Representation Theory of Hopf Algebroids. Atsushi Yamaguchi

Similar documents
Descent on the étale site Wouter Zomervrucht, October 14, 2014

In the index (pages ), reduce all page numbers by 2.

HSP SUBCATEGORIES OF EILENBERG-MOORE ALGEBRAS

1 Categories, Functors, and Natural Transformations. Discrete categories. A category is discrete when every arrow is an identity.

Categories and Natural Transformations

GENERALIZED ABSTRACT NONSENSE: CATEGORY THEORY AND ADJUNCTIONS

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

Span, Cospan, and Other Double Categories

LIMITS AND COLIMITS. m : M X. in a category G of structured sets of some sort call them gadgets the image subset

Category Theory. Course by Dr. Arthur Hughes, Typset by Cathal Ormond

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

A NOTE ON SHEAVES WITHOUT SELF-EXTENSIONS ON THE PROJECTIVE n-space.

Math 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S)

University of Cape Town

VALUATIVE CRITERIA FOR SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

Math 248B. Base change morphisms

THE HOMOTOPY THEORY OF EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

GENERAL ABSTRACT NONSENSE

Joseph Muscat Categories. 1 December 2012

VALUATIVE CRITERIA BRIAN OSSERMAN

A CHARACTERIZATION OF CENTRAL EXTENSIONS IN THE VARIETY OF QUANDLES VALÉRIAN EVEN, MARINO GRAN AND ANDREA MONTOLI

Math 754 Chapter III: Fiber bundles. Classifying spaces. Applications

Cohomology operations and the Steenrod algebra

The Uniformity Principle on Traced Monoidal Categories

Toward a representation theory of the group scheme represented by the dual Steenrod algebra. Atsushi Yamaguchi

FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.

CLASS NOTES MATH 527 (SPRING 2011) WEEK 6

Algebraic Geometry I Lectures 22 and 23

Variations on a Casselman-Osborne theme

arxiv: v1 [math.ct] 27 Oct 2017

THE SNAIL LEMMA ENRICO M. VITALE

NOTES ON SPLITTING FIELDS

UMS 7/2/14. Nawaz John Sultani. July 12, Abstract

The basics of frame theory

PART I. Abstract algebraic categories

Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7)

SOME EXERCISES. This is not an assignment, though some exercises on this list might become part of an assignment. Class 2

Vector Bundles vs. Jesko Hüttenhain. Spring Abstract

3. Categories and Functors We recall the definition of a category: Definition 3.1. A category C is the data of two collections. The first collection

The Clifford algebra and the Chevalley map - a computational approach (detailed version 1 ) Darij Grinberg Version 0.6 (3 June 2016). Not proofread!

NORI FUNDAMENTAL GERBE OF ESSENTIALLY FINITE COVERS AND GALOIS CLOSURE OF TOWERS OF TORSORS

A CLASSIFICATION THEOREM FOR NORMAL EXTENSIONS MATHIEU DUCKERTS-ANTOINE AND TOMAS EVERAERT

CATEGORIES. 1.1 Introduction

Homotopy, Quasi-Isomorphism, and Coinvariants

Tangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007

CHOW S LEMMA. Matthew Emerton

THE COALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF CELL COMPLEXES

arxiv: v3 [math.at] 28 Feb 2014

E ring spectra and Hopf invariant one elements

Weak bisimulations for coalgebras over ordered functors

De Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)

2 Coherent D-Modules. 2.1 Good filtrations

ON KAN EXTENSION OF HOMOLOGY AND ADAMS COCOMPLETION

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem

Arrow-theoretic differential theory

Unstable modules over the Steenrod algebra revisited

THE GORENSTEIN DEFECT CATEGORY

Kathryn Hess. Conference on Algebraic Topology, Group Theory and Representation Theory Isle of Skye 9 June 2009

THE STRUCTURE OF THE CLASSIFYING RING OF FORMAL GROUPS WITH COMPLEX MULTIPLICATION.

arxiv: v1 [math.kt] 9 Jul 2018

Kathryn Hess. Category Theory, Algebra and Geometry Université Catholique de Louvain 27 May 2011

SYMMETRIC MONOIDAL G-CATEGORIES AND THEIR STRICTIFICATION

Probabilistic Observations and Valuations (Extended Abstract) 1

SPAN, COSPAN, AND OTHER DOUBLE CATEGORIES

Categorical Background (Lecture 2)

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2

OMEGA-CATEGORIES AND CHAIN COMPLEXES. 1. Introduction. Homology, Homotopy and Applications, vol.6(1), 2004, pp RICHARD STEINER

UNSTABLE MODULES OVER THE STEENROD ALGEBRA REVISITED

MADE-TO-ORDER WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS

RELATIVE HOMOLOGY. M. Auslander Ø. Solberg

DEFINITIONS: OPERADS, ALGEBRAS AND MODULES. Let S be a symmetric monoidal category with product and unit object κ.

