 25.0 1 4 Moped / goped 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 Go-cart / golf cart 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 Snowmobile 4 1.0 0 0.0 3 1 Off-Road Vehicle - ORV / All- Terrain Vehicle - ATV Statewide Licensed in Per 10k Population Driver Rates Per 10k Licensed 0-15 1,176 26 3 25.5 1,153.8 16-20 385 342 42 1,090.9 1,228.1 21-24 284 266 25 880.3 939.8 25-64 4,535 4,258 284 626.2 667.0 65 + 2,793 2,759 59 211.2 213.8 Unknown 0 0 7 - - - - 9,173 7,651 420 457.9 548.9 2 0.5 0 0.0 2 0 Other 4 1.0 0 0.0 1 3 Truck/bus over 10,000 lbs. 7 1.7 0 0.0 2 5 Unknown 1 0.2 0 0.0 0 1 420 100.0 4 100.0 38 378

2 5-Year Trend - by Month Month January 33 0 27 0 25 0 28 0 31 1 February 30 0 22 0 17 0 18 0 32 0 March 25 0 15 0 23 0 14 0 25 0 April 17 1 22 1 17 1 24 0 19 0 May 12 0 17 1 27 0 23 0 24 0 June 17 0 17 0 38 0 32 0 35 0 July 20 0 18 0 21 0 32 0 25 0 August 21 0 19 1 16 0 21 0 34 0 September 34 0 41 1 19 0 18 0 31 1 October 31 0 31 0 32 0 35 0 31 0 November 43 0 60 0 47 0 55 0 48 0 December 18 0 47 0 37 0 18 0 36 0 301 1 336 4 319 1 318 0 371 2 Note: Indicates that the highest number of total crashes reported in the 5-year period occurred in the same month 5-Year Trend - by Day of Week Day Monday 39 1 45 2 45 0 44 0 51 1 Tuesday 45 0 49 0 35 0 34 0 42 0 Wednesday 37 0 49 0 42 0 56 0 66 0 Thursday 50 0 47 0 42 0 49 0 54 0 Friday 45 0 57 0 58 0 56 0 67 0 Saturday 49 0 50 1 47 1 41 0 53 1 Sunday 36 0 39 1 50 0 38 0 38 0 301 1 336 4 319 1 318 0 371 2 Note: Indicates that the highest number of total crashes reported in the 5-year period occurred on the same day of the week

3 2016 - by Day of Week Day Number All Injury % of Number % of PDO A B C Number Monday 51 13.7 1 50.0 0 0 4 46 Tuesday 42 11.3 0 0.0 0 0 0 42 Wednesday 66 17.8 0 0.0 0 0 5 61 Thursday 54 14.6 0 0.0 0 1 2 51 Friday 67 18.1 0 0.0 1 5 3 58 Saturday 53 14.3 1 50.0 1 2 0 49 Sunday 38 10.2 0 0.0 0 0 4 34 371 100.0 2 100.0 2 8 18 341

4 5-Year Trend - by Weekday and Weekend Portion of Week Weekday 216 1 247 2 222 0 239 0 280 1 Weekend 85 0 89 2 97 1 79 0 91 1 301 1 336 4 319 1 318 0 371 2 Weekday Weekend 2012 216 85 301 2013 247 89 336 2014 222 97 319 2015 239 79 318 2016 280 91 371 Average 241 88 329

