Root Locus Design. MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

Similar documents
Proportional plus Integral (PI) Controller

Contents. PART I METHODS AND CONCEPTS 2. Transfer Function Approach Frequency Domain Representations... 42

1 Chapter 9: Design via Root Locus

The Root Locus Method

Intro to Frequency Domain Design

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

Root Locus Techniques

The loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by:

Systems Analysis and Control

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 5

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Root Locus Analysis

PD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

Course Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.

Methods for analysis and control of. Lecture 4: The root locus design method

1 An Overview and Brief History of Feedback Control 1. 2 Dynamic Models 23. Contents. Preface. xiii

State Space Design. MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

Root Locus. Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples. School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Root Locus - 1

Homework 7 - Solutions

Ultimate State. MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control

7.4 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE TO DRAW THE ROOT LOCUS DIAGRAM

Systems Analysis and Control

ME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION

Video 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh

Robust Control 9 Design Summary & Examples

Methods for analysis and control of dynamical systems Lecture 4: The root locus design method

Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology. EEE 402: Control System I Laboratory

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =

Exercises for lectures 13 Design using frequency methods

Essence of the Root Locus Technique

EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems

Pitch Rate CAS Design Project

AMME3500: System Dynamics & Control

Variable Structure Control ~ Disturbance Rejection. Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University

6.1 Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closed-loop characteristic equation is K + z 0.

Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop

Unit 8: Part 2: PD, PID, and Feedback Compensation

Input-output Controllability Analysis

Linear System Theory. Wonhee Kim Lecture 1. March 7, 2018

ECE 345 / ME 380 Introduction to Control Systems Lecture Notes 8

Lecture 14 - Using the MATLAB Control System Toolbox and Simulink Friday, February 8, 2013

Compensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus

Chapter Eleven. Frequency Domain Design Sensitivity Functions

Dynamic Compensation using root locus method

Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

Due Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5

Root Locus Methods. The root locus procedure

9/9/2011 Classical Control 1

ECEn 483 / ME 431 Case Studies. Randal W. Beard Brigham Young University

Topic # Feedback Control Systems

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

Plan of the Lecture. Goal: wrap up lead and lag control; start looking at frequency response as an alternative methodology for control systems design.

Chapter 9: Controller design

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering 2.04A Systems and Controls Spring 2013

Course roadmap. ME451: Control Systems. What is Root Locus? (Review) Characteristic equation & root locus. Lecture 18 Root locus: Sketch of proofs

Root Locus Design Example #4

Control Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Root Locus

Chemical Process Dynamics and Control. Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University

Lecture 25: Tue Nov 27, 2018

Systems Analysis and Control

MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions

Controller Design using Root Locus

Laboratory 11 Control Systems Laboratory ECE3557. State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint

Systems Analysis and Control

Single-Input-Single-Output Systems

Analysis and Synthesis of Single-Input Single-Output Control Systems

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

Vehicle longitudinal speed control

Chapter 2 SDOF Vibration Control 2.1 Transfer Function

Introduction to Feedback Control

Collocated versus non-collocated control [H04Q7]

D(s) G(s) A control system design definition

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.

PM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers

Design of a Lead Compensator

Systems Engineering/Process Control L1

Lecture 5 Classical Control Overview III. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN

Tradeoffs and Limits of Performance

Solutions for Tutorial 10 Stability Analysis

CYBER EXPLORATION LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS

Root Locus Design Example #3

State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Link

Module 3F2: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER 2 ROOT-LOCUS. Solutions

Systems Analysis and Control

EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions

1 x(k +1)=(Φ LH) x(k) = T 1 x 2 (k) x1 (0) 1 T x 2(0) T x 1 (0) x 2 (0) x(1) = x(2) = x(3) =

ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design

ECE 486 Control Systems

University of Utah Electrical & Computer Engineering Department ECE 3510 Lab 9 Inverted Pendulum

Inverted Pendulum. Objectives

Automatic Control II Computer exercise 3. LQG Design

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL

Transcription:

