Field theory in 18 hours

Similar documents
Attempts at relativistic QM

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz

Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation

3.3 Lagrangian and symmetries for a spin- 1 2 field

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields

Quantization of Scalar Field

Instructor: Sudipta Mukherji, Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar

Quantum Field Theory

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Quantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece

1 Free real scalar field

Maxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

MSci EXAMINATION. Date: XX th May, Time: 14:30-17:00

11 Spinor solutions and CPT

Quantum Field Theory II

2.4 Parity transformation

2 Quantization of the scalar field

CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

3P1a Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 1 Michaelmas 2016

Exercises Symmetries in Particle Physics

Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory

Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books

Maxwell s equations. based on S-54. electric field charge density. current density

Lecture notes for FYS610 Many particle Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

Introduction to Group Theory

Disclaimer. [disclaimer]

Quantization of scalar fields

Week 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field

Particle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet

Physics 218. Quantum Field Theory. Professor Dine. Green s Functions and S Matrices from the Operator (Hamiltonian) Viewpoint

Chapter 17 The bilinear covariant fields of the Dirac electron. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.

Classical Field Theory

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department 8.323: Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I PROBLEM SET 2

Introduction to gauge theory

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12

1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime

Spin one matter elds. November 2015

H =Π Φ L= Φ Φ L. [Φ( x, t ), Φ( y, t )] = 0 = Φ( x, t ), Φ( y, t )

Chapter 10 Operators of the scalar Klein Gordon field. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.

Physics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions

Chapter 1 LORENTZ/POINCARE INVARIANCE. 1.1 The Lorentz Algebra

1.3 Translational Invariance

The Dirac equation. L= i ψ(x)[ 1 2 2

Vector Fields. It is standard to define F µν = µ ϕ ν ν ϕ µ, so that the action may be written compactly as

Lecture 5: Sept. 19, 2013 First Applications of Noether s Theorem. 1 Translation Invariance. Last Latexed: September 18, 2013 at 14:24 1

Loop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51

QM and Angular Momentum

Numerical Methods in Quantum Field Theories

Lecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)

Canonical Quantization C6, HT 2016

What s up with those Feynman diagrams? an Introduction to Quantum Field Theories

Quantum Physics 2006/07

be stationary under variations in A, we obtain Maxwell s equations in the form ν J ν = 0. (7.5)

H&M Chapter 5 Review of Dirac Equation

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

Section 4: The Quantum Scalar Field

Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:

129 Lecture Notes More on Dirac Equation

(a p (t)e i p x +a (t)e ip x p

Quantum Field Theory Spring 2019 Problem sheet 3 (Part I)

The Hamiltonian operator and states

Lecture notes for QFT I (662)

752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian

Lecture 4 - Relativistic wave equations. Relativistic wave equations must satisfy several general postulates. These are;

Quantum Field Theory. and the Standard Model. !H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS MATTHEW D. SCHWARTZ. Harvard University

Week 1, solution to exercise 2

232A Lecture Notes Representation Theory of Lorentz Group

Parity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b)

QFT Perturbation Theory

Physics 557 Lecture 5

The Klein-Gordon equation

Quantum Electrodynamics and the Higgs Mechanism

Quantum Field Theory I

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

Lectures April 29, May

QED and the Standard Model Autumn 2014

Preliminaries: what you need to know

SISSA entrance examination (2007)

The Lorentz and Poincaré groups. By Joel Oredsson

8.323 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I

Dirac Equation. Chapter 1

We start by recalling electrodynamics which is the first classical field theory most of us have encountered in theoretical physics.

Lorentz Invariance and Second Quantization

2 Classical Field Theory

PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS. \Hp. Ni Jun TSINGHUA. Physics. From Quantum Field Theory. to Classical Mechanics. World Scientific. Vol.2. Report and Review in

2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics

Physics 505 Homework No. 8 Solutions S Spinor rotations. Somewhat based on a problem in Schwabl.

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson. Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation. Non-Relativistic QM (Revision)

1.7 Plane-wave Solutions of the Dirac Equation

Quantum Field Theory I

Lecture 4 - Dirac Spinors

Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Physics 513, Quantum Field Theory Homework 4 Due Tuesday, 30th September 2003

Transcription:

Field theory in 18 hours Sudipta Mukherji Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar-751 005, India This is compiled for a short course on Quantum Field Theory in SERC-prep school (2 June - 14 June, 2014, BITS Pilani-Hyderabad Campus). Most of the materials here are shamelessly lifted from the books that are listed at the end. mukherji@iopb.res.in

1 Lorentz and Poincare Lorentz transformation is linear coordinate transformation x µ x µ = Λ µ ν x ν, (1) leaving Group keeping η µν x µ x ν = t 2 x 2 y 2 z 2 invariant. (2) (x 2 1 + x2 2 +...x2 n ) (y2 1 + y2 2 +...y2 m ) (3) is O(m,n). Lorentz group is therefore O(3,1). η µν x µ x ν = ηρσ x ρ x σ (4) gives In matrix notation Taking determinant Λ µ ρλ ν ση µν = η ρσ. (5) Λ T ηλ = η (6) (det Λ) 2 = 1, det Λ = ±1. (7) det Λ = +1 is called proper Lorentz transformation. O(3,1) with det = 1 is SO(3,1). It follows from (5) that (Λ 0 0) 2 3 i=1 (Λ i 0) 2 = 1. So (Λ 0 0) 2 1. Therefore, proper Lorentz transformation has two disconnected components Λ 0 0 1 and Λ 0 0 1. First one is called orthochronous (non for the other) transformation. We see Λ 0 0 1 = [Λ 0 0 1] [(t,x,y,z) ( t,x,y,z)] or [Λ 0 0 1] [(t,x,y,z) ( t, x, y, z)] or [Λ 0 0 1] [(t,x,y,z) ( t, x,y,z)] (8) etc. Namely via time reversal or time reversal plus party transformation or time reversal plus spatial reflection, we go from one to the other. We will consider SO(3,1) with (Λ 0 0) 1. (9) Infinitesimal Lorentz transformation is given by Λ µ ν = δ µ ν + ω µ ν. Using (5), we conclude ω µν = ω νµ (10) Anti-symmetric 4 4 matrix has six independent components: ω 12, ω 23, ω 31 infinitesimal rotation (11) ω 01, ω 02, ω 03 infinitesimal boost, (12) 2

Note, boost along x t = 1 1 v 2 (t + vx), x = 1 (x + vt), 1 < v < 1, (13) 1 v 2 which can as well be written as [ t x ] = [ coshφ sinhφ sinhφ coshφ ] [ t x ] (14) with cosh φ = 1/ 1 v 2. The variable φ is known as rapidity. Since 1 v 1, the Lorentz group is non-compact. A generic element of the group is written as with J µν = J νµ are the six generators. Λ = e i 2 ωµνjµν (15) Consider φ i s, with i = 1,...,n, a basis which transform in the representation R of dimension n of the Lorentz group. ( ) φ i = e i i 2 ωµνjµν R j φj (16) where (e i 2 ωµνjµν ) i j are the n dimensional matrix representation with i,j being the matrix indices. Under infinitesimal transformation: δφ i = i 2 ω µν(j µν R )i j φj. (17) Physical quantities can be classified following their transformation properties under the Lorentz group. Scalar: Remains invariant under Lorentz transformation. Rest mass of a particle is an example. Vector: Contravariant four vector B µ is defined through B µ = Λ µ νb ν. (18) Space-time coordinate x µ with (t, x), momentum p µ with (E,p) are the examples of vectors. We will learn more about it later. Explicit form of generators (J µν ) i j as n n matrices depend on the representation we consider. For scalar φ, index i has one value. So (J µν ) i j is one dimensional matrix. But since δφ = 0, J µν = 0. For four-vector representation, (J µν ) i j are 4 4 matrix. Here (i,j) are Lorentz indices themselves. Explicit form of the matrix is (J µν ) σ ρ = i(ηµσ δρ ν ηνσ δ ρ µ ). (19) 3

