Firm-Level Mechanisms for Export Price Determination

Similar documents
Online Appendix: Entry into Export Markets

PubPol 201. Module 3: International Trade Policy. Class 4 Outline. Class 4 Outline. Class 4 China Shock

Gravity Equation. Seyed Ali Madanizadeh. April Sharif U. of Tech. Seyed Ali Madanizadeh (Sharif U. of Tech.) Gravity Equation April / 16

Gravity Models: Theoretical Foundations and related estimation issues

LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT

The gravity models for trade research

Sixty years later, is Kuznets still right? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa

Global Value Chain Participation and Current Account Imbalances

Identification of Discrete Choice Models Using Moment Inequalities: Theory and Application

Session 3-4: Estimating the gravity models

IS-LM Analysis. Math 202. Brian D. Fitzpatrick. Duke University. February 14, 2018 MATH

Seaport Status, Access, and Regional Development in Indonesia

Mankiw Chapter 11. Aggregate Demand I. Building the IS-LM Model

The Impact of Sanction on Bilateral Intra-Industry Trade between Iran and SCO Countries

Financial Factors in Economic Fluctuations. Lawrence Christiano Roberto Motto Massimo Rostagno

The Poisson Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimator: A Solution to the Adding Up Problem in Gravity Models

The Colonial Origins of French Trade Patterns

Global and China Sodium Silicate Industry 2014 Market Research Report

Natural Experiments of History and Credit Institutions

Exercises (in progress) Applied Econometrics Part 1

CROSS-COUNTRY DIFFERENCES IN PRODUCTIVITY: THE ROLE OF ALLOCATION AND SELECTION

Gravity and Extended Gravity: Estimating a Structural Model of Export Entry

OUTWARD FDI, DOMESTIC INVESTMENT AND INFORMAL INSTITUTIONS: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA WAQAR AMEER & MOHAMMED SAUD M ALOTAISH

Spatial Aspects of Trade Liberalization in Colombia: A General Equilibrium Approach. Eduardo Haddad Jaime Bonet Geoffrey Hewings Fernando Perobelli

Session 4-5: The benchmark of theoretical gravity models

Trade and institutions: extensive and intensive margins

ECON 5118 Macroeconomic Theory

Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Final Examination: Spring 2018

The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Agricultural and Food Trade

Dynamics of Firms and Trade in General Equilibrium. Robert Dekle, Hyeok Jeong and Nobuhiro Kiyotaki USC, Seoul National University and Princeton

On the Problem of Endogenous Unobserved Effects in the Estimation of Gravity Models

YANNICK LANG Visiting Student

Skilled Factor Abundance and Traded Goods Prices

Do Financial Factors Drive Aggregate Productivity? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Establishments

The TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam?

Location Patterns of Manufacturing Industries in Tunisia

CO INTEGRATION: APPLICATION TO THE ROLE OF INFRASTRUCTURES ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA

External Economies of Scale and Industrial Policy: A View from Trade

ARTNeT Interactive Gravity Modeling Tool

Monetary and Exchange Rate Policy Under Remittance Fluctuations. Technical Appendix and Additional Results

Regional Innovation Policy in Taiwan and South Korea: Impact of Science Parks on Firm-Productivity. Ian Sheldon

Panel data panel data set not

More information at

Annual Ministerial Meeting of Foreign Ministers of Landlocked Developing Countries

Import Protection as Export Destruction

WISE International Masters

Topic 4 Forecasting Exchange Rate

Trade policy III: Export subsidies

Trade costs in bilateral trade flows: Heterogeneity and zeroes in structural gravity models

Motivation Non-linear Rational Expectations The Permanent Income Hypothesis The Log of Gravity Non-linear IV Estimation Summary.

Problem Set 1: Tariffs and Quotas (Solutions) Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Economics of European Integration TA: Victor Troster Fall 2012

PhD/MA Econometrics Examination January 2012 PART A

Ninth ARTNeT Capacity Building Workshop for Trade Research "Trade Flows and Trade Policy Analysis"

Comprehensive Asian Development Plan: A Proposed framework

Export nancial support of Brazilian manufactured products: a microeconometric analysis

Regional cooperation: evidence from European cooperative innovation networks

Modelling Czech and Slovak labour markets: A DSGE model with labour frictions

Chinese Export Competition, Declining Exports and Adjustments at the Industry and Regional Level in Europe

Cross-Border Infrastructure Connectivity: Needs, Facts and Challenges

Income Inequality, Trade and Financial Openness

Q3) a) Explain the construction of np chart. b) Write a note on natural tolerance limits and specification limits.