ON PROPERTY-LIKE STRUCTURES

NATURAL WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS

How to glue perverse sheaves

Operads. Spencer Liang. March 10, 2015

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASSES 20 AND 21: BIVARIANT INTERSECTION THEORY

Hopf algebroids and the structure of MU (MU)

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.

Thus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j.

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

NAP Module 4. Homework 2 Friday, July 14, 2017.

ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF FUNCTORIAL FACTORIZATIONS FOR MODEL CATEGORIES

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ra] 12 Jan 2001

Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces are Complete for Dagger Compact Closed Categories (Extended Abstract)

Completed power operations for Morava E-theory

Algebraic Geometry

and this makes M into an R-module by (1.2). 2

3 3 Lemma and Protomodularity

We can choose generators of this k-algebra: s i H 0 (X, L r i. H 0 (X, L mr )

Categories and functors

LECTURE 2: THE THICK SUBCATEGORY THEOREM

Towards a Flowchart Diagrammatic Language for Monad-based Semantics

Representable presheaves

Fibrations of bicategories

MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA

D-Modules and Mixed Hodge Modules

MORITA EQUIVALENCE OF MANY-SORTED ALGEBRAIC THEORIES

Arithmetic invariant theory II

Math 762 Spring h Y (Z 1 ) (1) h X (Z 2 ) h X (Z 1 ) Φ Z 1. h Y (Z 2 )

1 Categorical Background

Transcription:

Representation Theory o H Algebroids Atsushi Yamaguchi

Contents o this slide 1. Internal categories and H algebroids (7p) 2. Fibered category o modules (6p) 3. Representations o H algebroids (7p) 4. Restrictions o representations (4p) 5. Let regular representations (3p) 6. Construction o let induced representations (12p)

1. Internal categories and H algebroids Let C be a category with inite limits. Deinition 1.1 An internal category in C consists o the ollowing data. (1) A pair (C 0, C 1 ) o objects o C. (2) Four morphisms,: C 1 C 0,: C 0 C 1, :C 1 C 1 C C0 1 pr 1 pr 2 o C, where C 1 C 1 C 1 C 1 is a limit o C 1 C 0 C 1, such that = = 1 C0 commute. C 0 and the ollowing diagrams pr C 1 pr 1 C 1 C 2 1 C C0 1 C 0 C 1 C 0 1 C 1 C 1 C 1 C 1 C 1 C 0 C 0 1 C 0 C 1 C 1 C 1 C 0 1 C 1 C 1 C0 (1, ) (, 1) C 1 C 1 C 1 1

We also have a notion o internal unctors between internal categories. Deinition 1.2 Let C = (C 0, C 1 ;,,, ) and D = (D 0, D 1 ;,,, ) be internal categories in C. An internal unctor rom C to D is a pair ( 0, 1 ) o morphisms 0 : C 0 D 0 and 1 : C 1 D 1 which make the ollowing diagrams commute. C 0 C 1 C 0 C 1 C 1 C 1 C 0 C 0 1 0 D 0 D 1 D 0 0 1 1 1 0 D 1 D 1 D 1 D 0 D 0

Let k be a commutative ring. We denote by Alg k the category o commutative graded k-algebras and homomorphisms between them. For objects A and B o Alg k, we deine maps i 1 : A A k B and i 2 : B A k B by i 1 (x) = x 1 and i 2 (y) = 1 y, respectively. Then, a diagram A i 1 i A k B 2 B is a croduct o A and B in Alg k. For morphisms, g : A B o Alg k, let I be the ideal o B generated by {(x) - g(x) x A }. Then the quotient map p : B B /I is a coequalizer o and g. Hence, Alg k is a category with inite colimits.

