Scattering of two identical particles in the center-of. of-mass frame. (b)

Similar documents
Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

Specification -- Assumptions of the Simple Classical Linear Regression Model (CLRM) 1. Introduction

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Scattering cross section (scattering width)

Small signal analysis

Harmonic oscillator approximation

14 The Postulates of Quantum mechanics

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

2. SINGLE VS. MULTI POLARIZATION SAR DATA

HW #6, due Oct Toy Dirac Model, Wick s theorem, LSZ reduction formula. Consider the following quantum mechanics Lagrangian,

A how to guide to second quantization method.

Root Locus Techniques

The Dirac Equation for a One-electron atom. In this section we will derive the Dirac equation for a one-electron atom.

Pythagorean triples. Leen Noordzij.

Statistical Properties of the OLS Coefficient Estimators. 1. Introduction

Lagrangian Field Theory

The Feynman path integral

Canonical transformations

Now that we have laws or better postulates we should explore what they imply

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

Mathematical Preparations

HW #3. 1. Spin Matrices. HW3-soln-improved.nb 1. We use the spin operators represented in the bases where S z is diagonal:

The multivariate Gaussian probability density function for random vector X (X 1,,X ) T. diagonal term of, denoted

Lecture 20: Noether s Theorem

EPR Paradox and the Physical Meaning of an Experiment in Quantum Mechanics. Vesselin C. Noninski

n α j x j = 0 j=1 has a nontrivial solution. Here A is the n k matrix whose jth column is the vector for all t j=0

Note 2. Ling fong Li. 1 Klein Gordon Equation Probablity interpretation Solutions to Klein-Gordon Equation... 2

From Biot-Savart Law to Divergence of B (1)

Chapter 11. Supplemental Text Material. The method of steepest ascent can be derived as follows. Suppose that we have fit a firstorder

Density matrix. c α (t)φ α (q)

Chapter 6 The Effect of the GPS Systematic Errors on Deformation Parameters

CHAPTER 9 LINEAR MOMENTUM, IMPULSE AND COLLISIONS

Classical Field Theory

Physics 443, Solutions to PS 7

Additional File 1 - Detailed explanation of the expression level CPD

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

Module 1 : The equation of continuity. Lecture 1: Equation of Continuity

Mechanics Physics 151

PHYS 215C: Quantum Mechanics (Spring 2017) Problem Set 3 Solutions

Lorentz Group. Ling Fong Li. 1 Lorentz group Generators Simple representations... 3

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS For the Case of Two Regressors

Mechanics Physics 151

Rate of Absorption and Stimulated Emission

1 Vectors over the complex numbers

Quantum Mechanics I Problem set No.1

Variable Structure Control ~ Basics

ψ ij has the eigenvalue

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

763622S ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHANICS Solution Set 1 Spring c n a n. c n 2 = 1.

Recursive Construction of the Bosonic Bogoliubov Vacuum State

The Multiple Classical Linear Regression Model (CLRM): Specification and Assumptions. 1. Introduction

2.3 Least-Square regressions

CHAPTER 14 GENERAL PERTURBATION THEORY

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

Homework & Solution. Contributors. Prof. Lee, Hyun Min. Particle Physics Winter School. Park, Ye

This model contains two bonds per unit cell (one along the x-direction and the other along y). So we can rewrite the Hamiltonian as:

Note on the Electron EDM

9 Lorentz Invariant phase-space

where the sums are over the partcle labels. In general H = p2 2m + V s(r ) V j = V nt (jr, r j j) (5) where V s s the sngle-partcle potental and V nt

Physics 181. Particle Systems

8 Waves in Uniform Magnetized Media

QED: Quantum Electrodynamics

Lecture 10. Reading: Notes and Brennan Chapter 5

Improvements on Waring s Problem

10.40 Appendix Connection to Thermodynamics and Derivation of Boltzmann Distribution

Phys304 Quantum Physics II (2005) Quantum Mechanics Summary. 2. This kind of behaviour can be described in the mathematical language of vectors:

The gravitational field energy density for symmetrical and asymmetrical systems

CHAPTER X PHASE-CHANGE PROBLEMS

Electromagnetic scattering. Graduate Course Electrical Engineering (Communications) 1 st Semester, Sharif University of Technology

Snce h( q^; q) = hq ~ and h( p^ ; p) = hp, one can wrte ~ h hq hp = hq ~hp ~ (7) the uncertanty relaton for an arbtrary state. The states that mnmze t

Tensor Analysis. For orthogonal curvilinear coordinates, ˆ ˆ (98) Expanding the derivative, we have, ˆ. h q. . h q h q

Team. Outline. Statistics and Art: Sampling, Response Error, Mixed Models, Missing Data, and Inference

A particle in a state of uniform motion remain in that state of motion unless acted upon by external force.

