Quantum Field Theory. Badis Ydri Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Annaba University, Annaba, Algeria. December 10, 2012

Similar documents
The Feynman Propagator and Cauchy s Theorem

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields

7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields

Classical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator

QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. Kenzo INOUE

1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions

Canonical Quantization

Attempts at relativistic QM

THE QFT NOTES 5. Badis Ydri Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Annaba University, Annaba, Algeria. December 9, 2011

Quantization of Scalar Field

Physics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions

Under evolution for a small time δt the area A(t) = q p evolves into an area

PHY 396 K. Problem set #3. Due September 29, 2011.

3.3 Lagrangian and symmetries for a spin- 1 2 field

Lecture-05 Perturbation Theory and Feynman Diagrams

Quantum Field Theory. Badis Ydri. Departement de Physique, Faculté des Sciences, Université d Annaba, Annaba, Algerie.

For QFFF MSc Students Monday, 9th January 2017: 14:00 to 16:00. Marks shown on this paper are indicative of those the Examiners anticipate assigning.

Quantum Physics 2006/07

Prancing Through Quantum Fields

1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator

On Perturbation Theory, Dyson Series, and Feynman Diagrams

d 3 k In the same non-relativistic normalization x k = exp(ikk),

Lecture 7. More dimensions

What s up with those Feynman diagrams? an Introduction to Quantum Field Theories

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz

The Hamiltonian operator and states

3P1a Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 1 Michaelmas 2016

Problem 1(a): As discussed in class, Euler Lagrange equations for charged fields can be written in a manifestly covariant form as L (D µ φ) L

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:

QFT Perturbation Theory

Goldstone Bosons and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in QCD

Preliminaries: what you need to know

Observables from Correlation Functions

2 Quantization of the scalar field

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12

Elementary Introduction to Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime

Phys624 Formalism for interactions Homework 6. Homework 6 Solutions Restriction on interaction Lagrangian. 6.1.

Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory

Lecture 12. The harmonic oscillator

PHY 396 K. Solutions for problems 1 and 2 of set #5.

MSci EXAMINATION. Date: XX th May, Time: 14:30-17:00

ADVANCED TOPICS IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS II Tutorial problem set 2, (20 points in total) Problems are due at Monday,

Solutions 4: Free Quantum Field Theory

S = ( µ φ µ φ m 2 φ φ)d 4 x (1) Then we can easily read off the Lagrangian density to be: φ a φ a φ m 2 φ φ (3) π = L φ = φ (4) φ (5)

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation

Section 4: The Quantum Scalar Field

The Barut Second-Order Equation: Lagrangian, Dynamical Invariants and Interactions

Mandl and Shaw reading assignments

Spin one matter elds. November 2015

QFT Perturbation Theory

An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory

arxiv:math-ph/ v1 6 Mar 2005

Quantization of scalar fields

Quantum Field Theory

MAKING BOHMIAN MECHANICS COMPATIBLE WITH RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. Hrvoje Nikolić Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia

Introduction to gauge theory

Path Integral for Spin

11 Spinor solutions and CPT

be stationary under variations in A, we obtain Maxwell s equations in the form ν J ν = 0. (7.5)

Spinors in Curved Space

Correlation Functions in Perturbation Theory

Physics 582, Problem Set 3 Solutions

Path integral in quantum mechanics based on S-6 Consider nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of one particle in one dimension with the hamiltonian:

Lecture 4 - Dirac Spinors

Coherent-state path integrals. The coherent states are complete (indeed supercomplete) and provide for the identity operator the expression

Chapter 10 Operators of the scalar Klein Gordon field. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.

Maxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density

Finite-temperature Field Theory

PY 351 Modern Physics - Lecture notes, 3

Lecture notes for FYS610 Many particle Quantum Mechanics

Canonical Quantization C6, HT 2016

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14.

ADVANCED QUANTUM FIELD THEORY. Exercises. Adel Bilal

Cosmology & CMB. Set2: Linear Perturbation Theory. Davide Maino

Seminar Quantum Field Theory

Ch 125a Problem Set 1

2 Classical Field Theory

H&M Chapter 5 Review of Dirac Equation

Ward Takahashi Identities

PHY 396 K. Problem set #7. Due October 25, 2012 (Thursday).