In other words, the posite category Alg k o Alg k is a category with inite limits. Thus we can consider the notion o internal categories in Alg k. Deinition 1.3 We call an internal category in Alg k a H algebroid. Namely, a H algebroid consists o the ollowing data. (1) A pair (A,) o objects o Alg k. (2) Four morphisms, : A, : A, : A o A A i 1 i A 2 A id A A A A Alg k, where A is a colimit o A, such that i 1 i 2 = = id A and the ollowing diagrams in Alg k are commutative. A id id id (1, ) (, 1) A

Deinition 1.4 Let = (A,;,,, ) and = (B, ;,,, ) be H algebroids in Alg k. An internal unctor rom to is make the ollowing diagrams commute. A called a morphism o H algebroids rom to. Namely, a morphism o H algebroids rom to is a pair ( 0, 1 ) o morphisms 0 : A B and 1 : which A 0 1 B B A A 0 1 1 1 0 B B

For a category C with inite limits and an object A o C, pr 1 pr 2 id A id A let A A A A A be a limit o A A A and d : A A A A the unique morphism that satisies pr 1 d = pr 2 d = id A. Then, d is an isomorphism and -1 (A, A ; id A, id A, id A, d ) is an internal category in C. Deinition 1.5 We call (A, A ; id A, id A, id A, d -1 ) the trivial internal category in C with object A o objects. We denote this by. Remark 1.6 For an internal category C = (C 0, C 1 ;,,, ) in C, (id C, ) : C is unique internal unctor rom C to 0 C 0 C0 whose irst component is the identity morphism o C 0. A

Deinition 1.7 For an object A o Alg k, the trivial internal category in Alg k with object A o objects is called the trivial H 0 algebroid over A and denote it by. Remark 1.8 A For a H algebroid = (A,;,,, ) in Alg k, it is clear that (id A, ) : A is unique morphism o H algebroids whose irst component is the identity map o A. We denote this morphism by e A. A Let : A A A A be the isomorphism that maps 1 to 1 1. Then, we have = (A, A ; id A, id A, id A, ). 0

2. Fibered category o modules For a commutative ring k, we denote by Mod k the category o graded k-modules and homomorphisms preserving degrees. We deine a category MOD as ollows. Ob MOD consists o triples (R, M,) where R Ob Alg k, M Ob Mod k and : M k R M is a right R -module structure o M. o morphisms Alg k (R, S ) the right diagram commutes. A morphism rom (R, M,) to (S, N,) is a pair (, ) and Mod k (M, N ) such that M k R N k S M k Composition o (, ) :(R, M,) (S, N,) and (, ):(S, N,) (T, L,) is deined to be (, ). N

Deine a unctor p : MOD Alg k by p(r, M,) = R and p(,) = For a morphism : S R o Alg k and an object (S, N,) o MOD, let : (N S R ) k R N S R be the ollowing composition. Here mdenotes the multiplication o R. morphisms o the orm (id R, ). (N S R ) k R N S (R k R ) N S R For an object R o Alg k, let MOD R be a subcategory o MOD consisting o objects o the orm (R, M,) and id N m

For a morphism : S R o Alg k, we deine unctors : MOD S MOD R : MOD R MOD S We can show the ollowing. Prosition 2.1 (Fibered category o modules) by (S, N,) = (R, N S R, ), (id S,) = (id R, S id R ) p : MOD Alg k is a ibered category. and (R, M,) = (S, M,(id M K )), (id S,) = (id R, ). Prosition 2.2 is a let adjoint o : MOD S MOD R. is called the inverse image unctor. For any morphism : R S o Alg k, : MOD R MOD S

Remark 2.3 For an object M = (R, M,) o MOD R and an object N = (S, N,) o MOD S, the natural bijection ad : MOD R ( (N), M) MOD S (N, (M)) maps (id R, ) :(N) M to (id S, i N ): N (M). Here, : N S R M and i N : N N S R is gven by i N (x) = x 1.