Root Locus Design MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University

Outline The root locus design method is an iterative, graphical procedure for selecting and tuning compensators. Basic Compensator Types The Root Locus Design process Example: BWR Pressure Control Hard Control Problems a brief introduction

Basic Compensators G s c ( ) Name Effect on Ultimate State Error Effect on Stability K K s + α s P (uncompensated) PI Improves Degrades K s 2 + α s 1 + α 0 s s + α K, α > β s + β s + α K, α < β s + β PID Improves Improves somewhat lag Improves somewhat Degrades somewhat lead Degrades somewhat Improves somewhat ( α ) K s + Rate feedback (PD) Degrades Improves s K s + 2ρωs+ ω 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 + 2ρω 2 2 s + ω2 Notch Neutralizes plant resonance

Procedure 1) Uncompensated system (proportional) Root locus Ultimate state error/step response 2) Compensated system Choose/modify compensator Root locus Ultimate state error/step 3) Repeat step 2)

Example: BWR Pressure Controller

BWR Pressure Control Model G R ( s) ( ) ( ) Reactor Pipe Dipole ( ) ( ) 2 2 2 2 s zr s zp s + 2ξν 1 1s+ ν 1 s + 2ξν N Ns+ ν N = γ 2 2 2 2 s pr s pp s + 2ρω 1 1s+ ω1 s + 2ρNωNs+ ωn Pipe Dipole Acoustics (first N harmonics)

BWR Transfer Functions ( ) ( + 8) ( ) ( ) 2 25 s+ 0.05 s+ 0.025 s + 2 0.05 12s+ 144 Gp ( s) = 15 2 2 ( s 5) s 0.1 s 4 s 2 0.25 8s 64 + + + + + s + 2 PI Gc ( s) = K s 2 s + 2 s + 2 0.15 8s+ 64 PI plus Notch Gc ( s) = K s 2 s

Uncompensated (P) >> s=tf('s'); >> Gp=15*(25/(s+5)^2)*((s+0.5)/(s+0.1))*((s+0.25)/(s+4))*((s^2+2*.05*12*s+144)/(s^2+2*.25*8*s+64)); >> rlocus(gp) >> sgrid >> [K,Poles]=rlocfind(G) Select a point in the graphics window sgrid selected_point = -1.1137 + 7.2050i K = 0.0324 Poles = -7.0808 + 5.5584i -7.0808-5.5584i -1.1219 + 7.5434i -1.1219-7.5434i -1.5793-0.1154 >> Gce=1/(1+K*Gp)

Uncompensated (P) 1 lim sge ( s) = 0.7452 s 0 s

Uncompensated (P), error response to step

PI Stability limit >> [K,Poles]=rlocfind(G) Select a point in the graphics window selected_point = -0.0047 + 7.6087i K = 0.0861 Poles = -7.6539 + 7.6078i -7.6539-7.6078i -0.0307 + 7.6511i -0.0307-7.6511i -2.2370-0.2469 + 0.1235i -0.2469-0.1235i

PI >> [K,Poles]=rlocfind(G) Select a point in the graphics window selected_point = -1.1706 + 7.2981i K = 0.0304 Poles = -6.4835 + 5.2251i -6.4835-5.2251i -1.1692 + 7.3192i -1.1692-7.3192i -2.4700-0.1623 + 0.1317i -0.1623-0.1317i

PI + Notch >> [K,Poles]=rlocfind(G) Select a point in the graphics window selected_point = -2.7133 + 3.6025i K = 0.0149 Poles = -10.8605 + 4.7906i -10.8605-4.7906i -2.0317 + 7.7960i -2.0317-7.7960i -2.8100 + 3.7251i -2.8100-3.7251i -2.4630-0.1163 + 0.1131i -0.1163-0.1131i

PI + Notch

PI + Notch Gain backed off a bit to achieve ~0.7 damping ratio >> [K,Poles]=rlocfind(G) Select a point in the graphics window selected_point = -3.3104 + 3.3540i K = 0.0083 Poles = -10.3532 + 4.0115i -10.3532-4.0115i -2.0187 + 7.7728i -2.0187-7.7728i -3.2814 + 3.3222i -3.2814-3.3222i -2.6142-0.0896 + 0.0880i -0.0896-0.0880i