Week3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity

9 Characteristic classes

Mechanics Physics 151

November 5, 2002 SE 180: Earthquake Engineering SE 180. Final Project

Linear Approximation with Regularization and Moving Least Squares

Poisson brackets and canonical transformations

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformation II

Workshop: Approximating energies and wave functions Quantum aspects of physical chemistry

arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 3 Jan 2006

5.03, Inorganic Chemistry Prof. Daniel G. Nocera Lecture 2 May 11: Ligand Field Theory

Solutions to exam in SF1811 Optimization, Jan 14, 2015

Physics 111. CQ1: springs. con t. Aristocrat at a fixed angle. Wednesday, 8-9 pm in NSC 118/119 Sunday, 6:30-8 pm in CCLIR 468.

coordinates. Then, the position vectors are described by

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

Srednicki Chapter 34

CHAPTER 5: Lie Differentiation and Angular Momentum

Nice plotting of proteins II

COMPLEX NUMBERS AND QUADRATIC EQUATIONS

Change. Flamenco Chuck Keyser. Updates 11/26/2017, 11/28/2017, 11/29/2017, 12/05/2017. Most Recent Update 12/22/2017

STAT 511 FINAL EXAM NAME Spring 2001

This appendix presents the derivations and proofs omitted from the main text.

2.3 Nilpotent endomorphisms

SIO 224. m(r) =(ρ(r),k s (r),µ(r))

5.76 Lecture #5 2/07/94 Page 1 of 10 pages. Lecture #5: Atoms: 1e and Alkali. centrifugal term ( +1)

Solutions to Exercises in Astrophysical Gas Dynamics

Lecture Notes 7: The Unruh Effect

Transcription:

Lecture # November 5 Scatterng of two dentcal partcle Relatvtc Quantum Mechanc: The Klen-Gordon equaton Interpretaton of the Klen-Gordon equaton The Drac equaton Drac repreentaton for the matrce α and β Covarant form of the Drac equaton Chapter 3, page 595-608 Chapter 5, page 679-694 694 Branden & Joachan,, Quantum Mechanc Scatterng of two dentcal partcle n the center-of of-ma frame (a) Detector (b) Detector θ π θ θ Partcle cattered n the drecton (θ,φ) Partcle cattered n the drecton (π θ,π+φ) Snce the partcle are dentcal collonal procee (a) and (b) can not be dtnguhed. In center-of-ma ytem µ ( r ) ψ ( r ) Eψ ( r ) + V = where µ=m/ the reduced ma, r=r -r.

Scatterng of two dentcal partcle pnle boon (a) Detector (b) Detector θ Partcle cattered n the drecton (θ,φ) π θ θ Partcle cattered n the drecton (π θ,π+φ) In clacal mechanc the dfferental cro ecton for catterng n the drecton (θ,φ) would be mply the um of dfferental cro ecton for obervaton of partcle and n that drecton. If the ame were true n quantum mechanc we would obtan the clacal reult cl k r f ( θ, φ) kr = f ( θ, π ) + f ( π θ, φ + π ) ; ψ ( r) r e + e r Scatterng of two dentcal partcle pnle boon (a) Detector (b) Detector θ Partcle cattered n the drecton (θ,φ) π θ θ Partcle cattered n the drecton (π θ,π+φ) In clacal mechanc the dfferental cro ecton for catterng n the drecton (θ,φ) would be mply the um of dfferental cro ecton for obervaton of partcle and n that drecton. If the ame were true n quantum mechanc we would obtan the clacal reult cl k r f ( θ, φ) kr = f ( θ, π ) + f ( π θ, φ + π ) ; ψ ( r) r e + e r

Scatterng of two dentcal partcle: pnle boon cl = f ( θ, π ) + f ( π θ, φ + π ) ncorrect reult Spnle boon: wave functon mut be ymmetrc under r r r r. Clearly, the functon ψ ( r) whch atfe boundary condton k r f ( θ, φ) kr ψ k ( r) r e + e r : not ymmetrc under r - r nterchange. However, we can make a + + + ymmetrc combnaton ψ ( r) = ψ k ( r) + ψ k ( r); ψ ( r) = ψ ( r). The correpondng aymptotc form ( ) ( ) [ (, ) (, )] kr + k r k r e ψ r r e + e + f θ φ + f π θ φ + π r nce r r : ( r, θ, φ) ( r, π θ, φ + π ). Scatterng of two dentcal partcle: pnle boon Therefore, the dfferental cro ecton = f ( θ, π ) + f ( π θ, φ + π ) * = f ( θ, π ) + f ( π θ, φ + π ) + Re f ( θ, π ) f ( π θ, φ + π ) and the total cro ecton σ tot = f ( θ, π ) + f ( π θ, φ + π ) 3