For morphisms : R S We also deine an isomorphism o MOD T, : S T o Alg k and an object M = (R, M,) o MOD R, we deine a morphism c c (M): ( )(M) (M), (M) : M R T (M R S ) S T, by c (M)(m t) = (m 1) t. Then, c (M) is an isomorphism.,, by c (M) = (id T, c (M)).,,

Let : R S,: T S, : S U be morphisms o Alg k and M = (R, M,) an object o MOD R, N = (T, N,) an object o MOD T. c For a morphism :(M) (N) o MOD S, we denote by (M), ( ) (M) (M) (N) ( ) (N) then, : M R U N T U is the ollowing composition. : ( ) (M) ( ) (N) the ollowing composition. ( ) c (N) c (N) N T U, -1 I = (id S,) or: M R S N T S and = (id U, ), c, (M) S id U M R U (M R S ) S U (N T S ) S U, -1

3. Representations o H algebroids Let = (A,;,,, ) be a H algebroid in Alg k. Deinition 3.1 A pair (M, ) o an object M o MOD A and a morphism : (M) (M) o MODis called a representation o on M i the ollowing conditions (A) and (U) are satisied. (A) The ollowing diagram in MODis commutative. i2 ( )(M) = (i 2 )(M) (i 2 )(M) = (i 1 )(M) (U) i1 ( )(M) = (i 1 )(M) : M = ( )(M) ( )(M) = M coincides with the identity morphism o M.

Prosition 3.2 For a morphism : (M) (M) o MOD, let : ˆ M (M) be the image o by the natural bijection ad : MOD A ( (M), (M)) MOD A (M, (M)). M We put = ˆ (id A, ) or : M M A. (1) satisies (A) o (3.1) i and only i the ollowing let diagram is commutative. (2) satisies (U) o (3.1) i and only i the ollowing right diagram is commutative. M A id M M A M A A M M A id id M M A A

Deinition 3.3 A pair (M, ) o right A -module M and a homomorphism : M Let M A o right A -modules which makes the : M ollowing diagrams commute is called a right M M A M M A id id M M A M A A Remark 3.4 e -comodule. id M M A A M A A be a map which maps x to x 1. Then, it is an isomorphism and (M, ) is a right -comodule. We call this a trivial -comodule. A e A

We deine the category Rep( ) o representations o a H algebroid as ollows. Objects o Rep( ) are representations o. For representations (M, ) and (N, ) o, the set : N M o MOD A commute. Rep( )((M, ), (N, )) o morphisms rom (M, ) to (N, ) consists o morphims which make the ollowing diagram (N) (M) (N) ( ) ( ) (M)

We deine the category Comod( ) o right -comodules as ollows. Objects o Comod( ) are right -comodules. For right -comodules (M, ) and (N, ), the set Comod( )((M, ), (N, )) o morphisms rom (M, ) to (N, ) consists o homo- morphisms : M N o right A -modules which make the ollowing diagram commute. M N M A id N A

Prosition 3.5 Let M = (A, M,) and N = (A, N,) be objects o MOD A. For representations (M, ) and (N, ) o, we put ad ( ) = (id A, ) and ad ( ) = (id A, ) or : M M A and : N N A. a morphism A homomorphism : N (id A,:(M, ) (N, ) o representations o i and only i is a morphism o right M o right A -modules deines : (N, ) (M, ) -comodules.

We deine a unctor as ollows. : Rep( ) Comod( ) For an object (M, ) o Rep( ), i M = (A, M,) and ad ( ) = (id A, ) or : M M A, we put (M, ) = (M, ). For a morphism (id A, :(M, ) (N, ) o Rep( ), i ad ( ) = (id A, ) or : M M A, we put (id A,) = ( : (N, ) (M, )). (M, ). Combining results so ar, we have the ollowing. We call (M, ) the right -comodule associated with Prosition 3.6 : Rep( ) Comod( ) is an isomorphism o categories.

4. Restrictions o representations Let = (A,;,,, ) and = (B, ;,,, ) be H algebroids in Alg k. For a morphism = ( 0, 1 ) : o H algebroids and a representation (M, ) o, we deine a morphism o MOD to be the ollowing composition. c (M) : ( 0 (M)) ( 0 (M)) 0, ( 0 (M)) ( 0 ) (M) = ( 1 ) (M) ( 1 ) (M) 1 c (M) -1 0, = ( 0 ) (M) ( 0 (M))

Prosition 4.1 (1) ( 0 (M), ) is a representation o on 0 (M). (2) I o We call ( 0 (M), ) the restriction o (M, ) along. deine a unctor : (M, ) (N, ) is a morphism o representations, 0 ( ) :( 0 (M), ) ( 0 (N), ) is a morphism o representations o. Deinition 4.2 For a morphism = ( 0, 1 ) : o H algebroids, we. : Rep( ) Rep( ). by (M, ) = ( 0. (M), ) and ( ) = 0 ( ) or an object (M, ) and a morphism : (M, ) (N, ) o Rep( ).