Hard Control Problems Control design problems can be difficult for many reasons: Demanding specifications Nonlinearity Actuator/sensor constraints Coupling Implementation constraints to name a few. But here are some deceptively simple issues involving linear SISO systems that can give a designer headaches. Non-collocated Nuclear plant pressure control Large spacecraft attitude Flexible rocket attitude Right half plane zero Most tail lift aircraft (space shuttle) Steam plant level control Bicycle with front wheel steering Right half plane pole Rotorcraft High performance aircraft (F-16) Some high performance ground vehicles Most missiles Both RHF pole and zero Some aircraft (X-29) Bicycle with rear wheel steering Inverted pendulum

Example: Collocated vs Non-collocated The goal is to position the load. A position sensor can be placed on motor or load. 2 s + k 1 J2 Θ 1 = T J1 2 2 ( J1+ J2) k s s + JJ 1 2 k 1 Θ 2 = T JJ 1 2 2 2 ( J1+ J2) k s s + JJ 1 2 J = J = 1, k = 1 1 2 T θ1 θ2 motor load flexible shaft

Example Cont d G θ 1 = s s 2 ( s + 2) 2 2 + 1 Im Im G 1 θ = 2 2 2 s ( s + 2) Re Re Collocated Noncollocated

Lead Compensation Collocated Non-collocated

Lead Response (collocated case) θ2 e = θ θ 1

Lead + Notch Collocated Non-collocated

Right Half Plane Zero First, let s look at the effect of a zero on the step response: ( ) = G( s) = G( s) = 2 2 2 G s s y 1 1 s + 1 s 1 + 2s+ 1 s + 2s+ 1 s + 2s+ 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2-0.2 The RHP zero causes the output to initially move in the opposite direction. 2 4 6 8 10 t

Example: Simple Nonminimum Phase System Uncompensated Consider the process G p ( s) 10s + 1 s s ( + 1) Try a PD compensator c = ( ) = ( + 1.1) G s K s

Example with PD Poles look decent, but look at the initial error.

Example: Check Initial Error G G e e K = 1 1 = 1+ G 1+ K s+ 1.1 ( ) ( ) ( + 1) 2 ( s + s) + K( s+ 1.1)( 10s+ 1) ( + 1) 10s + 1 s s s( s ) 2 ( ) ( ) s s+ 1 + 1 = = 1 10K s + 1 10K s+ 1.1K 0.0790 (from MATLAB) s s Ge = 2 0.2099s + 0.2099s+ 0.08691 + 1 1 e( 0 ) = lim sge ( s) = 4.7642 s s 0.2099 Initial Value Theorem

Comments on Positive Feedback Root Locus Interpreting the root locus presents a problem because the system involves positive feedback (equivalently, negative K when using a negative feedback loop). This is because of the negative sign in the transfer function. Note that computing the root locus with MATLAB does not present a problem. Positive feedback (or K<0) root locus rules are slightly different from the negative feedback rules. Here are the two changes. 4. Real-axis segments: For K < 0, real axis segments to the left of an even number of finite real axis poles and/or zeros are part of the root locus.

Positive Feedback Root Locus, Cont d 5. Behavior at infinity: The root locus approaches infinity along asymptotes with angles: 2kπ θ =, k = 0, ± 1, ± 2, ± 3, # finite poles # finite zeros Furthermore, these asymptotes intersect the real axis at a common point given by σ = finite poles finite zeros # finite poles # finite zeros

F-16, X-29 G p ( s) = 1.645 ( + 0.0423101)( s+ 0.586543) s s ( s 0.730937)( s+ 1.7036)( s 2 + 0.0876334s+ 0.044546) Unstable Pole p ( ) = ( ) G s G s s 26 s 6 RHP pole-zero pair Minimum phase part