Research Article Some Inclusion Relationships of Certain Subclasses of p-valent Functions Associated with a Family of Integral Operators

Similar documents
Research Article Certain Subclasses of Multivalent Functions Defined by Higher-Order Derivative

Research Article A New Class of Meromorphically Analytic Functions with Applications to the Generalized Hypergeometric Functions

Research Article Sufficient Conditions for λ-spirallike and λ-robertson Functions of Complex Order

Research Article Properties of Certain Subclass of Multivalent Functions with Negative Coefficients

Research Article A Study of Cho-Kwon-Srivastava Operator with Applications to Generalized Hypergeometric Functions

Research Article Arc Length Inequality for a Certain Class of Analytic Functions Related to Conic Regions

Research Article A Study on Becker s Univalence Criteria

Majorization Properties for Subclass of Analytic p-valent Functions Defined by the Generalized Hypergeometric Function

Research Article Coefficient Inequalities for a Subclass of p-valent Analytic Functions

Research Article A New Class of Meromorphic Functions Associated with Spirallike Functions

Research Article Coefficient Estimates for Two New Subclasses of Biunivalent Functions with respect to Symmetric Points

Research Article Applications of Differential Subordination for Argument Estimates of Multivalent Analytic Functions

Research Article A New Roper-Suffridge Extension Operator on a Reinhardt Domain

SOME APPLICATIONS OF SALAGEAN INTEGRAL OPERATOR. Let A denote the class of functions of the form: f(z) = z + a k z k (1.1)

Convolution properties for subclasses of meromorphic univalent functions of complex order. Teodor Bulboacă, Mohamed K. Aouf, Rabha M.

Research Article A Subclass of Analytic Functions Related to k-uniformly Convex and Starlike Functions

SOME SUBCLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR. Maslina Darus and Imran Faisal

Research Article On an Integral Transform of a Class of Analytic Functions

Research Article On Generalized Bazilevic Functions Related with Conic Regions

Research Article Subordination and Superordination on Schwarzian Derivatives

Research Article A Third-Order Differential Equation and Starlikeness of a Double Integral Operator

Research Article Differential Subordinations of Arithmetic and Geometric Means of Some Functionals Related to a Sector

On a New Subclass of Meromorphically Multivalent Functions Defined by Linear Operator

Research Article New Classes of Analytic Functions Involving Generalized Noor Integral Operator

A Certain Subclass of Multivalent Functions Involving Higher-Order Derivatives

Some basic properties of certain subclasses of meromorphically starlike functions

Research Article Some Subordination Results on q-analogue of Ruscheweyh Differential Operator

Inclusion relationships for certain classes of analytic functions involving the Choi-Saigo-Srivastava operator

Research Article Subordination Results on Subclasses Concerning Sakaguchi Functions

Research Article Coefficient Conditions for Harmonic Close-to-Convex Functions

Research Article Integral Means Inequalities for Fractional Derivatives of a Unified Subclass of Prestarlike Functions with Negative Coefficients

A NEW CLASS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS RELATED TO CHO-KWON-SRIVASTAVA OPERATOR. F. Ghanim and M. Darus. 1. Introduction

On subclasses of n-p-valent prestarlike functions of order beta and type gamma Author(s): [ 1 ] [ 1 ] [ 1 ] Address Abstract KeyWords

The Noor Integral and Strongly Starlike Functions

Differential Subordination and Superordination Results for Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions by the Technique of Admissible Functions

SUBCLASS OF HARMONIC STARLIKE FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH SALAGEAN DERIVATIVE

Subclass of Meromorphic Functions with Positive Coefficients Defined by Frasin and Darus Operator

Fekete-Szegö Inequality for Certain Classes of Analytic Functions Associated with Srivastava-Attiya Integral Operator

A New Subclasses of Meromorphic p-valent Functions with Positive Coefficient Defined by Fractional Calculus Operators

Research Article Some Starlikeness Criterions for Analytic Functions

Some Further Properties for Analytic Functions. with Varying Argument Defined by. Hadamard Products

