(a) [15] Use perturbation theory to compute the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of H. Compute all terms up to fourth-order in Ω. The bare eigenstates are

Similar documents
Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

10 Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

I. Perturbation Theory and the Problem of Degeneracy[?,?,?]

Lecture 12. The harmonic oscillator

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd.

Harmonic Oscillator I

Physics 137A Quantum Mechanics Fall 2012 Midterm II - Solutions

PHYS852 Quantum Mechanics II, Spring 2010 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 8: Solutions. Topics covered: hydrogen fine structure

Physics 741 Graduate Quantum Mechanics 1 Solutions to Midterm Exam, Fall x i x dx i x i x x i x dx

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

C. Show your answer in part B agrees with your answer in part A in the limit that the constant c 0.

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 1

4.3 Lecture 18: Quantum Mechanics

Symmetries for fun and profit

Consider Hamiltonian. Since n form complete set, the states ψ (1) and ψ (2) may be expanded. Now substitute (1-5) into Hψ = Eψ,

PH 451/551 Quantum Mechanics Capstone Winter 201x

MATH3383. Quantum Mechanics. Appendix D: Hermite Equation; Orthogonal Polynomials

REVIEW: The Matching Method Algorithm

Problem 1: A 3-D Spherical Well(10 Points)

Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 27 The Variational Method

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 12 Sep 2007

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Final Exam Solutions

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2016 Assignment 3

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Physics 742 Graduate Quantum Mechanics 2 Solutions to Second Exam, Spring 2017

CHAPTER 36. 1* True or false: Boundary conditions on the wave function lead to energy quantization. True

General Exam Part II, Fall 1998 Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Perturbation Theory 1

Two-level systems coupled to oscillators

Math 322. Spring 2015 Review Problems for Midterm 2

Physics 828 Problem Set 7 Due Wednesday 02/24/2010

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Problem Set # 8 Solutions

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19

Phys460.nb Back to our example. on the same quantum state. i.e., if we have initial condition (5.241) ψ(t = 0) = χ n (t = 0)

PHY 407 QUANTUM MECHANICS Fall 05 Problem set 1 Due Sep

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

( ) in the interaction picture arises only

Chapter 6. Q. Suppose we put a delta-function bump in the center of the infinite square well: H = αδ(x a/2) (1)

Solutions Final exam 633

For example, in one dimension if we had two particles in a one-dimensional infinite potential well described by the following two wave functions.

Physics 115C Homework 3

MATH325 - QUANTUM MECHANICS - SOLUTION SHEET 11

The Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Physics Thursday February 21, Problem # 1 (10pts) We are given the operator U(m, n) defined by

Lecture-XXVI. Time-Independent Schrodinger Equation

Physics 221A Fall 2005 Homework 8 Due Thursday, October 27, 2005

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13

Notes on excitation of an atom or molecule by an electromagnetic wave field. F. Lanni / 11feb'12 / rev9sept'14

So far, we considered quantum static, as all our potentials did not depend on time. Therefore, our time dependence was trivial and always the same:

Correlation spectroscopy

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

ψ s a ˆn a s b ˆn b ψ Hint: Because the state is spherically symmetric the answer can depend only on the angle between the two directions.

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

3. Mathematical Properties of MDOF Systems

Physics 115/242 Comparison of methods for integrating the simple harmonic oscillator.

Lecture 3 Dynamics 29

The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation

Section 10: Many Particle Quantum Mechanics Solutions

PHY413 Quantum Mechanics B Duration: 2 hours 30 minutes

1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3

Physics 115C Homework 2

0 belonging to the unperturbed Hamiltonian H 0 are known

440-3 Geometry/Topology: Cohomology Northwestern University Solution of Homework 5

Physics 443, Solutions to PS 2

Each problem is worth 34 points. 1. Harmonic Oscillator Consider the Hamiltonian for a simple harmonic oscillator. 2ml 2 0. d 2

Physics 4022 Notes on Density Matrices

Chapter 2 Approximation Methods Can be Used When Exact Solutions to the Schrödinger Equation Can Not be Found.

