McKay Correspondence

Similar documents
Magda Sebestean. Communicated by P. Pragacz

Du Val Singularities

A CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MOONSHINE VERTEX OPERATOR ALGEBRA BY MEANS OF VIRASORO FRAMES. 1. Introduction

Chern numbers and Hilbert Modular Varieties

LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS

The Major Problems in Group Representation Theory

Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations

Macdonald polynomials and Hilbert schemes. Mark Haiman U.C. Berkeley LECTURE

Geometry of Conformal Field Theory

Outline. 1 Geometry and Commutative Algebra. 2 Singularities and Resolutions. 3 Noncommutative Algebra and Deformations. 4 Representation Theory

ON THE EXCEPTIONAL FIBRES OF KLEINIAN SINGULARITIES WILLIAM CRAWLEY-BOEVEY

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM, FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS

Advanced School and Workshop on Singularities in Geometry and Topology

Binary codes related to the moonshine vertex operator algebra

Moment map flows and the Hecke correspondence for quivers

On the GIT moduli of semistable pairs consisting of a plane cubic curve and a line

Combinatorics and geometry of E 7

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Math 210C. The representation ring

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

Math 797W Homework 4

Frames of the Leech lattice and their applications

Hypertoric varieties and hyperplane arrangements

mult V f, where the sum ranges over prime divisor V X. We say that two divisors D 1 and D 2 are linearly equivalent, denoted by sending

We can choose generators of this k-algebra: s i H 0 (X, L r i. H 0 (X, L mr )

The derived category of a GIT quotient

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

Extended groups and representation theory

1. Quivers and their representations: Basic definitions and examples.

Homogeneous Coordinate Ring

K3 Surfaces and Lattice Theory

Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

Definition 9.1. The scheme µ 1 (O)/G is called the Hamiltonian reduction of M with respect to G along O. We will denote by R(M, G, O).

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA

Some notes on Coxeter groups

Derived Canonical Algebras as One-Point Extensions

12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

Category O and its basic properties

The Hecke category (part II Satake equivalence)

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 21 Mar 1996

Algebraic group actions and quotients

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

Moduli spaces of sheaves and the boson-fermion correspondence

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

MA 206 notes: introduction to resolution of singularities

Semistable Representations of Quivers

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Representation Theory

The Terwilliger algebra of a Q-polynomial distance-regular graph with respect to a set of vertices

Math 249B. Tits systems

ADE Dynkin diagrams in algebra, geometry and beyond based on work of Ellen Kirkman

Toric Varieties. Madeline Brandt. April 26, 2017

Representations and Linear Actions

On a theorem of Ziv Ran

ALGEBRAIC HYPERBOLICITY OF THE VERY GENERAL QUINTIC SURFACE IN P 3

Toshiaki Shoji (Nagoya University) Character sheaves on a symmetric space and Kostka polynomials July 27, 2012, Osaka 1 / 1

OLIVIER SERMAN. Theorem 1.1. The moduli space of rank 3 vector bundles over a curve of genus 2 is a local complete intersection.

INTRODUCTION TO GEOMETRIC INVARIANT THEORY

LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES

Cluster varieties for tree-shaped quivers and their cohomology

Root system chip-firing

Algebraic Cobordism. 2nd German-Chinese Conference on Complex Geometry East China Normal University Shanghai-September 11-16, 2006.

The Hilbert-Mumford Criterion

where m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism

Topic Proposal Applying Representation Stability to Arithmetic Statistics

Presenting and Extending Hecke Endomorphism Algebras

MCKAY CORRESPONDENCE. Vadim Schechtman. September 2014

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

Isogeny invariance of the BSD conjecture

Intertwining integrals on completely solvable Lie groups

AN INTRODUCTION TO MODULI SPACES OF CURVES CONTENTS

Conditions for the Equivalence of Largeness and Positive vb 1

MODULI OF ALGEBRAIC SL 3 -VECTOR BUNDLES OVER ADJOINT REPRESENTATION

E 0 0 F [E] + [F ] = 3. Chern-Weil Theory How can you tell if idempotents over X are similar?