Subclasses of Analytic Functions. Involving the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta Function

MULTIVALENTLY MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH CONVOLUTION STRUCTURE. Kaliyapan Vijaya, Gangadharan Murugusundaramoorthy and Perumal Kathiravan

On Quasi-Hadamard Product of Certain Classes of Analytic Functions

Rosihan M. Ali, M. Hussain Khan, V. Ravichandran, and K. G. Subramanian. Let A(p, m) be the class of all p-valent analytic functions f(z) = z p +

The Relationships Between p valent Functions and Univalent Functions

QuasiHadamardProductofCertainStarlikeandConvexFunctions

Research Article A Subclass of Harmonic Univalent Functions Associated with q-analogue of Dziok-Srivastava Operator

Research Article Some Properties of Certain Integral Operators on New Subclasses of Analytic Functions with Complex Order

Research Article Circle-Uniqueness of Pythagorean Orthogonality in Normed Linear Spaces

STRONG DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATION AND SUPERORDINATION OF NEW GENERALIZED DERIVATIVE OPERATOR. Anessa Oshah and Maslina Darus

An Application of Wilf's Subordinating Factor Sequence on Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions

On a class of analytic functions related to Hadamard products

j(z) > + FZ f(z) z + oz f(z) 1-.F < 1-.F zf (z) } 1 E (z 6 U,F 1). (1.3) >/(z e u) ANGULAR ESTIMATIONS OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS

The Order of Starlikeness of New p-valent Meromorphic Functions

ON A DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATION AND SUPERORDINATION OF NEW CLASS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

On certain subclasses of analytic functions

Research Article Hyperbolically Bi-Lipschitz Continuity for 1/ w 2 -Harmonic Quasiconformal Mappings

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

SUBCLASSES OF P-VALENT STARLIKE FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY USING CERTAIN FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE OPERATOR

Majorization for Certain Classes of Meromorphic Functions Defined by Integral Operator

Coecient bounds for certain subclasses of analytic functions of complex order

Differential Operator of a Class of Meromorphic Univalent Functions With Negative Coefficients

Correspondence should be addressed to Serap Bulut;

GENERALIZATIONS OF STRONGLY STARLIKE FUNCTIONS. Jacek Dziok 1. INTRODUCTION. a n z n (z U). dm (t) k. dm (t) =2,

Research Article Uniqueness Theorems of Difference Operator on Entire Functions

Convolution and Subordination Properties of Analytic Functions with Bounded Radius Rotations

On Certain Class of Meromorphically Multivalent Reciprocal Starlike Functions Associated with the Liu-Srivastava Operator Defined by Subordination

Certain classes of p-valent analytic functions with negative coefficients and (λ, p)-starlike with respect to certain points

DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATION AND SUPERORDINATION OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY THE MULTIPLIER TRANSFORMATION

On the improvement of Mocanu s conditions

A NEW SUBCLASS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTION WITH POSITIVE COEFFICIENTS

Meromorphic parabolic starlike functions with a fixed point involving Srivastava-Attiya operator

Research Article A New Subclass of Analytic Functions Defined by Generalized Ruscheweyh Differential Operator

SOME CRITERIA FOR STRONGLY STARLIKE MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS

Differential Sandwich Theorem for Multivalent Meromorphic Functions associated with the Liu-Srivastava Operator

Research Article Remarks on Asymptotic Centers and Fixed Points

FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE COEFFICIENTS

ORDER. 1. INTRODUCTION Let A denote the class of functions of the form

Research Article Some New Generalized Integral Inequalities for GA-s-Convex Functions via Hadamard Fractional Integrals

Research Article Strong Convergence of Parallel Iterative Algorithm with Mean Errors for Two Finite Families of Ćirić Quasi-Contractive Operators

Research Article Some Monotonicity Properties of Gamma and q-gamma Functions

Research Article Unicity of Entire Functions concerning Shifts and Difference Operators

Subclass Of K Uniformly Starlike Functions Associated With Wright Generalized Hypergeometric Functions