The Λ(1405) is an anti-kaon nucleon molecule. Jonathan Hall, Waseem Kamleh, Derek Leinweber, Ben Menadue, Ben Owen, Tony Thomas, Ross Young

1 Heisenberg Representation

Eigenmodes for coupled harmonic vibrations. Algebraic Method for Harmonic Oscillator.

Physics PhD Qualifying Examination Part I Wednesday, August 26, 2015

+E v(t) H(t) = v(t) E where v(t) is real and where v 0 for t ±.

Solution Set of Homework # 6 Monday, December 12, Textbook: Claude Cohen Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Franck Laloë, Second Volume

Lecture 6 Quantum Mechanical Systems and Measurements

Lecture 5: Harmonic oscillator, Morse Oscillator, 1D Rigid Rotor

Degenerate Perturbation Theory. 1 General framework and strategy

Chemistry 532 Problem Set 7 Spring 2012 Solutions

The Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet

The Euclidean Propagator in Quantum Models with Non-Equivalent Instantons

Ph2b Quiz - 2. Instructions

M 340L CS Homework Set 12 Solutions. Note: Scale all eigenvectors so the largest component is +1.

Classical Mechanics Comprehensive Exam

Haydock s recursive solution of self-adjoint problems. Discrete spectrum

Lecture 12: Particle in 1D boxes & Simple Harmonic Oscillator

Time dependent perturbation theory 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 11 May 2012

1 Time-Dependent Two-State Systems: Rabi Oscillations

Chemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):

which implies that we can take solutions which are simultaneous eigen functions of

Path integral in quantum mechanics based on S-6 Consider nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of one particle in one dimension with the hamiltonian:

The Λ(1405) is an anti-kaon nucleon molecule. Jonathan Hall, Waseem Kamleh, Derek Leinweber, Ben Menadue, Ben Owen, Tony Thomas, Ross Young

Mathematical Tripos Part IB Michaelmas Term Example Sheet 1. Values of some physical constants are given on the supplementary sheet

Quantum Mechanics FKA081/FIM400 Final Exam 28 October 2015

Transcription:

PHYS85 Quantum Mechanics II, Spring 00 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 6: Solutions Topics covered: Time-independent perturbation theory.. [0 Two-Level System: Consider the system described by H = δs z + ΩS x, with δ > 0, where S x S z are components of the spin vector of an s = / particle. Treat the S z term as the bare Hamiltonian. (a) [5 Use perturbation theory to compute the eigenvalues eigenvectors of H. Compute all terms up to fourth-order in Ω. The bare eigenstates are with bare eigenvalues we therefore need to iterate the following equations up to j = 4: E (j) n j k= (0) = () (0) = () = δ/ () = δ/ (4) = n (0) V n (j ) E n (k) n(0) n (j k) (5) [ n (j) = n (0) j n (k) n (j k) [ m (0) m (0) V n (j ) j E n (k) m (0) n (j k) E mn E mn k= k= (6) for j = we have for the states we have n () = E () n = Ω n(0) S x n (0) = 0 (7) m (0) Ω m (0) S x n (0) = Ω m (0) (8) E mn E mn () = Ω (9) δ () = Ω (0) δ for j = we have E () n = Ω n(0) S x n () E () n = Ω n(0) S x n () () E () = Ω δ S x = Ω 4δ ()

