Katrin Becker, Texas A&M University. Strings 2016, YMSC,Tsinghua University

Similar documents
SUPERSTRING REALIZATIONS OF SUPERGRAVITY IN TEN AND LOWER DIMENSIONS. John H. Schwarz. Dedicated to the memory of Joël Scherk

String Theory and Generalized Geometries

On Special Geometry of Generalized G Structures and Flux Compactifications. Hu Sen, USTC. Hangzhou-Zhengzhou, 2007

Generalized N = 1 orientifold compactifications

A Landscape of Field Theories

Quantum Field Theory III

Exact solutions in supergravity

Lecture 7: N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theory

The N = 2 Gauss-Bonnet invariant in and out of superspace

BULK AND BRANE SUPERSYMMETRY BREAKING. Jonathan Bagger SUSY 2002

Instantons in supersymmetric gauge theories. Tobias Hansen Talk at tuesday s Werkstatt Seminar January 10, 2012

A Supergravity Dual for 4d SCFT s Universal Sector

ON ULTRAVIOLET STRUCTURE OF 6D SUPERSYMMETRIC GAUGE THEORIES. Ft. Lauderdale, December 18, 2015 PLAN

1 4-dimensional Weyl spinor

A Short Note on D=3 N=1 Supergravity

Inflation from supersymmetry breaking

Dimensional reduction

The rudiments of Supersymmetry 1/ 53. Supersymmetry I. A. B. Lahanas. University of Athens Nuclear and Particle Physics Section Athens - Greece

Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee

Solutions to gauge hierarchy problem. SS 10, Uli Haisch

Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes

Heterotic Geometry and Fluxes

Recent Progress on Curvature Squared Supergravities in Five and Six Dimensions

String Theory Compactifications with Background Fluxes

First Year Seminar. Dario Rosa Milano, Thursday, September 27th, 2012

Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime

Anomaly and gaugino mediation

Some Geometrical Problems in AdS/CFT

Contact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED

F-theory effective physics via M-theory. Thomas W. Grimm!! Max Planck Institute for Physics (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut)! Munich

MIFPA PiTP Lectures. Katrin Becker 1. Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. 1

Small Black Strings/Holes

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 21 May 1996

Stability in Maximal Supergravity

Supercurrents. Nathan Seiberg IAS

Supersymmetric Randall-Sundrum Scenario

Generalized Calabi-Yau compactifications with D-branes and fluxes

Phenomenological Aspects of LARGE Volume Models

Yet Another Alternative to Compactification by Heterotic Five-branes

Rigid SUSY in Curved Superspace

Brane world scenarios

M-Theory and Matrix Models

Some Useful Formalism for Supersymmetry

Introduction to supersymmetry

Exact Results in D=2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories And Applications

Spinning strings and QED

Aspects of SUSY Breaking

Solution Set 8 Worldsheet perspective on CY compactification

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 28 Jan 1999

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 15 Jul 1999

Kähler representations for twisted supergravity. Laurent Baulieu LPTHE. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Puri, January 6th, 2011

2d N = (2, 2) supersymmetry with U(1) RV in curved space

Quantum Dynamics of Supergravity

Generalized complex geometry and supersymmetric non-linear sigma models

Life with More Than 4: Extra Dimensions

Flux Compactification of Type IIB Supergravity

Supersymmetric field theories

Supersymmetry and the LHC

Inflation in heterotic supergravity models with torsion

Symmetries of curved superspace

Symmetries, Groups Theory and Lie Algebras in Physics

Recent Advances in SUSY

Lectures on Supersymmetry I

Interpolating geometries, fivebranes and the Klebanov-Strassler theory

A Higher Derivative Extension of the Salam-Sezgin Model from Superconformal Methods

Thick Brane World. Seyen Kouwn Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute Korea

Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION. Special Geometry. Yang Zhang. Abstract: N = 2 Supergravity. based on hep-th/ , Boris PiolineA

Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2

Pietro Fre' SISSA-Trieste. Paolo Soriani University degli Studi di Milano. From Calabi-Yau manifolds to topological field theories

AdS spacetimes and Kaluza-Klein consistency. Oscar Varela

1 Susy in 4d- Notes by Horatiu Nastase A very basic introduction (survival guide)

F(R) SUPERGRAVITY and EARLY UNIVERSE

Some applications of light-cone superspace

Yet Another Alternative to Compactification

Citation for published version (APA): de Wit, T. C. (2003). Domain-walls and gauged supergravities Groningen: s.n.