Scatterng of two dentcal pn ½ fermon Note: we aume that partcle nteract through central force. Total wave functon mut be antymmetrc wth repect of nterchangng two partcle. Cae : Snglet tate, S=0 the patal wave functon mut be ymmetrc. The correpondng catterng ampltude = f ( θ ) + f ( π θ ) Cae : Trplet tate, S= the patal wave functon mut be antymmetrc. The correpondng catterng ampltude t = ft ( θ ) ft ( π θ ) Scatterng of two dentcal pn ½ fermon If the pn of both partcle are randomly orented the dfferental cro ecton gven by 3 t = + 4 4 3 = f + f + 4 4 f f ( θ ) ( π θ ) t ( θ ) t ( π θ ) If the nteracton pn-ndependent,.e. f ( θ ) = f ( θ ) = f ( θ ) * = f ( θ ) + f ( π θ ) Re f ( θ ) f ( π θ ) t Agan, the reult dfferent from the clacal reult. 4

Relatvtc Quantum Mechanc The Klen-Gordon equaton Interpretaton of the Klen-Gordon equaton The Drac equaton Drac repreentaton for the matrce α and β Covarant form of the Drac equaton Why Relatvtc Quantum Mechanc? The Schrödnger equaton: correctly decrbe the phenomena only f partcle velocte are v c. It not nvarant under a Lorentz change of the reference frame (requred by the prncple of relatvty). Need: a relatvtc generalzaton! 5

The Klen-Gordon equaton So, how to come up wth uch an equaton? Free partcle of pn zero For the relatvtc partcle wth ret ma m and momentum p, 4 E = m c + p c. Ung the correpondence rule E Eop = ; p pop = 4 one can wrte: Ψ = ( m c c ) / Ψ. Problem:. It not clear how to nterpret the operator on rght-hand de. If expanded n power ere t lead to dfferental operator of nfnte order.. The tme and pace coordnate do not appear n a ymmetrc way (no relatvtc nvarance?). Free partcle of pn zero The Klen-Gordon equaton So we remove the quare root and try agan (there wll be conequence of removng th quare root!) 4 E = m c + p c E Eop = ; p pop = Ψ = Ψ 4 ( m c c ). The Klen-Gordon equaton Note: t econd-order dfferental equaton wth repect to the tme unlke the Schrödnger equaton. 6

Probabltc nterpretaton of nonrelatvtc quantum mechanc * P( r, t) = Ψ ( r, t) = Ψ ( r, t) Ψ( r, t) Poton probablty denty Probablty conerved: P(, t) d = 0 r r Ψ( r, t) Ung the Schrödnger equaton = + V ( r, t) Ψ( r, t) m P( r, t) we obtan + j( r, t) = 0, where j can be nterpreted a probablty current denty j r m ( ) ( ) * * (, t) = Ψ Ψ Ψ Ψ. Interpretaton of the Klen-Gordon equaton: Problem We try to contruct a poton probablty denty P(r,t) and probablty current denty j(r,t) whch atfy the contnuty equaton: Ψ P( r, t) + j( r, t) = 0. * Ψ 4 multply by Ψ = ( m c c ) Ψ multply by Ψ * Ψ 4 * Ψ = ( m c c ) Ψ * * * * Ψ Ψ = c Ψ Ψ Ψ Ψ ( ) 7

Interpretaton of the Klen-Gordon equaton: Problem If we requre that the expreon from j(r,t) and P(r,t) had correct non-relatvtc lmt we defne j r m ( ) ( ) * * (, t) = Ψ Ψ Ψ Ψ. P( r, t) Then, we obtan the equaton + j( r, t) = 0. wth P Ψ Ψ mc * * ( r, t) = Ψ Ψ. P(r,t) not potve-defnte and can not be nterpreted a poton probablty denty. Interpretaton of the Klen-Gordon equaton: Problem Free partcle Klen-Gordon equaton: Plane wave oluton: E = ω p = k Ψ = Ψ ( kr ωt ) Ψ ( r, t) = Ae. 4 ( m c c ). ω = m c + c k 4 We get addtonal negatve-energy 4 E = ± m c + c p oluton and energy pectrum not bound from below. Then, arbtrary large energy can be extracted from the ytem f external perturbaton lead to tranton between potve and negatve energy tate. mc 0 E = -mc mc 8