Prosition 4.3 For a representation (M, ) o on M = (A, M,), let (M, ) be the right -comodule associated with (M, ).. Then, the right -comodule ( (M, )) associated with. (M, ) is given as ollows. Deine a map by : (M A ) A B (M A B ) B ((x y) b) = (x 1) y (b) and let : M A B (M A B ) B M A B (M A ) A B (M A ) A B A id B be the ollowing composition. (id M A 1 ) A id B. Then, we have ( (M, )) = (M A B, ). (M A B ) B

Remark 4.4 I is the morphism e A = (id A, ) : A given in (1.8), 0 (M) = id A (M) = (A, M A A, ) is isomorphic to M. Since (id M A ) : M M A A maps x to x 1 and coincides with the identity morphism,. (e A (M, )) = (M A A, ) (3.4). : (M A A is isomorphic to a trivial -comodule (M, ) given in id A ) A A (M A A ) A A A e A A e

5. Let regular representations Let = (A,;,,, ) be a H algebroids in Alg k. We denote by U : Rep( ) MOD A the orgetul unctor. That is, U is given by U (M, ) = M and U ( ) =. Deine a unctor F id M A M A M A ( A ) (M A ) A F () = A id. : MOD A Comod( ) as ollows. For an object M = (A, M,) o MOD A, let : M A (M A ) A We put F (M) = (M A, ). For a morphism = (id A, ) : M N o MOD A, we put be the ollowing composition. M M

Let F : MOD A Rep( ) be the ollowing composition. Lemma 5.1 F MOD A Comod( ) Rep( ). (M, ) be the right -comodule associated with (M, ). -1 For a representation (M, ) o on M = (A, M,), let Then, : M M A deines a morphism o representations o. (id A, ) : F (M) (M, )

Prosition 5.2 For a representation (M, ) o and N an object o MOD A, let (M, ) be the right with (M, ) and we deine a map N ad : MOD A (N, U (M, )) Rep( )(F (N),(M, )) (M, ) N (M, ) by ad (id A, ) = (id A, F ( )). Then, ad is bijective. Hence F is a let adjoint o U. Deinition 5.3 For an object M o MOD A, we call F (M) the let regular regular representation associated with M. -comodule associated N (M, )

6. Construction o let induced representations Let = (A,;,,, ) and = (B, ;,,, ) be H algebroids in Alg k and = ( 0, 1 ) : a morphism o H algebroids. We deine maps by 0 (x) = 1 x and 0 : B A and : B B A (b) = b 1, respectively. Then, is cocartesian. A B 0 0 B A

Let M = (B, M,) an object o MOD B. Then, we have ( 0 ) (M) = (A, M B (B A ), (id M (B ) k( 0 ))). We regard M as a right A -module by on M A by ((x y) (b z)) = (-1) We also deine a map Lemma 6.1 deine a right B A -module strcture (x y) = x (1 y). The ollowing morphism is an isomorphism in MOD A. (id A, ):(A, M A, (id M k ( 0 ))) ( 0 ) (M) A B A :(M A ) k (B A ) M A : M A M B (B A ) by deg(y)deg(b) (id M k 0 ) and (x b) yz.

We put = (id M k ( 0 )) and identiy ( 0 ) (M) with (A, M A A, ) by (id A, ) below. Deine a homomorphism (M): M A (M A ) A Thus we have a unctor MOD B Comod( ) by assigning an object M = (B, M,) o MOD B to (M A, ˆ (M)). We put (M A, ˆ (M)) = (( 0 ) (M), (M)). ˆ o right A -module to be the ollowing composition. (M A id M A M A M A ( A ) (M A ) A Prosition 6.2, ˆ (M)) is a right -comodule. -1 l

For a representation (M, ) o on M = (B, M,), we put (M, ) = (M, ). Here is a homomorphism 1 2 is the ollowing composition. A id M A (M B id M A (( 1 A id ) ) ) A M B ( A ) M A M A ( A ) M B ( A ) 0 : M M B o right B -modules. We deine homomorphisms o right A -modules 1, : M A M B ( A ) as ollows. is the ollowing composition. 2 0 Here, is the quotient map induced by 0 : A B.