Interacting non-bps black holes

Anomalies, Conformal Manifolds, and Spheres

Partial SUSY Breaking for Asymmetric Gepner Models and Non-geometric Flux Vacua

1 Introduction 1. 5 Recent developments 49. Appendix A. Conventions and definitions 50 Spinors Differential geometry

Lecture 7 SUSY breaking

Introduction. Chapter Why string theory?

Non-Abelian tensor multiplet in four dimensions

Moduli of heterotic G2 compactifications

Introduction to AdS/CFT

On the curious spectrum of duality-invariant higher-derivative gravitational field theories

Hierarchy Problems in String Theory: An Overview of the Large Volume Scenario

Exact results in AdS/CFT from localization. Part I

Lecture 1. Supersymmetry: Introduction

2 Type IIA String Theory with Background Fluxes in d=2

Entropy of asymptotically flat black holes in gauged supergravit

3-dimensional topological σ-model

Lecture 12 Holomorphy: Gauge Theory

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 6 Mar 1995

The exact quantum corrected moduli space for the universal hypermultiplet

Quantum Nambu Geometry in String Theory

Week 9: Einstein s field equations

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 13 Sep 2001

8.821 String Theory Fall 2008

Topological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons

Transcription:

Katrin Becker, Texas A&M University Strings 2016, YMSC,Tsinghua University

± Overview

Overview ± II. What is the manifestly supersymmetric complete space-time action for an arbitrary string theory or M-theory compactification?

Overview ± II. What is the manifestly supersymmetric complete space-time action for an arbitrary string theory or M-theory compactification?

Overview ± II. What is the manifestly supersymmetric complete space-time action for an arbitrary string theory or M-theory compactification?

General Remarks A vacuum of type II supergravity is 1,2 R M Minkowski space parallel spinor Supersymmetry in space-time η = a 0 Calabi-Yau, Spin(7) manifold

Tools Given a 7d spin manifold M there is a unit spinor η abc T ϕ = η Γ η abc unit spinor T η η = 1 and a 4-form... T ψ abcd = η Γabcdη

Tools Given a 7d spin manifold M there is a unit spinor η abc T ϕ = η Γ η abc unit spinor T η η = 1 and a 4-form... T ψ abcd = η Γabcdη related by ψ = ϕ

Tools Given a 7d spin manifold M there is a unit spinor η abc T ϕ = η Γ η abc unit spinor T η η = 1 and a 4-form... T ψ abcd = η Γabcdη related by ψ = ϕ [ ] ( ) ϕ det 1/9 g = g = s s ab ab ab Metric 1 sab = ϕamnϕbpqϕrstε 144 mnpqrst

dϕ dψ = 0 = 0 dϕ = τ ψ + 3τ ϕ + τ 0 1 3 dψ = 4τ ψ + τ ϕ 1 2

dϕ dψ = 0 = 0 dϕ = τ ψ + 3τ ϕ + τ 0 1 3 dψ = 4τ ψ + τ ϕ 1 2

dϕ dψ = 0 = 0 dϕ = τ ψ + 3τ ϕ + τ 0 1 3 dψ = 4τ ψ + τ ϕ 1 2 τ, τ, τ, τ 0 1 2 3 are torsion classes

Leading Order Correction

Gravitino supersymmetry transformation δψ a = a η A a = 0 1 = 32g b 3 c dc1 c6 bd1 d6 Ba α ' ϕacd ε ε Rc 1c2d1d R 2 c3c4d3d R 4 c5c6d5d6

Gravitino supersymmetry transformation δψ a = a η A η ib b a a b + + Γ η α corrections A a = 0 1 = 32g b 3 c dc1 c6 bd1 d6 Ba α ' ϕacd ε ε Rc 1c2d1d R 2 c3c4d3d R 4 c5c6d5d6

Gravitino supersymmetry transformation δψ a = a η A η ib b a a b + + Γ η In 7d dimensions spinors have 8 real components. A basis is η Γ η, a=1,...,7. { }, a α corrections A a = 0 1 = 32g b 3 c dc1 c6 bd1 d6 Ba α ' ϕacd ε ε Rc 1c2d1d R 2 c3c4d3d R 4 c5c6d5d6

