BEAM INSTABILITIES IN LINEAR MACHINES 1.

Similar documents
Space Charge Mi-ga-on

Space Charge in Linear Machines

BEAM INSTABILITIES IN LINEAR MACHINES 2

Accelerator physics: basic principles on beam focusing and transport

Emittance Compensation. J.B. Rosenzweig ERL Workshop, Jefferson Lab 3/20/05

Low Emittance Machines

Lecture 4: Emittance Compensation. J.B. Rosenzweig USPAS, UW-Madision 6/30/04

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

Low Emittance Machines

RF LINACS. Alessandra Lombardi BE/ ABP CERN

Analysis of Slice Transverse Emittance Evolution in a Photocathode RF Gun. Abstract

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Linac Driven Free Electron Lasers (III)

Linac JUAS lecture summary

Physics 598ACC Accelerators: Theory and Applications

Low Emittance Electron Injectors

Longitudinal Beam Dynamics

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Transverse dynamics. Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory

ELECTRON DYNAMICS WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

SC forces RMS Envelope SC Child Langmuir law SCC Simulation Codes LEBT Simulation

Practical Lattice Design

Introduction. Thermoionic gun vs RF photo gun Magnetic compression vs Velocity bunching. Probe beam design options

Introduction to electron and photon beam physics. Zhirong Huang SLAC and Stanford University

Diagnostic Systems for Characterizing Electron Sources at the Photo Injector Test Facility at DESY, Zeuthen site

Simulation of transverse emittance measurements using the single slit method

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Self-consistent analysis of three dimensional uniformly charged ellipsoid with zero emittance

Particle Accelerators: Transverse Beam Dynamics

Accelerator Physics Issues of ERL Prototype

USPAS Accelerator Physics 2017 University of California, Davis. Chapter 11: Space Charge Effects Space Charge, Beam-Beam

Introduction to Collider Physics

Beam halo formation in high-intensity beams

FACET-II Design Update

ASTRA simulations of the slice longitudinal momentum spread along the beamline for PITZ

Dark Current at Injector. Jang-Hui Han 27 November 2006 XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. Design Studies of Positron Collection for the NLC

PBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

E. Wilson - CERN. Components of a synchrotron. Dipole Bending Magnet. Magnetic rigidity. Bending Magnet. Weak focusing - gutter. Transverse ellipse

Time resolved transverse and longitudinal phase space measurements at the high brightness photo injector PITZ

A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac

Transverse Dynamics II

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

Fundamental Concepts of Particle Accelerators III : High-Energy Beam Dynamics (2) Koji TAKATA KEK. Accelerator Course, Sokendai. Second Term, JFY2012

Recent developments in the Dutch Laser Wakefield Accelerators program at the University of Twente: New external bunch injection scheme.

Compton Scattering I. 1 Introduction

FACET-II Design, Parameters and Capabilities

Beam Dynamics in Synchrotrons with Space- Charge

Modeling of Space Charge Effects and Coherent Synchrotron Radiation in Bunch Compression Systems. Martin Dohlus DESY, Hamburg

TWISS FUNCTIONS. Lecture 1 January P.J. Bryant. JUAS18_01- P.J. Bryant - Lecture 1 Twiss functions

Introduction to Accelerators. Scientific Tools for High Energy Physics and Synchrotron Radiation Research

Small Synchrotrons. Michael Benedikt. CERN, AB-Department. CAS, Zeegse, 30/05/05 Small Synchrotrons M. Benedikt 1

Accelerator Physics NMI and Synchrotron Radiation. G. A. Krafft Old Dominion University Jefferson Lab Lecture 16

Extensions of the Longitudinal Envelope Equation

Andreas Kabel Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Power efficiency vs instability (or, emittance vs beam loading) Sergei Nagaitsev, Valeri Lebedev, and Alexey Burov Fermilab/UChicago Oct 18, 2017

Beam Dynamics with Space- Charge

Introduction to particle accelerators

Simulations of the IR/THz source at PITZ (SASE FEL and CTR)

LCLS-II SCRF start-to-end simulations and global optimization as of September Abstract

PAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

PBL (Problem-Based Learning) scenario for Accelerator Physics Mats Lindroos and E. Métral (CERN, Switzerland) Lund University, Sweden, March 19-23,

Part III. Interaction with Single Electrons - Plane Wave Orbits

HOMDYN STUDY FOR THE LCLS RF PHOTO-INJECTOR

Envelope and Matrix Codes (TRACE 3-D & TRANSPORT Introduction)

Beam instabilities (I)