Character tables for some small groups

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

Simple connectedness of the 3-local geometry of the Monster. A.A. Ivanov. U. Meierfrankenfeld

On the geometric Langlands duality

Math 121 Homework 4: Notes on Selected Problems

PICARD GROUPS OF MODULI PROBLEMS II

Cohomology theories on projective homogeneous varieties

of S 2 (Γ(p)). (Hecke, 1928)

Langlands parameters and finite-dimensional representations

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

Reconstruction algebras of type D (II) Michael Wemyss

Instanton counting, Donaldson invariants, line bundles on moduli spaces of sheaves on rational surfaces. Lothar Göttsche ICTP, Trieste

Birational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits

A REMARK ON THE THEOREM OF OHSAWA-TAKEGOSHI

THE GL(2, C) MCKAY CORRESPONDENCE

HILBERT SCHEMES: GEOMETRY, COMBINATORICS, AND REPRESENTATION THEORY. 1. Introduction

Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras

Varieties of Characters

Local conformal nets arising from framed vertex operator algebras

CONJECTURES ON CHARACTER DEGREES FOR THE SIMPLE THOMPSON GROUP

Transcription:

1 McKay Correspondence To the memory of Peter Slodowy Iku Nakamura 005 November

1 Dynkin diagrams and ADE The following appear in connection with Dynkin (0) Dynkin diagram ADE (1) Finite subgroups of SL(, C), Regular polyhedra () -dim simple sing (deform-stable critical points) (3) simple Lie algebras ADE, II 1 -factors etc. (4) Partition func. of SL(, Z)-inv. conformal field thrys (5) Finite simple groups Fischer F 4, Baby monster B, Monster M, and McKay s 3rd observation on them (E 6, E 7, E 8 correspond to them)

3 A n 5 5 5... 5 5 5 D n 5 5 5... 5 5 5 E 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 E 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 E 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

4 Partition funct. of SL(, Z)-inv. conformal field theorys Dofinition: Z =Trq L 0+ L 0 where q = e π 1τ Assumptions 1. Unique vacuum( 1 state of min. energy). χ k : a A (1) 1 -character corresp. to a particle (or an operator in a physical theory) 3. Partition func. Z is a sum of χχ, (χ, χ :A (1) 1 -characters) 4. Z is SL(, Z)-inv., invariant under τ τ 1 (the parameter τ H : upper half-plane)

5 Classification of Z Cappelli, Itzykson-Zuber, A.Kato Type k + Partition function Z(q, θ, q, θ) A n n +1 n λ=1 χ λ D r 4r r 1 λ=1 χ λ 1 + χ 4r+1 λ + χ r 1, D r+1 4r r λ=1 χ λ 1 + r 1 λ=1 (χ λ χ 4r λ + χ λ χ 4r λ )+ χ r E 6 1 χ 1 + χ 7 + χ 4 + χ 8 + χ 5 + χ 11 E 7 18 χ 1 + χ 17 + χ 5 + χ 13 + χ 7 + χ 11 + χ 9 +(χ 3 + χ 15 ) χ 9 + χ 9 ( χ 3 + χ 15 ) E 8 30 χ 1 + χ 11 + χ 19 + χ 9 + χ 7 + χ 13 + χ 17 + χ 3

6 Indices of χ = Coxeter exponents of ADE Type Partition function Z and Coxeter exponents E 6 χ 1 + χ 7 + χ 4 + χ 8 + χ 5 + χ 11 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11 E 7 χ 1 + χ 17 + χ 5 + χ 13 + χ 7 + χ 11 + χ 9 +(χ 3 + χ 15 ) χ 9 + χ 9 ( χ 3 + χ 15 ) 1, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17 E 8 χ 1 + χ 11 + χ 19 + χ 9 + χ 7 + χ 13 + χ 17 + χ 3 1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 3, 9

7 (5) McKay s 3rd observation only conj. classes of involutions of Monster M. (Fischer) is one of the classes (Fischer involution). 1. {the conj. class of a b; a, b (Fischer)} = 9 classes. {order of a b; a, b (Fischer)} = {1,,, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6}, the same as mult. of vertices of Ẽ8, extended E 8. 6 Ẽ 8 6 6 6 3 6 6 6 6 6 4 6 5 4 3 1

