Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers

Similar documents
Angular Momentum. Andreas Wacker Mathematical Physics Lund University

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Compendium Quantum Mechanics FYSN17/FMFN01

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Outline

The quantum state as a vector

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 12 and Study Aid

Solution to Problem Set No. 6: Time Independent Perturbation Theory

CHAPTER 6: AN APPLICATION OF PERTURBATION THEORY THE FINE AND HYPERFINE STRUCTURE OF THE HYDROGEN ATOM. (From Cohen-Tannoudji, Chapter XII)

Addition of Angular Momenta

1 Mathematical preliminaries

Notes on Quantum Mechanics. Finn Ravndal Institute of Physics University of Oslo, Norway

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 14 Coupling of Angular Momenta

ψ s a ˆn a s b ˆn b ψ Hint: Because the state is spherically symmetric the answer can depend only on the angle between the two directions.

msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

Lecture 7. More dimensions

Quantum Dynamics. March 10, 2017

Adding angular momenta

Approximation Methods in QM

PH 451/551 Quantum Mechanics Capstone Winter 201x

Ch 125a Problem Set 1

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 1

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd.

Physics 342 Lecture 27. Spin. Lecture 27. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

PHY 407 QUANTUM MECHANICS Fall 05 Problem set 1 Due Sep

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

11.D.2. Collision Operators

Lecture #1. Review. Postulates of quantum mechanics (1-3) Postulate 1

Lecture 11 Spin, orbital, and total angular momentum Mechanics. 1 Very brief background. 2 General properties of angular momentum operators

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Time part of the equation can be separated by substituting independent equation

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

6.1 Nondegenerate Perturbation Theory

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen

3. Quantum Mechanics in 3D

Solutions to chapter 4 problems

1 Commutators (10 pts)

16.1. PROBLEM SET I 197

Lecture #13 1. Incorporating a vector potential into the Hamiltonian 2. Spin postulates 3. Description of spin states 4. Identical particles in

ψ(t) = U(t) ψ(0). (6.1.1)

(1.1) In particular, ψ( q 1, m 1 ; ; q N, m N ) 2 is the probability to find the first particle

Angular Momentum. Classical. J r p. radius vector from origin. linear momentum. determinant form of cross product iˆ xˆ J J J J J J

Group Theory and Its Applications in Physics

Implications of Time-Reversal Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics

Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 2011 FINAL EXAM Thursday December 22, 9:00 am -12:00 You have 3 hours.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department

CONTENTS. vii. CHAPTER 2 Operators 15

Lecture 12. The harmonic oscillator

Perturbation Theory. Andreas Wacker Mathematical Physics Lund University

Coupling of Angular Momenta Isospin Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction

Quantum mechanics in one hour

Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 20 Parity

Spin Dynamics Basic Theory Operators. Richard Green SBD Research Group Department of Chemistry

The Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2004 Assignment 3

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics PVK - Solutions. Nicolas Lanzetti

Rotations in Quantum Mechanics

QUANTUM MECHANICS. Franz Schwabl. Translated by Ronald Kates. ff Springer

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19

The experiment consists of studying the deflection of a beam of neutral ground state paramagnetic atoms (silver) in inhomogeneous magnetic field:

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 21 Hyperfine Structure in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms

Chemistry 483 Lecture Topics Fall 2009

Alkali metals show splitting of spectral lines in absence of magnetic field. s lines not split p, d lines split

2. The Schrödinger equation for one-particle problems. 5. Atoms and the periodic table of chemical elements

Lecture 4 Quantum mechanics in more than one-dimension

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

6.2 Unitary and Hermitian operators

Reading: Mathchapters F and G, MQ - Ch. 7-8, Lecture notes on hydrogen atom.

Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics

Isotropic harmonic oscillator

ΑΜ Α and ΒΜ Β angular momentum basis states to form coupled ΑΒCΜ C basis states RWF Lecture #4. The Wigner-Eckart Theorem

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

( ). Expanding the square and keeping in mind that

In this lecture we will go through the method of coupling of angular momentum.