SPACE CHARGE NEUTRALIZATION AND ITS DYNAMIC EFFECTS

Beam Diagnostics Lecture 3. Measuring Complex Accelerator Parameters Uli Raich CERN AB-BI

4. Statistical description of particle beams

Investigation of the Effect of Space Charge in the compact-energy Recovery Linac

50 MeV 1.4 GeV 25GeV 450 GeV 8 TeV. Sources of emittance growth CAS 07 Liverpool. Sept D. Möhl, slide 1

2. Passage of Radiation Through Matter

Introduction to Accelerators

Novel, Hybrid RF Injector as a High-average. Dinh Nguyen. Lloyd Young

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

LCLS S-band Structure Coupler

Γ f Σ z Z R

Photoinjector design for the LCLS

Longitudinal dynamics Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN

Lecture 2: Modeling Accelerators Calculation of lattice functions and parameters. X. Huang USPAS, January 2015 Hampton, Virginia

X-band Photoinjector Beam Dynamics

TUNE SPREAD STUDIES AT INJECTION ENERGIES FOR THE CERN PROTON SYNCHROTRON BOOSTER

Chad Mitchell Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting Aug. 19, 2015

Cooled-HGHG and Coherent Thomson Sca ering

r,t r R Z j ³ 0 1 4π² 0 r,t) = 4π

Magnets and Lattices. - Accelerator building blocks - Transverse beam dynamics - coordinate system

Potential use of erhic s ERL for FELs and light sources ERL: Main-stream GeV e - Up-gradable to 20 + GeV e -

Lund/Barnard USPAS Problem 1

Introduction to Transverse Beam Dynamics

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)533. First Physics Results of AWAKE, a Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment at CERN. Patric Muggli, Allen Caldwell

High-Fidelity RF Gun Simulations with the Parallel 3D Finite Element Particle-In-Cell Code Pic3P

ELECTRON DYNAMICS with SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

Synchrotron Motion with Space-Charge

The Accelerator Hamiltonian in a Straight Coordinate System

Wakefield computations for the LCLS Injector (Part I) *

Electron Linear Accelerators & Free-Electron Lasers

Transcription:

BEAM INSTABILITIES IN LINEAR MACHINES 1 Massimo.Ferrario@LNF.INFN.IT CERN 4 November 2015

SELF FIELDS AND WAKE FIELDS The realm of collecdve effects Direct self fields Image self fields Space Charge Wake fields

OUTLINE The rms emijance concept rms envelope equadon Space charge forces Beam/Envelope emijance oscilladons Matching condidons in a linac and emijance compensadon

Trace space of an ideal laminar beam " x $ # x! = dx dz = p x $ % p z p x << p z X X

Trace space of a laminar beam X X

Trace space of non laminar beam X X

Geometric emittance: Ellipse equation: ε g γx 2 + 2αx x $ + β x $ 2 = ε g Twiss parameters: βγ α 2 = 1! Ellipse area: A = πε g β = 2α

Trace space evolution No space charge => cross over X With space charge => no cross over X X X

rms emittance σ x' x σ x ε rms + + f x,! x ( x )dx d x! =1 f! x, x! rms beam envelope: + + σ x 2 = x 2 = x 2 f ( x, x &)dxd x & Define rms emittance: ( ) = 0 γx 2 + 2αx $ x + β $ x 2 = ε rms such that: σ x = x 2 = βε rms σ x' = x! 2 = γε rms Since: α = β $ 2 β = x2 ε rms it follows: α = 1 2ε rms d dz x 2 = x x % ε rms = σ xx' ε rms

σ x = x 2 = βε rms σ x' = x '2 = γε rms σ xx' = x x! = αε rms It holds also the relation: γβ α 2 = 1 Substituting α,β,γ we get 2 2 σ x' σ x " σ xx' $ ε rms ε rms # ε rms % ' & 2 =1 We end up with the definition of rms emittance in terms of the second moments of the distribution: ε rms = ( x 2 ) σ x2 σ 2 x' σ 2 xx' = x 2 x" 2 x "

Which distribution has no correlations? σ xx' = x x! = αε rms = 0? x x

What does rms emittance tell us about phase space distributions under linear or non-linear forces acting on the beam? x 2 ε rms = x 2 x # 2 x x # 2 x a a a x a x Assuming a generic x, x " correlation of the type: x! = Cx n When n = 1 ==> ε rms = 0 2 ε rms = C 2 ( x 2 x 2n x n+1 2 ) When n = 1 ==> ε rms = 0