To check δb σ = i 2 i(ηµσ δ ν ρ η νσ δ µ ρ)ω µν B ρ = 1 2 (ωσ νb ν ω ν σ B ν ) = 1 2 (ωσ νb ν + ω σ νb ν ) = ω σ νb ν (20) as expected. Use now (19) to show that the Lie algebra of SO(3,1) is: [J µν,j ρσ ] = i(η νρ J µσ η µρ J νσ η νσ J µρ + η µσ J νρ ) (21) Six components of J µν can be re-arranged into two spatial vectors. Define J i = 1 2 ǫijk J jk, K i = J i0. (22) Lie algebra of Lorentz group then gives (use ǫ ijk ǫ ilm = δ jl δ km δ jm δ kl ) [J i,j j ] = iǫ ijk J k [J i,k j ] = iǫ ijk K k [K i,k j ] = iǫ ijk J k. (23) Now J i satisfy angular momentum algebra and the second equation says that the K i transform as spatial vector. Further, introduce θ i = 1 2 ǫijk ω jk,η i = ω i0 to write 1 2 ω µνj µν = ω 12 J 12 + ω 23 J 23 + ω 31 J 31 + ω 10 J 10 + ω 20 J 20 + ω 30 J 30 = i θ i J i i η i K i (24) so that Λ = e iθ.j+iη.k. (25) Spinor representation Recalling SU(2) Group SU(2) consists of 2 2 complex matrices U with U U = 1, det U = 1. (26) Writing [ a b c d ], (27) 4

unitarity gives d = a,b = c and aa bb = 1, leaving three independent real parameters. Acts on a basis ξ = (ξ 1,ξ 2 ) T as ξ 1 = aξ 1 + bξ 2,ξ 2 = b ξ 1 + a ξ 2. (28) A SU(2) transformation on ξ i,i = 1,2 SO(3) transformation on x i,i = 1,2,3 if we identify x = 1 2 (ξ2 2 ξ 2 1), y = 1 2i (ξ2 2 + ξ 2 1), z = ξ 1 ξ 2. (29) Show using the above relations, under SU(2) x = 1 2 (a2 + a 2 b 2 b 2 )x i 2 (a2 a 2 + b 2 b 2 )y (ab + a b )z y = i 2 (a2 a 2 b 2 + b 2 )x + 1 2 (a2 + a 2 + b 2 + b 2 )y i(ab a b )z z = (ab + ba )x + i(ba ab )y + (aa bb )z. (30) Suppose we choose a = e i 2 θ,b = 0, obeying aa bb = 1. We get x = x cos θ + y sin θ,y = x sin θ + y cos θ, z = z. (31) This leads to a correspondence between SU(2) and SO(3) matrices and or in other words, between [ e i 2 θ 0 c e i 2 θ ] cos θ sin θ 0 sin θ cos θ 0 0 0 1 e i 2 σ3 θ Here σ 3 is one of the Pauli matrices. We use for Pauli matrices [ ] [ ] [ σ 1 0 1 =,σ 2 0 i =,σ 3 1 0 = 1 0 i 0 0 1, (32), (33) and e ijzθ. (34) ]. (35) Check that σ i /2 satisfies a similar commutation relation as J i [ σi 2, σj 2 ] = iǫijk σk 2. (36) That the SU(2) and the SO(3) have the same algebra means that they are indistinguishable at the level of infinitesimal transformation. However they differ globally, far away from the 5

identity. Note while SU(2) is periodic under 4π rotation, and for SO(3) the period is 2π. (32) changes sign under θ θ +2π but (33) does not. Does this remind you the property of a particle with 1/2 integer spin? Representations of SU(2) are labeled by j values 0, 1/2, 1, 3/2... while for SO(3) they are spaced by integers. Spin j representation has dimension 2j + 1 where various states within it are labeled by j z which takes values from j,...,+j. j = 1/2 is called spinorial representation and has dimension 2. It is the fundamental representation. Rest can be constructed with tensor products of spinors. Let us now focus on the Lorentz algebra. Define With this, (23) becomes J ± = J ± ik. (37) 2 [J + i,j +j ] = iǫ ijk J + k [J i,j j ] = iǫ ijk J k [J + i,j j ] = 0. (38) We get two copies of angular momentum algebra. We therefore find that the representation of Lorentz algebra can be labeled by two half-integers (j,j + ) with dimension of representation (2j + 1)(2j + + 1). (0,0) representation: It has dimension one. On it J ± = 0. Therefore, J,K are zero. Hence it is scalar representation. (1/2,0) and (0,1/2) representation: It has dimension 2, and spin 1/2. So they are the spinorial representation. We write (ψ L ) α for α = 1,2 a spinor in (1/2,0) and (ψ R ) α for (0,1/2). The ψ L is called the left-handed Weyl spinor, and the ψ R is called the right-handed Weyl spinor For (1/2,0),J is represented by 2 2 matrix while J + = 0. The solution in terms of 2 2 matrix of (38) is J = σ 2, J+ = 0; J = J + + J = σ 2, K = i(j+ J ) = iσ 2. (39) Now using (25) ψ L Λ L ψ L = e ( iθ η). σ 2 ψl. (40) For ψ R, for (0,1/2) representation, J = σ/2 and K = iσ/2. So, ψ R Λ R ψ R = e ( iθ+η). σ 2 ψr. (41) Charge conjugation: Show, using σ 2 σ i σ 2 = σ i, that σ 2 ψ L transforms as is a right handed Weyl spinor. 6

Though the physical meaning of charge conjugation will be discussed later, it is an action which transforms ψ L to a new spinor ψ c L = iσ 2 ψ L. (42) Taking on both sides, and calling ψ c L ψ R and ψ c R ψ L, we further get ψ c R = iσ2 ψ R. (43) Note that (ψ c L) c = (iσ 2 ψ L) c = iσ 2 (iσ 2 ψ L) = ψ L. (44) Field Representation Field is a function of space-time with definite transformation properties under Lorentz group. Let a generic field φ(x) transforms to φ (x ) under Lorentz transformation. The on φ means the change in the functional form. Scalar field: φ (x ) = φ(x). (45) Take a point P with coordinate x in one reference frame and x in the Lorentz transformed frame. Functional form of a scalar field changes in such a way that the numerical value remains unchanged. Consider with (J µν ) ρ σ = i(ηµρ δσ ν ηνρ δ σ µ ). By definition, for scalar, x ρ = x ρ + δx ρ = x ρ + ω ρ σx σ (46) δφ = φ (x ) φ(x) = 0. (47) But the change of the field at fixed coordinate is non-zero. Calling δφ = φ (x) φ(x), we get So φ (x) = φ(x δx) = φ(x) δx ρ ρ φ. (48) δφ = φ (x) φ(x) = δx ρ ρ φ = i 2 ω µν(j µν ) ρ σ xσ ρ φ = i.i 2 ω µν(η µρ δ ν σ η νρ δ µ σ)x σ ρ φ = i.i 2 ω µν(x µ ν x ν µ )φ = i 2 ω µνl µν φ. (49) 7

Here L µν = i(x µ ν x ν µ )φ. (50) Check that L µν satisfy the algebra in (21). Recognizing i µ = p µ, we see L µν = (x µ p ν x ν p µ ). Note that the spatial components L i = 1/2ǫ ijk L jk = ǫ ijk x i p j are the components of orbital angular momentum. Weyl field: We saw before According to our definition ψ L (x ) = Λ L ψ L (x), ψ R (x ) = Λ R ψ R (x). (51) δψ L (x) = ψ L (x) ψ L(x). (52) This is equal to = Λ L ψ L (x δx) ψ L (x) = Λ L [ψ L (x) δx ρ ρ ψ L ] ψ L (x) Λ L ψ L (x) δx ρ ρ ψ L ψ L = (Λ L 1)ψ L δx ρ ρ ψ L. (53) Therefore δψ L = (Λ L 1)ψ L (x) δx ρ ρ ψ L (54) The last part is exactly like the scalar one. We write For the first part, we introduce S µν such that δx ρ ρ ψ L = i 2 ω µνl µν ψ L. (55) (Λ L 1)ψ L (x) = (1 i 2 ω µνs µν 1)ψ L (x). (56) such that δψ L = i 2 ω µνj µν ψ L, (57) where J µν = L µν + S µν. With this, Comparing Λ L with (40), we can determine S µν. Λ L = e i 2 ωµνsµν. (58) Λ L = e ( iθ η) σ 2 = e ( iω12 σ 3 iω 23 σ 1 iω 31 σ 2 ω i0 σ i )/2 = e ( iω 12σ 3 iω 23 σ 1 iω 31 σ 2 +ω i0 σ i )/2 = e iω 12S 12 iω 23 S 23 iω 31 S 31 iω i0 S i0. (59) giving (58). Here, we have written S 12 = σ3 2,S23 = σ1 2,S31 = σ2 2,Si0 = iσi 2. (60) 8

