Plutonium 239 Equivalency Calculations

Similar documents
The Radiological Hazard of Plutonium Isotopes and Specific Plutonium Mixtures

The Radiological Hazard of. Plutonium Isotopes and SpecFc Plutonium Mixtures. Los Alamos

Fission-Fusion Neutron Source

Analysis of Shane Telescope Aberration and After Collimation

Flipping Bits in the James Webb Space Telescope s Cameras

Using the X-FEL to understand X-ray Thomson scattering for partially ionized plasmas

Development of a High Intensity EBIT for Basic and Applied Science

Capabilities for Testing the Electronic Configuration in Pu

Alex Dombos Michigan State University Nuclear and Particle Physics

Modeling Laser and e-beam Generated Plasma-Plume Experiments Using LASNEX

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (03/lfi?lfibr-~/15/1998):

C o f l F - 9m307-- SPREADSHEET APPLICATION TO CLASSIFY RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL FOR SHIPMENTa. A. N. Brown

Applications of Pulse Shape Analysis to HPGe Gamma-Ray Detectors

ION EXCHANGE SEPARATION OF PLUTONIUM AND GALLIUM (1) Resource and Inventory Requirements, (2) Waste, Emissions, and Effluent, and (3) Facility Size

Response to Comment on "The National Ignition Facility Laser Performance Status"

A Germanium Detector with Optimized Compton Veto for High Sensitivity at Low Energy

August 3,1999. Stiffness and Strength Properties for Basic Sandwich Material Core Types UCRL-JC B. Kim, R.M. Christensen.

(4) How do you develop an optimal signal detection technique from the knowledge of

CQNl_" RESPONSE TO 100% INTERNAL QUANTUM EFFICIENCY SILICON PHOTODIODES TO LOW ENERGY ELECTRONS AND IONS

BASAL CAMBRIAN BASELINE GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION COMPLETED

Two-Screen Method for Determining Electron Beam Energy and Deflection from Laser Wakefield Acceleration

Partial Discharge Characterization of High-Voltage Cables and Components

Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques

DML and Foil Measurements of ETA Beam Radius

Scaling of divertor heat flux profile widths in DIII-D

Modified Kriging: Evaluation, Modification, Recommendations

ASTER CONF-~W OSTI MAY DISTRIBUTION OF THIS

BWXT Y-12 Y-12. A BWXT/Bechtel Enterprise SMALL, PORTABLE, LIGHTWEIGHT DT NEUTRON GENERATOR FOR USE WITH NMIS

A Few-Group Delayed Neutron Model Based on a Consistent Set of Decay Constants. Joann M. Campbell Gregory D. Spriggs

Safety Considerations for Laser Power on Metals in Contact with High Explosives-Experimental and Calculational Results

PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT (06/16/1998-9/15/1998):

A Distributed Radiator, Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Confinement Fusion Target with Realistic, Multibeam Illumination Geometry

&OAE- 9b I 0 IS& - - I Determination of Plutonium in Urine: Evaluation of Electrothermal Vaporization Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy.

Final Technical Report. Department of Energy. for

From Single Bone Analysis to Total Skeleton Content

ASTER. Dose Rate Visualization of Radioisotope Thermoelectric. Generators. RECElVED BEC OF THIS DOCUMEMT IS UNLlMIi L, Hanford Company

Shock compression of precompressed deuterium

A Two-Dimensional Point-Kernel Model for Dose Calculations in a Glovebox Array. D. E. Kornreich and D. E. Dooley

Multi-Scale Chemical Process Modeling with Bayesian Nonparametric Regression

Hyperon Particle Physics at JHF. R. E. Mischke

Controlling Backstreaming Ions from X-ray Converter Targets with Time Varying Final Focusing Solenoidal Lens and Beam Energy Variation

Data Comparisons Y-12 West Tower Data

PROGRESS REPORT JULY TO SEPTEMBER

Initial Results from the Lick Observatory Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System

AEC Research and Development REPORT

SUMNER ASSOCIATES. 100 Cienega, Suite D Santa Fe, New Mexico Telephone: FAX CEIVED DEC 16 W STI

8STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF HIGH EXPLOSIVE DETONATION DATA. Beckman, Fernandez, Ramsay, and Wendelberger DRAFT 5/10/98 1.