Interpretaton of the Klen-Gordon equaton In 934 W. Paul and V. Wekopf renterpreted Klen-Gordon equaton a a feld equaton and quantzed t ung the formalm of quantum feld theory. Klen-Gordon equaton Relatvtc wave equaton for pnle partcle n the framework of many-partcle theory; negatve energy tate are nterpreted n term of antpartcle. Stll, t poble to defne potve-defnte poton probablty denty wthn the framework of the relatvtc theory? Drac equaton Note: we wll tll get negatve-energy tate Drac equaton P.A. Drac (98) We tart from the wave equaton n the form Ψ = H Ψ. Ψ Ψ Ψ = Spatal coordnate (x =x, x =y, x 3 =z) of a pace-tme pont (event) Ψ N and the tme coordnate (x 4 =ct) have to enter on the ame footng. Therefore, the hamltonan H mut be lnear n pace dervatve a well. Free partcle α, α, α3 and β Smplet Hamltonan: ) Mut be ndependent of r and t ) Mut be lnear n p and m H = c + β mc = pop op ) are ndependent of r, t, p, and E ) do not have to commute wth each other p 9

How to determne α and β? Ψ = c Ψ + β mc Ψ or Eop c op β mc Ψ = 0 p The oluton of the Drac equaton alo mut be a oluton of the Klen-Gordon equaton E 4 c p m c Ψ = 0. op op We ue t to determne the retrcton on the value of α and β by matchng the coeffcent n Eop c pop β mc Eop c pop βmc Ψ = 0 and 4 E c p m c Ψ = 0. op op Note: we drop the ndex op n the dervaton below. How to determne α and β? Some tranformaton E c p β mc E c p β mc Ψ = 0 ( p) β ( p) ( p )( p) ( p) E Ec E mc c E + c + c β mc ( p) β β β 3 4 mc E + mc + m c Ψ = ( p ) ( p )( p) ( p) ( p) ( p )( p) ( p) ( p) 0 3 4 E E c β mc c mc β β β m c + + + + + Ψ = 0 3 4 E c mc β + β β m c Ψ = 0 E 3 3 ( ) ( ) c α p c α α + α α p p mc α β + βα p β m c Ψ = 0 3 4 j j j = < j = 0

How to determne α and β? Now we can match the coeffcent of 3 3 3 4 E c α p c ( αα j + α jα ) p p j mc ( αβ + βα ) p β m c Ψ = 0 = < j = and α = β = 4 E c p m c Ψ = 0. α β + βα = 0, =,, 3 α α + α α = 0 j j j Properte of α and β α = α = α = 3 β = { α β} { α β} { α β}, = 0 3, = 0, = 0 { α α} { α α3} { α α }, = 0, = 0, = 0 3 Therefore, α, α, α 3,and β antcommute n par and ther quare are equal to unty. Clearly, they mut be matrce. The egenvalue of α and β are ±. βα = α β ( ) α = βα β = α ββ = α β Tr α Tr βα β Tr α β Tr βα β = ( ) = ( ) = ( ) = 0 Tr α ( α ) = Tr ( β ) = 0 = α β = β

Tr What f the lowet rank of α and β? Drac repreentaton of α and β. What the lowet rank of the repreentaton for α and β? ( α ) Tr ( β ) 0 = = Therefore, rank N mut be even. For x matrce we can not fnd a repreentaton of more than 3 antcommutng matrce. Therefore, the lowet repreentaton ha N=4. Drac repreentaton: 0 σ I 0 α = β =, σ 0 0 I where σ (=,,3) are Paul matrce 0 0 0 σ x = σ y = σ z = 0 0 0 Drac equaton Ψ Ψ For N=4, the wave functon Ψ = Ψ N and decrbe pn ½ partcle. a four-component pnor We note that th reult may be foreeen a n non-relatvtc quantum mechanc pn ½ partcle are decrbed by -component pnor and each pn ½ partcle ha an antpartcle wth the ame ma and pn, whch lead to 4-component wave functon. Hgher rank matrx repreentaton correpond to partcle wth pn greater than ½.

Covarant form of the Drac equaton Ψ = c Ψ + β mc Ψ xµ ( x, ct) 3 Ψ β + α Ψ β mcψ = 0 x4 = x 3 mc βα + β + Ψ = 0 = x x4 mc γ µ + Ψ = 0 γ = βα γ 4 = β xµ γ, γ = δ, µ, ν =,,3, 4 { } µ ν µν From the Drac repreentaton 0 σ I 0 γ = γ 4, for the α and β = σ 0 0 I 3