Like the orbital angular momentum L i, defined previously, we write the spin angular momentum as S i = 1 2 ǫijk S jk = σi 2. (61) Similarly, for the right handed Weyl fermion, show that Dirac Field: Λ R = e i 2 ωµνsµν, with S i = 1 2 ǫijk S jk = σi 2, but Si0 = iσi 2. (62) Under parity transformation (t, x) (t, x), K K, J J. (63) Therefore, parity transformation exchanges J ± and hence j ±. Consequently, (j,j + ) representation of Lorentz group is not at the same time a basis of parity transformation unless j = j +. To describe parity preserving interactions (electromagnetic and strong), it is often convenient to work with fields which provide representations of both Lorentz and parity transformations. We therefore define Dirac field as Ψ = [ ψl ψ R ]. (64) Under Lorentz and parity, it transforms respectively as [ ] Ψ (x ΛL 0 ) = Ψ(x), and Ψ (x ) = 0 Λ R Note that Dirac field has four complex components. [ 0 1 1 0 ] Ψ(x). (65) Charge conjugation of Dirac field is defined through charge conjugated Weyl field as [ ] [ ] Ψ c iσ (x) = 2 ψr 0 σ iσ 2 ψl = i 2 σ 2 Ψ (66) 0 Check that (Ψ c ) c = Ψ. Vector field: A contravariant vector field B µ transform under Lorentz transformation as B µ (x ) = Λ µ νb ν (x). (67) Vector field belongs to (j,j + ) = (1/2,1/2) representation. Since j = j +, it is also a basis for the representation of parity transformation. An example of vector field is the gauge field A µ in electromagnetism. 9

Poincare group or the inhomogeneous Lorentz group is formed by translation x µ x µ + a µ along with the Lorentz group. Generator of translation is the momentum operator P µ and a generic element of the translation group is written as e ip µ a µ. Since two translations commute Using known relations show that [P µ,p ν ] = 0. (68) [J i,p j ] = iǫ ijk P k, [J i,p 0 ] = 0, (69) [P µ,j ρσ ] = i(η µρ P σ η µσ P ρ ). (70) Lorentz algebra along with (68) and (70) defined Poincare algebra. From here it follows that [K i,h] = ip i where P 0 = H is the Hamiltonian. Since K i does not commute with the Hamiltonian, a state can not be labeled by the eigen value of K i. We have already discussed the representation of Lorentz group on fields. In order to know the representation of Poincare group on fields, we need to find a way to represent the fourmomentum operator P µ. This means that we will have to specify the transformation properties of the fields under translation. We would require all fields to be scalars under translation. That is φ (x ) = φ(x). (71) Consider infinitesimal translation x µ = x µ + ǫ µ. Then So P µ = i µ. φ (x) = φ(x δx) φ(x) ǫ µ µ φ = e ip µ ǫ µ φ. (72) Using [ µ,x ν ] = η µν, show that indeed (70) is satisfied. 2 Classical Fields Suppose we are working with a non-relativistic system of particles. We identify a set of coordinates q i (t). This, together with the velocities q i (t), describe the system. First, we construct the Lagrangian L and the action S S = t2 t 1 dt L(q i (t), q i (t)). (73) Setting the variation of the action to zero, we end up with the Euler-Lagrange equation. Defining the momentum conjugate to q i as d ( L ) L = 0. (74) dt q i q i p i = L q i, (75) 10

we construct the Hamiltonian H = i p i q i L. (76) When we construct respective Lagrangian and the action for the fields, we simply replace q i (t) φ(t,x), q i (t) µ φ(t,x). (77) (Thinking of an one dimensional system of particles connected by springs might be useful here. At time t, let the transverse displacement of the ith particle is given by q i (t). When the number of particles increases, we represent the displacement profile of the particles by a continuous function φ(t,x) rather than all q i s together.) The Lagrangian has a general form L = d 3 x L(φ, µ φ), (78) where L is called the Lagrangian density. Action is analogously constructed as S = dt L = d 4 xl(φ, µ φ). (79) For point particles, we consider the time integral between two values t 1 and t 2, but here we will be mostly interested in situations where the integral extends over the whole space-time. We will always assume that the fields decrease sufficiently fast so that the boundary terms can be neglected. We define the classical dynamics again by extremizing the action. This leads to the equation of motion ( L ) µ L ( µ φ) φ = 0 (80) The conjugate four-momentum is defined by Π µ = L ( µ φ), (81) and the Hamiltonian density as H(x) = Π 0 0 φ(x) L. (82) Noether s theorem A transformation φ(x) φ (x) = φ(x) + δφ(x) is called a symmetry transformation if it changes the Lagrangian density by a total divergence. Noether s theorem says: If under a continuous infinitesimal transformation φ(x) φ (x) = φ(x) + δφ(x), the change in the Lagrangian density is found to be of the form δl = µ W µ (x) (83) 11

without using the equations of motion, then there exists a current density j µ (x) = Π µ δφ(x) W µ (x) (84) which, for field obeying equations of motion, satisfies µ j µ = 0. (85) To prove, we first consider arbitrary change in the field δφ not necessarily coming from the symmetry transformation. Change in the Lagrangian density is δl = L φ δφ + L µ φ) ( µ φ) δ( = L φ δφ + Π µ µ ( δφ) = µ (Π µ δφ) + ( L φ µπ µ) δφ. (86) Now if the above is restricted to symmetry transformation, δl = µ W µ. Then by construction, upon using the equations of motion (in that case, the expression inside the big brackets goes to zero), µ (Π µ δφ W µ ) = 0. (87) Example: Consider translation We have seen before x µ x = x µ + ǫ µ. (88) δφ(x) = ǫ µ µ φ. (89) For simplicity, we will choose ǫ µ to have only one non-vanishing component, say ǫ α. So that δφ(x) = α φ. We have dropped an overall constant as j µ is defined only up to a constant. Further δ µ φ = δ α µ φ. Assuming L does not depend on x explicitly, we have Therefore and the Noether current is δl = L φ α φ + L ( µ φ) α µ φ = α L = µ (η µα L). (90) W µα = η µα L (91) T µα = Π µ α φ(x) η µα L. (92) This is called the energy-momentum tensor. By construction, when φ satisfies the equation of motion µ T µα = 0. (93) 12