Final Exam. You may not use calculators, notes, or aids of any kind.

1 The Basic RBC Model

Quality and Gravity in International Trade

Networks and International Trade: APractitioner sperspective

The OLS Estimation of a basic gravity model. Dr. Selim Raihan Executive Director, SANEM Professor, Department of Economics, University of Dhaka

Discussion Papers In Economics And Business

Nowcasting the Finnish economy with a large Bayesian vector autoregressive model

SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES FOR: THE LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST FOR COINTEGRATION RANKS IN THE I(2) MODEL

Exporting Spatial Externalities

Export Destinations and Input Prices. Appendix A

A Spatial Decomposition of Income Inequality in Chile

Internation1al Trade

BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS SECTORAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT MARKET PRICES (current prices) (US$M)

Dynare Class on Heathcote-Perri JME 2002

Big Data, Machine Learning, and Causal Inference

Structural change in a multi-sector model of the climate and the economy

Appendix to. The Agglomeration of Exporters by Destination

Growth. Growth Theory. Mark Huggett 1. 1 Georgetown. January 26, 2018

From Argentina to Zimbabwe: Where Should I Sell my Widgets?

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

MIRANDA SVANIDZE AND LINDE GÖTZ

Research Article GMM Estimator: An Application to Intraindustry Trade

High growth firms, firm dynamics and industrial variety - Regional evidence from Austria

News Shocks: Different Effects in Boom and Recession?

Final Exam Financial Data Analysis at the University of Freiburg (Winter Semester 2008/2009) Friday, November 14, 2008,

Import Protection as Export Destruction

τ σ 1 (n 3 + m) + (n 1 + n 2 )τ σ 1 n 1, n 2, n 3, m 0 In this equilibrium, (A.1)-(A.4) are all equalities. Solving (A.1)-(A.

Intermediate inputs and the export gravity equation

IV. On the theory and application of Gravity Models

The Role of the Most Favored Nation Principle of the GATT/WTO in the New Trade Model

Trade and Inequality: From Theory to Estimation

The Matching and Sorting of Exporting and Importing Firms: Theory and Evidence. Felipe Benguria 1. May Abstract

Equilibrium in Factors Market: Properties

Trade and Direct Investment across the Taiwan Strait

ON THE PRACTICE OF LAGGING VARIABLES TO AVOID SIMULTANEITY

International Trade Lecture 16: Gravity Models (Theory)

Geographical and Cultural Patterns in Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions

Applied Econometrics. Applied Econometrics Second edition. Dimitrios Asteriou and Stephen G. Hall

Motivation A Figure 1 Figure 2 Table 1 Table 2

Transcription:

Firm-Level Mechanisms for Export Price Determination Department of Economics Dr. Alexandre Skiba 1/10

Issue, Motivation, & Theories How do firms choose their prices and quality for their export destinations? Linder Hypothesis Shipping the good apples out Data aggregated to product-destination-level Theories on Firm Quality choices 1 Firm specific products 2 Firm specific quality 3 Destination specific quality 4 Relatively more product firms have larger market penetration 2/10

Data Sources Chilean transaction-level dataset for 2009 Unit Value: Free-on-board World Bank s World Development Indicators: GDP and GDP per Capita (GDPc) CEPII: Foreign Countries Distances Created Variables Firm Size Firm Type: Single vs Multi Firm s Product Quality: Low vs. High Manufactured Products 3/10

Models: Export Destination Characteristics Analysis log(unitvalue p,d,f ) = β 1 log(gdp d ) + β 2 log(gdpc d ) + β 3 log(distance d ) P + β 4 log(size f ) + α p Product p + ɛ p,d,f (1) p=1 p - product d - destination f - firm 4/10