8 Today McKay correspondence (1) = (0) [Ito-N. 1999] explains McKay (1) = (0) + () by Hilbert scheme of G-orbits G-Hilb(C ) G SL() Recall: (0) Dynkin diagrams ADE (1) Finite subgroups of SL(, C) () -dim. Simple sing. and their resol. (3) Simple Lie algebras ADE

9 well known and trivial 1. From finite groups to singularities : (1) = (). From singularities to Dynkin diag. () = (0) Recall: (0) Dynkin diagrams ADE (1) Finite subgroups of SL(, C) () -dim. Simple sing. and their resol. (3) Simple Lie algebras ADE

10 well known, but nontrivial 1. From Lie algebra to singulalities (3) = () Grothendieck, Brieskorn, Slodowy. From finite groups to Dynkin (1) = (0) (McKay) 3. Explanation for McKay (1) + () = (0) + () by vector bundles and their Chern classes (Gonzalez-Sprinberg, Verdier) Today [Ito-N. 1999] explains McKay (1) = (0) + () by Hilbert scheme of G-orbits : G-Hilb(C ), G SL()

11 More recent progress Topic(4) : Kawahigashi and other (Ann. Math. ) Topic(5) : Conway, Miyamoto, Lam-Yamada-Yamauchi Hot news John McKay received 003 CRM-Feilds-PIMS prize. Reason : Discovery of McKay corresp. and McKay s observation about Monster.

1 History 1978.11 Moonshine - Character table of Monster (Fischer-Thompson) 1978.1 McKay correspondence 1979.0 Discovery of (5) - Griess constructs Monster

13 3 dim. McKay corresp. thereafter G SL(3) Consider G-Hilb(C 3 ) only. 1. Smoothness G abelian : Nakamura. Smoothness & 3dim McKay corresp. (G abelian : Ito-Nakajima, G general : Bridgeland-King-Reid) 3. Structure G abelian : Nakamura, Craw-Reid 4. Structure of M θ (variants of G-Hilb(C 3 )) G abelian : Craw-Ishii 5. Structure G non-abelian : Gomi-Nakamura-Shinoda

14 Today McKay correspondence (1) = (0) [Ito-Nakamura 1999] explain (1) = (0) + () by G-Hilb(C ) : Hilbert scheme of G-orbits G SL() Recall: (0) Dynkin diagrams ADE (1) Finite subgroups of SL(, C) () -dim. Simple sing. and their resol.

15 Review : what is McKay correpondence Exam 1 G = G(D 5 ) : a dihedral group of order 1 G : generated by σ and τ σ = ζ 6 0 0 ζ6 1, τ = 0 1 1 0

16 Repres Tr(ρ) e e σ σ τ τ 3 ρ 0 χ 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 ρ 1 χ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ρ χ 1 1 0 0 ρ 3 χ 3 1 1 0 0 ρ 4 χ 4 1 1 1 1 i i ρ 5 χ 5 1 1 1 1 i i

17 Let ρ nat : G SL(, C) (the natural inclusion) Then repres.ρ i and their tensor products with ρ nat ρ ρ nat = ρ 0 + ρ 1 + ρ 3, ρ 0 ρ nat = ρ 1 ρ nat = ρ, ρ 3 ρ nat = ρ + ρ 4 + ρ 5, ρ 4 ρ nat = ρ 3, ρ 5 ρ nat = ρ 3. Draw a graph as follows: D 5 ρ 0 6 6 ρ ρ 3 ρ 4 6 6 6 6 ρ 1 ρ 5 Rule : Connect ρ i and ρ j ρ i ρ nat = ρ j + Remove ρ 0 (triv. repres.).then we get a Dynkin.