5 5-Year Trend - by Time of Day Time of Day Midnight - 2:59 AM 16 0 12 0 19 0 21 0 13 0 3:00 AM - 5:59 AM 14 0 18 0 15 0 25 0 28 0 6:00 AM - 8:59 AM 71 0 68 1 59 0 65 0 73 0 9:00 AM - 11:59 AM 32 0 34 1 31 0 31 0 38 0 Noon - 2:59 PM 35 0 40 0 37 0 39 0 39 0 3:00 PM - 5:59 PM 27 0 53 0 52 0 33 0 47 1 6:00 PM - 8:59 PM 54 0 56 2 59 0 64 0 80 0 9:00 PM - 11:59 PM 52 1 54 0 47 1 40 0 53 1 Unknown 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 1 336 4 319 1 318 0 371 2 Note: Indicates that the highest number of total crashes reported in the 5-year period occurred in the same time period Midnight 3:00 AM - - 2:59 AM 5:59 AM 6:00 AM - 8:59 AM 9:00 AM - 11:59 AM Noon - 2:59 PM 3:00 PM - 5:59 PM 6:00 PM - 8:59 PM 9:00 PM - 11:59 PM Unknown 2012 16 14 71 32 35 27 54 52 0 301 2013 12 18 68 34 40 53 56 54 1 336 2014 19 15 59 31 37 52 59 47 0 319 2015 21 25 65 31 39 33 64 40 0 318 2016 13 28 73 38 39 47 80 53 0 371 Average 16 20 67 33 38 42 63 49 0 329 Midnight 3:00 AM - - 2:59 AM 5:59 AM 6:00 AM - 8:59 AM 9:00 AM - 11:59 AM Noon - 2:59 PM 3:00 PM - 5:59 PM 6:00 PM - 8:59 PM 9:00 PM - 11:59 PM Unknown 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2013 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 4 2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2016 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 Average 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

6 2016 - Time and Severity Time of Day Number All Injury % of Number % of PDO A B C Number Midnight - 2:59 AM 13 3.5 0 0.0 0 0 0 13 3:00 AM - 5:59 AM 28 7.5 0 0.0 0 0 2 26 6:00 AM - 8:59 AM 73 19.7 0 0.0 0 2 2 69 9:00 AM - 11:59 AM 38 10.2 0 0.0 0 0 2 36 Noon - 2:59 PM 39 10.5 0 0.0 1 3 5 30 3:00 PM - 5:59 PM 47 12.7 1 50.0 0 0 1 45 6:00 PM - 8:59 PM 80 21.6 0 0.0 0 2 4 74 9:00 PM - 11:59 PM 53 14.3 1 50.0 1 1 2 48 Unknown 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 371 100.0 2 100.0 2 8 18 341

7 5-Year Trend - Deer-Involved by Time of Day Time of Day Midnight - 2:59 AM 11 0 8 0 11 0 11 0 8 0 3:00 AM - 5:59 AM 11 0 17 0 13 0 23 0 23 0 6:00 AM - 8:59 AM 56 0 55 0 45 0 46 0 61 0 9:00 AM - 11:59 AM 17 0 18 0 19 0 15 0 21 0 Noon - 2:59 PM 13 0 11 0 15 0 6 0 12 0 3:00 PM - 5:59 PM 14 0 23 0 20 0 16 0 21 0 6:00 PM - 8:59 PM 42 0 46 0 38 0 48 0 60 0 9:00 PM - 11:59 PM 36 0 43 0 37 0 33 0 40 0 Unknown 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 222 0 198 0 198 0 246 0 Note: Indicates that the highest number of total crashes reported in the 5-year period occurred in the same time period Midnight - 2:59 AM 3:00 AM - 5:59 AM 6:00 AM - 8:59 AM 9:00 AM - 11:59 AM Noon - 2:59 PM 3:00 PM - 5:59 PM 6:00 PM - 8:59 PM 9:00 PM - 11:59 PM Unknown 2012 11 11 56 17 13 14 42 36 0 200 2013 8 17 55 18 11 23 46 43 1 222 2014 11 13 45 19 15 20 38 37 0 198 2015 11 23 46 15 6 16 48 33 0 198 2016 8 23 61 21 12 21 60 40 0 246 Average 10 17 53 18 11 19 47 38 0 213 There were no fatal deer-involved crashes in Montmorency County in 2016

