Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Similar documents
Soil Taxonomy Classification Osage County, Kansas. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Taxonomy Classification Jackson County, Florida (Chipola River) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Taxonomy Classification Washington County, Florida (Pine Log 631A)

Soil Taxonomy Classification Gadsden County, Florida (Imperial Nursery)

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Ocean County, New Jersey (Larsen & N New Prospect Jackson Twp., NJ)

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Custom Soil Resource Report. Soil Map. Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 14N WGS84. Feet.

CRUM RANCH AREA MAP YOLO COUNTY, California, AC +/-

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Custom Soil Resource Report for Victoria County, Texas

RANCHO de DOS PALMAS DAVIS, California, AC +/-

T his map is for illus trative purpos es only and does not repres ent a s urvey. I t is provided 'as is ' without warranty or any repres entation of

Cripps Ranch 76+/- Acres Orchard Development Opportunity Dixon, CA. Presented By:

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. GALE RANCH

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi 30 27' 27'' 30 26' 57''

Appendix 2b. NRCS Soil Survey

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Producing Chandler Walnut Orchard

FOR SALE. Features Rives Road Petersburg, Virginia Chris Jenkins

² 2015 Program Year. Farm Tract McLeod County, Minnesota 1:4, NHEL NHEL

Wright County, MN. Overview. Legend

BUNCOMBE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

Exhibit RMP-4. Foote Creek Geology and Topography

Carrick Road $798,000

Using the Web Soil Survey Resilience and Resistance Score Sheet Soils Report

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. BOWLSBEY 320 LIBERTY ISLAND ROAD BUYER: RASSMUSSEN TRUST

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Hartmann Ranch. potential vineyard ground acres +/

Custom Soil Resource Report for Solano County, California

Custom Soil Resource Report for Valley County, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

TRACT 7: ±252 Acres Irrigated Farmland Grassland

Chittenden Road Prune Orchard Corning, California

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Northwestern Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Columbus County, North Carolina

Custom Soil Resource Report for Cuyahoga County, Ohio

Custom Soil Resource Report for Island County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Stevens County, Washington

Custom Soil Resource Report for Palo Verde Area, California

Custom Soil Resource Report for Missoula County Area, Montana

SOIL TEST REPORTING ELKO SPORTS COMPLEX

Custom Soil Resource Report for Fresno County, California, Western Part

SOIL TEST REPORTING ELKO SPORTS COMPLEX

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon, and Marion County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Kern County, California, Southwest Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Luis Obispo County, California, Paso Robles Area

Alliance Ag Services, LLC

Sacramento River Farmland Anderson, California

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Atlantic County, New Jersey

Custom Soil Resource Report for St. Lucie County, Florida

Fall River Valley Irrigated Farmland

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Potter County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Old Thomasson Range, Chico, CA

O\.OLSSON \ ASSOC I ATES

Custom Soil Resource Report for Livingston Parish, Louisiana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Custer and Pennington Counties Area, Black Hills Parts, South Dakota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Garfield County, Oklahoma

Evergreen Packaging, Inc. Waste Management Plan

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Washington

2.a.. Physical Factors General Map

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wasco County, Oregon, Northern Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Santa Fe Area, New Mexico, Santa Fe County and Part of Rio Arriba County; and Santa Fe County Area, New Mexico

Aqua Dome Express Car Wash

Custom Soil Resource Report for Marion County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Falls County, Texas

PARADIGM ODP FORT COLLINS, CO 80525

APPENDICES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pinal County, Arizona, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gem County Area, Idaho

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Juan Area, Puerto Rico

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hansford County, Texas


Aperio Property Consultants, llc E. Grand Ave. Aurora, CO Phone (303) Contact: Aaron Thompson

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Coryell County, Texas

Transcription:

95 40' 40'' W 95 40' 0'' W 38 44' 27'' N 4290200 4290300 4290400 4290500 4290600 4290700 4290800 4290900 4291000 4291100 4291200 4291300 4291400 267300 267400 267500 267600 267700 267800 267900 268000 268100 268200 Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 4290200 4290300 4290400 4290500 4290600 4290700 4290800 4290900 4291000 4291100 4291200 4291300 4291400 38 44' 27'' N 38 43' 46'' N 267300 267400 267500 267600 267700 267800 267900 268000 268100 38 43' 46'' N 95 40' 40'' W N Map Scale: 1:6,290 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 300 600 1200 1800 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 95 40' 0'' W Page 1 of 6

Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Rating Polygons thermic Aquic thermic Oxyaquic Vertic Oxyaquic Vertic Vertic thermic Pachic Hapludolls Soil Rating Lines Soil Rating Points Not rated or not available MAP LEGEND thermic Aquic thermic Oxyaquic Vertic Oxyaquic Vertic Vertic thermic Pachic Hapludolls Not rated or not available Water Features Transportation thermic Aquic thermic Oxyaquic Vertic Oxyaquic Vertic Vertic thermic Pachic Hapludolls Not rated or not available Streams and Canals Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography Page 2 of 6

MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Osage County, Kansas Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 20, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 28, 2017 Jun 21, 2015 Feb The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Page 3 of 6

Soil Taxonomy Classification Soil Taxonomy Classification Summary by Map Unit Osage County, Kansas (KS139) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 8201 Osage silty clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded 8300 Verdigris silt loam, channeled, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded 1.9 1.2% 19.2 12.2% 8302 Verdigris silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, occasionally flooded 8501 Mason silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, rarely flooded 8659 Clareson-Eram complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky 8683 Dennis silt loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes 8735 Eram silty clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes 8775 Kenoma silt loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 8791 Lebo-Rock outcrop complex, 20 to 40 percent slopes 8911 Summit silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 8912 Summit silty clay loam, 3 to 7 percent slopes MT250B Aliceville silty clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes thermic Pachic Typic thermic Aquic thermic Aquic Vertic Typic Hapludolls Oxyaquic Vertic Oxyaquic Vertic thermic Oxyaquic Vertic 19.0 12.1% 3.4 2.2% 25.2 16.1% 3.7 2.4% 25.4 16.2% 32.8 20.9% 6.3 4.0% 0.8 0.5% 6.0 3.8% 13.2 8.4% Totals for Area of Interest 157.0 100.0% Page 4 of 6

Description This rating presents the taxonomic classification based on Soil Taxonomy. The system of soil classification used by the has six categories (Soil Survey Staff, 1999 and 2003). Beginning with the broadest, these categories are the order, suborder, great group, subgroup, family, and series. Classification is based on soil properties observed in the field or inferred from those observations or from laboratory measurements. This table shows the classification of the soils in the survey area. The categories are defined in the following paragraphs. ORDER. Twelve soil orders are recognized. The differences among orders reflect the dominant soil-forming processes and the degree of soil formation. Each order is identified by a word ending in sol. An example is Alfisols. SUBORDER. Each order is divided into suborders primarily on the basis of properties that influence soil genesis and are important to plant growth or properties that reflect the most important variables within the orders. The last syllable in the name of a suborder indicates the order. An example is Udalfs (Ud, meaning humid, plus alfs, from Alfisols). GREAT GROUP. Each suborder is divided into great groups on the basis of close similarities in kind, arrangement, and degree of development of pedogenic horizons; soil moisture and temperature regimes; type of saturation; and base status. Each great group is identified by the name of a suborder and by a prefix that indicates a property of the soil. An example is Hapludalfs (Hapl, meaning minimal horizonation, plus udalfs, the suborder of the Alfisols that has a udic moisture regime). SUBGROUP. Each great group has a typic subgroup. Other subgroups are intergrades or extragrades. The typic subgroup is the central concept of the great group; it is not necessarily the most extensive. Intergrades are transitions to other orders, suborders, or great groups. Extragrades have some properties that are not representative of the great group but do not indicate transitions to any other taxonomic class. Each subgroup is identified by one or more adjectives preceding the name of the great group. The adjective Typic identifies the subgroup that typifies the great group. An example is Typic Hapludalfs. FAMILY. Families are established within a subgroup on the basis of physical and chemical properties and other characteristics that affect management. Generally, the properties are those of horizons below plow depth where there is much biological activity. Among the properties and characteristics considered are particle-size class, mineralogy class, cation-exchange activity class, soil temperature regime, soil depth, and reaction class. A family name consists of the name of a subgroup preceded by terms that indicate soil properties. An example is fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic Typic Hapludalfs. SERIES. The series consists of soils within a family that have horizons similar in color, texture, structure, reaction, consistence, mineral and chemical composition, and arrangement in the profile. Page 5 of 6

References: Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition.. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture,. (The soils in a given survey area may have been classified according to earlier editions of this publication.) Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower Page 6 of 6