Results regarding the argument of certain p-valent analytic functions defined by a generalized integral operator

QuasiHadamardProductofCertainStarlikeandConvexPValentFunctions

On Multivalent Functions Associated with Fixed Second Coefficient and the Principle of Subordination

On Starlike and Convex Functions with Respect to 2k-Symmetric Conjugate Points

Research Article On a New Class of p-valent Meromorphic Functions Defined in Conic Domains

Research Article Applying GG-Convex Function to Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities Involving Hadamard Fractional Integrals

Differential Subordination and Superordination for Multivalent Functions Involving a Generalized Differential Operator

On neighborhoods of functions associated with conic domains

New Results in the Theory of Differential Subordinations and Superordinations

Research Article Some New Explicit Values of Quotients of Ramanujan s Theta Functions and Continued Fractions

Inclusion and argument properties for certain subclasses of multivalent functions defined by the Dziok-Srivastava operator

Research Article Remarks on the Regularity Criterion of the Navier-Stokes Equations with Nonlinear Damping

Research Article Translative Packing of Unit Squares into Squares

DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATION RESULTS FOR NEW CLASSES OF THE FAMILY E(Φ, Ψ)

Subordination and Superordination Results for Analytic Functions Associated With Convolution Structure

Some properties for α-starlike functions with respect to k-symmetric points of complex order

Transcription:

ISRN Mathematical Analysis Volume 2013, Article ID 384170, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/384170 Research Article Some Inclusion Relationships of Certain Subclasses of p-valent Functions Associated with a Family of Integral Operators M. K. Aouf, 1 R. M. El-Ashwah, 2 and Ahmed M. Abd-Eltawab 3 1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt 2 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, New Damietta 34517, Egypt 3 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Fayoum University, Fayoum 63514, Egypt Correspondence should be addressed to Ahmed M. Abd-Eltawab; ams03@fayoum.edu.eg Received 16 June 2013; Accepted 24 August 2013 Academic Editors: G. Gripenberg and B. Wang Copyright 2013 M. K. Aouf et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. By making use of the new integral operator, we introduce and investigate several new subclasses of p-valent starlike, p-valent convex, p-valent close-to-convex, and p-valent quasi-convex functions. In particular, we establish some inclusion relationships associated with the aforementioned integral operators. Some of the results established in this paper would provide extensions of those given in earlier works. 1. Introduction Let A(p) denotetheclassoffunctionsoftheform f (z) =z p + a k+p z k+p (p N = 1, 2, 3,...), (1) which are analytic and p-valent in the unit disc U=z:z C,and z < 1 and let A(1) = A. Afunctionf A(p)is said to be in the class S p (λ) of p-valent starlike functions of order λ in U if and only if Re ( zf (z) )>λ (z U; 0 λ<p). (2) f (z) The class S p (λ) was introduced by Patil and Thakare [1]. Owa [2]introducedtheclassK p (λ) of p-valent convex of order λ in U if and only if Re (1 + zf (z) f )>λ (z U; 0 λ<p). (3) (z) It is easy to observe from (2)and(3)that f (z) K p (λ) zf (z) p S p (λ). (4) We denote by S p = S p (0) and K p = K p (0) where S p and K p are the classes of p-valently starlike functions and pvalently convex functions, respectively, (see Goodman [3]). For a function f A(p),wesaythatf C p if there exists a function g S p (λ) such that Re ( zf (z) ) >η (z U; 0 λ,η<p). (5) Functions in the class C p are called p-valent close-toconvex functions of order η and type λ. TheclassC p was studied by Aouf [4] andtheclassc 1 was studied by Libera [5]. Noor [6, 7] introducedandstudiedtheclassesc p and C 1 as follows. Afunctionf A(p)is said to be in the class C p of quasi-convex functions of order η and type λ if there exists a function g K p (λ) such that Re (zf (z)) g (z) >η (z U; 0 λ, η<p). (6)