Constant under linear transformation only And without acceleration: " x = p x p z

Normalized rms emittance: ε n,rms Canonical transverse momentum: p x = p z x! = m o cβγ x! p z p ε n,rms = σ x2 σ 2 px σ 2 xpx = 1 m o c ( x 2 2 2 p x xp ) βγ ε x rms Liouville theorem: the density of particles n, or the volume V occupied by a given number of particles in phase space (x,p x,y,p y,z,p z ) remains invariant under conservative forces. It hold also in the projected phase spaces (x,p x ),(y,p y )(,z,p z ) provided that there are no couplings

OUTLINE The rms emijance concept rms envelope equadon Space charge forces Beam/Envelope emijance oscilladons Matching condidons in a linac and emijance compensadon

Envelope Equation without Acceleration Now take the derivatives: dσ x dz = d dz d 2 σ x dz 2 = d dz x 2 = 1 2σ x σ x x! = 1 dσ x x! σ x σ x dz d dz x2 = 1 2 x x! = σ x x! 2σ x σ x σ 2 x x! σ = 1 x! 2 + x x! 3 x σ x 2 x ( ) σ x! σ x 3 = σ! 2 x + x x!! 2 x σ x! 3 σ x σ x And simplify: σ!! x = σ 2 xσ 2 2 x' σ xx' + x x!! 3 σ x σ x = ε 2 rms σ + x x!! 3 x σ x We obtain the rms envelope equation in which the rms emittance enters as defocusing pressure like term. σ!! x x x!! σ x = ε 2 rms 3 σ x

σ!! x x x!! σ x = ε 2 rms 3 σ x Assuming that each particle is subject only to a linear focusing force, without acceleration: x!! + k 2 x x = 0 take the average over the entire particle ensemble 2 σ x " + k 2 x σ x = ε rms σ x 3 2 x x!! = k x x 2 We obtain the rms envelope equation with a linear focusing force in which the rms emittance enters as defocusing pressure like term. 2 ε rms σ T 3 x V P

S = kn log( πε)

OUTLINE The rms emijance concept rms envelope equadon Space charge forces Beam/Envelope emijance oscilladons Matching condidons in a linac and emijance compensadon

Space Charge: what does it mean? The net effect of the Coulomb interactions in a multi-particle system can be classified into two regimes: 1) Collisional Regime ==> dominated by binary collisions caused by close particle encounters ==> Single Particle Effects 2) Space Charge Regime ==> dominated by the self field produced by the particle distribution, which varies appreciably only over large distances compare to the average separation of the particles ==> Collective Effects

Continuous Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model I ρ = π R 2 v R J = I π R 2 Gauss s law ε o E ds = Ampere s law ρdv I E r = 2πε o R 2 v r for r R I 1 E r = 2πε o v r for r > R Ir B dl = µ o J ds B ϑ = µ o 2πR for r R 2 I B ϑ = µ o for r > R 2πr B ϑ = β c E r

Bunched Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model L(t) R(t) (0,0) s l v z = βc Longitudinal Space Charge field in the bunch moving frame: ρ = Q πr 2 L E z s,r = 0 ( ) = ρ 4πε o R 2 π L ( l s ) rdrdϕd l & ( l s ) 2 + r 2 3 / 2 ) 0 0 0 '( * + E z ( s,r = 0) = ρ % 2ε 0 &' ( ) R 2 + ( L s ) 2 R 2 + s 2 + 2 s L ( )*

Radial Space Charge field in the bunch moving frame by series representation of axisymmetric field: $ E r (r, s) ρ & % ε 0 s ' E z (0, s) ) r ( 2 + [ ] r3 16 + E r (r, s ) = ρ 2ε 0 % ' &' ( L s ) R 2 + ( L + s ) 2 s R 2 + s 2 ( * )* r 2

Lorentz Transformation to the Lab frame E z = E z E r = γ E r L = γl ρ = ρ γ s = γs E z (0,s) = ρ & R 2 + γ 2 (L s) 2 R 2 + γ 2 s 2 + γ 2s L γ 2ε 0 '( ( ) ) * + E r (r,s) = γρ & ( (L s) 2ε 0 ( + ' R 2 + γ 2 (L s) 2 s R 2 + γ 2 s 2 ) + r + 2 * It is still a linear field with r but with a longitudinal correlation s

Bunched Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model E z (0,s,γ ) = I 2πγε 0 R 2 βc h s,γ ( ) E r (r,s,γ ) = Ir 2πε 0 R 2 βc g s,γ ( ) γ= 1 γ = 5 γ = 10 R s (t) L(t) Δt