From here, it follows that the four momentum P α = d 3 xt 0α (94) is conserved. That is Real scalar field dp α dt = 0. (95) To construct a Poincare invariant action, we start with the simplest one involving a real scalar field φ. In order to describe non-trivial dynamics, the action must contain µ φ. To make it Lorentz invariant we need to contract the index µ. Easy way to do this is to multiply it with µ φ. We therefore consider S = 1 d 4 x( µ φ µ φ m 2 φ 2 ). (96) 2 Here m is the rest mass of the particle as we will soon see. Euler-Lagrange equation gives The plane wave e ipx is a solution if ( + m 2 )φ = 0, = µ µ. (97) p 2 = m 2, or (p 0 ) 2 p 2 = m 2, (98) justifying the association of m with the rest mass of a free particle. Since φ is real, we write the general solution as a real superposition of plane waves: φ(x) = d 3 p (2π) 3 2E p (a p e ipx + a p eipx ) p 0 =E p. (99) Here E p = + p 2 + m 2. Note that it has both positive (e iept ) and negative (e +iept ) frequency modes. Momentum conjugate to φ is Π 0 = L ( 0 φ) = 0φ. (100) Hamiltonian is therefore H = d 3 xh = 1 2 d 3 x[(π 0 ) 2 + ( φ) 2 + m 2 φ 2 ]. (101) Complex scalar Two real scalar fields of same mass m can be assembled into a single complex scalar field as φ = 1 2 (φ 1 + iφ 2 ) (102) 13

and the action can be written as S = S φ1 + S φ2 = d 4 x( µ φ µ φ m 2 φ φ) (103) Since we now give up the reality condition, we write the solution as where a p,b p are independent. φ(x) = d 3 p (2π) 3 2E p (a p e ipx + b pe ipx ) p 0 =E p, (104) This action has a global U(1) symmetry φ e iθ φ,φ e iθ φ. The corresponding Noether current is j µ = Π µ δφ + Π µδφ, since W µ = 0. (105) A simple computation gives j µ = i(φ µ φ φ µ φ ) = iφ µ φ (106) and the corresponding conserved charge is Q = d 3 xj 0 = i d 3 xφ 0 φ (107) Spinor Weyl equation First we define σ µ = (1,σ i ), and σ µ = (1, σ i ). (108) Now we can show that ψ L σµ ψ L and ψ R σµ ψ R transform as vectors under Lorentz transformation. For the purpose of illustration, let us consider the second one for non-zero boost parameter η 1. Therefore the time-like component transform as ψ R σµ ψ R ψ R eη1 σ 1 /2 σ µ e η1 σ 1 /2 ψ R. (109) ψ R σ0 ψ R ψ R (coshη1 2 + σ1 sinh η1 2 )(coshη1 2 + σ1 sinh η1 2 )ψ R = coshη 1 ψ R ψ R + sinhη 1 ψ R σ1 ψ R. (110) Similarly, it is easy to show ψ R σ1 ψ R sinhη 1 ψ R ψ R + coshη 1 ψ R σ1 ψ R, (111) and the other components remain unchanged. This shows that ψ R σµ ψ R transform as a vector under boost with η 1. For a general Lorentz transformation, the change can be easily worked out. We then construct scalar bilinears for the Lagrangian density L L = iψ L σµ µ ψ L, L R = iψ R σµ µ ψ R. (112) 14

The i factors in front make the action real. Euler-Lagrange equation following from L L is Note therefore, 2 0 ψ L = σ i i σ j j ψ L = 2 i ψ L. Hence ( 0 σ i i )ψ L = 0. (113) ψ L = 0. (114) This is a massless Klein Gordon equation. However, the first order differential equation gives us more information about ψ L. Consider the positive energy plane wave solution ψ L = u L e ipx = u L e iet+ipi x i where u L is a constant spinor. From (113), we get p i σ i E u L = p σ E u L = u L. (115) Now since, from (114), E = p and the angular momentum is J = σ/2, we conclude (ˆp J)u L = 1 2 u L, with ˆp = p p. (116) The projection of spin along the direction of the momentum is known as helicity. We say that the left-handed massless Weyl spinor has helicity h = 1/2. Show that the energy-momentum tensor is given by T µν = iψ L σµ ν ψ L. (117) Note that L L does not change under global U(1) transformation ψ L e iθ ψ L. The Noether current and charge respectively are j µ = ψ L σµ ψ L, Q = d 3 xψ L ψ L. (118) Repeat all these computations for ψ R. In particular, show that for ψ R, the positive energy solution has helicity h = +1/2. Dirac equation First, note that since Λ L Λ R = Λ R Λ L = 1, ψ L ψ R and ψ R ψ L behave as scalars under Lorentz transformation. Further the combination ψ L ψ R + ψ R ψ L is also invariant under parity transformation. Therefore, we can construct a Lagrangian density which is scalar under Lorentz and parity transformation as: L D = iψ L σµ µ ψ L + iψ R σµ µ ψ R m(ψ L ψ R + ψ R ψ L). (119) Note that under parity, ψ L ψ R and i i. So the first two terms get interchanged. We now define Dirac spinor as before Ψ = [ ψl ψ R ] (120) 15

and introduce to re-write (119) as γ µ = [ 0 σ µ σ µ 0 ], (121) L D = Ψ(iγ µ µ m)ψ, (122) with Ψ = Ψ γ 0. It would be useful to note that the γ matrices satisfy {γ µ,γ ν } = 2η µν. (123) At this stage, we also define γ 5 = iγ 0 γ 1 γ 2 γ 3. In matrix form [ ] γ 5 1 0 =. (124) 0 1 Therefore (1 ± γ 5 )/2 act as projectors on the Weyl spinors. 1 γ 5 [ ] ψl Ψ =, (125) 2 0 and [ 1 + γ 5 0 Ψ = 2 ψ R ], (126) In future discussions, in many occasions, a general four vector B µ will appear in a combination γ µ B µ. We will write it as B. Therefore γ µ µ =. Varying Ψ, we get the Dirac equation (i m)ψ = 0 (127) Show that from here it follows ( + m 2 )ψ L/R = 0. (128) Therefore the Dirac equation implies massive Klein-Gordon equations for ψ L, and ψ R. A general solution of Dirac equation is a superposition of plane waves Ψ(x) = u(p)e ipx, and Ψ(x) = v(p)e ipx, (129) where v(p), u(p) are four component spinors. Upon Substitution in Dirac equation, plane waves give We write u(p) as ( p m)u(p) = 0 ( p + m)v(p) = 0. (130) u(p) = [ ul (p) u R (p) ] (131) and first take the case m 0. In the rest frame of the particle p µ = (m,0,0,0), the first of the (130) equations reduces to (γ 0 1)u(p) = 0. (132) 16

This only means u L = u R. Further from (128), we get the mass-shell condition p 2 = m 2. We choose u L = u R = mξ where the two component spinor ξ satisfies ξ ξ = 1. For general p, we can simply boost the above solution. It goes as follows. Consider a boost along the 3rd direction (alternatively the z direction). However, we note u L (p ) = e η3 σ 3 2 u L (p) cosh η 3 = cosh η3 2 = sinh η3 2 = = (cosh η3 2 σ3 sinh η3 2 )u L(p). (133) 1 = 1 (p3 ) 2 1 v 2 1 + cosh η 3 = 2 1 + cosh η 3 2 m 2 = E m E + m 2m = E m 2m. (134) In the above, we have used p 3 = mv 3 / 1 v 2. So However, since we can express u L(p ) = ( E + m 2m σ3 E m) u L (p). (135) 2m ( E + p 3 + E p 3 ) 2 = 2(E + m), ( E + p 3 E p 3 ) 2 = 2(E m), (136) ( u L(p E + p ) = 3 (1 σ 3 ) E p 2 + 3 (1 + σ 3 )) m 2 u L (p). (137) m Similarly from the transformation property of u R, we find ( u E + p R (p ) = 3 (1 + σ 3 ) E p 2 + 3 (1 σ 3 )) m 2 u R (p). (138) m So the complete solution is (removing the s for notational simplicity): u s (p) = ) E p 2 + 3 (1+σ 3 ) 2 ξ s ) E p 3 (1 σ 3 ) ξ s ( E+p 3 (1 σ 3 ) ( E+p 3 (1+σ 3 ) 2 + Index s stands for the two independent solutions [ ] ξ 1 1 =, ξ 2 = 0 [ 0 1 2 ]. (139). (140) 17