12/16/95-3/15/96 PERIOD MULTI-PARAMETER ON-LINE COAL BULK ANALYSIS. 2, 1. Thermal Neutron Flux in Coal: New Coal Container Geometry

S.A. Kreek J.E. Kammeraad D. Beckedahl G.J. Schmid J.J. Blair B. Payne A. Friensehner

A Geological and Geophysical Assessment of the Royal Center Gas Storage Field in North-Central Indiana, a Joint NIPSCO, DOE & GRI Case Study

How Small Can a Launch Vehicle Be?

Solid Phase Microextraction Analysis of B83 SLTs and Core B Compatibility Test Units

RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES AT THE CNS (Y-12 AND PANTEX) NUCLEAR DETECTION AND SENSOR TESTING CENTERS (NDSTC)

FUSION TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE

Parametric Instabilities in Laser/Matter Interaction: From Noise Levels to Relativistic Regimes

Pathway and Kinetic Analysis on the Propyl Radical + O2 Reaction System

Measurement of Low Levels of Alpha in 99M0Product Solutions

Impurity Transport Studies of Intrinsic MO and Injected Ge in High Temperature ECRH Heated FTU Tokamak Plasmas

LLNL DATA COLLECTION DURING NOAAETL COPE EXPERIMENT

The temperature dependence of the C1+ propylene rate coefficient and the Arrhenius fit are shown in Figure 1.

The Gas Flow from the Gas Attenuator to the Beam Line

Quarterly Report April 1 - June 30, By: Shirley P. Dutton. Work Performed Under Contract No.: DE-FC22-95BC14936

The photoneutron yield predictions by PICA and comparison with the measurements

HEAT TRANSFER AND THERMAL STRESS ANALYSES OF A GLASS BEAM DUMP

Tell uric prof i 1 es across the Darrough Known Geothermal Resource Area, Nevada. Harold Kaufniann. Open-file Report No.

~ _- IDOCLRXKT DMSP SATELLITE DETECTIONS OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. J. Terrell, NIS-2 P. Lee, NIS-2 R W.

LQSAlamos National Laboratory

The Concentration of 236 Pu Daughters in Plutonium for Application to MOX Production from Plutonium from Dismantled US Nuclear Weapons

Abstract of paper proposed for the American Nuclear Society 1997 Winter Meeting Albuquerque, New Mexico November 16-20, 1997

GA A23736 EFFECTS OF CROSS-SECTION SHAPE ON L MODE AND H MODE ENERGY TRANSPORT

AuttWr(s): A. Blotz, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA

GA A26057 DEMONSTRATION OF ITER OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS ON DIII-D

AEC Research and Development REPORT

Turbulent Scaling in Fluids. Robert Ecke, MST-10 Ning Li, MST-10 Shi-Yi Li, T-13 Yuanming Liu, MST-10

The Highest Redshift Radio Galaxy Known in the Southern Hemisphere

The Graphite Isotope Ratio Method (GIRM): A Plutonium Production Verification Tool

A New Computational Method for non-lte, the Linear Response Matrix

Experiment. The Pinhole Neutron. Pinex. c. c. sartain UCRL-ID November 21,1958

Meraj Rahimi, JAI Co. Dale Lancaster, TRW Environmental Safety Systems

Simulation of Double-Null Divertor Plasmas with the UEDGE Code

DISCLAIMER. and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

INTERMOLECULAR POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND HIGH RESOLUTION MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY OF WEAKLY BOUND COMPLEXES. Final Progress Report

Optimization of NSLS-II Blade X-ray Beam Position Monitors: from Photoemission type to Diamond Detector. P. Ilinski

STP-TS THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF WORKING GASES USED IN WORKING GAS TURBINE APPLICATIONS

Multi-scale modeling with generalized dynamic discrepancy

National Accelerator Laboratory

Further Investigation of Spectral Temperature Feedbacks. Drew E. Kornreich TSA-7, M S F609

Determinktion of Iodine to Compliment Mass Spectrometric Measurements

D. L. Strenge PNL-SA A GENERAL ALGORITHM FOR RADIOACTIVE DECAY WITH BRANCHING AND LOSS FROM A MEDIUM DISCLAIMER. July 1995