Lorentz Force F r = e( E r βcb ϑ ) = e( 1 β 2 )E r = ee r γ 2 is a linear function of the transverse coordinate dp r dt = F r = ee r γ 2 = eir 2πγ 2 ε 0 R 2 βc g s,γ ( ) The attractive magnetic force, which becomes significant at high velocities, tends to compensate for the repulsive electric force. Therefore space charge defocusing is primarily a non-relativistic effect. F x = eix 2πγ 2 ε 0 σ x2 βc g s,γ ( )

Envelope Equation with Space Charge Single particle transverse motion: dp x dt d dt x!! = = F x p x = p x! = βγm o c x! ( p x! ) = βc d dz p x! F x βcp ( ) = F x F x = eix 2πγ 2 ε 0 σ x2 βc g s,γ ( ) x!! = k sc s,γ ( ) σ x 2 x

Now we can calculate the term x x " that enters in the envelope equation σ!! x = ε 2 rms σ + x x!! 3 x σ x!! x = k sc σ x 2 x x x!! = k sc σ x 2 x 2 =k sc Including all the other terms the envelope equation reads: σ!! x + k 2 σ x = Space Charge De-focusing Force ε n 2 ( βγ) 2 σ + k sc 3 x σ x Emittance Pressure External Focusing Forces Laminarity Parameter: ( ρ = βγ ) 2 2 k sc σ x 2 ε n

The beam undergoes two regimes along the accelerator σ x " + k 2 σ x = ε n 2 ( βγ) 2 σ + k sc 3 x σ x ρ>>1 Laminar Beam σ x " + k 2 σ x = ε n 2 ( βγ) 2 σ + k sc 3 x σ x ρ<<1 Thermal Beam

OUTLINE The rms emijance concept rms envelope equadon Space charge forces Beam/Envelope emijance oscilladons Matching condidons in a linac and emijance compensadon

Surface charge density Surface electric field Restoring force Plasma frequency Plasma oscillations

Neutral Plasma Oscillations Instabilities EM Wave propagation Single Component Cold Relativistic Plasma Magnetic focusing Magnetic focusing

( ) σ " + k 2 s σ = k sc s,γ σ Equilibrium solution: ( ) = k sc( s,γ ) σ eq s,γ k s Single Component Relativistic Plasma k s = qb 2mcβγ Small perturbation: σ( ζ ) = σ eq ( s) +δσ ( s) δ σ # s ( ) + 2k 2 s δσ ( s) = 0 δσ ( s) = δσ o ( s)cos( 2k s z) Perturbed trajectories oscillate around the equilibrium with the same frequency but with different amplitudes: σ( s) = σ eq ( s) +δσ o ( s)cos( 2k s z)

σ eq ( s) Perturbed trajectories oscillate around the equilibrium with the same frequency but with different amplitudes: σ ( s) = σ eq ( s) +δσ o ( s)cos( 2k s z)

ε rms = σ x2 σ 2 x' σ 2 xx' sin( 2k s z)

Emittance Oscillations are driven by space charge differential defocusing in core and tails of the beam p x Projected Phase Space x Slice Phase Spaces

Perturbed trajectories oscillate around the equilibrium with the same frequency but with different amplitudes X X

Elliptical cross section bunch E y = I βcπε o y Y X + Y ( ) E r = I 2βcπε o R 2 r Y R* R * = X + Y 2 X E x = I βcπε o x X X + Y ( ) E x ( X, z) = E y ( Y,z) = E ( r R *,z)

OUTLINE The rms emijance concept rms envelope equadon Space charge forces Beam/Envelope emijance oscilladons Matching condidons in a linac and emijance compensadon

High Brightness Photo-Injector

Envelope Equation with Longitudinal Acceleration p o = γ o m o β o c p x << p o p = p o + p! z p! = ( βγ)! m o c dp x dt x!! +! = d ( p x! ) = βc d ( dt dz p x! ) = 0 p!! p x! = 0 ( x = βγ )! βγ x! x x!! ( = βγ )! βγ x x! ( = βγ )! βγ σ xx' σ!! x = ε 2 rms σ + x x!! 3 x σ x dσ x dz = σ! = σ xx' x σ x Space Charge De-focusing Force Adiabatic Damping ( )! σ!! x + βγ βγ σ! x + k 2 σ x = ε n 2 ( βγ) 2 σ + k sc 3 x σ x Emittance Pressure Other External Focusing Forces ε n = βγε rms