E () = Ω δ S x = Ω () 4δ for the states [ n () = n (0) n() n () [ m (0) Ω m (0) S x n () E() n m (0) n () E mn E mn = Ω 8δ n(0) For j = we have for the energies (4) E () n = Ω n(0) S x n () E () n n(0) n () E () n n(0) n () = 0 (5) for the states we have n () = [ n(0) n () n () + n () n () [ m (0) Ω m (0) S x n () E() n m (0) n () E() n m (0) n () E mn E mn E mn = [ m (0) Ω 6δ + E() n m (0) n () E mn E mn (6) [ Ω () = 6δ + Ω 8δ = Ω (7) 6δ And finally, for j = 4, we have () = [ Ω 6δ Ω 8δ = Ω (8) 6δ E (4) n = Ω n (0) S x n () E () n n (0) n () E () n n (0) n () E () n n (0) n () for the states, we have = Ω n (0) S x n () + Ω E n () 8δ (9) E (4) = Ω4 δ Ω4 δ = Ω4 6δ (0) E (4) = Ω4 δ + Ω4 δ = Ω4 6δ () n (4) = [ n(0) n () n () + n () n () + n () n () [ m (0) Ω m (0) S x n () E() n m (0) n () E() n m (0) n () E() n m (0) n () E mn E mn E mn E mn = n (0) [ n () n () Ω4 8δ 4 ()

Putting the pieces together gives [ Ω (4) 4 = δ 4 Ω4 8δ 4 = Ω4 () 8δ4 [ Ω (4) 4 = δ 4 Ω4 8δ 4 = Ω4 (4) 8δ4 [ Ω E δ Ω 4δ + Ω4 6δ (5) E δ + Ω 4δ Ω4 6δ (6) 8δ + Ω4 8δ 4 [ Ω δ Ω 6δ + + Ω [ + Ωδ 6δ [ Ω 8δ + Ω4 8δ 4 (b) [5 Exp the exact eigenvalues eigenvectors around Ω = 0 compare to the perturbation theory results. The exact results are E = δ + Ω δ Ω 4δ + Ω4 6δ (9) E = δ + Ω δ + Ω 4δ Ω4 6δ (0) = (δ + (δ + Ω ) Ω (δ + δ + Ω ) + Ω [ Ω 8δ + Ω4 8δ 4 + [ Ωδ + Ω 6δ = ω + (δ + δ + Ω [ ) Ω Ω + (δ + δ + Ω ) δ Ω 6δ + [ Ω 8δ + Ω4 8δ 4 (7) (8) () () (c) [0 Verify that the states computed in (a) are normalized to unity orthogonal up to fourthorder. = = [ Ω 8δ + Ω4 Ω 8δ 4 + [ + Ωδ 6δ + O(Ω 5 ) = Ω 4δ + Ω4 64δ 4 + Ω4 64δ 4 + Ω 4δ Ω4 6δ 4 + O(Ω5 ) = + O(Ω 5 ) () [ Ω δ Ω 6δ + [ Ω 8δ + Ω4 8δ 4 + O(Ω 5 ) = Ω 4δ Ω4 6δ 4 + Ω 4δ + Ω4 64δ 4 + Ω4 64δ 4 + O(Ω5 ) = + O(Ω 5 ) (4) It is clear by inspection of Eqs. (7) (8) that = 0.

. [0 Resonance-frequency shifts: Consider a system with a -dimensional Hilbert space spanned by states a, b, c. In the basis { a, b, c}, let the bare Hamiltonian of the system be H 0 =. (5) For the case where the system is perturbed by the operator 0 V = χ, (6) 0 also given in { a, b, c} basis. Calculate the shifts in the resonance frequencies of the full system relative to those of the unperturbed system, to second-order in χ. The eigenvalues of H 0 are the solutions to det H 0 ω = 0, which yields the characteristic equation which simplifies to ( ω)[( ω)( ω) [ + ω + [ ( ω) = 0 (7) ( ω)ω(ω 4) = 0 (8) so that the eigenvalues of H 0 are = 0, =, = 4. The three bare resonance frequencies are therefore The eigenvectors satisfy taking a n (0) = gives for n =, ω (0) = E(0) ω (0) = E(0) ω (0) = E(0) E(0) n E(0) n E(0) n =, (9) =, (40) = 4. (4) which has the solution b (0) = c (0) = 0, so that a n (0) b n (0) c n (0) = 0 (4) b (0) + c (0) = (4) b (0) + c (0) = (44) (0) = [ a + b (45) for n = the equations are b (0) + c (0) = 0 (46) 4