Gravitino supersymmetry transformation δψ a = a η A η ib b a a b + + Γ η In 7d dimensions spinors have 8 real components. A basis is η Γ η, a=1,...,7. { }, a The coefficients are tensors A A [ ϕ] a α corrections b b = B = B [ ϕ] a a a A a = 0 1 = 32g b 3 c dc1 c6 bd1 d6 Ba α ' ϕacd ε ε Rc 1c2d1d R 2 c3c4d3d R 4 c5c6d5d6

Gravitino supersymmetry transformation δψ a = a η A η ib b a a b + + Γ η In 7d dimensions spinors have 8 real components. A basis is η Γ η, a=1,...,7. { }, a The coefficients are tensors A A [ ϕ] a α corrections b b = B = B [ ϕ] a a a A a = 0 1 = 32g b 3 c dc1 c6 bd1 d6 Ba α ' ϕacd ε ε Rc 1c2d1d R 2 c3c4d3d R 4 c5c6d5d6

Supersymmetric Vacuum [ ] ib b [ ] ' A a a a a b δψ = η ' + ϕ η + ϕ Γ η = 0

Supersymmetric Vacuum [ ] ib b [ ] ' A a a a a b δψ = η ' + ϕ η + ϕ Γ η = 0 Primed quantities include corrections: 3 η ' = η + O( α ' )

Supersymmetric Vacuum [ ] ib b [ ] ' A a a a a b δψ = η ' + ϕ η + ϕ Γ η = 0 Primed quantities include corrections: 3 η ' = η + O( α ' )

Supersymmetric Vacuum [ ] ib b [ ] ' A a a a a b δψ = η ' + ϕ η + ϕ Γ η = 0 Primed quantities include corrections: 3 η ' = η + O( α ' ) Set up PDE dϕ dψ ψ [ ] [ ] ' = α ϕ ' = β ϕ ' = ' ϕ '

Supersymmetric Vacuum [ ] ib b [ ] ' A a a a a b δψ = η ' + ϕ η + ϕ Γ η = 0 Primed quantities include corrections: 3 η ' = η + O( α ' ) Set up PDE dϕ dψ ψ [ ] [ ] ' = α ϕ ' = β ϕ ' = ' ϕ ' α = 8A ϕ 8B ψ e abcd [ a bcd ] [ a bcd ] e β = 10A ψ 40B ϕ abcde [ a bcde] [ ab cde]

All Orders in α

Using induction over the order in α ' it is possible to show that a solution of the supersymmetry conditions exists to any order in α ' provided the corresponding dϕ ' dψ ' n n = = ψ ' = ' ϕ ' [ '] α ϕ n [ '] β ϕ n

Using induction over the order in α ' it is possible to show that a solution of the supersymmetry conditions exists to any order in α ' provided the corresponding contains the unknown which is the order n of φ dϕ dψ ψ ' ' n n = = ' = ' ϕ ' [ '] α ϕ n [ '] β ϕ n

Using induction over the order in α ' it is possible to show that a solution of the supersymmetry conditions exists to any order in α ' provided the corresponding contains the unknown which is the order n of φ dϕ dψ ψ ' ' n n = = ' = ' ϕ ' [ '] α ϕ n [ '] β ϕ n involves φ to order less than n

Using induction over the order in α ' it is possible to show that a solution of the supersymmetry conditions exists to any order in α ' provided the corresponding contains the unknown which is the order n of φ dϕ dψ ψ ' ' n n = = ' = ' ϕ ' [ '] α ϕ n [ '] β ϕ n = = dχ dξ n n involves φ to order less than n

Using induction over the order in α ' it is possible to show that a solution of the supersymmetry conditions exists to any order in α ' provided the corresponding contains the unknown which is the order n of φ dϕ dψ ψ ' ' n n = = ' = ' ϕ ' [ '] α ϕ n [ '] β ϕ n = = dχ dξ Exactness of α and β is not only necessary but also sufficient... n n involves φ to order less than n

Using induction over the order in α ' it is possible to show that a solution of the supersymmetry conditions exists to any order in α ' provided the corresponding contains the unknown which is the order n of φ dϕ dψ ψ ' ' n n = = ' = ' ϕ ' [ '] α ϕ n [ '] β ϕ n = = dχ dξ Exactness of α and β is not only necessary but also sufficient... There exists a solution of δψ=0 to all orders in α! n n involves φ to order less than n

II. The Space-Time Action of M-theory Compactified to 4d in N=1 Superspace

We wish to describe the fluctuations around the background...! 1,3 M

We wish to describe the fluctuations around the background...! 1,3 M... these include massless states as well as massive KK modes.