18 Exam (Continued) G = G(D 5 ) : a dihedral group of order 1 G : generated by σ and τ σ = ζ 6 0 0 ζ6 1, τ = 0 1 1 0 The quotient C /G has a unique sing. Invariant polynomials of G(D 5 ) and their relation are F = x 6 + y 6,G = x y,h = xy(x 6 y 6 ) G 4 GF + H =0

19 Invariant polynomials of G(D 5 ) and their relation are G 4 GF + H =0 The equation of D 5 is usually refered to as X 4 + XY + Z =0 A unique singularity (F, G, H) =(0, 0, 0) The exceptional set for the sing.(0, 0, 0) C 1 C C 4 C 5 C 3 C 1 C C 3 C 4 6 = 6 6 6 6 C 5 D 5 C i is P 1 (a line), intersecting at most transversely

0 The exceptional set for the sing.(0, 0, 0) C 1 C C 4 C 5 C 3 C 1 C C 3 C 4 6 = 6 6 6 6 C 5 D 5 C i is P 1 (a line), intersecting at most transv. The dual grapf of it is a Dynkin diagram D 5 Rule of dual graph : C i = a vertex, C i C j = an edge Conclusion : both Dynkin diagrams are the same (McKay correspondence)

1 McKay corresp. asserts : a relationship between (1) and () (1) Resolution of sing. of C /G () Representation theory of G

Exam 3 (Continued) G = G(D 5 ) : a dihedral group of order 1 G : generated by σ and τ σ = ζ 6 0 0 ζ6 1, τ = 0 1 1 0 The quotient C /G has a unique sing. Invariant polynom. of G(D 5 ) and relation F = x 6 + y 6,G = x y,h = xy(x 6 y 6 ) G 4 GF + H =0

3 Invariant polynom. of G(D 5 ) and relation are G 4 GF + H =0 The usual eq. of D 5 : X 4 + XY + Z =0 A unique singularity (F, G, H) =(0, 0, 0) When resolve sing, take quotients H/G = (x6 y 6 ) xy etc. with Denominators/Numerators not G(D 5 )-invariant. But xy, x 6 y 6 belong to the same repres. of G(D 5 ) Therefore Resolution of sing. and Repres. theory of G relate each other.

4 3 New resolution of simple sing. We dare to regard C /G as a moduli space C /G ={a G-inv. subset consisting of 1 points} : moduli of geometric G-orbits Resolution of C /G = moduli of ring-theor. G-orbits G - Hilb(C ):={a O C - G - module of length 1} For a module M G - Hilb(C ) 0 I O C M 0 (exact) G-module generating I is almost G-irreducible Example of generators of I : F t = xy t(x 6 y 6 )

5 4 The Hilbert scheme of n points The Hilbert scheme of n points in the space X Z : n points of X n points Z is a formal sum Z = n 1 P 1 + n P + + n r P r (P i P j ) (where n = n 1 + + n r )

6 Exam 4 Assume X =C. Let P i : x = α i, I Z = the ideal of Z I Z = f Z C[x] Z is the zero locus f Z (x) Z is n points equiv. dim C C[x]/I Z = n f Z (x) =(x α 1 ) n 1 (x α ) n (x α r ) n r = x n + a 1 x n 1 + + a n 1 x + a n e.g. if z = n [0], then I Z =(x n ) Hilb n (C) = {n points of X} n 1 bij. = xn + a n j x j ; a j C j=0 = C n

7 Exam 5 Assume X =C. Then Z = n 1 P 1 + + n r P r, (formal sum), P i P j, namely, Z X }{{} n X/order forgotton= X (n) X (n) = X }{{} n X/S n X (n) is very singular, has a lot of sing. Caution X (n) is different from Hilb n (C ).

8 Assume X =C. Let X [n] =Hilb n (C ). X [n] = {an ideal I C[x, y]; dim C[x, y]/i = n} I C[x, y]; I : a vector subsp of C[x, y] = xi I,yI I, dim C[x, y]/i = n Thm 1 (Fogarty 1968) X [n] is a resolution of X (n). A natural map π : X [n] X (n) is defined, π : Z n 1 P 1 + + n r P r where Z = {P 1,,P r },n i = multiplicity of P i in Z.