Beam subject to strong acceleration σ!! x + γ! σ! x + k 2 RF γ γ 2 σ = ε 2 n x γ 2 σ + k o sc 3 x γ 3 σ x We must include also the RF focusing force: 2 k RF =! γ 2 2 k o sc = 2I g( s,γ ) I A

σ x " + γ " σ " x + k RF γ γ 2 σ x = 2 ε 2 n γ 2 3 σ + x k o sc γ 3 σ x γ = 1 +αz ==> γ " = 0 Looking for an equilibrium solution σ inv = σ o γ n ==> all terms must have the same dependence on γ σ " inv = nσ o γ n 1 γ " σ inv " = n( n 1)σ o γ n 2 " γ 2 n( n 1)σ o γ n 2 γ % 2 + nσ o γ n 2 γ % 2 + k 2 RF σ o γ n 2 = k sc o γ 3 n σ x n 2 = 3 n n = 1 2

σ x " + γ " σ " x + k RF γ γ 2 σ x = 2 ε 2 n γ 2 3 σ + x k o sc γ 3 σ x γ = 1 +αz ==> γ " = 0 Looking for an equilibrium solution σ inv = σ o γ n ==> all terms must have the same dependence on γ Laminar beam Thermal beam ρ >> 1 n = 1 2 ρ << 1 n = 0 σ q = σ o γ σ ε = σ o

Space charge dominated beam (Laminar) σ q = 1 γ # 2I I A γ Emittance dominated beam (Thermal) σ ε = 2ε n γ $

σ q = 1 γ # 2I I A γ This solution represents a beam equilibrium mode that turns out to be the transport mode for achieving minimum emittance at the end of the emittance correction process

An important property of the laminar beam σ q = 1 γ # 2I I A γ σ q ' = 2I I A γ 3 Constant phase space angle: δ = γσ ' q σ q = γ & 2 p x p x δ X δ X

Laminarity parameter ρ = 2Iσ 2 γi A ε 2Iσ 2 q 2 n γi A ε = 4I 2 2 n γ ' 2 I 2 A ε 2 n γ 2 Transition Energy (ρ=1) γ tr = 2I # γ I A ε n ρ I=4 ka ε th = 0.6 µm E acc = 25 MV/m I=1 ka Potential space charge emittance growth I=100 A ρ = 1

Matching Conditions with a TW Linac γ tr = 2I # γ I A ε n 150 MeV σ ' = 0 σ q = 1 # γ 2I I A γ 25 MV/m

z=0.23891 0.05 z=1.5 z=10 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 Pr 0 Pr 0 pr_[rad] 0-0.02-0.02-0.04-0.05 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 3.5 0 0.0008 0.0016 0.0024 0.0032 0.004 R [m] R [m] -0.04 0 0.0008 0.0016 0.0024 0.0032 0.004 R_[m] 3 2.5 2 rms norm. emittance [um] rms beam size [mm] 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.004 0.0035 0.003 Gun Linac 0 2 4 6 8 10 z=0.23891 z=1.5 Z=10 0.004 0.004 0.0035 Z_[m] 0.0035 0.003 0.003 Rs [m] 0.0025 0.002 0.0015 0.001 0.0005 Rs [m] 0.0025 0.002 0.0015 0.001 0.0005 Rs [m] 0.0025 0.002 0.0015 0.001 0.0005 0-0.003-0.002-0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 Zs-Zb [m] 0-0.003-0.002-0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 Zs-Zb [m] 0-0.003-0.002-0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0.003 Zs-Zb [m]

Emittance Compensation for a SC dominated beam: Controlled Damping of Plasma Oscillations ε n oscillations are driven by Space Charge propagation close to the laminar solution allows control of ε n oscillation phase ε n sensitive to SC up to the transition energy

References:

Emittance and Entropy The entropy of the definition: distribution is by For large N, n, Stirling's formula gives: is the number of ways in which the points can be assigned to the cells to produce the given distribution If A is sufficiently small, the summation may be replaced by an integral to give: ρ dx d x! = N

Emittance and Entropy The entropy of the definition: distribution is by Consider a distribution in which the density is uniform and bounded by an ellipse of area πε and: ρ = n A = N πε ρ dx d x! = N S o = log N " ( ) log$ AN # % ' = log πε πε & ( ) log( A)

Envelope oscillations drive Emittance oscillations σ(z) ε(z) ε rms = ( x 2 ) sin 2k s z σ 2 x σ 2 x' σ 2 xx' = x 2 x % 2 x % ( )

energy spread induces decoherence σ(z) ε(z)