Guiding Principles 4d supersymmetry Assemble fields into 4d superfields

Guiding Principles 4d supersymmetry Locality Assemble fields into 4d superfields Keep locality along space-time and M. φ = φ ( x, y) 1 C = Cabc ( x, y) dy dy dy 3! a b c

Guiding Principles 4d supersymmetry Locality Assemble fields into 4d superfields Keep locality along space-time and M. φ = φ ( x, y) 1 C = Cabc ( x, y) dy dy dy 3! a b c 11d fields decompose into many 4d fields { CMNP, GMN C, C, C, C abc abµ aµν µνρ g, g, g ab aµ µν

Manifest Global 4d Supersymmetry ( x, θ, θ µ! ) The coordinates of flat 4d superspace are m µ. Superfields are functions of these coordinates...

Manifest Global 4d Supersymmetry ( x, θ, θ µ! ) The coordinates of flat 4d superspace are m µ. Superfields are functions of these coordinates... D = iθ σ θ α m α! α! αα! m Chiral superfields D α Φ = 0! Φ x, θ = C x + 2 θψ x + θθ F( x ) ( ) ( ) ( ) + + + C ( = x, y) = ϕˆ ( x, y) + ic ( x, y) abc abc abc m m m x = x ± ± iθσ θ To leading order in α ': ˆϕ = ϕ

1 2 Action For Chiral Superfields ( + ) [ ] D 4 4 I = d x K Φ Φ + d x f Φ F + c c, ( )..

1 2 Action For Chiral Superfields ( + ) [ ] D 4 4 I = d x K Φ Φ + d x f Φ F + c c, ( ).. Lagrangian density for bosonic fields δ K ' C( ) ( C') ( ) ( ') δ C 2 7 7 L = d yd y y y F y F y M M ( ) ( ) ( µ y y ' ) µ δ C + ( C) 7 2Re d y F( y) M δ f δ C( y)

Superpotential A good candidate is f ( ) In a supersymmetric ground state Φ = β Φ dφ constant M δ f δφ = 0 dφ = 0 dϕˆ = 0, G = 0 4 ϕˆ = ϕ ' χ There is a closed 3-form!

C = ϕ + ic Kähler Form abc abc abc are coordinates of an infinite dimensional Kaehler manifold. Eleven-dimensional gauge transformations gives rise to isometries of the metric. δ C = dλ the space Λ V of 2-forms mod closed 2-form The Kähler form is invariant and as a result there is a moment map (a concept we borrow from symplectic geometry). As we show in more detail in our paper the vanishing of the moment map implies µ δ K = 0 a = 0 δ abc ( y) C Closed 4-form!

Needles to say it would be interesting to derive these conditions from a Kaluza-Klein reduction of M-theory. We envision this as a two step process: 1) we rewrite the action of 11d supergravity in a form that displays manifest N=1 supersymmetry in 4d. 2) non-renormalization theorems should then give us information about which results hold to all orders in perturbation theory.

Kaluza-Klein Reduction of M-Theory

MNP Bosonic Fields Fields are decomposed into a 4+7 split: C C, C, C, C abc abµ aµν µνρ G MN c d c hµν + gcd A A gbc A µ ν µ = c gac Aν gab µ,ν=0,..,3 Symmetries: C C + dλ x x ξ M M M 4d system is very complicated but known in detail...

α, β, are space-time indices a,b,c, are 7d indices K. B, M. Becker, D. Robbins, 1412.8198

α, β, are space-time indices a,b,c, are 7d indices K. B, M. Becker, D. Robbins, 1412.8198

α, β, are space-time indices a,b,c, are 7d indices K. B, M. Becker, D. Robbins, 1412.8198

α, β, are space-time indices a,b,c, are 7d indices K. B, M. Becker, D. Robbins, 1412.8198

α, β, are space-time indices a,b,c, are 7d indices K. B, M. Becker, D. Robbins, 1412.8198

α, β, are space-time indices a,b,c, are 7d indices K. B, M. Becker, D. Robbins, 1412.8198

α, β, are space-time indices a,b,c, are 7d indices K. B, M. Becker, D. Robbins, 1412.8198

α, β, are space-time indices a,b,c, are 7d indices K. B, M. Becker, D. Robbins, 1412.8198

Goal: Write this Action in Superspace

Use the Kaehler potential Kinetic Terms 3 κ 7 K = d y g F 2 M ( ) [ ] ( ) ϕ det 1/9 g = g = s s ab ab ab Metric 1 sab = ϕamnϕbpqϕrstε 144 mnpqrst F 1 = Φ Φ 2i ( ) 3 [ V ] abc abc abc a bc Real superfield for C ab µ