Curvature of a Cantilever Beam Subjected to an Equi-Biaxial Bending Moment. P. Krulevitch G. C. Johnson

Inside Wall Temperature Measurements of DSTs Using an Infrared Temperature Sensor

Nuclear Excavation (Letter to- R. E. Miller, AEC)

Clifford K. Ho and Michael L. Wilson Sandia National Laboratories. P.O. Box Albuquerque, NM

GA A23713 RECENT ECCD EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON DIII D

Three-Dimensional Silicon Photonic Crystals

Neutron Detector Gamma Insensitivity Criteria

A NEW TARGET CONCEPT FOR PROTON ACCELERATOR DRIVEN BORON NEUTRON CAPTURE THERAPY APPLICATIONS* Brookhaven National Laboratory. P.O.

Materials Attractiveness and Security Strategy

Reactors and Fuels. Allen G. Croff Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ret.) NNSA/DOE Nevada Support Facility 232 Energy Way Las Vegas, NV

N. Tsoupas, E. Rodger, J. Claus, H.W. Foelsche, and P. Wanderer Brookhaven National Laboratory Associated Universities, Inc. Upton, New York 11973

Transcription:

LLNL-TR-490356 Plutonium 239 Equivalency Calculations J. Wen July 7, 2011

Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.

Plutonium 239 Equivalency Calculations Engineering Reference Document ERD11-500002-AA Prepared by: Josh Wen, TRED LLNL, Engineer Date Concurred by: Tony Ladran, DTED LLNL JASPER Engineering Lead Date Approved by: Randy Thomas, DTED Date LLNL JASPER Program Operations Manager

REVISION HISTORY Revision Affected Description & Reason for Change Date Number Pages AA Initial version of document All 5/24/11 Contents 1.0 Purpose... 3 2.0 Methodology... 3 3.0 References... 6 Plutonium 239 Equivalency (PuE) Calculation Datasheet... 7 Equation 1 PuE (CF, isotope)... 3 Equation 2 M,isotope... 3 Equation 3 CF Isotope... 4 Equation 4 PuE (CF, 30 yr)... 4 Table 1 - Isotopic Conversion Factors... 4 Table 2 - Typical 30-year-old Weapons Grade... 5 Table 3-30-year-old Weapons Grade Conversion Factor... 5 Page 2 of 7

1.0 Purpose This document provides the basis for converting actual weapons grade plutonium mass to a plutonium equivalency (PuE) mass of Plutonium 239. The conversion can be accomplished by performing calculations utilizing either: 1) Isotopic conversions factors (CF isotope ), or 2) 30-year-old weapons grade conversion factor (CF 30 yr ) Both of these methods are provided in this document. 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Isotopic Conversion Factors Material mass and isotopic data are needed to calculate PuE using the isotopic conversion factors, which will provide the actual PuE value at the time of calculation. PuE is the summation of the isotopic masses times their associated isotopic conversion factors for plutonium 239. [Equation 1] Equation 1 PuE (CF, isotope) M, isotope = Isotopic Mass (grams) CF, isotope = Isotopic Conversion Factor Equation 2 M,isotope M, total = Plutonium mass Isotopic conversion factors are calculated by a normalized equation, relative to Plutonium 239, of specific activity (SA) and cumulated dose inhalation affects based on 50-yr committed effective dose equivalent (CEDE). [Equation 3] Page 3 of 7