8 2016 - Reported Motor Vehicle by Municipality Municipality Injury Property Damage US Route State Route Local Street Interstate Alcohol- Involved Drug- Involved Deer- Involved ities Persons Albert Twp. 57 0 7 50 0 0 0 56 3 0 24 0 7 Avery Twp. 32 0 2 30 0 0 25 7 0 0 24 0 2 Briley Twp. 73 1 7 65 0 0 50 23 1 0 45 1 10 Hillman 11 0 2 9 0 0 5 6 0 0 5 0 2 Hillman Twp. 57 0 3 54 0 0 6 51 2 0 46 0 3 Loud Twp. 45 1 2 42 0 0 35 10 1 0 36 1 2 Montmorency Twp. 32 0 0 32 0 0 7 25 0 0 24 0 0 Rust Twp. 28 0 2 26 0 0 14 14 2 0 24 0 2 Vienna Twp. 36 0 3 33 0 0 25 11 0 0 18 0 3 Unknown Community 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 371 2 28 341 0 0 167 203 9 0 246 2 31 Injuries

9 5-Year Trend - in Coded Drinking by Driver Age Driver Age in Coded Drinking in Coded Drinking in Coded Drinking in Coded Drinking in Coded Drinking 0-15 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 16-20 29 0 29 1 30 0 40 2 42 2 21-24 22 3 28 2 23 0 26 1 25 1 25-64 232 9 259 3 253 5 234 3 284 5 65 + 47 0 58 1 56 1 66 0 59 1 Unknown 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 334 12 379 7 363 6 369 6 420 9 0-15 16-20 21-24 25-64 65 + Unknown 2012 0 29 22 232 47 4 334 2013 1 29 28 259 58 4 379 2014 1 30 23 253 56 0 363 2015 2 40 26 234 66 1 369 2016 3 42 25 284 59 7 420 Average 1 34 25 252 57 3 373 0-15 16-20 21-24 25-64 65 + Unknown 2012 0 0 3 9 0 0 12 2013 0 1 2 3 1 0 7 2014 0 0 0 5 1 0 6 2015 0 2 1 3 0 0 6 2016 0 2 1 5 1 0 9 Average 0 1 1 5 1 0 8

10 2016 - Bodily Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Results Among All Vehicle in Alcohol-Involved by Age Age Group in Alcohol- Involved Tested in all Coded Drinking, Tested Coded Drinking BAC Result Range for Coded Drinking BAC = 0.00 BAC 0.01 g/dl to 0.07 g/dl BAC 0.08 g/dl to 0.16 g/dl BAC 0.17 g/dl and Above BAC Not Reported 0-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16-20 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 21-24 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 25-64 8 8 3 5 0 1 1 0 3 65 + 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 10 5 9 0 1 2 1 5 Notes: BAC measured in grams (g) per deciliter (dl). BAC may not be reported if drivers are not tested or if the results are not available immediately (as in the case of a blood test). A driver may be coded by the officer as drinking even though no test is administered. Alcohol-Involved In 2016, there were 12 drivers in alcohol-involved crashes; 9 (75.0%) of those drivers were coded as had-been-drinking by the officer on the crash form. 3 (33.3%) of the 9 drivers had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 g/dl (grams per deciliter) or greater, and 1 (33.3%) of the 3 drivers had a BAC at or above 0.17 g/dl. 5 (55.6%) of the 9 drivers were coded as had-beendrinking and were tested for alcohol consumption. 5-Year Trend - Involving Alcohol Year All HBD % HBD HBD % HBD A Injury HBD A Injury % HBD B Injury HBD B Injury 2012 301 12 4.0 1 1 100.0 4 1 25.0 12 2 16.7 2013 336 7 2.1 4 1 25.0 2 0 0.0 10 0 0.0 2014 319 6 1.9 1 1 100.0 2 0 0.0 10 1 10.0 2015 318 6 1.9 0 0 0.0 6 0 0.0 9 1 11.1 2016 371** 9 2.4 2 2** 100.0 2 0 0.0 8* 1 12.5 Note: * Indicates that the most recent year is the lowest number or percentage reported in the 5-year period in that column ** Indicates that the most recent year is the highest number or percentage reported in the 5-year period in that column % HBD Note: Had-Been-Drinking (HBD)