For v(p), we note that in rest frame (γ 0 + 1)v(p) = 0, giving v L = v R. So the general solution is: ( ) E+p 3 (1 σ 3 ) E p v s 2 + 3 (1+σ 3 ) 2 η s (p) = ( ), (141) E+p 3 (1+σ 3 ) E p 2 + 3 (1 σ 3 ) 2 η s where η 1 = [ 1 0 ], η 2 = [ 0 1 ]. (142) In the limit when m goes to zero, p µ = (E,0,0,E). We get u 1 (p) = 2E [ 0 ξ 1 ], u 2 (p) = 2E [ ξ 2 0 ], (143) and so on. Taking the hermitian conjugate of (130), we also get ū(p)( p m) = 0 v(p)( p m) = 0. (144) Chiral symmetry In the absence of the mass term, the Dirac Lagrangian has a global symmetry ψ L e iθ L ψ L, ψ R e iθ R ψ R. (145) This is a U(1) U(1) symmetry. When θ L = θ R = α, we can write the transformations in terms of the Dirac spinor Ψ e iα Ψ. (146) The transformation with θ R = θ L = β can be written as The conserved currents for the first is called vector current as Ψ e iαγ5 Ψ. (147) j µ V = Ψγ µ Ψ (148) since it transforms like a vector under Lorentz transformation. The second is the axial vector current as j µ A = Ψγ µ γ 5 Ψ. (149) This transforms as an axial vector under Lorentz transformation. Show Ψγ µ Ψ and Ψγ µ γ 5 Ψ indeed behave as vector and axial vector under Lorentz transformation. When we turn on the mass term in the Dirac equation, the symmetry under the transformation with θ L = θ R survives while the axial U(1) breaks. 18

Vector: The Electromagnetic field The electromagnetic field is described by a four-vector A µ. First we construct the field strength F µν = µ A ν ν A µ (150) Components of the field strength gives the electric (E i ) and the magnetic fields (B i ), namely, F 0i = E i, F ij = ǫ ijk B k. (151) We now want to construct a Lagrangian such that the Maxwell equations are reproduced. The one which does that is given by Varying A µ, we get the equations of motion L = 1 4 F µνf µν = 1 2 (E2 B 2 ). (152) µ F µν = 0 (153) If we further define F µν = 1 2 ǫµνρσ F ρσ (154) then because of the antisymmetric nature of ǫ µνρσ, µ F µν = 0. (155) Show that from (153) and (155), the Maxwell equations follow. Gauge invariance: Coulomb and Lorentz gauge E = 0, B = 0 E (156) B = 0, E = 0 B (157) We note that the Lagrangian remains unchanged under gauge transformation: A µ A µ (x) = A µ µ θ(x), (158) where θ is an arbitrary smooth function of t,x. This means that A µ gives a redundant description of the theory. Or, in other words, Lagrangian is telling us that there are too many of A µ s which are physically equivalent. We need to remove this redundancy or this over counting. First consider taking t θ = dt A 0 (x,t ), (159) 19

This makes A 0 (x) = 0 but of course changes A i. Note that we can make a further gauge transformation as long as A 0 (x) = 0 remains unchanged. This is trivially done by choosing θ to be independent of time. We choose θ (x) = d 3 y A i (y,t) 4π x y y i (160) and new gauge field is therefore A µ = A µ µ θ. Though we see explicit time-dependence in the right hand side, θ is actually time independent. This follows from the equations of motion. Note that since A 0 has been set to zero, Ei = 0 A i. Then the Maxwell equation i E i = 0 says 0 i A i = 0. Therefore 0 θ (x) = 0. Further, note that To derive the this result, we used the identity So using the gauge freedom, we have reached A = A 2 θ = 0. (161) ( 2 1 ) x = 4πδ 3 (x y). (162) x y A 0 = 0, A = 0. (163) This is called Coulomb or radiation gauge. This gauge implies Lorentz gauge µ A µ = 0. (164) However, in Lorentz gauge, part of gauge redundancy is still left. In this gauge, Therefore the equations of motion reduce to µ ( µ A ν ν A µ ) = µ µ A ν ν µ A µ = µ µ A ν. (165) A ν = 0. (166) What we got is a massless Klein-Gordon equation. To have a better understanding of the gauge fixing process, let us look at the plane wave solution of the above equation. A µ (x) ǫ µ (k)e ikx (167) plus its complex conjugate. The ǫ µ is known as the polarization vector. From (166), we get k 2 = 0. Further, (163) gives ǫ 0 = 0, ǫ k = 0. (168) We see that A µ has two degrees of freedom given by the two polarization vectors in a plane transverse to the direction of the propagation. Coupling gauge field with matter When we add an external current term in electromagnetism, we know that the first line of the Maxwell equations in (157) gets modified. The second line, which follows from the antisymmetric property of F µν, remains unchanged. The first pair becomes µ F µν = j ν. (169) 20

The property µ ν F µν = 0 then tells us that j ν has to be conserved, The action that produces (169) as the equations of motion is S = ν j ν = 0. (170) d 4 x( 1 4 F µνf µν + j µ A µ ). (171) Under a gauge transformation, S S d 4 xj µ µ θ = S + d 4 x( µ j µ )θ. (172) Therefore, if we insist on the gauge invariance of the action, we get the conservation of the current as in (170). This is the first simple example of how gauge invariance works as a guiding principle in building up theory of fundamental interactions. We will now try to construct some explicit gauge invariant actions. We have seen before that the Dirac action has a global U(1) symmetry Ψ e iqθ Ψ. (173) For the moment, we take q to be a number. Suppose we make θ a function of x. This turns the global U(1) to a local U(1) transformation. Clearly Dirac action in its present form is not invariant as µ Ψ does not transform to e iqθ(x) µ Ψ under local U(1). However, if we modify the derivative to a covariant derivative as then under the local U(1) µ Ψ D µ Ψ = ( µ + iqa µ )Ψ, (174) D µ Ψ D µ e iqθ(x) Ψ = e iqθ µ Ψ + iq µ θe iqθ Ψ + iqa µ e iqθ Ψ. (175) But notice, since the free electromagnetic field is invariant under A µ A µ µ θ, we can absorb the piece iq µ θe iqθ Ψ by making a gauge transformation. Therefore, we conclude that under combined gauge and local U(1) transformation, the covariant derivative transforms as Therefore the Lagrangian D µ Ψ e iqθ(x) D µ Ψ. (176) L = 1 4 F µνf µν + Ψ(iγ µ D µ m)ψ = 1 4 F µνf µν + Ψ(iγ µ µ m)ψ qa µ Ψγ µ Ψ (177) is invariant under local U(1) transformation. This is also known in literature as gauging a U(1) symmetry. The conserved current under global U(1) was j µ V = Ψγ µ Ψ. By making U(1) local, we have introduced a coupling A µ j µ V. 21

We can repeat the same exercise for the complex scalar field. If we want to make the transformation φ e iqθ φ a local symmetry of the Lagrangian, we simply replace µ by D µ. L = µ φ µ φ m 2 φ φ 1 4 F µνf µν (D µ φ) D µ φ m 2 φ φ 1 4 F µνf µν = µ φ µ φ iqa µ (φ µ φ φ µ φ ) + q 2 φ φa µ A µ m 2 φ φ 1 4 F µνf µν. (178) Again we see that by making U(1) local, we have introduced a coupling between the gauge field and the global U(1) current. Of course there is an extra term in the Lagrangian. But this term actually plays an important role in the Higgs mechanism. 3 Free field quantization Scalar field Like in quantum mechanics, we canonically quantize a theory by promoting a field to an operator and imposing nontrivial commutations relation between the field and its conjugate momentum. In Heisenberg picture, where the operators depend on time, we impose the commutation relation at equal time. [φ(t,x),π(t,y)] = iδ 3 (x y). (179) For notational simplicity we have written Π 0 = Π. Note that both the sides transform similarly under Lorentz transformation. Though φ is a scalar, Π = 0 φ transforms as the time component of a four vector. Therefore whole of the left hand side transforms as the time component. Now since d 4 xδ 3 (x y) = dt, and d 4 x is Lorentz invariant (Show), δ 3 (x y) transforms as the time-component of a four vector as well. Promoting φ to an operator is straightforward. We take equation (99) and promote a p to an operator. Then a p becomes the hermitian conjugate a p. φ(x) = d 3 p (2π) 3 2E p (a p e ipx + a p eipx ) p 0 =E p. (180) The relation (179), turns into a relations between a p and its hermitian conjugate. The calculation is straightforward but somewhat tedious. The following relations will help. i a p = d 3 xe ipx 0 φ (181) 2Ep a p = i 2Ep d 3 xe ipx 0 φ. (182) To derive this you may also need to use (2π) 3 δ 3 (p q) = d 3 xe i(p q) x. (183) 22