PAPER 44 ADVANCED QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

Quantization of the Dirac Field

Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Part I

Lecture 7 From Dirac equation to Feynman diagramms. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

H =Π Φ L= Φ Φ L. [Φ( x, t ), Φ( y, t )] = 0 = Φ( x, t ), Φ( y, t )

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Wednesday March 30 ± ǁ

Heisenberg-Euler effective lagrangians

Path Integrals in Quantum Field Theory C6, HT 2014

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.

An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Electrodynamics and the Higgs Mechanism

Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books

From Particles to Fields

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

4.3 Lecture 18: Quantum Mechanics

Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Transcription:

Quantum Field Theory Badis Ydri Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Annaba University, Annaba, Algeria. December 10, 2012 1

Concours Doctorat Physique Théorique Théorie Des Champs Quantique v1 2012-2013 1.5 h Problem 1 DeterminethetransformationruleunderLorentztransformationsof ψ, ψψ, ψγ µ ψ. Recall that ψ(x) ψ (x ) = S(Λ)ψ(x), where S(Λ) is the spinor representation of the Lorentz transformation Λ = exp( iω αβ J αβ /2) given by S(Λ) = exp( i 2 ω αβγ αβ ). Problem 2 Calculate the 2 point function < 0 T(ˆφ(x 1 )ˆφ(x 2 )) 0 > in φ four theory up to the 1st order in preturbation theory using the Gell-Mann Low formula and Wick s theorem. Express each order in perturbation theory in terms of Feynman diagrams. Recall that the Gell-Mann Low formula, the S matrix and the interaction Lagrangian for a phi-four theory are given by ( ) T(ˆφ(x 1 )ˆφ(x 2 )...) = S 1 T ˆφ in (x 1 )ˆφ in (x 2 )...S. S = e i d 4 yl int (y). L int = λ 4!ˆφ 4 in. 2

Concours Doctorat Physique Théorique Théorie Des Champs Quantique v2 2012-2013 1.5 h Problem 1 The Heisenberg field ˆφ(t, x), the Schrödinger field ˆφ( x) and the Diracfield ˆφ I (t, x) are related by ˆφ(t, x) = U 1 (t)ˆφ( x)u(t), ˆφ(t, x) = Ω 1 (t)ˆφ I (t, x)ω(t). The U and Ω are evolution operators satisfying the Schrödinger equation with Hamiltonians Ĥ = Ĥ0 + ˆV and ˆV I respectively where Show that U and Ω are related by ˆV I = e itĥ0ˆve itĥ0. U = e itĥ0 Ω. Show that ˆφ( x) and ˆφ I (t, x) are related by ˆφ I (t, x) = e itĥ0ˆφ( x)e itĥ0. Show that the Dirac field ˆφ I (t, x) satisfies the free Heisenberg equation, viz i tˆφi = [ˆφ I,Ĥ0]. Problem 2 The free Hamiltonian H 0 of a scalar phi-four is given by Ĥ 0 = 1 [ ] ˆP + ( p)ˆp( p)+e p 2 V ˆQ + ( p)ˆq( p), E p 2 = p2 +m 2. >0 The Schrödinger scalar field ˆφ( x) and its conjugate momentum field ˆπ( x) are given in terms of ˆQ( p) and ˆP( p) by ˆφ( x) = 1 V We give the canonical commutation relation ˆQ( p)e i p x, ˆπ( x) = 1 V [ˆQ( p), ˆP + ( p)] = ivδ p, q. ˆP( p)e i p x. Show that the Dirac field ˆφ I (t, x) is a free field satisfying the Klein-Gordon equation. 3