11 5-Year Trend - Involving Drugs Year All Drug % Drug Drug % Drug A Injury Drug A Injury % Drug B Injury Drug B Injury 2012 301 0 0.0 1 0 0.0 4 0 0.0 12 0 0.0 2013 336 2 0.6 4 2 50.0 2 0 0.0 10 0 0.0 2014 319 2 0.6 1 0 0.0 2 0 0.0 10 0 0.0 2015 318 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 6 0 0.0 9 0 0.0 2016 371** 0 0.0 2 0 0.0 2 0 0.0 8* 0 0.0 Note: * Indicates that the most recent year is the lowest number or percentage reported in the 5-year period in that column ** Indicates that the most recent year is the highest number or percentage reported in the 5-year period in that column % Drug

12 5-Year Trend - Involving Alcohol or Drugs Year All HBD or Drug % HBD or Drug HBD or Drug % HBD or Drug A Injury HBD or Drug A Injury % HBD or Drug B Injury HBD or Drug B Injury 2012 301 12 4.0 1 1 100.0 4 1 25.0 12 2 16.7 2013 336 8 2.4 4 2 50.0 2 0 0.0 10 0 0.0 2014 319 6 1.9 1 1 100.0 2 0 0.0 10 1 10.0 2015 318 6 1.9 0 0 0.0 6 0 0.0 9 1 11.1 2016 371** 9 2.4 2 2 100.0 2 0 0.0 8* 1 12.5 Note: * Indicates that the most recent year is the lowest number or percentage reported in the 5-year period in that column ** Indicates that the most recent year is the highest number or percentage reported in the 5-year period in that column % HBD or Drug Note: Had-Been-Drinking (HBD)

13 2016 - s Worn Among Vehicle and Passengers by Vehicle Type Vehicle Type Passenger car, SUV, van Occupants ities A - Suspected Serious B - Suspected Minor C - Possible Injury No Injury % % % % % 272 253 93.0 1 1 100.0 0 0 0.0 4 2 50.0 12 12 100.0 252 238 94.4 Motor home 10 10 100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 10 10 100.0 Pickup truck 118 114 96.6 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 2 2 100.0 4 4 100.0 109 108 99.1 % Small truck under 10,000 lbs. GVWR 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 Motorcycle 6 0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 4 0 0.0 Moped / goped 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 Go-cart / golf cart 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 Snowmobile 4 3 75.0 0 0 0.0 2 1 50.0 0 0 0.0 1 1 100.0 1 1 100.0 Off-Road Vehicle - ORV / All-Terrain Vehicle - ATV 2 2 100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 1 100.0 1 1 100.0 0 0 0.0 Other 4 3 75.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 1 100.0 3 2 66.7 Truck/bus over 10,000 lbs. 8 5 62.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 2 1 50.0 0 0 0.0 6 4 66.7 Unknown 1 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 425 390 91.8 2 1 0.0 2 1 50.0 10 6 60.0 19 19 100.0 385 363 94.3 Note: Use includes shoulder belt only used, lap belt only used, both lap and shoulder belts used, child restraint used, restraint failure, and helmet worn. 2016 - s Worn Among Vehicle and Passengers by Age Age Group Occupants ities A - Suspected Serious B - Suspected Minor C - Possible Injury No Injury % % % % % 0-15 5 4 80.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 2 1 50.0 2 2 100.0 1 1 100.0 16-20 44 41 93.2 1 1 100.0 0 0 0.0 2 1 50.0 3 3 100.0 38 36 94.7 21-24 25 25 100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 2 2 100.0 23 23 100.0 25-64 285 265 93.0 1 0 0.0 2 1 50.0 5 3 60.0 8 8 100.0 269 253 94.1 65 + 59 55 93.2 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 1 100.0 4 4 100.0 54 50 92.6 Unknown 7 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 425 390 91.8 2 1 0.0 2 1 50.0 10 6 60.0 19 19 100.0 385 363 94.3 Note: Use includes shoulder belt only used, lap belt only used, both lap and shoulder belts used, child restraint used, restraint failure, and helmet worn. %