Further noticing Π = 0 φ one finally arrives at Rest of the commutators between operators vanish. [a p,a q ] = (2π)3 δ 3 (p q). (184) It is convenient sometime to put the system into a large box of size L with total volume V = L 3. This regularizes the divergences coming from the infinite volume and is known as infrared regularization. In this situation p i takes only discrete values (2π/L)n i with n i = 0, ±1, ±2,... Therefore the momentum integral turns into a sum. ( (2π) ) 3 d 3 p. (185) L Since d 3 pδ 3 (p q) = 1, This implies n ( L ) 3δp,q δ 3 (p q) =. (186) 2π δ 3 (p = 0) = V (2π) 3. (187) Comparing with the annihilation and creation operators a,a of harmonic oscillator, we see from (184) that the real scalar field is equivalent to a collection of oscillators, one for each value of p. The construction of the Fock space therefore is analogous. We first define the vacuum state as a p 0 = 0, (188) for all p. A general state is obtained by acting creations operators on the vacuum state. p 1 p 2...p 3 = (2E p1 ) 1 2(2E p2 ) 1 2...(2E pn ) 1 2a p 1 a p 2...a p n 0. (189) We can also construct a n-particle state of momentum p We find that the norm of the one-particle state is pp...p = (2E p ) n 2 (a p ) n 0, (190) p 1 p 2 = (2E p1 ) 1 2(2E p2 ) 1 2 0 a p1 a p 2 0 = 2E p1 (2π) 3 δ 3 (p 1 p 2 ). (191) The normalizations have been chosen such that combination E p1 δ 3 (p 1 p 2 ) appears on the right hand side. You are now asked to show that this combination is actually Lorentz invariant. The Hamiltonian can be easily written down in terms of a p and a p. Using (101) and (180) and skipping the details, we get d 3 p H = 2(2π) 3 E p(a p a p + a p a p ) = d 3 p (2π) 3 E p(a p a p + 1 2 [a p,a p ]). (192) The second term is the zero point energy of all the oscillators and actually gives a divergent contribution to the Hamiltonian. The integrand is (2π) 3 δ 3 (0) which contribute V at finite volume. The zero point energy is therefore V 2 d 3 p (2π) 3 E p. (193) 23

This is a divergent at large p since E p p. However, since in the following, we mostly measure the energy difference, we will simply discard this infinite contribution to the energy and will take our Hamiltonian to be d 3 p H = (2π) 3E pa p a p. (194) This is commonly known as the normal ordering. Given an operator O, we denote the normal ordered operator as : O : by bringing all the creation operators to the left of all the annihilation operators. For example : a p a p := a pa p. Therefore we say that (194) is obtained by normal ordering the Hamiltonian in (101). Now since a pa p is the number operator, the energy of a general Fock state is given by H p 1...p n = (E p1 +... + E pn ) p 1...p n. (195) Further, from T 0i, which was computed earlier for the scalar field, we can write down the spatial momentum associated with this states. First P i = d 3 x : T 0i := d 3 x : 0 φ i φ :. (196) Using (180), we get P i = d 3 p (2π) 3 pi a pa p. (197) Hence, for example, a p 0 is a state of momentum p with energy E p = (p 2 + m 2 ) 1/2. We conclude this section by pointing out that a general multi-particle state is symmetric under particle exchange as a ps commute among each other. So it obeys Bose-Einstein statistics. Further, since the spin operator S µν, discussed earlier, is zero for the scalars, the quanta of the scalar field (a p) has zero spin. Complex scalar and Free complex scalar field has the plane wave expansion as d 3 p φ(x) = (2π) 3 (a p e ipx + b 2E pe ipx ) (198) p φ (x) = The canonical commutation relation (179) gives Rest are all zero. We define the vacuum state as d 3 p (2π) 3 2E p (a p eipx + b p e ipx ) (199) [a p,a q] = [b p,b q] = (2π) 3 δ 3 (p q). (200) a p 0 = b p 0 = 0. (201) We generate the Fock space by acting a p,b p on 0. Normal ordered Hamiltonian and momentum are now d 3 p H = (2π) 3E p(a pa p + b pb p ), P i d 3 p = (2π) 3pi (a pa p + b pb p ). (202) 24

The U(1) charge has been constructed earlier. It is given by Q = i φ 0 φd 3 x. (203) Show that in terms of operators a p and b p Q = d 3 p (2π) 3 (a p a p b p b p). (204) Note that the ordering of the operator is correct as the charge of the vacuum has to vanish. The U(1) charge carried by a general Fock state is the difference between the number of quanta created by a p and b p (integrated over all momenta). Now we see that the state a p 0 represents a particle with mass m, momentum p, spin zero and charge Q = 1. The state b p 0 has all same but the charge is opposite. We call this quanta an antiparticle (of a ). We see that in the expansion of φ, the coefficient of the positive energy solution e ipx becomes annihilation operator of a particle and the coefficient of the negative energy solution e ipx becomes a creation operator of an antiparticle. For a real scalar field Q is zero, since a p = b p. Spinors Consider the Dirac Lagrangian The conjugate momentum is L = Ψ(i m)ψ. (205) Π = L ( 0 Ψ) = iψ. (206) We require to quantize the half-integer spin fields by imposing anti-commutation relation (Otherwise, for example, energy would be unbounded from below). {Ψ a (t,x),ψ b (t,y)} = δ3 (x y)δ ab, a,b = 1,2,3,4.. (207) The expansion of Ψ in terms of plane waves is Ψ(x) = Ψ(x) = The relation in (207) gives d 3 p (2π) 3 2E p s=1,2 d 3 p (2π) 3 2E p s=1,2 (a p,s u s (p)e ipx + b p,sv s (p)e ipx ) (a p,sū s (p)e ipx + b p,s v s (p)e ipx ). (208) {a p,r,a q,s } = {b p,r,b q,s } = (2π)3 δ 3 (p q)δ r,s. (209) Rest of the anti-commutators are zero. The vacuum state is defined as a p,r 0 = b p,r 0 = 0. (210) 25

The multi-particle states are obtained by hitting the vacuum with a p,r,b p,r. Since the operators anti-commute among themselves, the multi-particle state is antisymmetric under exchange of two particles (obeying Fermi-Dirac statistics). We normalize the one-particle state as before (2E p )a p,s 0, (2E p )b p,s 0. (211) The Hamiltonian density is H = Π 0 Ψ L = Ψ( γ i i + m)ψ. (212) Written in terms of annihilation and creation operators, we get the Hamiltonian H = d 3 p (2π) 3 s=1,2 E p (a p,s a p,s + b p,s b p,s). (213) We skip the details of the computation here as a similar one for momentum will be done explicitly later. Few comments are now in order. Firstly, for spinors, while doing normal ordering, we put a p,s to the left of a p,s and b p,s to the left of b p,s adding a minus sign each time we exchange a position of any annihilation and creation operator, such as : a p,s a p,s := a p,sa p,s. Secondly, had we quantized Ψ with usual commutation relations, the + sign in (213) would have been, making the energy unbounded from below. Thirdly, as {a p,r,a p,s} = 0, it is impossible to have two quanta of Dirac field in the same state. The momentum operator is obtained from Noether theorem P i = d 3 p (2π) 3 s=1,2 p i (a p,sa p,s + b p,sb p,s ). (214) To get used to the manipulations with spinors, let us do this calculation explicitly. First the energy-momentum tensor is ( see (92)) T µα = L ( µ Ψ) α Ψ + L ( µ Ψ) α Ψ η µα L = i Ψγ µ α ψ η µα L. (215) So P i = d 3 xt 0i = i d 3 x Ψγ 0 i Ψ = i d 3 xψ i Ψ (216) since γ 2 = 1. Using explicit expansions for Ψ and Ψ we get P i = i d 3 xd 3 pd 3 q (2π) 6 (a 4E p E q,ru r (q)e iqx + b q,r v r (q)e iqx ) q r,s i (a p,s u s (p)e ipx + b p,s vs (p)e ipx ) d 3 xd 3 pd 3 q = (2π) 6 p i (a q,r 4E p E ur (q)e iqx + b q,r v r (q)e iqx ) q r,s (+a p,s u s (p)e ipx b p,sv s (p)e ipx ). (217) 26