9 Thm (Fogarty 1968)(revisited) The natural morphism X [N] = Hilb N (C ) π X (N) is a resol (mimimal) of sing. The map π sends G-fixed points to G-fixed points. where G SL(), N = G. Then π G-inv. :(X [N] ) G-inv. (X (N) ) G-inv. By Thm of Fogarty (X [N] ) G-inv. is nonsing. G -inv. part of Fogarty = Next theorem

30 5 The G-orbit Hilbert scheme of C Lemma 3 (X (N) ) G-inv. =C /G. Def 4 G - Hilb(C ):=(X [N] ) G-inv. G - Hilb(C ) is called the G-orbit Hilbert scheme of C. For I G - Hilb(C ), C[x, y]/i = C[G] regular repres. Thm 5 (Ito-Nakamura 1999) G - Hilb(C ) is a minimal resol. of C /G with enough information about repres. of G.

31 Thm 6 (Ito-Nakamura 1999) G - Hilb(C ) is a minimal resol. of C /G with enough information about repres. of G. This gives a new explanation for McKay corresp. Vertices of Dynkin diagram (bijective) Irred. components of except. set (bijective) (McKay corresp.) Eq. class of irred. reps( trivial) of G

3 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

33 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

34 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

35 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

36 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

37 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

38 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

39 1 1 1 1 1 A n... (n vertices) 1 1 D n... 1 1 D 5 E 6 1 E 7 3 E 8 4 1 3 1 1 4 3 1 3 6 5 4 3 (n vertices)

40 6 The exceptional set D 5 case π : G - Hilb(C ) C /G the natural,ap G - Hilb(C ) \ π 1 (0) C /G \{0} (isom.) Let E = π 1 (0) be the exceptional set. Then E = {I G - Hilb(X); I m} where m =(x, y)c[x, y] : the maximal ideal. For I E, we set V (I) =I/(mI + n) where n =(F, G, H)C[x, y]. V (I) isag-module of generators of I other than G-inv. For I G - Hilb(C ), C[x, y]/i =C[G] : Regular rep.

41 Define a subset of E by E 1 :={I E; ρ 1 V (I)} = {I G - Hilb; m I,ρ 1 V (I)} E :={I E; V (I) ρ }. We will see E 1 = {I 1 (s); s C} I 1 ( ) P 1, E = {I (s); s C } I (0) I ( ) P 1, I 1 ( ) =I (0) (intersection)

4 The exceptional set E, E 1 an irred. comp. of E V (ρ 1 )={xy},v 6 (ρ 1 )={x 6 y 6 } I 1 (s) ={xy + s(x 6 y 6 )} + n I 1 (s) is an ideal generated by xy + s(x 6 y 6 ) and n =(F, G, H). We see, dim C[x, y]/i 1 (s) =1, I 1 (s) G - Hilb(C ) ( s C)

43 As s, If E I, we have I n =(F, G, H). Hence C[x, y]/n C[x, y]/i (surjective) E Grass.(C[x, y]/n, codim 11 Grass is compact, so that the sequence I 1 (s) (s C) converges. Now we define: I 1 ( )/n = lim s I 1(s)/n To compute I 1 ( ) = McKay corresp. appears!

44 I 1 (s) ={xy + s(x 6 y 6 )} + n (s 0) = { 1 s xy +(x6 y 6 )} + n (s 0) What happens when s =? Let 1 s =0. If I 1 ( ) ={x 6 y 6 } + n, Then I 1 ( ) / X [1], Absurd. The answer : I 1 ( ) ={x 6 y 6 } + {x y, xy } + n Since I 1 (s) n, x y, xy I 1 (s) for s 0. V 3 (ρ )={x y, xy } = {x, y} {xy} = ρ nat V (ρ 1 ) This reminds us of the McKay rule : ρ = ρ nat ρ 1

45 Recall E 1 :={I E; ρ 1 V (I)} E :={I E; ρ V (I)}. We saw We will see E 1 = {I 1 (s); s C} I 1 ( ) P 1 E = {I (s); s C} I ( ) P 1

46 V 3 (ρ )={x y, xy }, V 5 (ρ 1 )={ y 5,x 5 } Similarly for t 0, we define I (t) :=(x y ty 5,xy + tx 5 )+n We see V (I (t)) ρ. Then, E = {I E; ρ V (I)} P 1 As t 0, by the same reason as I 1 ( ), I (0) (x y, xy )+n