Model Results: Export Destination Characteristic Analysis Model: log(unit Value) = Covariates + Product Dummies Covariates (1) Agg. (2) S,L (3) S,H (4) M,L (5) M,H log(gdp) log(gdpc) log(distance) log(firm Size) 0.0179 0.0528 + (0.0017) (0.0286) 0.07902 (0.0034) 0.0371 (0.0038) 0.1139 (0.0563) 0.0007 (0.0623) 0.0630 (0.0182) 0.0975 (0.0723) 0.1042 (0.1518) 0.0854 (0.1482) 0.0435 (0.0631) 0.0177 (0.0033) 0.0632 (0.0064) 0.0804 (0.0068) 0.0411 (0.0026) 0.0617 (0.0076) 0.0992 (0.0144) 0.0265 + (0.0159) 0.0485 (0.0071) Type N/A Single Single Multi Multi Quality N/A Low High Low High Firms 942 324 2,013 1,189 Destinations 137 54 45 114 97 Products 3372 568 243 2,521 1,413 Observations 19,796 2,144 545 83,313 25,672 Significance Level: < 0.001, < 0.01, < 0.05, + < 0.1 (1): Aggregated to product-destination level. (2): Single and low quality type firms. (3): Single and high quality type firms. (4): Multiple and low quality type firms. (5): Multiple and high quality type firms. 5/10

Model: Export Destination Likelihood Analysis Pr(Destination p,d,f ) = β 1 log(gdp d ) + β 2 log(gdpc d ) + β 3 log(distance d ) P + α p Product p + ɛ p,d,f (2) p=1 p - product d - destination f - firm 6/10

Model Results: Export Destination Likelihood Analysis Model: Pr(Destination) = Covariates + Product Dummies Covariates (1) All (2) S,L (3) S,H (4) M,L (5) M,H log(gdp) log(gdpc) 0.0152 (0.0004) log(distance) 0.0544 0.0119 (0.0017) 0.0110 0.0173 (0.0007) (0.0030) (0.0008) 0.0311 (0.0040) 0.0148 (0.0025) 0.0007 (0.0048) 0.0141 (0.0006) 0.0156 (0.0011) 0.01778 (0.0010) 0.0067 (0.0018) 0.0112 + 0.0583 0.0483 (0.0061) (0.0014) (0.0023) Type N/A Single Single Multi Multi Quality All Low High Low High Firms 4,893 942 324 2,013 1,189 Destinations 137 129 116 137 137 Products 3372 568 243 2,521 1,413 Observations 339,211 11,585 4,708 113,101 42,787 Significance Level: < 0.001, < 0.01, < 0.05, + < 0.1 (1): All firms. (2): Single and low quality type firms. (3): Single and high quality type firms. (4): Multiple and low quality type firms. (5): Multiple and high quality type firms. 7/10

Models: Firm Characteristic Analysis log(unitvalue p,d,f ) = β 1 log(gdp d ) + β 2 log(gdpc d ) + β 3 log(distance d ) +β 4 Single + β 5 log(gdp d ) Single f + β 6 log(gdpc d ) Single f P +β 7 log(distance d ) Single f + α pproduct p + ɛ p,d,f (1.s) p=1 Pr(Destination p,d,f ) = β 1 log(gdp d ) + β 2 log(gdpc d ) + β 3 log(distance d ) p - product d - destination f - firm +β 4 Single + β 5 log(gdp d ) Single f + β 6 log(gdpc d ) Single f P +β 7 log(distance d ) Single f + α pproduct p + ɛ p,d,f (2.s) p=1 8/10

Model Results: Firm Characteristic Analysis Covariates log(gdp) log(gdpc) log(distance) Single log(gdp)*single log(gdpc)*single (1) (2) log(unit Value) Pr(Destination) 0.0176 (0.0017) 0.0753 (0.0034) 0.036 (0.0038) 1.4039 (0.2227) 0.0297 (0.0142) 0.2555 (0.0278) log(distance)*single 0.0205 (0.0286) 0.0155 (0.0004) 0.0113 (0.0006) 0.0565 (0.0009) 0.2003 (0.0258) 0.0030 (0.0012) 0.0035 (0.0022) 0.0238 (0.0027) Firms 4,893 4,893 Destinations 137 137 Products 3,372 3,372 Observations 354,678 339,211 Model: (1): log(unit Values) = covariates + product dummies (2): Pr(Destination) = covariates + product dummies Significance Level: < 0.001, < 0.01, < 0.05, + < 0.1 9/10

Concluding Remarks Findings Firms cater to their destination Firm and quality type matter Firms are more likely to export to destinations where they have to discount Single-type firms have lower quality Single-type firms are less sensitive to destination characteristics 10/10