Equation 3 CF Isotope The isotopic conversion factors for converting weapons grade plutonium to PuE are provided in Table-1. Table 1 - Isotopic Conversion Factors Isotope SA (Ci/g) CEDE (rem/ci) CF isotope Pu238 1.713E+01 4.80E+08 2.63E+02 Pu239 6.133E-02 5.10E+08 1.00E+00 Pu240 2.268E-01 5.10E+08 3.70E+00 Pu241 1.031E+02 1.00E+07 3.30E+01 Pu242 3.931E-03 4.80E+08 6.03E-02 Am241 3.428E+00 5.20E+08 5.70E+01 The unit for specific activity (SA) is curies per gram (Ci/g) and the isotopic SA values come from reference [1]. The cumulated dose inhalation effect values in units of rem/ci are based on 50-yr committed effective dose equivalent (CEDE). A person irradiated by gamma radiation outside the body will receive a dose only during the period of irradiation. However, following an intake by inhalation, some radionuclides persist in the body and irradiate the various tissues for many years. There are three groups CEDE data representing lengths of time of 0.5 (D), 50 (W) and 500 (Y) days, which are in reference [2]. The CEDE values in the (W) group demonstrates the highest dose equivalent value; therefore they are used for the calculation. 2.2 30-year-old Weapons Grade Conversion Factor To calculate PuE using the 30-year-old weapons grade conversion factor, the Pu element mass and knowledge that the age is less than 30 years since separation is needed (no isotopic data required), which will provide a conservative PuE value. PuE is total elemental mass times 30-year-old weapons grade conversion factor. [Equation 4] Equation 4 PuE (CF, 30 yr) CF, 30 yr = 30-year-old weapons grade conversion factor Page 4 of 7

The conversion factor for 30 year-old weapons grade plutonium (CF 30 yr ) is calculated using a typical isotopic composition and weight percentage of 30-yr-old weapons grade plutonium values from Table 2 and isotopic conversions factors from Table 1. The Table 2 values are from reference [3]. In using this calculation, the user must know that the material is less than 30 years since separation. Table 2 - Typical 30-year-old Weapons Grade 30-year-old Weapons Grade Plutonium Isotope Weight % Pu238 0.03 Pu239 93.26 Pu240 5.98 Pu241 0.14 Pu242 0.04 Am241 0.45 CF 30 yr = 1.535 as calculated in Table 3. Table 3-30-year-old Weapons Grade Conversion Factor Isotope A. Weight % B. CF isotope A*B Pu238 0.03 2.63E+02 0.079 Pu239 93.26 1.00E+00 0.933 Pu240 5.98 3.70E+00 0.221 Pu241 0.14 3.30E+01 0.046 Pu242 0.04 6.03E-02 0.000 Am241 0.45 5.70E+01 0.257 Total 1.535 For a plutonium isotopic mixture that is predominantly elemental Plutonium, the plutonium isotopic mix is qualitatively similar to the hazards and would behave the same as 30-yr-old composition of weapons grade plutonium. The absorption rate, airborne release fraction (ARF) and airborne respirable fraction (RF) of ingrowth material will follow that of the host material. Since Am241 results from the decay of Pu241, Am241 will be in the plutonium matrix and exhibit the same release properties as plutonium, the ARF and RF for Plutonium are used for Americium. Page 5 of 7

3.0 References 1. LA-12846-MS, Specific Activities and DOE-STD-1027-92 Hazard Category 2 Thresholds LANL Fact Sheet, Los Alamos National Laboratory, November 1994. 2. DOE/EH 0071, Internal Dose Conversion Factors for Calculation of Dose to the Public, US Department of Energy, July 1988. 3. Facility Safety Plan - Building 332, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, July 2009. Page 6 of 7

Plutonium 239 Equivalency (PuE) Calculation Datasheet Datasheet to calculate the PuE, grams based on weapons grade plutonium material mass and isotopics. Follow instructions below. Instructions: Column A: Enter isotopic weight % for each isotope from the material isotopic datasheet Column B: Enter the total plutonium mass of the material Column C: Calculate the isotopic mass by multiplying columns A and B Column D: Isotopic conversion factors are given. Column E: Calculate isotopic PuE by multiplying columns C and D- PuE, total: Calculate total PuE, grams by summing column E A B C = A * B (Equation 2) D E = C * D (Equation1) Isotope Isotopic weight % Total Pu Mass, grams Isotopic Mass, grams CF isotope PuE, grams Pu238 Pu239 Pu240 Pu241 Pu242 Am241 2.63E+02 1.00E+00 3.70E+00 3.30E+01 6.03E-02 5.70E+01 PuE, total Equation 1, PuE (CF, isotope) M, isotope = Isotopic Mass (grams) CF, isotope = Isotopic Conversion Factor Equation 2, M,isotope M, total = Plutonium mass Page 7 of 7