47 I (0) = (x y, xy )+(x 6 y 6 )+n = I 1 ( ) Intersection of E 1 and E!! This comes from McKay rule because V 6 (ρ 1 ) = {x 6 y 6 } = {x, y} { y 5,x 5 } mod n = ρ nat V 5 (ρ ) mod n +(x y, xy ) This reminds us of McKay rule : ρ 1 + = ρ nat ρ D 5 ρ 0 ρ ρ 3 ρ 4 ρ 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 ρ 5

48 I 1 (s) ={(1/s)(xy) +(x 6 y 6 )+n I 1 ( ) =(x y, xy ) +(x 6 y 6 )+n V 3 (ρ )={x y, xy } = {x, y} {xy} = ρ nat V (ρ 1 ) This reminds us of McKay rule : ρ = ρ nat ρ 1 I (t) =(x y + t( y 5 ),xy + tx 5 )+n I (0) = (x y, xy )+(x 6 y 6 ) + n V 6 (ρ 1 ) {x 6 y 6 } {x, y} { y 5,x 5 } ρ nat V 5 (ρ ) mod n +(x y, xy ) This reminds us of McKay rule : ρ 1 + = ρ nat ρ Let (1/s) =0 t =0,Red part changes into Green.

49 E(ρ 1 ) E(ρ ) E(ρ 1 ) I 1 ( ) E(ρ ) I 1 (s) (s C) I (t) (t C ) I (0) V (I 1 (s)) ρ 1, V (I (t)) ρ, V (I 1 ( )) = V (I (0)) ρ 1 ρ s C, t C(s 0) where V (I) =I/(mI + n) generators of I

50 D 5 ρ 0 ρ ρ 3 ρ 4 ρ 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 ρ 5 ρ ρ nat = ρ 0 + ρ 1 + ρ 3 ρ 1 ρ nat = ρ How does the Dynkin diag. come out?

51 m V m (ρ) Eq. class 1 {x, y} ρ {xy} {x,y } ρ 1 + ρ 3 3 {x y, xy } {x 3 ± iy 3 } ρ + ρ + 4 + ρ 5 4 {y 4,x 4 } {x 3 y, xy 3 } ρ 3 5 {y 5, x 5 } {xy(x 3 ± ( iy 3 ))} ρ + ρ + 4 + ρ 5 6 {x 6 y 6 } {x 5 y, xy 5 } ρ 1 + ρ 3 7 {xy 6,x 6 y} ρ Decomposition of the coinv. alg. into repres. of G(D 5 ) Coinv. alg. : C[x, y]/n =C[x, y]/(f, G, H)

5 Degree 1 3 4 Repr. ρ ρ 1 + ρ 3 ρ + ρ 4 + ρ 5 ρ 3 Degree 7 6 5 Repr. ρ ρ 1 + ρ 3 ρ + ρ 4 + ρ 5 The quiver str. of the red part determ. the Dynkin diag. Let V 1 = {x, y} V 1 V (ρ 1 )=V 3 (ρ ), V 1 V 3 (ρ ) V 4 (ρ 3 ), V 1 V 3 (ρ 4 ) V 4 (ρ 3 ),

53 Degree 1 3 4 Repr. ρ ρ 1 + ρ 3 ρ + ρ 4 + ρ 5 ρ 3 Degree 7 6 5 Repr. ρ ρ 1 + ρ 3 ρ + ρ 4 + ρ 5 Quiver str. of Red part determ. Dynkin. Deg.3: V 1 ρ 1 = ρ, where, V 1 = {x, y} Deg.4: V 1 ρ = ρ 3, V 1 ρ 4 = ρ 3, V 1 ρ 5 = ρ 3 Deg.5: V 1 ρ 3 ρ ρ 4 ρ 5 Deg.6: V 1 ρ ρ 1, V 1 ρ 4 0, V 1 ρ 5 0 The green part is contained in I