c (0) = (47) so we see that for n =, we have (0) = [ a b c (48) b (0) + c (0) = (49) b (0) c (0) = (50) (0) = 6 [ a b + c (5) Switching to the bare-eigenstate basis, we have we have from which we can obtain V = H 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 (0) V (0) (0) V (0) (0) V (0) (0) V (0) (0) V (0) (0) V (0) (0) V (0) (0) V (0) (0) V (0) V (0) = χ V (0) = χ V (0) = χ 6 V = χ 0 0 6 (5) (5) (54) (55) 0 0 0 (56) The first-order energy shifts are zero, while the second-order terms are given by (57) E () = V V 4 = χ 6χ 8 = 9χ 4 (58) E () = V V = χ 9χ 6 = 0 (59) E () = V 4 + V = 6χ 8 + 9χ 6 = 9χ 4 (60) 5

Thus the resonance frequency shifts are therefore ω () = E() E () = 9χ 4, (6) ω () = E() E () ω = E() E () = 9χ 4, (6) = 9χ. (6) 6

. [5 Consider a pair of quantum harmonic oscillators, described by the bare Hamiltonian H 0 = ω(a A + /) + Ω(B B + /). Assume that ω < Ω < ω, determine the three lowest bare energy eigenvalues eigenvectors. Consider the perturbation ( ) V = g A A B + B AA. Show that two of the three lowest levels are exact eigenstates of H = H 0 + V. For the remaining bare level, compute the first non-vanishing corrections to the eigenvalue eigenvector. The three lowest energy levels are (0) = 00 with energy = ω+ω, (0) = 0, with energy = ω+ω, (0) = 0 with energy = ω+ω. We have V (0) = 0, V (0) = 0 so that (0) (0) are eigenstates of V with eigenvalue 0. For level we have V (0) = g 0. This means that E () = 0 (64) so that are the first non-vanishing corrections. E () = g (ω Ω) g () = 0 (ω Ω) (65) (66) 7

4. [5 Consider a particle of mass M confined to a -dimensional box of length L. Use perturbation theory to caculate the effects of adding a tilt to the box, represented by adding the linear potenital ( x V tilt (x) = β L ) to the box potential, V box (x) = { 0; 0 < x < L ; else Calculate the three lowest perturbed eigenstates to first-order their corresponding eigenvalues to second-order. We have = π ML (67) As well as V mn = β L = 4 π ML (68) = 9 π ML (69) x (0) = sin(πx/l) (70) L x (0) = sin(πx/l) (7) L x (0) = 0 sin(πx/l) (7) L The first-order energy shifts are all zero because V tile (x) is odd with respect to the center of the box. We will need the matrix elements L ( ) x dx sin(mπx/l) sin(nπx/l) The first-order states are () = () = n (0) = n = β 0 ( dy sin(mπy) y L ) sin(nπy) = 4βmn (( )m+n ) (m n ) π (7) n (0) V n n= E n (0) n (0) n (0) V n n V n E n (0) E e (0) = βml π 4 = βml π 4 8 = 96βML π 4 m (0) m ((m) ) (74) m= m (0) m ((m ) 4) (75) m= m (0) m (m) 9) (76) m=

the corresponding first-order energies are The results are then E () = (0) V () = 8β ML π 6 E () = (0) V () = 5β ML π 6 m= m= E () = (0) V () = 5β ML π 6 (m) ((m) ) 5 = (5 π )β ML 4π 4 (77) (m ) ((m ) 4) 5 = (4π 5)β ML 84π 4 (78) m= (m) ((m) 9) 5 = (9π 5)β ML 944π 4 (79) E π ML (5 π )β ML 4π 4 (80) E 4π ML + (4π 5)β ML 84π 4 (8) E = 9π ML + (9π 5)β ML 944π 4 (8) (0) + βml π 4 m (0) m ((m) ) (8) (0) + βml π 4 (0) + 96βML π 4 m= m (0) m ((m ) 4) (84) m= m (0) m (m) 9) (85) m= 9