Now, integration over x produces a δ function = Further, integrating over q = d 3 pd 3 q (2π) 3 4E p E q p i r,s ( a q,r ur (q)a p,s u s (p)δ 3 (q p) a q,ru r (q)b p,sv s (p)δ 3 (q + p) b q,r v r (q)b p,s vs (p)δ 3 (p q) ) +b q,r v r (q)a p,s u s (p)δ 3 (p + q) d 3 p (2π) 3 p i ( + a 2E p,ru r (p)a p,s u s (p) a p,ru r ( p)b p,sv s (p) p r,s ) b p,r v r (p)b p,sv s (p) + b p,r v r ( p)a p,s u s (p) (218) (219) We now use the following identities (These follow easily from our previous discussion on Dirac equation. Prove the identities.) u r (p)u s (p) = 2E p δ rs, v r (p)v s (p) = 2E p δ rs v r (p)u s ( p) = 0, u r (p)v s ( p) = 0 (220) to get P i = The normal ordered P i is then, P i = d 3 p (2π) 3 p i (a p,r a p,r b p,r b p,r ). (221) r d 3 p (2π) 3 p i (a p,ra p,r + b p,rb p,r ). (222) r Angular momentum is a Noether charge and has contributions from orbital and spin part. Show that the spin part is S i = 1 d 3 xψ Σ i Ψ (223) 2 where Σ i = [ σ i 0 0 σ i Further use the mode expansions to check, in the rest frame, ] (224) S z a p,1 0 = 1 2 a p,1 0, Sz a p,2 0 = 1 2 a p,2 0. S z b p,1 0 = 1 2 b p,1 0, Sz b p,2 0 = 1 2 b 0,2 0 (225) Finally the conserved charge following from the symmetry Ψ e iα Ψ is Q = d 3 p (2π) 3 (a p,r a p,r b p,r b p,r). (226) r 27

So Qa p,1 0 = +a p,1 0, Qa p,2 0 = +a p,2 0. Qb p,1 0 = b p,1 0, Qb p,2 0 = b p,2 0. (227) The state created by a p,s are called particle and the one created by b p,s are called an antiparticle state. In fact, in electrodynamics, we identify a p,s 0 as an electron and b p,s 0 as a positron. Electromagnetic field: Lorentz (or covariant) gauge Consider the Lagrangian L = 1 4 F µνf µν. (228) The momentum conjugate to A i is Π i = L ( 0 A i ). (229) In order to quantize the theory, we would like to impose an equal time commutation relation [A i (x,t),π j (y,t)] = δ ij δ 3 (x y). (230) Note that the momentum conjugate to A i = Π i = Π i. In a Lorentz covariant theory, one would like to make the above commutation relation covariant [A µ (x,t),π ν (y,t)] = iη µν δ 3 (x y). (231) However, owing to the antisymmetry of F µν, it is easy to check that Π 0 = 0. Therefore, it can not have non-trivial commutation relation with A 0. To overcome this problem, we modify the Lagrangian as follows: L = 1 4 F µνf µν 1 2 ( µa µ ) 2. (232) Note that, we have now broken the gauge invariance by adding the extra piece. Conjugate momenta is defined as Π µ = L ( 0 A µ ), (233) so that Π i = F 0i = E i and Π 0 = µ A µ. We can therefore implement the canonical commutation relation. The equations of motion that follow from L are Hence A µ has a plane wave expansion A µ = 0. (234) A µ (x) = d 3 p 3 ( (2π) 3 ǫ µ (p,λ)a p,λ e ipx + ǫ 2E µ(p,λ)a p,λ eipx) (235) p λ=0 28

with E p = p and p 2 = 0. The ǫ µ (p,λ) are the four independent polarization vectors. The Lorentz transformation properties of A µ is carried by these vectors. We will choose a frame where p µ = (p,0,0,p) and take these linearly independent vectors as ǫ µ (p,0) = (1,0,0,0) ǫ µ (p,1) = (0,1,0,0) ǫ µ (p,2) = (0,0,1,0) ǫ µ (p,3) = (0,0,0,1). (236) Note that ǫ µ (p,1),ǫ µ (p,2) are transverse to the direction of propagation. In a general frame ǫ µ can be found by a Lorentz transformation. From (231), it follows that and the rest are zero. [a p,λ,a q,λ ] = (2π) 3 δ 3 (p q)η λλ (237) Notice that the norm of a single particle state is given by p,λ p,λ = (2E p ) 0 a p,λ a p,λ 0 = η λλ2e p V, (238) where V is the volume cutoff. We now see λ = 0 state has negative norm. This puts the probabilistic interpretation of the state in trouble. In order to get rid of such states, we impose the Lorentz gauge condition. We say that for any two physical states P and P, the following relation holds P µ A µ P = 0. (239) Note that we can break µ A µ = ( µ A µ ) + + ( µ A µ ) (240) where the + part contains a p,λ and the part contains a p,λ. Since ( µa µ ) = ( µ A µ ) +, (239) is equivalent to ( µ A µ ) + P = 0. (241) Since the above is a Lorentz invariant constraint, we can explore its meaning in any frame. Let us choose a frame where p µ = (E p,0,0,e p ). Then ( µ A µ ) + d 3 p = i (2π) 3 p µ ǫ µ (p,λ)a p,λ e ipx 2E p = i λ d 3 p E p (2π) 3 2 (a p,0 a p,3 )e ipx (242) Now if (241) has to hold, then (a p,0 a p,3 ) P = 0. To go from the first to the second line, we used the fact that in the chosen frame p µ ǫ µ (p,λ) = 0 for λ = 1,2. Let us now consider the first excited state (a p,0 a p,3 ) 0. a k,0 (a p,0 a p,3 ) 0 = (2π)3 δ 3 (p k) a k,3 (a p,0 a p,3 ) 0 = (2π)3 δ 3 (p k). (243) 29

Therefore, (a p,0 a p,3 ) 0 satisfies the physical state condition. However, (a p,0 + a p,3 ) 0 does not. But note that scalar products of (a p,0 a p,3 ) 0 with states created by a p,1,a p,2 are zero by virtue of their commutation relations. It is easy to check that this state is also orthogonal to itself. Therefore, (a p,0 a p,3 ) 0 is a null state and decouples. The physical states are only formed by the transverse excitations a p,1,a p,2! 4 Perturbations Particless are not free. They interact and we need a framework to describe their interaction. The types of interactions depend on the kind of fields we are considering. Fro example, in the case of real scalar fields, interactions could be of the form term L int = λ 4! φ4, (244) with the corresponding Hamiltonian H int = λ/4!φ 4,. Here, λ is known as the coupling constant. We can also consider a term qa µ Ψγ µ Ψ (245) as in (177) as the interaction term in quantum electrodynamics. If λ or q is small, we may treat the respective interaction terms small, and, hope to compute their effects by doing a perturbation expansion around the free field configurations. This is what we will learn in this and next few sections. What we expect to happen as we turn on interaction? A hint can be obtained from (244). Expanding φ 4 in terms of creation and annihilation operators of the free theory, we get terms like a a a a, a a a a and others. This tells us that as we switch on interactions, there are creations and annihilation of particles, changing the particle number. Evolution operator In presence of interactions, the field φ(x) satisfies a complicated equation of motion and an exact form of solution is hard to obtain. We need to set up a perturbation expansion. To proceed, first we would like to relate φ to a field φ I whose evolution is determined by the free part of the Hamiltonian. For φ I, that means, if we know φ I (t,x) at some fixed time t 0, at a later time it is given by φ I (t,x) = e ih 0(t t 0 ) φ I (t 0,x)e ih 0(t t 0 ). (246) Since φ I (t,x) evolves as a free field, it has standard plane wave expansion d 3 p φ I (t,x) = (2π) 3 (a p e ipx + a p 2E eipx ). (247) p We can now relate φ with φ I as follows. Let φ(t 0,x) = f(x). We choose φ I (t,x) such that at t = t 0 it is given by f(x). Then φ(t,x) = e ih(t t 0) φ(t 0,x)e ih(t t 0) We are going to concentrate on scalar field here. But the construction goes through for the other fields as well 30