2 ISRN Mathematical Analysis It follows from (5)and(6)that f (z) C p zf (z) C p p. (7) For functions f A(p)given by (1) andg A(p)given by =z p + b k+p z k+p (p N), (8) the Hadamard product (or convolution) of f and g is given by (f g) (z) =z p + a k+p b k+p z k+p =(g f)(z). (9) For the function f A(p),weintroducedtheoperator : A(p) A(p) as follows: (α γ + 1) f (z) =(p+α+β γ) p+β 1 z β z (1 t 0 z )α γ t β 1 f (t) dt = Γ(p+α+β γ+1) 1 Γ(p+β)Γ(α γ+1) z β z (1 t 0 z )α γ t β 1 f (t) dt =z p + Γ(p+α+β γ+1) Γ(p+β) Γ(β+p+k) [ Γ(α+β+p+k γ+1) ]a k+pz k+p (β > p; α γ 1; γ > 0; p N; z U). (10) From (10), it is easy to verify that where the operator Q α was introduced and studied by Liu and Owa [8], and Q α β,1 = Qα β,wheretheoperatorqα β was introduced and studied by Jung et al. [9]; (ii) For α=γ=1and β=c, R 1,1 c,p f (z) =J c,p (z) = p+c z c =z p + z t c 1 f (t) dt 0 ( c+p c+k+p )a k+pz k+p (c > p; p N; z U), (13) where J c,p (z) is the familiar integral operator, which was defined by Cho and Kim [10]. The operator J c,1 (z) = J c (z) was introduced by Bernardi [11] and we note that J 1,1 (z) = J(z) was introduced and studied by Libera [12] andlivingston [13]. The main object of this paper is to investigate the various inclusion relationships for each of the following subclasses of thenormalizedanalyticfunctionclassa(p) which are defined here by means of the operator given by (10). Definition 2. In conjunction with (2)and(10), S α,β,γ,p (λ) =f:f A(p),Rα,γ f S p (λ), 0 λ<p,p N. Definition 3. In conjunction with (3)and(10), (14) =(α+β+p γ+1) f (z) (α+β γ+1) f (z). (11) Remark 1. Consider (i) For γ=1, R α,1 f (z) =Qα f (z) =( p+α+β 1 p+β 1 ) α z z (1 t β z )α 1 t β 1 f (t) dt = Γ(p+α+β) z 1 Γ(p+β)Γ(α) z (1 t β z )α 1 t β 1 f (t) dt =z p + Γ(p+α+β) Γ(p+β) 0 [ Γ(β+p+k) Γ(α+β+p+k) ]a k+pz k+p (β > p; α 0; p N; z U), 0 (12) K α,β,γ,p (λ) =f:f A(p), f K p (λ), 0 λ<p,p N. Definition 4. In conjunction with (5)and(10), C α,β,γ,p = f : f A (p), f C p, 0 λ,η<p,p N. Definition 5. In conjunction with (6)and(10), C α,β,γ,p = f : f A (p), Rα,γ f C p, 0 λ,η<p,p N. (15) (16) (17)