Problem 1: A 3-D Spherical Well(10 Points)

Mathematical Structures of Quantum Mechanics

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Physics Thursday February 21, Problem # 1 (10pts) We are given the operator U(m, n) defined by

Electric and Magnetic Forces in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Formalism

in terms of the classical frequency, ω = , puts the classical Hamiltonian in the form H = p2 2m + mω2 x 2

Simple one-dimensional potentials

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Chm 331 Fall 2015, Exercise Set 4 NMR Review Problems

Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals

PHY413 Quantum Mechanics B Duration: 2 hours 30 minutes

SCIENCE VISION INSTITUTE For CSIR NET/JRF, GATE, JEST, TIFR & IIT-JAM Web:

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory

7.1 Creation and annihilation operators

Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions

Physics 221A Fall 2005 Homework 11 Due Thursday, November 17, 2005

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson. Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation. Non-Relativistic QM (Revision)

EE201/MSE207 Lecture 10 Angular momentum

The Klein-Gordon equation

Chemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):

Chapter 2. Linear Algebra. rather simple and learning them will eventually allow us to explain the strange results of

Transcription:

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers kets ϕ> and complex numbers α with two operations Addition of two kets ϕ 1 >+ ϕ 2 > is also a ket ϕ 3 > Multiplication with complex numbers α ϕ 1 > is also a ket ϕ 2 > Satisfying: Commutativity of addition ϕ 1 >+ ϕ 2 >= ϕ 2 >+ ϕ 1 > Associativity of addition ( ϕ 1 >+ ϕ 2 >)+ ϕ 3 >= ϕ 1 >+( ϕ 2 >+ ϕ 3 >) There is a state null> with ϕ>+ null>= ϕ> for all ϕ> Each state ϕ> has an inverse ϕ> with ϕ>+ ϕ>= null> (write + ϕ> as - ϕ>) 1 ϕ>= ϕ> (α+β) ϕ>=α ϕ>+β ϕ> and α( ϕ 1 >+ ϕ 2 >)=α ϕ 1 >+α ϕ 2 > (αβ) ϕ>=α(β ϕ>)

The scalar (or inner) product and bra's For ϕ 1 > and ϕ 2 > define <ϕ 1 ϕ 2 >=α with <ϕ ϕ> is real and positive, unless ϕ>= null>, where <null null> =0 <ϕ 1 ϕ 2 >=<ϕ 2 ϕ 1 > * For ϕ 3 >=α ϕ 1 >+β ϕ 2 > we have <ϕ ϕ 3 >=α<ϕ ϕ 1 >+β<ϕ ϕ 2 > <ϕ 3 ϕ>=α * <ϕ 1 ϕ>+β * <ϕ 2 ϕ> Treat <ϕ as an object on its own, called bra. The bras form their own vector space, the dual space dual correspondence ϕ> <ϕ <ϕ 1 ϕ 2 > bra(c)ket Note ϕ 3 >=α ϕ 1 >+β ϕ 2 > <ϕ 3 =α * <ϕ 1 +β * <ϕ 2

Bases A basis is a set { a i >} which allows to construct any ϕ> as ϕ>= i c i a i > with unique complex numbers c i An orthonormal (ON) basis satisfies <a i a j >=δ ij For an ON basis we find: Expansion coefficients c i =<a i ϕ> Completeness relation i a i ><a i =1 <ϕ ϕ>= i c i 2

Linear Operators Operator  transforms  Φ>= Φ'> Linear operator: Â(α Φ>+β φ>)=αâ Φ>+β φ> Product between operators Ĥ=Ĉ the operator transforming Ĥ Φ>=Ĉ( Φ>) commutator [Ĉ,Â]=ĈÂ-ÂĈ

Matrix representation For ON basis { a i >} evaluate State ϕ> coefficients c i =<a i ϕ> Operator  coefficients A ij =<a i  a j > All calculations become matrix-operations Note: Depends on basis used, only for ON basis

Important relations for the adjoint operator In matrix representation: A ij =<a i  a j >=<a j  a i >*=A ji * Exercises: If  =Â:  is called hermitian (self-adjoint), A ij =A ji * If  Â=1:  is called unitary