Concours Doctorat Physique Théorique Théorie Des Champs Quantique v3 2012-2013 1.5 h Problem 1 Show that the 2 point function for a free scalar field is given by < 0 T ˆφ(x)ˆφ(y) 0 d 4 >= (2π) 4 p 2 m 2 +iǫ e ip(x y). We give ˆφ(x) = ( d 3 p 1 â( p)e ipx +â( p) + e ). ipx (2π) 3 2E( p) [â( p),â + ( q)] = (2π) 3 δ 3 ( p q). Problem 2 Compute for a free scalar field (without recourse to Wick s theorem) the 4 point function D(x 1,x 2,x 3,x 4 ) =< 0 T ˆφ(x 1 )ˆφ(x 2 )ˆφ(x 3 )ˆφ(x 4 ) 0 >. Assume for simplicity that x 0 1 > x0 2 > x0 3 > x0 4. 4

Concours Doctorat Physique Théorique Solutions Théorie Des Champs Quantique 2012-2013 Solution 1.v1 The Dirac spinor ψ changes under Lorentz transformations as Since (γ µ ) + = γ 0 γ µ γ 0 we get (Γ µν ) + = γ 0 Γ µν γ 0. Therefore In other words As a consequence ψ(x) ψ (x ) = S(Λ)ψ(x). (0.1) S(Λ) = e i 2 ω αβγ αβ. (0.2) S(Λ) + = γ 0 S(Λ) 1 γ 0 (0.3) ψ(x) ψ (x ) = ψ(x)s(λ) 1. (0.4) ψψ ψ ψ = ψψ. (0.5) ψγ 5 ψ ψ γ 5 ψ = ψψ. (0.6) ψγ µ ψ ψ γ µ ψ = Λ µ ν ψγ ν ψ. (0.7) ψγ µ γ 5 ψ ψ γ µ γ 5 ψ = Λ µ ν ψγ ν γ 5 ψ. (0.8) We have used [γ 5,Γ µν ] = 0 and S 1 γ µ S = Λ µ νγ ν. Finally we compute ψγ µν ψ ψ Γ µν ψ = ψs 1 Γ µν Sψ = ψ i 4 [S 1 γ µ S,S 1 γ ν S]ψ = Λ µ αλ ν β ψγ αβ ψ. (0.9) Solution 2.v1 We have ( ) < 0 T(ˆφ(x 1 )ˆφ(x 2 )) 0 > = < 0 T ˆφ in (x 1 )ˆφ in (x 2 )S 0 > ( ) = < 0 T ˆφ in (x 1 )ˆφ in (x 2 )e i d 4 yl int (y) 0 > ( ) = < 0 T ˆφ in (x 1 )ˆφ in (x 2 ) 0 > +i d 4 y 1 < 0 T ( ) ˆφ in (x 1 )ˆφ in (x 2 )L int (y 1 ) 0 > +... 5 (0.10)

The 0th order term is the free propagator, viz ( ) < 0 T ˆφ in (x 1 )ˆφ in (x 2 ) 0 >= D F (x 1 x 2 ). (0.11) For a phi-four theory the interaction Lagrangian is L int = λ 4!ˆφ 4 in. (0.12) The 1st order term is thus ( ) i d 4 y 1 < 0 T ˆφ in (x 1 )ˆφ in (x 2 )L int (y 1 ) 0 > = i λ 4! ( ) d 4 y 1 < 0 T ˆφ in (x 1 )ˆφ in (x 2 )ˆφ 4 int (y 1) 0 >. We apply Wick s theorem. The result is sum over all contractions. We have 5.3 = 15 contractions in total However only two contractions are really distinct. These are: The disconnected diagram (free propagator times the figure of 8 diagram): We contract the two external points x 1 and x 2 together. The internal point y 1 can be contracted in 3.1 = 3 different ways. We have therefore three identical contributions coming from these three contractions. We get (0.13) 3 i( λ 4! )D F(x 1 x 2 ) d 4 zd F (0) 2 = 1 8 ( iλ) d 4 zd F (x 1 x 2 )D F (0) 2. (0.14) The connected diagram (tadpole): We contract one of the external points with one of the internal points. There are four different ways for doing this. The remaining external point must then be contracted with one of the remaining three internal points. There are three different ways for doing this. In total we have 4.3 = 12 contractions which lead to the same contribution. We have 12 i( λ 4! ) d 4 zd F (x 1 z)d F (x 2 z)d F (0) = 1 2 ( iλ) d 4 zd F (x 1 z)d F (x 2 z)d F (0). (0.15) Solution 1.v2 We want to check that U = e itĥ0 Ω. (0.16) We take the derivative with respect to time of both sides i t U = i t e itĥ0.ω+e itĥ0.i t Ω = Ĥ0U +e itĥ0.ˆv I Ω = Ĥ0U + ˆVe itĥ0 Ω = ĤU. (0.17) 6