ISRN Mathematical Analysis 3 Remark 6. Consider (I) For γ=1, in the above definitions, we have S α,β,1,p (λ) =S α, (λ) =f:f A(p),Q α f S p (λ), K α,β,1,p (λ) =K α, (λ) 0 λ<p,p N, =f:f A(p),Q α f K p (λ), (III) For γ=p=1,intheabovedefinitions,wehave S α,β,1,1 (λ) =S α,β (λ) K α,β,1,1 (λ) =K α,β (λ) C α,β,1,1 = C α,β =f:f A,Q α β f S (λ),0 λ<1, =f:f A,Q α βf K(λ),0 λ<1, =f:f A,Q α β f C(η,λ),0 λ,η<1, 0 λ<p,p N, C α,β,1,p = C α, =f:f A(p),Q α f C p, (18) C α,β,1,1 = C α,β =f:f A,Q α β f C, 0 λ, η < 1, (20) 0 λ,η<p,p N, C α,β,1,p = C α, =f:f A(p),Q α f C p, 0 λ,η<p,p N. (II) For α=γ=1and β=c(c> p),intheabove definitions, we have S 1,c,1,p (λ) =S c,p (λ) K 1,c,1,p (λ) =K c,p (λ) =f:f A(p),J c,p f (z) S p (λ), 0 λ<p,p N, =f:f A(p),J c,p f (z) K p (λ), where the classes S α,β (λ), K α,β(λ), C α,β, andc α,β were introduced and studied by Gao et al. [14]. In order to establish our main results, we need the followinglemmaduetomillerandmocanu[15]. Lemma 7 (see [15]). Let Θ be a complex-valued function such that Θ:D C, D C C (C is the complex plane), (21) and let u=u 1 +iu 2, V = V 1 +iv 2.SupposethatΘ(u, V) satisfies the following conditions: Let (i) Θ(u, V) is continuous in D; (ii) (1, 0) D and ReΘ(1, 0) > 0; (iii) ReΘ(iu 2, V 1 ) 0 for all (iu 2, V 1 ) Dsuch that V 1 (1/2)(1 + u 2 2 ). q (z) =1+q 1 z+q 2 z 2 + (22) C 1,c,1,p = C c,p C 1,c,1,p = C c,p 0 λ<p,p N, =f:f A(p),J c,p f (z) C p, 0 λ,η<p,p N, =f:f A(p),J c,p f (z) C p, 0 λ,η<p,p N. (19) be analytic in U such that (q(z), z q (z)) D for all z U.If then Re Θ (q (z),z q (z))>0 (z U), (23) 2. The Main Results Re q (z) >0 (z U). (24) In this section, we give several inclusion relationships for analytic function classes, which are associated with the integral operator. Unless otherwise mentioned, we assume throughout this paper that β> p, α γ 1, γ>0, p N, and z U.

4 ISRN Mathematical Analysis Theorem 8. Let 0 λ<p.then Proof. Let f S α,β,γ,p (λ) and set S α,β,γ,p (λ) S α+1,β,γ,p (λ). (25) f(z)) f (z) λ = (p λ) q (z), (26) whereq(z) is given by (22).By usingidentity (11), we obtain f (z) λ+(p λ)q(z) +(α+β γ+1) =. (27) f (z) α+β+p γ+1 Differentiating (27) logarithmicallywithrespecttoz, we obtain z( f (z) = f (z) + = λ + (p λ) q (z) + (p λ) zq (z) (p λ) q (z) +λ+α+β γ+1 (p λ) zq (z) (p λ) q (z) +λ+α+β γ+1. (28) We now choose u=q(z)=u 1 +iu 2 and V =zq (z) = V 1 +iv 2, and define the function Θ by (p λ) V Θ (u, V) =(p λ)u+ (p λ)u+λ+α+β γ+1. (29) Then, clearly Θ(u,V) satisfies the following conditions: (i) Θ(u, V) is continuous in D=(C \(λ+α+β γ+ 1)/(λ p)) C; (ii) (1, 0) D and ReΘ(1, 0) = p λ > 0; (iii) for all (iu 2, V 1 ) Dsuch that V 1 (1/2)(1 + u 2 2 ) we have (p λ) V Re Θ (iu 2, V 1 ) = Re 1 (p λ) iu 2 +λ+α+β γ+1 (p λ) (λ + α + β γ + 1) V = 1 (p λ) 2 u2 2 +(λ+α+β γ+1)2 (p λ) (1 + u2 2 )(λ+α+β γ+1) 2[(p λ) 2 u 2 2 +(λ+α+β γ+1)2 ] <0, (30) which shows that the function Θ satisfies the hypotheses of Lemma 7. Consequently, we easily obtain the inclusion relationship (25). Theorem 9. Let 0 λ<p, p N.Then K α,β,γ,p (λ) K α+1,β,γ,p (λ). (31) Proof. Let f K α,β,γ,p (λ).then,fromdefinition 3,wehave f K p (λ), (0 λ<p; p N). (32) Furthermore, in view of the relationship (4), we find that that is, that z p (Rα,γ S p (λ), (33) (z) (zf p ) S p (λ). (34) Thus, by using Definition 2 and Theorem 8,wehave zf (z) p which implies that S p (α,β,γ,λ) S p (α+1,β,γ,λ), (35) K α,β,γ,p (λ) K α+1,β,γ,p (λ). (36) The proof of Theorem 9 is thus completed. Theorem 10. Let 0 λ, η<p.then C α,β,γ,p C α+1,β,γ,p. (37) Proof. Let f C α,β,γ,p. Then there exists a function Ψ S p (λ) such that Re We put z( Ψ (z) so that we have g S α,β,γ,p We next put (λ), Re >η (0 λ,η<p,z U). (38) =Ψ(z), (39) z( >η (z U). (40) =η+(p η)q(z), (41)