Hermitian Operators Matrices with A ij =A ji * can be diagonalized ( A (n) 11 A 12 (n) A 21 A 22 c 2 )(c1 Eigenstates u n = form a new ON basis i (n) n(c1 )=λ (n) c 2 ) with real λ n c (n) i a i with Α un =λ n u n  hermitian Α= n λ n u n u n

Common eigenstates of two Hermite operators  and Ĉ [Â,Ĉ]=0 There exists an ON basis { a n >}, where all a n > are simultaneously eigenstates of  and Ĉ (possibly with different eigenvalues) Note: [Â,Ĉ]=0 does not imply that each eigenstate of  is also eigenstate of Ĉ

Operators representing observables Measurement: Real measurement values α n associated with physical states a n > providing ON basis Expectation value for state Ψ>: with Hermitian operator Physical observable Hermitian operator

Continuous spectrum and spatial representation For continuous measurement values, e.g. spatial position x Eigenstates as before But continuum of states cannot be counted Instead: Any state can be written as Common wavefunction

Three spatial dimensions Postulate Thus there is a common set of eigenstates x,y,z> Ψ(r)=<x,y,z Ψ>

Function of an operator I Taylor Series Frequently we write f(â) what does it mean? For f (x)=x n we define f (Â)=Ân   For f (x)= n=0 n times f n n! xn we define f (Â)= n=0 f n n! Ân Exercise: [ B, Ân ]=n[ B, Â] An 1 if [[ B, Â], Â]=0 Important implication: [ B, f (Â)]=[ B, Â] f ' (Â) if [[ B, Â], Â]=0

Function of an operator II Projection on eigenstates Hermitean operators have a complete set of eigenstates Â= α n a n >< a n n f (Â)= f (α n ) a n ><a n n

Change of basis Old basis { a n >}, new basis { b n >} Operator for basis change Û= n Ψ >= n c n a n >= m c' m = b m Ψ = n c ' m b m > b m a n c n = a m U a n b n >< a n unitary! Matrix for basis change

Solving the stationary Schrödinger equation by diagonalization Stationary Schrödinger Eq. Search for eigen-energies E n and states φ n > Use matrix representation!

One-dimensional harmonic Oscillator Hamiltonian in analogy with classical case Ĥ = p2 2m +1 2 mω2 x 2 P= p m ħ ω, X = x mω satisfying [ P, X ]= 1 ħ i Factorize Define â= 1 2 ( X +i P ) Ĥ= 1 2 ħ ω {( X i P)( X +i P)+i[ P, X ]} Task: Find eigenvalues and -states of N =â â â= m ω 2 ħ x+i 1 Relation to original x,p 2m ω ħ p x= ħ 2 mω (â +â ) p=i mωħ (â â ) 2 Ĥ= 1 2 ħ ω ( P 2 + X 2 ) Ĥ=ħ ω ( â â+ 1 2 ) with [â,â ]=1 Not Hermitian!

Eigenvalue problem N φ n >=n φ n > with n R n 0 N =â â [ â,â ]=1 â φ n > is also eigenstate of N with eigenvalue n+1 â φ n > is also eigenstate of N with eigenvalue n 1 Sequence (k φ ) n >=â k φ n > of eigenstates of N with eigenvalues n k (k Stops after k if â φ ) n >= φ death > null> (k requires 0= φ death φ death = φ ) n â (k â φ ) (k ) n =(n k ) φ n (k φ ) n n=k is an integer number! (n=0,1,2,..)

Normalized eigenstates N φ n >=n φ n > with n N 0 N =â â [ â,â ]=1 φ n+1 >= 1 n+1 â φ n > and φ n 1 >= 1 n â φ n > Or: φ n >= 1 n! (â ) k φ 0 > where N φ 0 >=0 φ 0 > For each eigenstate, there exists a sequence of states with energy eigenvalues E n =ħω(n+1/2), n=0,1,2,... Ground state φ 0 > with E 0 =ħ ω/2 satisfies â φ 0 >=0

Example: calculate m x 2 n x= ħ 2 mω (â +â ) p=i mωħ (â â) 2 â n>= n+1 n+1>, â n>= n n 1>