14 5-Year Trend - Use Among Use No belts available 4 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 Shoulder belt only used 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 0 1 Lap belt only used 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Both lap & shoulder belts used 315 0 15 357 0 31 327 1 14 321 0 19 369 1 17 No belts used 0 0 0 5 2 1 3 0 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 Child restraint used 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Child restraint not used, unavailable or improper use 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 failure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 use unknown 3 0 1 2 1 0 12 0 1 28 0 1 19 0 2 Helmet worn 5 0 4 6 0 3 10 0 7 7 0 6 5 0 4 Helmet not worn 3 0 3 3 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 Helmet use unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 6 1 2 Uncoded & errors 4 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 334 0 25 379 4 37 363 1 26 369 0 28 420 2 26 5-Year Trend - Use Among Coded Drinking Use No belts available 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shoulder belt only used 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lap belt only used 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Both lap & shoulder belts used 9 0 3 5 0 1 4 1 0 5 0 2 5 1 0 No belts used 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Child restraint used 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Child restraint not used, unavailable or improper use 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 failure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 use unknown 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 Helmet worn 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Helmet not worn 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Helmet use unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Uncoded & errors 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 4 7 1 1 6 1 1 6 0 2 9 2 2

15 5-Year Trend - Seatbelt Not Among by Age Age Group 0-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 21-24 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25-64 2 0 1 3 1 1 3 0 1 4 0 0 3 0 0 65 + 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 6 2 2 5 0 2 6 0 1 5 0 0 Note: Seatbelt Not includes no belts available or no belts used. 0-15 16-20 21-24 25-64 65 + Unknown 2012 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 2013 0 0 3 3 0 0 6 2014 0 0 1 3 1 0 5 2015 0 1 0 4 1 0 6 2016 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 Average 0 0 1 3 1 0 5

16 5-Year Trend - Seatbelt Among by Age Age Group 0-15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 16-20 28 0 1 28 0 5 28 0 1 36 0 4 38 1 1 21-24 18 0 2 25 0 1 18 0 0 23 0 5 25 0 2 25-64 224 0 9 247 0 20 230 0 10 207 0 9 263 0 10 65 + 45 0 3 57 0 5 52 1 3 56 0 1 55 0 5 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 315 0 15 358 0 31 328 1 14 323 0 19 381 1 18 Note: Seatbelt includes shoulder belt only used, lap belt only used, both lap and shoulder belts used, and restraint failure. 0-15 16-20 21-24 25-64 65 + Unknown 2012 0 28 18 224 45 0 315 2013 1 28 25 247 57 0 358 2014 0 28 18 230 52 0 328 2015 1 36 23 207 56 0 323 2016 0 38 25 263 55 0 381 Average 0 32 22 234 53 0 341

17 5-Year Trend - in by Hazardous Action Hazardous Action in in in in in in in in in in None 261 0 305 2 256 1 267 0 311 2 Speed too fast 32 0 30 1 39 0 24 0 45 1 Speed too slow 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Failed to yield 9 0 16 0 10 0 24 0 14 0 Disregard traffic control 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 Drove wrong way 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Drove left of center 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 Improper passing 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Improper lane use 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Improper turn 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 4 1 Improper/no signal 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Improper backing 4 0 2 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 Unable to stop in assured clear distance 6 0 4 0 7 0 8 0 12 0 Other 9 0 6 1 14 0 9 0 16 0 Unknown 3 0 6 1 23 0 10 0 6 0 Reckless driving 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Careless/negligent driving 1 0 3 0 4 0 17 0 6 0 Uncoded & errors 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 334 1 379 5 363 2 369 0 420 4

18 The picture above represents all 2016 alcohol-involved fatal crashes in Montmorency County. In 2016, there were 9 alcohol-involved crashes in Montmorency County: 2 K - 0 A - Suspected Serious Injury 1 B - Suspected Minor Injury 1 C - Possible Injury 5 O - Property Damage Only/No Injury

Office of Highway Safety Planning Physical Address: 7150 Harris Drive Dimondale, Michigan 48821 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 30634 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Phone: (517) 284-3112 Fax: (517) 284-3151 Find us on the web: MichiganTrafficCrashFacts.org