ISRN Mathematical Analysis 5 where q(z) is given by (22). Thus, by using identity (11), we obtain z( = (zf (z)) =(z[ (zf (z))] =( +(α+β γ+1) (zf (z))) (z[ ] ( +(α+β γ+1) 1 ) z[ (zf (z))] +(α+β γ+1) Rα+1,γ (zf (z)) ) z[ ] +(α+β γ+1)) 1. (42) Since g S α,β,γ,p (λ), thenfromtheorem 8 we have g S α+1,β,γ,p (λ),sothatwecanput where Then z( =( z[ ] = λ + (p λ) G (z), (43) G (z) =g 1 (x, y) + ig 2 (x, y), Re (G (z)) =g 1 (x, y) > 0 (z U). z[ (zf (z))] (44) +(α+β γ+1)(η+(p η)q(z))) ((p λ)g(z) +λ+α+β γ+1) 1. (45) We thus find from (41)that = [η+(p η)q(z)]. (46) Differentiating both sides of (46)withrespecttoz,weobtain z[ ] =(p η)zq (z) + =(p η)zq (z) z[ ] [η + (p η) q (z)] +[λ+(p λ)g(z)][η+(p η)q(z)]. By substituting (47)into(45), we have z( η=(p η)q(z) + (47) (p η) zq (z) (p λ) G (z) +λ+α+β γ+1. (48) The remainder of our proof of Theorem 10 is much akin to that of Theorem 8. We, therefore, choose to omit the details involved. Theorem 11. Let 0 λ, η<p.then C α,β,γ,p C α+1,β,γ,p. (49) Proof. Just as we derived Theorem 9 as a consequence of Theorem 8 by using the equivalence (4), we can also prove Theorem 11 by using Theorem 10 in conjunction with the equivalence (7). Our main results in Theorems 8 11, canthusbeapplied with a view to deducing the following corollaries. Taking γ = 1 in Theorems 8 11 above, we obtain the following corollary. Corollary 12. Let 0 λ, η<p.then S α, (λ) S α+1, (λ), K α, (λ) K α+1, (λ), C α, C α+1,, C α, C α+1,. (50) Remark 13. Taking p = 1 in Corollary 12, weobtainthe results obtained by Gao et al. [14,Theorems1-4]. Taking α=γ=1and β=c(c> p)in Theorems 8 11, we obtain the following corollary.