Spatial representation: Ground state Ground state φ 0 > with E 0 =ħ ω/2 satisfies â φ 0 >=0 â= m ω 2ħ x+i 1 2m ωħ p < x â dx ' x ' >< x ' φ 0 >=0 ( mω 2 ħ x+ ħ 2m ω x ) φ 0 ( x)=0 or with ξ= mω ħ x : 1 2 ( ξ+ ξ ) φ 0 (ξ)=0 Normalized solution φ 0 (ξ)=π 1/ 4 e ξ2 /2

Spatial representation: Excited states â n>= n+1 n+1>, â n>= n n 1> = â mω 2 ħ x i 1 2m ω ħ p 1 ( 2 ξ ) ξ φ n (ξ)= 1 2 n n! (ξ ξ ) n φ 0 (ξ)= Representation via Hermite- Polynomials 1 π 1/ 4 2 n n! (ξ ξ ) n e ξ2 / 2 ( ξ ξ ) n e ξ2 / 2 =e ξ2 / 2 ( 1) n e ξ2 ( ξ ) n e ξ2 = H n (ξ) Math: These form a basis for the square-integrable functions in 1dimension

Eigenstates in spatial coordinates

Two dimensions with E=ħ ω (N +1 ) N =0,1,2,.. (N+1) fold degeneracy Spatial representations

Three dimensions E=ħ ω ( N +3/2) N =0,1,2,.. (N+1)(N+2)/2 fold degeneracy Alternative solution in spherical coordinates Ansatz spherical harmonics Radial part

Commutation relations of (orbital) angular momentum Angular momentum in analogy with classical case L= r p satisfies commutation relations [ L x, L y ]=i ħ L z [ L y, L z ]=i ħ L x [ L z, L x ]=i ħ L y and consequently [ L 2, L i ]=0 for i=x, y, z

Generalized angular momentum Common eigenstates Hermitian operators Ĵ x, Ĵ y, Ĵ z satisfying [Ĵ j, Ĵ k ]=i ħ l ϵ jkl Ĵ j Ĵ 2 =Ĵ x 2 +Ĵ y 2 +Ĵ z 2 satisfies [Ĵ 2, Ĵ j ]=0 Eigenvalues of Ĵ 2 are not negative Search set of common eigenstates j, m satisfying Ĵ 2 j, m = j ( j +1)ħ 2 j,m and Ĵ z j,m =m ħ j,m with j 0

Properties of Ψ + =Ĵ + j, m Ĵ 2 j, m = j ( j +1)ħ 2 j,m and Ĵ z j, m =m ħ j,m with j 0 Define Ĵ + =Ĵ x +i Ĵ y and Ĵ - =Ĵ x i Ĵ y =Ĵ + Ψ + Ψ + =[ j ( j+1) m(m+1)]ħ 2 (a) m j (b) Ψ + = null m= j or m= j 1 (c) Ĵ 2 Ψ + = j ( j+1)ħ 2 Ψ + and Ĵ z Ψ + =(m+1)ħ Ψ + Identify j, m+1 = 1 ħ j ( j+1) m(m+1) Ĵ + j, m

Properties of Ψ - =Ĵ - j, m Ĵ 2 j, m = j ( j +1)ħ 2 j,m and Ĵ z j,m =m ħ j,m with j 0 Define Ĵ + =Ĵ x +i Ĵ y and Ĵ - =Ĵ x i Ĵ y =Ĵ + Ψ - Ψ - =[ j ( j+1) m(m 1)]ħ 2 (a) m j (b) Ψ - = null m= j or m= j+1 (c) Ĵ 2 Ψ - = j ( j +1)ħ 2 Ψ - and Ĵ z Ψ - =(m 1)ħ Ψ - Identify j,m 1 = 1 ħ j ( j +1) m(m 1) Ĵ - j, m

Common eigenstates of Ĵ 2 and Ĵ z j-m, j+m N 0 2j N 0 Sequence of states j,m>, m=-j,j+1,...,j 1 j, m+1 = ħ j ( j+1) m(m+1) Ĵ + j,m j, m 1 = 1 ħ j ( j+1) m(m 1) Ĵ - j,m Ĵ 2 j, m = j ( j +1)ħ 2 j,m and Ĵ z j,m =m ħ j,m with j=0, 1 2,1, 3 2, and m= j, j+1, j form multiplets M j with 2j+1 states