Next we have ˆφ(t, x) = U 1 (t)ˆφ( x)u(t) = Ω 1 (t)ˆφ I (t, x)ω(t). (0.18) By using the result of the previous question we obtain immediately This gives immediately We start from A straightforward calculation leads to Next we start from We compute Ω 1 e itĥ0ˆφ( x)e itĥ0 Ω = Ω 1ˆφI (t, x)ω. (0.19) e itĥ0ˆφ( x)e itĥ0 = ˆφ I (t, x). (0.20) ˆφ(t, x) = Ω 1 (t)ˆφ I (t, x)ω(t). (0.21) i tˆφ(t, x) = Ω 1 i tˆφi Ω 1 +[ˆφ(t, x),ω 1 i t Ω] i tˆφ = i t U 1.ˆφU +U 1ˆφ.i t U 1 = U [Ĥ, ˆφ]U = Ω 1 i tˆφi Ω 1 +[ˆφ(t, x),ω 1ˆVI Ω] = Ω 1 i tˆφi Ω 1 +Ω 1 [ˆφ I, ˆV I ]Ω. (0.22) ˆφ(t, x) = U 1 (t)ˆφ( x)u(t). (0.23) = U 1 [Ĥ0, ˆφ]U U 1 [ˆV, ˆφ]U From (0.22) and (0.24) we conclude that Solution 2.v2 We start from = Ω 1 [Ĥ0,e itĥ0ˆφ( x)e itĥ0 ]Ω Ω 1 [ˆV I,e itĥ0ˆφ( x)e itĥ0 ]Ω = Ω 1 [Ĥ0,Ωˆφ(t, x)ω 1 ]Ω Ω 1 [ˆV I,Ωˆφ(t, x)ω 1 ]Ω = Ω 1 [Ĥ0, ˆφ I ]Ω Ω 1 [ˆV I, ˆφ I ]Ω. (0.24) i tˆφi = [ˆφ I,Ĥ0]. (0.25) i tˆφi = [ˆφ I,Ĥ0]. (0.26) 7

We compute immediately that Similarly starting from the result i tˆφi = e itĥ0 [ˆφ,Ĥ0]e itĥ0 = ie 1 itĥ0 e i p x itĥ0 ˆP( p)e V = i 1 e i p x ˆPI ( p) V = iˆπ I. (0.27) We compute i tˆπ I = [ˆπ I,Ĥ0], (0.28) i tˆπ I = e itĥ0 [ˆπ,Ĥ0]e itĥ0 = ie 1 itĥ0 e i p x E 2 itĥ0 p ˆQ( p)e V = i 1 e i p x E 2 V ˆQ p I ( p) = i 1 e i p x ( p 2 +m 2 )ˆQ I ( p) V = i 1 V ( 2 m 2 ) e i p x ˆQI ( p) From (0.27) and (0.29) we get the Klein-Gordon equation In other words ˆφ I is a free field. Solution 1.v3 First recall that = i( 2 m 2 )ˆφ I. (0.29) ( µ µ +m 2 )ˆφ I = 0. (0.30) < 0 T ˆφ(x)ˆφ(y) 0 >= θ(x 0 y 0 ) < 0 ˆφ(x)ˆφ(y) 0 > +θ(y 0 x 0 ) < 0 ˆφ(y)ˆφ(x) 0 >. (0.31) For x 0 > y 0 we compute < 0 T ˆφ(x)ˆφ(y) 0 > = < 0 ˆφ(x)ˆφ(y) 0 > d 3 p 1 = (2π) 3 2E( p) e ip(x y). (0.32) 8