Here, we have defined = e ih(t t 0) e ih 0(t t 0 ) e ih 0(t t 0 ) φ(t 0,x)e ih 0(t t 0 ) e ih 0(t t 0 ) e ih(t t 0) = U (t,t 0 )φ I (t,x)u(t,t 0 ). (248) U(t,t 0 ) = e ih 0(t t 0 ) e ih(t t 0), (249) which is commonly known as the evolution operator. Note that it is not same as e ih int(t t 0 ) as H 0 and H int generally do not commute. It is easy to check the following relation however holds: i U t = e ih 0(t t 0 ) (H H 0 )e ih(t t 0) = e ih 0(t t 0 ) H int e ih 0(t t 0 ) U(t,t 0 ) = H I U(t,t 0 ). (250) The last line defines H I for us. With the boundary condition U(t 0,t 0 ) = 1, the solution is U(t,t 0 ) = T {e i t dt H t I (t ) } 0. (251) Here T {..} means the following. If we Taylor expand the exponential, the terms in the Taylor series are time ordered. Time ordering among two operators φ(x) and φ(y) is given by { } T φ(x)φ(y) = φ(x)φ(y) if x 0 > y 0 = φ(y)φ(x) if y 0 > x 0. (252) That the form (251) is a solution can be directly checked. To see this, we first notice that the equation (250) has a solution t U(t,t 0 ) = 1 i dt 1 H I (t 1 )U(t 1,t 0 ), t 0 (253) This expression is not useful because of the U(t 1,t 0 ) term on the right hand side. We can get a solution iteratively if we replace U(t 1,t 0 ) again by (253) t ( t1 ) U(t,t 0 ) = 1 i H I (t 1 ) 1 i H I (t 2 )U(t 2,t 0 )dt 2 dt 1. (254) t 0 t 0 Carrying this out repeatedly, we obtain t U(t,t 0 ) = 1 + ( i) n dt 1 n=1 t 0 t1 t 0 dt 2... tn 1 t 0 dt n H I (t 1 )H I (t 2 )...H I (t n ). (255) The above solution can be re-written using the time-ordering defined before. Take, for example, n = 2 term in (251) Note that 1 t t dt 1 2 t 0 = 1 2 + 1 2 t 0 dt 2 T t t t 0 dt 1 t 0 dt 2 { } H I (t 1 )H I (t 2 ) t1 (256) t 0 dt 2 H I (t 1 )H I (t 2 ) (257) t2 31 t 0 dt 1 H I (t 2 )H I (t 1 ) (258)

The first term is obtained for t 1 > t 2 and the second for t 2 > t 1. Now we interchange the dummy variables t 1 and t 2 in the second integral. Adding two contributions, we reach at t t 0 dt 1 t1 t 0 dt 2 H I (t 1 )H I (t 2 ). (259) This is the n = 2 term in (255). One can repeat this exercise for other values of n as well. We now want to compute the n-point Green s function. The reason for that will be discussed later. The n-point Green s function is defined as 0 φ(x 1 )φ(x 2 )...φ(x n ) 0 (260) when x i s are time ordered, meaning x 0 1 > x0 2 >...x0 n. We can re-write this as 0 U (t 1,t 0 )φ I (x 1 )U(t 1,t 0 )U (t 2,t 0 )φ I (x 2 )U(t 2,t 0 )...U (t n,t 0 )φ I (x n )U(t n,t 0 ) 0. (261) However since U (t 2,t 0 ) = U(t 0,t 2 ) and U(t 1,t 0 )U(t 0,t 2 ) = U(t 1,t 2 ) (Show), we get 0 U (t 1,t 0 )φ I (x 1 )U(t 1,t 2 )φ I (x 2 )U(t 2,t 3 )...U(t n 1,t n )φ I (x n )U(t n,t 0 ) 0. (262) We now introduce a new variable t such that t t 1 > t 2 >... > t n t and use U(t n,t 0 ) = U(t n, t)u( t,t 0 ) to re-write the above as 0 U (t,t 0 )[U(t,t 1 )φ I (x 1 )U(t 1,t 2 )φ I (x 2 )U(t 2,t 3 )...U(t n 1,t n )φ I (x n )U(t n, t)]u( t,t 0 ) 0. (263) Now notice that the terms inside the square brackets are already time ordered. So we can write { } [...] = T φ I (x 1 )φ I (x 2 )...φ I (x n )U(t,t 1 )U(t 1,t 2 )...U(t n, t). { } = T φ I (x 1 )φ I (x 2 )...φ I (x n )U(t, t) = T {φ I (x 1 )φ I (x 2 )...φ I (x n )e i t H t I(t )dt }. (264) In the last line we used the property T {A(x 1 )A(x 2 )...T {B(x n )B(x n+1 }} = T {A(x 1 )Ax 2 )...B(x n )B(x n+1 )}. Since this is true for arbitrary t 0, we can choose t 0 = t and then take t to reduce (263) to 0 U (, )T {φ I (x 1 )φ I (x 2 )...φ I (x n )e i t H I( )dt } 0. (265) The term 0 U (, ) = (U(, ) 0 ) and U(, ) simply evolves a vacuum state from infinite past to infinite future. Assuming that the vacuum state is stable, applying U(, ) we get again a vacuum state but it may differ by a phase factor (in quantum mechanics, two state vectors differing by a phase factor are physically same.). So generally, we have U(, ) 0 = e iα 0. (266) So giving 0 U(, ) 0 = 0 e iα 0 = e iα (267) e iα = 0 T {e i dt H I (t ) } 0. (268) 32

With these manipulations, we finally arrive at an important formula: 0 T {φ(x 1 )φ(x 2 )...φ(x n )} 0 = 0 T {φ I(x 1 )...φ I (x n )e i dt H I (t ) } 0 0 T {e i. (269) dt H I (t ) } 0 Scattering matrix and the LSZ reduction formula. In Schrodinger picture, a state vector, at an initial time T i, is an eigen vector of a set of commuting operators with eigen values written collectively as a. We denote the state by a(t i ). Similarly, at final time T f, we denote eigen state as b(t f ). We know a(t i ) evolves as e ih(t T i) a(t i ). So the amplitude for a process for which the initial state a(t i ) goes to the final state b(t f ) is given by b(t f ) e ih(t f T i ) a(t i ). (270) In the limit when T f T i, e ih(t f T i ) is called the S-matrix. We can easily check that S S = 1. If a is the initial state normalized to 1 and n is a complete set of states, then a going to n summed over all n must be one. That is n S a 2 = 1. (271) This, in turn, means n a S n n S a = a S S a, (272) n where we have used the completeness condition on n. Comparing the last two equations, we conclude that S S = 1. Since in field theory operators like φ and others explicitly depend on time, it is convenient to work in the Heisenberg representation. Operators in the two representations are related by A H (t) = e iht Ae iht, while the state vector in Heisenberg representation is time independent and related to the one in the Schrodinger representation as a,t i H = e iht a(t). T i here is just a label. Now connecting this with our previous discussion, we see Therefore, a,t i H = e iht i a, b,t f H = e iht f b. (273) For notational simplicity we will omit the subscript H henceforth. b S a = b,t f a,t i H. (274) Let us consider a general S-matrix element written in Heisenberg representation p 1,p 2,T f k 1,k 2,T i. (275) We are considering here a single species of real scalar particle, so that the states are labeled by only their momenta. We will, at the end, be interested in the limits T f,t i. Our task will be to relate this matrix element with a 4-point Green s function. Further, we will consider the case when k 1,k 2 p 1,p 2. First notice that for free fields, as in (182), we can express a and a in terms of fields and its derivatives. This is not true when the interactions are turned on. However, in the limit 33