Eigenstates of Hamiltonian with full rotational symmetry Rotational symmetry: [Ĥ,Ĵ i ]=0 for i=x,y,z and thus [Ĥ,Ĵ 2 ]=0 There exists a common set of eigenstates of Ĥ,Ĵ z, and Ĵ 2 All elements of the multiplet j,m>, m=-j,-j+1,...j have the same energy (2j+1)-fold degeneracy

Spin: two-fold degeneracy implies j=1/2 j, m+1 = j, m 1 = 1 ħ j ( j+1) m(m+1) Ĵ + j,m 1 ħ j ( j+1) m(m 1) Ĵ - j,m Notation: Ĵ i Ŝ i

Magnetic moment is related to angular momentum of a particle classical homogeneously charged particle μ= q 2m L Define gyromagnetic ratio (Landé-factor, g-factor) atomic physics dominated by electrons μ= g e Ŝ with e>0 2m e Pure electron spin: g e =2.0023... (quantum electrodynamics) nuclear physics dominated by protons μ=g Proton: g p =5.5883... Neutron: g n =-3.8263... e 2m p Ŝ

Coupling between two spins: The product space Positronium: Bound system of one electron and one positron Arbitrary state Ŝ ħ 2 [( 0 1 1 0) e x + ( 0 i i 0 ) e y + ( 1 0 0 1) e z] a i Ĥ a j = U 4 (1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1) Ground state: E=-3U/4, J=0, para-positronium τ=125ps E=U/4, J=1, ortho-positronium τ=142ns (U=0.8 mev)

Spin-Orbit coupling Product space of space and spin spanned by Spinor representation Search for eigenstates classified by angular momentum

System 1: Common eigenstates of L 2, L z, Ŝ 2, Ŝ z Possible as [Ŝ i, L j ]=0 Denote states as a,l, m l, s,m s 1 Example

The total angular momentum Ĵ= L+Ŝ Ĵ z = L z +Ŝ z Ĵ 2 = L 2 +Ŝ 2 +2 L z Ŝ z + L + Ŝ - + L - Ŝ + Calculation gives System 1 can not be chosen as eigenstates of Ĵ 2

System 2: Common eigenstates of Ĵ2, Ĵ z, L 2, Ŝ 2 Ĵ z = L z +Ŝ z Ĵ 2 = L 2 +Ŝ2 +2 L z Ŝ z + L + Ŝ - + L - Ŝ + Ĵ 2, Ĵ z, L 2, Ŝ 2 all commute with each other Denote states as a, j, m j,l, s 2 Change of basis Clebsch-Gordan coefficients

Hamiltonian for particle with charge q in electromagnetic fields Lorentz force F =q(e+v B) has no potential V (r) Electrodynamic potentials A(r, t), φ(r, t) with E= φ A/ t B= A Ĥ = ( p q A( r,t )) 2 2m +q φ( r,t) r i and p j satisfy the common commutation relations Two different momenta Canonical momentum p becomes i ħ in spatial representation Kinetic momentum p kin = p q A provides velocity Ψ pkin m Ψ

Free particle with charge q in magnetic field Ĥ = p2 2m B=B e z +q φ( r,t) q 2m B L+ q2 B 2 8m r 2 z-direction separates with eigenstates k>~e ikz Ĥ = p 2 z 2m + p 2 2 x+ p y B 2 2m +q2 8m ( x 2 +ŷ 2 ) q 2m B L z = Ĥ osc with ω=qb /2m =ω L z

Stationary perturbation theory Hamiltonian Ĥ has typically no analytic solution of Ψ Decompose Ĥ =Ĥ 0 + V known eigenstates a 0 Ĥ 0 a 0 =E a 0 a 0 hopefully small Eigenstate form basis Ψ = a c a a 0

Stationary perturbation theory (non-deg.) Eigenvalue problem Expand Choose such that is real. Thus Normalization implies

Non-degenerate eigenvalues E⁰ a Admixure of other states