6 ISRN Mathematical Analysis Corollary 14. Let 0 λ, η<p.then S 1,c,p (λ) S 2,c,p (λ), K 1,c,p (λ) K 2,c,p (λ), C 1,c,p C 2,c,p, C 1,c,p C 2,c,p. (51) Remark 15. Taking p = 1 in Corollary 14, weobtainthe results obtained by Gao et al. [14,Corollary1 4]. 3. A Set of Integral-Preserving Properties In this section, we present several integral-preserving properties of the analytic function classes introduced here. In order to obtain the integral-preserving properties involving the integral operator J c,p defined by (13). Theorem 16. Let c be any real number and c> p.iff(z) S α,β,γ,p (λ), thenj c,p(z) S α,β,γ,p (λ), wherej c,pf(z) is defined by (13). Proof. From (13), we have z( J c,p (z)) =(c+p) crα,γ J c,p (z). (52) Let f S α,β,γ,p (λ) and set z( J c,pf (z)) λ = (p λ) q (z), (53) J c,pf (z) whereq(z) is given by (22).By usingidentity (52), we obtain f (z) J c,pf (z) λ+(p λ)q(z) +c =. (54) c+p Differentiating (54) logarithmicallywithrespecttoz, we obtain z( f(z)) f (z) = z( J c,pf(z)) + J c,pf (z) (p λ) zq (z) (p λ) q (z) +λ+c = λ + (p λ) q (z) + (p λ) zq (z) (p λ) q (z) +λ+c. (55) We now choose u=q(z)=u 1 +iu 2,andV =zq (z) = V 1 +iv 2, and define the function Θ by (p λ) V Θ (u, V) =(p λ)u+ (p λ)u+λ+c. (56) It is easy to see that the function Θ(u, V) satisfies the conditions of Lemma 7, and the remaining part of the proof of Theorem 16 is similar to that of Theorem 8. Taking γ = 1 in Theorem 16, we obtain the following corollary. Corollary 17. Let c be any real number and c> p.iff(z) S α, (λ),thenj c,p(z) S α, (λ),wherej c,pf(z) is defined by (13). Theorem 18. Let c be any real number and c> p.iff(z) K α,β,γ,p (λ),thenj c,p (z) K α,β,γ,p (λ),wherej c,p f(z) is defined by (13). Proof. By applying Theorem 16 in conjunction with the equivalence (4), it follows that f (z) K α,β,γ,p (λ) which proves Theorem 18. z p f (z) S α,β,γ,p (λ) J c,p ( z p f (z)) S α,β,γ,p (λ) z p (J c,pf (z)) S α,β,γ,p (λ) J c,p f (z) K α,β,γ,p (λ), (57) Taking γ = 1 in Theorem 18, we obtain the following corollary. Corollary 19. Let c be any real number and c> p.iff(z) K α, (λ),thenj c,p (z) K α, (λ),wherej c,p f(z) is defined by (13). Theorem 20. Let c be any real number and c> p.iff(z) C α,β,γ,p, thenj c,p (z) C α,β,γ,p, wherej c,p f(z) is defined by (13). Proof. Let f C α,β,γ,p. Then there exists a function Ψ S p (λ) such that Re We put z( Ψ (z) so that we have g S α,β,γ,p We next put (λ), Re z( J c,pf (z)) J c,p >η (0 λ,η<p,z U). (58) =Ψ(z), (59) z( >η (z U). (60) =η+(p η)q(z), (61)