The kinetic terms obtained from M-theory compactification are Skin 1 4 2 2 = g 2 ( π1 µ ϕ) ( π 27 µ ϕ) 24κ + 3 1 g C C C C C C 2 24κ { 2 2 2 } π1( µ 3 µ ) π 7( µ 3 µ ) π 27( µ 3 µ ) Expanding in components the kinetic terms obtained from superspace are Skin 1 4 2 2 2 = g ( π 2 1 µ ϕ) ( π 7 µ ϕ) ( π 27 µ ϕ) 24κ + + 3 1 g C C C C C C 2 24κ { 2 2 2 } π1( µ 3 µ ) + π 7( µ 3 µ ) π 27( µ 3 µ )

The kinetic terms obtained from M-theory compactification are Skin 1 4 2 2 = g 2 ( π1 µ ϕ) ( π 27 µ ϕ) 24κ + 3 1 g C C C C C C 2 24κ { 2 2 2 } π1( µ 3 µ ) π 7( µ 3 µ ) π 27( µ 3 µ ) Expanding in components the kinetic terms obtained from superspace are Skin 1 4 2 2 2 = g ( π 2 1 µ ϕ) ( π 7 µ ϕ) ( π 27 µ ϕ) 24κ + + 3 1 g C C C C C C 2 24κ { 2 2 2 } π1( µ 3 µ ) + π 7( µ 3 µ ) π 27( µ 3 µ ) This coefficient only agrees after integrating out auxiliary fields in the gravity multiplet.

Potential The potential for the scalar from the metric can be nicely expressed in terms of torsion classes 1 21 1 1 2κ 8 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 S pot = d y g τ 2 0 + 30 τ1 τ 3 τ 2 W 1 8κ = ± 2 ϕdϕ

Potential The potential for the scalar from the metric can be nicely expressed in terms of torsion classes 1 21 1 1 2κ 8 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 S pot = d y g τ 2 0 + 30 τ1 τ 3 τ 2 Get contributions from the superpotential W 1 8κ = ± 2 ϕdϕ

Potential The potential for the scalar from the metric can be nicely expressed in terms of torsion classes 1 21 1 1 2κ 8 2 2 7 2 2 2 2 S pot = d y g τ 2 0 + 30 τ1 τ 3 τ 2 Get contributions from the superpotential W 1 8κ = ± 2 ϕdϕ This result agrees precisely with the superspace result!

Tensor Hierarchy and Chern-Simons Actions in Superspace References: K. B., M. Becker, W. D. Linch and D. Robbins, 1601.03066, 1603.07362 1) In the first paper we embedded the tensor hierarchy consisting of all fields descending from the M-theory three-form C C, C, C, C MNP abc abµ aµν µνρ and the corresponding abelian gauge transformations into superspace. δ C = dλ

We explicitly constructed the supersymmetrized Chern-Simons action 1 4 2 2 Re[ (2 α 2 α θ α α ) S = i d xd Φ EG + Φ W W + Σ EW 12κ 1 4 4 θ ˆ ˆ 2 α α d xd [ 2 Φ UH + VEH + ( VD U D VU ) Wα + 12κ α! α α! ( VD U D VU ) W Σ UD U Σ UD U XEU ˆ ] α! α! α α!

We explicitly constructed the supersymmetrized Chern-Simons action 1 4 2 2 Re[ (2 α 2 α θ α α ) S = i d xd Φ EG + Φ W W + Σ EW 12κ 1 4 4 θ ˆ ˆ 2 α α d xd [ 2 Φ UH + VEH + ( VD U D VU ) Wα + 12κ α! α α! ( VD U D VU ) W Σ UD U Σ UD U XEU ˆ ] α! α! α α!

We explicitly constructed the supersymmetrized Chern-Simons action 1 4 2 2 Re[ (2 α 2 α θ α α ) S = i d xd Φ EG + Φ W W + Σ EW 12κ 1 4 4 θ ˆ ˆ 2 α α d xd [ 2 Φ UH + VEH + ( VD U D VU ) Wα + 12κ α! α α! ( VD U D VU ) W Σ UD U Σ UD U XEU ˆ ] α! α! α α! 2) In the second paper we coupled this system to the non-abelian gauge field arising from the metric.

Stay Tuned! More To Come...