54 Quiver str. of D 5 V (ρ 1 ) V 6 (ρ 1 ) V 3 (ρ ) V 5 (ρ ) V 4 (ρ 3 ) V 3 (ρ 4 ) V 5 (ρ 4 ) V 3 (ρ 5 ) V 5 (ρ 5 )

55 Dynkin diagram D 5 V (ρ 1 ) V 6 (ρ 1 ) V 3 (ρ ) V 5 (ρ ) V 4 (ρ 3 ) V 3 (ρ 4 ) V 5 (ρ 4 ) V 3 (ρ 5 ) V 5 (ρ 5 )

56 Compute from lower degrees V (ρ 1 ) V 6 (ρ 1 ) V 3 (ρ ) V 5 (ρ ) V 4 (ρ 3 ) V 3 (ρ 4 ) V 5 (ρ 4 ) V 3 (ρ 5 ) V 5 (ρ 5 )

57 7 Exceptional set E 6 -case G(E 6 ) SL(, C) (Binary Tetrahedral Group) σ = G(E 6 )= σ, τ, µ order 4 i, 0, τ = 0, 1, µ = 1 0, i 1, 0 where ɛ = e πi/8. ɛ7,ɛ 7, ɛ 5, ɛ G(D 4 ):= σ, τ, normal in G(E 6 ) 1 G(D 4 ) G(E 6 ) Z/3Z 1. C /G(D 4 ) 3:1 C /G(E 6 )

58 Irred. rep. of E 6 (irred. character) 1 1 τ µ µ µ 4 µ 5 ( ) 1 1 6 4 4 4 4 ρ 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ρ 0 1 1 1 1 ρ 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 ρ 0 ω ω ω ω ρ 1 1 1 1 ω ω ω ω ρ 0 ω ω ω ω ρ 1 1 1 1 ω ω ω ω

59 Coinv. alg. of E 6 m V m 1 ρ ρ 3 3 ρ + ρ 4 ρ 1 + ρ 1 + ρ 3 5 ρ + ρ + ρ 6 ρ 3 7 ρ + ρ + ρ 8 ρ 1 + ρ 1 + ρ 3 9 ρ + ρ 10 ρ 3 11 ρ

60 V 5 (ρ ) V 7 (ρ ) V 4 (ρ 1 ) V 8 (ρ 1 ) V 5 (ρ ) V 7 (ρ ) V 6 (ρ 3 ) V 5 (ρ ) V 7 (ρ ) V 4 (ρ 1 ) V 8 (ρ 1 ) Dynkin diagram E 6

61 V 5 (ρ ) V 7 (ρ ) V 4 (ρ 1 ) V 8 (ρ 1 ) V 5 (ρ ) V 7 (ρ ) V 6 (ρ 3 ) V 5 (ρ ) V 7 (ρ ) V 4 (ρ 1 ) V 8 (ρ 1 ) Dynkin diagram E 6

6 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

63 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

64 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

65 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

66 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

67 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

68 A n... D n... D 5 E 6 E 7 E 8

69 8 Summary Need only to compute E the exceptional set. Need only to see the coinv. alg. C[x, y]/(f, G, H) G-inv. polyn. are zero in the coinv. alg. Look at coinv. alg. Forget trivial rep. in D, Ẽ. The red part of the coinv. alg. determines Dynkin. Degree 1 3 4 Repr. ρ ρ 1 + ρ 3 ρ + ρ 4 + ρ 5 ρ 3 Degree 7 6 5 Repr. ρ ρ 1 + ρ 3 ρ + ρ 4 + ρ 5

70 For I E : (except. set), we define V (I) :=I/(mI + n) Then V (I) is either irred. or ρ ρ (ρ, ρ irred.) For ρ, ρ irred rep of G, ρ ρ, define subsets of E by E(ρ) :={I E; V (I) ρ} P (ρ, ρ ):={I E; V (I) ρ ρ }

71 Thm 7 (Ito-Nakamura 1999) Let G be a finite subgroup of SL(, C). Then (1) G-Hilb(C ) is a min. resol. of C /G. () For any irred rep. ρ of G, ρ trivial, E(ρ) =P 1, The map ρ E(ρ) is McKay corresp. (3) Decomp. rule of ρ nat into irred. rep. determine the quiver str. of the coinv. algebra, from which the intersection P (ρ, ρ ) between E(ρ) come out.

7 End Thank you for your attention.