ISRN Mathematical Analysis 7 where q(z) is given by (22). Thus, by using identity (52), we obtain z( J c,pf (z)) J c,p = (z(j c,pf (z)) ) J c,p =(z[ (z(j c,pf (z)) )] +c (z(j c,pf (z)) )) (z[ J c,p] Differentiating both sides of (66)withrespecttoz,weobtain z[z( J c,pf (z)) ] J c,p =(p η)zq (z) + z[ J c,p] J c,p =(p η)zq (z) [η+(p η)q(z)] (67) +c 1 J c,p ) z[ (z(j c,pf (z)) )] =( J c,p (z(j c,pf (z)) ) +c J ) c,p z[ J c,p] 1 ( J +c). c,p (62) +[λ+(p λ)g(z)][η+(p η)q(z)]. By substituting (67)into(65), we have z( (p η) zq (z) η=(p η)q(z) + (p λ) G (z) +λ+c. (68) The remainder of our proof of Theorem 20 is much akin to that of Theorem 8. We, therefore, choose to omit the details involved. Taking γ = 1 in Theorem 20, we obtain the following corollary. Since g S α,β,γ,p (λ), then from Theorem 16 we have J c,p g(z) S α,β,γ,p (λ),sothatwecanput where z[ J c,p] J c,p = λ + (p λ) G (z), (63) G (z) =g 1 (x, y) + ig 2 (x, y), Re (G (z)) =g 1 (x, y) > 0 Then z( J c,pf (z)) J c,p We thus find from (61)that z[ (z(j c,pf (z)) )] =( J c,p +c(η+(p η)q(z))) ((p λ)g(z) +λ+c) 1. (z U). (64) (65) z( J c,pf (z)) = J c,p [η + (p η) q (z)]. (66) Corollary 21. Let c be any real number and c > p.if f(z) C α,,thenj c,p (z) C α,,wherej c,p f(z) is defined by (13). Theorem 22. Let c be any real number and c> p.iff(z) C α,β,γ,p, thenj c,p(z) C α,β,γ,p, wherej c,pf(z) is defined by (13). Proof. Just as we derived Theorem 18 as a consequence of Theorem 16 by using the equivalence (4), we can also prove Theorem 22 by using Theorem 20 in conjunction with the equivalence (7). Taking γ = 1 in Theorem 22, we obtain the following corollary. Corollary 23. Let c be any real number and c> p.iff(z) C α,β,γ,p, thenj c,p(z) C α,β,γ,p, wherej c,pf(z) is defined by (13). References [1] D. A. Patil and N. K. Thakare, On convex hulls and extreme points of p-valent starlike and convex classes with applications, Bulletin Mathématique de la Société des Sciences Mathématiques de la République Socialiste de Roumanie,vol.27,no.75,pp.145 160, 1983. [2] S.Owa, Oncertain classes ofp-valent functions with negative coefficients, Simon Stevin. A Quarterly Pure and Applied Mathematics,vol.59,no.4,pp.385 402,1985.

8 ISRN Mathematical Analysis [3] A. W. Goodman, On the Schwarz-Christoffel transformation and p-valent functions, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society,vol.68,pp.204 223,1950. [4] M. K. Aouf, On a class of p-valent close-to-convex functions of order β and type α, International Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 259 266, 1988. [5] R. J. Libera, Some radius of convexity problems, Duke Mathematical Journal,vol.31,pp.143 158,1964. [6] K. I. Noor, On quasi-convex functions and related topics, International Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences,vol.10,no.2,pp.241 258,1987. [7] K. I. Noor, On some applications of the Ruscheweyh derivatives, Mathematica Japonica,vol.36,no.5,pp.869 874,1991. [8] J.-L. Liu and S. Owa, Properties of certain integral operator, International Mathematical Sciences,vol.3,no.1,pp. 69 75, 2004. [9] I.B.Jung,Y.C.Kim,andH.M.Srivastava, TheHardyspace of analytic functions associated with certain one-parameter families of integral operators, Mathematical Analysis and Applications,vol.176,no.1,pp.138 147,1993. [10] N. E. Cho and T. H. Kim, Multiplier transformations and strongly close-to-convex functions, Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 399 410, 2003. [11] S. D. Bernardi, Convex and starlike univalent functions, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society,vol.135,pp. 429 446, 1969. [12] R. J. Libera, Some classes of regular univalent functions, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol.16,pp. 755 758, 1965. [13] A. E. Livingston, On the radius of univalence of certain analytic functions, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 17, pp. 352 357, 1966. [14] C.-Y. Gao, S.-M. Yuan, and H. M. Srivastava, Some functional inequalities and inclusion relationships associated with certain families of integral operators, Computational and Applied Mathematics,vol.49,no.11-12,pp.1787 1795,2005. [15] S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, Second-order differential inequalities in the complex plane, JournalofMathematical Analysis and Applications,vol.65,no.2,pp.289 305,1978.

Advances in Operations Research Advances in Decision Sciences Mathematical Problems in Engineering Algebra Probability and Statistics The Scientific World Journal International Differential Equations Submit your manuscripts at International Advances in Combinatorics Mathematical Physics Complex Analysis International Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Stochastic Analysis Abstract and Applied Analysis International Mathematics Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Discrete Mathematics Applied Mathematics Function Spaces Optimization