Let us denote by : K(M,; ) M A the kernel o - : M A M B ( A ). 1 2 (M, ) We assume that : A is lat. Then, is the kernel o A id - A id : (M A ) A (M B ( A )) A. 1 2 (M, ) A id : K(M,; ) A (M A ) A Then, the ollowing diagram is commutative. (M, ) K(M,; ) (M, ) ˆ(M) M A M A (M A ) A ˆ(M) (M A ) A 1 A id (M B ( A )) A 2 A id

There exists unique homomorphism o right A -modules l (M): K(M,; ) K(M,; ) A that makes the ollowing diagram commute. Prosition 6.3 K(M,; ) (M, ) M A l (M) K(M,; ) A ˆ(M) (K(M,; ), (M)) is a right (M, ) l l (M A ) A (M, ) A id -comodule and :(K(M,; ), (M)) (M A, (M)) ˆ is a morphism o right -comodules.

Let M = (B, M,) and N = (B, N,) be objects o MOD B. For a morphism (id A, :(M, ) (N, ) be o representa- tions o, we put (M, ) = (M, ) and (N, ) = (N, ). :(N, ) (M, ) is a morphism o right -comodules. Since is natural in morphism o right 1 : K(N,; ) K(M,; ) K(N,; ) N A A id -comodules and is natural in homomorphism o right B -modules, there 2 exists unique homomorphism o right A -modules that makes the ollowing diagram commute. K(M,; ) (N, ) (M, ) M A

Prosition 6.4 l :(K(N,; ),(N)) (K(M,; ),(M)) is a morphism o right We deine a unctor -1 -comodules.! : Rep( ) Rep( ) l by! (M, ) = (K(M,; ),(M)) and! (id B, ) = (id A, ) or an object (M, ) and a morphism (id B, ) :(M, ) (N, ) o Rep( ). Theorem 6.5! is a let adjoint o.. l We call! (M, ) the let induced representation o (M, ) associated with.

For an object M = (B, M,) o MOD B, we deine a map M :(M A ) A B M ( ) : K(M,; ) A B M K(M,; ) A B (M A ) A B M We put (M, ) = (M, ). Then, by M ((x y) b) = (x 0 ( (y))b) and i (M, ) is an object o Rep( ), let us deine (M, ) to be the ollowing composition. Prosition 6.6 is a morphism o right (M, ) A id B -comodules. M ( ) :(K(M,; ) A B,((M)) ) (M, ) (M, ) l

Let (N, ) be a representation o and (M, ) a represen- tation o ad (M, ) (N, ). Put M = (B, M,) and N = (A, N,). We also right -comodules, ad put (M, ) = (M, ) and (N, ) = (N, ). We deine a map : Comod( )((N, ), (K(M,; ),(M))) Comod( )((N A B, ),(M, )) below. For a morphism : (N, ) (K(M,; ),(M)) o (M, ) (N, ) ( ) is the ollowing composition. A id B ( ) N A B K(M,; ) A B M l (M, ) l

Prosition 6.7 ad (M, ) (N, ) is bijective. Since we have the ollowing equalities, the above result shows that we have the ollowing natural bijection. Rep( )(! (M, ), (N, )) Rep( )((M, ), (N, )). This shows Theorem 6.5. -1! (M, ) = (K(M,; ),(M)) l. -1 (N, ) = (N A B, )

Remark 6.8 For an object M = (A, M,) o MOD A, we consider the the trivial right -comodule (M, ) and denote by A e (M, ) the representation which is mapped to (M, ) by M induced representation e A! (M, ) associated with e A = (id A, ) : isomorphic to the let regular e For a H algebroid in Alg k, we claim that the let representation o on M. In act, or a representation. (N, ) o, the A -comodule associated with e A (N, ) is isomorphic to the trivial right -comodule by (4.4), U : Rep( A A the orgetul unctor U : Rep( ) Comod( ). A A A A M )((M, ), e A (N, )) MOD A (M, N). A. A gives a bijection M

Thank you or listening and your patience.