Consider now the integral (ǫ > 0) dp 0 i dp 0 i I = 2π p 2 m 2 +iǫ e ip(x y) = 2π (p 0 )2 E 2 ( p)+iǫ e ip0 (x0 y0)+i p( x y). (0.33) There are two poles to the integrand at p 0 = ± E 2 ( p) iǫ. We enclose the pole in the lower half complex plane by a semicircle of infinite radius R. Clearly dz i y 0 )+i p( x y) Rde iθ i y = 0) e 2πz 2 E 2 ( p)+iǫ e iz(x0 2π R 2 e 2iθ E 2 ( p)+iǫ ersinθ(x0 ircosθ(x0 y 0 )+i p( x y) 0, R. (0.34) This is because sinθ < 0 and x 0 > y 0. Hence we can close the contour and write dz i I = 2πz 2 E 2 ( p)+iǫ e iz(x0 y0 )+i p( x y). (0.35) By using the residue theorem we have now (with z 0 = E 2 ( p) iǫ) I = (2πi).(z z 0 ) i 1 2π(z z 0 )(z +z 0 ) e iz 0(x0 y0) e i p( x y) = e ip(x y) 2E( p). (0.36) Now in the last equation p 0 = E( p). Thus for x 0 > y 0 we have < 0 T ˆφ(x)ˆφ(y) 0 d 3 p 1 > = (2π) 3 2E( p) e ip(x y) d 4 = (2π) 4 p 2 m 2 +iǫ e ip(x y). (0.37) For x 0 < y 0 the pole of interest is the one in the upper half complex plane and thus we must close the contour in the upper half complex plane. The rest of the calculation is similar. Solution 2. v3 We have for x 0 1 > x0 2 > x0 3 > x0 4. On the other hand D(x 1,x 2,x 3,x 4 ) = < 0 ˆφ(x 1 )ˆφ(x 2 )ˆφ(x 3 )ˆφ(x 4 ) 0 > = e ip 4x 4 < 0 â( p 1 )ˆφ(x 2 )ˆφ(x 3 )â + ( p 4 ) 0 >. (0.38) p 4 ˆφ(x 3 )â + ( p 4 ) 0 >= < 0 â( p 1 )ˆφ(x 2 ) = p 1 e ip 1x 1 1 2E( p4 ) e ip 4x 3 0 > + â + ( p 3 )â + ( p 4 ) 0 > e ip 3x 3. (0.39) p 3 1 2E( p1 ) < 0 eip 1x 2 + < 0 â( p 1 )â( p 2 )e ip 2x 2. (0.40) p 2 9

Hence { D(x 1,x 2,x 3,x 4 ) = e ip 1x 1 e ip 4x 4 e ip 2x 2 e ip 3x 3 < 0 â( p 1 )â( p 2 )â + ( p 3 )â + ( p 4 ) 0 > p 1 p 4 p 2 p } 3 1 1 + 2E( p1 ) 2E( p4 ) eip 1x 2 e ip 4x 3 = e ip 1x 1 e ip 4x 4 e ip 2x 2 e ip 3x 3 < 0 â( p 1 )â( p 2 )â + ( p 3 )â + ( p 4 ) 0 > p 1 p 4 p 2 p 3 + D F (x 1 x 2 )D F (x 3 x 4 ). (0.41) Use now < 0 â( p 1 )â( p 2 )â + ( p 3 )â + ( p 4 ) 0 >= (2π) 3 δ 3 ( p 1 p 4 )(2π) 3 δ 3 ( p 2 p 3 )+(2π) 3 δ 3 ( p 1 p 3 )(2π) 3 δ 3 ( p 2 p 4 ). (0.42) We get finally D(x 1,x 2,x 3,x 4 ) = D F (x 1 x 4 )D F (x 2 x 3 )+D F (x 1 x 3 )D F (x 2 x 4 )+D F (x 1 x 2 )D F (x 3 x 4 ). (0.43) 10